A laminate wall structure which can be used as an exterior wall in manufactured housing and site built construction is made up of a low density layer having a density of from about one-half pound to three pounds per cubic foot, a second, reinforcing layer laminated to the low density layer and, optionally, a cellulosic layer laminated to the second, reinforcing layer. The low density layer is preferably a foamed polymer layer, the second, reinforcing layer is a polymer fabric, a biaxially oriented polymeric film or a fiberglass reinforced material and the cellulosic layer can be impregnated with an adhesive and/or resin in order to strengthen the laminate structure. This laminate wall structure has a low weight and yet is strong enough to meet wind zone wall diaphragm requirements for housing construction.
|
1. In a wall structure that is contained in a building structure exposed to transverse wind loading, the improvement comprising said wall structure containing a first layer comprising a foamed material having a density of about 0.5-3 lb./ft.3 and a second, reinforcing layer of a woven polymer fabric directly bonded to the first layer, said wall structure meeting the Ultimate load Test criteria set forth in 24 c.F.R § 3280.401(b).
0. 40. In a wall structure that is contained in a building structure exposed to transverse wind loading, the improvement comprising said wall structure containing a first layer comprising a foamed material having a density of about 0.5-3 lb./ft.3 and a second, reinforcing layer of a woven polymer fabric directly bonded to the first layer through the use of an adhesive, said wall structure meeting the Ultimate load Test criteria set forth in 24 c.F.R § 3280.401(b) #24# .
0. 46. A laminate wall structure for use in wall sheathing applications in manufactured housing and site built construction, the laminate wall structure comprising:
a first layer comprising a foamed plastic material having a density of about 0.5-3 lb/ft.3, and
a second, reinforcing layer of a woven polymer fabric directly bonded to the first layer,
#24# wherein said laminate wall structure meets the Ultimate load Test criteria set forth in 24 c.F.R. §3280.401(b) for a design wind load of ±46 PSF. 20. In a wall structure that is contained in a building structure exposed to transverse wind loading, the improvement comprising said wall structure containing a first layer comprising a foamed material having a density of about 0.5-3 lb./ft.3, a second, reinforcing layer selected from the group consisting of a polymer fabric and a biaxially oriented polymeric film directly bonded to the first layer and a cellulosic layer selected from the group consisting of paper, paper fiberboard, plastic-coated paper and plastic-coated paper fiberboard laminated to the second, reinforcing layer, said wall structure meeting the Ultimate load Test criteria set forth in 24 c.F.R § 3280.401(b). #24#
2. The wall structure of
4. The wall structure of
7. The wall structure of
8. The wall structure of
9. The wall structure of
10. The wall structure of
0. 11. The wall structure of
13. The wall structure of
0. 14. The wall structure of
15. The wall structure of
16. The wall structure of
0. 17. The wall structure of
18. The wall structure of
0. 19. The wall structure of
21. The wall structure of
0. 22. The wall structure of
25. The wall structure of
26. The wall structure of
27. The wall structure of
28. The wall structure of
0. 30. The wall structure of
0. 31. The wall structure of
33. The wall structure of
36. The wall structure of
37. The wall structure of
0. 39. The wall structure of
0. 41. The wall structure of
0. 42. The wall structure of
0. 43. The wall structure of
0. 44. The wall structure of
0. 45. The wall structure of
0. 47. The laminate wall structure according to
0. 48. The laminate wall structure according to
0. 49. The laminate wall structure according to
0. 50. The laminate wall structure according to
0. 51. The laminate wall structure according to
0. 52. The laminate wall structure according to
a cellulosic layer selected from the group consisting of paper, paper fiberboard, plastic-coated paper and plastic-coated paper fiberboard laminated to the second, reinforcing layer.
0. 53. The laminate wall structure according to
a cellulosic layer selected from the group consisting of paper, paper fiberboard, plastic-covered paper and plastic-coated paper fiberboard laminated to the second, reinforcing layer.
0. 54. The wall structure of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This application is a reissue application of U.S. Ser. No. 08/982,559, filed Dec. 2, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,656,858, issued on Dec. 2, 2003.
This invention relates to a laminate wall structure which can be used in wall sheathing applications. The inventive laminate wall structure is lightweight, easy to fabricate and yet meets governmental wind load wall diaphragm requirements for manufactured housing for transverse wind loading.
Wall structures for homes and buildings in addition to having minimum mechanical strength and moisture resistance, have to be able to meet government regulations with respect to transverse wind loading. Conventional materials used in exterior wall structures are plywood, orientated strand board, fiberboard and a wall structure made of several layers of Kraft paper compressed and adhered together to form a panel. These conventional wall materials tend to be expensive, have a poor moisture resistance, are heavy and difficult to install.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,082,882 discloses a fiberglass reinforced plywood structural sandwich for use as a truck, trailer, van or inter modal container wall which is made up of a fiberglass reinforced plywood plastic unit having one or both facings in the form of a sheet or film of a-high-impact, weather-resistant, low-haze, non-brittle, substantially non-porous acrylic composition.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,418,108 discloses a composite roofing panel made of a fibrous glass board, a layer of foamed-in-place plastic foam and a perforated sheet disposed between the board and the plastic foam. This sheet is made of a material such as paper, wax paper, or a thermoplastic film.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,425,396 discloses an insulated panel made up of a rigid foam layer of a synthetic organic polymeric foam, a protective weathering layer of a thermoplastic sheet material and a flexible backer layer of stereoreticulate material provided between the foam and the weathering layers.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,053,265 discloses a moisture-impervious panel having an intermediate layer of a water-swellable colloidal clay sandwiched between two layers of sheet material such as woven or nonwoven fabric or paperboard.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,088,805 shows a reinforced thermoplastic foam sheet made up of outer layers of low density thermoplastic foam and a thermoplastic film and a central layer having a reinforcing net or net-like structure.
However, to date, there does not exist a lightweight laminate which can be used in exterior wall construction and is inexpensive, easy to install, has a high moisture resistance and meets government requirements with respect to transverse wind-loading. The present invention was arrived at in order to satisfy these needs.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a wall laminate structure which is lightweight, easy to install, inexpensive, has a high moisture resistance and meets building code requirements with respect to transverse wind loading.
This and other objects of the present invention are accomplished by providing a laminate wall structure made up of a first low density layer having a density of from about 0.5 to 3 pounds per cubic foot and a second, reinforcing layer comprising a polymeric fabric, a biaxially oriented polymeric film or a fiberglass reinforced paper or plastic material laminated to the first layer. In another embodiment of the present invention, a third layer comprising a cellulosic material is laminated to the second, reinforcing layer.
The low density layer 11 can be made of a foamed plastic material or low density fiberboard. As to the foamed plastic material, polystyrene, polyurethane or a urethane derivative is particularly suitable while the fiberboard can be made of cane fiber, wood fiber or cellulosic fiber.
The polymer fabric layer 12 is preferably made of a thermoplastic material such as a polyester or a polyolefin. As to the polyolefin, polyethylene and polypropylene are particularly preferred, with polypropylene being the most preferred material. An example of the polymer fabric material 12 is Darco® by National Shelter Products. The polymer fabric layer 12 can be woven or unwoven.
The biaxially oriented polymeric film 12 is made of a thermoplastic material such as a polyolefin or a polyester. The polyolefin is preferably polyethylene or polypropylene. A suitable biaxially oriented polymeric. film 12 for use in the present invention is Interpluse® manufactured by Inteplast of Livingston, N.J.
As the fiberglass reinforced paper material 12, any suitable paper material may be used as long as it possesses mechanical properties suitable for the purposes of the present invention. The fiberglass reinforced plastic material 12 can be any suitable thermoplastic material such as a polyolefin or a polyester. Particularly preferred polyolefins are polyethylene and polypropylene.
The cellulosic layer 15 provides additional stiffness to the wall laminate structure 10 and can be made of paper, paper fiberboard; plastic coated paper or plastic coated paper fiberboard. As to the paper, 40 pound Kraft paper is particularly preferred in the present invention. The Kraft paper can be provided with a one-half mil polyethylene coating on both sides thereof. As a coating for the fiberboard and the paper, polyethylene or polypropylene are used. The cellulosic layer 15 may be impregnated with an adhesive and/or a resin to improve the mechanical strength thereof. As to the adhesive or resin, a urethane, polyester, phenolic, epoxy, phenol-aralkyl and resorcinol resin can be used but the present invention is not limited thereto. Additionally, other additives such as plasticizers, flame retardants, lubricants and mineral fillers can be incorporated into the resin or adhesive in order to modify its properties.
If the cellulosic layer 15 is impregnated, it is preferably impregnated to a degree of from about 3 to 100% saturation. The preferred degree of impregnation is from about 25 to about 50%, with about 35%, being particularly preferred. The manner of applying the resin or adhesive to the cellulosic layer 15 is not critical as long as the layer is impregnated thereby. The resin or adhesive may be applied to the cellulosic layer 15 by coating the resin and/or adhesive on the layer using in-line rolls or the cellulosic layer 15 may be pulled through a bath of the resin and/or adhesive or the resin and/or adhesive can be sprayed on the surface of the cellulosic layer.
The low density layer 11, polymer fabric layer 12 and cellulosic layer 15 can be laminated together through the use of an adhesive or through heat and pressure bonding. If the cellulosic layer 15 is impregnated with a resin and/or adhesive, the polymer fabric layer 12 may be attached thereto and the resulting laminate subjected to pressure for a period of time necessary to adequately secure the polymer fabric layer 12 to the cellulosic layer 15. The low density layer 11 then may be bonded to the polymer fabric layer 12.
As shown in
Negative pressure tests were performed on exterior side walls according to the present invention in order to determine their suitability as wall structures for manufactured housing. Expanded polystyrene (EPS) foamboard with woven polyethylene (PE) fabric facing surfaces were attached to framing members with 1″×1½″×16 Ga. staples in accordance with Section 3280.401(b) of the Federal manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards (FMHCSS).
A. Materials
The 48″×90″ test sample was first assembled with 2×6 studs that were 88.50″ long. The 1×6 top and bottom plates were 48″ long. The sheathing material was placed on top of the framing members and fastened with staples as described above. The sheathing panels were oriented so the long side of the panels were parallel to the studs. The siding material was then placed on top of the sheathing material and fastened with staples as described above. The polyethylene sheeting (6 mil) was placed over the test fixture and between the wall framing and sheathing/siding materials. The polyethylene was carefully pleated both vertically and horizontally along the inside of the test fixture.
The test was conducted in accordance with the ultimate load test procedures in Section 3280.401(b) of the Federal Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards. An 11¼″ deep wood box was built 1″ wider than the test sample. The test sample was placed horizontally in the test fixture with the sheathed side facing down. The wall top and bottom plates were, securely fastened to the inside of the wood box. The wood box was then placed on a sealed steel table. The polyethylene sheathing was placed over the top of the test assembly (between the framing and the sheathing), and sealed to the table. This allows the entire surface of the wall to be exposed to the full negative loads. The polyethylene sheet was carefully pleated to prevent it from stretching too tight and picking up load as the wall deflects downward. If the pleating is not done, it may result in composite action between the polyethylene and the wall sample. The uniform load was applied by evacuating the air below the test specimen using a vacuum pump. The applied load was measured with a water manometer capable of reading in 0.1 inch increments. The load was applied in approximate ¼ design live load increments at 10 minute intervals until 1.25 times design load was reached. The load was then increased to 2.5 times design load or until failure occurred. The load in inches of water column was converted to pounds per square foot (psf) by using: 1 inch (of water column)=5.2 psf. Deflections were taken using dial indicators capable of reading in 0.001″ increments. The deflections were taken at the mid-points of the two center studs, and are for information purposes only.
A total of three (3) specimens were tested. The descriptions of ultimate loads and types of failures observed are as follows:
ULTIMATE
TEST
LOAD
MODE OF FAILURE
#1
117.5 (PSF)
Vinyl siding and EPS board pulled over staples.
#2
109.2 (PSF)
Vinyl siding and EPS board pulled over staples.
#3
119.1 (PSF)
Vinyl siding and EPS board pulled over staples.
The Average Ultimate Load = 115.3 PSF
The Required Horizontal Load = 38.0 PSF (For HUD Code Wind Zone II-Interior)
The Required Horizontal Load = 46.0 PSF (For HUD Code Wind Zone III-Interior)
The Allowable Horizontal Design Load is: (Average Ultimate Load)/(Safety Factor) = (115.3/2.5) = 46.2 PSF > 46.0 PSF
As such, the wall laminate structures of the present invention meet the governmental wind load wall diaphragm requirements.
Although a particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention has been disclosed in detail for illustrative purposes, it will be recognized in variations or modifications of the disclosed invention, including the use of equivalent components, lying within the scope of the present invention.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 11414865, | May 31 2012 | Huber Engineered Woods LLC | Insulated sheathing panel |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 2928456, | |||
| 3616020, | |||
| 3971867, | Jul 29 1974 | Decorative acoustical building panel | |
| 4011357, | Nov 14 1969 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Laminate of biaxially oriented polystyrene film and polystyrene foam |
| 4082882, | Aug 13 1975 | Delta Truck Body Company, Inc. | Fiberglass reinforced plywood structural sandwich with acrylic facing on one or both sides thereof |
| 4088805, | Apr 14 1975 | LEUCADIA, INC , A CORP OF NY ; LEUCADIA, INC , A CORP OF NEW YORK | Reinforced thermoplastic foam sheet |
| 4350730, | Oct 16 1981 | TENNECO FOAM PRODUCTS COMPANY | Plastic laminate |
| 4363848, | Jun 01 1981 | Standard Oil Company (Indiana) | Three layered foam-containing laminate suitable for use as an automobile headliner |
| 4418108, | Feb 08 1982 | Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation | Composite roofing panel |
| 4425396, | Sep 28 1982 | TREMCO INCORPORATED AN OHIO CORPORATION ; Tremco Incorporated | Insulative panel |
| 4486995, | Apr 05 1982 | MARTIN, RUSSELL J | Insulating panel |
| 4764238, | Aug 23 1985 | VOUGHT AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC | Energy absorbing foam-fabric laminate |
| 4780167, | Oct 23 1987 | Sorrento Engineering Corporation | Method of making polyimide foam structures of controlled density and increased rigidity |
| 5053265, | Feb 15 1990 | American Colloid Company | Moisture-imprevious panel capable of delayed hydration |
| 5098778, | Apr 24 1990 | General Electric Company | Plastic based laminates comprising outer fiber-reinforced thermoset sheets, lofted fiber-reinforced thermoplastic sheets and a foam core layer |
| 5451451, | Apr 24 1990 | General Electric Company | Plastic based laminates comprising a fiber reinforced plastic lofted core and outer parallel sheets of thermoset resin impregnated cotton liner paper |
| 5695870, | Apr 06 1995 | The Dow Chemical Company | Laminated foam insulation board of enhanced strength |
| 5863091, | Aug 06 1997 | National Shelter Products, Inc.; NATIONAL SHELTER PRODUCTS, INC | Vehicle floor assembly |
| 6119422, | Nov 07 1997 | Fin-Pan, Inc. | Impact resistant building panels |
| CA2214302, | |||
| CA741725, | |||
| GB1346780, | |||
| GB1348271, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Jul 23 2004 | National Shelter Products, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| May 24 2011 | M2552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity. |
| Mar 26 2015 | M2553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Yr, Small Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Aug 07 2010 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Feb 07 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Aug 07 2011 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Aug 07 2013 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Aug 07 2014 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Feb 07 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Aug 07 2015 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Aug 07 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Aug 07 2018 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Feb 07 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Aug 07 2019 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Aug 07 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |