A test configuration register (80) associated with a programmable memory device (88), wherein the signals at the outputs of the test configuration register force elements of the memory device into certain logic states to enable the device to be tested without programming the device's logic array (22).
|
14. A method for synchronously or asynchronously testing the functions of a programmable logic device, comprising the steps of:
loading a test memory with test configuration bits; forcing a configuration of the logic device responsive to the signals at the outputs of said test memory; and applying a test signal to at least one input line of said device, wherein said input line forms a portion of a data flow path of said device when not in test mode.
40. Circuitry for synchronously or asynchronously testing the functions of a device including a plurality of elements responsive to logic signals and a plurality of input lines, the input lines forming a portion of a data flow path of the device when not in test mode, comprising:
a test memory operable to receive, store and output a plurality of test configuration bits; and circuitry responsive to said test configuration bits for forcing the elements of the device into pre-determined configurations while test signals are applied to at least one of the plurality of input lines.
1. Circuitry for synchronously or asynchronously testing the functions of a programmable logic device, said device including a plurality of elements responsive to logic signals and a plurality of input lines, said input lines forming a portion of a data flow path of said device when not in test mode, comprising:
a test memory operable to receive, store and output a plurality of test configuration bits; and circuitry responsive to said test configuration bits for forcing said elements of the logic device into pre-determined configurations while test signals are applied to at least one or said plurality of input lines.
27. A programmable logic device comprising:
a plurality of elements responsive to logic signals; a plurality of input lines operable for inputting logic signals to said device, said plurality of input lines further operable for inputting test signals to said device, wherein said input lines form a portion of a data flow path of said device when not in test mode; a test memory operable to receive, store and output said test configuration bits; and circuitry responsive to said test configuration bits for forcing said elements of the logic device into predetermined configurations while said test signals are applied to said plurality of input lines.
2. The circuitry of
3. The circuitry or
4. The circuitry of
5. The circuitry of
6. The circuitry of
7. The circuitry of
8. The circuitry of
9. The circuitry of
10. The circuitry of
11. The circuitry of
12. The circuitry of
13. The circuitry of
15. The method of
16. The method of
17. The method of
latching the test configuration bits in the memory; gating the test configuration bits at the outputs of the memory with a test gating signal; and applying the test configuration bits from the outputs of the memory to elements of the logic device.
18. The method of
forcing elements of the logic device into logic conditions determined by the test configuration bits; and testing the functionality and performance of the resulting logical configuration.
19. The method of
20. The method of
21. The method of
22. The method of
23. The method of
24. The method of
25. The method of
26. The method of
28. The programmable logic device of
29. The programmable logic device of
30. The programmable logic device of
31. The programmable logic device of
32. The programmable logic device of
33. The programmable logic device of
34. The programmable logic device of
35. The programmable logic device of
36. The programmable logic device of
37. The programmable logic device of
38. The programmable logic device of
39. The programmable logic device of
41. The circuitry of
device. 47. The circuitry of claim 40 wherein one of the elements comprises a feedback false buffer and wherein said forcing circuitry includes circuitry to disable the feedback false buffer of the device. 48. The circuitry of claim 40 wherein one of the elements comprises an input/output buffer and wherein said forcing circuitry includes circuitry to disable the input/output buffer of the device. 49. The circuitry of claim 40 wherein one of the elements comprises a polarity switch and wherein said forcing circuitry includes circuitry to set and clear the polarity switch of the device. 50. The circuitry of claim 40 wherein one of the elements comprises a registered/combinatorial switch and wherein said forcing circuitry includes circuitry to select registered and combinatorial output of the device. 51. The circuitry of claim 40 wherein one of the elements comprises an asynchronous reset product term and wherein said forcing circuitry includes circuitry to disable the asynchronous reset product term of the device. 52. The circuitry of claim 40 wherein one of the elements comprises a synchronous preset product term and wherein said forcing circuitry includes circuitry to disable the synchronous preset product term of the device. 53. A method for synchronously or asynchronously testing the functions of a device, comprising the steps of: loading a test memory with test configuration bits; forcing a configuration of the device responsive to signals output from the test memory; and applying a test signal to at least one input line of the device, wherein the input line forms a portion of a data flow path of the device when not in test mode. 54. The method of claim 53 and further comprising the step of applying an enabling signal to the test memory. 55. The method of claim 53 wherein said loading step comprises the step of serially inputting the test configuration bits into the test memory. 56. The method of claim 53 wherein said forcing step comprises the steps of: latching the test configuration bits in the memory; gating the test configuration bits at the outputs of the memory with a test gating signal; and applying the test configuration bits from the outputs of the memory to elements of the device. 57. The method of claim 56 wherein said applying step comprises the steps of: forcing elements of the device into logic conditions determined by the test configuration bits; and testing the functionality and performance of the resulting logical configuration. 58. The method of claim 57 wherein said testing step further comprises the steps of testing the sum-of-products terms of the device. 59. The method of claim 57 wherein said testing step comprises the step of measuring Tpd from every input terminal of the device to every input/output terminal of the device. 60. The method of claim 57 wherein said testing step comprises the step of measuring Tsu and Tco for every output of the device. 61. The method of claim 57 wherein said testing step comprises the step of measuring Tsu from every input terminal of the device to every input/output terminal of the device. 62. The method of claim 57 wherein said testing step comprises the step of measuring Ten and Tdis from every input terminal of the device to every input/output terminal of the device. 63. The method of claim 57 wherein said testing step comprises the step of measuring Ten and Tdis for every input/output terminal of the device to every other input/output terminal of the device. 64. The method of claim 57 wherein said testing step comprises the step of measuring Tpd for asynchronous reset from every input terminal of the device to every input/output terminal of the device. 65. The method of claim 57 wherein said testing step comprises the step of measuring Tsu for synchronous preset from every input terminal of the device to every input/output terminal of the device. 66. A device, comprising: a plurality of elements responsive to logic signals; a plurality of input lines operable for inputting logic signals to the device, said plurality of input lines further operable for inputting test signals to the device, wherein said input lines form a portion of a data flow path of the device when no in test mode; a test memory operable to receive, store and output a plurality of test configuration bits; and circuitry responsive to said test configuration bits for forcing said elements of the device into pre-determined configurations while said test signals are applied to said plurality of input lines. 67. The device of claim 66 and further comprising a gate coupled to said test memory and operable to output test configuration bits to said configuring circuitry responsive to a control signal applied to the device. 68. The device of claim 66 wherein one of the elements comprises a true input buffer and wherein said configuring circuitry includes circuitry to disable the true input buffer of the device. 69. The device of claim 66 wherein one of the elements comprises a false input buffer and wherein said configuring circuitry includes circuitry to disable the false input buffer of the device. 70. The device of claim 66 wherein one of the elements comprises an output and wherein said configuring circuitry includes circuitry to disable the output of the device. 71. The device of claim 66 wherein one of the elements comprises a sum-of-products term and wherein said configuring circuitry includes circuitry to force the logical state of the sum-of-products term of the device. 72. The device of claim 66 wherein one of the elements comprises feedback true buffer and wherein said configuring circuitry includes circuitry to disable the feedback true buffer of the device. 73. The device of claim 66 wherein one of the elements comprises feedback false buffer and wherein said configuring circuitry includes circuitry to disable the feedback false buffer of the device. 74. The device of claim 66 wherein one of the elements comprises an input/output buffer and wherein said configuring circuitry includes circuitry to disable the input/output buffer of the device. 75. The device of claim 66 wherein one of the elements comprises a polarity switch and wherein said configuring circuitry includes a circuitry to disable the polarity switch of the device. 76. The device of claim 66 wherein one of the elements comprises a registered/combinatorial switch and wherein said configuring circuitry includes circuitry to force the state of the registered/combinatorial switch of the device. 77. The device of claim 66 wherein one of the elements comprises an asynchronous reset product term and wherein said configuring circuitry includes circuitry to disable the asynchronous reset product term of the device. 78. The device of claim 66 wherein one of the elements comprises a synchronous preset product term and wherein said configuring circuitry includes circuitry to disable the synchronous reset product term of the device. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This invention relates in general to the field of integrated circuits, and more particularly to circuitry and method for testing programmable logic devices.
As programmable logic becomes more generic and versatile, the means for testing the product prior to shipment needs to become more versatile. Programmable array logic (PAL) devices are programmed by the customer. However, prior to shipment it is necessary to verify the AC/DC/functional performance of the device. Because a PAL is non-functional if not programmed, it is necessary to add special test futures to assure that the customer receives only products meeting certain specifications.
Previous test circuit methodologies provided only limited ability to test specific features of PAL devices. The test features were fixed and limited and if the need arose for more creative or comprehensive testing, the test could not be performed without a design change. In addition, previous test circuits would not always use the same circuitry as used by the customer.
Past efforts to add testability to PAL devices have included the use of extra input lines and extra product terms under specific input conditions. The extra input lines are sensed through the "AND" array and the extra product terms are multiplexed into the "OR" gate. These features have allowed for verification of programming circuitry for every input line and product term is well is determining the functionality of the SUM-OF-PRODUCTS term for every product term. These features have also been used to test the AC performance of the device.
There are several disadvantages to this method of testing. All input and feedback buffers are not fully testable. This type of test does not always provide a good correlation with actual device performance and does not test all possible outputs or output configurations. The paths used for the test are not the actual operational device paths that are to be guaranteed to the customer. Thus, the problem of correlating results to the internal circuit delays becomes an issue and can cause "slow" devices to be incorrectly approved. Furthermore, the asynchronous reset and synchronous preset functions are not fully tested, if they are tested at all.
Another method for testing the performance of an unprogrammed PAL device uses a special setup condition which will disable certain device features and force certain device conditions. This technique is used on the TICPAL16XX devices manufactured by Texas Instruments Inc. Under a special setup condition, the device enters a test mode. In the test mode, all false input buffers and the true and false feedback buffers are forced into a disabled state where it will appear logically as if the programmable cells the buffers address are all programmed. For outputs in a non-register configuration, one-half of the outputs will have the SUM-OF-PRODUCTS term forced to a logical "1" condition and the OUTPUT-ENABLE product term will be available for test. The other half will have the OUTPUT-ENABLE product term forced to a logical "1" condition and the SUM-OF-PRODUCTS term will be available for test. For outputs in the registered configuration, there is no OUTPUT-ENABLE product term; thus the SUM-OF-PRODUCTS term is always available for test in the test mode.
Disadvantages to this approach include:
1) Only true input buffers can be tested.
2) Only certain tests can be performed on each non-registered output. One-half of the outputs can do only Tplh and Tphl, the other half can do only Tplz, and Tpzl. Thus, Tphz and Tpzh cannot be done.
3) Practice has shown this methodology to have little or no correlation to actual device performance which may be several nanoseconds slower than test results would imply.
Therefore, a need has arisen for PAL circuitry which can test the functions of a PAL device as if the device were in actual service.
In accordance with the present invention, circuitry is provided which substantially eliminates or reduces disadvantages and problems associated with prior PAL testing circuitry.
Circuitry for testing the functions of programmable logic device is provided. Specifically, a register to store an output test bits is provided as is circuitry for forcing elements of the logic device into predetermined logic conditions responsive to the test bits.
Thus, the present invention has the technical advantage of permitting a programmable logic device to be fully tested without programming the device.
A more complete understanding of the present invention may be derived by referring to the detailed description and claims when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numbers indicate like features through the drawings, and wherein:
FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic representation of a prior an programmable array logic (PAL) device;
FIG. 2 illustrates a schematic representation of an input buffer of a prior an PAL device;
FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic representation of the test configuration register circuitry of the present invention; and
FIG. 4 illustrates a schematic representation of a PAL device using the testing circuitry of the present invention.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention is best understood by referring to FIGS. 1-4 of the drawings and the Table which follows the description herein, like numerals being used for like and corresponding parts of the various drawings.
FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic representation of a prior an PAL circuit, generally referred to by reference numeral 10. Although the PAL 10 represented in the FIGUREs and described herein contains four input and two output nodes (herein referred to as a 4V2 PAL designation), the concept of the prior art and of the present invention can be applied to a PAL with any number of input and output nodes. Input signals I1 and I2 are applied to the PAL 10 through input buffers, indicated generally at 12 and 14, respectively. Except where otherwise noted, circuitry associated with one input or output is duplicated at each other input and output.
I1 is also buffered by a buffer 16 and is also used as a timing signal CLK. The input buffer 12 produces two output signals, I1 TRUE and I1 FALSE, which are applied to two input lines 18 and 20 of the logic array 22.
In the 4V2 PAL 10 illustrated, input signal I1 has associated with it an output macrocell 23. The signals on eight product lines, indicated generally at 24, represent the ANDing, indicated by the AND gates at 26 of the input signals. The ANDed signals are then OR'd by an OR gate 28 to produce a SUM-OF-PRODUCTS term at the output node of the OR gate 28. Similarly, the signals on product lines 30 and 32 are ANDed, represented by the AND gates 34 and 36, respectively, to produce signals ASYNCHRONOUS RESET (`AR`) and SYNCHRONOUS PRESET (`SP`), respectively. The signal on product line 38 is ANDed, represented by AND gate 40, to produce signal OUTPUT-ENABLE.
The SUM-OF-PRODUCTS term is sent into one input of the register multiplexer (MUX) 42 and into the input of a D flip-flop 44. The non-inverting output of flip-flop 44 is coupled to the second input of register MUX 42; the inverting output of flip-flop 44 is coupled to one input of the feedback multiplexer (MUX) 46.
The output of register MUX 42 is inverted by an inverter 48. The output of MUX 42 and inverter 48 are coupled to the two inputs, respectively, of the polarity MUX 50. The output of the polarity MUX 50 is coupled to the input of the output buffer 52 which is controlled by signal OUTPUT-ENABLE. The output of output buffer 52 forms input/output node I/O and is also fed back into the second input of feedback MUX 46. The output of feedback MUX 46 is buffered by a feedback buffer 54 and the resulting FEEDBACK TRUE and FEEDBACK FALSE signals are coupled to input lines 56 and 58, respectively, of the logic array 22.
When signal P0 is a logical "1" and applied to polarity MUX 50, the output I/O0 is active high; when signal P0 is a logical "0", the output I/O0 is active low.
When signal R0 is a logical "1" and applied to register MUX 42 and feedback MUX 46, the output I/O0 is combinatorial and the feedback comes from I/O0. When signal R0 is a logical "0", the output I/O0 is under register control and the feedback comes from the register.
The output macrocell 60 for input/output node I/O1 comprises the same circuitry as for input/output node I/O0.
To better understand the use of the programmable test feature of the present invention, an understanding of the PAL 10 is necessary. The principal features of the PAL 10 are: 1) normal true and false paths of the input and feedback buffers 12 and 54; 2) an input pin (I1) that doubles as a clock pin CLK; 3) asynchronous reset and synchronous preset product terms, AR and SP, (functional only when the output is in register configuration); 4) "AND-OR" logic 26 and 28 providing a SUM-OF-PRODUCTS function and with a programmable OUTPUT-ENABLE product term; and 5) individually configurable outputs I/O0 and I/O1 determined by two control signals: P determines output polarity ("0"=active low, "1"=active high) and R determines registered or combinatorial outputs ("0"=registered outputs, "1"=combinatorial outputs).
The EPROM/FAMOS cells (not shown), located at the intersections of input lines and product lines of the logic array 22, function like normal N-channel FETs when in the erased state. Thus, when the gate of a cell is addressed (logical "1"), the device is "on" and the drain of the cell is a logical "0". Similarly, if the gate of the cell is not addressed (logical "0"), the FET is not conducting and the drain of the cell is a logical "1". Whenever a cell is programmed, the threshold voltage of the cell is shifted to a super high level, such that the FET will never turn-on under normal operation and the drain of the cell will always be a logical "1".
In the PAL logic array 22, the gates of the cells are tied to the input lines, such as input lines 18, 20, 56, and 58, and the drains of the cells are tied to the product lines, such as 24, 30 and 38.
Logically, the FAMOS cell acts as an inverter of the input data to the product term. Additionally, because the drains of the FAMOS cells are tied together, a logical "0" at the drain of any cell will predominate over any number of logical "1"s. This is the AND function represented by AND gates 26, 34, 36 and 40. Thus, the result is the ANDing of inverted input data. The desired result of ANDing the input data is achieved by inverting the data coming out of the input buffer 12 (i.e., when a logical "0" is sensed on the input, the output of the false buffer will be a logical "0" and the output of the true buffer will be a logical "1". If a logical "1" is sensed on the input, the output of the false buffer will be a logical "1" and the output of the true buffer will be a logical "0".)
The SUM-OF-PRODUCTS term, OUTPUT-ENABLE product term, ASYNCHRONOUS RESET product term, SYNCHRONOUS PRESET product term, architecture bits P and R, and the signal CLK are the inputs to the output macrocell 23.
The D flip-flop 44 is a master/slave flip-flop. Whenever the signal CLK is low (logical "0"), the slave data is latched and data passes from the SUM-OF-PRODUCTS into the master part of the flip-flop 44. When the signal CLK goes high, the data from the SUM-OF-PRODUCTS term is latched in the master and passes from the master to the slave. Whenever the asynchronous reset signal AR becomes a logical "1", the slave latch immediately resets to a logical "0". Whenever the synchronous preset signal SP is a logical "1" prior to the edge of signal CLK, the master latch is preset as if the SUM-OF-PRODUCTS term was a logical "1", regardless of its actual state.
The OUTPUT-ENABLE product term 38 controls the output buffer 52. When the signal OUTPUT-ENABLE is a logical "1", the buffer is enabled; when the signal is logical "0", buffer 51 is in tri-state.
The architecture signals P and R are the select inputs for the three output multiplexers 42, 46 and 50. When signal P is a logical "0", the output is active low; when it is a logical "1", the output is active high. When the signal R is a logical "0", the output is under the control of flip-flop 44 and the feedback also comes from the flip-flop. When it is a logical "1", the output is combinatorial with I/O feedback.
FIG. 2 illustrates a schematic representation of the details of an input buffer 12 of the prior art PAL 10. The input signal I1 is sent into the gates of a P-channel FET 64 and an N-channel FET 66. The drain of P-channel FET 64 and the drain of N-channel FET 66 are coupled to each other and to the gates of a second FET pair 68 and 70. The drain of the second P-channel FET 68 and the drain of the second N-channel FET 70 are coupled to each other and to the gates of a third FET pair 72 and 74. The drain of the third P-channel FET 72 and the drain of the third N-channel FET 74 are coupled to each other and the resulting node, coupled to product line 18, produces the I1 TRUE signal of input buffer 12.
The node at which the drain of P-channel FET 64 and the drain of N-channel FET 66 are coupled to each other is also coupled to the gates of a fourth FET pair 76 and 78. The drain of the fourth P-channel FET 76 and the drain of the fourth N-channel FET 78 are coupled to each other and the resulting node, coupled to product line 20, produces the I1 FALSE signal of input buffer 12.
The sources of the P-channel FETs 64, 68, 72 and 76 are coupled to a voltage source VS. The sources of the N-channel FETs 66, 70, 74, and 78 are coupled to ground.
FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic representation of the test configuration register circuitry of the present invention, indicated generally at 80. In the preferred embodiment, test configuration register 82 comprises one D flip-flop for each test signal desired; FIG. 3 illustrates the use of 16 test signals, TB0 -TB15, with 16 flip-flops, D0 -D15. During a product test, shift-clock signal SCLK is gated with enable signal SUB-MODE1 and applied to the clock inputs of flip-flops D0 -D15. Serial data signal SD1 is also gated with signal SUB-MODE1 and applied to the input of flip-flop D15. The data bits are entered serially and shifted until register 82 is full. Signal SUB-MODE1 then disables the register 82 and the data is protected.
To start a test, the outputs of flip-flops D0 -D15 are gated through AND gates G0 -G15 with a signal TEST. The resultant signals, TB0 -TB15, are applied to elements of the logic device under test to force the desired logic configuration.
FIG. 4 illustrates a schematic representation of PAL with the circuitry of the present invention, indicated generally at 88. As in the prior art buffer 12, the input buffer 89 of the present invention comprises P-channel FETs 64, 68, 72, and 76 and N-channel FETs 66, 70, 74, and 78. Signals I1 TRUE and I1 FALSE are applied to input lines 18 and 20, respectively, of logic array 22.
The TRUE portion of input buffer 89 further comprises P-channel FET 90, N-channel FETs 92 and 94, and inverter 96. The FALSE portion of input buffer 89 further comprises P-channel FET 98, N-channel FETs 100 and 102, and inverter 104.
Signal TB12 is applied to the gates of FETs 90 and 94 and to inverter 96. The drain of FET 90 is coupled to the source of FET 72, the drain of FET 92 is coupled to the source of FET 74, and the output of inverter 96 is coupled to the gate of FET 92. The drain of FET 94 is coupled to the node at which signal I1 TRUE is produced.
Similarly, a signal TB13 is applied to the gates of FETs 98 and 102 and to inverter 104. The drain of FET 98 is coupled to the source of FET 76, the drain of FET 100 is coupled to the source of FET 78, and the output of inverter 104 is coupled to the gate of FET 100. The drain of FET 102 is coupled to the node at which signal I1 FALSE is produced.
The sources of P-channel FETs 90 and 98 are coupled to a voltage source VS, and the sources of N-channel FETs 92, 94, 100 and 102 are coupled to ground.
In the output of macrocell of the present invention, the representative AND gates 26, 34, 36 and 40 coupled to the product lines 24, 30, 32, and 38 of the logic array 22 are coupled to N-channel FETs to enable and disable the product lines. The drain of FET 110 is coupled to the product line 30, the output of which produces the signal AR. The gate of FET 110 receives test bit TB14 from register 82, and the source is coupled to ground.
The drain of FET 112 is coupled to the product line 38, associated with signal OUTPUT-ENABLE. The gate of FET 112 receives test bit TB8 and the source is coupled to ground. Test bit TB8 is also sent to the inverting input of AND gate 114. The non-inverting input of AND gate 114 receives test bit TB2. The outputs of AND gates 40 and 114 are coupled to the inputs of OR gate 116, the output of which produces signal OUTPUT-ENABLE.
The drain of each FET 118 is coupled to a product line 24. Each gate is coupled to the output of AND gate 120, and each source is coupled to ground. The output of AND gate 120 is also coupled to the inverting input of AND gate 122. The non-inverting input of AND gate 122 receives test bit TB3 and the output of AND gate 122 is coupled to an input of OR gate 28.
The non-inverting input of AND gate 120 receives test enable signal TEST and the inverting input receives test bit TB15.
Test bit TB15 is also received at the gate of FET 124. The drain of FET 124 is coupled to product line 32, which produces signal SP. The source of FET 124 is coupled to ground.
MUX 126 is controlled by test enable signal TEST; one input receives register/combinatorial signal R and the other receives the test bit TB11. Similarly, MUX 128 is controlled by TEST; one input receives polarity signal P and the other receives test bit TB10.
The input buffers associated with input I2 and the product lines associated with output I/O1 are coupled to similar controlling circuitry shown generally in FIG. 4 as reference numerals 130 and 132, respectively. Test bits TB0 and TB1 are received by input buffer 130. Signals CLK and TEST and test bits TB2, TB3, TB6, TB7, TB9, TB10, TB11, TB14, and TB15 are received by output circuitry 132.
In operation, under special test conditions the PAL device has certain elements properly forced to a certain logical conditions; then the unforced elements and their related functional paths can be tested for both functionality and AC/DC performance. Potential elements for forcing to specific conditions are:
1. Force the input and feedback true and false buffers to a logical "0" state. This will cause all FAMOS cells tied to the input lines that the buffers represent to appear as programmed to the product term "AND" gate. This will allow for toggling of the SUM-OF-PRODUCTS term, the OUTPUT-ENABLE, AR and SP product terms.
2. Force all OUTPUT-ENABLE product terms to a logical "1" state. By adding this forcing function, Tpd can be tested without an output in tri-state conflicting with the result.
3. Force all SUM-OF-PRODUCTS terms to a logical "1" state. By adding this forcing function, Ten /Tdis can be tested without the SUM-OF-PRODUCTS term conflicting with result.
4. Force the configuration of output macrocells 23 and 132. This allows for testing of all configurations of the output. Thus, Tpd and Tsu can be tested for the output without actually programming the logic array 22 for the different configurations for the test.
5. Force the AR and SP functions to logical "0" state. By adding these configurations, the AR and SP functions can be tested. Tsu can also be tested without conflict being created by the product terms. Whenever the SP product term is not forced to a logical "0" state, it is assumed that this function is to be tested. Thus, the SUM-OF-PRODUCTS term needs to be forced to a logical "0" state, overriding the forcing function of No. 3 above.
6. Force the OUTPUT-ENABLE product term to logical "0" state. There should be two separately available forcing functions breaking the outputs into two groups. Additionally, these functions need to override the forcing function for No. 2 above, for their respective outputs. This will allow for I/O feedback testing between the two groups.
TABLE 1 below illustrates the functions of the test bits of one embodiment of the invention. Except with respect to test bits TB10 and TB11, a logical "0" on a test bit results in normal operation. A logical "1" turns on the FET to which the test bit is sent, thereby grounding the input and disabling the element to which the FET is coupled. By properly inputting data into the test configuration register 82, the test engineer can test device speed parameters, such as:
1. Tpd from every I (true and false paths) to every I/O. Tpd from every I/O (true and false paths) to other I/O's (for both polarities).
2. Tco for every output (for both polarities).
3.
Tsu from every I (true and false paths) to every I/O.
Tsu from every I/O (true and false paths) to other I/O's (for both polarities).
4.
Ten and Tdis from every I (true and false paths) to every I/O.
Ten and Tdis, from every I/O (true and false paths) to other I/O's (for both polarities).
5. Tpd asynchronous reset from every I (true and false paths) to every I/O (for both polarities).
6. Tsu synchronous preset from every I (true and false paths) to every I/O.
A non-exhaustive summary of some of the available tests is now given by way of example:
To test Ten /Tdis from input true path to I/O, the test configuration register is loaded as follows:
| ______________________________________ |
| BIT VALUE FUNCTION |
| ______________________________________ |
| 0 "0⇄ |
| Enable true input path buffer (I2) |
| 1 "1" Force false input path to logical one (I2) |
| 2 "0" Normal operation for output enable product |
| terms |
| 3 "1" Force SUM-OF-PRODUCT terms to logical |
| one |
| (SYNCHRONOUS PRESET will be disabled) |
| 4 "1" Force true feedback path to logical one |
| (I/O0) |
| 5 "1" Force false feedback path to logical one |
| (I/O0) |
| 6 "1" Force true feedback path to logical one |
| (I/O1) |
| 7 "1" Force false feedback path to logical one |
| (I/O1) |
| 8 "0" Do not disable output (i.e., allow normal |
| output operation) (I/O0) |
| 9 "0" Do not disable output (i.e., allow normal |
| output operation) (I/O0) |
| 10 X Both polarities need to be tested |
| 11 "1" Combinational outputs for Ten /T dis |
| measurement |
| 12 "0" Enable I1 true path buffer |
| 13 "1" Force false path I1 to logical one |
| 14 X ASYNCHRONOUS RESET valid only in |
| register configuration |
| 15 "1" Force SYNCHRONOUS PRESET product |
| term to logical zero |
| ______________________________________ |
In this configuration, after forcing each input except the input to be tested to a logical one, pulsing the input under test (either I1 or I2) will cause all of the outputs to be enabled (input="1") and disabled (input="0"). By changing the polarity bit, Tpzh, Tphz, Tpzl and Tplz can be measured. Therefore, Ten /Tdis can be tested from every input true path to every I/O. Likewise, the false paths may be tested by inverting bits TB0, TB1, TB12 and TB13.
To test Ten /Tdis from an I/O true path to an I/O, the configuration test register is loaded as follows:
| ______________________________________ |
| BIT VALUE FUNCTION |
| ______________________________________ |
| 0 "1" Force true input path to logical one (I2) |
| 1 "1" Force false input path to logical one (I2) |
| 2 "0" Normal operation for output enable product |
| terms (will be overridden by TB8 for |
| output I/O0) |
| 3 "1" Force SUM-OF-PRODUCT terms to logical |
| one |
| (SYNCHRONOUS PRESET will be disabled) |
| 4 "0" Enable true feedback path (I/O2) |
| 5 "1" Force false feedback path to logical one |
| (I/O0) |
| 6 "1" Force true feedback path to logical one |
| (I/O1) |
| 7 "1" Force false feedback path to logical one |
| (I/O1) |
| 8 "1" Disable output (I/O0) |
| 9 "0" Do not disable output (I/O1) |
| 10 X Both polarities need to be tested |
| 11 "1" Combinational outputs for Ten /Tdis |
| measurement |
| 12 "1" Force true path I1 to logical one |
| 13 "1" Force false path I1 to logical one |
| 14 X ASYNCHRONOUS RESET valid only in |
| register configuration |
| 15 "1" Force SYNCHRONOUS PRESET product |
| term to logical zero |
| ______________________________________ |
In this configuration, after forcing I/O1 to a logical "1" or "0", pulsing the input under test (I/O0) causes the output (I/O1) to be enabled (input="1") and disabled (input="0"). By changing the polarity bit P, Tpzh, Tphz, Tpzl and Tplz can be measured.
To test Tpd ASYNCHRONOUS RESET from an input true path to an I/O, the test configuration register is loaded as follows:
| ______________________________________ |
| BIT VALUE FUNCTION |
| ______________________________________ |
| 0 "0" Enable true input path buffer (I2) |
| 1 "1" Force false input path to logical one |
| (I2) |
| 2 "1" Force output enable product terms to |
| logical one |
| 3 "1" Force SUM-OF-PRODUCT terms to a |
| logical one (SP will be disabled) |
| 4 "1" Force true feedback path to logical one |
| (I/O0) |
| 5 "1" Force false feedback path to logical one |
| (I/O0) |
| 6 "1" Force true feedback path to logical one |
| (I/O1) |
| 7 "1" Force false feedback path to logical one |
| (I/O1) |
| 8 "0" Do not disable output (i.e., allow |
| normal output operation (I/O0) |
| 9 "0" Do not disable ouput (i.e., allow |
| normal output operation (I/O1) |
| 10 X Both polarities need to be tested |
| 11 "0" Registered outputs for Tpd AR |
| measurement |
| 12 "0" Enable I1 true path for Tpd |
| 13 "1" Force false path I1 to logical one |
| 14 "0" Enable AR product term |
| 15 "1" Force SP product term to logical zero |
| ______________________________________ |
In this configuration, forcing all inputs to a logical one resets the output register 44. Therefore, holding all inputs at a logical "1" state (except the input under test, which should be a logical "0") and clocking the device, the register 44 will load a logical "1". Then, by pulsing the input under test from a "0" to a "1", the Tpd can be measured from input to AR of the output. By changing the polarity bit, P, Tphl and Tplh can be measured.
To test Tpd AR from an I/O true path to an I/O, load the test configuration register is loaded as follows:
| ______________________________________ |
| BIT VALUE FUNCTION |
| ______________________________________ |
| 0 "1" Force true input path to logical one (I2) |
| 1 "1" Force false input path to logical one (I2) |
| 2 "1" Force output enable product terms to |
| logical one (overridden by TB8 for |
| output I/O0) |
| 3 "1" Force SUM-OF-PRODUCT terms to a logical |
| one (SP will be disabled) |
| 4 "0" Enable feedback true path (I/O0) |
| 5 "1" Force feedback false path to logical one |
| (I/O0) |
| 6 "1" Force feedback true path to logical one |
| (I/O1) |
| 7 "1" Force feedback false path to logical one |
| (I/O1) |
| 8 "1" Disable output I/O0 |
| 9 "0" Enable output I/O1 |
| 10 X Both polarities need to be tested |
| 11 "0" Registered outputs for Tpd AR measurement |
| 12 "1" Force true path I1 to logical one |
| 13 "1" Form false path I1 to logical one |
| 14 "0" Enable AR product term |
| 15 "1" Force SP product term to logical zero |
| ______________________________________ |
In this configuration, forcing I/O0 to a logical "1" state causes the output register 44 to reset. Therefore, holding I/O0 at a logical "0" state and clocking the device, the register 44 will load a logical one. By then pulsing the input under test from a "0" to a "1", Tpd AR can be measured from I/O0 to I/O1.
The foregoing circuitry and method of programmable testing for PAL's achieves more versatile and extensive testing than previously possible without programming the FAMOS cells in the logic array 22.
Although the present invention has been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope or the invention as defined by the appended claims.
| TABLE 1 |
| ______________________________________ |
| TEST MODE CONFIGURATION REGISTER (4V2) |
| BIT LOGICAL ZERO LOGICAL ONE |
| ______________________________________ |
| 0 Normal Operation |
| Disable true input buffer I2 |
| 1 Normal Operation |
| Disable false input buffer I2 |
| 2 Normal Operation |
| Outputs always enabled |
| (can be overridden by TB8 or TB9) |
| 3 Normal Operation |
| SUM-OF-PRODUCT term always a |
| logical one, unless SP is |
| enabled, the SUM-OF-PRODUCT |
| term always a logical "0". |
| 4 Normal Operation |
| Disable true feedback buffer |
| I/O0 |
| 5 Normal Operation |
| Disable false feedback buffer I/O0 |
| 6 Normal Operation |
| Disable true feedback buffer I/O1 |
| 7 Normal Operation |
| Disable false feedback buffer I/O1 |
| 8 Normal Operation |
| I/O0 always disabled |
| (will override TB2) |
| 9 Normal Operation |
| I/O1 always disabled |
| (will override TB2) |
| 10 Polarity active low |
| Polarity active high |
| 11 Registered Outputs |
| Combinatorial outputs |
| 12 Normal Operation |
| Disable true buffer I1 |
| 13 Normal Operation |
| Disable false buffer I1 |
| 14 Normal Operation |
| Disable asynchronous reset |
| product term |
| 15 Normal Operation |
| Disable synchronous preset |
| product term |
| ______________________________________ |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 5633599, | Jul 29 1994 | NEC Corporation | Semiconductor integrated circuit with a test circuit for input buffer threshold |
| 5736867, | Jun 04 1996 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | Method and circuit for reconfiguring a buffer |
| 6239611, | Jun 10 1999 | XILINX, Inc.; Xilinx, Inc | Circuit and method for testing whether a programmable logic device complies with a zero-hold-time requirement |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 3958110, | Dec 18 1974 | IBM Corporation | Logic array with testing circuitry |
| 4366393, | Mar 15 1979 | Nippon Electric Co., Ltd. | Integrated logic circuit adapted to performance tests |
| 4503387, | Dec 30 1982 | Intersil Corporation | A.C. Testing of logic arrays |
| 4517672, | Sep 07 1981 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and arrangement for an operational check of a programmable logic array |
| 4625311, | Jun 18 1984 | Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | Programmable array logic circuit with testing and verification circuitry |
| 4635261, | Jun 26 1985 | Motorola, Inc. | On chip test system for configurable gate arrays |
| 4740919, | Jun 04 1985 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Electrically programmable logic array |
| 4758745, | Sep 19 1986 | Actel Corporation | User programmable integrated circuit interconnect architecture and test method |
| 4763020, | Sep 06 1985 | RICOH COMPANY, LTD , A CORP OF JAPAN | Programmable logic device having plural programmable function cells |
| 4780628, | Nov 06 1986 | International Computers Limited | Testing programmable logic arrays |
| 4857773, | Sep 06 1985 | Ricoh Co., Ltd. | Programming logic device with test-signal enabled output |
| 4857774, | Sep 19 1986 | Actel Corporation | Testing apparatus and diagnostic method for use with programmable interconnect architecture |
| 4879688, | Mar 04 1985 | LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, A DE CORP | In-system programmable logic device |
| 4893311, | Apr 25 1988 | MOTOROLA, INC , SCHAUMBURG, ILL A CORP OF DE | CMOS implementation of a built-in self test input generator (BISTIG) |
| 4920515, | Oct 23 1987 | RICOH COMPANY, LTD , A CORP OF JAPAN | Programmable logic array having an improved testing arrangement |
| 4961191, | Sep 02 1988 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Test circuit for logic circuits |
| 5017809, | Oct 23 1989 | Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | Method and apparatus for program verification of a field programmable logic device |
| 5032783, | Oct 23 1985 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Test circuit and scan tested logic device with isolated data lines during testing |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Jun 11 1993 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Dec 11 1998 | M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
| Jan 11 1999 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
| Sep 24 2002 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Apr 25 1998 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Oct 25 1998 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Apr 25 1999 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Apr 25 2001 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Apr 25 2002 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Oct 25 2002 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Apr 25 2003 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Apr 25 2005 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Apr 25 2006 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Oct 25 2006 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Apr 25 2007 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Apr 25 2009 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |