A roll for selective use as either a support drum or as a rider roll in a winder for winding a traveling paper web into a relatively large diameter wound web roll has a body with an outer, elastomeric cover. The elastomeric cover includes a pattern, open to the surface, arranged such that the percent of volumetric void for a unit of cover volume is such that the effective hardness of the cover ranges between about 30 Shore "A" to about 55 Shore "A" where the roll is a support drum, and between about 40 Shore "A" to about 65 Shore "A" when the roll is a rider roll. In addition, the elastomeric material has an absolute hardness of about 65 Shore "A", or less, for a support drum, and about 75 Shore "A", or less, for a rider roll, and a poisson's ratio of between about 0.47 to about 0.499.
|
9. A roll for use in a winder for a papermaking machine as a rider roll to apply a pressure nip to a web roll being wound in the winder from a traveling paper web, the rider roll comprising, in combination:
a shaft body member having an outer surface and a longitudinal axis; a cover on the outer surface of the body member, the cover having an outer surface defining the cylindrical shape and surface of the rider roll and comprising an elastomeric material having a poisson's ratio of about 0.47, or greater, and an absolute hardness of about 75 Shore "A", or less; a pattern in the outer surface of the cover, the cover having a volumetric void, the pattern arranged such that the percent of the volumetric void for a unit volume of an outer portion of the cover which includes the volumetric void and the pattern is such that the cover has an effective hardness of about 65 Shore "A", or less; whereby an instant center is created which is within the wound web roll cover.
1. A roll for use in a winder for a papermaking machine as a support drum for winding a traveling paper web into a wound web roll by maintaining supporting nip engagement therewith, the support drum comprising, in combination:
a shaft body member having an outer surface and a longitudinal axis; a cover on the outer surface of the body member, the cover having an outer surface defining the cylindrical shape and surface of the support drum and comprising an elastomeric material having a poisson's ratio of about 0.47, or greater, and an absolute hardness of about 65 Shore "A", or less; a pattern in the outer surface of the cover, the cover having a volumetric void open to the outer surface thereof and intermediate the pattern, the pattern arranged such that the percent of the volumetric void for a unit volume of an outer portion of the cover which includes the volumetric void and the pattern is such that the cover has an effective hardness of about 55 Shore "A", or less; whereby a nip instant center is created which is within the wound web roll cover.
2. A roll for use in a winder as set forth in
3. A support drum roll for use in a winder as set forth in
the percent of the volumetric void for a unit volume of the cover, as defined in
4. A support drum roll for use in a winder as set forth in
the poisson's ratio of the elastomeric material ranges from about 0.47 to about 0.499; the percent of the volumetric void for a unit volume of the cover, as defined in
5. A roll for use in a winder as set forth in
6. A roll for use in a winder as set forth in
7. A roll for use in a winder as set forth in
8. A roll for use in a winder as set forth in
10. A rider roll for use in a winder as set forth in
the percent of the volumetric void for a unit volume of the cover, as defined in
11. A rider roll for use in a winder as set forth in
the poisson's ratio of the elastomeric material ranges from about 0.47 to about 0.499; the percent of the volumetric void for a unit volume of the cover, as defined in
|
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the winding of a traveling paper web, such as is produced by a papermaking machine. More particularly, this invention relates to the construction of either a support drum or a rider roll, or both, for use in a winder for winding such a traveling paper web. Still more particularly, this invention relates to the construction of a support drum or rider roll having an elastomeric cover having a unique combination of Poisson's ratio, absolute hardness and effective hardness to provide a relatively soft nip in support of the wound paper roll while utilizing a relatively hard elastomeric cover.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In the papermaking industry, a common form of winder for winding the substantially endless paper web produced by the papermaking machine comprises a pair of spaced, parallel support drums for supporting the wound paper roll being wound from the traveling paper web.
It is known in the papermaking industry to have winder support drums with grooves to permit the paper roll being wound to be turned with the purpose of encouraging less slippage between it and the support drum. Also, such grooves may provide a means to reduce any boundary layer air film between the drum and the paper roll. Such grooves can take several forms, such as, for example, spiral grooves, Chevron, or herringbone patterned.
It has also been contemplated to cover the support drums with an elastomeric material, such as rubber, in an attempt to provide a larger support area for the increasingly heavy wound paper roll on the cylindrical surface of the support drum. Some of such rubber covered drums have also been grooved. Examples of prior art types of grooving and support drum covers are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,867,550; 3,098,619; 4,541,585 and British Patent No. 417,769. While the prior art includes roll and support drums having elastomeric covers, the practice heretofore in the papermaking industry was to construct these covers with a hardness of 85 Shore "A", or greater; only rarely have covers had a hardness as soft as 75 Shore "A". On the Shore "A" scale, readings approaching 100 are relatively hard, and readings approaching 25 are relatively soft.
Grooved winder drums, grooved elastomeric covered winder drums and elastomeric covered winder drums all have some operational advantages and efficiencies which are generally associated with their ability to better support the paper roll being wound with less slippage, less internal stress, and more control of the winding process and desired parameters. This is particularly true during periods when the rotational speed of the wound paper roll is changing. However, such prior configurations also had inherent deficiencies.
If the non-grooved elastomeric material was too hard, it essentially operated like a solid metallic support drum, which negated any advantage, such as a larger support area, that an elastomeric cover provides. Softer elastomeric covers, which might provide such a larger wound web roll support area, were not believed to be economically or operationally viable.
Therefore, while fundamental configurations, such as providing support drums with elastomeric covers and grooving such drums, have long been known, there has been a long-felt need for a paper winder support drum having a grooved elastomeric cover which provides a relatively softer, wider nip and relatively long service during operation.
The problems, deficiencies and inefficiencies associated with prior art types of winder support drums having elastomeric covers have been obviated by this invention. In the winder support drum of this invention, an elastomeric cover is provided which has a unique combination of physical parameters and properties which enable it to operate continuously while supporting a wound paper roll on its grooved elastomeric surface. These properties include a Poisson's ratio for the elastomeric material of about 0.47-0.499; an absolute hardness of the elastomeric material of about 65 Shore "A", or less, for support drums; an absolute hardness of about 75 Shore "A", or less, for rider rolls; and a surface pattern in the elastomeric cover which is so arranged that the percent of volumetric void for a unit volume of the cover is such that the effective hardness of the cover is much less than the intrinsic hardness of the cover. The absolute hardness range for rider roll elastomeric covers is somewhat higher on the Shore "A" scale (i.e. harder) due to the higher nip cycle frequency of the rider rolls which is a function of the differences in roll diameters between support drums and rider rolls (support drums have larger diameters).
The groove pattern in the cover surface need not have any particular configuration. While a dimpled surface pattern on the elastomeric cover is functionally superior, a diamond-shaped pattern or a tight spiral groove pattern is preferred. A symmetrical diamond pattern minimizes roll steering and thrusting forces. A tight spiral groove pattern minimizes noise and is more economical to make.
A cover having a plurality of individual circular impressions, each extending ring-like about the circumference of the roll, is not preferred due to the likelihood that the superpositioning of a similarly depressed layers will result in a very unattractive ridge pattern on the surface of the wound web roll.
These characteristics of the winder support drum construction enable the instant center associated with the nip between the wound paper roll and the support drum to be shifted from inside the wound paper roll to inside the elastomeric cover of the support drum. This combination of physical parameters and characteristics of the support drum also result in an effectively much softer cover, which is desirable from a standpoint of lowering the unit pressure on the support drum surface, while providing the durability and longevity of a much harder cover.
It is contemplated that the absolute and effective hardnesses of rolls used as support drums in a two-drum type of winder do not both have to be the same. Thus, it is contemplated that the effective hardness of the back drum cover, commonly referred to as the number one drum in the papermaking industry, might be harder than the effective hardness of the cover on the front drum (number two drum).
The principles of this invention can also be applied to the rider roll in a winder for winding a wound paper web roll. Therefore, in this description, the covers described can refer to either a support drum or a rider roll which are intended to be referred to by the generic term "roll" in this description.
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide an improved support drum or rider roll for a winder for winding a traveling paper web into a wound roll.
Another object of this invention is to provide an improved winder support drum or rider roll having an elastomeric cover.
Still another object of this invention is to provide an improved winder support drum or rider roll having an elastomeric cover with an open pattern in its surface.
Yet another object of this invention is to provide paper web winding apparatus for reducing interlayer shear stress between layers of the web in the wound web roll.
An advantage of this invention is a winder support drum or rider roll having an elastomeric cover which has an absolute hardness which is relatively high, and an effective hardness which is relatively low.
A feature of this invention is an elastomeric covered winder drum where the elastomer has a Poisson's ratio of about 0.47 to about 0.499 and an effective hardness of about 55 Shore "A", or less.
A feature of this invention is an elastomeric covered rider roll where the elastomer has a Poisson's ratio of about 0.47 to about 0.499 and an effective hardness of about 65 Shore "A", or less.
These, and other objects, features and advantages of this invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art when the description of the preferred embodiments is read in conjunction with the attached drawings.
As shown in
In this description, where convenient, corresponding, or similar, components will be similarly designated with different suffixes used to distinguish between them.
The wound paper roll, although relatively hard, is not as hard as, for example, a solid steel winder drum. Thus, a representation of a wound paper roll 10 having a center shaft 23 supported on an ordinary steel winder support drum 18 could be as shown in
In the winder support drum of this invention, as shown in
The use of a relatively soft elastomer, which may be in the form of a foam, for example, would provide for an exceptionally wide nip area of contact NA (FIG. 3), but there would also be a concomitant large amount of cyclical radial movement of the cover as it deforms in the nip and is released upon the movement of the wound paper roll off the nip with the support drum. This produces mechanical working of the grooved, solid or foam elastomer, which will cause it to mildly warm-up. If mechanical working of the cover is extreme, it will heat up to a deleteriously high temperature, or, in the case of foam, to fracture and break down along the air voids within the cover, or both. Both of these conditions are very undesirable in a winder support drum since they contribute to the relatively quick destruction of the roll cover. Therefore, one of the important criteria in the selection of the elastomeric cover material is that it should not heat up excessively so as to deleteriously affect its structural composition during operation.
On the other hand, if the elastomeric cover is made quite hard, such as having an absolute hardness of about 85 Shore "A", or harder (i.e. a higher Shore number), then its operational characteristics are relatively similar to those of a steel drum. That is, the nip area NA is quite narrow, even approaching line contact, which provides neither a relatively large, nor soft, nip contact. Therefore, while a steel drum operates with some degree of satisfactory performance, at least to the extent that its operational life is long, it inherently operates with a relatively narrow nip having relatively high intensity which produces stress in the paper sheet being wound with attendant deficiencies in the wound paper roll, such as core bursts, tension bursts and air sheer bursts to name three.
The function of this invention is that the undesirable stress and relative movement between contiguous layers of the paper web will be reduced, particularly as the diameter of the wound paper roll grows larger, by softening the nip between the wound paper roll and the support drums. Such softening essentially can occur when the area of the nip is either larger than the area of the nip between the wound paper roll and a steel support drum, or when the area of the support nip becomes larger as the diameter, and weight, of the wound paper roll becomes larger.
In this invention, the nip area of contact between the wound paper roll and a support drum is made larger by providing an elastomeric roll cover which has a relatively high absolute hardness, but which has a relatively softer effective hardness so as to provide an appropriate reduction of deformation in its support nip with the wound web roll. Since elastomers, such as rubber compounds, are almost incompressible volumetrically, there must be deformation in order for the nip to become larger in area. This deformation and enlargement of the nip area of contact is produced by a unique combination of a relatively hard elastomer, having an absolute hardness of about 65 Shore "A", or less, for support drums (75 Shore "A", or less, for rider rolls); the elastomer having a Poisson's ratio of between about 0.47 and about 0.499; and a pattern in the surface of the elastomeric roll cover, which is open to the outer surface of the roll cover, which combine to provide a roll cover having an effective hardness much lower than that of the base material.
In this discussion, the term "absolute hardness" refers to the hardness of a pure, solid sample of an elastomeric compound, such as rubber. A winder support drum having a cylindrical cover made of the pure, solid elastomeric compound with no surface pattern in the cover, and being of a certain thickness and used to support a wound web roll of a given diameter and weight, would produce a nip NA of a certain width in the elastomeric cover.
The term "effective hardness" is the hardness of a winder support drum of the same size having a cover made of the same pure, solid elastomeric compound, but which has a pattern, open to the surface of the cover, and, when supporting the same wound paper roll having the same diameter and weight, produces a nip NA which is wider than the nip produced in the pure, solid elastomeric compound cover which does not have a surface pattern in it. The wider nip NA connotes a softer nip and, therefore, the "effective hardness" is less hard than the "absolute hardness".
Therefore, the pure, solid elastomeric compound, which has an absolute hardness of about 65 Shore "A", for example, for a winder drum (about 75 Shore "A", for example, for a rider roll) and having a Poisson's ratio of about 0.47 to 0.499, for example, might then have a relatively softer, effective hardness of about 55 Shore "A", for example, when the support drum cover was grooved with a series of grooves (an effective hardness of about 65 Shore "A" for a grooved rider roll cover), such as shown in
The preferred range of effective hardness for the elastomeric cover on a support drum is between about 30 Shore "A" and about 55 Shore "A".
The preferred range of effective hardness for the elastomeric cover on a rider roll is between about 40 Shore "A" and about 65 Shore "A".
Therefore, the shape of the surface pattern in the elastomeric cover of the support drum and rider roll is only important to the extent that its percent of volumetric void in a unit volume of the cover is such as to provide the desired effective hardness of the roll cover.
With regard to the term "nip", theoretically, if two absolutely hard, cylindrical support drums having infinitely small diameters are brought into nipping engagement, the nip approaches the shape of a straight line having no width. Of course, this is impossible in real machinery, so the nip is actually an area, such as shown in
Examples of some contemplated surface patterns are shown in
It should be noted that care must be given to the selection of the aspect ratio of the groove pattern. The aspect ratio is the groove depth divided by the land width between adjacent grooves. If the aspect ratio is too high, then the material between the grooves becomes elastically unstable. The land column between adjacent grooves behaves like a short column in a buckling mode. Thus, groove pattern design seeks to maximize the aspect ratio.
The same analysis could be made with regard to the grooves 36 between the land areas 37 in the roll cover shown in FIG. 6 and with the interstices 38 which are formed between the raised dimples 40 which form the outer peripheral surface of the roll cover shown in FIG. 8. In each of the roll covers shown in
The embodiment of a cover pattern shown in
In
For example, a typical groove, as shown in
Similarly, for example, a typical groove for a rider roll, as shown in
While an almost infinite variety of elastomers are known, many of which would provide acceptable results, it has been found that roll covers made of polyurethane and rubber compounds have provided a preferred demonstration of the principles and concepts disclosed. These compounds are recited by way of example only and are not intended to limit the disclosure and scope of the invention, which is defined solely by the claims.
Thus, an improved paper winder support drum and rider roll (here collectively referred to as rolls) have been disclosed which utilize an elastomeric cover having a relatively high hardness to provide an effectively relatively soft cover, and relatively soft, or wider, support nip with a paper roll being wound and supported by the support drum, and/or nipped with a rider roll, wherein the instant center of the paper web being wound is shifted to a location within the circumference of the support drum to achieve the stated objects and exhibit the stated features and advantages.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
8303748, | Dec 18 2000 | Tetra Laval Holding & Finance S.A. | Method for producing a packaging material |
8424582, | Dec 18 2000 | Tetra Laval Holdings & Finance S.A. | Method and device for producing a packaging material |
8555448, | Sep 27 2006 | Johns Manville | Roller for a rotary scrubber |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
1867550, | |||
2529286, | |||
2863175, | |||
2980356, | |||
3080014, | |||
3098619, | |||
3198696, | |||
3349693, | |||
3503567, | |||
3514829, | |||
3599306, | |||
3702687, | |||
3714693, | |||
3945723, | Sep 07 1973 | Xerox Corporation | Resilient roller |
4026487, | Dec 08 1975 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | Drum unwind system for sheet materials |
4149797, | Jun 03 1977 | Xerox Corporation | Sleeved organic rubber pressure rolls |
4193559, | Apr 07 1978 | E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company | Film web winding assembly |
4353296, | Mar 23 1981 | Beloit Technologies, Inc | Use of anisotropic rubber for venta-nip rolls |
4586224, | Aug 05 1983 | Uranit GmbH | Guide roller for paper and foil handling apparatus such as printing presses |
4880501, | Aug 19 1987 | J.M. Voith GmbH | Press cover for a press for dewatering web material |
4887340, | Oct 20 1987 | Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | Elastic fixing roller |
4934622, | Apr 11 1989 | Eastman Kodak Company | Core for winding a web of deformable material |
5071083, | Dec 26 1988 | Shin-Etsu Film Co., Ltd. | Touch roller for plastic polymer film manufacturing apparatus |
5240198, | Nov 29 1991 | GLV FINANCE HUNGARY KFT , ACTING THROUGH ITS LUXEMBOURG BRANCH | Compliant roller for a web winding machine |
5335871, | Mar 26 1992 | J M VOITH GMBH | Winder for rewinding a web, especially a paper web |
5431358, | Jul 26 1993 | DIVERSIFIED SYSTEMS, INC | Web roll support apparatus and method |
DE3302843, | |||
DE87172593, | |||
DE94200033, | |||
EP294546, | |||
EP521681, | |||
GB417769, | |||
JP2127337, | |||
JP5193792, | |||
JP60173542, | |||
JP6115771, | |||
JP6175463, | |||
JP62211679, | |||
JP6263248, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Sep 02 1998 | Beloit Technologies, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Apr 26 2001 | Beloit Technologies, Inc | GL&V Management Hungary KFT | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012729 | /0886 | |
Oct 24 2005 | GL&V Management Hungary KFT | GL&V MANAGEMENT HUNGARY KFT , ACTING THROUGH ITS LUXEMBOURG BRANCH | ALLOCATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY | 023273 | /0681 | |
Aug 02 2007 | GL&V MANAGEMENT HUNGARY KFT , ACTING THROUGH ITS LUXEMBOURG BRANCH | GLV FINANCE HUNGARY KFT , ACTING THROUGH ITS LUXEMBOURG BRANCH | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023419 | /0627 | |
Dec 15 2014 | GL&V USA INC | NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY INTEREST | 034687 | /0262 | |
Dec 15 2014 | GL&V LUXEMBOURG S A R L | NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY INTEREST | 034687 | /0262 | |
May 07 2019 | NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA | GL&V LUXEMBOURG S A R L | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 049455 | /0050 | |
May 07 2019 | NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA | GL&V USA INC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 049455 | /0050 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 10 2004 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 10 2008 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 17 2008 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 16 2005 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 16 2005 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 16 2006 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 16 2008 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 16 2009 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 16 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 16 2010 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 16 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 16 2013 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 16 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 16 2014 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 16 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |