A fiber optic coupler comprising a plurality of single-mode optical fibers, each of which is tapered to form a small diameter section that extends in contiguous relationship with the small diameter sections of the other fibers to form a coupling region. Each of the fibers has a core surrounded by a cladding of refractive index lower than that of the core. At least one of the fibers has a refractive index pedestal of refractive index ni between said core and cladding, wherein n1>ni>n2, n1 and n2 being the refractive indices of the core and cladding, respectively.

Patent
   RE38586
Priority
May 05 1994
Filed
May 10 2001
Issued
Sep 14 2004
Expiry
May 05 2014
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
1
9
EXPIRED

The present invention relates to fiber optic couplers, and more particularly, to couplers that exhibit low values of nonadiabatic-taper-induced excess loss.

This invention relates to fiber optic couplers regardless of their function or physical configuration. The various kinds of coupler function to which the invention applies include achromatic, wavelength division multiplexing, signal tapping, switching and the like. Examples of various configurations are: (a) fused bi-conic taper couplers that are made by heating and stretching a plurality of coextending optical fibers to fuse and taper them, (b) overclad couplers that are made by inserting a plurality of optical fibers into a tube and heating the tube to collapse it onto the fibers and thereafter stretching the tube midregion, and (c) coextending fiber couplers that are made by heating and stretching a plurality of optical fibers to taper them, and thereafter placing the stretched regions of the fibers adjacent one another to form a coupling region where, optionally, portions of the claddings have been removed by etching, polishing or the like. In the various kinds of couplers the coupling region is surrounded by a medium having a refractive index n3 that is lower than the refractive index of the coupler fiber cladding. The medium can consist of air, glass, plastic or the like.

As the requirements for the optical performance of fiber optic couplers become ever more stringent, the need to eliminate excess loss sources becomes more critical. One such loss source, which can be the dominant loss source in some couplers, is nonadiabatic-taper-induced excess loss.

In the tapered regions of fiber optic couplers the fundamental mode is continuously changing shape to accommodate the changing local index profile. If the rate of change of geometry is too great, the fundamental mode can be coupled to the higher order modes of the coupler index structure. This mechanism is referred to as nonadiabatic mode coupling. While the coupler is called a "single-mode" coupler, that actually refers to the fact that the input and output fibers only support the low-loss propagation of the fundamental LP01 mode. The coupler can typically support several bound, propagating modes. However, some of these modes may cut off at some point during the taper, coupling their optical power into radiation modes which are lost as potential coupler output, resulting in excess loss. Other higher-order modes which do not cut off will output their power into higher order modes of the output fibers. These modes suffer high loss and, again, the next impact is power lost to the coupler output and increased excess loss. Typically these nonadiabatic mode coupling effects are wavelength dependent, and excess loss varies as a function of wavelength.

The following symbols are used herein to characterize features of the prior art and/or the present invention. The term Δ1-2 is defined as n12-n22)/2n12, where n1 and n2 are the refractive indices of the fiber core and cladding, respectively. The term βCR is used herein to mean the propagation constant of the fundamental mode in a coupler fiber in the coupling region of the coupler. The term Δpedestal equals

Discussed herein are the results of experiments involving type B couplers, each coupler being made from two identical high Δ1-2 low mode field diameter fibers. Couplers differed in the amount of chlorine contained in the inner portion of their cladding (at radii less than 10 μm).

The coupler fibers were made by the process disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,295,211 (which is incorporated herein by reference). A porous core preform comprising a core region and a thin layer of cladding glass is formed on a cylindrical mandrel. The mandrel is removed, and the resultant tubular preform is gradually inserted into a consolidation furnace muffle, the maximum temperature of which is between 1200°C and 1700°C C., preferably about 1490°C C. for high silica content glass. Chlorine, which is normally present during the preform consolidation step to achieve drying, may be supplied to the preform by flowing into the preform aperture a drying gas consisting of helium and chlorine. The end of the aperture is plugged to cause the gas to flow through the preform pores. A helium flushing gas is simultaneously flowed through the muffle.

The resultant tubular glass article is heated and stretched in a standard draw furnace while a vacuum is applied to the aperture to form a "core rod" in which the aperture has been closed. A suitable length of the rod is supported in a lathe where particles of silica are deposited thereon. The resultant final porous preform is inserted into a consolidation furnace where it is consolidated while a mixture of helium and chlorine is flowed upwardly through the furnace. The resultant glass preform is drawn to form a single-mode optical fiber. The amount of cladding glass particles applied to the initially formed core preform determines the radius of the chlorine pedestal or dip. The amount of chlorine to which the porous portion of the preform is subjected in the first and second drying/consolidation steps determines the value of Δpedestal. In the resultant fiber the radius of the germania-doped core was almost 2 μm, and the core-clad Δ1-2 was about 1.0%.

Couplers were formed in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,011,251 and 5,295,211. The protective coating is stripped from the midsection of one fiber and from the end of another fiber. The two fibers are inserted into the bore of a glass tube so that the stripped portions of the fibers extend through the tube midregion. The fiber bore is evacuated and the tube is heated to collapse the tube midregion onto the fibers. The tube is again heated and the central portion of the collapsed midregion is stretched to form a coupler.

In the resultant coupler, which is schematically illustrated in FIG. 6, optical fibers F1 and F2 extend within glass overclad tube 0. Those portions of the fibers extending from the tube preferably have protective coating material (not shown in this illustrative embodiment). At least those portions of the fibers within the tube midregion have no coating. The original diameter of the tube is d1. The central portion of the stretched midregion constitutes neckdown region N of diameter d2 where the fiber cores are sufficiently closely spaced for a sufficiently long distance z to effect the desired coupling therebetween. Region N is illustrated as having a constant diameter even though a slight taper exists therein, whereby the longitudinal center of section N exhibits the minimum diameter. Draw ratio R is equal to d1/d2. Tapered regions T connect the neckdown region with the unstretched end regions of tube 0.

An analysis of WDM couplers employing small mode field diameter fibers having different chlorine profile dips had shown that larger chlorine profile dips resulted in couplers having greater excess loss. To further confirm this mechanism. Type B WDM couplers were fabricated with four different small mode field fibers. Each coupler was formed from two identical small mode field diameter fibers that were made by the process described above. Each of the couplers employed fibers having different chlorine concentrations up to a radius of approximately 10 μm. Beyond a radius of approximately 10 μm the chlorine concentrations were essentially the same. At radii up to approximately 10 μm each type of fiber had a chlorine level less than the outer chlorine level (a dip) or a chlorine level greater than the outer chlorine level (a pedestal). Included were fibers with a large dip in the chlorine level (as in curve 20 of FIG. 5) and fibers with a pedestal like that shown in curve 22 of FIG. 5. In FIG. 7 the maximum excess loss over the wavelength range 1200 to 1600 nm is shown as a function of the amount of dip in the chlorine level at small radii (approximately 10 μm). Negative values of dip correspond to a pedestal. The data shows a clear trend to lower loss for smaller dips, and even better loss for pedestals. Therefore, a feature of this invention is to employ for use in fiber optic couplers optical fibers having a refracative index pedestal between the core and cladding. As shown in FIG. 8, the pedestal 27 has a maximum refractive index ni that is intermediate the maximum refractive index n1 of core 26 and refractive index n2 of cladding 28. For the sake of simplicity, core 26 and pedestal 27 are illustrated as being constant index regions of the fiber. Alternatively, core 26 and pedestal 27 could have a varying refractive index profile such as a gradient profile, a profile formed of a plurality of steps, or the like.

Numerical modeling was done to determine some aspects of an optimal design for this invention. The modeling tool that was used was as described U.S. Pat. No. 4,877,300, where the LP01 and LP11 propagation constant difference is calculated for a variety of geometries (variation in size along the taper).

FIG. 9 shows the theoretical variation of δβ at different values of Δpedestal, δβ representing the difference between the propagation constants of the lowest LP01 and the next highest LP11 modes and being equal to (βLP01LP11). Larger minimum values of δβ result in better excess loss performance. FIG. 9 shows that greater excess loss improvement can be achieved at larger values of Δpedestal. The curves of FIG. 9 correspond to the refractive index profiles (pedestals or dips) identified in Table 1.

TABLE 1
Curve Profile
36 0.16% Δped Pedestal
35 0.08% Δped Pedestal
34 0.04% Δped Pedestal
33 0.02% Δped Pedestal
32 Flat (no pedestal nor dip)
31 0.02% Δped Dip

An approximate relation between chlorine concentration differences and index Δ caused by those differences is Δ = Cl ⁢ ⁢ difference ⁢ ⁢ ( wt . ⁢ % ) 10

Further, the curves 31 to 33 approximately represent the span of chlorine differences experimentally measured, as shown in FIG. 7.

FIG. 10 shows the variation of δβ with pedestal radius for a Δpedestal value of 0.03%. The curves of FIG. 10 correspond to the pedestal radii identified in Table 2. A radius of 20 to 25 μm was optimum for greatest effectiveness. Similar values of pedestal radius were obtained for other values of Δpedestal.

TABLE 2
Curve Pedestal (Dip) Radius
41 10 μm
42 20 μm
43 30 μm
44 40 μm

The optimal values of Δpedestal and pedestal radius set forth above were derived without considering such factors as mode field diameter and cutoff wavelength. However, the presence of a pedestal in the refractive index profile of a fiber results in a different mode field diameter and cutoff wavelength than would be exhibited by the fiber in the absence of the pedestal.

These other fiber characteristics could be important in the designing of a type A fiber erbium amplifier WDM coupler, for example, the first coupler fiber of which is matched to a standard telecommunication fiber. Assume that a first end of the second coupler fiber is connected to the pump light source and must propagate light at a wavelength of 980 nm and that the second end of the second fiber is connected to the gain fiber. The second coupler fiber should be designed such that its cutoff wavelength does not fall below some specified wavelength, eg. 980 nm. Moreover, the mode field diameter of the relevant fiber should substantially match that of the gain fiber.

Therefore, in addition to considering the optimal parameters for loss, limitations due to cutoff wavelength and mode field diameter were also considered.

A summary of the limits derived with respect to mode field diameter limit (line 50) and cutoff wavelength limit (line 51) for the second coupler fiber is given in FIG. 11, where both of these limits are shown. The pedestal characteristics of the fiber must fall within the shaded area. The pedestal values available with chlorine doping are up to about 0.02% (line 52), corresponding to pedestal radii of around 10 μm. However, it is difficult to accurately produce values of Δpedestal lower than 0.01% with chlorine doping. The results on δβ values give competing trends here. Larger Δpedestal values are more effective, pushing the optimum result to the upper left part of the shaded region, but the previously derived optimum radius would indicate a value towards the right end of the region. In fact, the large Δpedestal, small radius end is somewhat better in performance from a loss perspective, as shown in FIG. 12.

While the relative improvement in excess loss from the variation seen here cannot be exactly quantified, the excess loss improvement seen in the above-described type B coupler experiment (FIG. 7) was the result of an increase in δβ of about 0.0004 μm-1, similar to the variation seen in FIG. 12.

Chlorine is a preferred dopant for Δped values less than 0.02% since chlorine is present during consolidation to dry the porous core preform. Its concentration is merely increased to a level greater than that employed during consolidation of the outer cladding in order to form a pedestal. However, other doping techniques must be employed to achieve Δped values greater than about 0.02%.

Dopants other than chlorine can be used to create fibers having pedestal 27 (FIG. 8) in their refractive index profile. The dopant that is employed to form core 26 can also be used to form the pedestal. Germania, which is commonly used as a dopant for optical fiber cores, could be used to form both core 26 and pedestal 27. Moreover, there are many other refractive index increasing dopants that could be used to form the core and/or pedestal. Pedestal 27 could also be formed of silica, cladding 28 being formed of silica doped with a refractive index decreasing dopant such as fluorine or boron.

Discussed herein have been couplers wherein less than all fibers have refractive index pedestals and couplers wherein fibers have identical refractive index pedestals. The invention also applies to couplers wherein more than one coupler fiber has a refractive index pedestal, not all pedestals being identical.

Weidman, David L., Young, Jr., Donald R.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
7991255, Dec 14 2007 Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH Means of coupling light into optical fibers and methods of manufacturing a coupler
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4763976, May 21 1987 Corning Glass Works Connector employing mode field modification
4795228, Dec 13 1985 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Fiber taper particularly useful for coupling a monomode fiber to a semiconductor laser
4877300, Oct 24 1988 Corning Incorporated Non-adiabatically-tapered connector
4976512, Apr 05 1989 Narrowband fiberoptic spectral filter formed from fibers having a refractive index with a W profile and a step profile
5179603, Mar 18 1991 Avanex Corporation Optical fiber amplifier and coupler
5268979, Jul 15 1992 Corning Incorporated Achromatic overclad fiber optic coupler
EP432421,
GB2035601,
JP60154215,
/
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
May 10 2001Corning Incorporated(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Nov 15 2006REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Apr 29 2007EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Sep 14 20074 years fee payment window open
Mar 14 20086 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 14 2008patent expiry (for year 4)
Sep 14 20102 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Sep 14 20118 years fee payment window open
Mar 14 20126 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 14 2012patent expiry (for year 8)
Sep 14 20142 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Sep 14 201512 years fee payment window open
Mar 14 20166 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 14 2016patent expiry (for year 12)
Sep 14 20182 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)