The present invention relates to the optimum bio-storage temperature of biological materials. The temperature is between the melting point depression of the biological material and zero degrees C. The melting point depression temperature is determined by thermography, differential scanning calorimetry and cryomicroscopy.
|
1. A method for determining an optimum bio-storage temperature of a biological material, comprising the steps of:
selecting a biological material from the group consisting of food and non-food materials; and determining a melting point depression temperature of the biological material, wherein the optimum bio-storage temperature is greater than the melting point depression temperature and equal to or less than 0°C C.
6. A method for storing biological material, comprising the steps of:
selecting a biological material from the group consisting of food and non-food material; determining a melting point depression temperature of the biological material; and maintaining the biological material at an optimum bio-storage temperature, wherein said optimum bio-storage temperature is a temperature greater than the melting point depression temperature of said biological material and equal to or less than 0°C C.
2. A method according to
8. A method according to
10. A method according to
11. A method according to
13. A method according to
14. A method according to
15. A method according to
16. A method according to
18. A method according to
19. A method according to
0. 20. A method according to
storing the biological material in a refrigerated space, wherein the optimum bio-storage temperature is a temperature maintained in said refrigerated space that is as close to, but greater than, the melting point depression temperature as can be maintained by a temperature control system for said refrigerated space.
0. 21. A method according to
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This invention relates to methods of preservation of biological material for extended periods. Additionally, the invention relates to methods of determining the optimum temperature at which to store biological materials for extended periods.
It is known in the art that biological material can be stored at reduced temperatures to decrease the rate of deterioration of the biological material. The low temperature inhibits the activity of degradation enzymes in the biological material as well as inhibiting the growth of microorganisms which degrade the material. Currently available technologies can be divided into two categories. The first category includes storage of the material in an unfrozen state. Customarily, the biological material is stored at temperatures between 0°C C. and 10°C C. The second category of storage includes storage of the biological material in a frozen state. Customarily, the material is stored at a temperature of -15°C C. or less.
The existing technologies suffer from serious defects. Storage of biological material at temperatures between 0°C C. and 10°C C. extends the usable lifetime of the material. However, the extension is of a limited duration. Generally, biological material begins to undergo a noticeable amount of deterioration in one or two days and becomes completely unusable after two or more days. This places major constraints on the availability of fresh materials such as foodstuffs and other biological materials. The materials must be produced close enough to the location at which they will be sold so that an adequate usable life time remains after shipping.
Freezing of material overcomes some of the difficulties inherent in shipping fresh materials. Once frozen, the material may be stored for protracted periods and shipped over long distances. In the process of freezing, the formation of ice crystals within the material results in damage to the material, which reduces the quality of the material. The reduction in the quality of material stored in the frozen state results in a reduction in the value of the material relative to the fresh, unfrozen state.
Thus, there is a need in the art to provide a method for the extended storage of biological material with no loss of the usability or quality of the material. Such a method would find broad applicability, for example, in the handling of foodstuffs, cut flowers, cells, tissues, gametes, organs, and whole organisms. The present invention will be useful in the handling of all types of foodstuffs. The present invention is particularly useful for the storage of fresh produce, such as carrots, mushrooms, apples, onions, kiwis, citrus fruits, broccoli, tomatoes, and garlic. The present invention is equally useful for the storage of fresh caught seafood, such as shrimp, scallops, tuna, salmon, lobster, crab, oysters, and other fresh caught fish. The present invention is also useful for the storage of meat, such as chicken, beef, pork, lamb, and other types of meat. The invention is particularly suited for prepared cuts of meat, such as steaks, chicken breasts, hamburger, and fish fillets. The invention may also be used to store whole carcasses for shipping.
One object of the invention is to provide a methodology for determining the optimum bio-storage temperature of biological materials. This method includes the step of determining the melting point depression of the material to be stored.
An object of the invention is to provide a method of storage of biological materials comprising the steps of determining the melting point depression of the biological material and storing the biological material at a temperature greater than the melting point depression and less than 0°C C.
This invention relates to the optimum storage conditions for biological material. Storage at lower than ambient temperature results in a decrease in the rate of deterioration of biological materials. This decrease is caused by inhibition of degradation enzymes in the biological material, as well as a decrease in the growth rate of microbial contaminants. While it is possible to virtually completely halt the deterioration of biological material caused by degradation enzymes and microbes by freezing the material, such freezing results in a concomitant degradation of the material as a result of formation of ice within the cells of the material and subsequent rupture of the cells. The present invention provides a method for determining the optimum bio-storage temperature of a biological material, i.e., the lowest temperature at which the material may be kept without danger of freezing.
In order to determine the appropriate bio-storage temperature for biological material, a detailed analysis of the melting point of the material is required. This is accomplished by means of extremely accurate thermography or differential scanning calorimetry and visually confirmed by cryomicroscopy.
The melting point of pure water is 0°C C. Biological materials, by virtue of the presence of solute molecules such as ions, proteins, etc., generally will have a melting point that is lower than 0°C C. The difference between 0°C C. and the observed melting point is the melting point depression of the biological material. The optimum bio-storage temperature is the temperature as close to, but greater than, the melting point depression as is reliably attainable by current refrigeration technology. At present, this temperature is approximately 0.1°C C. greater than the melting point depression.
A 0.5 gram cylindrical tissue section is removed from the biological material. Type J thermocouples are inserted longitudinally into the center of the tissue section as shown in FIG. 3. The tissue sections are then placed inside Corning cryovials (3 Ml). The samples are then placed into an ultra-low temperature bath set at -30°C C., and the freezing exotherm is recorded. The thermocouples are connected to an eight-channel National Instruments Virtual Instrument (VI) configured for thermography. Initial signal processing and linearization are accomplished by an analog device's isolated linearized type J thermocouple input on a National Instruments back-plane. Three samples are run simultaneously from each biological material. After the samples equilibrate to -30°C C., the temperature in the bath is raised at 1°C C. per minute to 10°C C. The onset of melting temperature may be determined from the plot of temperature of the tissue sample versus time or, alternatively, from the data string by Fourier transformation or other known data analysis techniques. A representative example of the type of data obtained using this methodology is shown in FIG. 1.
One individual is weighed and placed into a sample container, and the container is sealed. The specimen is placed in the sample side of the differential scanning calorimeter. The sample is cooled at 20°C C. per minute to -30°C C., and then is warmed at 1°C C. per minute to 10°C C. The heat flow into the sample as a function of the temperature of the sample is measured. As the sample approaches the melting point, there is an increase in the heat flow required to raise the temperature a given amount. This increase is a result of the fact that energy is required to change the state of the material from the solid state (frozen) to the liquid state (melted). A representative thermogram is presented in FIG. 2. With currently available technology, this technique permits the determination of the melting point depression to within a few ten thousandths of a degree C.
A 0.2 mm thick (frozen) thin section of tissue is taken from the sample to be analyzed. The section is placed inside a quartz crucible and covered with a cover slip. The crucible is placed inside a Linkam BCS 196 Cryostage on an Olympus BH2 microscope. The state of the microscope is controlled by a Linkam TMS 92 controller, LNP2 pump and interfaced to a p5 90 MHz computer using Linkam link 2 software running under windows 3.1. The sample is examined visually for shifts in the crystal lattice for 80 minutes at and below the onset temperature determined by thermography. The magnification of the microscope is set to 200X. The samples is cooled to -30°C C. at a rate of 20°C C. per minute. If necessary, the microscope stage may be opened and freezing may be nucleated. The sample is held at -30°C C. for 5 minutes, and then is warmed at 10°C C. per minute to a temperature approximately 2°C C. below the onset temperature determined by thermography. The sample is then warmed at 1°C C. per minute to a temperature approximately 1°C C. below the onset temperature determined by thermography. The sample is then warmed at 0.1°C C. per minute to a temperature 0.1°C C. lower than the onset temperature determined by thermography. The sample is held at this temperature for 80 minutes. An ice crystal is identified by visual inspection and a micrometer is set to one edge of the crystal. The crystal is then checked at five-minute intervals to see of the edge of the crystal is receding. If there is no movement in the crystal edge, then the sample is warmed at a rate of 0.1°C C. per minute to a temperature equal to the onset temperature determined by thermography. The sample is once again held for 80 minutes with a micrometer set to the edge of an ice crystal and checked at five-minute intervals to see if the edge of the crystal is moving. If no movement is observed, then the sample is again warmed 0.1°C C. per minute to a temperature 0.1°C C. greater than the onset temperature, and the holding procedure repeated with visual inspection of the ice crystal at five-minute intervals. This procedure allows the visual confirmation of the melting point depression determined by thermography and/or differential scanning calorimetry.
Using thermography and cryomicroscopy, the melting point depression and, hence, the optimum bio-storage temperature has been determined for a number of types of biological material. The data is presented in Table 1.
| TABLE 1 | ||
| Currently Attainable | ||
| Bio-storage | ||
| Material | Melting Point | Temperature |
| Tiger Shrimp | -0.4 | -0.3 |
| Sea Scallop Meat | -3.4 | -3.3 |
| Chicken Breast | -1.2 | -1.1 |
| Carrot | -2.1 | -2.0 |
| Blue Fin Tuna | -3.3 | -3.2 |
| Atlantic Salmon | -4.2 | -4.1 |
| American Lobster | -5.2 | -5.1 |
| Dungeness Crab | -2.5 | -2.4 |
| Bay Scallops Meat | -4.4 | -4.3 |
| American Oyster Meat | -2.3 | -2.2 |
| Belon Oyster Meat | -3.9 | -3.8 |
| Wing Steak (Beef) | -1.8 | -1.7 |
| Mushroom (white) | -1.6 | -1.5 |
| Hamburger (extra lean) | -2.0 | -1.9 |
| Apple (Granny Smith) | -2.1 | -2.0 |
| Onion (white pearl) | -1.2 | -1.1 |
| Kiwi | -2.9 | -2.8 |
| Pork Chop | -1.8 | -1.7 |
| Lemon | -2.1 | -2.0 |
| Orange | -2.1 | -2.0 |
| Broccoli | -1.2 | -1.1 |
| Tomato (Roma) | -2.0 | -1.9 |
| Garlic | -2.0 | -1.9 |
As indicated in Table 1, it is currently envisioned that the optimum bio-storage temperature of biological materials is a temperature approximately 0.1°C C. higher than the melting point depression temperature. It is envisioned that, as temperature control technology provides greater accuracy and precision of temperature, the optimum bio-storage temperature will be closer to the melting point depression temperature. One skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the optimum bio-storage temperature may be closer to the melting point depression temperature than 0.1°C C. The limiting factor will be the ability of the temperature control technology to accurately and precisely produce a temperature that remains somewhat above the melting point depression temperature. Current technology permits a temperature of 0.1°C C. greater than the melting point depression temperature. As the technology improves, the optimum bio-storage temperature may decrease to 0.05°C C. or even 0.01°C C. greater than the melting point depression temperature.
Although the present invention is described in terms of preferred embodiments of biological materials, it is understood that the melting point depression can be determined for any biological material, and thus the optimum bio-storage temperature can be determined for any biological material. Accordingly, it is intended that the appended claims include all such materials and equivalents which come within the scope of the invention as claimed.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 3637405, | |||
| 3991218, | Nov 26 1974 | Food Research, Inc. | Process for treating fresh meats |
| 4387109, | Jan 28 1977 | Rich Products Corporation | Intermediate-moisture frozen oil-in-water emulsion foods |
| 4554410, | Nov 12 1982 | Hitachi, Ltd. | System for maintenance and diagnosis of mobile telephone equipment |
| 4565643, | Apr 24 1984 | Kanegafuchi Kagaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Antifreezing agent |
| 4587027, | Sep 16 1984 | United States Movidyn Corporation | Antifreeze for potable water |
| 4601842, | Jul 14 1981 | University Patents, Inc. | Prevention of freezing at moderate supercooling using biogenic ice nucleation inhibitors |
| 4772480, | Jun 06 1985 | Method of controllingly aging edible material | |
| 4832972, | Apr 06 1988 | CORNELL RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC , A CORP OF NY | Process for preservation of fish |
| 4895729, | Mar 31 1987 | University of British Columbia | Preservation of cut and segmented fresh fruit pieces |
| 5269149, | Apr 14 1992 | REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, THE A CA CORP | Method for long range transcontinental and transoceanic transport of fresh chilled meat |
| 5310427, | Aug 03 1990 | Japan Airlines Co., Ltd. | Method for transporting live fish |
| 5403609, | Apr 20 1990 | Gyula, Subotics | Method and equipment for storing foodstuffs, plants, vegetables, meats and other organic substances |
| JP63263440, | |||
| WO9516201, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Aug 30 2001 | Tolix Holdings Limited | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Sep 11 2006 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Oct 22 2005 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 22 2006 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 22 2006 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Oct 22 2008 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Oct 22 2009 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 22 2010 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 22 2010 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Oct 22 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Oct 22 2013 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 22 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 22 2014 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Oct 22 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |