A linear interpolation operator for determining the value y of a function of x when one knows the value y1 corresponding to x1, and a value y2 corresponding to x2 (where x2<x≧x1), comprises a first calculation circuit which determines the equation (xm+xM)/2; a second calculation which determines the equation (ym+yM)/2; a comparison circuit which compares x with (xm+xM)/2 so as to determine which one of the intervals [xm,(xm+xM)2], [(xm+xM)/2, xM] contains x and to feed back the limits of the selected interval into the first calculation circuit and the limits of the interval corresponding in y into the second calculation circuit.

Patent
   RE38427
Priority
Oct 27 1987
Filed
Nov 17 1994
Issued
Feb 10 2004
Expiry
Feb 10 2021
Assg.orig
Entity
unknown
0
4
EXPIRED
0. 6. A circuit for performing linear interpolation, given first and second x values and corresponding first and second y values, to generate a y value corresponding to an intermediate x value between the first and second x values, comprising:
first and second x-input registers, which initially contain the first and second x values;
first and second y-input registers, which initially contain the first and second y values;
a first circuit for calculating a midpoint between the values in the first and second x-input registers;
a second circuit for calculating a midpoint between the values in the first and second y-input registers;
a comparator circuit for comparing the intermediate x value with the calculated midpoint between the values in the first and second x-input registers;
a gating circuit for loading the calculated x and y midpoints into the first x-input register and the first y-input register, respectively, if the intermediate x value is greater than the calculated midpoint between the first and second x-input registers, and for loading the calculated x and y midpoints into the second x-input register and the second y-input register, respectively, if the intermediate x value is less than the calculated midpoint between the first and second x-input registers, in order to begin a following calculation cycle; and
output means, coupled to the second circuit for calculating a midpoint, for providing an output y value after a predetermined criteria has been satisfied.
1. A linear interpolation operator apparatus for determining a value of y, wherein y is a function of x, x is in a range between a known lower value x1 and a known higher value x2, and known values y1 and y2 correspond respectively to x1 and x2, comprising:
first calculation means for determining (xm+xM)/2, wherein the initial value of a lower range limit xm=x1 and the initial value of an upper range limit xM=x2;
said first calculation means comprising input registers, an adder and a divider by two;
second calculation means for determining (ym+yM)/2, wherein the initial value of a lower range limit ym=y1 and the initial value of an upper range limit yM=y2;
said second calculation means comprising input registers, an adder and a divider by two;
input means for inputting x;
comparing means for comparing x with (xm+xM)/2, said comparing means comprising a comparator including a first input terminal coupled to said divider by two of said first calculation means, a second input terminal coupled to said input means and an output;
feedback means responsive to the output of said comparator for transmitting the output of said divider by two of each of said first and second calculation means to a respective input register to reset corresponding upper or lower range limits, said feedback means comprising controlling gates for transmitting said output of said divider by two as a function of the comparator output; and
output means coupled to said divider by two of said second calculation means for providing the value y after a predetermined number of cycles.
2. A linear interpolation operator apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the same calculation means are repetitively cycled.
3. A linear interpolation operator apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said first and second calculation means, respectively, are pipe-line connected, the output of one calculation means being transmitted to the next calculation means.
4. A linear interpolation operator apparatus according to claims 1 to barycentric calculations, wherein the value y=(aA+bB)/(A+B) is to be calculated, wherein the values of the parameters are chosen as follows:
x1=0; x2=a+b; y1=A; y2=B and x=b.
5. A linear interpolation operator apparatus according to any of claims 1, 2 and 3 to the calculation of the product of two numbers A and B divided by a third number C (y=A*B/C), wherein the values of the parameters are chosen as follows:
x1=0; x2=C; y1=0; y2=B and x=A.
0. 7. The circuit of claim 6, wherein the predetermined criteria has been satisfied after a predetermined number of calculation cycles.
0. 8. The circuit of claim 6, wherein the calculated x and y midpoints are one-half way between the values in the registers for both the x-registers and the y-registers, respectively, and wherein each circuit for calculating a midpoint comprise a summing circuit followed by a divide-by-2 circuit. e####
9. The circuit of claim 8, wherein the divide-by-2 circuits each comprise a circuit for shifting a binary number by one bit position.
10. The circuit of claim 6, wherein the first circuit for calculating a midpoint comprises:
a first summer for summing the values contained in the first and second x-input registers; and
a divide-by-2 circuit connected to an output of the first summer for dividing such output by 2;
and wherein the second circuit for calculating a midpoint comprises:
a second summer for summing the values contained in the first and second y-input registers; and
a divide-by-2 circuit connected to an output to the second summer for dividing such output by 2.
11. The circuit of claim 6, wherein the predetermined criteria comprises a comparison between the values in the first and second y-input registers being less than a predetermined value.
12. The circuit of claim 6, wherein the predetermined criteria comprises a comparison between the intermediate x value and either of the values in the first and second x-input registers being less than a predetermined value.

As shown in FIG. 1, the flow chart of the process according to the instant invention starts with an initializing block 100 wherein the initial data x1, x2, y1, y2 and x are introduced. In block 101, the half sum (xm+xM)/2 of the minimum and maximum values of x, is calculated, in the present case, at first, (x1+x2/2; and at the same time (ym+yM)/2, initially (y1+y2)/2, is calculated.

In block 102, it is determined whether (xm+xM)/2 is higher than x. If the answer is NO, the block 103 is selected and it is considered that the new value of xm is (xm+xM)/2, that the value of xM remains unchanged, that the new value of ym is (ym+yM)/2 and that yM remains unchanged. If the answer is YES, the block 104 is selected where it is determined that xm remains unchanged, that the new value of xM is (xm+xM)/2, that ym remains unchanged and that the new value of yM is (ym+yM)/2.

In block 105, it is determined whether the difference between the new value of yM and the new value of ym is lower than a predetermined threshold ε. If the answer is NO, the block 101 is selected again and the cycle is repeated. If the answer is YES, a result y=(ym+yM)/2) is supplied to the block 106 and the calculation is completed at the end block 107.

The method corresponding to the flow chart of FIG. 1 is liable to be implemented by software means or by hardware means. FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate examplary implementations of the process according to the instant invention by hardware.

The algorithmic operator shown in FIG. 2 is directly derived from the flow chart of FIG. 1 In FIG. 2, four registers 201, 202, 203 and 204 are initially provided for and are designed so as to respectively receive the values xm, xM, ym, yM, that is, initially, the values x1, x2, y1, y2. Summation devices 205 and 206 respectively compute the sum of the values xm+xM and ym+yM. The summation results are divided by two in the respective dividers 207 and 208. A comparator 209 compares the output of the divider 207 with the value x for which the equivalent value y is expected. According to the result of the comparison, gates 210 and 211 transmit the output of the divider by two 207 towards the register 201 or 202, the content of the other register being unchanged and, at the same time, the gates 212 and 213 transmit the output of the divider by two 208 towards the register 203 or 204, while the other register stores the preceding unchanged value. In FIG. 2, the clock means designed for synchronizing the operation of the various registers are not shown, this process being well known by those skilled in the art. The means designed to ensure the end of cycle and the supply of the output signal y of the divider by two 208, at a given time, when the iteration has been processed during a sufficient number of cycles, are not shown either.

This end of cycle can be determined by the systematic choice of a predetermined number of cycles, by a comparison between the values yM and ym, or by a comparison between one and/or the other of the values xm and xM with respect to a value x.

It will be noted that the only calculations carried out by the operator shown in FIG. 2 are an addition and a division by 2, those operations being particularly simple in the binary system, and the duration of a number N of additions corresponds to the duration of one multiplication of N-bits numbers.

FIG. 3 shows an alternative embodiment of the instant invention wherein, instead of using N operating cycles of an operator such as the one shown in FIG. 2, a N-stages pipe-line operator is used. Data can then be successively introduced into the first stage according to the rate of a clock while the successive results are obtained at the N-th stage. Each stage comprises input registers 301 to 304 corresponding to the registers 201 to 204 of FIG. 2, adders 305 and 306 corresponding to adders 205 and 206, dividers by two 307 and 308 corresponding to dividers 207 and 208, and a comparator 309 corresponding to the comparator 209. The comparator 309 receives the value x from a fifth input register 310. This comparator supplies control signals to steering circuits 311 to 314, each of which supplies, according to the result of the comparison, either the output of the corresponding input register or the output of the divider 307 or 308, that is, the half sum of the contents of the input registers.

All the following stages (2 to N) are identical to the first one and the value y to be calculated is obtained at the output of the last stage.

As in the preceding case, this circuit is provided with clock means for its synchronization.

It will be noted that, instead of providing a pipeline operator with intermediate registers, it is possible to provide an asynchronous operator but, in this case, it would be compulsory to wait, each time, for the results of the calculations of the N stages before carrying out a new operation.

Of course, the operators illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3 are liable to numerous variations.

The invention is particularly advantageous with respect to the prior art systems when it is necessary to simultaneously interpolate several variables as a function of the variation of a same parameter. This is especially the case for tridimensional graphic applications wherein one tries to interpolate a dimension z at the same time as the dimension y and/or in the case of multicolor images, for example, for interpolating simultaneously the space coordinates y and z and three color parameters: R (red), Y (yellow) and B (blue). To achieve this purpose, one will add to the features of FIGS. 2 and 3, further to the y calculation block, a calculation block for each of the other parameters, controlled by the same comparator output signal (respectively 209 and 309).

On the other hand, as hereinabove mentioned, such operators permit, owing to an adequate selection of the input values, to carry out calculations other than linear interpolation calculations, for example barycentric calculations or quotients of two products. It is moreover apparent that, if it is possible to carry out the operation A*B/C, it is also possible to carry out the operations A/C, A/B and 1/C. It does not seem to be appreciably advantageous to use an operator according to the instant invention for carrying out such operations but it is a positive quality of this operator to offer a high flexibility and to permit to carry out various types of calculations.

For a barycenter calculation, that is, y=(aA+bB)(A+B), the following values will be chosen as input parameter values:

x1=0; x2=a+b; y1=A; y2=B and x=b.

Then, one effectively obtains by using the formula (1): y = &it; A + ( b - 0 ) &it; ( B - A ) / ( a + b - 0 ) = &it; ( &alpha; &it; &it; A + bA + bB - bA ) / ( a + b ) = &it; ( &alpha; &it; &it; A + bB ) / ( a + b )

For the calculation of a product composed of two numbers (A and B) followed by a division by a third number (C), the following values will be chosen as input parameter values:

x1=0; x2=C; y1=0; y2=B and x=A.

Then, one effectively obtains by using the formula (1): y = &it; 0 + ( A - 0 ) &it; ( B - 0 ) / ( C - 0 ) = &it; AB / C .

Meyer, Jacques

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
3789203,
3943343, Jul 09 1973 Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd. Program control system for manipulator
4001565, Jun 25 1974 Nippon Soken, Inc. Digital interpolator
RE30132, Jul 09 1973 Unimation, Inc. Program control system for manipulator
/
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Nov 17 1994STMicroelectronics S.A.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events


Date Maintenance Schedule
Feb 10 20074 years fee payment window open
Aug 10 20076 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 10 2008patent expiry (for year 4)
Feb 10 20102 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Feb 10 20118 years fee payment window open
Aug 10 20116 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 10 2012patent expiry (for year 8)
Feb 10 20142 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Feb 10 201512 years fee payment window open
Aug 10 20156 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 10 2016patent expiry (for year 12)
Feb 10 20182 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)