A class of fire suppressant compounds which have labile bromine atoms bound to atoms other than carbon have been discovered to be more effective at suppressing fires than Halon 1211 and Halon 1301. Moreover, this class of fire suppressant compounds hydrolyze or oxidize rapidly in the troposphere and as a consequence thereof, they have minimal ozone depletion potential.

Patent
   RE40651
Priority
Apr 17 1995
Filed
Jul 16 2004
Issued
Mar 10 2009
Expiry
Apr 17 2015
Assg.orig
Entity
unknown
3
56
EXPIRED
0. 32. A fire suppressant composition consisting essentially of PBr3 in a liquid state and a propellant combined with the PBr3 for propelling the composition to catalytically suppress a fire, wherein the composition has no ozone depletion potential.
0. 43. A fire suppressant composition consisting essentially of PBr3 in a liquid state and a propellant combined with the PBr3 for propelling the composition to an aircraft engine, such that sufficient bromine atoms are liberated from the composition to suppress a fire in the aircraft engine, wherein the composition has no ozone depletion potential.
1. A fire suppressant composition consisting essentially of: at least one brominated, non-carbon compound in a liquid state selected from the group consisting of PBr3POBr3, SOBr2, BrF3, BrF5, PBr5, TiBr4, SiBr4, IBr, CuBr, NOBr, BrF, and BBr3, which is combined with ; and a propellant combined with the compound for propelling the composition such that the ozone depletion potential of sufficient bromine atoms are liberated from the composition to suppress a fire, wherein the composition is less than 0.1 has no ozone depletion potential.
0. 2. The fire suppressant composition of claim 1 wherein ozone depletion potential is defined on a scale where the ozone depletion caused by CFl3 is 1.0.
3. A The fire suppressant composition consisting of at least one labile brominated compound selected from the group consisting of PBr3, POBr3, SOBr2, BrF3, BrF5, TiBr4, SiBr4, IBr, CuBr, NOBr, BrF, BBr3, and BrCl, which is combined with a of claim 1, wherein the propellant is selected from the group consisting of CO2, N2, and compressed airand HCFC-123 (CF3CCl2H) .
0. 4. The fire suppressant composition of claim 3 wherein ozone depletion potential of the propellant equals 0.016.
0. 5. The composition of claim 1 wherein said brominated compound is PBr3.
0. 6. The composition of claim 1 wherein said brominated compound is BBr3.
0. 7. The composition of claim 1 wherein the propellant is nonflammable.
0. 8. The composition of claim 7 wherein said brominated compound is PBr3.
0. 9. The composition of claim 7 wherein said brominated compound is BBr3.
0. 10. The composition of claim 1 wherein said brominated compound is not stable in, and said sufficient bromine atoms are liberated in, the presence of oxygen.
0. 11. The composition of claim 10 wherein said liberated bromine atoms are sufficient to catalytically suppress the fire.
0. 12. The composition of claim 1 wherein said brominated compound is not stable in, and said sufficient bromine atoms are liberated in, the presence of heat.
0. 13. The composition of claim 12 wherein said liberated bromine atoms are sufficient to catalytically suppress the fire.
0. 14. The composition of claim 1 wherein said brominated compound is not stable in, and said sufficient bromine atoms are liberated in, the presence of water.
0. 15. The composition of claim 14 wherein said liberated bromine atoms are sufficient to catalytically suppress the fire.
0. 16. The composition of claim 1 wherein the ratio of the volume of propellant to the volume of brominated compound is 7 to 2.
0. 17. The composition of claim 1 wherein the quantity of the composition required to suppress a fire is between 100 and 1000 times less than the quantity of CF3Br required to suppress the fire.
0. 18. The composition of claim 5 wherein said brominated compound is not stable in, and said sufficient bromine atoms are liberated in, the presence of oxygen.
0. 19. The composition of claim 18 wherein said liberated bromine atoms are sufficient to catalytically suppress the fire.
0. 20. The composition of claim 5 wherein said brominated compound is not stable in, and said sufficient bromine atoms are liberated in, the presence of heat.
0. 21. The composition of claim 20 wherein said liberated bromine atoms are sufficient to catalytically suppress the fire.
0. 22. The composition of claim 5 wherein said brominated compound is not stable in, and said sufficient bromine atoms are liberated in, the presence of water.
0. 23. The composition of claim 22 wherein said wherein said liberated bromine atoms are sufficient to catalytically suppress the fire.
0. 24. The composition of claim 5 wherein the ratio of the volume of propellant to the volume of brominated compound is 7 to 2.
0. 25. The composition of claim 24 wherein the quantity of the composition required to suppress a fire is between 100 and 1000 times less than the quantity of CF3Br required to extinguish the fire.
0. 26. The composition of claim 1 wherein the propellant is a non-flammable, pressurized gas.
0. 27. The composition of claim 1 wherein the propellant is a deflagrating, solid, gas-generating cartridge.
0. 28. The composition of claim 1 wherein the propellant is a pressurized liquid.
0. 29. The composition of claim 5 wherein the propellant is a non-flammable, pressurized gas.
0. 30. The composition of claim 5 wherein the propellant is a deflagrating, solid, gas-generating cartridge.
0. 31. The composition of claim 5 wherein the propellant is a pressurized liquid.
0. 33. The fire suppressant composition of claim 32, wherein the propellant is selected from the group consisting of CO2, N2, and compressed air.
0. 34. The composition of claim 32 wherein the propellant is nonflammable.
0. 35. The composition of claim 32 wherein the PBr3 is not stable in the presence of oxygen.
0. 36. The composition of claim 32 wherein the PBr3 is not stable in the presence of heat.
0. 37. The composition of claim 32 wherein the PBr3 is not stable in the presence of water.
0. 38. The composition of claim 32 wherein the ratio of the volume of propellant to the volume of PBr3 is 7 to 2.
0. 39. The composition of claim 32 wherein the quantity of the composition required to suppress a fire is between 100 and 1000 times less than the quantity of CF3Br required to suppress the fire.
0. 40. The composition of claim 32 wherein the propellant is a non-flammable pressurized gas.
0. 41. The composition of claim 32 wherein the propellant is a deflagrating, solid, gas-generating cartridge.
0. 42. The composition of claim 32 wherein the propellant is a pressurized liquid.
0. 44. The fire suppressant composition of claim 43, wherein the propellant is selected from the group consisting of CO2, N2, and compressed air.
0. 45. The composition of claim 43 wherein the propellant is nonflammable.
0. 46. The composition of claim 43 wherein the PBr3 is not stable in the presence of oxygen.
0. 47. The composition of claim 46 wherein said wherein said liberated bromine atoms are sufficient to catalytically suppress the fire.
0. 48. The composition of claim 43 wherein the PBr3 is not stable in the presence of heat.
0. 49. The composition of claim 48 wherein said wherein said liberated bromine atoms are sufficient to catalytically suppress the fire.
0. 50. The composition of claim 43 wherein the PBr3 is not stable in the presence of water.
0. 51. The composition of claim 50 wherein said wherein said liberated bromine atoms are sufficient to catalytically suppress the fire.
0. 52. The composition of claim 43 wherein the ratio of the volume of propellant to the volume of PBr3 is 7 to 2.
0. 53. The composition of claim 43 wherein the quantity of the composition required to suppress a fire is between 100 and 1000 times less than the quantity of CF3Br required to suppress the fire.
0. 54. The composition of claim 43 wherein the propellant is a non-flammable, pressurized gas.
0. 55. The composition of claim 43 wherein the propellant is a deflagrating, solid, gas-generating cartridge.
0. 56. The composition of claim 43 wherein the propellant is a pressurized liquid.

This invention was made with support by the U.S. Government. The Government may have certain rights in this invention.

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention generally relates to prevention and extinguishment of fires of combustible materials by utilizing a composition of matter group which is highly efficient and environmentally friendly. More particularly, the invention relates to prevention and extinguishment of fires of combustible materials by using a group of fire suppressants having labile bonds between bromine atoms and atoms other than carbon.

2. Description of the Prior Art

Fire suppression by halogenated alkanes is well-established in both the scientific literature and commercial practice as taught, for example, in R. G. Gann ed., Halogenated Fire Suppressants, ACS Symposium Series 16 (American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.) 1975. The two most widely used halogenated suppressants are Halon 1301 (CF3Br) and Halon 1211 (CF2ClBr). These compounds are very stable, so they survive long enough in the troposphere to be gradually transported to the stratosphere, where they are photolyzed by solar ultraviolet radiation to produce free radicals that catalyze ozone depletion as taught, for example, in J. G. Anderson, D. W. Toohey, and W. F. Brune, Science, 251, 39 (1991). Production of these materials has therefore been internationally prohibited after January, 1994 by the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. The problem is therefore to find fire suppression materials and methods which are at least as effective as Halon 1301 and Halon 1211 but which do not deplete the ozone layer.

Representative of the prior art directed to the use of fluorocarbons which have no chlorine or bromine in U.S. Pat. No. 5,236,611 (Shiflet). These fluorocarbons are slowly transported into the stratosphere, but the catalytic efficiency of fluorine is very much smaller than that of chlorine, bromine, or iodine.

Representative of the prior art directed to the use of hydrogenated halocarbons, which are less stable than Halon 1301 or Halon 1211 in the troposphere, are U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,084,190 (Fernandez), 5,135,054 (Nimitz et al.); 5,093,013 (Sprague); and 5,080,177 (Robin et al.). It is well known that Halons containing chlorine or bromine will suppress fires in smaller quantities than those which contain only fluorine. However, it is understood by people practiced in the art of combustion that the principal source of heat release in hydrocarbon combustion is oxidation of hydrogen atoms to form water vapor. Thus hydrogenated halocarbons are expected to act chemically both as fuels and as fire suppressants.

In accordance with the teachings of the present invention compositions of matter having labile bromine atoms bound to atoms other than carbon have been discovered to have improved fire suppressant properties and to be environmentally friendly. Compounds which release bromine atoms and are commonly used as brominating agents in organic synthesis such as phosphorous tribromide (PBr3), thionyl bromide (SOBr2), boron tribromide (BBr3), and the like are very efficient at extinguishing fires. Moreover, they hydrolyze or oxidize rapidly in the troposphere and consequently they have no stratospheric ozone depletion potential.

Additionally included in this class of fire suppressant compounds of labile bromine atoms bound to atoms other than carbon are silicon tetrabromide (SiBr4), titanium tetrabromide (TiBr4), iodine bromide (IBr), phosphorous oxybromide (POBr3), bromine trifluoride (BrF3), bromine pentafluoride (BrF5), N-bromosuccinimide (C4H4O2NBr) {the bromine is bound to nitrogen, not carbon}, nitrosyl bromide (NOBr), chlorine bromide (ClBr), and cuprous bromide (CuBr). These compounds are used as brominating agents in chemical synthesis as taught, for example, in the Merck Index, ninth edition, (Merck & Co., Rahway, N.J., 1976) or suffer thermal decomposition with liberation of bromine at temperatures less than 200 degrees centigrade.

Examples of non-labile bromine compositions are found in such high-melting, ionically bound salts as lithium bromide (LiBr, m.p. 547° C.), calcium bromide (CaBr2, m.p. 730° C.), or chromous bromide (CrBr2, m.p. 842° C.), and other bromine-containing compositions that are thermally and oxidatively stable according to criteria familiar to people practiced in the art of synthetic chemistry.

In order to extinguish fires with a composition having one or more compounds of the aforesaid class of fire suppressants, equipment for delivering the composition incorporates such factors as specific geometry, gas flow, and flame conditions. A method of delivery of a composition having one or more liquid compounds of the aforesaid class of fires suppressants may employ a nonflammable, pressurized gas to propel the composition through a nozzle to the flame. Another method of delivery of liquid compositions may employ a deflagrating solid, gas-generating cartridge, such as is found in automotive airbags, to propel a mist of liquid to the flame. A third method for delivery of liquid compositions may employ a pressurized liquid propellant such as liquid carbon dioxide or liquid argon to atomize and direct a mist of suppressant onto the flame. Other methods for propelling powders or slurries of solid materials of the aforesaid class may employ a deflagrating solid gas generating cartridge and a wider nozzle such as would be used for an ordinary shotgun cartridge. Other methods for propelling gaseous materials of the aforesaid class may employ mixtures with pressurized inert propellants to aid transport of suppressant to the flame.

The primary advantage of the use of the class of fire suppressants of this discovery is to extinguish fires more efficiently with smaller volumes and masses of extinguishant than existing fire suppressants, without depleting the stratospheric ozone layer. PBr3, POBr3, SOBr2, BBr3, and the like react rapidly with water vapor or liquid to produce mild acids which precipitate with normal rain and are ultimately neutralized in soils. The short lifetimes of these materials also reduce toxicity of the suppressants since their simple acid decomposition products pose no chronic risk to pH buffered, living organisms.

These and other advantages and attainments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the detailed description wherein there are described several embodiments of the invention.

In accordance with the teachings of the present invention a class of fire suppressants which have labile bromine atoms bound to atoms other than carbon are shown in Table I. These compounds are more effective at suppressing fire than Halon 1301 or Halon 1211 and have no ozone depletion potential.

The effectiveness of the class of suppressants described herein is a result of the relative ease with which bromine atoms are liberated in a flame environment. Halons 1301 and 1211 also liberate bromine atoms in a flame; however, the strength of the C—Br bond in these materials requires higher temperatures or longer interaction times than the compositions of matter described herein. The stability of the Halons against oxidation or hydrolysis in the troposphere is one indication of the stability of the C—Br bond. The compositions of matter described herein are not stable in the presence of water, oxygen, or heat, liberating bromine atoms under these conditions and thereby providing a catalyst for flame suppression.

Another indication of the stability of the C—Br bond is the measurement of its bond dissociation energy of 68 kilocalories per mole as taught by A. H. Sehon and M. Szwarc (Proceedings of the Royal Society (London), page 110, [1951]). This energy is larger than the bond energy of typical P—Br bonds (63 kcal/mole), I—Br bonds (43 kcal/mole), or S—Br bonds (52 kcal/mole) as taught by Streitweiser and Heathcock, Introduction to Organic Chemistry, (Macmillan:NY), 1976 and Cotton and Wilkinson, Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, (3rd ed. Wiley:NY), 1972. As is known to people practiced in the art of chemistry the interpretation of bond dissociation energies involves approximations based on the nature of the full molecular fragments (XYn) from which bromine is liberated according to the reaction:
YnX—Br→YnX+Br.
Thus lower average bond energies indicate the possibility of labile bonds in a group of materials, but further experimentation with specific materials is required to establish the lability of the bond compared with Halons.

TABLE I
Composition Phase % Br Comments
Pbr3 liquid 88 brominating agent
POBr3 liquid 83 brominating agent
SOBr3 liquid 77 brominating agent
BrF3 liquid 58 reactive solvent
BrF5 liquid 46 reactive solvent
FBr5 solid 92 brominating agent
TiBr4 solid 87 reacts with water
SiBr4 liquid 92 reacts with water
IBr solid 39 decomposes at 116° C.
CuBr solid 29 brominating agent
NOBr gas 73 brominating agent
BrF gas 81 boils at −20° C.
C4H4O2NBr solid 44.9 decomposes at 170° C.
BBr3 liquid 96 boils at 90° C.
BrCl gas 70 decomposes at 10° C.

In one embodiment of the invention liquid SOBr2 is introduced as an air-pressurized mist into a 500,000 Btu/hr fire resulting from kerosene flowing at a rate of 4 grams per second through a nozzle with cross-flowing compressed air to atomize the liquid into a fine mist. The fire is contained in a flame holder whose volume is approximately 8 liters and is further blown by an atmospheric cross-wind of 40 miles per hour. The fire is reproducibly and irreversibly extinguished with less than one gram of SOBr2 in less than 0.2 seconds as confirmed by videotape records of the experiments. The same fire is not reproducibly suppressed with aliquots of 25 grams of CF3Br added to the same location.

In another embodiment of the invention 0.2 cubic centimeters of PBr3 is mixed with 0.7 cubic centimeters of liquid carbon dioxide. The liquid CO2 propels the PBr3 through a valve and into the flame zone, generated as herein above described, as it is opened, irreversibly and completely extinguishing the flame in the presence of flowing fuel, air, and hot surfaces.

Extinguishment of a similar fire, with a hydrocarbon fuel burn rate of 12 grams per second, by Halon 1301 is taught by Alvarez in chapter 3 of Gann (ibid.) to require between 90 and 130 grams per second of CF3Br for suppression. Another example of a gasoline fire with similar heat output is taught by Ford in chapter 1 of Gann (ibid.) to require between 500 and 1500 grams of Halon 1301 for suppression. Another fire, in which 10 grams per second of jet fuel are burned in fast-flowing air at the Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory Engine Nacelle test facility (Wright-Patterson AFB, OH) requires between one and three kilograms of Halon 1301 for reproducible suppression. In each of these examples the quantity of Halon 1301 required to suppress a similar fire is between 100 and 1000 times greater than that required of the compositions of matter described herein above, of which SOBr2 and PBr3 are specific embodiments.

The labile bromine atoms and high proportion of bromine in the composition of matter listed in Table I provide a more efficient fire suppression formulation than the Halons, which typically have less bromine by weight (Halon 1301 and 1211 are 54% and 48% Br, respectively) and lesser proclivity for liberating bromine atoms when thermally or chemically activated in a combustion environment.

Methods for dispersing gas, liquid, or solid suppressants require designs based upon such factors as specific geometry of the locus of the fire, flow properties of the fire suppressants, and flame conditions of the fire. For example, fine mists of liquid are transported by fluid-dynamical drag forces along flow streamlines in the nacelle of an aircraft engine. The mists vaporize in hot zones, liberating bromine atoms by pyrolysis in precisely the regions where the heat released by combustion is most intense. Inasmuch as the drag coefficient is inversely proportional to the droplet diameter, as is known to people practiced in the art of fluid dynamics, there is a range of aerosol size distributions which most effectively deliver specific suppressants to specific fires. Another such factor for a gaseous composition is the mixing of suppressant flow with turbulent flames in a well-ventilated fire, which is affected by the delivery pressure, the nozzle contour and orientation, the mass-flow rate of the suppressant, and the fluid dynamical properties of the fire. Dispersing methods designed for suppressing fire in the nacelle of a jet engine differ from dispersing methods designed for suppressing fire in the engine compartment of a motor vehicle, the flu of a chimney, or the gas-handling manifold of a semiconductor processing clean-room.

Methods for preventing and extinguishing fires of jet fuel using a composition of matter class which is highly efficient and environmentally friendly is also disclosed by the present inventors in Final Technical Report FR-4021 (US Air Force Phase I SBIR Contract F33615-94-C-5005, November 1994).

Although preferred embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be understood that within the scope of this invention various changes may be made in the amount of fire suppressant, the composition of a fire suppressant mixture, and the method for dispersing fire suppressants which is generally stated consist of a class of fire suppressants and methods of dispersing such fire suppressants capable of carrying out the objects set forth as disclosed in the appended claims.

Haaland, Peter D., Huntington, John H.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10240230, Dec 18 2012 SEASTAR CHEMICALS INC. Process and method for in-situ dry cleaning of thin film deposition reactors and thin film layers
RE41557, Apr 17 1995 Cantor Fitzgerald Securities Labile bromine fire suppressants
RE41558, Apr 17 1995 Cantor Fitzgerald Securities Labile bromine fire suppressants
Patent Priority Assignee Title
2732410,
2791490,
2918125,
3076507,
3266674,
3372208,
3479286,
3637022,
3657030,
3663283,
3812239,
3903037,
3959741, Jun 09 1975 United Technologies Corporation Interhalogen based combustion-driven laser which provides continuous wave output lasing from dual species
3985689,
4022872, Nov 12 1975 PPG Industries, Inc. Process for preparing finely-divided refractory powders
4043950, Aug 27 1973 Process for the manufacture of plastic foams and flame-proofing foams characterized by the use of a carrier foam
4048290, Jan 28 1976 Cabot Corporation Process for the production of finely-divided metal and metalloid oxides
4125161, Apr 18 1977 PIPE RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC Chemical cutting apparatus and method for use in wells
4129513, Jul 09 1974 British Technology Group Limited Electric field responsive fluids
4241042, Jun 19 1978 Montedison S.p.A. Spherical titanium dioxide particles and process of manufacture
4250960, Apr 18 1977 PIPE RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC Chemical cutting apparatus
4292290, Apr 16 1980 Cabot Corporation Process for the production of finely-divided metal and metalloid oxides
4397977, Dec 22 1978 LAUREL INDUSTRIES, INC Tetrahalophthalates as flame retardant plasticizers for halogenated resins
4406797, Nov 03 1981 The United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the Fire extinguishant materials
4415029, Jul 23 1981 Gearhart Industries, Inc. Downhole well tool and anchoring assembly
4428430, Jan 13 1981 GEARHART INDUSTRIES, INC Chemical method and apparatus for perforating drill collars
4481119, Mar 11 1983 The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy Compositions for extinguishing titanium fires
4494601, Sep 14 1981 Gearhart Industries, Inc. Downhole chemical cutting tool
4619318, Sep 27 1984 Gearhart Industries, Inc. Chemical cutting method and apparatus
4819728, Sep 01 1987 ROBICHAUX, LEON A ; ROBICHAUX, LEON A , 201 DIVISION ST , HOUMA, LOUISIANA 70364 Pressure relief system for down hole chemical cutters
4822513, Nov 12 1984 DIVERSEY IP INTERNATIONAL BV Cleaning/disinfecting process and composition
4889187, Apr 25 1988 Terrell; Jamie Bryant; Terrell; Donna Pratt; TERREL, JAMIE B ; TERREL, DONNA P Multi-run chemical cutter and method
4949789, Sep 01 1987 ROBICHAUX, LEON A , 201 DIVISION ST , HOUMA, LOUISIANA 70364 Pressure relief system for down hole chemical cutters
4971146, Nov 23 1988 Downhole chemical cutting tool
5017525, Mar 25 1987 Imperial Chemical Industries PLC Production of ceramic materials and of precursor therefor
5055208, Jan 02 1991 Powsus, Inc. Fire extinguishing compositions
5080177, Jul 26 1990 Great Lakes Chemical Corporation Fire extinguishing methods utilizing 1-bromo-1,1,2,2-tetra-fluoroethane
5082575, Sep 26 1988 Shin-Etsu Handotai Company, Ltd. Method for fire-extinguishment on hardly extinguishable burning materials
5084190, Nov 14 1989 E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company Fire extinguishing composition and process
5093013, Dec 11 1989 Halocarbon Products Corporation Ozone friendly fire-extinguishing agents
5120689, Mar 27 1986 Imperial Chemical Industries PLC Coked product containing domains of oxides
5135054, Oct 05 1990 E I DU PNT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY Fire extinguishing agents for flooding applications
5165916, Oct 02 1989 Phillips Petroleum Company Method for producing carbide products
5219474, Nov 17 1989 Korea Institute of Science and Technology Liquid fire extinguishing composition
5236611, Oct 28 1991 E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company Mixtures of perfluoropropane and trifluoroethane
5287920, Jun 16 1992 Large head downhole chemical cutting tool
5320174, Jun 16 1992 Downhole chemical cutting tool and process
5444102, Mar 05 1993 IKON CORPORATION, NEVADA CORPORATION Fluoroiodocarbon blends as CFC and halon replacements
5491028, May 21 1993 Trustees of Boston University Enhanced adherence of diamond coatings
5520826, May 16 1994 The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy Flame extinguishing pyrotechnic and explosive composition
5562764, Jun 28 1994 E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company; E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY Process for preparing improved TIO2 by silicon halide addition
5573744, Nov 23 1993 HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS THE SUCCESSOR ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND COLLATERAL AGENT Method for enhancing production of titanium dioxide
955316,
JP569230,
SU981338,
WO9315794,
//////////////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jul 16 2004Eclipse Aviation Corporation(assignment on the face of the patent)
Oct 30 2006HAALAND, PETER D PHYRX LTD LIABILITY CO ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0185450189 pdf
Oct 30 2006HUNTINGTON, JOHNPHYRX LTD LIABILITY CO ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0185450189 pdf
Jun 01 2007HAALAND, PETEREclipse Aviation CorporationASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0193950483 pdf
Jun 01 2007PHYRX, LTD Eclipse Aviation CorporationASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0193950483 pdf
Dec 28 2007Eclipse Aviation CorporationThe Bank of New YorkGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES TRADEMARKS AND PATENTS0202990331 pdf
Dec 28 2007Eclipse Aviation CorporationThe Bank of New YorkGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS0202990220 pdf
Feb 15 2008The Bank of New YorkEclipse Aviation CorporationRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0205180395 pdf
Sep 02 2009ECLIPSE AEROSPACE, INC THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0233640720 pdf
Sep 02 2009ECLIPSE AEROSPACE, INC THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0233640639 pdf
Sep 04 2009Eclipse Aviation CorporationECLIPSE AEROSPACE, INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0232200472 pdf
Jul 20 2012ECLIPSE AEROSPACE, INC Wells Fargo Bank, National AssociationSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0286410549 pdf
Apr 20 2015ECLIPSE AEROSPACE, INC WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0354500910 pdf
Apr 20 2015Wells Fargo Bank, National AssociationWILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONASSIGNMENT OF PATENT AND TRADEMARK SECURITY AGREEMENT0354700074 pdf
Jul 08 2015WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONCRYSTAL FINANCIAL SBIC LPASSIGNMENT OF PATENT AND TRADEMARK SECURITY AGREEMENT0361060876 pdf
Nov 13 2017ECLIPSE AEROSPACE, INC Cantor Fitzgerald SecuritiesASSIGNMENT OF PATENT AND TRADEMARK SECURITY AGREEMENT0445120618 pdf
Nov 13 2017ECLIPSE AEROSPACE, INC Cantor Fitzgerald SecuritiesSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0441770821 pdf
Nov 13 2017CRYSTAL FINANCIAL SBIC LPCantor Fitzgerald SecuritiesASSIGNMENT OF PATENT AND TRADEMARK SECURITY AGREEMENT0445120618 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events


Date Maintenance Schedule
Mar 10 20124 years fee payment window open
Sep 10 20126 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Mar 10 2013patent expiry (for year 4)
Mar 10 20152 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Mar 10 20168 years fee payment window open
Sep 10 20166 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Mar 10 2017patent expiry (for year 8)
Mar 10 20192 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Mar 10 202012 years fee payment window open
Sep 10 20206 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Mar 10 2021patent expiry (for year 12)
Mar 10 20232 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)