The polymerizable dental isolation barrier has a monomer and an initiator. The barrier composition has at least one additive including a polymer strength reducer, a wet tissue adherence accentuator, and a reflective material The polymer strength reducer is an organic compound that prevents complete polymerization. The tissue adherence accentuator enables the barrier to adhere to a dental substrate ever after polymerization. The reflective material lowers the reaction rate and lowers the production of excess heat to reduce patient discomfort and to avoid tissue damage.
|
50. A method of making a polymerizable isolation barrier for isolating a dental substrate to confine a dental treatment composition to an area defined by the isolation barrier, the polymerizable isolation barrier method comprising mixing together at least one monomer, at least one curing agent for curing the at least one monomer, and at least one tissue adherence accentuator different than the at least one monomer.
1. A polymerizable isolation barrier for isolating a dental substrate to confine a dental treatment composition to an area defined by the isolation barrier, the polymerizable isolation barrier comprising the mixture products of:
at least one monomer;
at least one curing agent for curing the at least one monomer; and
at least one tissue adherence accentuator different than the at least one monomer.
0. 51. A polymerizable isolation barrier for isolating a dental substrate to confine a dental treatment composition to an area defined by the isolation barrier, the polymerizable isolation barrier comprising:
at least one polymerizable material;
at least one curing agent for curing the at least one polymerizable material; and
at least one tissue adherence accentuator different than the at least one polymerizable material.
0. 82. A polymerizable isolation barrier for isolating a dental substrate to confine a dental treatment composition to an area defined by the isolation barrier, the polymerizable isolation barrier comprising:
at least one polymerizable material comprising at least one of urethane dimethacrylate or a derivative of urethane dimethacrylate;
at least one curing agent for the at least one polymerizable material; and
at least one tissue adherence accentuator different than the at least one polymerizable material.
34. A polymerizable isolation barrier for isolating a dental substrate to confine a dental treatment composition to an area defined by the isolation barrier, the polymerizable isolation barrier comprising the mixture products of:
at least one monomer;
at least one curing agent for curing the at least one monomer; and
at least one tissue adherence accentuator, different than the at least one monomer, selected from the group consisting of a gum, a cellulose material, a high molecular weight polyol and a polymer.
0. 85. A method of making a polymerizable isolation barrier used in isolating a dental substrate to confine a dental treatment composition to an area defined by the isolation barrier, the method comprising:
mixing together at least one monomer, at least one curing agent for curing the at least one monomer, and at least one tissue adherence accentuator; and
partially polymerizing at least a portion of the at least one monomer to yield a polymerizable isolation barrier comprising at least one partially polymerized monomer.
44. A polymerizable isolation barrier for isolating a dental substrate to confine a dental treatment composition to an area defined by the isolation barrier, the polymerizable isolation barrier comprising the mixture products of:
at least one monomer;
at least one curing agent for curing the at least one monomer; and
at least one tissue adherence accentuator, different than the at least one monomer, selected from the group consisting of xanthan gum, guar gum, tragacanth gum, ethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, polyethylene glycol with a molecular weight of at least about 600, polypropylene glycol with a molecular weight of at least about 600, polysiloxanes, carboxy poly methylene and water-soluble polyethylene oxides.
0. 91. A method of isolating hard dental tissue and to contain a dental treatment composition to a defined area comprising:
providing a polymerizable isolation barrier composition including at least one polymerizable material, at least one curing agent for curing the at least one polymerizable material, and at least one tissue adherence accentuator;
delivering the polymerizable isolation barrier composition onto an oral tissue surface to isolate hard dental tissue;
treating the polymerizable isolation barrier composition with light radiant energy to polymerize at least a portion of the at least one polymerizable material;
applying a dental treatment composition to the defined area; and
removing the isolation barrier from the dental substrate.
2. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
3. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
4. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
5. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
6. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
7. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
8. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
9. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
10. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
11. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
12. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
13. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
14. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
15. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
16. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
17. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
18. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
19. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
20. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
21. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
22. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
23. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
24. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
25. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
26. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
27. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
28. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
29. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
30. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
31. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
32. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
33. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
35. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
36. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
37. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
38. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
39. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
40. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
41. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
42. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
43. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
45. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
46. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
47. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
48. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
49. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 52. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 53. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 54. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 55. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 56. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 57. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 58. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 59. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 60. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 61. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 62. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 63. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 64. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 65. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 66. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 67. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 68. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 69. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 70. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 71. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 72. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 73. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 74. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 75. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 76. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 77. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 78. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 79. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 80. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 81. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 83. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 84. A polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 86. A method of making a polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 87. A method of making a polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 88. A method of making a polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 89. A method of making a polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 90. A method of making a polymerizable isolation barrier according to
0. 92. A method according to
0. 93. A method according to
|
The present application is a divisional of Ser. No. 08/802,674, filed on Feb. 19, 1997 for POLYMERIZABLE ISOLATION BARRIERS AND METHODS FOR FORMING AND USING SUCH BARRIERS, by the following inventors: Steven D. Jensen and Dan E. Fischeralkylaminometliacrylates alkylaminomethacrylates and derivatives thereof. The alkylmethacrylates include triethylene glycol dimethacrylate, polyethylene glycol (PEG) dimethacrylate (all molecular weights), butane di-ol dimethacrylate, and equivalents. The alkylhydroxymethacrylates include 2-hydroxy ethyl methacrylate, glycerol dimethacrylate, bis-GMA, and equivalents. The alkylaminomethacrylates include urethane dimethacrylate and equivalents. The monomers of the present invention are provided in a concentration range from about 50 to about 99 percent, preferably from about 60 to about 95 percent, and most preferably from about 70 to about 90 percent by weight of the composition. The preferred methacrylates include alkylmethacrylates. The more preferred methacrylale methacrylate is triethylene glycol dimethacrylate. In addition to the above methacrylates, other monomers are within the contemplation of the present invention and can be found by routine experimentation by reading the disclosure and practicing the invention.
B. Curing Agents
Curing agents were found to be useful, and depending upon the specific dental procedure, were preferred with or without certain organic amine additives.
A curing agent is provided to induce the monomer to cross link upon exposure to adequate light radiant energy. The curing agent is preferably of substantially low toxicity to humans. Curing agents may also be selected to be complementary to other ingredients for a selected dental procedure. Curing agents include photoinitiators and amine additives as needed.
Examples of photoinitiators include camphorquinone; benzoin methyl ether; 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-1-phenyl-1-propanone; diphenyl 2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl phosphine oxide; benzoin ethyl ether; benzophenone; 9,10-anthraquinone, and equivalents.
Optional additives such as amine additives are preferred in formulating curing agents to assist the curing agents depending upon the specific application of the polymerinzble isolation barrier. Examples of amine additives include dimethyl amino ethyl methacrylate; tri ethyl amine; 2-dimethylamino ethanol; diethyl amino ethyl methacrylate; trihexyl amine: N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine; N-methylethanolamines and equivalents.
The curing agents of the present invention are provided in a concentration range from about 0.01 to about 2 percent, preferably from about 0.1 to about 1 percent, more preferably from about 0.2 to about 0.8 percent, and most preferably about 0.3 percent by weight of the composition. The preferred curing agent includes 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-1-phenyl-1-propanone and diphenyl 2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl phosphine oxide. In addition to the above curing agents, other curing agents are within the contemplation of the present invention and can be found by routine experimentation by reading the disclosure and practicing the invention.
C. Polymerization Strength Reducers
During polymerization, there are several variables to consider. Heat is usually generated during polymerization due to the exothermic nature of polymerization. A significant increase in temperature during polymerization can cause discomfort to the patient or can be sufficient to also cause burning.
An organic compound is preferred that has the capability to substantially decrease or minimize the degree of polymerization of the isolation barrier material compared to a barrier material without such an organic compound. Thus, the total exothermic heat potential for a given amount of monomer will be reduced during polymerization.
In addition to preventing unwanted excess heat of reaction, it was found that certain organic compounds cause the isolation barrier material to become weakened. A weakened isolation barrier has the advantage of easy removal after completion of the dental procedure. The clinician can take hold of the polymerized isolation barrier by hand or with an instrument like tweezers and remove it in discrete segments or as integral unit. The size of the discrete segments is generally about one-half the area that the isolation barrier is isolating. For example, when the whole arch is being isolated, it is preferable that the discrete segments are at least about one-fourth the length of the arch, more preferable at least about one-half the length of the arch, and most preferably the isolation barrier will be removed as an integral unit. The advantage is that, where a hydrophobic isolation barrier is required for a given dental procedure, removal after the procedure takes only one or a few removal steps and any small portions that may crumble are easily rinsed away after being dislodged.
Examples of suitable polymerization strength reducers include oils such as mineral oils. Other suitable examples include alcohols such as cetyl alcohol, steryl alcohol, derivatives thereof, and equivalents. Yet other suitable examples include polyols such as polyethylene glycols, polypropylene glycols, propylene glycol, derivatives thereof, and equivalents. The polymerization strength reducers of the present invention are provided in a concentration range, when included, from about 1 to about 30 percent, preferably from about 5 to about 20 percent, more preferably from about 10 to about 15 percent, and most preferably about 12 percent by weight of the composition. Of the polymerization strength reducers, the preferred includes cetyl alcohol.
D. Tissue Adherence Accentuators
During polymerization of the isolation barrier and during treatment, it is desirable that the isolation barrier adhere between an interior surface of the inventive isolation barrier and wetted tissue. As a feature of the present invention, it was found that when an adherence accentuator is added, the isolation barrier material will adhere better to tissue before, during, and after polymerization. An inner surface of the isolation barrier is one that interfaces with the dental substrate.
When the isolation barrier is utilized as part of a dental procedure involving teeth bleaching with a peroxide composition that would harm tissue, it is preferable to apply the isolation barrier composition and begin to polymerize with a dental light. After the barrier is positioned and polymerized, the dental light is used to activate the peroxide bleaching composition which also may cause continued polymerization of the isolation barrier. With preferred tissue adherence accentuators, the isolation barrier composition continues to gently adhere to wetted tissue even when the monomer becomes substantially polymerized. An advantage of this feature of the invention is that a substantially conformal isolation barrier can be laid up against the tooth to isolate it and it will adhere adequately to tissues during a time period for standard isolation treatment procedures.
Examples of tissue adherence accentuators include gums such as xanthan gum, guar gum, tragacanth gum, their derivatives, and equivalents. Other examples include cellulose materials such as ethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, their derivatives, and equivalents. Yet other examples include polymers such as carboxy poly methylene, polysiloxanes, water-soluble polyethylene oxide polymers, derivatives and equivalents. The water-soluble polyethylene oxides preferably have molecular weights of around 100,000 or more even up to several million. The preferred water-soluble polyethylene oxide polymer is sold as Polyox® by Union Carbide. Additionally, high molecular weight polyols can function as tissue adherence accentuators such as polypropylene glycols and polyethylene glycols having a molecular weight of at least 600. The tissue adherence accentuators of the present invention, when used, are supplied to the inventive composition in a concentration range from about 0.01% to about 9%, preferably from about 0.03% to about 5%, more preferably from about 0.05% to about 3%, and most preferably about 0.1% by weight of the composition. The preferred tissue adherence accentuator is xanthan gum.
E. Reflective Materials.
Another method of lowering harmful amounts of excess heat released during polymerization is to reflect some of the light radiant energy of the dental light away from the isolation barrier composition. Dental curing lights and laser treatment lights typically come with only intense light radiation settings, which is desirable in certain applications such as peroxide teeth bleaching. It was found that the addition of reflective materials causes a portion of the dental light to be reflected thereby reducing heating of the isolation barrier during polymerization, particularly when polymerized with a light at an intense light radiation setting, and during a subsequent dental procedure such as bleaching. Thus, the composition absorbs less light radiant energy, the isolation barrier is less energized than would be otherwise, the underlying gum tissue is not subjected to undue heating during a dental procedure that uses a curing or laser light and light is even reflected away from the underlying gums or other protected tissue.
Examples of reflective materials include metals such as gold flake, aluminum flake, titanium flake, and equivalents. Other examples include metal oxides such as aluminum oxide, titanium dioxide, precipitated silica, ceria, thoria and equivalents. Yet other examples include micas and equivalents. The reflective materials of the present invention, when included, are provided in a concentration range from about 1 to about 50 percent, preferably from about 2 to about 30 percent, more preferably from about 3 to about 20 percent, and most preferably about 15 percent. The preferred reflective material comprises micas.
F. General Properties.
It is advantageous to combine various aspects of the present invention for preferred applications. For example, a peroxide gel may be the treatment composition and light radiant energy will be used both during polymerization of the compositions of the present invention and later during peroxide bleaching material. In such a case, the clinician may select a composition that includes polymerization strength reducers, tissue adherence accentuators, and reflecting materials. Thus, such a composition will achieve a weakened isolation barrier for easy removal and for resistance to incidental touching during the dental procedure, it will assure that the isolation barrier sufficiently remains in place to adequately seal off the soft tissue while the bleachant is on the tooth, and reflects intense light energy during a treatment procedure to protect the underlying gums from undue heating.
Alternatively, an application might be required where the tooth is to be isolated for dryness purposes. In such a case, the clinician may select a composition that includes polymerization strength reducers and tissue adherence accentuators. Thus, such a composition will achieve a weakened isolation barrier for easy removal yet adequate resistance to incidental touching during the dental procedure, and the composition will remain sufficiently in place against tissue during the procedure.
The method of making the polymerizable isolation barrier is carried out by providing at least one monomer; providing at least one curing agent for curing the at least one monomer; and by providing at least one of three preferred additives that include the organic polymerization strength reducer, the tissue adherence accentuator, or the reflective material. The ingredients are blended in a container until homogeneous, and the homogenous mixture is placed in a container that is resistant to light energy. The inventive polymerizable isolation barrier material is preferably stored at or below room temperature. The inventive polymerizable isolation barrier material is stable enough to be stored under normal conditions at the operatory until activated by suitable light radiant energy.
G. Methods of Use.
The inventive polymerizable isolation barrier material is made in a paste or gel form that is rheologically able to be expressed from a dental syringe. The components of the isolation barrier material form either an emulsion or a solution depending upon selection of a preferred application. The inventive polymerizable isolation barrier material is also preferably made in a roll or tape form of a curable putty that is rolled onto the gums, pressed into place, for example with finger pressure, carved to isolate hard tissue, and then cured with light radiant energy. The components of this isolation barrier material form either an emulsion, dispersion, suspension, solution, etc. depending upon selection of a preferred application.
The inventive polymerizable isolation barrier material is applied by any of several methods.
Removal of isolation barrier 28 after the dental treatment is accomplished as illustrated in
Several examples of the present invention are presented as merely illustrative of some embodiments of the present invention. These examples are not to be construed as limiting the spirit and scope of the invention. The following nine hypothetical examples were produced in furtherance of reducing the present invention to practice. All amounts are given in weight percent.
Percent by Weight
Component
of the Mixture
mica
2.0
xanthan gum
0.1
curing agents
0.3
cetyl alcohol
12.5
precipitated silica
13.0
triethylene glycol dimethacrylate
72.1
The foregoing example produces an isolation barrier material composition that, upon application to the dental substrate and polymerization, is sufficiently weakened to facilitate its removal in discrete, tooth-sized segments or larger with a tweezers-like instrument from the dental substrate after use in a dental procedure. The barrier material also is resistant to deformation at the external surface of the barrier due to incidental touching but remains adherent to the dental substrate at the internal surface of the barrier. The barrier material also is configured to decrease the polymerization reaction rate and to reflect excessive light radiant energy to thereby resist thermal tissue damage due to substantial heat production during polymerization.
Percent by Weight
Component
of the Mixture
mica
3.0
xanthan gum
0.3
curing agents
0.5
PEG dimethacrylate (300)
96.2
The foregoing example produces an isolation barrier material composition that, upon application to the dental substrate and polymerization, is resistant to deformation at the external surface of the barrier due to incidental touching but remains adherent to the dental substrate at the internal surface of the barrier. The barrier material also reflects excessive light radiant energy in order to resist thermal tissue damage due to substantial heat production during polymerization.
Percent by Weight
Component
of the Mixture
titanium dioxide
1.0
guar gum
0.1
steryl alcohol
17.0
precipitated silica
12.0
2-hydroxy ethyl methacrylate
69.0
curing agents
0.9
The foregoing example produces an isolation barrier material composition that, upon application to the dental substrate and polymerization, is sufficiently weakened to facilitate its removal in discrete, tooth-sized segments or larger with a tweezers-like instrument from the dental substrate after use in a dental procedure The barrier material also is resistant lo deformation at the external surface of the barrier due to incidental touching but remains adherent to the dental substrate at the internal surface of the barrier. The barrier material also is configured to decrease the polymerization reaction rate and reflect excessive light radiant energy to thereby resist thermal tissue damage due to substantial heat production during polymerization.
Percent by Weight
Component
of the Mixture
xanthan gum
1.0
PEG dimethacrylate (600)
98.5
curing agents
0.5
The foregoing example produces an isolation barrier material composition that, upon application to the dental substrate and polymerization, is resistant to deformation at the external surface of the barrier due to incidental touching but remains adherent to the dental substrate at the internal surface of the barrier.
Percent by Weight
Component
of the Mixture
cetyl alcohol
20.0
tri ethylene glycol dimethacrylate
79.0
curing agents
1.0
The foregoing example produces an isolation barrier material composition that, upon application to the dental substrate and polymerization, is sufficiently weakened to facilitate its removal in discrete, tooth-sized segments or larger with a tweezers-like instrument from the dental substrate after use in a dental procedure.
Percent by Weight
Component
of the Mixture
titanium dioxide
1.0
mica
5.0
urethane dimethacrylate
93.8
curing agents
0.2
The foregoing example produces an isolation barrier material composition that, upon application to the dental substrate and polymerization, reflects excessive light radiant energy in order to resist thermal tissue damage due to substantial heat production during polymerization.
Percent by Weight
Component
of the Mixture
xanthan gum
0.2
cetyl alcohol
12.0
curing agents
0.5
tri ethylene glycol dimethacrylate
87.3
The foregoing example produces an isolation barrier material composition that, upon application to the dental substrate and polymerization, is sufficiently weakened to facilitate its removal in discrete, tooth-sized segments or larger with a tweezers-like instrument from the dental substrate after use in a dental procedure. The barrier material also is resistant to deformation at the external surface of the barrier due to incidental touching but remains adherent to the dental substrate at the internal surface of the barrier. The barrier material is also configured to decrease the polymerization reaction rate and thereby resist thermal tissue damage due to substantial heat production during polymerization.
Percent by Weight
Component
of the Mixture
aluminum oxide
1.0
xanthan gum
2.0
curing agents
0.5
glycerol dimethacrylate
96.5
The foregoing example produces an isolation barrier material composition that, upon application to the dental substrate and polymerization, remains adherent to the dental substrate at the internal surface of the barrier. The barrier material also is configured to decrease the polymerization reaction rate and thereby resist thermal tissue damage due to substantial heat production during polymerization.
Percent by Weight
Component
of the Mixture
cetyl alcohol
12.0
aluminum flake
3.0
butane di-ol dimethacrylate
84.5
curing agents
0.5
The foregoing example produces an isolation barrier material composition that, upon application to the dental substrate and polymerization, is sufficiently weakened to facilitate its removal in discrete, tooth-sized segments or larger with a tweezers-like instrument from the dental substrate after use in a dental procedure. The barrier material also is configured to decrease the polymerization reaction rate and reflect excessive light radiant energy to thereby resist thermal tissue damage due to substantial heat production during polymerization.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims and their combination in whole or in part rather than by the foregoing description. All changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
Fischer, Dan E., Jensen, Steven D.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
8641419, | Jul 25 2007 | Methods and devices for fixed dental restoration | |
9486393, | Dec 18 2009 | CAO Group, Inc | Single component tooth root sealer |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4303066, | Jun 28 1979 | National Patent Development Corporation | Burn dressing |
4531914, | Jul 27 1981 | Dental device and method for gingival retraction and conditioning | |
4846165, | Jul 31 1984 | DENTSPLY MANAGEMENT | Wound dressing membrane |
5213498, | May 01 1990 | Advantage Dental Products, Inc. | Method for making a custom impression tray |
5296513, | Dec 21 1988 | Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd. | Dental composition and process for producing dental polymeric shaped articles |
5410016, | Oct 15 1990 | BOARD OF REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM, THE | Photopolymerizable biodegradable hydrogels as tissue contacting materials and controlled-release carriers |
5472991, | Jan 20 1988 | 3M ESPE AG; ESPE Dental AG | Two-stage photocuring process for a dental composition |
5534562, | Apr 07 1995 | Ultradent Products, Inc. | Compositions and methods for priming and sealing dental and biological substrates |
5573934, | Apr 20 1992 | BOARD OF REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM, THE | Gels for encapsulation of biological materials |
5587406, | Aug 02 1993 | Sun Medical Co., Ltd. | Primer composition and curable composition |
5661222, | Apr 13 1995 | Dentsply Research & Development Corp. | Polyvinylsiloxane impression material |
5676543, | Mar 08 1995 | Centrix, Inc. | Gum tissue retraction device and method |
5900245, | Sep 23 1996 | Genzyme Corporation | Compliant tissue sealants |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 19 2001 | Ultradent Products, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 11 2007 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 22 2007 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Nov 05 2007 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Sep 14 2011 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 11 2008 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 11 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 11 2009 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 11 2011 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 11 2012 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 11 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 11 2013 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 11 2015 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 11 2016 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 11 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 11 2017 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 11 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |