A method for identifying a microorganism is described that includes abstracting gas or vapor associated with the microorganism from a detection region and flowing the same over an array of sensors of which an electrical property varies according to exposure to gases or vapors and observing the response of the sensors. An apparatus for detecting a microorganism is also disclosed having a detector means for detecting a gas or vapor associated with the microorganism which includes an array of sensors of which an electrical property varies according to exposure to the gases or vapors.
|
1. A method for identifying a microorganism, comprising abstracting gas or vapor associated with the microorganism from a detection region and flowing the same over an array of sensors of which an electrical property varies according to exposure to gases or vapors and observing the response of the sensors.
8. An apparatus for detecting a microorganism or the state of a microorganism, comprising:
a detector means for detecting a gas or vapor associated with the microorganism, said detector means comprising an array of sensors of which an electrical property varies according to exposure to the gases or vapors; and a library of responses to known microorganisms or known microorganism states.
0. 68. A method for identifying the state of a microorganism comprising:
abstracting gas or vapor associated with the microorganism from a detection region; flowing the same over an array of sensors of which an electrical property varies according to exposure to gases or vapors; observing the response of the sensors; and identifying the state of the microorganism based on the observed response.
0. 59. A method for identifying a microorganism comprising:
abstracting gas or vapor associated with the microorganism from a detection region; flowing the same over an array of sensors of which an electrical property varies according to exposure to gases or vapors and observing the response of the sensors; and comparing the response of the sensors against a library of responses to known microorganisms.
0. 77. A method for identifying a microorganism comprising:
abstracting gas or vapor associated with the microorganism from a detection region; flowing the same over an array of sensors of which an electrical property varies according to exposure to gases or vapors; observing the response of the sensors; and differentiating such gas or vapor from gas or vapor known to be associated with other known microorganisms.
0. 50. A method for identifying a microorganism comprising:
abstracting gas or vapor associated with the microorganism from a detection region; flowing the same over an array of sensors of which an electrical property varies according to exposure to gases or vapors and observing the response of the sensors; providing a library of responses to known microorganisms; and comparing the response of the sensors against the library of responses to known microorganisms.
0. 49. An apparatus for detecting a microorganism or the state of a microorganism, comprising:
a detector means for detecting a gas or vapor associated with the microorganism, said detector means comprising an array of sensors of which an electrical property varies according to exposure to the gases or vapors; a store for a library of responses to known microorganisms or known microorganism states; and comparison means operable automatically to compare a given response against the library.
2. The method according to
3. The method according to
4. The method according to
5. The method according to
6. The method according to claims 1 or 2, in which the detection region comprises an enclosed space above a Petri dish or other laboratory culture dish.
7. The method according to claims 1 or 2, in which the array of sensors is first purged using a purging gas.
9. The apparatus according to
10. The apparatus according to
11. The apparatus according to
12. The apparatus according to claims 8 or 9, comprising a probe for sampling a detection region by abstracting gas or vapor from said region to be passed to said detector means.
13. The apparatus according to
14. The apparatus according to
15. The apparatus according to
17. The method according to
18. The method according to
19. The method according to
20. The method according to
21. The method according to
22. The method according to any one of
24. The apparatus according to
25. The apparatus according to
26. The apparatus according to
27. The apparatus according to
28. The apparatus according to
29. The apparatus according to
30. The apparatus according to
32. The method according to
33. The method according to
34. The method according to
35. The method according to
36. The method according to
37. The method according to
39. The apparatus according to
40. The apparatus according to
41. The apparatus according to
42. The apparatus according to
43. The apparatus according to
44. The apparatus according to
45. The apparatus according to
46. The method according to
47. The method according to
48. The method according to
0. 51. The method according to
0. 52. The method according to
0. 53. The method according to
0. 54. The method according to
0. 55. The method according to
0. 56. The method according to
0. 57. The method according to
0. 58. The method according to
0. 60. The method according to
0. 61. The method according to
0. 62. The method according to
0. 63. The method according to
0. 64. The method according to
0. 65. The method according to
0. 66. The method according to
0. 67. The method according to
0. 69. The method according to
0. 70. The method according to
0. 71. The method according to
0. 72. The method according to
0. 73. The method according to
0. 74. The method according to
0. 75. The method according to
0. 76. The method according to
providing a library of responses to known microorganism states; and comparing the response of the sensors against the library of responses to known microorganism states.
0. 78. The method according to
providing a library of responses to known microorganisms; and comparing the response of the sensors against the library of responses to known microorganisms.
0. 79. The method according to
0. 80. The method according to
0. 81. The method according to
0. 82. The method according to
0. 83. The method according to
0. 84. The method according to
0. 85. The method according to
0. 86. The method according to
|
This invention relates to detecting bacteria.
Bacteria are identified in a variety of ways. Many have characteristic forms which can be seen under microscopic examination, but some are identified, when colonised on a growth medium, by a characteristic colour and in some cases this is confirmed by smell. Not all bacteria have any appreciable odour, but many have a characteristic associated gas or vapour due to their inherent metabolic activities.
Patent Abstracts of Japan, application number JP-A-60130398, discloses a detector for detecting the presence of microorganisms on the basis of evolved gases. WO 94/04705 discloses a method of detecting E. Coli by monitoring a gaseous product, this gaseous product being produced by cleavage of a glucuronide conjugate by β-glucuronidase produced by a certain bacterial species. GB-A-2176901 describes gas sensors based on the use of semi-conducting organic polymers, whilst U.S. Pat. No. 4,456,380 discloses an optical bacteria identification system using a plurality of optical filters.
The invention comprises a method for identifying bacteria comprising detecting gas or vapour associated with the metabolic activity of the bacteria and differentiating such gas or vapour from gas or vapour associated with other bacteria.
The method may comprise abstracting gas or vapour from a detection region and flowing the same over an array of sensors of which an electrical property varies according to exposure to gases or vapours and observing the response of the sensors.
The sensors may comprise semi-conducting polymers the resistance or impedance of which varies according to exposure to gases or vapours.
The response of the sensors may be compared against a library of responses to known bacteria, or the response may be input to a neural net trained against known bacteria.
The detection region may comprise an enclosed space above a Petri dish or like laboratory culture dish.
The array of sensors may first be purged using a purging gas.
The invention also comprises apparatus for detecting bacteria comprising detector means for detecting a gas or vapour associated with the bacteria.
Said detector means may comprise an array of sensors of which an electrical property varies according to exposure to gases or vapours. The sensors may comprise semi-conducting polymers the resistance or impedance of which varies according to exposure to gases or vapours.
The apparatus may comprise a store for a library of responses to known bacteria and comparison means operable automatically to compare a given response against the library. The apparatus may also comprise a neural net the input to which comprises the array of sensors and which is trained against known bacteria.
The apparatus may comprise a probe for sampling a detection region by abstracting gas or vapour from said region to be passed to said detector means. Said probe may comprise a cover for enclosing a Petri or like laboratory culture dish or an area of growth medium thereon.
Said probe may comprise a carrier gas feed and return and the apparatus may comprise a source of carrier gas.
Embodiments of apparatus and methods for detecting bacteria according to the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The drawings illustrate methods and apparatus for detecting bacteria comprising detecting gas or vapour associated with the bacteria, and, further, methods for identifying bacteria by differentiating such gas or vapour from gas or vapour associated with other bacteria.
The sensors 13 comprise semi-conducting polymers the resistance or impedance of which varies according to exposure to gases or vapours.
An array 12 of twenty sensors has been employed to distinguish the vapours associated with the bacteria Straphylococcus aureus, Eschericia coli and Group A beta-haemolytic streptococci.
Eight epidermiologically unrelated patient isolates of each species were recovered from frozen storage. Each bacteria isolate was cultured overnight in nutrient broth 40 in a glass Duran bottle 42 with a GL-45 screw cap. After overnight incubation at 37°C C. the cap was changed for a cap 44 with inlet and outlet ports. After a period of equilibration at 37°C C. the headspace vapour above the broth 40 was analysed by pumping same across the 20 sensor array 12 at a flow rate of ∼150 ml min-1.
The outputs of the sensors 13 were analysed by computing means 46 employing the non-linear cluster analysis mapping technique of Sammon (Sammon Jr., J. W., IEEE Trans. on computers, Vol. C-18, No. 5, May 1969, pp 401-409).
The probe 17 comprises a carrier gas feed 21 feeding a carrier gas such for example as purified air or nitrogen. Prior to taking gas or vapour from a sample in, say, a Petri dish, the array 12 of sensors 13 is first purged of any residual substances from a previous sensing operation by directing over the sensors 13 a stream of purging gas, which, in this instance, is the same as the carrier gas. The gas is supplied from a pressure bottle 22.
The sensors 13 can be selected for sensitivity to a broad spectrum of gases or vapours associated with bacteria and the apparatus may also be arranged to indicate concentration by measuring the level of response. A broader spectrum and a greater sensitivity will be obtained from a given array size by using a.c. technology as taught in EP-B-0 286 307 than by simply measuring d.c. resistance.
In addition to bacteria, the method may be applied to the detection of microfungi.
It may be important to specify the state of the microorganism when making an observation. Gases or vapours associated with growing bacteria or microfungi may well be different from gases or vapours associated with the same organism in growth-arrest stage or when it has been weakened or killed.
However, the library may contain data on the gases or vapours associated with microorganisms in all possible states, or the neural net trained to recognise them, so the apparatus may also identify the state as well as the microorganism.
Payne, Peter Alfred, Persaud, Krishna Chandra
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
7255677, | Mar 04 2002 | SMITHS DETECTION INC | Detection, diagnosis, and monitoring of a medical condition or disease with artificial olfactometry |
7819803, | Mar 04 2002 | Smiths Detection Inc. | Detection, diagnosis, and monitoring of a medical condition or disease with artificial olfactometry |
8233957, | Jan 25 2007 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | Sensor module for a catheter |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4246343, | Jan 24 1975 | University of Virginia and National Aeronautics & Space Administration | Microbial detection and enumeration method and apparatus |
4386157, | Oct 26 1981 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE ADINISTRATOR NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION | Method for detecting coliform organisms |
5051360, | May 06 1988 | Abo, Inc. | Method for detecting microorganism activity |
5094955, | Apr 13 1989 | Biomerieux, Inc | Device and method for detecting microorganisms |
5164796, | Mar 15 1988 | Biomerieux, Inc | Apparatus and method for detection of microorganisms |
EP264221, | |||
EP597584, | |||
EP124193, | |||
EP158497, | |||
EP286307, | |||
JP60130398, | |||
WO9013663, | |||
WO9404705, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Sep 15 2000 | Osmetech PLC | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Aug 31 2010 | Osmetech PLC | GENMARK DIAGNOSTICS, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 025026 | /0788 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 15 2006 | M2552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity. |
Apr 19 2010 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Sep 07 2010 | M2553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Yr, Small Entity. |
Sep 07 2010 | M2556: 11.5 yr surcharge- late pmt w/in 6 mo, Small Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jul 15 2006 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jan 15 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 15 2007 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jul 15 2009 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jul 15 2010 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jan 15 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 15 2011 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jul 15 2013 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jul 15 2014 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jan 15 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 15 2015 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jul 15 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |