A mouse controller includes a platform mounted on a base for a range of movement in a plane relative to the base of at least ½ inch (12.5 mm) in each of two different directions (preferably mutually perpendicular directions). A pair of flat, elongated coils (Lorentz voice coils) are mounted on the platform with their longitudinal axes extending one in each of the two directions. Each of the coils cooperates with at least one magnet fixed to the base. The sizes of the magnets and of the coils and the relative positions of the cooperating coils and magnets are made or their operation controlled so that, in the range of relative movement between the platform and base, preselected forces between the coils and the magnets may be generated by a control computer. Preferably the projected area of the field from each of the permanent magnets onto the coil with which it cooperates will be substantially constant regardless of the position of the platform within the range so that the same current is required to generate the same force anywhere within the range. The control computer is programmed to activate the coils to controllably apply forces to the platform and thereby to facilitate movement of the platform and feed back tactile sensations to the operator.
|
0. 58. A human-computer interface device for controlling a graphical cursor displayed by a host computer and for providing tactile feedback to a user in accordance with displayed interactions between said graphical cursor and other graphical objects displayed by said host computer, said interface device comprising:
a physical object to be moved by a user in two planar degrees of freedom;
one or more sensors that produce a locative signal responsive to and indicative of a position of said physical object in said two planar degrees of freedom;
a x-axis actuator that applies force to a hand of said user only along a z-axis degree of freedom when current is flowed through a portion of said z-axis actuator, said z-axis degree of freedom being different from and substantially perpendicular to said two planar degrees of freedom; and
a microprocessor separate from and in communication with said host computer, said microprocessor coupled to said one or more sensors and to said z-axis actuator, wherein said microprocessor receives desired force values from said host computer, said desired force values correlated with particular pointer locations displayed by said host computer, said microprocessor controlling current through said portion of said actuator in accordance with said desired force values.
0. 54. A method for controlling a force feedback interface device using a host computer, said force feedback interface device manipulated by a user, a display device coupled to said host computer displaying a graphical user interface including images and updating said graphical user interface in response to said manipulation of said force feedback interface device, said force feedback interface device conveying force feedback sensations to said user in response to said manipulations, said method comprising:
sending a position signal to said host computer, said position signal including information representative of a motion or position of a handle of said force feedback interface device in two planar degrees of freedom, said handle being physically manipulated by said user, wherein said host computer updates a location of a cursor within said graphical user interface in response to said position signal;
receiving a force value from said host computer with a microprocessor local to said force feedback interface device, said force value correlated with said location of said cursor; and
controlling a z-axis actuator in accordance with said received force value to provide a tactile sensation to said user that is correlated with said location of said cursor in said graphical user interface, said tactile sensation being applied to a hand of said user along a z-axis degree of freedom, said z-axis degree of freedom being different from and substantially perpendicular to said two planar degrees of freedom.
0. 36. A device for use in conjunction with a host computer including a computer display, said host computer displaying a graphical environment including a displayed graphical pointer controlled by a user, said device comprising:
a handle to be manipulated manually by said user in at least two planar degrees of freedom;
a z-axis actuator to generate a tactile sensation to be felt by said user, said z-axis actuator applying forces to a hand of said user only along a z-axis degree of freedom when current is flowed through a portion of said z-axis actuator, said z-axis degree of freedom being different from and substantially perpendicular to said at least two planar degrees of freedom;
a sensor that produces a locative signal responsive to and corresponding with a position or motion of said handle in said at least two planar degrees of freedom;
a button that produces a status signal in response to being pressed by said user; and
a control electronics local to said device and coupled to said sensor and said actuator and said button, said control electronics performing the following:
sending handle movement data and button data to said host computer over a communication bus such that said host computer can update a displayed pointer location in said displayed graphical environment,
receiving a force value from said host computer, said force value correlated with said updated displayed pointer location, and
controlling said z-axis actuator in accordance with said received force value so as to provide said tactile sensation to said user that is correlated with a location of said displayed graphical pointer displayed within said displayed graphical environment.
0. 19. An interface device for enabling a user to spatially navigate a displayed graphical menu with a displayed graphical pointer, said graphical menu having a plurality of menu elements, and for enabling said user to more easily select a menu element from said graphical menu be providing tactile feedback to said user when said graphical pointer is moved from a first menu element to a second menu element in said graphical menu, said interface device comprising:
(a) a handle to be manipulated manually by a user in at least two planar degrees of freedom;
(b) a z-axis actuator generating tactile sensations to be felt by said user, wherein said z-axis actuator applies forces to a user's hand only along a z-axis degree of freedom when current is flowed through a portion of said actuator, said z-axis degree of freedom being different from and substantially perpendicular to said two planar degrees of freedom;
(c) a sensor that produces a locative signal responsive to and corresponding with a motion of said handle in said at least two degrees of freedom;
(d) a button that produces a status signal in response to being pressed by said user; and
(e) an embedded microprocessor local to said interface device and coupled to said sensor, to said button, and to said actuator, said microprocessor performing:
sending handle movement data and button data to a host computer over a communication bus such that said host computer can update displayed pointer locations with respect to said displayed graphical menu,
receiving desired force values from said host computer, said desired force values correlated with particular pointer locations displayed by said host computer, and
controlling said z-axis actuator in accordance with said received desired force values so as to provide said tactile sensations to said user that are correlated with a location of said displayed graphical pointer displayed within said graphical menu.
0. 52. An interface device for use with a host computer displaying a graphical application on a display device, said host computer displaying, executing, and updating graphical objects in a graphical environment in response to user manipulation of said interface device and commanding force feedback sensations in response to said user manipulation and in coordination with said graphical objects, said graphical objects including a graphical pointer, said interface device comprising:
a physical object grasped and manipulatable by a user in two planar degees of freedom;
at least one z-axis actuator coupled to said physical object for receiving a force control signal and imparting forces along at least one degree of freedom of said physical object and in accordance with said force control signal, said forces applied along a z-axis degree of freedom that is different from and substantially perpendicular to said two planar degrees of freedom;
a sensor that detects motion of said physical object along said at least one degree of freedom and outputs signals relating to a position of said physical object;
a user-adjustable switch apparatus providing a state signal representing a state of said user-adjustable switch apparatus; and
a microprocessor local to said interface device, separate from said host computer, and coupled to said host computer, to said sensor, and to said switch apparatus, said microprocessor receiving
force values from said host computer, said force values correlated with particular locations of said graphical pointer in said graphical environment displayed by said host computer,
said state signal from said user-adjustable switch apparatus, and
said signals from said sensor,
said microprocessor executing a process in parallel with said displaying, executing, and updating graphical objects and providing said force control signal to said at least one z-axis actuator to impart said forces in accordance with said force values so as to provide tactile sensations to said user that are correlated with a location of said displayed graphical pointer.
0. 1. A controller comprising a base, a platform, means for mounting said platform for a range of movement in a plane in each of two different directions, a first magnetic force applying means including a first magnet means mounted on said base and a first cooperating magnetic force generating means mounted on and moveable with said platform in position to interact with said first magnet means, a second magnetic force applying means including a second magnet means mounted on said base and a second cooperating magnetic force generating means mounted on and moveable with said platform in a position to interact with said second magnet means, said first and said second magnet means being fixed relative to each other on said base and said first and said second cooperating magnet force generating means being fixed relative to each other on said platform, said first force applying means being positioned and constructed to controllably apply selected forces to said platform in one of said two different directions and said second force applying means being constructed and positioned to controllably apply selected forces to said platform in the other of said two different directions and control means to selectively control said first and said second force applying means to generate said selected forces.
0. 2. A controller as defined in
0. 3. A controller as defined in
0. 4. A controller as defined in
0. 5. A controller as defined in
0. 6. A controller as defined in
0. 7. A controller as defined in
0. 8. A controller as defined in
0. 9. A controller as defined in
0. 10. A controller as defined in
0. 11. A controller as defined in
0. 12. A controller as defined in
0. 13. A controller as defined in
0. 14. A controller as defined in
0. 15. A controller as defined in
0. 16. A controller as defined in
0. 17. A controller as defined in
0. 18. A controller as defined in
0. 20. An interface device as recited in
0. 21. An interface device as recited in
0. 22. An interface device as recited in
0. 23. An interface device as recited in
0. 24. An interface device as recited in
0. 25. An interface device as recited in
0. 26. An interface device as recited in
0. 27. An interface device as recited in
0. 28. An interface device as recited in
0. 29. An interface device as recited in
0. 30. An interface device as recited in
0. 31. An interface device as recited in
0. 32. An interface device as recited in
0. 33. An interface device as recited in
0. 34. An interface device as recited in
0. 35. An interface device as recited in
0. 37. A device as recited in
0. 38. A device as recited in
0. 39. A device as recited in
0. 40. A device as recited in
0. 41. A device as recited in
0. 42. A device as recited in
0. 43. A device as recited in
0. 44. A device as recited in
0. 45. A device as recited in
0. 46. A device as recited in
0. 47. A device as recited in
0. 48. A device as recited in
0. 49. A device as recited in
0. 50. A device as recited in
0. 51. A device as recited in
0. 53. The interface device as recited in
0. 55. A method as recited in
0. 56. A method as recited in
0. 57. A method as recited in
0. 59. An interface device as recited in
0. 60. An interface device as recited in
0. 61. An interface device as recited in
0. 62. An interface device as recited in
0. 63. An interface device as recited in
0. 64. An interface device as recited in
0. 65. An interface device as recited in
0. 66. An interface device as recited in
0. 67. An interface device as recited in
0. 68. An interface device as recited in
0. 69. An interface device as recited in
0. 70. An interface device as recited in
0. 71. An interface device as recited in
0. 72. An interface device as recited in
|
The present invention relates to a controller. More particularly the present invention relates to an electromagnetic system for the application of force feedback to the moveable platform of a controller.
The concept of applying force feedback to a manual controller has been advanced and in fact implemented.
An article entitled Computing with Feeling by Atkinson et al in Computers and Graphics, Volume II, 1977, pp. 97 to 103, describes providing a “touchy, feely” and “touchy, twisty” to the operator so that the operator has the feel of the actions taking place. These force feedback sensations were created for molecular designs and models, etc.
A paper entitled Artificial Reality with Force Feedback; Development of Desktop Virtual Space and Compact Master Manipulator in Siggraph, Dallas, Aug. 6-10, 1990. Iwata describes a force feedback system with a human interface for manipulation of mock ups of solid objects and a paper entitled Creating an Illusion of Feel; Control Issues and Force Display, Sep. 16, 1989 Ouh-Young et al. describes the use of force feedback to create an illusion of feel. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration in an Abstract publication NASA Technology Transfer Division-Force Feedback Control May 1990 describes the use of force feedback to repel the controller and create the illusion the cursor should not cross boundaries of images, or that the cursor is attracted toward a point and to guide the operators hand in following a straight line or even along a curve.
To advance further the feedback to the operator requires control of the element manipulated by the operator, e.g. the joystick.
U.S. PAT. NO. 3,919,691 issued Nov. 11, 1975 to Noel discloses gantry mounted platform movement which is controllable in two mutually perpendicular directions by electromagnetic motors and cable or belt drives to the gantry system to impede the movement of the control platform in the two mutually perpendicular directions.
U.S. PAT. NO. 4,868,549 issued Sep. 19, 1989 to Affinito et al applies brakes to a ball in two mutually perpendicular directions. The brakes are operated by a computer to provide force feedback means to resist motion of the mouse or cursor.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a control which permits the effective application of x, y (or z) force feedback to impede or direct movement of the hand control in the x,y (or z) direction.
Broadly the present invention relates to a controller comprising a base, a platform, means for mounting said platform for a range of movement in a plane of at least ½ inches (12.5 mm) in each of two different directions, a first magnetic force applying means including a first magnet means mounted on said base and a first cooperating magnetic force generating means mounted on and moveable with said platform in position to interact with said first magnet means, a second magnetic force applying means including a second magnet means mounted on said base and a second cooperating magnetic force generating means mounted on and moveable with said platform in a position to interact with said second magnet means, said first force applying means being positioned and constructed to controllably apply selected forces to said platform in one of said two directions and said second force applying means being constructed and positioned to controllable apply selected forces to said platform in the other of said two directions and control means to selectively control said first and said second force applying means to generate said selected forces.
Preferably said two directions will be mutually perpendicular.
Preferably said controller will further comprise a sensor means for sensing the position of said platform relative to said base.
More preferably said sensor means will comprise a transparent grid mounted on and moveable with said platform and a light source and a detector means fixed relative to said base in positions wherein light from said source passes through said grid and is detected by said detector means
Preferably said first cooperating magnet force generating means including a first coil means position to interact with said first magnet means when a current is applied to said first coil means, and said second magnetic force generating means including a second cooperating coil means in a position to interact with said second magnet means when a current is applied to said second coil means, said first magnet means and said first cooperating coil means of said first force applying means being shaped and positioned so that in any position of said platform within said range said coil may be controlled to apply said selected force between each of said first and second cooperating coil means and its respective magnet means and wherein said control means selectively applies current to said first and said second cooperating coil means to generate said selected forces.
It is also preferred that the projected area of a field generated by said first magnet means onto said first cooperating coil means is substantially constant so that the application of a selected current to said first cooperating coil means generates the same force between said first magnet means and said first cooperating coil means regardless of the position of said platform within said range of movement, said second magnet means and said second cooperating coil means of said second force applying means being shaped and positioned so that in any position of said platform within said range the projected area of a field generated by said second magnet means onto said second cooperating coil means is substantially constant so that the application of a selected current to said second cooperating coil means generates the same force between said second magnet means and said second cooperating coil means regardless of the position of said platform within said range.
Preferably said first cooperating coil means will comprise a first elongated substantially planar coil having its major axis extending substantially parallel to said plane and to one of said pair of mutually perpendicular directions and said second cooperating coil means will comprise a second elongated substantially planar coil having its major axis substantially parallel to said plane and said other of said mutually perpendicular directions.
Preferably said first magnet means and said second magnet means each will comprise a pair of permanent magnet means, one permanent magnet means of each said pair located on one side of its said cooperating coil means and the other permanent magnet means of each said pair of permanent magnet means located on the side of its said cooperating coil means opposite its respective said one permanent magnet means.
Preferably each said permanent magnet means is configured with with its magnetic poles facing in opposite directions and with their polar axes substantially parallel to the plane of said planar coils.
More preferably said polar axis of each said permanent magnet means is substantially parallel to said major axis of its respective cooperating planar coil.
Preferably said means for mounting will comprise gantry means
Further features, objects and advantages will be evident from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
The controller 10 illustrated in
A suitable controller or handle 18 having a push button switch 20 (used in a conventional manner of a typical mouse) is mounted on the platform 14.
The controller or handle 18 may also be provided with a tactile system which through movement of the tactile feedback element 22 may be used to apply pressure to the operator or used tin reverse to control an operation (as will be described hereinbelow).
The gantry 16 is more clearly indicated in the exploded view of FIG. 2. As illustrated it comprises a pair of similar one degree of freedom sliding frame units 24 and 26. The first frame unit 24 consists of parallel mounting bars 28 and 30 fixed to the base 12 and a pair of parallel rods 32 and 34 extending between and perpendicular to the mounting 28 and 30. A pair of spaced substantially parallel bars 36 and 38 extend substantially to and are slidable mounted on the rods 32 and 34 via guiding aperture 40 and 42 to permit the bars 36 and 38 to slide therealong.
The bars 36 and 38 of the first frame element 24 are held in spaced relationship by a pair of end mounting bar 44 and 46 which act in the same manner as the bars 28 and 30 but to mount a second pair of parallel mounting rods 48 and 50 oriented substantially perpendicular to the rods 32 and 34.
These rods 48 and 50 mount a second pair of parallel bars 52 and 54 similar to the bars 36 and 38 and provided with guiding holes 56 and 58 for movement of the bars 52 and 54 along the rods 48 and 50 so that the second frame unit 26 slides in the direction perpendicular to the direction in which the first frame unit 24 slides. The platform 14 is mounted on the second frame 26, i.e. is fixed to the bar 52 and 54.
The exploded view of
Fixed to the top cover 13 is a suitable light source 62 which projects a beam of light 64 through the grid 60 onto a detector 66 fixed to the base 12. It will be evident that as the grid 60 is moved with the platform 14, each element (line) of the grid disrupts the light beam 64 as that element (line) traverses the beam 64. The disruption is sensed by the optical detector 66 which detects movements in the two mutually perpendicular directions.
The detector system or position detecting system described above may be replaced by any other suitable position detector.
The force applying actuators 70 or 72 (of
The stationary magnet assemblies 74 and 76 are each composed of a pair of permanent magnets 78 and 80 mounted on a return plate 82 which magnetically interconnects the magnet 78 and 80.
In the arrangement illustrated in
Each of the actuators 70 and 72 includes an actuator coil 90 (eg. a Lorentz voice coil) mounted on-with the platform in a position to cooperates with the magnet 74 and 76, of its respective actuator 70 and 72. The coil(s) 90 as schematically illustrated in
In a particular example of the actuator coil constructed as shown in
The width Wc of each side 87 and 89 on opposite sides of the core 91 of the wound coil 90 in the example shown in
The widths W and Wc and the width of the core 91 are coordinated to ensure that at all times the total projected area of the permanent magnets 78 and 80 onto the coil 90 remains constant over the range of movement of the coil 90 which is depicted by the dotted line 114.
The size of the coils 90 particularly their longitudinal axes have a significant influence on the range of movement of the platform 14 relative to the based. This range preferably will be at least ½ inch (12.5mm) in each of the two mutually perpendicular directions and preferably at least 1 inch (25mm) in each of those directions.
The width W of the permanent magnet 80 will be the same for each of the magnets 80 and for the magnets 78 and the spacing G therebetween will also be the same, but may be selected differently depending on how actuator coil 90 mounted on the platform 14 is constructed. The dimensions of the coil 90, i.e. width WC and length L as above indicated define the permitted movement of the platform 14. In the arrangement illustrated in
It will be apparent that in this position if the platform is moved in the directions of the 110 or 112 the same amount of one of the projected areas moves from overlapping with the coil 90 into the core space 91 that moves from the space 91 into the coil 90 and that movement in the axial direction of the coil 90 does not change the relative amount of area directly subjected to the magnetic field of the permanent magnets 78 and 80.
Thus a given current through the coil 90 in one direction develops the same force regardless of the position of the platform within its range of movement. If the platform is moved so that the projections 88 extend beyond the length L in either direction, the total force generated between the coil 90 and the magnets 74 and 76 will not remain constant.
For the illustration in
The width of the coil as indicated at Wc defines the amount of movement that can be accommodated in the direction of the arrows 110 and 112 while maintaining the constant force application for a given current. In the
Wc(MAX)=W+G
as if this width is exceeded movement of the platform in the directions 110 or 112 might result in more projected area of the magnets 78 and 80 onto the coil 90.
In operation with a given current i in the conductor of the coil 90 with a differential element length d1, a differential force dF will be exerted on the conductor when crossed by the magnetic field B generated by the magnet 74 and 76. The mathematical relationship is
dF=i dl×B.
By integrating over the portions of the coil 90 that intersect the effective flux areas of the permanent magnets 74 and 76, a total force F is seen to act along one axis with its orientation dictated by the direction of the current. It follows that the x and y direction actuation forces on the coil 90 can be controlled by two independent, bi-directional currents. An embedded micro-controller 67 (see
After calculating the position of the platform 14, the micro-controller's control program also calculates any necessary feedback forces and causes their actuation by turning on current drivers that excite one or both of the x and/or y direction coils 90.
While it is preferred to construct the platform 14, coils 90 and permanent magnets 47 and 76 as above described so that anywhere within the normal range of movement of the platform 14 a given current to the coils 90 imparts the same force to the platform 14 in the selected direction, it is also possible to construct the coils 90 and magnets 74 and 76 so that the same projected area of the permanent magnets 74 and 76 onto the coils 90 does not occur throughout the complete range of movement of the platform 14 relative to the base 12 and to vary the current applied to the coils 90 based on the relative position of each of the coils 90 with its respective permanent magnets 74 and 76 so that the current will be adjusted to generate the desired force by applying a current that will obtain that desired force at that relative positioning of the coil 90 and its respective magnets 74 and 76. Depending on the shape and size of the coils 90 this may require active adjustment (for example on the basis of lookup tables) based on limited movements of the platform 14 relative to the base 12 and for that reason for previously described arrangement permitting the use of a constant current for a given force anywhere within the normal range of relatively movement between the platform 14 and the base 12 is preferred.
The mouse handle 18 is shown in exploded view in FIG. 6 and includes as above described an actuator button 20 and a tactile element 22. The button 20 actuates a micro switch 118 while the tactile element 22 is controlled by an E-core type magnet 122 with a coil as schematically indicated at 124.
The structure of the tactile element is more clearly shown in FIG. 7 and includes an E-core magnet 122 with a coil 124 wrapped around its inner leg which is positioned to cooperate with a permanent magnet 126 mounted on the tactile element 22.
A pair of springs 128 and 130 tend to hold the tactile element in its lower most position as illustrated i.e. closest to the core 122, however when the coil is activated the repulsion of the magnet 126 from the core 122 and the coil 124 is stronger than the tension in the springs 128 and 130 so that the tactile element moves upwardly away from the core 122 with the amount of movement being dependent on the current in the coil 124.
The position of the tactile element 22 is such that it contacts with the hand of the user and when activated applies pressure thereagainst, the pressure being proportional to the amount of current passing through the coil 124.
Other types of handles may be used if desired, for example, the control handle 131 in
In the event a controller for controlling three degrees of freedom is required, the handle 18 or 140 may be replaced by or modified to provide z axis control, for example instead of the tactile element 22 functioning as a tactile element it could be used as a z controller by providing a suitable position sensor to sense the position of the element 22 when it is displaced from a rest position or alternatively as a bi-stable switch for limited z direction control.
A z direction controller 142 is illustrated in FIG. 9. This controller 142 is fixed to the platform 14 enclosed by a top 13A replacing and similar to the top 13 but modified to accommodate the z direction controller 142.
In the embodiment illustrated in
The configuration of the coil 90 and of the permanent magnet 74 and 76 in
The z direction controller 142 is composed of a frame 144 which is fixed to the platform 14. Mounted to the frame 144 are parallel rods 146 and 148 fixed at their upper ends to the bar 150 and their bottom ends to the cross base 152. The rods 146 and 148 are perpendicular to the rods 32,34,36 and 38. A platform 154 on which is mounted a coil plate 156 similar to the coil plate 90 described hereinabove is slidable mounted on the rods 146 and 148 via bars 170 and 172 with suitable opening to receive the rods 146 and 148 (similar to the manner in which the platform 14 is mounted).
The coil plate 156 cooperates with a pair of permanent magnets 158 (only one shown) equivalent to the permanent magnets 74 and 76 described hereinabove.
An LED or other light source 160 projects light through encoding 162 which is provided with a plurality of uniformly spaced horizontal lines between which the light from the source 160 projects so that movement of these lines disrupts the light from the source 160. Light passing through the grid or encoder 162 is focused via lens 164 onto sensor or photo detector 166 which generates a signal substantially in the same manner as the encoder 66 and 67 for the platform 14.
The platform 154 is provided with a handle 168 moveable in the z direction on the rod 146 and 148 and is used to manipulate the platform 14.
Force feedback is applied to the handle 18, 140 or 168 is generated by programming a computer. For demonstration purposes the configuration shown in
A second computer 206 was connected to the mouse controller 202 and was used as a monitor for loading new code into memory on the controller board. A suitable power supply 210 provides power to the driver 212 for the controller 10.
The software is running on both the computers 200 and 208 so the responsibilities of the two units must be properly divided.
Preferably the mouse 202 will send movement and button status data to the computer 200 where software calculates the desired forces for that particular pointer location and sends that force information to the micro controller which in turn drives the coils 90, 124 and 156 as required. However, this requires a very high powered computer and therefore to simplify to permit operation with the equipment available the computer 200 responsibilities were limited to handling the usual x window events, process input to maintain graphic interface and to initiate a synchronous transmission of non-real time commands to the micro controller when necessary. The micro controller is given the responsibility of doing the mouse position sensing to control movement and the transmission of mouse status data to the host mouse port and at the same time respond to commands from the host 200 and store in memory the locations of icon, windows, buttons, etc. that are activated on the display and to interactively calculate the necessary feedback forces with respect to pointer or curser positions during control movements.
A. The mouse may be programmed to constrain the cursor for movement along a straight edge.
B. indicates a menu bar that may be programmed as kinaesthetically stable place when it is approached from below so that the user can move the pointer rapidly in the direction of the menu bar from below and when it reaches the menu bar force feedback applied to the control handle to stop the motion of the controller and thus of the pointer.
The menu bar itself may be provided with bi-stable tactile elements to indicate when the pointer moves from one menu item to the next.
C. indicates a vertical menu. In this system the mouse could be set to permit the pointer to move only vertically up or down the menu.
D. The scroll bar shown at D may be supplemented with force feedback applied to the arrow used for the scrolling process by allowing the user to move faster and be more carefree when trying to position the pointer over the arrow. This can be done by creating forces at the sides on the arrow that prevent the pointer from overshooting, i.e. it would impede the mouse as it moves across the arrow.
The force feedback system could be also be used to actuate the computer rather than the button or switch mounted on the handle EG.switch 20. The mouse would simulate a button press in its transmission to the computer whenever the force with which the user pushes against one of the sides of the arrow exceeds a threshold.
E. shows a thumb type scroll bar which is similar to the arrow type scroll bar and to which force feedback could be applied to form a stable position in the bar and prevent the pointer from overshooting and constrain the pointer from going beyond the thumb opening. After the pointer is in position within the thumb opening pressing the pointer against the top or bottom of the thumb opening, the thumb would follow the motion of the pointer.
Furthermore, as the thumb is moved a damping force could be added and the motion direction, giving the user feedback in the form of a viscous drag sensation and when the thumb has reached the limit of its range appropriate force could be applied to the handle.
F. Command Soft button manipulatable by movement of the pointer or curse to initiate command i.e. soft buttons that may be pressed by the pointer and the tactile sense of pressing a button transferred back to the controller handle so that the feel of pressing a button.
G. shows further examples of soft buttons that could be used in a manner similar to icons and incorporate in the software a force gravitational scheme to facilitate user arriving at the button.
H. shows tactile regions wherein examples of specific tools may be selected The use of a bi-stable tactile feedback system could be employed to make user selection of the desired tool more quick and accurate.
I. indicates a system wherein gravitational force may be applied to draw the cursor pointer to the icon when it comes within a certain preselected distance of the icon.
J. demonstrates a window boundary wherein force feedback would be designed to prevent the pointer or cursor from traversing such a boundary or apply force when the window is entered or exited.
It will be apparent that by programming, control of the power of the coils 90, 122 and 156 may be accomplished making it possible to apply any desired force feedback to the handle, i.e. the position of the handle corresponds with the position of the pointer which provides the necessary information to apply force feedback coordinated with the position of the pointer on the monitor.
The coils 90 throughout description have been defined as having their longitudinal axes mutually perpendicular which is the preferred arrangement, but it will be apparent with appropriate software modification it is possible to arrange the coils differently i.e. so their axes extend in different directions that are neither parallel nor perpendicular.
Having described the invention, modifications will be evident to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Salcudean, Septimiu Edmund, Kelley, Allan J.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10343545, | Jan 15 2016 | TRUMPET HOLDINGS, INC | Systems and methods for separating batteries |
10613629, | Mar 27 2015 | Chad, Laurendeau | System and method for force feedback interface devices |
9195307, | Jul 18 2011 | Continental Automotive GmbH | Operator control device |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3157853, | |||
3220121, | |||
3497668, | |||
3517446, | |||
3623064, | |||
3863098, | |||
3902687, | |||
3903614, | |||
3919691, | |||
4148014, | Apr 06 1977 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | System with joystick to control velocity vector of a display cursor |
4160508, | Aug 19 1977 | Controller arm for a remotely related slave arm | |
4199875, | Oct 26 1977 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Visibility effects generator |
4236325, | Dec 26 1978 | MICROFLITE SIMULATION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; AAI MICROFLITE SIMULATION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION | Simulator control loading inertia compensator |
4241519, | Jan 25 1979 | The Ohio State University Research Foundation | Flight simulator with spaced visuals |
4384338, | Dec 24 1980 | HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY NOW KNOWN AS HUGHES ELECTRONICS | Methods and apparatus for blending computer image generated features |
4398889, | Nov 07 1980 | Fokker B.V. | Flight simulator |
4414984, | Dec 19 1977 | Methods and apparatus for recording and or reproducing tactile sensations | |
4477043, | Dec 15 1982 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air | Biodynamic resistant control stick |
4513235, | Jan 22 1982 | British Aerospace Public Limited Company | Control apparatus |
4538035, | Feb 11 1983 | CAL-TRON CORPORATION, A CA CORP | Joystick occlusion gate control for video games |
4546347, | May 18 1981 | MSC TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Detector for electro-optical mouse |
4560983, | Sep 17 1982 | Ampex Corporation | Dynamically interactive responsive control device and system |
4581491, | May 04 1984 | Research Corporation; RESEARCH CORORPORATION, 405 LEXINGTON AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY 10174 A NY NOT FOR PROFIT CORP | Wearable tactile sensory aid providing information on voice pitch and intonation patterns |
4599070, | Jul 29 1981 | CONTROL INTERFACE CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORP | Aircraft simulator and simulated control system therefor |
4603284, | Jun 05 1984 | Staubli International AG | Control system for manipulator apparatus with resolved compliant motion control |
4604016, | Aug 03 1983 | Multi-dimensional force-torque hand controller having force feedback | |
4632341, | Feb 06 1985 | United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air Force | Stabilizing force feedback in bio-actuated control systems |
4692756, | Jul 04 1983 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Device for generating a 2-axis control signal |
4706294, | Jun 11 1985 | Alpine Electronics Inc. | Audio control device |
4708656, | Nov 11 1985 | Fokker B.V. | Simulator of mechanical properties of a steering system |
4712101, | Dec 04 1984 | CULVER, CRAIG F | Control mechanism for electronic apparatus |
4713007, | Oct 11 1985 | Aircraft controls simulator | |
4734685, | Jul 28 1983 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Position control apparatus |
4767923, | Aug 21 1985 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Hand-held image reading apparatus with position tracker |
4782327, | Jan 02 1985 | ALTRA, 1200 SKYLINE DR | Computer control |
4794384, | Sep 27 1984 | Xerox Corporation | Optical translator device |
4794392, | Feb 20 1987 | Motorola, Inc. | Vibrator alert device for a communication receiver |
4795296, | Nov 17 1986 | California Institute of Technology | Hand-held robot end effector controller having movement and force control |
4799055, | Apr 26 1984 | SYMBOLICS INC , A CORP OF MA | Optical Mouse |
4800721, | Feb 13 1987 | Caterpillar Inc.; Caterpillar Inc | Force feedback lever |
4823634, | Nov 03 1987 | Immersion Corporation | Multifunction tactile manipulatable control |
4861269, | Mar 30 1988 | Grumman Aerospace Corporation | Sidestick flight control simulator |
4868549, | May 18 1987 | International Business Machines Corporation | Feedback mouse |
4878183, | Jul 15 1987 | Photographic image data management system for a visual system | |
4879556, | Oct 27 1986 | Huka Developments B.V. | Joystick control unit using multiple substrates |
4891764, | Dec 06 1985 | Tensor Development Inc.; TENSOR DEVELOPMENT, INC , 4430 W 109TH PL , WESTMINSTER, COLORADO 80030 A CORP OF CO | Program controlled force measurement and control system |
4896554, | Nov 03 1987 | Immersion Corporation | Multifunction tactile manipulatable control |
4925312, | Mar 21 1988 | Staubli International AG | Robot control system having adaptive feedforward torque control for improved accuracy |
4930770, | Dec 01 1988 | Eccentrically loaded computerized positive/negative exercise machine | |
4934694, | Dec 06 1985 | Computer controlled exercise system | |
4935728, | Jan 02 1985 | Altra Corporation | Computer control |
4949119, | Jan 12 1989 | WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT INC | Gearshift for a vehicle simulator using computer controlled realistic real world forces |
4961038, | Oct 16 1989 | General Electric Company | Torque estimator for switched reluctance machines |
4983901, | Apr 21 1989 | Abbott Medical Optics Inc | Digital electronic foot control for medical apparatus and the like |
5007300, | Mar 03 1989 | United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority | Multi-axis hand controller |
5019761, | Feb 21 1989 | Force feedback control for backhoe | |
5022407, | Jan 24 1990 | Topical Testing, Inc. | Apparatus for automated tactile testing |
5035242, | Apr 16 1990 | AUDIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION, A CORP OF MA | Method and apparatus for sound responsive tactile stimulation of deaf individuals |
5038089, | Mar 23 1988 | The United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the | Synchronized computational architecture for generalized bilateral control of robot arms |
5044956, | Jan 12 1989 | WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT INC | Control device such as a steering wheel for video vehicle simulator with realistic feedback forces |
5065145, | Oct 06 1989 | Summagraphics Corporation | Method and apparatus for producing signals corresponding to the position of a cursor |
5076517, | Aug 14 1989 | United Technologies Corporation | Programmable, linear collective control system for a helicopter |
5078152, | Jun 23 1985 | Loredan Biomedical, Inc. | Method for diagnosis and/or training of proprioceptor feedback capabilities in a muscle and joint system of a human patient |
5086197, | Sep 17 1990 | Optical encoding method and device | |
5086296, | Dec 02 1987 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Signal generating device |
5095303, | Mar 27 1990 | Apple Inc | Six degree of freedom graphic object controller |
5103404, | Dec 06 1985 | TENSOR DEVELOPMENT, INC , A CORP OF CO | Feedback for a manipulator |
5107080, | Dec 01 1989 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology; MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, A CORP OF MA | Multiple degree of freedom damped hand controls |
5107262, | Oct 13 1988 | Ministere de la Culture, de la Communication, des Grands Travaux et du | Modular retroactive keyboard and a flat modular actuator |
5113179, | Mar 16 1990 | Advanced Gravis Computer Technology Ltd. | Switch joystick |
5116180, | Jul 18 1988 | Spar Aerospace Limited | Human-in-the-loop machine control loop |
5125077, | Nov 02 1983 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Method of formatting data from a mouse |
5142931, | Feb 14 1991 | Honeywell Inc. | 3 degree of freedom hand controller |
5146566, | May 29 1991 | IBM Corporation; INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION A CORPORATION OF NY | Input/output system for computer user interface using magnetic levitation |
5184319, | Feb 02 1990 | Virtual Technologies, INC | Force feedback and textures simulating interface device |
5185561, | Jul 23 1991 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Torque motor as a tactile feedback device in a computer system |
5186629, | Aug 22 1991 | International Business Machines Corporation; INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION A CORP OF NEW YORK | Virtual graphics display capable of presenting icons and windows to the blind computer user and method |
5193963, | Oct 31 1990 | AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN, AS REPRESENTED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NATIONAL NASA | Force reflecting hand controller |
5197003, | Aug 01 1990 | WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT INC | Gearshift for a vehicle simulator having a solenoid for imposing a resistance force |
5203563, | Mar 21 1991 | WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT INC | Shaker control device |
5209661, | Oct 29 1990 | SIMULATION AND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Motor control desired dynamic load of a simulating system and method |
5220260, | Oct 24 1991 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Actuator having electronically controllable tactile responsiveness |
5223776, | Dec 31 1990 | ER-WE-PA DAVIS-STANDARD GMBH | Six-degree virtual pivot controller |
5228356, | Nov 25 1991 | Variable effort joystick | |
5235868, | Oct 02 1991 | Immersion Corporation | Mechanism for generating control signals |
5237327, | Nov 19 1990 | Nissan Motor Company, Ltd | Remote commander |
5264768, | Oct 06 1992 | Honeywell, Inc. | Active hand controller feedback loop |
5275565, | May 23 1991 | WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT INC | Modular display simulator and method |
5286203, | Oct 07 1992 | REFLECTONE, INC | Simulating horizontal stabilizer trimming in an aircraft |
5296846, | Oct 15 1990 | National Biomedical Research Foundation | Three-dimensional cursor control device |
5296871, | Jul 27 1992 | Three-dimensional mouse with tactile feedback | |
5298890, | Apr 11 1990 | CINCEL COMMUNICATIONS CO LLC | Discontinuous movement system and method for mouse cursor |
5354162, | Feb 26 1991 | Rutgers University | Actuator system for providing force feedback to portable master support |
5366376, | May 22 1992 | WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT INC | Driver training system and method with performance data feedback |
5368484, | May 22 1992 | WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT INC | Vehicle simulator with realistic operating feedback |
5381080, | Feb 26 1992 | Continental Automotive GmbH | Control device |
5388992, | Jun 19 1991 | Audiological Engineering Corporation | Method and apparatus for tactile transduction of acoustic signals from television receivers |
5389865, | Dec 02 1992 | Immersion Corporation | Method and system for providing a tactile virtual reality and manipulator defining an interface device therefor |
5414337, | Oct 24 1991 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Actuator having electronically controllable tactile responsiveness |
5435729, | Oct 19 1990 | System Control Technolgoy Inc. | Motor control loading system |
5459382, | Dec 02 1992 | Immersion Corporation | Method and system for providing a tactile virtual reality and manipulator defining an interface device therefor |
5471571, | Dec 27 1991 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for setting a graphical object's position and orientation with viscous dragging |
5559412, | Oct 24 1991 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Actuator having electronically controllable tactile responsiveness |
5559432, | Feb 27 1992 | LOGUE SENSOR COMPANY | Joystick generating a polar coordinates signal utilizing a rotating magnetic field within a hollow toroid core |
5576727, | Jul 16 1993 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Electromechanical human-computer interface with force feedback |
5589828, | Mar 05 1992 | ANASCAPE, LTD | 6 Degrees of freedom controller with capability of tactile feedback |
5629594, | Dec 02 1992 | Immersion Corporation | Force feedback system |
5634794, | Oct 29 1990 | Systems Control Technology Inc. | Aircraft simulator and method |
5691898, | Sep 27 1995 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Safe and low cost computer peripherals with force feedback for consumer applications |
5696537, | Jun 20 1991 | Tandberg Data Storage AS | Mouse for data entry and control with control of ball friction force |
5701140, | Jul 12 1994 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Method and apparatus for providing a cursor control interface with force feedback |
5721566, | Mar 03 1995 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Method and apparatus for providing damping force feedback |
5734373, | Jul 16 1993 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Method and apparatus for controlling force feedback interface systems utilizing a host computer |
5739811, | Jul 16 1993 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Method and apparatus for controlling human-computer interface systems providing force feedback |
5757358, | Mar 31 1992 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | Method and apparatus for enhancing computer-user selection of computer-displayed objects through dynamic selection area and constant visual feedback |
5767839, | Jan 18 1995 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Method and apparatus for providing passive force feedback to human-computer interface systems |
5781172, | Dec 05 1990 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Data input device for use with a data processing apparatus and a data processing apparatus provided with such a device |
5805140, | Jul 16 1993 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | High bandwidth force feedback interface using voice coils and flexures |
5831408, | Dec 02 1992 | Immersion Corporation | Force feedback system |
5844392, | Dec 02 1992 | IMMERSION MEDICAL, INC | Haptic browsing |
5880714, | Jul 16 1993 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Three-dimensional cursor control interface with force feedback |
5889670, | Oct 24 1991 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Method and apparatus for tactilely responsive user interface |
5889672, | Oct 24 1991 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Tactiley responsive user interface device and method therefor |
5959613, | Dec 01 1995 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Method and apparatus for shaping force signals for a force feedback device |
5999168, | Sep 27 1995 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Haptic accelerator for force feedback computer peripherals |
6028593, | Dec 01 1995 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Method and apparatus for providing simulated physical interactions within computer generated environments |
6037927, | Jul 14 1994 | Immersion Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing force feedback to the user of an interactive computer simulation |
6046727, | Jul 16 1993 | Immersion Corporation | Three dimensional position sensing interface with force output |
6050718, | Mar 28 1996 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Method and apparatus for providing high bandwidth force feedback with improved actuator feel |
6057828, | Jan 18 1995 | Immersion Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing force sensations in virtual environments in accordance with host software |
6100874, | Nov 17 1995 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Force feedback mouse interface |
6104158, | Dec 02 1992 | Immersion Corporation | Force feedback system |
6166723, | Nov 17 1995 | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | Mouse interface device providing force feedback |
EP85518, | |||
EP265011, | |||
EP349086, | |||
EP607580, | |||
JP366990, | |||
JP492691, | |||
JP6210065, | |||
JP62194389, | |||
WO9200559, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 07 1999 | Immersion Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Nov 02 1999 | IMMERSION CORPORATION CALIFORNIA CORPORATION | IMMERSION CORPORATION DELAWARE CORPORATION | MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012607 | /0368 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Feb 04 2010 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
May 27 2011 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Nov 27 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 27 2012 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
May 27 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
May 27 2015 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Nov 27 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 27 2016 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
May 27 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
May 27 2019 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Nov 27 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 27 2020 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
May 27 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |