A rolling mill reforming station has an annular chamber into which rings are dropped to accumulate in coil form. A guide member is rotated about a circular path surrounding the path of ring descent. The guide member has a three dimensionally curved shaped guide surface configured in the general shape of a plow share which distributes the descending rings around the circumference of the accumulating coil.
|
1. In an apparatus for receiving a series of loops descending along a vertical path from a delivery device, and for accumulating the thus received loops in the form of an annular coil, a device for horizontally distributing the loops as they descend into the apparatus, said device comprising:
a) means defining a circular path surrounding said vertical path; b) a curved rotatable guide member having a three dimensionally shaped guide face formed as a segment of the interior surface of an inverted hollow cone, said guide face having: (i) a top edge extending from a front end to a rear end along a segment of said circular path; (ii) a trailing edge extending downwardly from said rear end to a lower end; and (iii) a leading edge extending upwardly from said lower end and angularly with respect to said trailing edge to said front end, said guide face extending into said vertical path and being arranged to be contacted by and to horizontally deflect the descending loops away from the said segment of said circular path; and c) means for rotating said guide member around said circular path to circumferentially distribute the thus deflected loops around the axis of the accumulating annular coil.
2. The device as claimed in
3. The device is claimed in
said second distance (d2) is measured as: ##EQU2## where: Da =is the outer diameter of said chamber Db =is the inner diameter of said chamber C=is a clearance constant
4. The device as claimed in
|
1. Field of The Invention
This invention relates generally to reforming stations in a wire rod mill, and is concerned in particular with an improved means for distributing wire rod loops as they are being received from the delivery end of a cooling conveyor and accumulated in coil form.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In a typical wire rod mill installation, as indicated schematically in FIG. 1, billets are reheated in a furnace 10, and then are continuously hot rolled through roughing, intermediate and finishing sections 12, 14 and 16 of the mill. The finished wire rod is then preliminarily cooled in water boxes 18 before being formed into loops L by a laying head 20. The loops are received in an overlappang arrangement on a cooling conveyor 22 where they are subjected to further controlled cooling. Thereafter, the loops drop from the delivery end of the conveyor into a reforming station 24 where they are gathered into upstanding cylindrical coils. The coils are then compacted, banded and transferred to other locations (not shown) for further processing or shipment to off site customers.
As the loops drop into the reforming station, their orientation with respect to each other has an effect on the shape and size of the resulting coil. For example, if the loops are allowed to pile up at one side, the coil is likely to be lopsided and unstable. It is desirable, therefore, to achieve a uniform distribution of successive loops around the circumference of the coil as it is being formed. In this way, the coil takes on a more stable configuration, and subsequent compaction will result in increased density, thereby minimizing the space occupied by the coils during transit and storage.
U.S. Pat. No. Re. 26,052 discloses one attempt at achieving improved loop distribution through the use of a rotating deflector arm extending radially inwardly towards the center of the reforming chamber, with its innermost surface spaced from the opposite side of the chamber by a distance substantially equal to the diameter of the descending loops. Theoretically, this arrangement can operate satisfactorily as long as the loops follow a more or less constant path of descent. However, under actual operating conditions in a rolling mill environment, the loops can and often do stray from one path, thus presenting a danger that they will hang up on the arm. When this occurs, subsequent loops will rapidly pile up above the rotating arm, the result being an uncontrolled tangle necessitating a complete shutdown.
A general objective of the present invention is to achieve improved loop distribution during the coil forming operation, without the attendant drawbacks of the prior art.
A more specific objective of the present invention is to provide a rotating three dimensionally curved shaped guide surface 60 exetnding into the path of loop descent. As can best be seen in FIG. 5, the guide surface 60 preferably defines a segment of the interior of an inverted hollow reference cone 62.
With reference in particular to FIG. 4, it will be seen that the guide surface 60 has a top edge 60a extending from a front end 60b to a rear end 60c along a segment of the circular path Pa. A trailing edge 60d extends downwardly from the rear end 60c to a lower end 60c. A leading edge 60f extends upwardly from the lower end 60e and angularly with respect to the trailing edge 60d to the front end 60b. Preferably, the slope of the leading edge 60f changes at 60g to define a more sharply angled portion adjacent to the front end 60b.
With reference to FIG. 7, it will be seen that the leading end 60b of the guide surface 60 is spaced from the opposite surface of the tub 26 by a first distance d1, which is approximately equal to the outer diameter Da of the annular reforming chamber 30. The lower end 60e of guide surface 60 is spaced from the inner tub diameter by a second distance d2 which is less than d1, but somewhat greater than the diameter of the loops L being received in the chamber. Preferably, ##EQU1## Where:
Da =outer diameter of chamber 30
Db =inner diameter of chamber 30
c=clearance constant
With this arrangement, as each loop descends into the reforming chamber, it will fall free of the leading end 60b of the guide surface, with initial contact with the guide surface occuring behind the leading end and below the upper edge 60a, typically along a peripheral segment of the loop indicated schematically in FIG. 7 as well as in FIG. 8 at L5. As the loop slides downwardly across the guide surface 60, and the guide surface is rotated in the direction R, the peripheral segment L5 will gradually diminish until the loop falls free of the lower end 60e. The net result is that the loop is gradually and smoothly urged away from the guide surface towards the opposite surface of the tub wall. By contacting each loop along a peripheral segment, the loops are prevented from rolling across the guide surface and thus disturbing the guiding action. This effect is imparted to successive loops as the guide surface continues to rotate around the circumference of the tub, thus producing a uniform distribution of rings in a controlled overlapping relationship. The front end 60b of the guide surface remains outboard of the descending loops, which insures that leading edge 60f does not come into damaging contact with the loops.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6073873, | Nov 14 1997 | Morgan Construction Company | Coil forming apparatus and method |
6158683, | Mar 18 1998 | SMS Schloemann-Siemag AG | Apparatus for forming rolled wire-rod coil |
6726138, | Oct 25 2000 | SMS Siemag Aktiengesellschaft | Device for controlling a discharge drop position of rod wire coils stackable in a bundle build-up chute |
9162269, | Nov 29 2012 | Primetals Technologies USA LLC | Coil forming apparatus and method |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3176385, | |||
3496966, | |||
4437620, | Apr 13 1981 | Nippon Steel Corporation | Method and apparatus for gathering rings or wire rods into coils |
5143315, | Feb 12 1990 | Unimetal | Method and device for forming coils of metal wire |
BE687078, | |||
DE1235100, | |||
DE2102684, | |||
GB1160488, | |||
JP53131948, | |||
26052, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 19 1995 | Morgan Construction Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jun 16 2010 | Morgan Construction Company | SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC | MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 024640 | /0551 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
May 30 1997 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 27 2001 | M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 28 2005 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Feb 04 2000 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Aug 04 2000 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 04 2001 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Feb 04 2003 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Feb 04 2004 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Aug 04 2004 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 04 2005 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Feb 04 2007 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Feb 04 2008 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Aug 04 2008 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 04 2009 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Feb 04 2011 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |