This invention is related to an adhesive composition which may be used to bond or seal tissue in vivo. The adhesive composition is readily formed from a two component mixture which includes a first part of a protein, preferably a serum albumin protein, in an aqueous buffer having a pH in the range of about 8.0-11.0 and a second part of a water-compatible or water-soluble bifunctional crosslinking agent. When the two parts of the mixture are combined, the mixture is initially a liquid which cures in vivo on the surface of tissue in less than about one minute to give a strong, flexible, pliant substantive composition which bonds to the tissue and is absorbed in about four to sixty days. The adhesive composition may be used either to bond tissue, to seal tissue or to prevent tissue adhesions caused by surgery.
|
0. 119. A method of treating tissue comprising:
providing a composition to tissue, said composition including an albumin protein and a crosslinking agent, said crosslinking agent having a polyoxyethylene chain portion and an activated leaving group which allows the crosslinking agent to react with said protein; and
curing said composition on the tissue to bond said composition to the tissue and to provide a substantive cured matrix.
0. 84. A method of treating tissue to bind layers of tissue together comprising:
providing a composition to tissue, said composition including an albumin protein and a crosslinking agent, said crosslinking agent having a polyoxyethylene chain portion and an activated leaving group which allows the crosslinking agent to react with said protein; and
curing said composition on the tissue to bond said composition to the tissue and to provide a substantive cured matrix.
0. 52. A method of treating tissue to prevent formation of an adhesion comprising:
providing a composition to tissue, said composition including an albumin protein and a crosslinking agent, said crosslinking agent having a polyoxyethylene chain portion and an activated leaving group which allows the crosslinking agent to react with said protein; and
curing said composition on the tissue to bond said composition to the tissue and to provide a substantive cured matrix.
0. 18. A method of treating tissue to prevent or control air or fluid leaks comprising:
providing a composition to tissue, said composition including an albumin protein and a crosslinking agent, said crosslinking agent having a polyoxyethylene chain portion and an activated leaving group which allows the crosslinking agent to react with said protein; and
curing said composition on the tissue to bond said composition to the tissue and to provide a substantive cured matrix.
0. 261. A method of treating tissue comprising:
providing a composition to tissue, said composition including an albumin protein and a crosslinking agent at about 20-60 wt/vol %, said crosslinking agent of about 50-800 mg/ml having a polyoxyethylene chain portion and an activated leaving group which allows the crosslinking agent to react with said protein and having a molecular weight in a range of about 1000-15,000; and
curing said composition on the tissue to bond said composition to the tissue and to provide a substantive cured matrix.
0. 163. A method of treating tissue to prevent or control air or fluid leaks comprising:
providing a composition to tissue, said composition including an albumin protein at about 20-60 wt/vol % and a crosslinking agent at about 50-800 mg/ml, said crosslinking agent having a polyoxyethylene chain portion and an activated leaving group which allows the crosslinking agent to react with said protein and having a molecular weight of about 1000-15,000; and
curing said composition on the tissue to bond said composition to the tissue and to provide a substantive cured matrix.
0. 227. A method of treating tissue to bind layers of tissue together comprising:
providing a composition to tissue, said composition including an albumin protein of about 20-60 wt/vol % and a crosslinking agent at about 50-800 mg/ml, said crosslinking agent having a polyoxyethylene chain portion and an activated leaving group which allows the crosslinking agent to react with said protein having a molecular weight in a range of about 1000-15,000; and
curing said composition on the tissue to bond said composition to the tissue and to provide a substantive cured matrix.
0. 196. A method of treating tissue to prevent formation of an adhesion comprising:
providing a composition to tissue, said composition including an albumin protein at about 20-60 wt/vol % and a crosslinking agent at about 50-800 mg/ml, said crosslinking agent having a polyoxyethylene chain portion and an activated leaving group which allows the crosslinking agent to react with said protein and having a molecular weight in a range of about 1000-15,000; and
curing said composition on the tissue to bond said composition to the tissue and to provide a substantive cured matrix.
0. 1. An adhesive composition consisting essentially of
i) a first aqueous mixture of about 20-60 wt/vol % serum albumin in about 0.01-0.25 molar buffer at a pH in a range of about 8.0-11.0,
ii) a second aqueous mixture of about 50-800 mg/ml of a crosslinking agent having a molecular weight in a range of about 1,000-15,000, wherein the crosslinking agent is of the formula
G—LM—PEG—LM—G wherein —PEG— is a diradical fragment represented by the formula
—O—(CH2—CH2—O—)a— where a is an integer from 20-300;
wherein —LM— is a diradical fragment selected from the group consisting of a carbonate diradical of the formula, —C(O)—, a monoester diradical of the formula, —(CH2)bC(O)— where b is an integer from 1-5, a diester radical of the formula, —C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10 and where the aliphatic portion of the diradical may be saturated or unsaturated, a dicarbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where d is an integer from 2-10, and an oligomeric diradical represented by the formulas —R—C(O)—, —R—C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)—, or —R—C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10, d is an integer from 2-10, and R is a polymer or copolymer having 1-10 monomeric fragments selected from the group consisting of lactide, glycolide, trimethylene carbonate, caprolactone and p-dioxanone; and
wherein —G is a leaving group selected from the group consisting of succinimidyl, maleimidyl, phthalimidyl, imidazolyl, nitrophenyl or tresyl, and
wherein a combination of the first and second mixtures is initially liquid and then cures on the surface of tissue to give a flexible, substantive matrix which bonds to the tissue and has a burst strength greater than about 10 mmHg.
0. 2. The adhesive mixture of
0. 3. The adhesive composition of
0. 4. The adhesive composition of
0. 5. The adhesive composition of
0. 6. The adhesive composition of
0. 7. The adhesive composition of
0. 8. The adhesive composition of
0. 9. An in vivo method of adhering tissue comprising the steps of topically applying and bonding an adhesive mixture of
0. 10. An in vivo method of sealing air leaks in pulmonary tissues comprising the steps of topically applying and curing the adhesive mixture of claims 1 to an air leak site in the pulmonary tissue.
0. 11. An in vivo method to prevent post-surgical adhesions comprising the step of topically applying and curing the adhesive mixture of claims 1 to tissue surrounding a surgical site.
0. 12. An in vivo method to seal tissue comprising the step of topically applying and bonding the adhesive mixture of claims 1 to tissue to prevent or control blood or other fluid leaks.
0. 13. The adhesive composition of
0. 14. The adhesive composition of
0. 15. The adhesive mixture of
0. 16. The adhesive composition of
0. 17. A method of making a tissue adhesive consisting of the step of forming a mixture of
i) a first aqueous mixture of about 20-60 wt/vol % serum albumin in about 0.01-0.25 molar buffer at a pH in a range of about 8.0-11.0,
ii) a second aqueous mixture of about 50-800 mg/ml of a crosslinking agent having a molecular weight in a range of about 1,000-15,000, wherein the crosslinking agent is of the formula
G—LM—PEG—LM—G
wherein —PEG— is a diradical fragment represented by the formula
—O—(CH2—CH2—O—)a— where a is an integer from 20-300;
wherein —LM— is a diradical fragment selected from the group consisting of a carbonate diradical of the formula, —C(O)—, a monoester diradical of the formula, —(CH2)bC(O)— where b is an integer from 1-5, a diester diradical of the formula, —C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10 and where the aliphatic portion of the diradical may be saturated or unsaturated, a dicarbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where d is an integer from 2-10, and an oligomeric diradical represented by the formulas —R—C(O)—, —R—C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)—, or —R—C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10, d is an integer from 2-10, and R is a polymer or copolymer having 1-10 monomeric fragments selected from the group consisting of lactide, glycolide, trimethylene carbonate, caprolactone and p-dioxanone; and
wherein —G is a leaving group selected from the group consisting of succinimidyl, maleimidyl, phthalimidyl, imidazolyl, nitrophenyl or tresyl, and
wherein a combination of the first and second mixtures is initially liquid and then cures on the surface of tissue to give a flexible, substantive matrix which bonds to the tissue and has a burst strength greater than about 10 mmHg.
0. 19. The method of
0. 20. The method of
0. 21. The method of
0. 22. The method of
0. 23. The method of
0. 24. The method of
0. 25. The method of
0. 26. The method of
0. 27. The method of
0. 28. The method of
0. 29. The method of
0. 30. The method of
0. 31. The method of
0. 32. The method of
0. 33. The method of
0. 34. The method of
0. 35. The method of
0. 36. The method of
wherein the first mixture includes about 20-60 wt/vol % of the protein in about 0.01-0.25 molar buffer at a pH in a range of about 8.0-11.0 and the second mixture includes about 50-800 mg/ml of the crosslinking agent having a molecular weight in a range of about 1,000-15,000.
0. 37. The method of
G—LM—PEG—LM—G wherein:
—PEG— is a diradical fragment represented by the formula
—O—(CH2—CH2—O—)a—
where a is an integer from 20-300;
—LM— is a diradical fragment selected from the group consisting of a carbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—, a monoester diradical of the formula —(CH2)bC(O)— where b is an integer from 1-5, a diester diradical of the formula —C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10 and where the aliphatic portion of the diradical may be saturated or unsaturated, a dicarbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where d is an integer from 2-10, and an oligomeric diradical represented by the formulas —R—C(O)—, —R—C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)—, or —R—C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10, d is an integer from 2-10, and R is a polymer or copolymer having 1-10 monomeric fragments selected from the group consisting of lactide, glycolide, trimethylene carbonate, caprolactone, and p-dioxanone; and
—G is the leaving group selected from the group consisting of succinimidyl, maleimidyl, phthalimidyl, imidazolyl, nitrophenyl, and tresyl.
0. 38. The method of
0. 39. The method of
0. 40. The method of
0. 41. The method of
0. 42. The method of
0. 43. The method of
0. 44. The method of
0. 45. The method of
0. 46. The method of
0. 47. The method of
0. 48. The method of
0. 49. The method of
0. 50. The method of
0. 51. The method of
0. 53. The method of
0. 54. The method of
0. 55. The method of
0. 56. The method of
0. 57. The method of
0. 58. The method of
0. 59. The method of
0. 60. The method of
0. 61. The method of
0. 62. The method of
0. 63. The method of
0. 64. The method of
0. 65. The method of
0. 66. The method of
0. 67. The method of
0. 68. The method of
0. 69. The method of
0. 70. The method of
wherein the first mixture includes about 20-60 wt/vol % of the protein in about 0.01-0.25 molar buffer at a pH in a range of about 8.0-11.0 and the second mixture includes about 50-800 mg/ml of the crosslinking agent having a molecular weight in a range of about 1,000-15,000.
0. 71. The method of
G—LM—PEG—LM—G wherein:
—PEG— is a diradical fragment represented by the formula
—O—(CH2—CH2—O—)a— wherein a is an integer from 20-300;
—LM— is a diradical fragment selected from the group consisting of a carbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—, a monoester diradical of the formula —(CH2)bC(O)— where b is an integer from 1-5, a diester diradical of the formula —C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10 and where the aliphatic portion of the diradical may be saturated or unsaturated, a dicarbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where d is an integer from 2-10, and an oligomeric diradical represented by the formulas —R—C(O)—, —R—C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)—, or —R—C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10, d is an integer from 2-10, and R is a polymer or copolymer having 1-10 monomeric fragments selected from the group consisting of lactide, glycolide, trimethylene carbonate, caprolactone, and p-dioxanone; and
—G is the leaving group selected from the group consisting of succinimidyl, maleimidyl, phthalimidyl, imidazolyl, nitrophenyl, and tresyl.
0. 72. The method of
0. 73. The method of
0. 74. The method of
0. 75. The method of
0. 76. The method of
0. 77. The method of
0. 78. The method of
0. 79. The method of
0. 80. The method of
0. 81. The method of
0. 82. The method of
0. 83. The method of
0. 85. The method of
0. 86. The method of
0. 87. The method of
0. 88. The method of
0. 89. The method of
0. 90. The method of
0. 91. The method of
0. 92. The method of
0. 93. The method of
0. 94. The method of
0. 95. The method of
0. 96. The method of
0. 97. The method of
0. 98. The method of
0. 99. The method of
0. 100. The method of
0. 101. The method of
0. 102. The method of
wherein the first mixture includes about 20-60 wt/vol % of the protein in about 0.01-0.25 molar buffer at a pH in a range of about 8.0-11.0 and the second mixture includes about 50-800 mg/ml of the crosslinking agent having a molecular weight in a range of about 1,000-15,000.
0. 103. The method of
G—LM—PEG—LM—G wherein:
—PEG— is a diradical fragment represented by the formula
—O—(CH2—CH2—O—)a— where a is an integer from 20-300;
—LM— is a diradical fragment selected from the group consisting of a carbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—, a monoester diradical of the formula —(CH2)bC(O)— where b is an integer from 1-5, a diester diradical of the formula —C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10 and where the aliphatic portion of the diradical may be saturated or unsaturated, a dicarbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where d is an integer from 2-10, and an oligomeric diradical represented by the formulas —R—C(O)—, —R—C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)—, or —R—C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10, d is an integer from 2-10, and R is a polymer or copolymer having 1-10 monomeric fragments selected from the group consisting of lactide, glycolide, trimethylene carbonate, caprolactone, and p-dioxanone; and
—G is the leaving group selected from the group consisting of succinimidyl, maleimidyl, phthalimidyl, imidazolyl, nitrophenyl, and tresyl.
0. 104. The method of
0. 105. The method of
0. 106. The method of
0. 107. The method of
0. 108. The method of
0. 109. The method of
0. 110. The method of
0. 111. The method of
0. 112. The method of
0. 113. The method of
0. 114. The method of
0. 115. The method of
0. 116. The method of
0. 117. The method of
0. 118. The method of
0. 120. The method of
0. 121. The method of
0. 122. The method of
0. 123. The method of
0. 124. The method of
0. 125. The method of
0. 126. The method of
0. 127. The method of
0. 128. The method of
0. 129. The method of
0. 130. The method of
0. 131. The method of
0. 132. The method of
0. 133. The method of
0. 134. The method of
0. 135. The method of
0. 136. The method of
0. 137. The method of
wherein the first mixture includes about 20-60 wt/vol % of the protein in about 0.01-0.25 molar buffer at a pH in a range of about 8.0-11.0 and the second mixture includes about 50-800 mg/ml of the crosslinking agent having a molecular weight in a range of about 1,000-15,000.
0. 138. The method of
G—LM—PEG—LM—G wherein:
—PEG— is a diradical fragment represented by the formula
—O—(CH2—CH2—O—)a—
where a is an integer from 20-300;
—LM— is a diradical fragment selected from the group consisting of a carbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—, a monoester diradical of the formula —(CH2)bC(O)— where b is an integer from 1-5, a diester diradical of the formula —C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10 and where the aliphatic portion of the diradical may be saturated or unsaturated, a dicarbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where d is an integer from 2-10, and an oligomeric diradical represented by the formulas —R—C(O)—, —R—C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)—, or —R—C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10, d is an integer from 2-10, and R is a polymer or copolymer having 1-10 monomeric fragments selected from the group consisting of lactide, glycolide, trimethylene carbonate, caprolactone, and p-dioxanone; and
—G is the leaving group selected from the group consisting of succinimidyl, maleimidyl, phthalimidyl, imidazolyl, nitrophenyl, and tresyl.
0. 139. The method of
0. 140. The method of
0. 141. The method of
0. 142. The method of
0. 143. The method of
0. 144. The method of
0. 145. The method of
0. 146. The method of
0. 147. The method of
0. 148. The method of
0. 149. The method of
0. 150. The method of
0. 151. The method of
0. 152. The method of
0. 153. The method of
0. 154. The method of
0. 155. The method of claims 119 comprising curing the composition at the tissue to prevent a tissue adhesion.
0. 156. The method of
0. 157. The method of
0. 158. The method of
0. 159. The method of
0. 160. The method of
0. 161. The method of
0. 162. The method of
0. 164. The method of
0. 165. The method of
0. 166. The method of
0. 167. The method of
0. 168. The method of
0. 169. The method of
0. 170. The method of
0. 171. The method of
0. 172. The method of
0. 173. The method of
0. 174. The method of
0. 175. The method of
0. 176. The method of
0. 177. The method of
0. 178. The method of
0. 179. The method of
0. 180. The method of
wherein the first mixture includes about 20-60 wt/vol % of the protein in about 0.01-0.25 molar buffer at a pH in a range of about 8.0-11.0 and the second mixture includes about 50-800 mg/ml of the crosslinking agent having a molecular weight in a range of about 1,000-15,000.
0. 181. The method of
G—LM—PEG—LM—G wherein:
—PEG— is a diradical fragment represented by the formula
—O—(CH2—CH2—O—)a— where a is an integer from 20-300;
—LM— is a diradical fragment selected from the group consisting of a carbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—, a monoester diradical of the formula —(CH2)bC(O)— where b is an integer from 1-5, a diester diradical of the formula —C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10 and where the aliphatic portion of the diradical may be saturated or unsaturated, a dicarbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where d is an integer from 2-10, and an oligomeric diradical represented by the formulas —R—C(O)—, —R—C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)—, or —R—C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10, d is an integer from 2-10, and R is a polymer or copolymer having 1-10 monomeric fragments selected from the group consisting of lactide, glycolide, trimethylene carbonate, caprolactone, and p-dioxanone; and
—G is the leaving group selected from the group consisting of succinimidyl, maleimidyl, phthalimidyl, imidazolyl, nitrophenyl, and tresyl.
0. 182. The method of
0. 183. The method of
0. 184. The method of
0. 185. The method of
0. 186. The method of
0. 187. The method of
0. 188. The method of
0. 189. The method of
0. 190. The method of
0. 191. The method of
0. 192. The method of
0. 193. The method of
0. 194. The method of
0. 195. The method of
0. 197. The method of
0. 198. The method of
0. 199. The method of
0. 200. The method of
0. 201. The method of
0. 202. The method of
0. 203. The method of
0. 204. The method of
0. 205. The method of
0. 206. The method of
0. 207. The method of
0. 208. The method of
0. 209. The method of
0. 210. The method of
0. 211. The method of
0. 212. The method of
0. 213. The method of
wherein the first mixture includes about 20-60 wt/vol % of the protein in about 0.01-0.25 molar buffer at a pH in a range of about 8.0-11.0 and the second mixture includes about 50-800 mg/ml of the crosslinking agent having a molecular weight in a range of about 1,000-15,000.
0. 214. The method of
G—LM—PEG—LM—G wherein:
—PEG— is a diradical fragment represented by the formula
—O—(CH2—CH2—O—)a— where a is an integer from 20-300;
—LM— is a diradical fragment selected from the group consisting of a carbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—, a monoester diradical of the formula —(CH2)bC(O)— where b is an integer from 1-5, a diester diradical of the formula —C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10 and where the aliphatic portion of the diradical may be saturated or unsaturated, a dicarbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where d is an integer from 2-10, and an oligomeric diradical represented by the formulas —R—C(O)—, —R—C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)—, or —R—C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10, d is an integer from 2-10, and R is a polymer or copolymer having 1-10 monomeric fragments selected from the group consisting of lactide, glycolide, trimethylene carbonate, caprolactone, and p-dioxanone; and
—G is the leaving group selected from the group consisting of succinimidyl, maleimidyl, phthalimidyl, imidazolyl, nitrophenyl, and tresyl.
0. 215. The method of
0. 216. The method of
0. 217. The method of
0. 218. The method of
0. 219. The method of
0. 220. The method of
0. 221. The method of
0. 222. The method of
0. 223. The method of
0. 224. The method of
0. 225. The method of
0. 226. The method of
0. 228. The method of
0. 229. The method of
0. 230. The method of
0. 231. The method of
0. 232. The method of
0. 233. The method of
0. 234. The method of
0. 235. The method of
0. 236. The method of
0. 237. The method of
0. 238. The method of
0. 239. The method of
0. 240. The method of
0. 241. The method of
0. 242. The method of
0. 243. The method of
0. 244. The method of
wherein the first mixture includes about 20-60 wt/vol % of the protein in about 0.01-0.25 molar buffer at a pH in a range of about 8.0-11.0 and the second mixture includes about 50-800 mg/ml of the crosslinking agent having a molecular weight in a range of about 1,000-15,000.
0. 245. The method of
G—LM—PEG—LM—G wherein:
—PEG— is a diradical fragment represented by the formula
—O—(CH2—CH2—O—)a— where a is an integer from 20-300;
—LM— is a diradical fragment selected from the group consisting of a carbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—, a monoester diradical of the formula —(CH2)bC(O)— where b is an integer from 1-5, a diester diradical of the formula —C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10 and where the aliphatic portion of the diradical may be saturated or unsaturated, a dicarbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where d is an integer from 2-10, and an oligomeric diradical represented by the formulas —R—C(O)—, —R—C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)—, or —R—C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10, d is an integer from 2-10, and R is a polymer or copolymer having 1-10 monomeric fragments selected from the group consisting of lactide, glycolide, trimethylene carbonate, caprolactone, and p-dioxanone; and
—G is the leaving group selected from the group consisting of succinimidyl, maleimidyl, phthalimidyl, imidazolyl, nitrophenyl, and tresyl.
0. 246. The method of
0. 247. The method of
0. 248. The method of
0. 249. The method of
0. 250. The method of
0. 251. The method of
0. 252. The method of
0. 253. The method of
0. 254. The method of
0. 255. The method of
0. 256. The method of
0. 257. The method of
0. 258. The method of
0. 259. The method of
0. 260. The method of
0. 262. The method of
0. 263. The method of
0. 264. The method of
0. 265. The method of
0. 266. The method of
0. 267. The method of
0. 268. The method of
0. 269. The method of
0. 270. The method of
0. 271. The method of
0. 272. The method of
0. 273. The method of
0. 274. The method of
0. 275. The method of
0. 276. The method of
0. 277. The method of
0. 278. The method of
wherein the first mixture includes about 20-60 wt/vol % of the protein in about 0.01-0.25 molar buffer at a pH in a range of about 8.0-11.0 and the second mixture includes about 50-800 mg/ml of the crosslinking agent having a molecular weight in a range of about 1,000-15,000.
0. 279. The method of
G—LM—PEG—LM—G wherein:
—PEG— is a diradical fragment represented by the formula
—O—(CH2—CH2—O—)a— where a is an integer from 20-300;
—LM— is a diradical fragment selected from the group consisting of a carbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—, a monoester diradical of the formula —(CH2)bC(O)— where b is an integer from 1-5, a diester diradical of the formula —C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10 and where the aliphatic portion of the diradical may be saturated or unsaturated, a dicarbonate diradical of the formula —C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where d is an integer from 2-10, and an oligomeric diradical represented by the formulas —R—C(O)—, —R—C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)—, or —R—C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—(C)O— where c is an integer from 2-10, d is an integer from 2-10, and R is a polymer or copolymer having 1-10 monomeric fragments selected from the group consisting of lactide, glycolide, trimethylene carbonate, caprolactone, and p-dioxanone; and
—G is the leaving group selected from the group consisting of succinimidyl, maleimidyl, phthalimidyl, imidazolyl, nitrophenyl, and tresyl.
0. 280. The method of
0. 281. The method of
0. 282. The method of
0. 283. The method of
0. 284. The method of
0. 285. The method of
0. 286. The method of
0. 287. The method of
0. 288. The method of
0. 289. The method of
0. 290. The method of
0. 291. The method of
0. 292. The method of
0. 293. The method of
0. 294. The method of
0. 295. The method of
0. 296. The method of claims 261 comprising curing the composition at the tissue to prevent a tissue adhesion.
0. 297. The method of
0. 298. The method of
0. 299. The method of
0. 300. The method of
0. 301. The method of
0. 302. The method of
0. 303. The method of
|
in which —PEG— is a diradical fragment represented by the formula
—O—(CH2—CH2—O—)a—
where a is an integer from 20-300; —LM— is also a diradical fragment such as a carbonate diradical represented by the formula, —C(O)—, a monoester diradical represented by the formula, —(CH2)bC(O)— where b is an integer from 1-5, a diester diradical represented by the formula, −C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10 and where the aliphatic portion of the radical may be saturated or unsaturated, a dicarbonate represented by the formula —C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where d is an integer from 2-10, or an oligomeric diradical represented by the formulas —R—C(O)—, —R—C(O)—(CH2)c—C(O)—, or —R—C(O)—O—(CH2)d—O—C(O)— where c is an integer from 2-10, d is an integer from 2-10, and R is a polymer or copolymer having 1-10 monomeric lactide, glycolide, trimethylene carbonate, caprolactone and p-dioxanone fragments; and —G is a leaving group such as a succinimidyl, maleimidyl, phthalimidyl, or alternatively, nitrophenyl, imidazolyl or tresyl leaving groups.
The —PEG— portion of the crosslinking agent is preferably derived from commercially available compounds having a weight average molecular weight in the range of about 1,000-15,000, preferably having a weight average molecular weight in the range of about 2,000-4,000. These compounds have been used in different types of biomedical materials because they have been demonstrated to be non-toxic as well as rapidly excreted from the body when the molecular weight is below about 30,000.
The leaving group, —G, portion of the crosslinking agent is an activated leaving group which allows the crosslinking agent to react or chemically bind to free primary or secondary amine groups of a protein. Suitable leaving groups include succinimidyl, other imides such as maleimidyl and phthalimidyl, heterocyclic leaving groups such as imidazolyl, aromatic leaving groups such as a nitrophenyl, or fluorinated alkylsulfone leaving groups such as tresyl (CF3—CH2—SO2—O—). A preferred leaving group is the succinimidyl group because studies of the mutagenicity, oncogenicity and teratogenicity of this group suggest that the small amount of this activating group which is released as the crosslinking reaction and/or the adhesive composition cures does not present a local or systemic toxicology risk.
When used in the present composition the linking moiety, —LM—, may be several different types of divalent compounds. For example, commercially available compounds having the —PEG— portion and the —G portion linked with a saturated dicarboxylic acid such as succinic acid to give a saturated diester linking moiety. Alternatively, an unsaturated dicarboxylic acid such as fumaric, maleic, phthalic or terephthalic acid may be used to give an unsaturated diester linking moiety. Alternatively, the linking moiety may be a readily hydrolyzable compounds such as oligomer derivatives of polylactic acid, polyglycolic acid, polydioxanone, polytrimethylene carbonate, or polycaprolactone as well as copolymers made using suitable monomers of these listed polymers.
In another embodiment of this invention an activated leaving group may be attached directly to a carbonate ester of polyethylene glycol. In this embodiment the linking moiety, —LM—, would be a carbonate group, —C(O)— between the —PEG— and —G portions of the crosslinking agent. In still other embodiments of this invention the linking moiety may be a dicarbonate such as ethylene carbonate which is prepared by linking the —PEG and —G portions with ethylene bischloroformate.
The crosslinking agents may be prepared using known processes, procedures or synthetic methods such as the procedures reported in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,101,380 or 4,839,345, the procedure reported in International Application Ser. No. PCT/US90/02133 filed Apr. 19, 1990 or the procedure reported by Abuchowski et al., Cancer Biochem. Biophys., 7:175-186 (1984). Briefly, polyethylene glycol and a suitable acid anhydride are dissolved in a suitable polar organic solvent in the presence of base and refluxed for a period of time sufficient to form a polyethylene glycol diester diacid. The diester diacid is then reacted with a leaving group such as an N-hydroxy imide compound in a suitable polar organic solvent in the presence of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide or other condensing agents and stirred at room temperature to form the desired bifunctional crosslinking agent.
Alternatively, polyethylene glycol and a suitable dicarboxylic acid chloride or bischloroformate may be dissolved in a suitable polar organic solvent for a period of time sufficient to form the mixed acid chloride polyethylene glycol ester or mixed chloroformate polyethylene glycol ester. The mixed esters may then be reacted with a compound such as an N-hydroxy imide compound in a suitable polar organic solvent and stirred at an elevated temperature for a period of time sufficient to form the desired bifunctional crosslinking agent.
It has also been found that the cure time of the present adhesive compositions may be tailored by use of buffers having different pH values. For example, by varying the pH of the buffer it is possible to change the cure rate time from about 10 seconds to less than about 10 minutes. Briefly, mixing concentrated aqueous serum albumin and crosslinking agent mixtures with higher concentrations of buffer provides the fastest cure times. It has also been found that higher concentrations of protein and crosslinking agent provide a relatively stronger, cured matrix. However, if the mixtures are too concentrated and viscosity becomes too great, these adhesive compositions are not as readily applied or may provide adhesives with undesired properties. For example, mixtures which are too viscous may not be readily applied using available applicators such as syringes or spray apparatus. In addition, if the concentration of crosslinking agent is too high, the resulting cured adhesive matrix may swell to such an extent that the strength of the matrix in the presence of water or other fluids is lowered. Further, ability to adequately mix the two components using injecting and/or spraying apparatus may be reduced.
The two component adhesive composition of the present invention may be applied to tissue in a number of different ways. For example, the adhesive may be quickly mixed together and then applied using common applicators. Alternatively the two components may be mixed together and then applied as spray. In another application method, the two parts of the adhesive are added to a dual syringe. The two barrels of the syringe are attached to a “Y” connect which is fitted to a spiral mixer nozzle. As the two components are pressed out of the syringe, they are mixed in the nozzle and may be directly applied to the tissue as needed in a relatively uniform, controlled manner. Alternatively, a spray nozzle tip, such as a TISSEEL spray tip sold by Immuno AG, Vienna, Austria for use with a two-component fibrin sealant kit, may be used in place of the spiral mixer nozzle. In this application, a fine spray of the adhesive composition is deposited on tissue as the plungers of the syringe are depressed.
The adhesive composition of the present invention may be used in a variety of current medical procedures an practices. In one application, the present adhesive composition may be used to eliminate or substantially reduce the number of sutures normally required using current practices as well as eliminate the need for subsequent removal of certain sutures. In another application, this adhesive composition may be used to attach skin grafts and to position tissue flaps or free flaps during reconstructive surgery. In still another application, this adhesive composition may be used to close gingival flaps in periodontal surgery. In all of these applications, the present adhesive composition is a thin layer of cured material which is effectively sandwiched between two adjacent layers of living tissues. Due to bioabsorbability and lack of toxicity of the adhesive composition, the healing and subsequent reattachment of the two layers of tissue to each other is not hampered.
In addition to the use of the present adhesive composition as an adhesive per se, the present composition may also be used as a sealant. When used in this application, this composition may be used to prevent air leaks now associated with pulmonary surgery or to inhibit or prevent bleeding in other surgical procedures. When used in this manner, the underlying tissue may be coated with a relatively thick layer of adhesive since the tissue itself needs to only heal on one side. The other side of the of the adhesive, when cured, simply presents a lubricous gel which will be absorbed in vivo in a relatively short period of time from about four to sixty days. In view of this property of the present adhesive composition, it may also be used to prevent unwanted tissues adhesions which are associated with current surgical procedures.
The following examples are intended to describe and illustrate the practice of the claimed invention. The examples, however, should not be construed to limit the scope of the present invention which is defined by the appended claims.
The following procedures were used to prepare several different types of bifunctional crosslinking agents. The following procedures are modifications of procedures reported in U.S. Pat. No. 4,101,380 and Abuchowski et al., cited above.
Synthesis Of Polyethylene Glycol Disuccinimidyl Succinate PEG-SS2
Polyethylene glycol, PEG, (50 g, Aldrich Chemical Company, Milwaukee, Wis., sold as 3,400 average molecular weight, GPC analysis Mn was 2,980, Mw, was 3,480) was dissolved in 1,2-dichloroethane (250 ml) containing succinic arthydride (14.7 g) and anhydrous pyridine (12 ml). The mixture was refluxed under nitrogen for three days. After filtration and evaporation of the solvent, the residue was dissolved in 100 ml water and treated with the cation exchange resin Dowex™ 50 (H+) (50 g) for 30 minutes. The mixture was then filtered and the Dowex™ 50 was washed with water (50 ml 1×). The combined filtrate was washed with anhydrous diethyl ether (50 ml 2×). The PEG-disuccinate was then extracted from the water phase with two 100 ml chloroform washes. Evaporation of chloroform yielded about 49 g of PEG-disuccinate.
The PEG-disuccinate was dissolved in 200 ml N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) at 37° C. and 4.23 g of N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) were added to the solution. The mixture was cooled to 0° C. 7.58 g of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) were dissolved in 50 ml DMF and added dropwise to the above solution with continuous stirring. The mixture was left at room temperature for 24 hours and filtered. 100 ml of toluene were added to the filtrate and the solution was placed in an ice bath. The desired polyethylene glycol disuccinimidyl succinate product, PEG-SS2, was precipitated by slowly adding petroleum ether. The precipitate was collected on a 10-20 micron sintered glass filter. Dissolution in toluene and precipitation with petroleum ether was repeated three times. The PEG-SS2 was further purified by dissolving in 100 ml of 0.1M pH 2.2 citrate/phosphate buffer and filtering through a 4-8 micron sintered glass filter. The PEG-SS2 was extracted with chloroform (100 ml 2×) and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure in a rotary evaporator. The PEG-SS2 was then dissolved in toluene and precipitated with petroleum ether, dried under vacuum overnight at room temperature, and stored in a refrigerator.
Synthesis of N-hydroxysuccinimide Ester of Dicarboxymethyl Polyethylene Glycol
Dicarboxymethyl poly(ethylene glycol) (mol. wt. 3400) purchased from Shearwater Polymers, Inc., Huntsville, Ala. (5 g) and N-hydroxysuccinimide purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo. (1 g) were dissolved in 30 ml of anhydrous DMF with mechanical stirring under nitrogen. The solution was cooled to 0° C. and a solution of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (1.79 g) in 5 ml DMF was added dropwise. The stirring was continued in the cold for 3 hours then at room temperature overnight (16 hrs). Dicyclohexylurea which precipitated was removed by filtration. Toluene (100 ml) was added to the filtrate and cooled to 0° C. The product was then precipitated by addition of petroleum ether. The precipitate was collected on a sintered glass filter. Dissolution in toluene and reprecipitation with petroleum ether was repeated three times. The product was dried under vacuum in a desiccator.
Synthesis of Polyethylene Glycol-di-oligoglycolide Disuccinimidyl Succinate
A 500 ml three neck round bottom flask was flame dried under nitrogen. 50 g of PEG (mol. wt. 3400), 300 ml of xylene, and 1 drop of 0.33M stannous ottoate solution in xylene were charged into the flask with a continuous nitrogen purge. The flask was heated to boil the solution and 50 ml of xylene were removed by distillation. The solution was then cooled to room temperature. 17 g of glycolide (Boehfinger Ingleheim KG, Ingleheim, Germany) was added to the flask and the reaction mixture was refluxed under nitrogen for 16 hours. The copolymer reaction mixture was filtered hot to remove polyglycolide homopolymer. The copolymer then precipitated from the filtrate upon cooling and collected by filtration. The copolymer was placed in a flask with 500 ml of dichloromethane and 7 g of succinyl chloride. The solution was refluxed under nitrogen overnight (16 hours). 8.5 g of N-hydroxysuccinimide was added to the flask and refluxing was continued for another overnight period. A white solid was obtained by precipitation upon cooling the solution. The product was then purified by redissolving in toluene and reprecipitating with petroleum ether several times. The final precipitate was dried under vacuum and stored in a desiccator. The structure of the product was confirmed by NMR analysis.
Synthesis of Polyethylene Glycol-dimaleimidyl Succinate
About 12 g of PEG-disuccinate and 1 g N-hydroxymaleimide (Aldrich Chemical Co.) were placed in a 250 ml three neck round bottom flask with 50 ml of anhydrous DMF under nitrogen. The mixture was dissolved at 60° C. with mechanical stirring and cooled to 0° C. A solution of 1.82 g dicyclohexylcarbodiimide in DMF (5 ml) was added dropwise to the flask. The reaction was allowed to mix overnight under nitrogen at room temperature. Dicyclohexylurea was removed by filtration and the product was obtained by adding toluene and precipitating with petroleum ether. Dissolution in toluene and reprecipitation with petroleum ether were repeated three times. The purified product was dried under vacuum and stored in a desiccator.
Synthesis of Polyethylene Glycol-diphthalimidyl Succinate
About 15 g of PEG-disuccinate and 1.65 g N-hydroxyphthalimide (Aldrich Chemical Co.) were placed in a 250 ml three neck round bottom flask with 30 ml of anhydrous DMF under nitrogen. The mixture was dissolved at 60° C. with mechanical stirring and cooled to 0° C. A solution of 1.82 g dicyclohexylcarbodiimide in DMF (5 ml) was added dropwise to the flask. The reaction was allowed to mix overnight under nitrogen at room temperature. Dicyclohexylurea was removed by filtration and the product was obtained by adding toluene and precipitating with petroleum ether. Dissolution in toluene and reprecipitation with petroleum ether were repeated three times. The purified product was dried under vacuum and stored in a desiccator.
Preparation of Two Component Adhesive
The following procedure was used to prepare a two-component adhesive using a variety of protein sources, and bifunctional crosslinking agents. Aqueous solutions of a protein and a crosslinking agent as listed in Table 1 were pipetted (0.2 ml of each solution) into a porcelain test well and mixed continuously with a stainless steel rod. The cure time and physical consistency of each of the two component adhesives are also listed in Table 1.
The data indicated that fish and bovine gelatin, egg and serum albumin as well as casein protein crosslinked with PEG-SS2 provided an adhesive which was very elastic, had good adhesive strength and a relatively rapid cure rate.
TABLE 1
Bifunctional
Cure
Protein
Crosslinking agent
Time
Consistency
Fish Gelatin
130 mg/ml
40
sec
Strong gel, very
Lot 23H0307
PEG-SS2 3400 mw
elastic, slightly
Sigma
sticky
40% 0.1 M pH 10
Carb/Bicarb
Fish Gelatin
260 mg/ml
40
sec
Strong gel, very
Lot 23H0307
PEG-SS2 3400 mw
elastic, slightly
Sigma
sticky
40 % 0.1 M pH 10
Carb/Bicarb
Fish Gelatin
130 mg/ml
120
sec
Soft gel, very
Lot 23H0307
PEG-SS2 10,000 mw
sticky
Sigma
40% 0.1 M pH 10
Carb/Bicarb
Fish Gelatin
260 mg/ml
110
sec
Soft gel to
Lot 23H0307
PEG-SS2 10,000 mw
elastic,
Sigma
moderately
40% 0.1 M pH 10
sticky
Carb/Bicarb
Gelatin Bovine
130 mg/ml
40
sec
Soft gel, not
Skin Lot 53H0271
PEG-SS2 3400 mw
elastic
Sigma
40% 0.1 M pH 10
Carb/Bicarb
Gelatin Bovine
260 mg/ml
40
sec
Soft gel, not
Skin Lot 53H0271
PEG-SS2 3400 mw
elastic
Sigma
40% 0.1 M pH 10
Carb/Bicarb
Gelatin Bovine
130 mg/ml
40
sec
Soft gel, not
Skin Lot 53H0271
PEG-SS2 10,000 mw
elastic
Sigma
40% 0.1 M pH 10
Carb/Bicarb
Gelatin Bovine
260 mg/ml
120
sec
Soft gel, not
Skin Lot 53H0271
PEG-SS2 10,000 mw
elastic
Sigma
40% 0.1 M pH 10
Carb/Bicarb
Casein
130 mg/ml
40
sec
Strong gel,
pH 9.4 12.6%
PEG-SS2 3400 mw
elastic, not sticky
Carb/Bicarb
Poly-L-Lysine
130 mg/ml
20
sec
Waxy, no
50 mg/ml H2O
PEG-SS2 3400 mw
adhesive strength
300,000 mw
Carb/Bicarb
Poly-L-Lysine
260 mg/ml
15
sec
Waxy, no
50 mg/ml H2O
PEG-SS2 3400 mw
adhesive strength
300,000 mw
Carb/Bicarb
Poly-L-Lysine
130 mg/ml
10
sec
Waxy, no
50 mg/ml H2O
PEG-SS2 10,000 mw
adhesive strength
300,000 mw
Carb/Bicarb
Poly-L-Lysine
260 mg/ml
10
sec
Waxy, no
50 mg/ml H2O
PEG-SS2 10,000 mw
adhesive strength
300,000 mw
Carb/Bicarb
Chicken Egg Albumin
130 mg/ml
210
sec
soft, tacky
40% 0.08 M pH 10
PEG-SS2 3400 mw
Carb/Bicarb
Rabit Serum Albumin
130 mg/ml
20
sec
Very elastic,
(RSA) Sigma
PEG-SS2 3400 mw
good adhesive
Lot 19F9301
strength, not
40% 0.1 M pH 10
sticky
Carb/Bicarb
Human Serum Albumin
130 mg/ml
20
sec
Very elastic,
(HSA) Sigma
PEG-SS2 3400 mw
good adhesive
Lot 63H9041
strength, not
40% 0.1 M pH 10
sticky
Carb/Bicarb
HSA
130 mg/ml
20
sec
Very elastic,
Sigma
PEG-SS2 3400 mw
good adhesive
Lot 63H0941
strength, not
40% 0.1 M pH 8.44
sticky
Carb/Bacarb
HSA
260 mg/ml
10
sec
Very elastic,
Sigma
PEG-SS2 3400 mw
good adhesive
Lot 63H9041
strength, not
40% 0.1 M pH 8.44
sticky
Carb/Bicarb
HSA
130 mg/ml
30
sec
Very elastic,
Sigma
PEG-SS2 10,000 mw
slight adhesive
Lot 63H9041
strength, very
40% 0.1 M pH 8.44
sticky
Carb/Bicarb
HSA
260 mg/ml
25
sec
Very elastic,
Sigma
PEG-SS2 10,000 mw
slight adhesive
Lot 63H9041
strength, very
40% 0.1 M pH 8.44
sticky
Carb/Bicarb
HSA
130 mg/ml
20
sec
Turned brown
Baxter Healthcare
PEG-dimaleimidyl
upon curing,
Corp.
succinate
hard gel, not
Lot 2837A238AA
Example 4
sticky
Carb/Bicarb
HSA
130 mg/ml
10
sec
Turned red upon
Baxter
PEG-diphthalimidyl
curing, hard gel,
Lot 2837A238AA
succinate
not sticky
Carb/Bicarb
Example 5
HSA
130 mg/ml
8
sec
Hard gel, not
Baxter
PEG-dicarboxymethyl
sticky, no color
Lot 2837A238AA
disuccinimidyl
change
Carb/Bicarb
Example 2
HSA
130 mg/ml
40
sec
Hard gel, not
Baxter
PEG-dioliglycolide
sticky, no color
Lot 2837A238AA
disuccinimidyl succinate
change
Carb/Bicarb
Example 3
HSA
130 mg/ml
30
sec
Hard gel, not
Baxter
PEG-disuccinimidyl
sticky, no color
Lot 2837A238AA
propionate
change
Carb/Bicarb
PEG(SPA)2
HSA
260 mg/ml
40
sec
Hard gel, not
Baxter
PEG-disuccinimidyl
sticky, no color
Lot 2837A238AA
propionate
change
Carb/Bicarb
PEG(SPA)2
HSA
130 mg/ml
48
hrs
Hard gel, not
Baxter
PEG-dioxycarbonyl
(cure)
sticky, no color
Lot 2837A238AA
imidazole
change
Carb/Bicarb
PEG(CDI)2
HSA
130 mg/ml
140
sec
Hard gel, not
Baxter
PEG-dinitrophenyl
sticky, changed
Lot 2837A238AA
carbonate
to bright yellow
Carb/Bicarb
PEG(NPC)2
color
HSA
260 mg/ml
140
sec
Hard gel, not
Baxter
PEG-dinitrophenyl
sticky, changed
Lot 2837A238AA
carbonate
to bright yellow
Carb/Bicarb
PEG(NPC)2
color
HSA
130 mg/ml
8
hrs
Hard gel, not
Baxter
PEG-ditresylate
(viscous)
sticky, no color
Lot 2837A238AA
PEG(tres)2
24
hrs
change
Carb/Bicarb
(cure)
HSA
130 mg/ml
72
hrs
Hard gel, not
Baxter
PEG-diglycidyl ether
(cure)
sticky, no color
Lot 2837A238AA
PEG(epox)2
change
Carb/Bicarb
HSA
130 mg/ml
no cure
Liquid
Baxter
PEG-dialdehyde
Lot 2837A238AA
PEG(ald)2
Carb/Bicarb
mw = weight average molecular weight
Effect of Buffer and pH
Two component adhesives were prepared according to the process described in Example 6 except that the pH of the buffer in the protein solution was changed as listed in Table 2. The data indicate that a preferred pH range is about 8.44-10.0.
TABLE 2
Crosslinking
agent
Cure
Protein
PEG-SS2
Time
Consistency
HSA
130 mg/ml
10
min
Initially softer
Baxter
3400 mw
adhesive, hardness
Lot 2837A238AA
with aging
40% 0.1 M pH 7.4
Carb/Bicarb
HSA
130 mg/ml
20
sec
Very elastic, good
Sigma
3400 mw
adhesive strength,
Lot 63H9041
not sticky
40% 0.1 M pH 8.44
Carb/Bicarb
HSA
130 mg/ml
10
sec
Hard gel, no sticky
Sigma
3400 mw
Lot 63H9041
40% 0.15 M pH 9.07
Carb/Bicarb
HSA
130 mg/ml
5
sec
Hard gel, no sticky
Sigma
3400 mw
Lot 63H9041
40% 0.2 M pH 9.52
Carb/Bicarb
HSA
260 mg/ml
5
sec
Hard gel, no sticky
Sigma
3400 mw
Lot 63H9041
40% 0.2 M pH 9.52
Carb/Bicarb
HSA
130 mg/ml
7
sec
Elastic to hard gel,
Sigma
10,000 mw
slightly sticky
Lot 63H9041
40% 0.2 M pH 9.52
Carb/Bicarb
HSA
260 mg/ml
7
sec
Elastic to hard gel,
Sigma
10,000 mw
slightly sticky
Lot 63H9041
40% 0.2 M pH 9.52
Carb/Bicarb
HSA
130 mg/ml
25
sec
Very elastic, not
Baxter
3400 mw
sticky
Lot 2837A238AA
40% 0.1 M pH 10
Carb/Bicarb
HSA
130 mg/ml
25
sec
Very elastic, not
Sigma
3400 mw
sticky
Lot 63H9041
40% 0.1 M pH 10
Carb/Bicarb
mw = weight average molecular weight
Effect of Crosslinking Agent on Adhesive Strength
A 30% HSA (Human Serum Albumin) solution from Sigma Chemical Co. and a 25% HSA solution from Baxter Healthcare, Inc. were dialyzed against 0.1M carbonate/bicarbonate pH 10 buffer at 4° C. overnight and concentrated to about 40% by ultra-filtration through a 50,000 molecular weight cut-off cellulose ester disc membrane (Spectrum Medical Industries, Inc.) in a pressure filtration cell under nitrogen at 60 psig. The final concentration was calculated based on the volume of collected filtrate. The maximum concentration obtained under these conditions during overnight ultra-filtration was typically 42-45%. The RSA (Rabbit Serum Albumin) from Sigma and RSA crystallized protein from ICN Biomedical, Inc. were dissolved in 0.1M pH 10 carbonate/bicarbonate buffer and concentrated to 40% by the same method used for HSA.
Various concentrations of PEG-SS2 (3,400 mw and 10,000 mw) were prepared in deionized water. The albumins and crosslinking agent solutions were delivered in equal volume using a 1 ml dual syringe. The syringe tips were fitted with a Y connector which connected to a specially machined TEFLQN adaptor inserted into a 1.8 in.×0.187 in. (4.57 cm×0.475 cm) dia. spiral mixer nozzle (TAH Industries, Inc., Robbinsville, N.J., part no. 150-312). The adhesive mixture was injected through the mixer directly onto the test substrate for adhesion testing.
Freshly excised guinea pig skin was cut into strips and a polystyrene window with an opening of 0.5×1.0 inches (1.27 cm×2.54 cm) was placed on one end of the strip to contain the glue in a specific region. Upon filling the window with glue it was covered with another strip of guinea pig skin. A 500 g steel weight was placed on top of this assembly for about one minute. The sample was peeled apart in the jaws of a computer controlled mechanical testing machine (880 Material Test System, MTS System, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.) set at a strain rate of 0.8 in./min. (2 cm/min.) with a gage length of 1 in. (2.54 cm) and a 5 lbs. (2.27 kg) load cell. Peel force was recorded after the initiation of adhesive failure as the constant force require to continue peeling as shown in FIG. 1. Four replicates were performed for each test condition. The results of this test are listed in FIG. 2.
Measurement of Adhesive Sealant Burst Strength
A pressurization assembly illustrated in
Two types of membranes were used, either a collagen membrane or a freshly excised porcine pericardium sample. The porcine pericardium sample was either used immediately upon harvest or after storage in a moisture-proof container at 4° C. for no longer than 24 hours. Under these conditions there was no discernible difference in sealant performance based on storage time of that tissue.
The pressurization sequence was initiated by injecting air into the pressure inlet at a fixed rate of one cubic centimeter per second using a syringe pump (Sage Instruments Model 351, Orion Research, Inc.). The pressure transducer was connected to a digital strain gauge meter (Omega Model DP205-S, Omega Engineering, Inc.) programmed to read pressure (ram mercury) and to display the peak pressure value at the time of adhesive sealant rupture. Replicate tests gave reproducible peak pressure values and the standard deviation was reported in each case.
Pressure tests were performed with an adhesive composition of 40% HSA (or RSA) in 0.08M carbonate/bicarbonate buffer at different pH values with 3,400 m. wt. PEG-SS2 (130 mg/ml) on collagen and pericardium membranes. The results listed in Table 3 demonstrate excellent sealant performance with typical peak pressure values of about 130 mm Hg.
In addition, the peak pressure for the above sealants after soaking in saline solution was measured. The test was performed as described above except that the surface of the sealant coated membrane was flooded with saline for up to a time period of 90 minutes before pressurization. Although the sealant hydrogel swelled to about double in thickness, substantial retention of sealant performance was retained.
Table 4 shows the data obtained by testing a variety of proteins including fish skin gelatin, chicken egg albumin, and fibrinogen. Fibrinogen mixed with thrombin (“fibrin glue”, BERIPLAST-P sealant, Behringwerke, Marburg, Germany) was also used as a control sealant material. None of these materials performed as well as the serum albumin examples. The main disadvantage was the cure and aging time required to achieve significant strength. In particular, chicken egg albumin required twenty-five minutes of post cure aging to achieve the same burst strength obtained from serum albumin aged for less than five minutes.
The same process was repeated for additional 25% HSA solutions by dialyzing against 0.08M carbonate/bicarbonate buffers at pH 9 and pH 8. A pH 7 solution of HSA was obtained by concentration of the original 25% HSA solution to 40% by ultrafiltration. The crosslinking agent solution PEG-SS2 (3400 mw) was 130 mg dissolved in one ml deionized water. The albumin and crosslinking agent solutions were delivered in equal volume using a one ml dual syringe as in Example 8. The pressure tests were performed as above using collagen membrane except that the sealant hydrogel was aged before testing. The results are also listed in Table 4. These data demonstrate that optimal pressure test values are achieved faster with increasing pH of the albumin solution. Moreover, the resultant cured sealant obtained after complete curing has taken place is unexpectedly higher with higher pH of the albumin solution.
TABLE 3
Burst
Adhesive
Pressure
Tissue
Tissue Opening
Composition
(mm Hg)
Collagen
4.56 mm dia, hole
HSA:PEG-SS2
150
Collagen
5 mm slit
HSA:PEG-SS2
112
Collagen
4.56 mm dia, hole
RSA:PEG-SS2
130
Collagen
5 mm slit
RSA:PEG-SS2
125
Porcine
4.56 mm dia, hole
HSA:PEG-SS2
155
Pericardium
Porcine
5 mm slit
HSA:PEG-SS2
130
Pericardium
Porcine
4.56 mm dia, hole
RSA:PEG-SS2
125
Pericardium
Porcine
5 mm slit
RSA:PEG-SS2
130
Pericardium
TABLE 4
Pressure Test of Different Proteins Using Collagen and Pericardium
HSA: 40% 0.08 M Carb/Bicarb Buffer in Saline Lot #287a328AA
RSA: 40% 0.08 M Carb/Bicarb Buffer in Saline Lot #82-451-0050 INC
PEG-SS2: 3400 mw lot #103128-110 (130 mg/ml)
Defect: 4.5 mm hole
Air Flow Rate: 1 cc/s
Pressure
(mm Hg)
Protein
Crosslinker
Membrane
Ave
Stdev
Comments
HSA pH 10
PEG-SS2
Collagen
149
9
No bubbles
Pericardium
154
4
5 min after curing
Pericardium
196
5
10 min after curing
HSA pH 10
PEG-SS2
Collagen
144
5 min after curing
155
10 min after curing
162
20 min after curing
HSA pH 9
PEG-SS2
Collagen
108
5 min after curing
114
10 min after curing
116
20 min after curing
HSA pH 8
PEG-SS2
Collagen
36
5 min after curing
78
10 min after curing
90
20 min after curing
HSA pH 7
PEG-SS2
Collagen
30
10 min after curing
52
20 min after curing
RSA pH 10
PEG-SS2
Collagen
134
5
No bubbles
Pericardium
126
10
5 min after curing
Pericardium
194
9
10 min after curing
Fish Gelatin pH 10
PEG-SS2
Collagen
34
2
10 min after curing
40%
(Sigma)
Chicken Egg
PEG-SS2
Collagen
14
3
10 min after curing
Albumin pH 10
151
3
45 min after curing
40%
(Sigma)
Fibrin Glue
Pericardium
8
2
5 min after curing
(BERIPLAST-P)
with saline, glue
Used according to
slid off easily
mfg. instructions
39
2
5 min after curing
without saline
leaked underneath
Bovine Fobrinogen
PEG-SS2
Collagen
8
2
5 min after curing
pH 10
8
2
60 min after curing
15%
curing, glue slid
(Sigma)
off easily
Use of a Two Component Adhesive Sealant in General and Thoracic Surgery
An anesthetized pig was used as an experimental model for thoracic surgical complications such as staple line leaks during lung and bronchus resections, bronchopleural fistulas, and other conditions resulting in pneumothorax.
The two component adhesive included Part A, a 40% HSA prepared by dialysis of commercially available HSA (25% Solution, BUMINATE 25%, Baxter Healthcare Corp., Hyland Division, Glendale, Calif.) against 0.08M pH 10 carbonate/bicarbonate buffer followed by concentration to 40% by ultrafiltration at 50 psi using a 50,000 molecular weight cut-off cellulose ester disc membrane and Part B, a 130 mg/ml solution of 3,400 m.wt. PEG-SS2 dissolved in sterile distilled water no more than 30 minutes prior to use. The PEG-SS2 was synthesized and purified as described in Example 1.
A stab wound was made on the lung of an anesthetized pig with a scalpel which resulted in significant air leakage during inspiration as evidenced by bubbling of air through irrigation fluid administered to the site. The wound was blotted with gauze to remove blood and fluid. The respirator was turned off and the adhesive was applied as a sealant using a dual syringe (Behring PANTAJECT syringe, Behringwerke, Marburg, Germany) equipped with a spiral mixing tip. After a 20 second cure time ventilation was restored and the lung was again covered with irrigation fluid. No air leaks were observed.
A functional end-to-end anastomosis in pig intestine was conducted using a standard stapling procedure. The adhesive material described above was applied to the staple lines. This resulted in a clear, adherent hydrogel coating which appeared to seal the anastomotic line.
Under these conditions it was observed that anastomotic lines coated with the sealant were air tight whereas anastomotic lines not sealed were not air tight.
Use of Two Component Adhesive to Prevent Post-Surgical Adhesions
The tissue sealant hydrogel tested was a two part liquid system. Part A was a sterile 40% (w/v) solution of human serum albumin in isotonic pH 10 carbonate buffer (0.1M). Part B was a 400 mg/ml solution of 10,000 molecular weight PEG-SS2 (polyethylene glycol disuccinimidyl succinate) in sterile distilled water prepared just prior to use. Solutions A and B were mixed in equal volumes with a dual syringe system connected to a static mixing head (Tab Industries, Inc.).
Post-surgical adhesion prevention evaluation of this sealant formulation was initiated in a series of ten female rabbits. A 2×2 cm area of the abdominal wall was excised down to the fascia on each side of the abdominal cavity exposed by a midline laparotomy incision. The uterine horns were injured by scraping 20 times with a no. 10 scalpel blade. Each animal served as its own control by randomly applying test material to only one of the abdominal wall injuries. The uterine horns were then attached with two stitches to the abdominal wall within a few millimeters of the edge of the wound closest to the laparotomy incision.
Two weeks after surgery the rabbits were examined in order to evaluate and score the extent, type, and tenacity of adhesions present on the abdominal wall injury sites. These results are shown in Table 5. The rating system used to obtain these scores is shown in Table 6. Although technical difficulties were encountered as noted in Table 5, the test material clearly provided an unexpected benefit in both the prevention of adhesions and a reduction in their severity without the presence of a known active ingredient.
TABLE 5
Scoring of Adhesions Formed in Material Evaluation
Characteristic
Extent
Type
Tenacity
Animal
Control
Treatment
Control
Treatment
Control
Treatment
BAM 8
2
0+
3
0+
3
0+
BAM 9
3
1
3
1
3
1
BAM
0+
1
0+
3
0+
2
10
BAM
0*
0
0*
0
0*
0
11
BAM
4
4
3
3
3
3
12
BAM
2
1
3
2
3
2
13
BAM
1*
0
3*
0
3*
0
14
BAM
1
0**
1
0**
2
0**
15
BAM
1
0*
1
0*
2
0*
16
BAM
1
0*
1
0*
2
0*
17
Average
1.5
0.7
1.8
0.9
2.1
0.8
*Uterine horn tacked to abdominal wall with only one suture
**Uterine horn no longer sutured to abdominal wall
+Fascia removed with peritoneum and muscle layers
TABLE 6
Adhesion Scoring
Characteristic
Adhesion Score
Extent (% sidewall involvement)
None
0
≦25
1
≦50
2
≦75
3
>75
4
Type
None
0
Filmy, no vessles (transparent)
1
Opaque, no vessles (translucent)
2
Opaque, small vessles present grossly
3
Opaque, larger vessles present grossly
4
Tenacity
None
0
Adhesions essentially fell apart
1
Adhesion lysed with transaction
2
Adhesion required sharp dissection for lysis
3
Scholz, Matthew T., Truong, Myhanh T., Barrows, Thomas H., Lewis, Terry W.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10064973, | Jan 18 2013 | National Institute for Materials Science | Tissue adhesive and method for producing same |
10300223, | Jun 25 2014 | Neomend, Inc. | Pleural air leak test system |
10980913, | Mar 05 2018 | Cilag GmbH International | Sealant foam compositions for lung applications |
11571493, | Mar 19 2012 | Neomend, Inc | Co-precipitation method |
11739166, | Jul 02 2020 | DAVOL INC | Reactive polysaccharide-based hemostatic agent |
7351249, | Nov 06 1998 | Neomend, Inc | Systems, methods, and compositions for achieving closure of suture sites |
7727547, | Apr 04 2000 | Tissuemed Limited | Tissue-adhesive formulations |
7834065, | Jan 31 2006 | BMG Incorporated | Medical-use two part reactive adhesive and medical-use resin having self-degradation property |
8133336, | Feb 03 2006 | Tissuemed Limited | Tissue-adhesive materials |
8133504, | Aug 03 2004 | Tissuemed Limited | Tissue-adhesive materials |
8409249, | Nov 06 1998 | Neomend, Inc. | Systems, methods, and compositions for achieving closure of suture sites |
9115289, | Feb 06 2009 | DSM IP ASSETS B V | Multibranched bioadhesive compounds and synthetic methods therefor |
9254348, | Dec 30 2011 | SAMYANG HOLDINGS CORPORATION | In situ crosslinking hydrogel comprising γ-polyglutamic acid and method for producing the same |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2485512, | |||
2541804, | |||
2688610, | |||
2712672, | |||
2847713, | |||
2897547, | |||
3271496, | |||
4101380, | Jun 12 1975 | Research Products Rehovot Ltd. | Process for the cross-linking of proteins |
4163097, | Jun 18 1975 | ROHNER AG | Crosslinkable polymeric compounds |
4323486, | Nov 12 1979 | Teijin Limited | Albumin-fixed resin, production thereof, and therapeutical use thereof |
4339295, | Dec 20 1978 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the | Hydrogel adhesives and sandwiches or laminates using microwave energy |
4356819, | Mar 21 1979 | ADVANCE TAPES U K LIMITED, | Article of manufacture having adhesive properties |
4377572, | Feb 15 1979 | Immuno Aktiengesellschaft fur chemisch-medizinische Produkte | Tissue adhesive |
4414976, | Feb 15 1979 | Immuno Aktiengesellschaft fur chemischmedizinische Produkte | Tissue adhesive |
4416814, | Oct 18 1978 | ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL ESSILOR | Protein polymer hydrogels |
4439322, | Jul 02 1980 | Toray Industries, Inc. | Polymethyl methacrylate membrane |
4606337, | Apr 19 1982 | SERAPHARM GMBH & CO KG | Resorptive sheet material for closing and healing wounds and method of making the same |
4609546, | Jun 24 1982 | Japan Chemical Research Co., Ltd. | Long-acting composition |
4670417, | Jun 19 1985 | Ajinomoto Co., Inc. | Hemoglobin combined with a poly(alkylene oxide) |
4692462, | Mar 18 1985 | Menley & James Laboratories, Ltd. | Compositions and method of controlling transdermal penetration of topical and systemic agents |
4814120, | Feb 21 1984 | BASF Beauty Care Solutions France SAS | Process for the preparation of collagen tubes |
4818542, | Nov 14 1983 | The University of Kentucky Research Foundation | Porous microspheres for drug delivery and methods for making same |
4839345, | Mar 09 1985 | Nippon Oil and Fats Co., Ltd. | Hydrated adhesive gel and method for preparing the same |
4851513, | Sep 06 1985 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Viscoelastic collagen solution for opthalmic use and method of preparation |
4897268, | Aug 03 1987 | Southern Research Institute | Drug delivery system and method of making the same |
4898734, | Feb 29 1988 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Polymer composite for controlled release or membrane formation |
4909251, | May 31 1988 | Immuno Aktiengesellschaft fur chemisch-medizinische Produkte | Tissue adhesive |
4952403, | Jun 19 1987 | President and Fellows of Harvard College | Implants for the promotion of healing of meniscal tissue |
4997443, | Aug 26 1985 | SOMATIX THERAPY CORPORATION, A CORP OF DE | Transplantable artificial tissue and process |
5017556, | Nov 04 1986 | Genentech, Inc. | Treatment of bleeding disorders using lipid-free tissue factor protein |
5081295, | Mar 04 1988 | XOMA Corporation | Activated polyers and conjugates thereof |
5089261, | Jan 23 1989 | Chiron Corporation | Preparation of a polymer/interleukin-2 conjugate |
5091176, | Nov 02 1988 | Hampshire Chemical Corp | Polymer-modified peptide drugs having enhanced biological and pharmacological activities |
5112615, | Aug 03 1988 | BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER, INC , THE | Soluble hirudin conjugates |
5118794, | Apr 14 1988 | NOVOZYMES DELTA LIMITED | Process for stabilizing human albumin solutions and the solution obtained |
5122614, | Apr 19 1989 | ENZON, INC , A CORP OF NJ | Active carbonates of polyalkylene oxides for modification of polypeptides |
5149543, | Oct 05 1990 | MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, A CORP OF MA | Ionically cross-linked polymeric microcapsules |
5153174, | Oct 30 1989 | UNION CARBIDE CHEMICALS AND PLASTICS COMPANY INC | Polymer mixtures useful in skin care |
5162430, | Nov 21 1988 | AngioDevice International GmbH | Collagen-polymer conjugates |
5169627, | Oct 28 1991 | Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York | Oral pharmaceutical composition containing a polyethylene glycol-immunoglobulin G conjugate for reconstitution of secretory immunity and method of reconstituting secretory immunity |
5209776, | Jul 27 1990 | TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF YORK, THE | Tissue bonding and sealing composition and method of using the same |
5214131, | May 06 1988 | Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Company, Limited | Polyethylene glycol derivatives, modified peptides and production thereof |
5219564, | Jul 06 1990 | ENZON, INC | Poly(alkylene oxide) amino acid copolymers and drug carriers and charged copolymers based thereon |
5232984, | Oct 15 1990 | The Board of the Regents the University of Texas | Biocompatible microcapsules |
5235041, | Dec 28 1990 | Protein Polymer Technologies, Inc. | Purification of structurally ordered recombinant protein polymers |
5243038, | Nov 04 1986 | PROTEIN POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Construction of synthetic DNA and its use in large polypeptide synthesis |
5264214, | Nov 21 1988 | AngioDevice International GmbH | Composition for bone repair |
5278063, | Sep 28 1989 | BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM, | Chemical modification of promote animal cell adhesion on surfaces |
5281698, | Jul 23 1991 | Chiron Corporation | Preparation of an activated polymer ester for protein conjugation |
5286637, | Aug 07 1989 | Debio Recherche Pharmaceutique SA | Biologically active drug polymer derivatives and method for preparing same |
5292362, | Jul 27 1990 | TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF YORK, THE | Tissue bonding and sealing composition and method of using the same |
5292802, | Nov 21 1988 | ANGIOTECH PHARMACEUTICALS US , INC | Collagen-polymer tubes for use in vascular surgery |
5306500, | Nov 21 1988 | ANGIOTECH PHARMACEUTICALS US , INC | Method of augmenting tissue with collagen-polymer conjugates |
5321095, | Feb 02 1993 | ENZON, INC | Azlactone activated polyalkylene oxides |
5324775, | Nov 21 1988 | AngioDevice International GmbH | Biologically inert, biocompatible-polymer conjugates |
5324844, | Apr 19 1989 | Enzon, Inc. | Active carbonates of polyalkylene oxides for modification of polypeptides |
5328955, | Nov 21 1988 | ANGIOTECH PHARMACEUTICALS US , INC | Collagen-polymer conjugates |
5330911, | Sep 28 1989 | Board of Regents, The University of Texas System | Surfaces having desirable cell adhesive effects |
5334191, | May 21 1992 | POPPAS, DIX P ; SCHLOSSBERG, STEVEN M ; CHOMA, THEODORE J ; KLIOZE, SCOTT D | Laser tissue welding control system |
5349001, | Jan 19 1993 | ENZON, INC | Cyclic imide thione activated polyalkylene oxides |
5349052, | Oct 20 1988 | PolyMASC Pharmaceuticals plc | Process for fractionating polyethylene glycol (PEG)-protein adducts and an adduct for PEG and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor |
5376375, | Nov 21 1988 | ANGIOTECH PHARMACEUTICALS US , INC | Method of augmenting tissue using collagen-polymer conjugates |
5380536, | Oct 15 1990 | The Board of Regents, The University of Texas System | Biocompatible microcapsules |
5385606, | Jul 06 1992 | HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC, AS SUCCESSOR AGENT | Adhesive composition and method |
5405877, | Jan 19 1993 | Enzon, Inc. | Cyclic imide thione activated polyalkylene oxides |
5409481, | May 21 1992 | Laserscope | Laser tissue welding control system |
5410016, | Oct 15 1990 | BOARD OF REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM, THE | Photopolymerizable biodegradable hydrogels as tissue contacting materials and controlled-release carriers |
5413791, | Nov 21 1988 | ANGIOTECH PHARMACEUTICALS US , INC | Collagen-polymer conjugates |
5417982, | Feb 17 1994 | CENTRUM BIOTECHNOLOGIES INC | Controlled release of drugs or hormones in biodegradable polymer microspheres |
5444154, | Dec 26 1991 | SILTECH CORP | Crosslinked protein polymers as humectants |
5446091, | Nov 21 1988 | ANGIOTECH PHARMACEUTICALS US , INC | Collagen-polymer conjugates containing an ether linkage |
5455027, | Jul 06 1990 | Enzon, Inc. | Poly(alkylene oxide) amino acid copolymers and drug carriers and charged copolymers based thereon |
5462990, | Aug 05 1991 | Board of Regents, The University of Texas System | Multifunctional organic polymers |
5468505, | Feb 28 1992 | Board of Regents, The University of Texas System | Local delivery of fibrinolysis enhancing agents |
5475052, | Nov 21 1988 | ANGIOTECH PHARMACEUTICALS US , INC | Collagen-synthetic polymer matrices prepared using a multiple step reaction |
5476653, | Jun 17 1992 | Amgen Inc. | Polyoxymethylene-oxyethylene copolymers in conjuction with biomolecules |
5482996, | Dec 08 1993 | University of Pittsburgh | Protein-containing polymers and a method of synthesis of protein-containing polymers in organic solvents |
5490984, | Feb 28 1992 | ANGIOTECH BIOMATERIALS CORPORATION | Use of injectable biomaterials for the repair and augmentation of the anal sphincters |
5496712, | Nov 06 1990 | SPINE WAVE, INC | High molecular weight collagen-like protein polymers |
5496872, | Jul 21 1993 | Imedex | Adhesive compositions for surgical use |
5508060, | Feb 11 1993 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Method of polymer impregnation |
5514379, | Aug 07 1992 | The General Hospital Corporation; General Hospital Corporation, The | Hydrogel compositions and methods of use |
5527856, | Nov 21 1988 | ANGIOTECH PHARMACEUTICALS US , INC | Method of preparing crosslinked biomaterial compositions for use in tissue augmentation |
5529914, | Aug 05 1991 | BOARD OF REGENTS, THE | Gels for encapsulation of biological materials |
5543441, | Nov 21 1988 | ANGIOTECH PHARMACEUTICALS US , INC | Implants coated with collagen-polymer conjugates |
5550187, | Nov 21 1988 | ANGIOTECH PHARMACEUTICALS US , INC | Method of preparing crosslinked biomaterial compositions for use in tissue augmentation |
5552452, | Mar 15 1993 | Arch Development Corp | Organic tissue glue for closure of wounds |
5565519, | Nov 21 1988 | AngioDevice International GmbH | Clear, chemically modified collagen-synthetic polymer conjugates for ophthalmic applications |
5567422, | Feb 02 1993 | Enzon, Inc. | Azlactone activated polyalkylene oxides conjugated to biologically active nucleophiles |
5567435, | Feb 28 1992 | Board of Regents, The University of Texas System | Photopolymerizable biodegradable hydrogels as tissue contacting materials and controlled-release carriers |
5567440, | Oct 15 1990 | Board of Regents, The University of Texas System | Methods for modifying cell contact with a surface |
5573934, | Apr 20 1992 | BOARD OF REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM, THE | Gels for encapsulation of biological materials |
5580923, | Mar 14 1995 | ANGIOTECH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC | Anti-adhesion films and compositions for medical use |
5605938, | May 31 1991 | TRIAD, LLC | Methods and compositions for inhibition of cell invasion and fibrosis using dextran sulfate |
5612050, | Mar 23 1993 | Focal, Inc | Apparatus and method for local application of polymeric material to tissue |
5614587, | Nov 21 1988 | AngioDevice International GmbH | Collagen-based bioadhesive compositions |
5626863, | Feb 28 1992 | Board of Regents, The University of Texas System | Photopolymerizable biodegradable hydrogels as tissue contacting materials and controlled-release carriers |
5627233, | Oct 15 1990 | Board of Regents, The University of Texas System | Multifunctional organic polymers |
5637749, | Dec 22 1992 | Enzon, Inc. | Aryl imidate activated polyalkylene oxides |
5641483, | Jun 07 1995 | Wound healing formulations containing human plasma fibronectin | |
5643464, | Nov 21 1988 | AngioDevice International GmbH | Process for preparing a sterile, dry crosslinking agent |
5662712, | Apr 28 1993 | Focal, Inc | Apparatus for intraluminal photothermoforming |
5702715, | Oct 27 1995 | Drying Technology | Reinforced biological sealants |
5733563, | Dec 01 1993 | RBA PHARMA INC | Albumin based hydrogel |
5739208, | Nov 12 1993 | Nektar Therapeutics | Isolatable, water soluble, and hydrolytically stable active sulfones of poly(ethylene glycol) and related polymers for modification of surfaces and molecules |
5744545, | Nov 21 1988 | ANGIOTECH PHARMACEUTICALS US , INC | Biocompatible adhesive compositions |
5808096, | Apr 19 1989 | Enzon, Inc. | Process for preparing active carbonates of polyalkylene oxides for modification of polypeptides |
5834274, | Apr 20 1992 | Board of Regents, The University of Texas System | Gels for encapsulation of biological materials |
5874537, | Jan 29 1991 | C R BARD, INC | Method for sealing tissues with collagen-based sealants |
5895412, | Oct 11 1995 | Baxter International Inc; BAXTER HEALTHCARE S A | Device and method for sealing tissue |
5900461, | Nov 12 1993 | Nektar Therapeutics | Isolatable, water soluble, and hydrolytically stable active sulfones of poly(ethylene glycol) and related polymers for modification of surfaces and molecules |
5919455, | Oct 27 1993 | Enzon, Inc. | Non-antigenic branched polymer conjugates |
EP194807, | |||
EP225162, | |||
EP454373, | |||
FR2551660, | |||
GB579004, | |||
JP4146218, | |||
JP6218035, | |||
JP6233855, | |||
RE38158, | Jul 27 1994 | Neomend, Inc | Adhesive sealant composition |
WO9013540, | |||
WO9202238, | |||
WO9401508, | |||
WO9403155, | |||
WO9420133, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Nov 14 2002 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Sep 09 2004 | 3M COMPANY FORMERLY MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY | 3M Innovative Properties Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 015116 | /0336 | |
Jun 21 2007 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Neomend, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023119 | /0699 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 04 2008 | M2553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Yr, Small Entity. |
Jun 12 2008 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Jun 12 2008 | LTOS: Pat Holder Claims Small Entity Status. |
Jan 15 2010 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Jan 15 2010 | RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 11 2008 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 11 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 11 2009 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 11 2011 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 11 2012 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 11 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 11 2013 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 11 2015 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 11 2016 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 11 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 11 2017 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 11 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |