A solar control film having low visible light transmittance and low visible light reflectance is comprised of two or more transparent substrates each bearing a thin, transparent, discontinuous, incoherent film of metal having low visible light reflectance and a degree of visible light blocking capacity, the substrates being so assembled and laminated into a composite that the visible light blocking capacities of the metal films are effectively combined to provide a composite having low visible light transmittance. Performance characteristics are enhanced by providing on one or more of the substrates a transparent coating of high refractive index underlying the metal film. The material of high refractive index is preferably a synthetic high oxygen content oxide of bismuth, which facilitates efficient and economical production of the solar control film.
|
1. A solar control film having low visible light transmittance and low visible light reflectance comprising .
a first sheet of transparent substrate material having thereon a thin, incoherent, transparent film of metal effective to partially block visible light transmittance and having a preselected low visible light reflectance, a second sheet of transparent substrate material having thereon a thin, incoherent, transparent film of metal effective to partially block visible light transmittance and having a preselected low visible light reflectance, and a layer of adhesive bonding said first and second sheets to one another with the films of metal facing one another and separated and optically decoupled from one another, the bonded sheets forming a composite film having a combined visible light transmittance blocking effect equal approximately to the sum of the blocking effects of the incoherent films and visible light reflectance substantially equal to the visible light reflectance of just one of the incoherent films, the visible light reflectance of each incoherent film being such that the visible light reflectance of the composite film on clear glass does not exceed about 12% when visible light transmittance is within the range of from about 35% up to about 50% or less, and does not exceed about 15% when visible light transmittance is about 35% or less and does not exceed about 20% when visible light transmittance is about 25% or less.
12. A method of making solar control films having low visible light transmittance and low visible light reflectance comprising the steps of
depositing onto a transparent substrate a thin, incoherent, transparent coating of metal that is effective to partially block visible light transmittance through the coated substrate and that is sufficiently thin and incoherent as to have a preselected low visible light reflectance, assembling into a composite film a plurality of the coated substrates such that the incoherent metal coatings face one another internally of the composite film and are separated and optically decoupled from one another and such that the metal coatings together provide a combined visible light blocking effect sufficient to provide a preselected low level of visible light transmittance through the composite film, and laminating the coated substrates to one another to provide a composite film having a combined visible light transmittance blocking effect equal approximately to the sum of the blocking effects of the incoherent metal coatings and low visible light reflectance substantially equal to the visible light reflectance of just one of the incoherent metal coatings, the visible light reflectance of each incoherent metal coating being such that the visible light reflectance of the composite film does not exceed about 20% when visible light transmittance is no greater than about 25%, on clear glass does not exceed about 15% when visible light transmittance is no greater than about 35% and does not exceed about 12% when visible light. transmittance is within the range of from about 35% up to about 50%.
8. A solar control film having low visible light transmittance and low visible light reflectance comprising
a first sheet of transparent substrate material bearing thereon a thin transparent layer of a material of high refractive index and a thin, transparent, incoherent coating of metal overlying the material of high refractive index, the metal film being effective to partially block visible light transmittance through the coated substrate and having a preselected low visible light reflectance, a second sheet of transparent substrate material bearing thereon a thin transparent layer of a material of high refractive index and a thin, transparent, incoherent coating of metal overlying the material of high refractive index, the metal film being effective to partially block visible light transmittance through the coated substrate and having a preselected low visible light reflectance, and a layer of adhesive bonding said first and second sheets to one another with the films of metal facing one another and optically decoupled and separated from one another, the bonded sheets forming a composite film having a combined visible light transmittance blocking effect equal approximately to the sum of the blocking effects of the incoherent films and low visible light reflectance substantially equal to the visible light reflectance of just one of the incoherent films, the visible light reflectance of each incoherent film being such that the visible light reflectance of the composite film does not exceed about 20% when visible light transmittance is no greater than about 25%, on clear glass does not exceed about 15% when visible light transmittance is no greater than about 35% and does not exceed about 12% when visible light transmittance is within the range of from about 35% up to about 50%.
2. A solar control film as set forth in
3. A solar control film as set forth in
4. A solar control film as set forth in
5. A solar control film as set forth in
6. A solar control film as set forth in
7. A solar control film as set forth in
9. A solar control film as set forth in
10. A solar control film as set forth in
11. A solar control film as set forth in
13. A method as set forth in
14. A method as set forth in
15. A method as set forth in
16. A method as set forth in
the range of from about 20% to about 50%.21. A solar control film having low visible light transmittance and low visible light reflectance comprising a first sheet of transparent substrate material having thereon a thin, incoherent, transparent film of metal effective to partially block visible light transmittance and having a preselected low visible light reflectance, a second sheet of transparent substrate material having thereon a thin incoherent, transparent film of metal effective to partially block visible light transmittance and having a preselected low visible light reflectance, and a layer of adhesive bonding said first and second sheets to one another with the films of metal facing one another and separated and optically decoupled from one another, the bonded sheets forming a composite film having a combined visible light transmittance blocking effect equal approximately to the sum of the blocking effects of the incoherent films and visible light reflectance substantially equal to the visible light reflectance of just one of the incoherent films, the composite film having on clear glass a visible light transmittance within the range of 20% to 50% and a visible light reflectance no greater than 15% when visible light transmittance is within the range of 20% to 35% and no greater than 12% when visible light transmittance is within the range of 35% to 50%. |
The present invention relates to optical devices, such as solar energy control window films, having low visual light transmission and low visual light reflection, and to methods of making the same.
The glass tinting industry desires a class of solar energy control coatings or films with a visual light transmission (VLT) clear glass gold, silver, nickel and chromium and, nickel-chromium alloys of the same, and stainless steel. Sputtering of these metals is very straight forward and readily and quickly achieved, particularly in view of the thinness of the film, i.e., 1-20 nm. The metal is preferably sputtered in an inert gas partial pressure atmosphere introduced into the substantially enclosed station 58 via the inlet 43.
The materials of high refractive index customarily employed in optical films are slower and more difficult to deposit, especially titanium oxide which is the material of highest index. In order to enhance the rate of deposition of the oxide to keep pace with the rate of deposition of the metal film, it may prove necessary to add more magnetron cathodes at station 56 and/or to add another oxide deposition station intermediate the stations 56 and 58. As is known, the compound of high refractive index may itself comprise the target 56c, or a target of the metal per se may be reactively sputtered in the presence of a partial pressure atmosphere of reactive gas, e.g. oxygen and/or nitrogen, introduced to the station(s) 56 via the inlet 42. Even so, because the deposition of TiO2 onto a substrate is such a slow and tedious process and the resultant product is so expensive, economies of production may dictate use of a different oxide or nitride, even though the refractive index is significantly less than desired.
Bismuth oxide Bi2 O3, though referenced in the literature for use in the far infrared range, is not considered an optical material in the visual range because it is highly absorbing in the visual spectrum, and therefore has not found application in the commercial solar film market.
The present invention is predicated in part upon the discovery that formation of a synthesized BiOx having a high level of oxidation (x=>1.7) produces a thin film that is not highly absorbing, and that provides a very high index of refraction comparable to that of TiO2. More importantly, in the context of the process of the invention, the synthetic BiOx has a rate of deposition that is 25 or more times faster than that of TiO2, thereby eliminating the economic impediment of TiO2 and producing a better performing and more acceptable product.
Deposition of the BiOx film may be accomplished by reactive sputter deposition, actuated reactive evaporation deposition and vacuum arcing deposition, but reactive sputter deposition, as illustrated in FIG. 7, is presently preferred. Specifically, the target 56c is comprised of bismuth and is sputtered within a partial pressure atmosphere of oxygen, the oxygen partial pressure being variable to produce a layer of synthetic bismuth oxide having an atomic ratio of oxygen to bismuth of from at least 1.7 up to about 2.5, i.e., BiOx (x=1.7-2.5).
The thickness of the synthesized BiOx (x=1.7-2.5) film deposited on the substrate 50 may be varied from about 0.1 to about 50 nm (10-500 Å) depending upon the performance characteristics desired. The recommended thickness range is from 0.1 to 10 nm for solar films having a VLT=>35%, and from 10-50 nm for solar films having a VLT=<35%. The rate of production will generally vary from about 20 feet per minute (fpm) for thicker films up to about 50 fpm for thinner films. For most applications contemplated by the present invention, a film thickness of about 40 nm applied at a substrate speed of about 50 fpm will produce a very acceptable product.
However, the desired extent of oxidation of the bismuth will also enter into the production equation. FIG. 8 comprises a graphic correlation of the rate of reactive sputter deposition of synthesized oxides of bismuth, BiOx, the atomic ratio of oxygen to bismuth in the oxide, and the oxygen partial pressure within the sputter deposition vacuum chamber. In FIG. 8, the oxygen partial pressure (OPP) is plotted along the abscissa, the dynamic deposition rate (DDR) along the left hand ordinate and the atomic ratio (AR) along the right hand ordinate. The descending curve comprises the DDR and the ascending curve the AR. The DDR was calculated from two test runs. The AR was determined by Helium Ion Beam Rutherford Back Scattering measurements and Auger Electron Spectroscopy profiles, calibrated against commercial bulk Bi2 O3. For reasons not presently known, Auger profiles have consistently yielded higher AR values than Rutherford Back Scattering measurements, especially at higher AR values. Nevertheless, it is noted as a general observation that as the OPP increases, the AR rises and the film becomes clear when the AR equals or exceeds 1.7.
As graphically portrayed in FIG. 8, BiOx with an AR of 1.8 may be deposited at an oxygen partial pressure of about 7.5 E-5T (7.5×10-5 Torr.) and a DDR of about 3.5 nm×cm**2/j (thickness in nm times area in sq. cm. divided by energy in Joules); and BiOx with an AR of 2.5 may be produced at an OPP of 12E-5T and a DDR of about 2.5 nm×cm**2/j. In contrast, the DDR for reactive sputtering of TiO2 is typically about 0.1 nm×cm**2/j. Thus, the synthetic BiOx (x=>1.7) provided by the invention may be deposited 25 to 35 times faster than TiO2, which is a very significant economic advantage, especially in view of the fact that the refractive indices are essentially the same. Moreover, the enhanced speed of deposition of BiOx facilitates deposition of the oxide at the same web speed as deposition of the metal, thereby to provide for very economical production of the solar control films of the invention.
Taking into consideration production speed and the quality of coating desired, a preferred AR will fall within the range of 1.8 to 2.2.
Auger profile measurements establish that the thin BiOx coating on the substrate is very uniform. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) photographs at a magnification of 50,000 times further reveal that as the OPP is increased to produce a BiOx film having an AR of 1.7 or greater, the surface of the coating becomes extremely smooth and uniform, thereby significantly reducing absorption and providing a film of high refractive index ideal for practice of the invention.
The invention thus provides for economical mass production of highly durable solar control films having low visual light transmission and low visual light reflection.
The objects and advantages of the invention have therefore been shown to be attained in a convenient, economical and practical manner.
While preferred embodiments of the invention have been herein illustrated and described, it is to be appreciated that various changes, rearrangements and modifications may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention, as defined by the appended claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6452652, | Jun 12 1998 | National Semiconductor Corporation | Light absorbing thin film stack in a light valve structure |
6953618, | Jun 14 1999 | Eastman Performance Films, LLC | Light-stable colored transparent composite films |
7057805, | Oct 22 2001 | Commonwealth Laminating & Coating, Inc. | Solar control film containing carbon black and process for preparing the solar control film |
7063893, | Apr 29 2002 | CARDINAL CG COMPANY | Low-emissivity coating having low solar reflectance |
7067195, | Apr 29 2002 | CARDINAL CG COMPANY | Coatings having low emissivity and low solar reflectance |
7122252, | May 16 2002 | CARDINAL CG COMPANY | High shading performance coatings |
7138182, | Jul 31 2003 | CARDINAL CG COMPANY | Temperable high shading performance coatings |
7229684, | Jun 14 1999 | Eastman Performance Films, LLC | Light-stable colored transparent composite films |
7534497, | Jul 31 2002 | CARDINAL CG COMPANY | Temperable high shading performance coatings |
7670641, | Apr 28 2006 | CARDINAL CG COMPANY | Coatings having low emissivity and low solar reflectance |
7687149, | May 16 2002 | CARDINAL CG COMPANY | High shading performance coatings |
7758915, | Apr 28 2006 | CARDINAL CG COMPANY | Low-emissivity coating having low solar reflectance |
7992917, | Nov 20 2003 | MADICO, INC | Protective laminates for windshields |
8172300, | Nov 21 2003 | MADICO, INC | Protective laminates |
9023162, | Nov 21 2003 | MADICO, INC | Method of manufacturing a windshield having a protective laminate |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3556640, | |||
4045125, | Jun 27 1974 | Etat Francias | Band filters for use in protective glasses |
4634637, | Nov 22 1985 | ABLECO FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Solar control film |
4797317, | Sep 27 1984 | ABLECO FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Solar control window film |
4799745, | Jun 30 1986 | Southwall Technologies, Inc.; SOUTHWALL TECHNOLOGIES, INC , A CORP OF DE | Heat reflecting composite films and glazing products containing the same |
4978181, | Jul 10 1987 | Kajima Corporation; Tachikawa Corporation; Teijin Chemicals Ltd | Sunshade |
5071206, | Jun 30 1986 | SOUTHWALL TECHNOLOGIES, 1029 CORPORATION WAY, PALO ALTO, CA , 94303, A CORP OF CA | Color-corrected heat-reflecting composite films and glazing products containing the same |
5306547, | Dec 14 1990 | SOUTHWALL TECHNOLOGIES INC | Low transmission heat-reflective glazing materials |
JP63265625, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Nov 20 1995 | DEPOSITION TECHNOLOGIES, INC | MSC SPECIALTY FILMS, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 009214 | /0359 | |
Jun 02 1998 | MSC Specialty Films, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jun 29 2001 | MSC SPECIALTY FILMS, INC | N V BEKAERT S A | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 026522 | /0015 | |
Dec 20 2011 | N V BEKAERT S A | Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Chaineux | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027587 | /0673 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Nov 01 1999 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Nov 01 1999 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 30 2003 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 30 2007 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Nov 05 2007 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 21 2002 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 21 2003 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 21 2003 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 21 2005 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 21 2006 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 21 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 21 2007 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 21 2009 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 21 2010 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 21 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 21 2011 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 21 2013 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |