A fiber optic coupler comprising a plurality of single-mode optical fibers, each of which is tapered to form a small diameter section that extends in contiguous relationship with the small diameter sections of the other fibers to form a coupling region. Each of the fibers has a core surrounded by a cladding of refractive index lower than that of the core. At least one of the fibers has a refractive index pedestal of refractive index ni between said core and cladding, wherein n1>ni>n2, n1 and n2 being the refractive indices of the core and cladding, respectively.
|
|
The present invention relates to fiber optic couplers, and more particularly, to couplers that exhibit low values of nonadiabatic-taper-induced excess loss.
This invention relates to fiber optic couplers regardless of their function or physical configuration. The various kinds of coupler function to which the invention applies include achromatic, wavelength division multiplexing, signal tapping, switching and the like. Examples of various configurations are: (a) fused bi-conic taper couplers that are made by heating and stretching a plurality of coextending optical fibers to fuse and taper them, (b) overclad couplers that are made by inserting a plurality of optical fibers into a tube and heating the tube to collapse it onto the fibers and thereafter stretching the tube midregion, and (c) coextending fiber couplers that are made by heating and stretching a plurality of optical fibers to taper them, and thereafter placing the stretched regions of the fibers adjacent one another to form a coupling region where, optionally, portions of the claddings have been removed by etching, polishing or the like. In the various kinds of couplers the coupling region is surrounded by a medium having a refractive index n3 that is lower than the refractive index of the coupler fiber cladding. The medium can consist of air, glass, plastic or the like.
As the requirements for the optical performance of fiber optic couplers become ever more stringent, the need to eliminate excess loss sources becomes more critical. One such loss source, which can be the dominant loss source in some couplers, is nonadiabatic-taper-induced excess loss.
In the tapered regions of fiber optic couplers the fundamental mode is continuously changing shape to accommodate the changing local index profile. If the rate of change of geometry is too great, the fundamental mode can be coupled to the higher order modes of the coupler index structure. This mechanism is referred to as nonadiabatic mode coupling. While the coupler is called a "single-mode" coupler, that actually refers to the fact that the input and output fibers only support the low-loss propagation of the fundamental LP01 mode. The coupler can typically support several bound, propagating modes. However, some of these modes may cut off at some point during the taper, coupling their optical power into radiation modes which are lost as potential coupler output, resulting in excess loss. Other higher-order modes which do not cut off will output their power into higher order modes of the output fibers. These modes suffer high loss and, again, the next impact is power lost to the coupler output and increased excess loss. Typically these nonadiabatic mode coupling effects are wavelength dependent, and excess loss varies as a function of wavelength.
The following symbols are used herein to characterize features of the prior art and/or the present invention. The term Δ1-2 is defined as n12-n22)/2n12, where n1 and n2 are the refractive indices of the fiber core and cladding, respectively. The term βCR is used herein to mean the propagation constant of the fundamental mode in a coupler fiber in the coupling region of the coupler. The term Δpedestal equals
Discussed herein are the results of experiments involving type B couplers, each coupler being made from two identical high Δ1-2 low mode field diameter fibers. Couplers differed in the amount of chlorine contained in the inner portion of their cladding (at radii less than 10 μm).
The coupler fibers were made by the process disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,295,211 (which is incorporated herein by reference). A porous core preform comprising a core region and a thin layer of cladding glass is formed on a cylindrical mandrel. The mandrel is removed, and the resultant tubular preform is gradually inserted into a consolidation furnace muffle, the maximum temperature of which is between 1200°C and 1700°C C., preferably about 1490°C C. for high silica content glass. Chlorine, which is normally present during the preform consolidation step to achieve drying, may be supplied to the preform by flowing into the preform aperture a drying gas consisting of helium and chlorine. The end of the aperture is plugged to cause the gas to flow through the preform pores. A helium flushing gas is simultaneously flowed through the muffle.
The resultant tubular glass article is heated and stretched in a standard draw furnace while a vacuum is applied to the aperture to form a "core rod" in which the aperture has been closed. A suitable length of the rod is supported in a lathe where particles of silica are deposited thereon. The resultant final porous preform is inserted into a consolidation furnace where it is consolidated while a mixture of helium and chlorine is flowed upwardly through the furnace. The resultant glass preform is drawn to form a single-mode optical fiber. The amount of cladding glass particles applied to the initially formed core preform determines the radius of the chlorine pedestal or dip. The amount of chlorine to which the porous portion of the preform is subjected in the first and second drying/consolidation steps determines the value of Δpedestal. In the resultant fiber the radius of the germania-doped core was almost 2 μm, and the core-clad Δ1-2 was about 1.0%.
Couplers were formed in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,011,251 and 5,295,211. The protective coating is stripped from the midsection of one fiber and from the end of another fiber. The two fibers are inserted into the bore of a glass tube so that the stripped portions of the fibers extend through the tube midregion. The fiber bore is evacuated and the tube is heated to collapse the tube midregion onto the fibers. The tube is again heated and the central portion of the collapsed midregion is stretched to form a coupler.
In the resultant coupler, which is schematically illustrated in
An analysis of WDM couplers employing small mode field diameter fibers having different chlorine profile dips had shown that larger chlorine profile dips resulted in couplers having greater excess loss. To further confirm this mechanism. Type B WDM couplers were fabricated with four different small mode field fibers. Each coupler was formed from two identical small mode field diameter fibers that were made by the process described above. Each of the couplers employed fibers having different chlorine concentrations up to a radius of approximately 10 μm. Beyond a radius of approximately 10 μm the chlorine concentrations were essentially the same. At radii up to approximately 10 μm each type of fiber had a chlorine level less than the outer chlorine level (a dip) or a chlorine level greater than the outer chlorine level (a pedestal). Included were fibers with a large dip in the chlorine level (as in curve 20 of
Numerical modeling was done to determine some aspects of an optimal design for this invention. The modeling tool that was used was as described U.S. Pat. No. 4,877,300, where the LP01 and LP11 propagation constant difference is calculated for a variety of geometries (variation in size along the taper).
TABLE 1 | |
Curve | Profile |
36 | 0.16% Δped Pedestal |
35 | 0.08% Δped Pedestal |
34 | 0.04% Δped Pedestal |
33 | 0.02% Δped Pedestal |
32 | Flat (no pedestal nor dip) |
31 | 0.02% Δped Dip |
An approximate relation between chlorine concentration differences and index Δ caused by those differences is
Further, the curves 31 to 33 approximately represent the span of chlorine differences experimentally measured, as shown in FIG. 7.
TABLE 2 | ||
Curve | Pedestal (Dip) Radius | |
41 | 10 μm | |
42 | 20 μm | |
43 | 30 μm | |
44 | 40 μm | |
The optimal values of Δpedestal and pedestal radius set forth above were derived without considering such factors as mode field diameter and cutoff wavelength. However, the presence of a pedestal in the refractive index profile of a fiber results in a different mode field diameter and cutoff wavelength than would be exhibited by the fiber in the absence of the pedestal.
These other fiber characteristics could be important in the designing of a type A fiber erbium amplifier WDM coupler, for example, the first coupler fiber of which is matched to a standard telecommunication fiber. Assume that a first end of the second coupler fiber is connected to the pump light source and must propagate light at a wavelength of 980 nm and that the second end of the second fiber is connected to the gain fiber. The second coupler fiber should be designed such that its cutoff wavelength does not fall below some specified wavelength, eg. 980 nm. Moreover, the mode field diameter of the relevant fiber should substantially match that of the gain fiber.
Therefore, in addition to considering the optimal parameters for loss, limitations due to cutoff wavelength and mode field diameter were also considered.
A summary of the limits derived with respect to mode field diameter limit (line 50) and cutoff wavelength limit (line 51) for the second coupler fiber is given in
While the relative improvement in excess loss from the variation seen here cannot be exactly quantified, the excess loss improvement seen in the above-described type B coupler experiment (
Chlorine is a preferred dopant for Δped values less than 0.02% since chlorine is present during consolidation to dry the porous core preform. Its concentration is merely increased to a level greater than that employed during consolidation of the outer cladding in order to form a pedestal. However, other doping techniques must be employed to achieve Δped values greater than about 0.02%.
Dopants other than chlorine can be used to create fibers having pedestal 27 (
Discussed herein have been couplers wherein less than all fibers have refractive index pedestals and couplers wherein fibers have identical refractive index pedestals. The invention also applies to couplers wherein more than one coupler fiber has a refractive index pedestal, not all pedestals being identical.
Weidman, David L., Young, Jr., Donald R.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
7991255, | Dec 14 2007 | Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH | Means of coupling light into optical fibers and methods of manufacturing a coupler |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4763976, | May 21 1987 | Corning Glass Works | Connector employing mode field modification |
4795228, | Dec 13 1985 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Fiber taper particularly useful for coupling a monomode fiber to a semiconductor laser |
4877300, | Oct 24 1988 | Corning Incorporated | Non-adiabatically-tapered connector |
4976512, | Apr 05 1989 | Narrowband fiberoptic spectral filter formed from fibers having a refractive index with a W profile and a step profile | |
5179603, | Mar 18 1991 | Avanex Corporation | Optical fiber amplifier and coupler |
5268979, | Jul 15 1992 | Corning Incorporated | Achromatic overclad fiber optic coupler |
EP432421, | |||
GB2035601, | |||
JP60154215, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 10 2001 | Corning Incorporated | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Nov 15 2006 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Apr 29 2007 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 14 2007 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 14 2008 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 14 2008 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 14 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 14 2011 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 14 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 14 2012 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 14 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 14 2015 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 14 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 14 2016 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 14 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |