Removal of the nucleotide sequence encoding the signal peptide from the ingap coding sequence allows cultured cells to express substantial amounts of ingap activity. Previous attempts have provided only low yields of ingap, possibly because the signal sequence of ingap is toxic to the cells.
|
0. 47. A host cell comprising a recombinant construct comprising a first nucleotide sequence encoding mature human ingap operably linked to a transcriptional initiation site and a translational initiation site, wherein a second nucleotide sequence encoding a signal peptide according to SEQ ID NO: 5 is not present immediately 5′ of said first nucleotide sequence.
15. A An isolated host cell comprising a recombinant construct comprising a first nucleotide sequence encoding amino acids 27 to 175 as shown in SEQ ID NO: 6 operably linked to a transcriptional iron initiation site and a translational initiation site, wherein a second nucleotide sequence encoding a signal peptide is not present immediately 5+ 5′ of said first nucleotide sequence.
0. 23. A method of making an expression construct for producing ingap in a recombinant host cell, comprising the step of:
linking a transcription initiation site, a translation initiation site, and a coding sequence for mature human ingap consisting of nucleotides 12 to 456 of SEQ ID NO: 4, to make an expression construct which is devoid of the signal sequence of the coding sequence of ingap.
1. A recombinant construct for expression of islet Neogenesis Associated protein or ingap activity a protein which stimulates islet cell neogenesis comprising:
a first nucleotide sequence encoding amino acids residues 27 to 175 as shown in SEQ ID NO: 6 operably linked to a transcriptional initiation site and a translational initiation site, wherein a second nucleotide sequence encoding a signal peptide is not present immediately 5′ of said first nucleotide sequence.
0. 29. A recombinant construct for expression of a protein which stimulates islet cell neogenesis, comprising:
a first nucleotide sequence encoding mature human ingap consisting of nucleotides 12 to 456 of SEQ ID NO: 4, said first nucleotide sequence being operably linked to a transcriptional initiation site and a translational initiation site, wherein a second nucleotide sequence encoding a signal peptide according to SEQ ID NO: 5 is not present immediately 5′ of said first nucleotide sequence.
13. A method of producing biologically active islet Neogenesis Associated protein or ingap protein from a recombinant host cell comprising the steps of:
culturing a host cell comprising a recombinant construct comprising a first nucleotide sequence encoding amino acids residues 27 to 175 as shown in SEQ ID NO: 6 operably linked to a transcriptional initiation site and a translational initiation site, wherein a second nucleotide sequence encoding a signal peptide is not present immediately 5′ of said first nucleotide sequence, and
recovering protein from said cultured host cell.
0. 21. A pair of oligonucleotide primers for amplifying a coding sequence consisting of nucleotides 12 to 456 of SEQ ID NO: 4, wherein each of said oligonucleotide primers hybridizes to an opposite strand of a double-stranded ingap template under conditions sufficient for amplifying, wherein a first of said oligonucleotide primers hybridizes to the 5′ end of the coding sequence for mature human ingap and the second of said oligonucleotide primers hybridizes to the 3′ end of the nucleotide sequence encoding mature human ingap under conditions sufficient for amplifying nucleotides 12 to 456 of SEQ ID NO: 4.
0. 45. A method of producing biologically active islet Neogenesis Associated protein (ingap) from a recombinant host cell comprising the steps of:
culturing a host cell comprising a recombinant construct comprising a first nucleotide sequence encoding mature human ingap consisting of nucleotides 12 to 456 of SEQ ID NO: 4 operably linked to a transcriptional initiation site and a translational initiation site, wherein a second nucleotide sequence encoding a signal peptide according to SEQ ID NO: 5 is not present immediately 5′ of said first nucleotide sequence; and
recovering protein from said cultured host cell.
2. The construct of
3. The construct of
4. The construct of
6. The construct of
7. The construct of
8. The construct of
10. The construct of
11. The construct of
12. The construct of
14. The method of
16. The construct of
17. The method of
18. The host cell of
0. 19. The construct of
0. 20. The construct of
0. 22. The pair of oligonucleotide primers of
0. 24. The method of
0. 25. The method of
0. 26. The method of
0. 27. The method of
0. 28. The method of
0. 30. The construct of
0. 31. The construct of
0. 32. The construct of
0. 33. The construct of
0. 34. The construct of
0. 35. The construct of
0. 36. The construct of
0. 37. The construct of
0. 38. The construct of
0. 39. The construct of
0. 40. The construct of
0. 41. The construct of
0. 42. The construct of
0. 43. The construct of
0. 44. The construct of
0. 46. The method of
0. 48. The method of
0. 49. The pair of oligonucleotide primers of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. Ser. No. 08/741,096, filed Oct. 30, 1996, now abandoned protein are included in the constructs. Preferably the entire signal sequence is deleted. However, it is possible that only a portion of the signal sequence must be deleted to obtain excellent expression. Thus some portion of the signal sequence might be retained in the constructs.
Deletion of the 5′ untranslated region, nucleotides 1-16, is also desirable. However, it is not known if this is necessary to achieve excellent expression. Thus the 5′ untranslated region may be retained in some constructs without departing from the spirit of the invention.
A host cell according to the invention can be transfected or transformed with a recombinant construct according to the present invention. The host may be a bacteria, yeast, insect, or mammalian cell. For eukaryotic expression of INGAP, any cell lines suitable for protein expression may be used, including COS-7 cells and CHO cells.
Selection of suitable promoters and translational initiators for use in the appropriate host cell is well within the ability of those skilled in the art. For eukaryotic expression system, it is exceedingly useful to choose a promoter sequence which is capable of initiating constitutive transcription to achieve constitutive high level expression of the protein. Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat (RSVLTR) is an example of such promoter, although others as are known in the art can be used.
Host cells may be transformed, transfected, mated or infected with the recombinant host cell of the present invention. Culturing of host cells can be performed using techniques and media which are well known in the art. Again, a suitable medium and technique can be selected by an ordinary skilled artisan.
The above disclosure generally describes the present invention. A more complete understanding can be obtained by reference to the following specific examples which are provided herein for purposes of illustration only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
This example describes the experimental design employed.
We generated a new INGAP cDNA by PCR which excluded the 5′ UTR region (nucleotides 1-16 in SEQ ID: 1) and nucleotides encoding the signal peptide (nucleotides 17-94 SEQ ID NO: 1) and created two new restriction enzyme recognition sites enabling the insertion of the new construct into a new pQE-31 expression vector. This new ligated construct was transformed into TOP10F′ competent cells (E. coli host strain from Invitrogen). The positive clones were identified, verified by restriction enzyme digestion and the DNA isolated. The DNA was now transformed into a different competent E. coli strain, M15(pREP4) and expression of the protein was induced by IPTG (isopropyl-beta, D-thiogalactopyranoside) which inhibits the repressor, facilitating expression of the protein from the M15 promoter/operator. The reason for the intermediate transformation of the ligated material into TOP10F′ is that these cells are highly competent increasing the odds of getting insert positive colonies. The M15(pREP4) cells that were used for protein expression do not attain competency levels high enough to guarantee transformation of the ligation products. The resultant plasmid DNA obtained from the transformation of the TOP10F′ was sufficient to enhance the transformation of the M15(pREP4) cells. The His-tagged protein was isolated by Ni+2 agarose affinity purification.
We used a PCR approach to generate a new INGAP cDNA which excludes the 5′ UTR region (nucleotides 1-16 in SEQ ID NO: 1) and nucleotides encoding the signal peptide.
The nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) and corresponding amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NO: 5) that have been excluded are as follows: (the bolded area represents the sequence of the signal peptide)
CTGCAAGACAGGTAACC ATG ATG CTT CCC ATG ACC CTC TGT AGG
MET MET Leu Pro MET The Leu Cys Arg
ATG TCT TGG ATG CTG CTT TCC TGC CTG ATG TTC CTT TCT TGG
MET Ser Trp MET Leu Leu Ser Cys Leu MET Phe Leu Ser Trp
GTG GAA GGT
Val Glu Gly
This example describes the use of polymerase chain reaction to synthesize INGMAT (a construct which lacks the signal peptide sequence, i.e., which encodes the mature protein).
Oligonucleotide design:
Oligonucleotides for PCR were designed to incorporate restriction enzyme recognition sites at their respective 5′ ends. The oligonucleotide designed for the 5′ end of the gene incorporates a Bam HI site followed by 20 nucleotides corresponding to the N-terminus of the mature protein. The oligonucleotide designed for the 3′ end incorporates an Xho I site followed by 20 untranslated nucleotides. The PCR product generated from these primers contains the mature INGAP sequence and the native protein termination codon.
The following is the sequence of the oligonucleotides used:
Reaction conditions
Template: (50 ng INGAP original cDNA
5 μl
removed from pCDNA3)
MgCl2:
4 μl
10 × PCR buffer
5 μl
dATP
1 μl
dCTP
1 μl
dGTP
1 μl
dTTP
1 μl
5′ primer
1 μl
3′ primer
1 μl
H2O
29 μl
Taq polymerase
1 μl
total volume =
50 μl
The PCR products were then electrophoresed on a 5% PAGE in TBE. Ethidium bromide stained PCR products corresponding to the expected size for the construct were cut from the gel. The gel fragments were electro-eluted into 0.5 ml of TBE, precipitated with 50 μl 3M sodium acetate and 1 ml of isopropanol at −80° C. for 20 min, centrifuged, washed once with 1 ml of isopropanol, washed once with 1 ml of 70% ethanol, and then dried under vacuum. The dried pellet was resuspended in 50 μl H2O and quantified. At the end of this step the sequence of the PCR product that contains both restriction sites minus the signal sequence and 5′ UTR was as follows (SEQ ID NO: 4):
5′-CC GCG GAT CCC GAA GAA TCT CAA AAG AAA CTGCCT
TCT TCA CGT ATA ACC TGT CCT CAA GGC TCT GTA GCC TAT
GGG TCC TAT TGC TAT TCA CTG ATT TTG ATA CCA CAG ACC
TGG TCT AAT GCA GAA CTA TCC TGC CAG ATG CAT TTC TCA
GGA CAC CTG GCA TTT CTT CTC AGT ACT GGT GAA ATT ACC
TTC GTG TCC TCC CTT GTG AAG AAC AGT TTG ACG GCC TAC
CAG TAC ATC TGG ATT GGA CTC CAT GAT CCC TCA CAT GGT
ACA CTA CCC AAC GGA AGT GGA TGG AGG TGG AGC AGT
TCC AAT GTG CTG ACC TTC TAT AAC TGG GAG AGG AAC CCC
TCT ATT GCT GCT GAC CGT GGT TAT TGT GCA GTT TTG TCT
CAG AAA TCA GGT TTT CAG AAG TGG AGA GAT TTT AAT TGT
GAA AAT GAG CTT CCC TAT ATC TGC AAA TTC AAG GTC TAG
GGC AGT TCT AAT TTC AAC AGC TTG AAA ATA TTA TGA AGC
TCA CAT GGA CAA GGA AGC AAG TAT GAG GAT TCA CTC
AGG AAG AGC ACT CGA GCC GGT C-3′
*The bolded areas represent the primers.
This example describes the creation of a plasmid containing the expression construct.
We performed two parallel restriction enzyme digestion reactions using 2.5 μg of both the INGMAT PCR product and pQE-31 vector. INGMAT was digested with Bam HI and Xho I simultaneously in a 30 μl volume. PQE-31 was digested with Bam HI and Sal I simultaneously in a 30 μl volume. Both digestion reactions were carried out at 37° C. for a period of 4 hours. After the reactions were completed, 400 ng of each was electrophoresed on a 1.5% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide to assure complete digestion. The remainder (˜2.1 ug) of both digestion reactions were passed over a sepharose G-50 to remove the small DNA fragments followed by two equal volume phenol extractions. The extracted DNA was then precipitated with 2 volumes of ethanol and 1/10 volume 3M sodium acetate at −80° C. for 20 minutes, centrifuged, washed twice with 70% ethanol and dried under vacuum. The pellets were resuspended in 25 μl H2O and quantified.
The pQE-31 expression system was purchased from QIAGEN Inc. Chatsworth, Calif.
INGMAT (Bam HI/Xho I) and pQE-31(Bam HI/Sal I) have compatible ends suitable for ligation. As a result of the ligation the Sal I restriction site in the vector will be eliminated.
Ligation conditions using a 2:1 vector to insert molar ratio.
pQE31(vector) 517 ng
9 μl
INGMAT (insert) 165 ng
2.5 μl
10 × ligation buffer
5 μl
10 mM rATP
5 μl
T4 Ligase 4u
1 μl
H2O
27.5 μl
final volume =
50 μl
The ligation reactions were incubated at 4° C. for 16 hours.
We removed 5 μl of the ligation reaction into 100 μl of competent TOP10F′ cells, (TOP10F′ cells were purchased from Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif.) with 0.5 μl of 500 mM β-mercaptoethanol and incubated on ice for 30 minutes, heat shocked for 45 seconds at 42° C., and recovered on ice for 2 minutes. Then we added 1 ml of prewarmed S° C. media and incubated at 37° C. with shaking at 225 rpm for 1 hour followed by plating all the transformation reaction on LB broth agar plates containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin.
Colony containing plates were lifted onto Nytran membranes. The colonies were lysed with 0.5M NaOH, neutralized, and the resultant DNA bound to the membrane by baking at 80° C. for 1 hour. The membranes were then hybridized in 50% formaldehyde, 5×SSPE at 50° C. for 16 hours with 3×106 cpm/ml of 32P random primed INGAP cDNA. The membranes were washed at high stringency and exposed to X-ray film. Positive colonies were matched up to the X-ray film and grown up in 3 mls of LB with ampicillin.
DNA was isolated from the small cultures using alkaline lysis, phenol extracted, precipitated, dried, and resuspended in 50 μl H2O. A small aliquot of each of the isolated DNA were digested with Bam HI and Hind III to release inserts. The digested DNAs were electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose and stained with ethidium bromide and positive inserts identified at approximately 510 bp size range. We took four of the insert containing plasmids and incubated them in the presence of RNAse to remove any residual bacterial RNA.
We removed 5 μl of the cleaned DNA isolated in section IIE and transfer it into 100 μl of M15(pREP4) competent cells. The mixture was incubated on ice for 30 minutes, heat shocked for 45 seconds at 42° C., and recovered on ice for 2 minutes. 1 ml of prewarmed SOC media was added and incubated at 37° C. with shaking at 225 rpm for 90 minutes. All of the transformation reaction was plated on LB broth agar plates containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin and 25 μg/ml kanamycin.
Eight colonies were picked and grown up in LB with ampicillin. DNA was isolated from the small cultures using alkaline lysis extraction procedures, phenol extracted, precipitated, dried, and resuspended in 50 μl H2O. A small aliquot of each of the isolated DNA were digested with Bam HI and Hind III to release inserts. The digested DNA was run on 1.5% agarose gel and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide. Several of the transformants which demonstrated the plasmid with inserts of the correct size as well as the presence of the pREP4 plasmid were stored in 50% glycerol at −80° C. to be used for protein production.
This example describes denaturing metal affinity protein chromatography isolation of the his tagged INGAP protein without signal peptide. (Procedure for a 250 ml pINGMATHIS transformed M15(pREP4) culture. pINGMATHIS is the INGMATHIS construct ligated into the pQE-31 vector.)
We grew a 25 ml overnight in LB with 100 g/ml ampicillin and 25 μg/ml kanamycin antibiotic. We started a 250 ml LB plus 100 μg/ml ampicillin and 25 μg/ml kanamycin culture with 5 ml of the overnight. (1:50) Grown until ABS600=0.0.75 to 0.9 (actual OD=0.866). Added 5 ml of 100 mM IPTG (2 mM final) to induce production of the protein. Continue growing for 4 hours in the case of INGAP. Collected the bacteria and spin at 6000 rpm for 20 minutes, discarded the supernatant. The pellet was frozen until ready to use at −70° C.
Prepare as much as will be needed. (Use 10 ml of the 50% Ni+2 NTA for each 250 ml derived bacterial pellet). Place 16 ml of the 50% slurry into a disposable 50 ml centrifuge tube. Centrifuge for 2 minutes at 800×g and discard the supernatant. Add 42 ml of sterile water, resuspend the resin. Centrifuge for 2 minutes at 800×G and discard the supernatant. Add 42 ml of sterile water, resuspend the resin. Centrifuge for 2 minutes at 800×G and discard the supernatant. Add 42 ml of binding/lysis buffer A (6M Guanidine HCl, 0.1M sodium phosphate, 0.01M Tris, pH 8.0) and resuspend the resin. Centrifuge for 2 minutes at 800×G and discard the supernatant. Add 42 ml of binding/lysis buffer A (6M Guanidine HCL, 0.1M sodium phosphate, 0.01M Tris, pH 8.0) and resuspend the resin. Centrifuge for 2 minutes at 800×G and discard the supernatant. Add 42 ml of binding/lysis buffer A (6M Guanidine HCL, 0.1M sodium phosphate, 0.01M Tris, pH 8.0) and resuspend the resin. Centrifuge for 2 minutes at 800×G and discard the supernatant. Bring the total volume up to 10 ml with buffer A. The slurry is now ready for the application of the lysed bacteria.
Thaw the bacterial pellet for 15 minutes at room temperature. Resuspend the pellet in 12.5 ml of lysis buffer A. (6M Guanidine HCL, 0.1M sodium phosphate, 0.01M Tris, pH 8.0). Transfer the resuspension to a 50 ml centrifuge tube. Freeze the resuspension/lysate at −70 until solid. Thaw at room temperature. Place the lysate on a rotator for 60 minutes at room temperature. Centrifuge the lysate for 15 minutes at 10,000×G. Collect the supernatant and add the 10 ml of prepared Ni2+NTA. Rotate for 45 minutes. Load the slurry onto a 1.6 cm diameter column and allow to flow through by gravity.
Flow through 50 ml of buffer A. (No need to collect.) Flow through 40 ml of buffer B (8M Urea, 0.1M Sodium phosphate, 0.01M Tris, pH 8.0). (No need to collect.) but A280 should be at or near zero before continuing, if not, then wash with more. Wash through 40 ml of buffer C, same as B but pH 6.3. Collect 3 ml fractions. Wash through 40 ml of buffer D, same as B but pH 5.9. Collect 3 ml fractions.
Wash through 40 ml of buffer E, same as B but pH 4.5. Collect 3 ml fractions. At this point the protein should be in one of the fractions taken. Read the absorbance at 280 of all the fractions to discern where the protein is. Pool, reduce, and SDS page electrophoresis as necessary.
In order to purify the expressed protein, we changed the carrier solution of the fraction extracted from the nickel/NTA at pH 4.5 to Tris buffer using dialysis. Dialysis tubing with a molecular weight cut-off of 3000 was prepared by boiling in 5 mM EDTA/200 mM sodium bicarbonate for 5 minutes. The tubing was rinsed briefly in deionized water and boiled another 5 minutes in the bicarbonate solution. The tubing was returned to deionized water, covered with aluminum foil and autoclaved for 10 minutes on a liquid cycle. The tubing was handled with latex gloves during the entire procedure.
One ml of the protein solution from the nickel/NTA column in 6M guanidine HCl was dialyzed against 4 liters of 25 mM Tris buffer at pH 8.5 for 12 hours. After dialysis, there were 2 mls of protein solution with a protein concentration of 800 ug/ml.
This example describes analytical techniques confirming the identity of the product.
In order to test for the overexpression of the INGAP protein , discontinuous denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed on the dialyzed protein solution using the Hoefer SE250 Might Small II apparatus. The separating gel was prepared with 15% acrylamide, 1.35% bis-acrylamide in 375 mM Tris buffer at pH 8.8 with 0.05% sodium dodecyl sulfate. Polymerization was induced by addition of 0.05% ammonium persulfate and 20 μl TEMED/15 ml solution. The solution was placed in the gel plate apparatus for polymerization. The stacking gel was poured with the same solution, except the Tris buffer was 125 mM at pH 6.8, and the acrylamide concentration was 4%. The protein samples were diluted 1:1 with sample buffer (125 mM Tris-Cl, pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, and 10% 2-mercaptoethanol).
The upper and lower tank buffers were identical, containing 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine and 0.1% SDS at pH 8.3. Two gels were loaded with 20 μl each of bacterial lysate without transfection (CBL,368 ug/ml), bacterial lysate with transfection (TBL, 341 ug/ml), the fractions from Ni-NTA chromatography (eluted at pH6.3, 110 ug/ml; pH 5.9, 100 ug/ml; and pH 4.5, 800 ug/ml) and standards (Rainbow Markers, Amersham and Dalton Mark-VII, Sigma). Electrophoresis was performed at 20 mA constant current until the dye front entered the separating gel, and at 60 mA constant current until the dye front reached 0.5 cm from the bottom. The gels were then removed and one was fixed with 45% methanol/10% acetic acid for one hour, and the other was placed in transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 20% methanol, pH 8.3) for 20-30 minutes.
The fixed gel was equilibrated with 2 changes of 10% ethanol/5% acetic acid for 30 minutes each. The gel was then exposed to a 0.0032N HNO3/K2Cr2O7 solution for 5 minutes. The gel was washed in deionized water 3 times for 10 minutes each. The gel was impregnated with silver using 0.1 g AgNO3/50 ml H2O for 30 minutes. The silver solution was washed off the gel in deionized water for 5 minutes. The gel was then exposed to a developer solution (29.7 g anhydrous Na2CO3 in 1 liter H2O with 0.5 ml formalin) in 5 minute intervals between changes until the desired density was reached. The development was stopped with 10% acetic acid, and the gel stored in H2O.
The gel showed a protein band of approximately 19 kD that was prominent in the bacterial lysate from transfected cells and in the elution fraction from pH 4.5 on nickel/NTA (FIG. 1). This protein was not represented in any of the other samples. This is consistent with the size of INGAP protein and with interaction of the inserted histidine tagging region with the nickel/NTA column matrix.
Immobilon-P PVDF membrane was wetted with 100% methanol, and equilibrated with transfer buffer for 10 minutes. The gel was removed from transfer buffer and placed on the PVDF membrane. All bubbles between the membrane and the gel were removed. The combination was placed between Whatmann 3 mm filter paper wetted with transfer buffer and the whole “sandwich” was placed in the cassette of a Hoefer transfer tank. The cassette was placed in the transfer tank filled with transfer buffer with the gel toward the cathode. The transfer was performed at 12V constant voltage for 18 hours.
After transfer, the membrane was placed in a blocking buffer of 0.5M Tris, 2M NaCl and 1% polyethylene glycol with 5% bovine serum albumin and 10% goat serum at room temperature for 1 hour. The membrane was then placed into 20 ml of blocking buffer containing INGAP antibody 945-2 at a dilution of 1:5000 and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. The membrane was then washed 3 times for 15 minutes each with 50 ml of washing buffer (0.4% Tween-20 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH 7.4). The membrane was then incubated for 1 hour at room temperature in washing buffer containing anti-rabbit IgG (whole molecule, Sigma Cat #A-0545) peroxidase conjugate at a 1:160,000 dilution. The membrane was washed 3 times for 5 minutes in 50 ml of 0.2% Tween-20 in PBS, followed by 3 washes of 5 minutes each with 0.1% Tween-20 in PBS. The blot was revealed using the enzyme chemiluminescence kit from Amersham Corp., Arlington, Ill. according to instructions. The ECL blot was exposed to Kodak X-Omat AR-5 X-ray film for 20 minutes.
ECL of the blot revealed strong protein recognition of the overexpressed 19 kD proteins in the whole lysate from transfected bacteria (IBL) and the pH 4.5 fraction that were visualized on the SDS-PAGE gels (FIG. 2). In addition, there was a protein band recognized in both bacterial lysates at 40 kD, implying that this protein is weakly recognized and is a bacterial protein rather than a product of the transfection. Finally, there was a light hand at 14 kD recognized by the antibody in both the transfected bacterial lysate and in the pH 4.5 fraction. This may either be another protein or a lytic fraction of the INGAP protein . Given the engineering done to produce the INGAP protein it is most likely a lytic fraction of INGAP.
In summary, we have been able to express INGAP protein in a prokaryotic system by excluding the 5′ UTR and the signal peptide and insertion of the new construct into a new vector. The resultant protein is of the predicted molecular size of INGAP monomer and reacts with the antibody to INGAP in a Western analysis. The protein shares with INGAP peptide the ability to induce ductal cell proliferation.
This example describes the experimental design employed for INGAP expression in eukaryotic systems.
We generated an INGAP cDNA by PCR which excluded the 5′ UTR region (nucleotides 1-16 in SEQ ID: 1) and nucleotides encoding the signal peptide (nucleotides 17-94 SEQ ID NO: 1). The reason for excluding the 5′ UTR region was to create a protein that is similar to the native protein in which the 5′ UTR is not part of the protein. We also created two new restriction enzyme recognition sites enabling the insertion of the new construct into a new pEBVHis-B eukaryotic expression vector. This new ligated construct was transformed into INVαF′ competent cells (E. coli host strain from Invitrogen). The positive clones were identified, verified by restriction enzyme digestion and the DNA isolated and transfected into COS-7 cells. The His-tagged protein was isolated by Ni+2 agarose affinity purification. The isolated protein showed biological activity when used to stimulate proliferation of ARIP (ductal) cells as measured by 3H-TdR incorporation.
We used a PCR approach to generate a new INGAP cDNA which excludes the 5′ UTR region (nucleotides 1-16 in SEQ ID NO: 1) and nucleotides encoding the signal peptide.
The sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) that has been excluded is as follows: (the bolded area represents the sequence of the signal peptide)
CTGCAAGACAGGTACCATG ATG CTT CCC ATG ACC CTC TGT
MET MET Leu Pro MET The Leu Cys
AGG ATG TCT TGG ATG CTG CTT TCC TGC CTG ATG TTC
Arg MET Ser Trp MET Leu Leu Ser Cys Leu MET Phe
CTT TCT TGG GTG GAA GGT
Leu Ser Trp Val Glu Gly
To engineer the new INGAP construct we designed oligonucleotides corresponding to the 5′ and 3′ ends of the INGAP sequence to be amplified.
This example describes the use of polymerase chain reaction to synthesize INGMAT (construct which lacks the signal peptide sequence, i.e., which encodes the mature protein).
Oligonucleotides for PCR were designed to incorporate restriction enzyme recognition sites at their respective 5′ ends. The oligonucleotide designed for the 5′ end of the gene incorporates a Bam HI site followed by 20 nucleotides corresponding to the N-terminus of the mature protein. The oligonucleotide designed for the 3′ end incorporates an Xho I site followed by 20 untranslated nucleotides. The PCR product generated from these primers contains the mature INGAP sequence and the native protein termination codon.
The following is the sequence of the oligonucleotides used:
Reaction conditions
Template: (50 ng INGAP original cDNA
5 μl
removed from pCDNA3)
MgCl2:
4 μl
10 × PCR buffer
5 μl
dATP
1 μl
dCTP
1 μl
dGTP
1 μl
dTTP
1 μl
5′ primer
1 μl
3′ primer
1 μl
H2O
29 μl
Taq polymerase
1 μl
total volume =
50 μl
The PCR products were then electrophoresed on a 5% PAGE in TBE. Ethidium bromide stained PCR products corresponding to the expected size for the construct were cut from the gel. The gel fragments were electro-eluted into 0.5 ml of TBE, precipitated with 50 μl 3M sodium acetate and 1 ml of isopropanol at −80° C. for 20 min, centrifuged, washed once with 1 ml of isopropanol, washed once with 1 ml of 70% ethanol, and then dried under vacuum. The dried pellet was resuspended in 50 μl H2O and quantified. At the end of this step the sequence of the PCR product that contains both restriction sites minus the signal sequence and 5′ UTR was as follows (SEQ ID NO: 4):
5′-CC GCG GAT CCC GAA GAA TCT CAA AAG AAA CTGCCT
TCT TCA CGT ATA ACC TGT CCT CAA GGC TCT GTA GAA TAT
GGG TCC TAT TGC TAT TCA CTG ATT TTG ATA CCA CAG ACC
TGG TCT AAT GCA GAA CTA TCC TGC CAG ATG CAT TTC TCA
GGA CAC CTG GCA TTT CTT CTC AGT ACT GGT GAA ATT ACC
TTC GTG TCC TCC CTT GTG AAG AAC AGT TTG ACG GCC TAC
CAG TAC ATC TGG ATT GGA CTC CAT GAT CCC TCA CAT GGT
ACA CTA CCC AAC GGA AGT GGA TGG AGG TGG AGC AGT
TCC AAT GTG CTG ACC TTC TAT AAC TGG GAG AGG AAC CCC
TCT ATT GCT GCT GAC CGT GGT TAT TGT GCA GTT TTG TCT
CAG AAA TCA GGT TTT CAG AAG TGG AGA GAT TTT AAT TGT
GAA AAT GAG CTT CCC TAT ATC TGC AAA TTC AAG GTC TAG
GGC AGT TCT AAT TTC AAC AGC TTG AAA ATA TTA TGA AGC
TCA CAT GGA CAA GGA AGC AAG TAT GAG GAT TCA CTC
AGG AAG AGC ACT CGA GCC GGT C-3′
*The bolded areas represent the primers.
This example describes the creation of a plasmid containing an expression construct for expression in eukaryotic systems.
We performed two parallel restriction enzyme digestion reactions using 2.5 μg of both the INGMAT PCR product and pEBVHis-B vector. INGMAT was digested with Bam HI and Xho I simultaneously in a 30 μl volume. pEBVHis-B was digested with Bam HI and Xho I simultaneously in a 30 μl volume. Both digestion reactions were carried out at 37° C. for a period of 4 hours. After the reactions were completed, 400 ng of each was electrophoresed on a 1.5% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide to assure complete digestion. The remainder (˜2.1 μg) of both digestion reactions were passed over a sepharose G-50 column twice to remove the small DNA fragments followed by two equal volume phenol extractions. The extracted DNA was then precipitated with 2 volumes of ethanol and 1/10 volume 3M sodium acetate at −80° C. for 20 minutes, centrifuged, washed twice with 70% ethanol and dried under vacuum. The pellets were resuspended in 25 μl H2O and quantified.
The pEBVHis-B expression system was purchased from INVITROGEN Corp. San Diego, Calif.
INGMAT (Bam HI/Xho I) and pEBVHis-B(Bam HI/Xho I) have compatible ends suitable for ligation.
Ligation conditions using a 20:1 insert to vector molar ratio.
pEBVHis-B(vector) 62 ng
1 μl
INGMAT (insert) 80 ng
4 μl
10 × ligation buffer
1 μl
10 mM rATP
1 μl
T4 Ligase 4u
1 μl
H2O
2 μl
final volume =
10 μl
The ligation reactions were conducted at 12° C. for 16 hours.
We removed 5 μl of the ligation reaction into 100 μl of competent INVαF′ cells, (INVαF′ cells were purchased from Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif.) with 0.5 μl of 500 mM β-mercaptoethanol and incubated on ice for 30 minutes, heat shocked for 45 seconds at 42° C., and recovered on ice for 2 minutes. Then we added 1 ml of prewarmed SOC media and incubated at 37° C. with shaking at 225 rpm for 1 hour followed by plating all the transformation reaction on LB broth agar plates containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin.
Six colonies were picked and grown up in LB broth with ampicillin. DNA was isolated from the small cultures using alkaline lysis extraction procedures, phenol extracted, precipitated, dried, and resuspended in 50 μl H2O. Small aliquots of each of the isolated DNA were digested with Bam HI and Xho I to release insert. The digested DNA was run on 1.5% agarose gel and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide.
Several of the transformants that demonstrated the plasmid with inserts of the correct size were stored in 50% glycerol at −80° C. Large plasmid DNA stocks were isolated from 250 ml LB overnight cultures for use in COS-7 cell transfections.
The eukaryotic cell transfection was carried out according to method described by Chen and Okayama “High-Efficiency Transformation of Mammalian Cells by Plasmid DNA”, Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 7, No. 8, August 1987, p 2745-2752).
COS-7 cells (SV40 transformed African green monkey kidney cells) were grown on twenty 150 mm diameter plates in culture medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagles medium, 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin/streptomycin) to 80% confluency.
Each plate was washed twice with 10 mls of PBS, and 25 mls of fresh culture medium added. The DNA transfection mixture (2.5 ml) was added dropwise to each plate, swirled gently, and incubated overnight at 37° C.
DNA transfection mixture:
pEBVHis-INGMAT 60 ng
0.080 ml
H2O
1.045 ml
2.5 M CaCl2
0.125 ml
2XBES
1.25 ml
Final volume =
2.5 ml
The transfection media was removed from the plates. The plates were then washed 3 times with culture medium, replenished with 25 ml of culture media, and incubated for 48 hrs. The plates were washed twice with PBS and trypsinized. The trypsinized cells were collected from groups of 5 plates, pelleted, and frozen with liquid nitrogen.
This example describes denaturing metal affinity protein chromatography isolation of his tagged-INGAP protein without signal peptide. (Procedure for 2 cell pellets from five 150 mm plates each of pEBVHis-INGMAT transfected COS-7 cells).
Place 5 ml of the 50% slurry into a disposable 50 ml centrifuge tube. Centrifuge for 2 minutes at 800×g and discard the supernatant. Add 42 ml of sterile water, resuspend the resin. Centrifuge for 2 minutes at 800×G and discard the supernatant. Add 42 ml of sterile water, resuspend the resin. Centrifuge for 2 minutes at 800×G and discard the supernatant. Add 42 ml of binding/lysis buffer A (6M Guanidine HCl, 0.1M sodium phosphate, 0.01M Tris, pH 8.0) and resuspend the resin. Centrifuge for 2 minutes at 800×G and discard the supernatant. Add 42 ml of binding/lysis buffer A (6M Guanidine HCL, 0.1M sodium phosphate, 0.01M Tris, pH 8.0) and resuspend the resin. Centrifuge for 2 minutes at 800×G and discard the supernatant. Add 42 ml of binding/lysis buffer A (6M Guanidine HCL, 0.1M sodium phosphate, 0.01M Tris, pH 8.0) and resuspend the resin. Centrifuge for 2 minutes at 800×G and discard the supernatant. Bring the total volume up to 5 ml with buffer A. The slurry is now ready for the application of the transfected COS-7 cell extract.
Resuspend the transfected cell pellets in 2.5 ml of lysis buffer A. (6M Guanidine HCL, 0.1M sodium phosphate, 0.01M Tris, pH 8.0). Combine two resuspensions into one for a final volume of 5 ml. The lysed cells were passed through an 18-gauge needle 4 times, transferred to a 15 ml centrifuge tube, and centrifuged for 15 minutes at 10,000×G. The supernatant was collected and 5 ml of prepared Ni2+ NTA was added. The mixture was rotated for 45 minutes. The slurry was loaded onto a 1.6 cm diameter column and allowed to flow through by gravity.
Flow through 30 ml of buffer A. (No need to collect.) Flow through 30 ml of buffer B (8M Urea, 0.1M Sodium phosphate, 0.01M Tris, pH 8.0). (No need to collect.) but A280 should be at or near zero before continuing, if not, then wash with more. Wash through 20 ml of buffer C, same as B but pH 6.3. Collect 3 ml fractions. Wash through 20 ml of buffer D, same as B but pH 5.9. Collect 3 ml fractions.
Wash through 20 ml of buffer E, same as B but pH 4.5. Collect 3 ml fractions. At this point the protein should be in one of the fractions taken. Read the absorbance at 280 of all the fractions to discern where the protein is. Fractions containing the protein were pooled, concentrated, and analyzed by Western blot to confirm identity of the protein.
This example describes an analytical technique confirming the identity of the product.
The ability of the expressed protein to stimulate cell proliferation was tested on ARIP cells. These cells exhibited a 50% increase in 3H-TdR incorporation, at doses of the protein of 10-100 ng/ml.
In summary, we have been able to express INGAP protein in an eukaryotic system by excluding the 5′UTR and the signal peptide. The resultant protein is of the predicted molecular size of INGAP monomer and reacts with antibody to INGAP in a Western analysis. The protein shares with INGAP peptide the ability to induce ductal cell proliferation.
Vinik, Aaron I., Pittenger, Gary L., Rafaeloff-Phail, Ronit, Barlow, Scott W.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 8012928, | Dec 19 2008 | The Research Foundation of State University of New York | Truncated PAP2 and methods of making and using same |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 4439521, | Oct 21 1981 | NEUROTECH S A | Method for producing self-reproducing mammalian pancreatic islet-like structures |
| 4935000, | Apr 03 1986 | East Carolina University | Extracellular matrix induction method to produce pancreatic islet tissue |
| 4965188, | Mar 28 1985 | Roche Molecular Systems, Inc | Process for amplifying, detecting, and/or cloning nucleic acid sequences using a thermostable enzyme |
| EP383453, | |||
| WO9116428, | |||
| WO9626215, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Sep 08 2000 | Eastern Virginia Medical School of the Medical College of Hampton | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Mar 08 2010 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Oct 17 2009 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 17 2010 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 17 2010 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Oct 17 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Oct 17 2013 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 17 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 17 2014 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Oct 17 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Oct 17 2017 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 17 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 17 2018 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Oct 17 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |