The present invention relates to an airbag cushion which simultaneously exhibits a low amount of seam usage (in order to attach at least two fabric panels or portions of a single panel together) as well as a very low amount of fabric utilized to produce the target airbag cushion, both in correlation to an overall high amount of available inflation airspace within the cushion itself. These two separate, but correlated factors, one based on an effective seam usage index are now combined for the first time in what is defined as an effective seam usage index (being the quotient of the length of overall seams on the cushions and the available inflation airspace volume) and the other based on an effective fabric usage index (being the quotient of the amount of fabric utilized in the construciton of the airbag cushion and the available inflation airspace volume). The inventive airbag cushion must possess an effective seam usage factor of at most 0.11 and an effective fabric usage factor of at most 0.0330. A cushion exhibiting such low seam usage and fabric usage factors and also comprising an integrated looped pocket for the disposition of an inflator can is also provided as well as an overall vehicle restraint system comprising the inventive airbag cushion.
|
1. An airbag cushion comprising at least one seam in order to connect either (a) at least two fabric panels or (b) at least two portions of a single fabric panel, wherein said airbag cushion possesses an effective seam usage factor of less than 0.11 0.0800 and possesses an effective fabric usage factor of less than about 0.0330.
2. The airbag cushion of
4. The airbag cushion of
6. The airbag cushion of
8. The airbag cushion of
10. The airbag cushion of
13. The airbag cushion of
0. 15. The airbag cushion of
0. 16. A vehicle restraint system comprising the airbag cushion of
17. The airbag cushion of claim 3 1 wherein said airbag cushion possesses an effective fabric usage factor of less than about 0.07.
19. The airbag cushion of claim 15 6 wherein said airbag cushion possesses an effective fabric usage factor of less than about 0.028.
|
The present invention relates to an airbag cushion which simultaneously exhibits a low amount of seam usage (in order to attach at least two fabric panels or portions of a single panel together) as well as a very low amount of fabric utilized to produce the target airbag cushion, both in correlation to an overall high amount of available inflation airspace within the cushion itself. These two separate, but correlated factors, are now combined for the first time in what is defined as an effective seam usage index (being the quotient of the length of overall seams on the cushions and the available inflation airspace volume) and the other based on an effective fabric usage index (being the quotient of the amount of fabric utilized in the construciton of the airbag cushion and the available inflation airspace volume). The inventive airbag cushion must possess an effective seam usage factor of at most 0.11 and an effective fabric usage factor of at most 0.0330. A cushion exhibiting such low seam usage and fabric usage factors and also comprising an integrated looped pocket for the disposition of an inflator can is also provided as well as an overall vehicle restraint system comprising the inventive airbag cushion.
All U.S. patent cited herein are hereby filly incorporated by reference.
Inflatable protective cushions used in passenger vehicles are a component of relatively complex passive restraint systems. The main elements of these systems are: an impact sensing system, an ignition system, a propellant material, an attachment device, a system enclosure, and an inflatable protective cushion. Upon sensing an impact, the propellant is ignited causing an explosive release of gases filing the cushion to a deployed state which can absorb the impact of the forward movement of a body and dissipate its energy by means of rapid venting of the gas. The entire sequence of events occurs within about 30 milliseconds. In the undeployed state, the cushion is stored in or near the steering column, the dashboard, in a door, or in the back of a front seat placing the cushion in close proximity to the person or object it is to protect.
Inflatable cushion systems commonly referred to as air bag systems have been used in the past to protect both the operator of the vehicle and passengers. Systems for the protection of the vehicle operator have typically been mounted in the steering column of the vehicle and have utilized cushion constructions directly deployable towards the driver. These driver-side cushions are typically of a relatively simple configuration in that they function over a fairly small well-defined area between the driver and the steering column. One such configuration is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,533,755 to Nelsen et al., issued Jul. 9, 1996, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Inflatable cushions for use in the protection of passengers against frontal or side impacts must generally have a more complex configuration since the position of a vehicle passenger may not be well defined and greater distance may exist between the passenger and the surface of the vehicle against which that passenger might be thrown in the event of a collision. Prior cushions for use in such, environments are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,520,416 to Bishop, issued May 28, 1996; U.S. Pat. No. 5,454,594 to Krickl issued Oct. 3, 1995; U.S. Pat. No. 5,423,273 to Hawthorn et al. issued Jun. 13, 1995; U.S. Pat. No. 5,316,337 to Yamaji et al. issued May 31, 1994; U.S. Pat. No. 5,310,216 to Wehner et al. issued May 10, 1994; U.S. Pat. No. 5,090,729 to Watanabe issued Feb. 25, 1992; U.S. Pat. No. 5,087,071 to Wallner et al. issued Feb. 11, 1992; U.S. Pat. No. 4,944,529 to Backhaus issued Jul. 31, 1990; and U.S. Pat. No. 3,792,873 to Buchner et al. issued Feb. 19, 1974, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The majority of commercially used restraint cushions are formed of woven fabric materials utilizing multifilament synthetic yarns of materials such as polyester, nylon 6 or nylon 6,6 polymers. Representative fabrics for such use are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,921,735 to Bloch issued May 1, 1990; U.S. Pat. No. 5,093,163 to Krummheuer et al. issued Mar. 3, 1992; U.S. Pat. No. 5,110,666 to Menzel et al. issued May 5, 1992; U.S. Pat. No. 5,236,775 to Swoboda et al. Aug. 17, 1993; U.S. Pat. No. 5,277,230 to Sollars, Jr. issued Jan. 11, 1994; U.S. Pat. No. 5,356,680 to Krummheuer et al. Oct. 18, 1994; U.S. Pat. No. 5,477,890 to Krummheuer et al. issued Dec. 26, 1995; U.S. Pat. No. 5,508,073 to Krummheuer et al., issued Apr. 16, 1996; U.S. Pat. No. 5,503,197 to Bower et al. issued Apr. 2, 1996 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,704,402 to Bowen et al. issued Jan. 6, 1998, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
As will be appreciated, the permeability of the cushion structure is an important factor in determining the rate of inflation and subsequent rapid deflation following the impact event. In order to control the overall permeability of the cushion, it may be desirable to use differing materials in different regions of the cushion. Thus, the use of several fabric panels in construction of the cushion may prove to be a useful design feature. The use of multiple fabric panels in the cushion structure also permits the development of relatively complex three dimensional geometries which may be of benefit in the formation of cushions for passenger side applications wherein a full bodied cushion is desired. While the use of multiple fabric panels provides several advantages in terms of permeability manipulation and geometric design, the use of multiple fabric panels for use in passenger side restraint cushions has historically required the assembly of panels having multiple different geometries involving multiple curved seams.
As will be appreciated, an important consideration in cutting panel structures from a base material is the ability to maximize the number of panels which can be cut from a fixed area through close-packed nesting of the panels. It has been found that minimizing the number of different geometries making up panels in the cushion and using geometries with substantially straight line perimeter configurations generally permits an enhanced number of panels to be cut from the base material. The use of panels having generally straight line profiles has the added benefit of permitting the panels to be attached to one another using substantially straight seams or be substantially formed during the weaving process using a jacquard or dobby loom. The use of panels having generally straight line profiles has the added benefit of permitting the panels to be attached to one another using substantially straight seams or be substantially formed during the weaving process using a jacquard or dobby loom. For the purposes of this invention, the term “seam” is to be understood as any point of attachment between different fabric panels or different portions of the same fabric panel. Thus, a seam may be sewn (such as with thread), welded (such as by ultrasonic stitching), woven (such as on a jacquard or dobby loom, as merely examples), and the like. The key issue regarding seam length wihtin this invention pertains to the ability to form a high available inflation airspace volume cushion with the lowest amount of labor needed. Since sewing, welding, etc., procedures to connect panels or portions of panels greatly increases the time necessary to produce airbag cushions, it is highly desirable to reduce the labor time which can be accomplished through the reduction in the length of seams required. Substantially straight seam configurations thus provide more cost-effective methods of producing such airbags.
However, even with the utilization of substantially straight seams to produce airbags cushions, a problem still resides in the need for labor-intensive cutting and sewing operations for large-scale manufacture. There remains a need then to reduce the amount of time to produce airbag cushions while simultaneously providing the greatest amount of fabric to allow for a sufficient volume of air (gas) to inflate the target airbag cushion during an inflation event (herein described as “available inflation airspace”). Such a desired method and product has not been available, particularly for passenger-side airbags which, as noted previously, require greater amounts of fabric for larger volumes of air (gas) to provide the greatest amount of protection area to a passenger. With greater amounts of fabric needed, generally this has translated into the need for longer seams to connect and attach fabric panels, which in turn translates into greater amounts of time needed for sewing, and the like, operations. Thus, a need exists to produce high available inflation airspace volume airbag cushions with minimal requirements in seam lengths to manufacture the overall cushion product. The prior art has not accorded any advancements or even discussions to this effect.
Furthermore, since the costs of producing airbag fabrics are relatively high and there is a general need to reduce such costs, there is a consequent need to more efficiently make use of the fabric by lowering the amount which needs to be cut (cutting operations also translate into higher labor costs), reducing the amount of fabric used in order to provide substantially lower packing volumes (in order to reduce the size of the airbag modules in cars since available space on dashboards, doors, and the like, are at a premium within automobiles), and reduce the shipping weight of such products (which translates into lower shipping costs), as well as other highly desired reasons. However, it has been problematic to reduce such utilized fabric amounts in the past without consequently also reducing the available inflation airspace volume within the cushion product. There is a need then to reduce the amount of time to produce airbag cushions while simultaneously providing the lowest amount of fabric and simultaneously allow for a sufficient volume of air (gas) to inflate the target airbag cushion during an inflation event (herein described as “available inflation airspace”). Such a desired method and product has not been available, particularly for passenger-side airbags which, as noted previously require greater amount of fabric for larger volumes of air (gas) to provide the greatest amount of protection area to a passenger. With greater amounts of fabric needed, generally this has translated into the need for longer seams to connect and attach fabric panels, which in turn translates into greater amounts of time needed for cutting, sewing, and the like, operations. Furthermore, there has not been any discussion within the prior art of the possibility of simultaneously reducing the amount of overall seam length and reducing the required amount of utilized fabric, all while providing sufficient volumes of available inflation airspace within the target airbag cushion. Thus, a need exists to produce high available inflation airspace volume airbag cushions with minimal requirements in seam lengths and fabric utilization to manufacture the overall cushion product. As noted above, the prior art has not accorded any advancements or even discussions to this effect.
In view of the foregoing, it is a general object of the present invention to provide a cost-effective, easy to manufacture airbag cushion for utilization within a vehicle restraint system. The term “vehicle restraint system” is intended to mean both inflatable occupant restraining cushion and the mechanical and chemical components (such as the inflation means, ignition means, propellant, and the like). It is a more particular object of the present invention to provide a vehicle restraint system wherein the target airbag cushion preferably comprises very low amounts of fabric and comprises all substantially straight seams to attach its plurality of fabric components together (although as noted above, other configured seams may also be used as long the overall required effective seam usage factor is met). A further object of this invention is to provide an easy-to-assemble airbag cushion which is minimally labor-intensive to manufacture, requires much lower fabric costs due to a substantial reduction in the overall requirement of utilized fabric amounts, and which also comprises an integrated looped pocket for the disposition of an inflator can within the airbag cushion. It is still a further object of this invention to provide a vehicle restraint system comprising an airbag cushion which provides the maximum amount of available inflation airspace volume simultaneously with the lowest length of seam (or seams) and lowest amount of utilized fabric necessary to manufacture the cushion. Another object of the invention is to provide a method of making a low cost airbag cushion (due to low levels of labor required to sew the component parts together and reduced amount of fabric to manufacture and cut) of simple and structurally efficient design.
To achieve these and other objects and in accordance with the purpose of the invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, the present invention provides an airbag cushion having at least two fabric components connected by at least one seam, wherein said airbag cushion possesses an effective seam usage factor of less than 0.11 and possesses an effective fabric usage factor of less than about 0.0330. The seam usage factor is derived from a seam usage index which concerns (and is defined as) the quotient of the total length of all seams present within the airbag cushion (measured in meters) over the total volume of available inflation airspace within the airbag cushion (measured in liters). The seam itself may be applied by any well known operation including, but not limited to, thread-stitching, ultrasonic stitching, and the like. The term “available inflation airspace,” as eluded to above, connotes the volume within which air (gas) would be transferred from an inflation assembly to the airbag cushion during and inflation, and consequent, inflation event. Such an airbag cushion must generally have at least one substantially straight seam, although, preferably, each seam possesses such a specific configuration. In order to produce such a specific airbag cushion, in fact, it is evident that the amount of sewing, stitching, and the like, required to form the end-product must be very low. A curved seam, although possible in this invention, requires potentially longer lengths of thread, etc., in order to attach the different fabric components of the target cushion. As a result, the utilization of curved, or other non-straight seams, should be minimized.
The effective seam usage factor (as defined within the correlating seam usage index formula, above) for the inventive airbag cushion then is preferably less than about 0.11, more preferably less than 0.10, still more preferably less than 0.09, even more preferably less than 0.07, and most preferably lower than 0.06. Thus, the volume of available inflation airspace within the airbag cushion should be as great as possible with the length of seam reduced to its absolute minimum.
The fabric usage factor is derived from an effective fabric usage index which concerns (and is defined as) the quotient of the total amount of fabric utilized to manufacture the airbag cushion (measured in square meters) over the total volume of available inflation airspace within the airbag cushion (measured in liters). In order to exhibit a sufficiently low effective fabric usage factor, the amount of fabric must be very low with a correspondingly high available inflation airspace volume. Of course, this airspace volume will be the same for each factor since the measurements of both factors (seam usage and fabric usage) are made for the same bag. Such an airbag cushion must have at least two fabric panels which require connection through the utilization of very small seam lengths (preferably, again, substantially straight seams). The inventive bag is able to provide high available inflation airspace volumes due to the particular configurations of these fabric panels. The configurations permit more efficient utilization of fabric webs by cutting panels from the webs and producing less waste of unused fabric. Furthermore, fabric panels can be connected together, preferably, by placing one over the other (if both are of the same configuration) and sewing both panels together; or similarly shaped portions of a single fabric panel may be folded over on top of each other and connected by a seam. This two-dimensional cushion then can be inflated into a three-dimensional object upon an inflation event and provide the required amount of coverage to protect a passenger during a collision. The preferred embodiment is discussed in greater detail below.
The effective fabric usage factor (as defined within the correlating seam usage index formula, above) for the inventive airbag cushion then is preferably less than about 0.033, more preferably less than 0.030, still more preferably less than 0.029, even more preferably less than 0.028, and most preferably lower than 0.027. Thus, the volume of available inflation airspace within the airbag cushion should be as great as possible with the amount of fabric utilized reduced to its absolute minimum while still providing sufficient protection to a passenger in an automobile during a collision event.
A one-piece construction will generally have a relatively low available inflation airspace volume, although the length of the total number of seams may be quite low; a driver-side airbag will generally consist of many seams (of relatively large overall length), particularly curved seams, and a relatively low volume of available airspace; and the prior art passenger-side airbags require large amount of fabric as well as complex sewing operations with numerous and rather long seams. Although the available inflation airspace volume in such passenger-side airbags is rather large, the total length of all the utilized seams is generally too great to meet the aforementioned preferred effective seam usage factor within that index and the total amount of utilized fabric is too large to meet the aforementioned preferred effective fabric usage factor within that index. The inventive cushion therefore is relatively easy to manufacture, requires very low sewing, or similar type, attachment operations of its fabric panel components, requires very low amounts of fabric, but is also configured to provide an optimum large amount of available inflation airspace for maximum protection to a passenger during a collision event.
The present invention also provides an airbag cushion possessing the required effective seam and fabric usage factors which also comprises a looped pocket for introduction of the inflator can of an inflator assembly. In the most preferred embodiment one large body panel is utilized having two mirror-image portions which, when folded over along the middle of the fabric panel, the boundaries of both portions are aligned. One substantially straight seam is then utilized to seal the adjacent (and similarly configured) side to the already-folded side and two opening will remain. The large opening is then covered by one panel of rectilinear shape; the small opening (opposite the large opening) will have extra fabric which can be overlapped (to provide extra reinforcing fabric at the point of potential inflation) and sewn to form the desired pocket in which to dispose the inflation can. This embodiment is discussed below in greater detail.
Additional objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice for the invention. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description of preferred embodiments are exemplary and explanatory only, and are not to be viewed as in any way restricting the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate several potentially preferred embodiments of the invention (the groupings of
Reference will now be made in detail to potentially preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which have been illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It is to be understood that it is in no way intended to limit the invention to such illustrated and described embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents as may be included within the true spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims and equivalents thereto.
Turning now to the drawings, wherein like elements are denoted by like reference numerals throughout the various views, in
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
These specific configurations and shapes provide the lowest overall seam usage and fabric usage, both as compared to the available inflation airspace volume. Specific measurements for each inventive cushion manufactured in this configuration (but with different amounts of fabric utilized) are further described in the Tables below.
Each of the panels utilized in these preferred embodiments may be formed from a number of materials including by way of example only and not limitation woven fabrics, knitted fabrics, non-woven fabrics, films and combinations thereof. Woven fabrics may be preferred with woven fabrics formed of tightly woven construction such as plain or panama weave constructions being particularly preferred. Such woven fabrics may be formed from yarns of polyester, polyamides such as nylon 6 and nylon-6,6 or other suitable material as may be known to those in the skill in the art. Multifilament yarns having a relatively low denier per filament rating of not greater than about 1-4 denier per filament may be desirable for bags requiring particular good foldability.
In application, woven fabrics formed from synthetic yarns having linear densities of about 40 denier to about 1200 denier are believed to be useful in the formation of the airbag according to the present invention. Fabrics formed from yams having linear densities of about 315 to about 840 are believed to be particularly useful, and fabrics formed from yams having linear densities in the range of about 400 to about 650 are believed to be most useful.
While each of the panels may be formed of the same material, the panels may also be formed from differing materials and or constructions such as, without limitation, coated or uncoated fabrics. Such fabrics may provide high permeability fabric having an air permeability of about 5 CFM per square foot or higher, preferably less than about 3 CFM per square foot or less when measured at a differential pressure of 0.5 inches of water across the fabric. Fabrics having permeabilities of about 1-3 CFM per square foot may be desirable as well. Fabrics having permeabilities below 2 CFM and preferably below 1 CFM in the uncoated state may be preferred. Such fabrics which have permeabilities below 2 CFM which permeability does not substantially increase by more than a factor of about 2 when the fabric is subjected to biaxial stresses in the range of up to about 100 pounds force may be particularly preferred. Fabrics which exhibit such characteristics which are formed by means of fluid jet weaving may be most preferred, although, as noted previously, weaving on jacquard and/or dobby looms also permits seam production without the need for any further labor-intensive sewing or welding operations.
In the event that a coating is utilized on one or more material panels, neoprene, silicone urethanes or disperse polyamides may be preferred. Coatings such as dispersed polyamides having dry add on weights of about 0.6 ounces per square yard or less and more preferably about 0.4 ounces per square yard or less and most preferably about 0.3 per square yard or less may be particularly preferred so as to minimize fabric weight and enhance foldability. It is, of course, to be understood that aside from the use of coatings, different characteristics in various panels may also be achieved through the use of fabrics incorporating differing weave densities and/or finishing treatments such as calendaring as may be known to those in the skill of the art.
While the airbag cushions according to the present invention have been illustrated and described herein, it is to be understood that such cushions may also include additional components such as shape defining tethers, gas vents, and the like as may be known to those in the skill of the art.
With regard to comparable airbag cushions, the following table presents comparative seam usage factors for other well known and commercially available airbag cushions. The labels used are those used within Standard & Poor's DRI, a well known publication which denotes many different types of products offered for sale to the automotive industry.
TABLE 1
Seam Usage Index Factors for Comparative
Commercially Available Airbag Cushions
Available
S&P DRI
Total Length of
Inflation Airspace
Seam Usage
Number
Total Seams (m)(“A”)
Volume (L)(“B”)
Factor (A/B)
GM-C4
12.42
95.00
0.1307
W202
14.83
129.00
0.1150
GM4200
12.43
90.00
0.1381
414T
14.83
128.00
0.1159
CY
14.83
128.00
0.1159
CF
16.83
128.00
0.1315
TABLE 2
Fabric Usage Index Factors for Comparative
Commercially Available Airbag Cushions
Available
S&P DRI
Total Amount of
Inflation Airspace
Fabric Usage
Number
Fabric Used (m)(“C”)
Volume (L)(“B”)
Factor (C/B)
GM-C4
4.47
95.00
0.0471
W202
4.34
129.00
0.0337
GM4200
3.89
90.00
0.0432
414T
4.35
128.00
0.0340
CY
4.34
128.00
0.0339
CF
4.53
128.00
0.0354
The 414T and CF bags listed above are tilted cushions for use in conjunction with relatively horizontal dashboards. The others are used in conjunciton with substantially vertically configured dashboards.
Generally, an airbag module manufacturer or automobile manufacturer will specify what dimensions and performance characteristics are needed for a specific model and make of car. Thus, airbag inflation airspace volume, front panel protection area (particularly for passenger-side airbag cushions), and sufficient overall protection for a passenger are such required specifications. In comparison with those commercially available airbag cushions listed above, the inventive airbag cushions which meet the same specifications (and actually exceed the overall passenger protection chacteristics versus the prior art cushions) but require less fabric, less seam length for sewing operations, and thus cost appreciably less than those competitive cushions. The dimensions, seam usage factors, and fabric usage factors for the inventive bags (which compare with those in Tables 1 and 2, above, directly, and as noted) are presented below in tabular form and are the same general shape as those presented within the drawings described above (but with larger pieces of fabric panels, etc.):
TABLE 3
Seam Usage Index Factors for Inventive Airbag Cushions
in Correlation to the S&P DRI Numbered Airbag Cushions
Requiring Similar Dimensions and Performance Characteristics
Correlated
Available
Bags by S&P
Total Length of
Inflation Airspace
Seam Usage
DRI Number
Total Seams (m)(“A”)
Volume (L)(“B”)
Factor (A/B)
GM-C4
7.56
95.00
0.0796
W202
6.90
129.00
0.0535
GM4200
7.20
90.00
0.0800
414T
6.90
128.00
0.0539
CY
5.35
128.00
0.0418
CF
6.90
128.00
0.0539
TABLE 4
Fabric Usage Index Factors for Inventive Airbag Cushions
in Correlation to the S&P DRI Numbered Airbag Cushions
Requiring Similar Dimensions and Performance Characteristic
Correlated
Available
Bags by S&P
Total Amount of
Inflation Airspace
Fabric Usage
DRI Number
Fabric Used (m)(“C”)
Volume (L)(“B”)
Factor (C/B)
GM-C4
2.41
95.00
0.0253
W202
3.50
129.00
0.0271
GM4200
2.58
90.00
0.0287
414T
3.64
128.00
0.0284
CY
3.64
128.00
0.0284
CF
3.50
128.00
0.0273
Clearly, the inventive bags, which possess the same available inflation airspace volume and front fabric panel area as the comparative prior art commercially available cushions (bags), require much less in the way of total seam length and fabric components which translates into overall much lower effective seam and fabric usage factors. Furthermore, as noted above, in standard crash tests, these inventive bags (cushions) either performed as well as or outperformed their commercially available, more expensive, counterparts.
While specific embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited thereto, since modifications may certainly be made and other embodiments of the principals of this invention will no doubt occur to those skilled in the art. Therefore, it is contemplated by the appended claims to cover any such modifications and other embodiments as incorporate the features of this invention which in the true spirit and scope of the claims hereto.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
7261927, | Jul 30 1999 | Milliken & Company | Structurally efficient airbag cushion exhibiting low seam usage and simultaneously high available inflation volume |
7648167, | Oct 06 2006 | ZODIAC AUTOMOTIVE US INC | Airbags formed with efficient use of materials and methods of forming such airbags |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3792873, | |||
4921735, | Nov 03 1987 | Air bag for motor vehicles | |
4944529, | Dec 14 1985 | Audi AG. | Inflatable protective cushion |
5087071, | Aug 01 1990 | TRW VEHICLE SAFETY SYSTEMS INC , A CORP OF DE | Vehicle air bag structure and method of forming |
5090729, | Dec 15 1989 | Takata Corporation | Air bag for a passenger |
5093163, | Sep 07 1989 | Polyamide High Performance GmbH | Uncoated fabric for airbags |
5110666, | Mar 20 1989 | REEVES BROTHERS INC A DE CORPORATION | Coated fabric structure for air bag applications |
5236775, | Feb 12 1990 | INVISTA NORTH AMERICA S A R L | Fabric for airbag |
5277230, | Feb 22 1993 | Milliken Research Corporation | Double twillwoven air bag fabric |
5310216, | Oct 30 1992 | Key Safety Systems, Inc | Flat sew pattern passenger air bag |
5316337, | Mar 30 1992 | TOYODA GOSEI CO , LTD | Inflatable bags for airbag passive restraint systems for front seat passenger and methods for manufacturing thereof |
5356680, | Jul 16 1991 | Polyamide High Performance GmbH | Industrial fabrics of controlled air permeability and high ageing resistance and manufacture thereof |
5365651, | Jul 01 1993 | Morton International, Inc. | Airbag assembly system and tool |
5405164, | Mar 04 1994 | Autoliv ASP, Inc | Hybrid inflator retention in automotive airbag module |
5407223, | Feb 04 1994 | Autoliv ASP, Inc | Slide-together airbag module |
5423273, | Feb 01 1994 | General Motors Corporation | Single seam cube shaped restraint cushion |
5454587, | Jul 08 1994 | Autoliv ASP, Inc | Connector for mounting inflator in airbag module |
5454594, | Apr 30 1993 | TRW Repa GmbH | Inflatable gas bag for vehicle occupant restraining systems |
5458364, | Aug 22 1994 | Autoliv ASP, Inc | Inflator secured in diffuser housing of airbag module assembly by locking end cap |
5477890, | Jul 31 1993 | Polyamide High Performance GmbH | Integrated weaving and wet treatment method for manufacturing uncoated industrial woven fabrics |
5498024, | Aug 17 1995 | Autoliv ASP, Inc | Inflatable restraint assembly |
5503197, | Mar 30 1994 | Milliken & Company | Method for producing high weave density airbag fabric on a water-jet loom using unsized yarns |
5508073, | Feb 26 1991 | Polyamide High Performance GmbH | Uncoated fabric for manufacturing air bags |
5520414, | Nov 23 1994 | Milliken Research Corporation | Inflatable restraint cushion |
5533755, | Jun 28 1993 | Sandia Corporation | Structurally efficient inflatable protective device |
5544911, | Jul 05 1995 | Autoliv ASP, Inc | Airbag module diffuser with flange extensions |
5547212, | Aug 22 1995 | Autoliv ASP, Inc | Passenger side airbag inflator with flanged mounting adapter |
5553886, | Aug 22 1995 | Autoliv ASP, Inc | Flangeless airbag inflator with mounting adaptor |
5564738, | Aug 10 1995 | Autoliv ASP, Inc | Overflow channeling reaction canister assembly |
5564739, | Dec 07 1995 | Takata, Inc. | Side impact airbag module with soft cover |
5566973, | Oct 04 1995 | Autoliv ASP, Inc | Advanced passenger inflator with slide in attachment to extruded module |
5620200, | Oct 31 1995 | Autoliv ASP, Inc | Airbag module reaction canister endwall with airbag inflator mount |
5652389, | May 22 1996 | COMMERCE, UNITED STATED OF AMERICA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY | Non-contact method and apparatus for inspection of inertia welds |
5683100, | Jul 12 1996 | Autoliv ASP, Inc | Airbag cushion retainer with annular sewing area |
5692777, | Apr 27 1995 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Low permeability inflatable restraint fabric |
5704402, | Apr 01 1996 | Milliken Research Corporation | Air bag fabric |
5709405, | Apr 10 1996 | Autoliv ASP, Inc | Variable mass flow airbag module |
6086095, | Jul 30 1999 | Milliken & Company | Airbag cushion exhibiting low seam and fabric usage and simultaneously high available inflation volume |
6375219, | Jul 30 1999 | Milliken & Company | Airbag cushion exhibiting low fabric usage and simultaneously high available inflation volume |
6472033, | Jul 30 1999 | Milliken & Company | Airbag cushion exhibiting low seam usage and simultaneously high available inflation volume |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 16 2003 | Milliken & Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 21 2008 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jul 13 2008 | EXPX: Patent Reinstated After Maintenance Fee Payment Confirmed. |
Sep 08 2008 | M1558: Surcharge, Petition to Accept Pymt After Exp, Unintentional. |
Sep 08 2008 | PMFP: Petition Related to Maintenance Fees Filed. |
Sep 17 2008 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 03 2009 | R1551: Refund - Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 05 2009 | PMFG: Petition Related to Maintenance Fees Granted. |
Feb 20 2012 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jul 11 2012 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Mar 07 2009 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Sep 07 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 07 2010 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Mar 07 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Mar 07 2013 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Sep 07 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 07 2014 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Mar 07 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Mar 07 2017 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Sep 07 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 07 2018 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Mar 07 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |