A system and method for efficiently charging and discharging a capacitive load from a single voltage source. The system includes a brat switch for selectively connecting the voltage source to the load and a second switch for selectively providing a short across the load as may he common in the art. A particularly novel aspect of the invention resides in the provision of plural capacitive elements and a switching mechanism for selectively connecting each of the capacitive elements to the load whereby the load is gradually charged or discharged. In the illustrative embodiment, the switching mechanism includes a set of switches for selectively connecting each of the capacitive elements to the capacitive load and a switch control mechanism for selectively activating the switches.
|
0. 35. An apparatus for driving a capacitive load, comprising:
a voltage source; and
a switch network,
wherein the switch network is operable to electrically connect the capacitive load and the voltage source to drive the load to a first voltage level,
wherein the switch network is further operable to electrically connect the capacitive load and a capacitive storage system, and wherein when the capacitive storage system and the capacitive load are electrically connected by the switch network, the capacitive storage system is electrically isolated from the voltage source, and
wherein the switch network is further operable to cause charge to be transferred from the capacitive storage subsystem to the capacitive load and is still further operable to cause charge to be transferred from the capacitive load to the capacitive storage subsystem.
0. 58. An apparatus for driving a capacitive load, comprising:
a voltage source; and
a switch network,
wherein the switch network is operable to electrically connect the capacitive load and the voltage source to drive the load to a first voltage level,
wherein the switch network is further operable to electrically connect the capacitive load and a capacitive storage system, and wherein when the capacitive storage system and the capacitive load are electrically connected by the switch network, the capacitive storage system and the capacitive load are electrically floating, and
wherein the switch network is further operable to cause charge to be transferred from the capacitive storage subsystem to the capacitive load and is still further operable to cause charge to be transferred from the capacitive load to the capacitive storage subsystem.
0. 12. An apparatus for driving a capacitive load, comprising:
a voltage source; and
a switch network,
wherein the switch network is operable to electrically connect the capacitive load and the voltage source to drive the load to a first voltage level,
wherein the switch network is further operable to electrically connect the capacitive load and a capacitive storage system, and wherein when the capacitive storage system and the capacitive load are electrically connected by the switch network, a voltage level of the capacitive storage system tends to self stabilize to a second voltage level; and
wherein the switch network is further operable to cause charge to be transferred from the capacitive storage subsystem to the capacitive load and is still further operable to cause charge to be transferred from the capacitive load to the capacitive storage subsystem.
0. 47. An apparatus comprising:
a capacitive load;
a voltage source;
a switch network; and
a capacitive storage system,
wherein the switch network is operable to electrically connect the capacitive load and the voltage source to drive the load to a first voltage level,
wherein the switch network is further operable to electrically connect the capacitive load and the capacitive storage system, and wherein when the capacitive storage system and the capacitive load are electrically connected by the switch network, the capacitive storage system is electrically isolated from the voltage source, and
wherein the switch network is further operable to cause charge to be transferred from the capacitive storage subsystem to the capacitive load and is still further operable to cause charge to be transferred from the capacitive load to the capacitive storage subsystem.
0. 70. An apparatus comprising:
a capacitive load;
a voltage source;
a switch network; and
a capacitive storage system,
wherein the switch network is operable to electrically connect the capacitive load and the voltage source to drive the load to a first voltage level,
wherein the switch network is further operable to electrically connect the capacitive load and the capacitive storage system, and wherein when the capacitive storage system and the capacitive load are electrically connected by the switch network, the capacitive storage system and the capacitive load are electrically floating, and
wherein the switch network is further operable to cause charge to be transferred from the capacitive storage subsystem to the capacitive load and is still further operable to cause charge to be transferred from the capacitive load to the capacitive storage subsystem.
0. 24. An apparatus comprising:
a capacitive load;
a voltage source;
a switch network; and
a capacitive storage system,
wherein the switch network is operable to electrically connect the capacitive load and the voltage source to drive the load to a first voltage level,
wherein the switch network is further operable to electrically connect the capacitive load and the capacitive storage system, and wherein when the capacitive storage system and the capacitive load are electrically connected by the switch network, a voltage level of the capacitive storage system tends to self stabilize to a second voltage level, and
wherein the switch network is further operable to cause charge to be transferred from the capacitive storage subsystem to the capacitive load and is still further operable to cause charge to be transferred from the capacitive load to the capacitive storage subsystem.
0. 1. A system for efficiently charging and discharging a capacitive lad from a single voltage source of a first potential consisting of:
a first switch for selectively charging the load;
a second switch for selectively discharging the load;
plural capacitive elements; and
switch means for selectively connecting each of the capacitive elements to the capacitive load to gradually charge or discharge the capacitive load.
0. 2. The invention of
0. 3. The invention of
0. 4. The invention of
0. 5. The invention of
0. 6. The invention of
0. 7. The invention of
0. 8. The invention of
0. 9. The invention of
0. 10. The invention of
0. 11. A method for efficiently charging and discharging a capacitive load from a single voltage source including the steps of:
providing a flat switch for selectively connecting the voltage source to the load;
providing a second switch for selectively providing a short across the load;
providing plural capacitive elements;
providing plural third switches for selectively connecting each of the capacitive elements to the capacitive load; and
selectively activating the first, second and third switches to gradually charge or discharge the capacitive load.
0. 13. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 14. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 15. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 16. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 17. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 18. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 19. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 20. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 21. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 22. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 23. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 25. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 26. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 27. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 28. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 29. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 30. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 31. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 32. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 33. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 34. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 36. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 37. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 38. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 39. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 40. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 41. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 42. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 43. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 44. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 45. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 46. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 48. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 49. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 50. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 51. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 52. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 53. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 54. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 55. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 56. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 57. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 59. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 60. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 61. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 62. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 63. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 64. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 65. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 66. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 67. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 68. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 69. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 71. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 72. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 73. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 74. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 75. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 76. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 77. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 78. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 79. An apparatus as claimed in
0. 80. An apparatus as claimed in
|
In accordance with the present teachings, power dissipation is reduced by charging the capacitance of the load CL in several steps. This is illustrated in
If N steps are used, the dissipation per step is again given by the transferred charge and the average voltage drop across isle switch resistance:
Estep=QV′=(CV/N) (V/2N)=CV2/2N2 [2]
To charge the capacitance all the way to the supply voltage V, N steps are used, so the total energy dissipation is:
Again, a full charge-discharge cycle will cause twice the dissipation of the charging only. Thus, according to this simplified analysis, charging by several steps reduces the energy dissipation per charge-discharge cycle and thereby the total power dissipation, by a factor of N.
The multiple supply voltages of
Timing signals are provided by a system clock (not shown) through the latch 22. In practice, the clock rate should be at least (N+1) times the output signal rate. In the preferred embodiment, switches 0-4 are implemented with n-channel MOSFET devices. Switches 5 and 6 are implemented with p-channel devices.
The operation of the circuits of
On the trailing edge of input pulse, a discharge cycle is initiated by when the switches are momentarily closed in reverse order Thus, switch N is opened and switch N−1 is closed Then switch N−1 is opened and switch N−2 is closed and etc. On the closure of switch N−1, the associated tank capacitor will receive most of the charge on the load capacitance. Each capacitor down the line will receive a lower charge than the immediately proceeding capacitor. After switch 1 opens, switch 0 closes to complete the cycle dumping the remaining charge on the load CL to ground. Thus, over several cycles the tank capacitors will approach their steady state voltage, for example, the (N−1)th through 1st tank capacitor may have charges of say 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1 volts respectively. Than, at the beginning of the next cycle, on the closure of the first switch, the voltage on the first tank capacitor is applied to the load, then the voltage on the second capacitor is applied to the load and so on. Thus, in the example, first 1 volt is applied to the load, then 2 volts, then three volts and etc. As a result, the voltage on the load will gradually increase as shown in FIG. 5(j).
The circuits of
q=CLV/N [4]
Since the tank capacitors are much larger than the load, the tank voltages do not change significantly, so the dissipation in the switches will be the same as for the case in
The voltages of the tank capacitor bank are self-stabilizing. To appreciate this, assume that the voltage of one of the tank capacitors is slightly higher than it should be. Then, the charge delivered by this tank capacitor during the charging of the load will be somewhat larger then that given by equation [4], since the “step” from the voltage below is now slightly larger. During the discharge phase, the step from the voltage above is slightly smaller and the charge received is therefore smaller as well. Therefore, over the full cycle, a net decrease of the charge on the storage capacitor occurs, which causes a decrease in the capacitor voltage. The initial deviance is automatically counteracted.
Even if the tank capacitor voltages differ from the “correct” values, the circuit will work logically correctly, since each charging (discharging) cycle ends by connecting the load to be supply rail (ground). Voltage deviations simply bring higher dissipation. This happens during start-up, before the tank voltages have had time to converge to the even distribution between the supply voltage and ground.
The implementation coat of a driver such as that shown in
The problem of maintaining the appropriate voltages on the tank capacitors is obviated by the fact that the capacitor voltages will converge automatically to the desired voltages No additional circuitry is required. Only one supply line most be routed to the chip and the power supply need not be any more complicated than a conventional supply. In practice, the tank capacitors would be located off-chip.
For a CMOS implementation, the following design procedure may be followed to provide a driver configuration which exhibits minimal power dissipation.
Equation [3] indicates that dissipation decreases monotonically with increasing N. The number N cannot, however, be usefully made arbitrarily large because each step requires that a switch be turned on and off, which itself causes dissipation. Also, the energy used to drive each switch depends on the width of the device, which should be just enough to allow the charging to complete before the next step commences. Then, for a given total allowable charging time “T”, these is sat optimal number of steps and a set of optimal device sizes which lead to minimal total dissipation determined as follows.
Again, consider the circuit in FIG. 3 and same the gates of the switch devices we driven conventionally. The load is charged and discharged once; the energy needed to drive the gates of the switch devices is.
Allot each step one Nth of the total charging time T. Then:
T/N=mRiCL [6]
Here, m is the number of RC time constants spent waiting for each charging step to complete. From equation [6], it is evident that all the switch devices should have equal on-resistance: Ri=Rsw. Decreasing the on-resistance of device i by increasing the width means increasing the gate capacitance.
RiCi=ρi [7]
ρi is a quality measure of the switch. It varies with i, since the bulk-to-channel and gate-to-channel voltages are different for different switches. Combining equations [5], [6], and [7] yields:
Introducing {overscore (ρ)}, a weighted average of ρ, for the different switches:
If N is sufficiently large, {overscore (ρ)} is close to the unweighed average of ρ over the entire voltage range. Combining equations [3], [8] and [9] yields the following expression for the total energy dissipation:
The number N that minimizes Etot is given by:
The corresponding energy dissipation is:
It remains to select the value for m. If it is chosen too small, there will still be a significant voltage across a switch when the next switch is to close. Hence, them is an increase in the average voltage across each switch and therefore a dissipation increase (the first term in equation [10] is changed slightly). If on the other hand to is chosen unnecessarily large, time is wasted that could have been used to increase the number of steps. Thus, in general, optimization methods for the value of to vary according to the application, however, one skilled in the at will be able to select a suitable value for to using conventional teachings (e.g., a simulation program).
By using the number of stages given by equation [10], the designer coo minimize the power dissipation of the driver. The minimum is rather shallow, however, so a lower N (as would most often be dictated by practical considerations) will still give a considerable improvement over the conventional case, N=2 already gives almost 50% reduction. Once N and m have been selected, the on-resistance of each switch is given by equation [6]. The corresponding gate capacitance, and thereby the width of the device, is given by equation [7]. The values of ρ for a certain process can be found by circuit simulation or by measuring the on-resistances of test devices of known widths.
Thus, the present invention has been described herein with reference to a particular embodiment for a particular application. Those having ordinary skill in the art and access to the present teachings will recognize additional modifications applications and embodiments within the scope thereof. For example, the switches may be closed in some other sequence as may be appropriate for a given application without departing from the scope of the present invention. In addition, alternative circuit topologies for the network of tank capacitors and switches may be appropriate. The second terminal of the load may be connected to a potentially variable) voltage other than ground.
It is therefore intended by the appended claims to cover any and all such applications, modifications and embodiments within the scope of the present invention.
Accordingly,
Athas, William C., Koller, Jeffrey G., Svensson, Lars G.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10061366, | Nov 17 2015 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Schedule-based energy storage device selection |
10158148, | Feb 18 2015 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Dynamically changing internal state of a battery |
10228747, | Feb 09 2015 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Battery parameter-based power management for suppressing power spikes |
10263421, | Feb 26 2015 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Load allocation for multi-battery devices |
7414460, | Mar 31 2006 | Integrated Device Technology, Inc. | System and method for integrated circuit charge recycling |
8400382, | Jun 30 2006 | Sony Corporation | D/A converter circuit, liquid crystal driving circuit, and liquid crystal device |
9285851, | Jun 22 2012 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Optimizing battery use for known future load |
9696782, | Feb 09 2015 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Battery parameter-based power management for suppressing power spikes |
9748765, | Feb 26 2015 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Load allocation for multi-battery devices |
9793570, | Dec 04 2015 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Shared electrode battery |
9939862, | Nov 13 2015 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Latency-based energy storage device selection |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3603898, | |||
3654537, | |||
3836906, | |||
4082430, | Mar 30 1971 | BBC Aktiengesellschaft Brown, Boveri & Company, Ltd. | Driving circuit for a matrix-addressed liquid crystal display device |
4107757, | Jun 30 1977 | Senichi, Masuda | Pulse power source |
4109192, | Jun 25 1976 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Low power reactive drive circuit for capacitive loads |
4328525, | Jun 27 1980 | International Business Machines Corporation | Pulsed sine wave oscillating circuit arrangement |
4594589, | Aug 31 1981 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Method and circuit for driving electroluminescent display panels with a stepwise driving voltage |
4605999, | Mar 11 1985 | AT&T Bell Laboratories | Self-oscillating high frequency power converter |
4707692, | Nov 30 1984 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Electroluminescent display drive system |
4802739, | Jun 07 1985 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Liquid crystal display control device |
4818981, | Sep 11 1986 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Active matrix display device and method for driving the same |
4862113, | Jan 06 1988 | International Business Machines Corporation | Sinusoidal oscillator with instant start-up |
4893117, | Jul 18 1986 | Nortel Networks Limited | Liquid crystal driving systems |
4920474, | Mar 23 1989 | North American Philips Corporation | High frequency high voltage power supply with controlled output power |
5095223, | Jun 13 1990 | U.S. Philips Corporation | DC/DC voltage multiplier with selective charge/discharge |
5339236, | Mar 23 1992 | NEC Corporation | Charge pump circuit for intermediate voltage between power supply voltage and its double voltage |
5400028, | Oct 30 1992 | Innolux Corporation | Charge summing digital to analog converter |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 10 2001 | University of Southern California | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 18 2007 | STOL: Pat Hldr no Longer Claims Small Ent Stat |
Jun 25 2007 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 25 2007 | M1556: 11.5 yr surcharge- late pmt w/in 6 mo, Large Entity. |
Jun 29 2007 | R2553: Refund - Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Yr, Small Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 13 2008 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 13 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 13 2009 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 13 2011 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 13 2012 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 13 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 13 2013 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 13 2015 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 13 2016 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 13 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 13 2017 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 13 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |