Batch annealed, semi-processed and fully processed motor lamination steels are made by processes which subject a slab having an ultra low carbon composition (less than 0.01%) to at least the following steps: hot rolling with an austenite finishing temperature, coiling at a temperature ranging from 1300°-1450° F., and light temper rolling (less than 1.0% reduction) or leveling; reheating at a temperature less than 2300° F., hot rolling with a ferrite finishing temperature, coiling at a temperature less than 1200° F., and light temper rolling or leveling; or hot rolling with a ferrite finishing temperature, coiling at a temperature ranging from 1100°-1350° F. without a subsequent hot band anneal, and light temper rolling or leveling.

Patent
   RE35967
Priority
Apr 26 1994
Filed
Jul 21 1997
Issued
Nov 24 1998
Expiry
Apr 26 2014
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
1
46
all paid
18. A method of making electrical steel strip characterized by low core loss and high permeability comprising the steps of:
hot rolling a slab into a strip having a composition consisting essentially of (% by weight):
______________________________________
C: up to 0.01
Si: 0.20-1.35
Al: 0.10-0.45
Mn: 0.10-1.0
S: up to 0.015
N: up to 0.006
Sb: up to 0.07
Sn: up to 0.12, and
the balance being substantially iron,
______________________________________
followed by coiling the strip, cold rolling the strip and batch annealing the strip, and then flattening the strip with a leveling process, wherein the strip has a thickness that has been reduced by said leveling process by an amount ranging from about 0.25 to about 0.6% and the strip has a permeability when stress relief annealed of at least 2500 Gauss/Oersted.
15. A method of making electrical steel strip without a hot band anneal characterized by low core loss and high permeability, comprising the steps of:
producing a slab with a composition consisting essentially of (% by weight):
______________________________________
C: up to 0.01
Si: 0.20-1.35
Al: 0.10-0.45
Mn: 0.10-1.0
S: up to 0.015
N: up to 0.006
Sb: up to 0.07
Sn: up to 0.12, and
the balance being substantially iron,
______________________________________
hot rolling the slab into a strip with a finishing temperature in the ferrite region;
coiling the strip at a temperature less than 1200° F.;
followed by cold rolling the strip, batch annealing the strip, and temper rolling the strip, wherein said temper rolling reduces the thickness of the strip by an amount ranging from about 0.25 to about 0.6%, and the strip has a permeability when stress relief annealed of at least 2500 Gauss/Oersted.
1. A method of making electrical steel strip characterized by low core loss and high permeability comprising the steps of:
producing a slab with a composition consisting essentially of (% by weight):
______________________________________
C: up to 0.01
Si: 0.20-1.35
Al: 0.10-0.45
Mn: 0.10-1.0
S: up to 0.015
N: up to 0.006
Sb: up to 0.07
Sn: up to 0.12, and
the balance being substantially iron,
______________________________________
hot rolling the slab into a strip with a finishing temperature in the austenite region;
coiling the strip at a temperature ranging from 1300°-1450° F.;
followed by the sequential steps of annealing the strip, cold rolling the strip, batch annealing the strip, and temper rolling the strip, wherein said temper rolling reduces the thickness of the strip by an amount ranging from about 0.25 to about 0.6% and the strip has a permeability when stress relief annealed of at least 2500 Gauss/Oersted.
8. A method of making electrical steel strip characterized by low core loss and high permeability comprising the steps of:
producing a slab with a composition consisting essentially of (% by weight):
______________________________________
C: up to 0.01
Si: 0.20-1.35
Al: 0.10-0.45
Mn: 0.10-1.0
S: up to 0.015
N: up to 0.006
Sb: up to 0.07
Sn: up to 0.12, and
the balance being substantially iron,
______________________________________
reheating the slab at a temperature ranging from 2100°-2275° F.;
hot rolling the slab into a strip with a finishing temperature in the ferrite region;
coiling the strip at a temperature less than 1200° F.;
followed by the sequential steps of annealing the strip, cold rolling the strip, batch annealing the strip, and temper rolling the strip, wherein said temper rolling reduces the thickness of the strip by an amount ranging from about 0.25 to about 0.6% and the strip has a permeability when stress relief annealed of at least 2500 Gauss/Oersted.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said step of temper rolling is carried out with a reduction in thickness ranging from about 0.25 to 0.5%.
3. The method of claim 1 further comprising stress relief annealing the strip.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein said temper rolling step is carried out at a reduction in thickness ranging from about 0.25 to 0.5%.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein a coil of the strip is heated during said batch annealing at a coil temperature of less than 1350° F.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein said permeability is obtained at an induction of less than about 1.5 Tesla.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the strip has a core loss when stress relief annealed of not greater than 0.13 watts/pound/mil.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein said step of temper rolling is carried out with a reduction in thickness ranging from about 0.25 to 0.5%.
10. The method of claim 8 wherein said step of coiling is carried out at a temperature of about 1000° F.
11. The method of claim 8 wherein said step of reheating the slab is carried out at a maximum preheat temperature of 2105° F., a maximum heating temperature of 2275° F., and a maximum soak temperature of 2275° F.
12. The method of claim 8 wherein said finishing temperature ranges from 1500°-1650° F.
13. The method of claim 8 including the step of stress relief annealing the strip after temper rolling.
14. The method of claim 13 wherein said temper rolling step is carried out at a reduction in thickness ranging from about 0.25 to 0.5%.
16. The method of claim 15 further comprising the step of stress relief annealing the strip.
17. The method of claim 16 wherein said temper rolling step is carried out at a reduction in thickness ranging from about 0.25 to 0.5%.
19. The method of claim 18 wherein said tension leveling elongates the strip by an amount ranging from about 0.25 to about 0.5%.
20. The method of claim 18 wherein the slab is hot rolled with a finishing temperature in the ferrite region.
21. The method of claim 18 wherein the slab is hot rolled with a finishing temperature in the austenite region, and the strip is coiled at a temperature ranging from 1300°-1450° F. and annealed between the pickling and cold rolling steps.
22. The method of claim 18 wherein the slab is reheated at a temperature less than 2300° F. and hot rolled with a finishing temperature in the ferrite region, and the strip is coiled at a temperature less than 1200° F. and annealed between the pickling and cold rolling steps.
23. The method of claim 19 further comprising stress relief annealing the strip.

This application is a continuation or U.S. Ser. No. 08/233,371, filed Apr. 26, 1994, which is now abandoned.

The present invention relates generally to the production of electrical steels, and more specifically to cold rolled, batch annealed and temper rolled motor lamination steels having good processing and magnetic properties, including low core loss and high permeability.

Desired electrical properties of steels used for making motor laminations are low core loss and high permeability. Those steels which are stress relief annealed after punching also should have properties which minimize distortion, warpage and delamination during the annealing of the lamination stacks.

Continuously annealed, silicon steels are conventionally used for motors, transformers, generators and similar electrical products. Continuously annealed silicon steels can be processed by techniques well known in the art to obtain low core loss and high permeability. Since these steels are substantially free of strain, they can be used in the as-punched condition (in which the steel as sold is commonly referred to as fully processed) or if better magnetic properties are desired the steel can be finally annealed by the electrical apparatus manufacturer after punching of the laminations (in which case the steel as sold is commonly referred to as semi-processed) with little danger of delamination, warpage, or distortion. A disadvantage of this practice is that the electrical steel sheet manufacturer is required to have a continuous annealing facility.

In order to avoid a continuous annealing operation, practices have been developed to produce cold rolled motor lamination steel by standard cold rolled sheet processing including batch annealing followed by temper rolling. In order to obtain the desired magnetic properties of high permeability and low core loss, it has been considered necessary to temper roll the steel with a heavy reduction in thickness on the order of 7%. Electrical steels processed by batch annealing and heavy temper rolling followed by a final stress relief anneal after the punching operations develop acceptable core loss and permeability through a complete recrystallization process. Unfortunately, the heavy temper rolling necessary for development of magnetic properties often results in delamination, warpage and distortion of the intermediate product when it is annealed, to the degree that it is unsuitable for service.

Fully-processed electrical steels are used by customers in the as-punched/stamped condition without a subsequent annealing operation being required. Standard cold-rolled electrical steels are unsuitable for most fully-processed applications due to strain remaining in the material. Fully processed materials are produced utilizing continuous anneal lines since no additional strain is required to provide acceptable flatness. Batch annealed materials, however, do not have acceptable flatness and require some strain simply to provide a flat product, which generally degrades the magnetic properties beyond a usable range. This strain is usually provided by conventional temper rolling.

For traditional cold-rolled motor lamination electrical steels, magnetic property performance is measured by standard Epstein testing at a nominal induction of 1.5 Tesla. However, once incorporated into an electrical device, the steel is not magnetically optimized for use at operating inductions below 1.5 Tesla.

Conventional hot rolling practices for non-hot band annealed cold-rolled motor lamination electrical steels have used high hot rolling finishing temperatures typically accomplished in the austenite region, and high coiling temperatures to promote "self-annealing" of the generated hot band. This practice has been previously determined to produce optimal magnetic properties. However, for some steel products specifically requiring improved cleanliness levels, this practice is unsatisfactory due to the formation of heavy subsurface oxidation. Using lower coiling temperatures has traditionally degraded magnetic properties, specifically permeability levels, due to less time-at-temperature for self-annealing.

An object of the present invention is to provide a batch annealed and temper rolled motor lamination steel having magnetic and mechanical properties similar to silicon electrical steels produced by continuous annealing without temper rolling.

A more particular object of the invention is to provide a batch annealed and temper rolled motor lamination steel which can be given a final stress relief anneal to achieve low core loss and high permeability without delamination, warpage or distortion of the intermediate product produced by the electrical product manufacturer.

Another object of the invention is to provide a batch annealed and temper rolled motor lamination steel which displays acceptable core loss and permeability without a final stress relief anneal operation.

The present invention applies to the production of batch annealed and temper rolled motor lamination steels which are semi-processed, i.e. steels which are given a final stress relief anneal after punching, and fully processed steels, i.e. steels which are used in the as-punched condition without a final stress relief anneal. In both instances, the process of the invention is characterized by a composition having an ultra low carbon content less than 0.01%, preferably less than 0.005%, and either leveling with preferably no change in thickness or light temper rolling with a reduction in thickness of less than 1.0%, and, preferably, less than 0.5%.

A preferred embodiment of the process provided by the invention for making both semi-processed and fully processed electrical steel comprises the steps of:

hot rolling a slab into a strip having a composition consisting essentially of (% by weight):

______________________________________
C: up to 0.01
Si: 0.20-1.35
Al: 0.10-0.45
Mn: 0.10-1.0
S: up to 0.015
N: up to 0.006
Sb: up to 0.07
Sn: up to 0.12The balance of the composition is substantially iron. More specifically compositions include less than 0.005% C, 0.25-1.0% Si, 0.20-0.35% Al, and less than 0.004% N. Suitable amounts of Sb are from 0.01-0.07% by weight, and, more preferably, from 0.03-0.05%. Less preferably, Sn may be used in a typical range of from 0.02-0.12%.

In accordance with the invention in this and in other embodiments, semi-processed steels may have a composition including a carbon content slightly higher than up to 0.01%. For example, a carbon content of up to 0.02% may be used.

In carrying out the process of the invention, a steel slab of the indicated composition is hot rolled into a strip, coiled, pickled and pickle band annealed. In the case of steels which are hot rolled with a finishing temperature in the ferrite region, the strip is preferably coiled at a temperature no greater than 1200° F., and preferably, no greater than 1050° F. The lower coiling temperatures result in less subsurface oxidation in the hot band. Coiling temperatures less than 1200° F. are preferred in order to retain the cold worked ferrite grain structure. In the case of steels which are hot rolled with a finishing temperature in the austenite region, coiling temperatures ranging from 1300°-1450° F. are preferred to promote self annealing. The pickle band anneal is carried out at a temperature that usually ranges from about 1350°-1600° F., and more specifically from 1400°-1550° F.

Following the pickle band anneal, the strip is cold rolled and batch annealed. The cold rolling reduction typically ranges from 70-80%. The batch anneal operation is carried out in a conventional manner at a coil temperature ranging from 1100°-1350° F.

In accordance with the invention, the batch annealed strip is temper rolled with a light reduction in thickness no greater than 1.0%, and, more preferably, no greater than 0.5%. In the case of fully processed steels, the light temper roll is important in obtaining low core loss and good permeability. In the case of semi-processed steels, the light temper roll is critical to avoiding delamination, warpage and distortion when the intermediate product is stress relief annealed.

The following Table 1 sets forth the magnetic properties of semi-processed steels which were given a stress relief anneal. The stress relief anneal was carried out in a conventional manner by soaking for 90 minutes at 1450° F. in an HNX atmosphere having a dew point of from 50°-55° F. The steels reported in Table 1 had a nominal composition of 0.35% Si, 0.25% Al, 0.55% Mn, 0.007% S, 0.004% N, 0.04% P, 0.03% Sb, and C in the amount indicated in the table, with the balance of the composition being substantially iron.

TABLE 1
__________________________________________________________________________
Magnetic Properties
Core Loss
Permeability
Thickness
Examples
% C
Processing (w/lb/mil)
(G/Oe)
(inch)
__________________________________________________________________________
A 0.005
Hot Rolling -- 1720° F. Finishing
0.127
4035 0.0233
and 1420° F. Coiling, Pickle,
Pickle Band Anneal, Cold Roll,
Batch Anneal, Temper Roll 0.5%
B 0.005
Hot Rolling -- 1530° F. Finishing
0.116
2829 0.0214
and 1000° F. Coiling, Pickle,
Pickle Band Anneal, Cold Roll,
Batch Anneal, Temper Roll 0.5%
C 0.02
Hot Rolling -- 1720° F. Finishing
0.123
2732 0.0220
and 1420° F. Coiling, Pickle, Cold
Roll, Batch Anneal, Temper Roll 7%
__________________________________________________________________________

The steels of Examples A and B were made according to the invention with a carbon content of 0.005% and a light temper reduction of 0.5%. Example A was hot rolled with a finishing temperature in the austenite region (1720° F.), while Example B was hot rolled with a finishing temperature in the ferrite region (1530° F.). It will be seen that rolling in the ferrite region improved the core loss while sacrificing some permeability.

Example C is a 0.02% C steel which was given a heavy temper reduction of 7.0%. A comparison of the properties of Examples A and C shows the improvement in permeability which is achieved with the lower carbon level and lighter temper reduction.

FIGS. 1 and 2 show the improved magnetic properties of semi-processed steels which are given a pickle band anneal in accordance with the invention compared to the properties of steels processed without a pickle band anneal. The steels had the same nominal composition as the steels reported in Table 1 and were given the same stress relief anneal.

As shown in FIG. 1, the two 0.005% C steels which were hot rolled with a finishing temperature in the austenite and ferrite regions and given a pickle band anneal exhibited the lowest core losses. The worst core loss occurred with a 0.02% carbon steel which was not given a pickle band anneal; a lower carbon content of 0.005% demonstrated better core loss.

Referring to FIG. 2, it will be seen that the two 0.005% carbon steels which were given a pickle band anneal exhibited the best permeability, while the two steels which were not given a pickle band anneal displayed lower permeabilities. The worst permeability was exhibited by a steel having a carbon content 0.02%.

The following Table 2 sets forth the magnetic properties of fully processed steels, i.e. steels which were not given a final stress relief anneal. The steels reported in Table 2 had the same nominal composition as the steels reported in Table 1.

TABLE 2
__________________________________________________________________________
Magnetic Properties
Core Loss
Permeability
Thickness
Examples
% C
Processing (w/lb/mil)
(G/Oe)
(inch)
__________________________________________________________________________
D 0.02
Hot Rolling -- 1720° F. Finishing
0.193
941 0.0280
and 1420° F. Coiling, Pickle,
Pickle Band Anneal, Cold Roll,
Batch Anneal, Temper Roll 0.5%
E 0.005
Hot Rolling -- 1530° F. Finishing
0.171
1244 0.0229
and 1420° F. Coiling, Pickle,
Pickle Band Anneal, Tandem
Roll, Batch Anneal, Temper Roll 0.5%
F 0.005
Hot Rolling -- 1530° F. Finishing
0.213
951 0.0217
and 1000° F. Coiling, Pickle,
Pickle Band Anneal, Cold Roll,
Batch Anneal, Temper Roll 0.5%
G 0.005
Hot Rolling -- 1530° F. Finishing
0.248
634 0.0215
and 1000° F. Coiling, Pickle,
Pickle Band Anneal, Cold Roll,
Batch Anneal, Temper Roll 7%
H 0.02
Hot Rolling -- 1720° F. Finishing
0.289
694 0.0253
and 1420° F. Coiling, Pickle, Cold
Roll, Batch Anneal, Temper Roll 7%
__________________________________________________________________________

The steel of Example D was made with a carbon content of 0.02%, while the steel of Example E was made in accordance with the invention from an ultra low carbon steel having a carbon content of 0.005%. These steels were similarly processed, including a pickle band anneal and a light temper reduction of 0.5%. It will be seen that lowering the carbon from 0.02% to 0.005% improved the as-punched/sheared magnetic properties.

The steel of Example F was an ultra low carbon steel which was hot rolled to a finishing temperature in the ferrite region and given a light temper reduction of 0.5%. It will be seen that the magnetic properties of Example E which was a steel finished in the austenite region were superior to those of steel of Example F finished in the ferrite region. Thus, for fully processed applications, the preferred process of the invention involves finishing in the austenite region.

The steel of Example G is an ultra low carbon content steel similar to Example F except that the steel of Example G was given a heavy temper reduction of 7.0%. It will be seen from a comparison of the magnetic properties of Examples F and G that the lowest core loss and highest permeability are achieved with a light temper reduction.

Example H is a 0.02% carbon steel which was not given a pickle band anneal and was finished with a heavy temper reduction of 7.0%. A comparison of Examples D and H shows the improvement in as-punched/sheared magnetic properties achieved with light temper rolling and pickle band annealing versus heavy temper rolling and no pickle band annealing.

In all embodiments of the invention, the light temper rolling process may be replaced by a leveling process. The present method is thus advantageous in that it does not require a continuous anneal facility or temper rolling apparatus, but rather only requires standard batch annealing and leveling facilities. The leveling process is preferably roller leveling, although tension leveling may also be used. The leveling process selectively elongates portions of the steel strip to proportionally stretch shorter areas beyond the yield point of the steel. This produces generally uniform so-called "fiber" length in the strip.

In the roller leveling process the strip moves in a wave-like path through up and down bends between upper and lower sets of parallel small diameter rolls. This makes the shorter fibers travel longer path lengths. The depths of the up/down bends are gradually reduced between the entrance and the exit of the leveling machine. This eliminates the curvature in the strip caused by entry into the leveling machine. All of the fibers have the same length upon exiting the leveling machine, the strip thus being flattened or leveled. Importantly, the strip thickness is not reduced in roller leveling in contrast to temper rolling. Replacing the temper rolling process with the leveling process is especially preferable when producing fully processed steel according to the methods of the invention.

Tension leveling produces a flat steel strip by stretching the strip lengthwise. Elongation of the strip up to 3.0% can occur on standard leveling process equipment. However, in the present invention strip elongation is controlled to less than 1.0% and, preferably, to less than 0.5%. Roller leveling produces steel having better magnetic properties compared to tension leveling.

One embodiment of the invention utilizing a leveling process relates to a method for the production of electrical steel strip characterized by low core loss and high permeability. This method employs an ultra low carbon steel, i.e. a steel having a carbon content less than 0.01%, and, preferably, no greater than 0.005% by weight. The steel composition consists generally of up to 0.01% C, 0.20-1.35% Si, 0.10-0.45% Al, 0.10-1.0% Mn, up to 0.015% S, up to 0.006% N, up to 0.07% Sb, and up to 0.12% Sn. The balance of the composition is substantially iron. More specific compositions include less than 0.005% C, 0.25-1.0% Si, 0.20-0.35% Al, and less than 0.004% N. Suitable amounts of Sb are from 0.01-0.07% by weight, and, more preferably, from 0.03-0.05%. Less preferably, Sn may be used in a typical range of from 0.02-0.12%.

In carrying out the process of the invention, a slab having the indicated composition is hot rolled into a strip in either the ferrite region or the austenite region. The strip is then subjected to the steps of coiling at 1300°-1450° F. for austenite hot rolling and 1000°-1350° F. for ferrite hot rolling, and pickling. Although it is not required, the strip may also be pickle band annealed. The pickle band anneal is carried out at a temperature that usually ranges from about 1350°-1600° F., and more specifically from 1400°-1550° F.

Following the pickling or pickle band anneal, the strip is cold rolled and batch annealed. The cold rolling reduction typically ranges from 70-80%. The batch anneal operation is carried out in a conventional manner at a coil temperature ranging from 1100°-1350° F.

The strip is then flattened with a leveling process. The leveling process includes roller leveling with no reduction in thickness of the strip, or tension leveling. The tension leveled strip has an elongation less than 1.0% and, preferably, less than 0.5%. Preferably, the strip is subjected to roller leveling with no reduction in thickness. In the case of semi-processed steel, this method also includes the step of a final stress relief anneal.

The following Table 3 sets forth the magnetic properties of fully processed steels, i.e., steels which were not given a final stress relief anneal. These steels were subjected to roller and tension leveling processes instead of a temper rolling process. The steels reported in Table 3 had the same nominal composition as the steels reported in Table 1.

TABLE 3
______________________________________
Magnetic
Properties
Core Loss Thickness t
Ex- Permeability (inch)
amples
% C Processing
(w/lb)
(G/Oe) final t
Δt %
______________________________________
I 0.005 Hot Rolling,
4.5-5.5
1000-1200
0.025
0
Coiling,
Pickle, Cold
Roll, Batch
Anneal,
Roller Level
J 0.005 Hot Rolling
5.7 800-900 0.028
0.2
Coiling,
Pickle, Cold
Roll, Batch
Anneal,
Tension
Level
______________________________________

It will be seen from Table 3 that both Examples I and J exhibited good magnetic properties. Roller leveling in Example I produced higher permeability and lower core loss than the tension leveling in Example J.

Another embodiment of the invention relates to a method of making electrical steel strip for application in electrical devices operating at an induction level of less than 1.5 Tesla, characterized by low core loss and high permeability. This method uses an ultra low carbon steel, i.e. a steel having a carbon content less than 0.01%, and, preferably, no greater than 0.005% by weight. The steel composition consists generally of up to 0.01% C, 0.20-1.35% Si, 0.10-0.45% Al, 0.10-1.0% Mn, up to 0.015% S, up to 0.006% N, up to 0.07% Sb, and up to 0.12% Sn. The balance of the composition is substantially iron. More specific compositions include less than 0.005% C, 0.25-1.0% Si, 0.20-0.35% Al, and less than 0.004% N. Suitable amounts of Sb are from 0.01-0.07% by weight, and, more preferably, from 0.03-0.05%. Less preferably, Sn may be used in a typical range of from 0.02-0.12%.

In carrying out this method of making electrical steel strip at an induction level of less than 1.5 Tesla, a slab of the indicated composition is reheated at a temperature less than 2300° F. During reheating, the steel is passed through a primary zone, an intermediate zone and a soak zone of a reheat furnace. The maximum primary zone temperature is 2105° F., the maximum intermediate zone temperature is 2275° F., and the maximum soak zone temperature is 2275° F.

The steel slab is then hot rolled into a strip with a finishing temperature in the ferrite region. This ferrite finishing temperature is preferably 1500°-1650° F. However, it will be understood that the finishing temperatures may vary according to the grade of steel used in this and the other embodiments of the invention.

The strip is then coiled at a temperature less than 1200° F. More preferably, the coiling temperature is about 1000° F. The lower coiling temperatures result in less subsurface oxidation in the hot band and, because the strips are hot rolled in the ferrite region, retain the cold worked ferrite grain structure.

The strip is then pickled and pickle band annealed. The pickle hand anneal is carried out at a temperature that usually ranges from about 1350°-1600° F., and more specifically from 1400°-1550° F.

Following the pickle band anneal, the strip is cold rolled and batch annealed. The cold rolling reduction typically ranges from 70-80%. The batch anneal operation is carried out in a conventional manner at a coil temperature ranging from 1100°-1350° F.

In accordance with the invention, the batch annealed strip is preferably temper rolled with a light reduction in thickness no greater than 1.0%, and, more preferably, no greater than 0.5%. In the case of fully processed steels, the light temper roll is important in obtaining low core loss and good permeability. In the case of semi-processed steels, the light temper roll is critical to avoiding delamination, warpage and distortion when the intermediate product is stress relief annealed.

FIGS. 3 and 4 show electrical steel strip made according to the method of the invention characterized by low core loss, and by high permeability, in particular, at an induction level of less than 1.5 Tesla. These figures show the effect of the coiling temperature on magnetic properties.

Referring to FIG. 3, it will be seen that the ferrite finished product with a coiling temperature of 1000° F. resulted in the best permeability, while the austenite finished product with a coiling temperature of 1050° F. had better permeability than steel austenite finished and coiled at 1420° F., which coiling temperature was outside the range of this embodiment of the invention. The highest permeability of about 8800 Gauss/Oersted was obtained by ferrite finished steel having a coiling temperature of about 1000° F. at an induction of less than about 1.5 Tesla.

Referring to FIG. 4, it will be seen that at any particular induction at least between about 5000-19000 Gauss, steel ferrite finished and coiled at 1000° F. had lower core loss than steel austenite finished and coiled at 1050° F. and 1420° F.

Yet another embodiment of the invention relates to a process of making electrical steel strip without a hot band anneal, characterized by low core loss and high permeability. This method employs an ultra low carbon steel, i.e. a steel having a carbon content less than 0.01 %, and, preferably, no greater than 0.005% by weight. The steel composition consists generally of up to 0.01% C, 0.20-1.35% Si, 0.10-0.45% Al, 0.10-1.0% Mn, up to 0.015% S, up to 0.006% N, up to 0.07% Sb, and up to 0.12% Sn. The balance of the composition is substantially iron. More specific compositions include less than 0.005% C, 0.25-1.0% Si, 0.20-0.35% Al, and less than 0.004% N. Suitable amounts of Sb are from 0.01-0.07% by weight, and, more preferably, from 0.03-0.05%. Less preferably, Sn may be used in a typical range of from 0.02-0.12%.

In carrying out the process of the invention, a steel slab of the indicated composition is hot rolled into a strip with a finishing temperature in the ferrite region.

The strip is then coiled at an intermediate temperature ranging from 1100°-1350° F. and, preferably, about 1200° F. No hot band anneal, for example, a pickle band anneal is necessary after this coiling step.

Following the coiling, the strip is cold rolled and batch annealed. The cold rolling reduction typically ranges from 70-80%. The batch anneal operation is carried out in a conventional manner at a coil temperature ranging from 1100°-1350° F.

In accordance with the invention, the batch annealed strip is preferably temper rolled with a light reduction in thickness no greater than 1.0%, and, preferably, no greater than 0.5%. In the case of fully processed steels, the light temper roll is important in obtaining low core loss and high permeability. In the ease of semi-processed steels, the light temper roll is critical to avoiding delamination, warpage and distortion when the intermediate product is stress relief annealed.

FIGS. 5 and 6 show electrical steel strip made according to this method of the invention characterized by low core loss and high permeability. These Figures show that for steel produced according to the method of the invention with a hot roll finishing temperature in the ferrite region and with no hot band anneal, better magnetic properties are often obtained at intermediate coiling temperatures than at a lower temperature.

In particular, hot rolling with a ferrite finishing temperature followed by intermediate temperature coiling results in self-annealing of the steel, during which the ferrite recrystallizes to a relatively large grain size. This promotes improved magnetic properties in non-hot band annealed electrical steels. Moreover, the lower coiling temperatures prevent the extensive growth of subsurface oxidation in the cooling hot band, and thus yield an improved level of cleanliness upon finish processing.

Referring to FIG. 5 it will be seen that for any induction at least between about 14000 and 16400 Gauss, steels coiled according to the invention at intermediate temperatures of 1200° F. and 1350° F. had higher permeability than steel coiled at 1000° F., outside the intermediate coiling temperature range of this embodiment of the invention.

Referring to FIG. 6, it will be seen that for any induction at least between about 15400 and 18000 Gauss, steels coiled according to the invention at intermediate temperatures of 1200° F. and 1350° F. had lower core loss than steel coiled at 1000° F., outside the intermediate coiling temperature range of this embodiment of the invention.

Many modifications and variations of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing detailed description. Therefore, it is to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention can be practiced otherwise than as specifically disclosed.

Lauer, Barry A., Beatty, Gerald F., Larson, Ann M. R., Blotzer, Richard J.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
6503339, Feb 20 1998 Thyssen Krupp Stahl AG Method for producing non-grain oriented magnetic sheet steel
Patent Priority Assignee Title
2067036,
2303343,
2351922,
2412041,
2986485,
3130088,
3188250,
3212942,
3297434,
3415696,
3620856,
3770517,
3873380,
3892604,
3895974,
3923560,
3932237, Oct 30 1973 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Method for forming an insulating glass film on surfaces of an oriented silicon steel sheet
3940299, Oct 31 1973 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Method for producing single-oriented electrical steel sheets having a high magnetic induction
3954521, Dec 23 1968 PITTSBURGH NATIONAL BANK Method of producing grain oriented silicon steel
4066479, Jul 08 1972 Nippon Steel Corporation Process for producing non-directional electric steel sheets free from ridging
4123298, Jan 14 1977 ARMCO INC , A CORP OF OHIO Post decarburization anneal for cube-on-edge oriented silicon steel
4204890, Nov 11 1977 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Method of producing non-oriented silicon steel sheets having an excellent electromagnetic property
4306922, Sep 07 1979 ORB Electrical Steels Limited Electro magnetic steels
4319936, Dec 08 1980 ARMCO INC , A CORP OF OHIO Process for production of oriented silicon steel
4337101, Aug 18 1980 PITTSBURGH NATIONAL BANK Processing for cube-on-edge oriented silicon steel
4390378, Jul 02 1981 Inland Steel Company Method for producing medium silicon steel electrical lamination strip
4666534, Jan 27 1982 Nippon Steel Corporation Non-oriented electrical steel sheet having a low watt loss and a high magnetic flux density and a process for producing the same
4772341, Jan 25 1985 UOP, DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS A NY GENERAL PARTNERSHIP; KATALISTIKS INTERNATIONAL, INC Low loss electrical steel strip
4979997, May 29 1989 Nippon Steel Corporation Process for producing grain-oriented electrical steel sheet having superior magnetic and surface film characteristics
5009726, Mar 04 1988 NKK Corporation Method of making non-oriented silicon steel sheets having excellent magnetic properties
5013372, Jun 18 1987 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Semi-process non-oriented electromagnetic steel strip having low core loss and high magnetic permeability, and method of making
5045129, Dec 21 1989 FAR ACCIAI S R L Process for the production of semiprocessed non oriented grain electrical steel
5049205, Sep 28 1989 Nippon Steel Corporation Process for preparing unidirectional silicon steel sheet having high magnetic flux density
5062905, Aug 18 1989 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION A CORP OF JAPAN Method of producing non-oriented magnetic steel plate having high magnetic flux density
5096510, Dec 11 1989 ARMCO INC , A CORP OF OHIO Thermal flattening semi-processed electrical steel
5102478, Feb 23 1989 NKK Corporation Method of making non-oriented magnetic steel strips
5108521, Feb 21 1989 NKK Corporation Method of making non-oriented magnetic steel strips
5143561, Jul 21 1987 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Method of producing grain oriented silicon steel sheets having improved magnetic properties and a continuous intermediate annealing equipment therefor
5145533, Mar 31 1989 Nippon Steel Corporation Process for producing grain-oriented electrical steel sheet having excellent magnetic characteristic
FR1438853,
FR1550182,
JP1198428,
JP4280921,
JP63210237,
JP6347332,
RU631548,
/////////////////////////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jul 21 1997LTV Steel Company, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Apr 12 2002LTV STREEL COMPANY, INC INTERNATIONAL STEEL GROUP INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0139220958 pdf
May 22 2002INTERNATIONAL STEEL GROUP, INC GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS AGENTHOLDINGS PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT0129830297 pdf
May 07 2003GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS AGENTINTERNATIONAL STEEL GROUP, INC RELEASE AND TERMINATION OF HOLDINGS PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT0136530520 pdf
May 07 2003INTERNATIONAL STEEL GROUP, INC CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENT, THEPLEDGE AND SECURITY AGREEMENT0136630415 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTINTERNATIONAL STEEL GROUP, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG CLEVELAND WEST PROPERTIES, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG SOUTH CHICAGO & INDIANA HARBOR RAILWAY COMPANYRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG EGL HOLDING COMPANYRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG VENTURE, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG SALES, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG RAILWAYS, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG Technologies, IncRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG HIBBING, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTBETHLEHEM HIBBING CORPORATIONRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG CLEVELAND WEST, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG CLEVELAND WORKS RAILWAY COMPANYRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG LACKAWANNA INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG ACQUISITION INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG CLEVELAND INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG HENNEPIN, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG INDIANA HARBOR INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG WARREN INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG RIVERDALE INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG PLATE INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG SPARROWS POINT INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG PIEDMONT INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG BURNS HARBOR INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Jun 13 2007THE CIT GROUP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTISG STEELTON INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0194320170 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Mar 15 2000M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Mar 20 2000ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Aug 25 2004M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Sep 01 2004ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Sep 01 2004RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned.
Sep 15 2008REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Jan 20 2009M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.
Jan 20 2009M1556: 11.5 yr surcharge- late pmt w/in 6 mo, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Nov 24 20014 years fee payment window open
May 24 20026 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Nov 24 2002patent expiry (for year 4)
Nov 24 20042 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Nov 24 20058 years fee payment window open
May 24 20066 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Nov 24 2006patent expiry (for year 8)
Nov 24 20082 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Nov 24 200912 years fee payment window open
May 24 20106 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Nov 24 2010patent expiry (for year 12)
Nov 24 20122 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)