This invention relates to parenteral and mucosal vaccines against diseases caused by intercellular pathogens using antigens encapsulated within a biodegradable-biocompatible microspheres(matrix).

Patent
   RE40786
Priority
Mar 16 1984
Filed
Jun 02 2000
Issued
Jun 23 2009
Expiry
Mar 16 2004
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
0
50
EXPIRED
1. An immunostimulating composition comprising encapsulating encapsulated microspheres comprised of (a) a biodegradable-biocompatible poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolideas poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) as the bulk matrix produced by a solvent evaporation process wherein the molecular weight of the copolymer is between 4,000 to 100,000 daltons and (b) an immunogenic substance consisting of a conformationally native subunit of chronic intracellular pathogen which, in the course of natural infection with that pathogen, is exposed to the host immune system on the surface of free pathogen and/or pathogen-infected cells.
2. The immunostimulating composition described in claim 1 wherein the immunogenic substance is an antigen and the antigen is pre-encapsulated into a conformationally stabilizing hydrophilic matrix consisting of an appropriate mono, di- or tri-saccharide or other carbohydrate susbstance substance by lyophilization prior to its final encapsulation into the PLG microsphere by a solvent extraction process employing acetonitrile as the polymer solvent, mineral oil as the emulsion's external phase, and heptane as the extractant.
3. The immunostimulating compositions composition described in claims claim 1 or 2 wherein the immunogenic substance is a native (oligomeric)HIV-1 envelope antigen that is conformationally stabilized by the polymer matrix and serves to elicit in animals the production of HIV specific cytotoxic T lumphocytes lymphocytes and antibodies preferentially reactive against native HIV-1 envelope antigen.
4. The immunostimulating compositions composition described in claim 3 wherein the amount of said immunogenic substance within the microcapsule comprises between 0.5% to 5.0% of the weight of said composition.
5. The immunostimulating compositions describe composition described in claim 4 wherein the relative ratio between the amount of the lactide:glycolide components of said matrix is within the range of 52:48 to 0:100.
6. The immunostimulating compositions composition described in claim 5 wherein the molecular weight of said copolymer is between 4,000 to 50,000 daltons.
7. A vaccine consisting of a blend of the immunostimulating compositions described in claims 5 or 6 composition of claim 5.
8. The immunostimulating compositions composition described in claim 5, employed as a parentally parenterally administered vaccine wherein the diameter size range of said vaccine microspheres lies between 1 nanometer and 20 microns.
9. The immunostimulating compositions composition described in claim 5, employed as a mucosal vaccine wherein the size of more than 50% (by volume) of said vaccine microspheres is between 5 microns to 10 microns in diameter.
10. A composition in accordance with claim 1 wherein the microspheres further contain a pharmaceutically-acceptable adjuvant.
11. A vaccine consisting of a blend of the immunostimulating compositions described in claims 5 or composition of claim 6.
12. The immunostimulating compositions composition described in claim 6 employed as a parentally parenterally administered vaccine wherein the diameter size range of said vaccine microspheres lies between 1 nanometer and 20 microns.
13. The immunostimulating compositions composition described in claim 7 employed as a parentally parenterally administered vaccine wherein the diameter size range of said vaccine microspheres lies between nanogram nanometer and 20 microns.
14. The immunostimulating compositions composition described in claim 6 employed as a mucosal vaccine wherein the size of more than 50% (by volume) of said vaccine microspheres is between 5 microns to 10 microns in diameter.

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/242,960, filed May 16, 1994, pending; which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/867,301 filed Apr. 10, 1992, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,417,986 which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/805,721 filed Nov. 21, 1991; now abandoned, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/690,485 filed Apr. 24, 1991, now abandoned; which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/521,945 filed May 11, 1990, now abandoned. Additionally, this application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/446,149 filed May 22, 1995, pending; which in turn is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 06,590,308 filed Mar. 16, 1984, now abandoned.

The invention descried herein may be manufactured, licensed and used by or for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties to us thereon.

This invention relates to parenteral and mucosal vaccines against diseases cause by intracellular pathogens using antigens encapsulated within biodegradable-biocompatible microspheres(matrix).

Most infections by viruses and other intracellular pathogens are countered in the human host by a combination of humoral (antibody) and cellular (lymphocyte and phagocyte) immune effectors. Although the precise identity of immune effectors capable of protecting the host against some chronic intracellular pathogens (e.g. HIV-1) remains unknown, attempts to develop preventive and therapeutic vaccines still focus on the induction of appropriate humoral and cellular immune responses. Furthermore, since most human viral pathogens (including HIV-1) are transmitted across mucosal surfaces, it is important that vaccines induce such responses locally (at the mucosal surface) as well as systemically and that they are durable for long-term protection.

The issues of durability and mucosal immunogenicity have been previously addressed by encapsulating vaccine antigens in appropriately-sized biodegradable, biocompatible microspheres made of lactide/glycolide copolymer (the same materials used in resorbable sutures). It has been shown that such microspheres can be made to release their load in a controlled manner over a prolonged period of time and can facilitate the interaction of their contents with the local immune system when administrated mucosally.

In the case of HIV-1 infection, there is insufficient information at this time regrading the virus and its interactions with the human immune system to permit the rational design of a preventive vaccine. However, it has been noted that many candidate HIV vaccines tested to date fail to elicit antibodies capable of neutralizing wild-type HIV-1 or binding to native HIV-1 proteins, fail to induce a substantial population of effector cells capable of destroying HIV-1-infected cells, and fail to induce significant responses at mucosal surfaces. A possible approach to overcoming these problems (applicable to both HIV-1 and other chronic intracellular pathogens) is to identify a native protein, accessible to the immune system on the surface of both free virus and infected cells, and present it to the immune system (systemic and mucosal) encapsulated in microspheres to protect and augment its immunogenicity.

FIG. 1 indicates wherein the molecular weight of the PLG is about 4,000 to 100,000 daltons and wherein the relative ratio between the lactide and glycolide component of the PLG is within the range of 52:48 to 0:100, and its use, as a vaccine, in the effective induction of antiviral immune responses comprising both virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and antibodies reactive against native viral antigens. In the practice of this invention, applicants found that when a complex (oligomeric) native envelope protein of HIV-1 was encapsulated in PLG microspheres, it retained its native antigenicity and function upon its release in vitro. Furthermore, when used as a vaccine in animals, this product elicited HIV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and antibodies reactive with native (oligomeric) HIV-1 envelope protein.

The following examples illustrate the invention:

Materials and Methods

Immunogens, Non-CD4-binding, baculo-expressed, recombinant gp 160IIIB (rgp 160) was obtained from MicroGeneSys (Meriden, Conn.). CD4-binding, oligomeric gp 160 CDC451 (o-gp 160) was obtained from Advanced BioScience Laboratories (Kensington, Md.).

Microencapsulation of immunogens: PLG microspheres ranging from 1 nanometer to 20 um in diameter and containing a 0.5 to 1.0% antigen core load were prepared by a solvent extractive method. 0.5 to 5.0% by weight antigen core load could also be used. The solvent extraction method involves dissolving the viral antigen and sucrose (1:4 ratio w:w) in 1 ml of deionized water. This solution is flash frozen and lyophilized. The resulting antigen-loaded sucrose particles are resuspended in acetonitrile and mixed into PLG copolymer dissolved in acetonitrile. This antigen-polymer mixture is then emulsifyed into heavy mineral oil, transferred into heptane and mixed for 30 min to extract the oil and acetonitrile from the nascent spheres. The spheres are harvested by centrifugation, washed three times in heptane and dried overnight under vacuum. Microsphere size was determined by both light and scanning electron microscopy. The antigen core load was determined by quantitative amino acid analysis of the microspheres following complete hydrolysis in 6N hydrochloric acid.

Analysis of immunogen spontaneously released from microspheres in vitro by binding to soluble CD4 and recognition by HIV-positive patient serum. PLG microspheres loaded with native (oligomeric) gp 160 were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4 (PBS), incubated at 37 C. for 3 h, and then at 4 C overnight. The microspheres were then sedimented by centrifugation (2 min at 200×g), the supernatants harvested, and the released gp 160 assayed for binding to CD4 and recognition by HIV-positive patient serum by surface plasmon resonance (described below). A sample of the stock protein used for microencapsulation was assayed for comparison.

Immunization of animals. HIV-seronegative, 8-10 week old NZW rabbits were immunized intramuscularly with rgp 160- or o-gp 160-loaded PLG microspheres suspended in PBS or with alum-adjuvanted rgp 160 in PBS. Groups receiving rgp 160-loaded microspheres (n=2) were primed with 50 ug of immunogen on day 0 and boosted with 25 ug on day 42. Groups receiving o-gp 160-loaded microspheres (n=3) were primed with 70 ug of immunogen on day 0 and boosted with 35 ug on day 56. Groups receiving alum-adjuvanted rgp 160 (n=2) got 85 ug of immunogen on days 0, 7, and 28.

BALB/c mice were immunized subcutaneously with rgp 160-loaded PLG microspheres suspend in PBS or with alum-adjuvanted rgp 160 in PBS. The mice in all groups (n=4) received 10 ug of immunogen on days 0 and 21.

Determination of the ratio of antibody binding to “native”/denatured rgp 120IIIB measured by surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Real-time binding interactions between ligand (gp 120 covalently linked to a biosensor matrix) and ligate (Abs in solution) were measured using surface plasmon resonance (BIAcore, Pharmacia Biosensor, Piscataway, N.J.). “Native”rgp 120(IIIB) (Genentech, South San Francisco, Calif.) or reduced, carboxymethylated (denatured) rgp 120(IIIB) (Genentech) was covalently linked to the biosensor dextran matrix. Sera and mAbs were diluted in HBS running buffer (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 3.4 mM EDTA, 0.05% (BIAcore) surfactant P20, pH 7.4) and injected through the dextran matrices at a flow rate of 5 ul/min. The binding value of each serum or mAb was measured in resonance units (RU), and the “native”/denatured gp 120 ratios were determined by dividing the corresponding RU values and correcting for small differences in matrix concentration. Control included an HIV-positive patient serum and mAb 1c1.

Assessment of HIV-specific cell-mediated immunity in immunized mice by secondary CTL assay. The spleens of BALB/c mice immunized on days 0 and 21 were harvested and single cell suspensions prepared aseptically in complete RPMI medium on day 35. The cells were then pooled within experimental groups (n=4), underlay with ficoll, centrifuged 30 min at 450×g (RT), washed, and resuspended in complete RPMI medium. Following a 1 h stimulation with peptide p18 (1 uM) at 37° C., the cell suspensions were diluted with complete RPMI supplemented with 2ME (1:1000) and transferred to flasks for a 6 day incubation at 37° C. After 2 days, recombinant IL-2 (10 u/ml) was added to all flasks. On day 6, P815 target cells were pulsed with peptide p18 (1 uM) or with nothing (control) in PBS supplemented with 0.1% BSA. 3×10A6 target cells were labelled with 300 uCi of 51Cr, washed, and plated out with the effector cells at effector:traget (E:T) ratios of 45:1, 15:1, 5:1, and 1.7:1. After a 6 h incubation at 37° C., the supernatants were harvested and counted, and % specific lysis was calculated.

Results

Comparison of the native (oligomeric) gp 160 prior to microencapsulation and following spontaneous release from PLG microspheres showed the two to be essentially indistinguishable in terms of their binding to CD4 and recognition by HIV-positive patient serum. (Table 1). This retention of conformation-dependent binding shows that structure of the antigen is not appreciably altered by the microencapsulation process.

FIG. 1 shows the data from a cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) assay performed on the speen cells of mice which had had been previously immunized with either HIV-1 envelope protein encapsulated in PLG microspheres (dark squares) or the same protein administered in a conventional way with alum adjuvant (dark diamonds). These data indicate that microencapsulation of HIV-1 envelope protein in PLG microspheres results in a vaccine that induces significantly greater anti-HIV CTL activity than does alum-adjuvanted vaccine. The open symbol groups represent controls run to assure that the activity being measured is virus-specific.

FIG. 2 shows the results of an assay designed to measure the relative binding of antibodies to native vs denatured viral protein. These data show that rabbits immunized with a non-native HIV-1 protein encapsulated in PLG (#5 and 6) develop antibodies which show greater binding to denatured (vs native) protein (indicated by a ratio<1). On the other hand, rabbits immunized with a native HIV-1 protein encapsulated in PLG microspheres (#10-12) develop antibodies which show greater binding to native viral protein (indicated by ratio>1). This retention of each proteins antigenicity constitutes an additional piece of evidence that the structure of antigens loaded in PLG microspheres are preserved.

Materials and Methods

This experiment was similar to that described in Example 1 except for the method of microencapsulation employed.

Microencapsulation of immunogens: PLG microspheres ranging from 1 to 15 um in diameter and containing a 0.5 to 1.0% antigen core load were prepared by a solvent evaporation method. The solvent evaporation method involves emulsifying the viral antigen dissolved in deionized water into poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) polymer dissolved in methylene chloride. This emulsion is mixed into 0.9% polyvinyl alcohol and stirred. After 10 min of stirring, 0.35 l of water is added and gentle mixing is continued for 1.5 h. The resulting spheres are harvested by centrifugation, washed three times in distilled water, and dried overnight under vacuum. Microsphere size was determined by both light and scanning electron microscopy. The antigen core load was determined by quantitative amino acid analysis of the microspheres following complete hydrolysis in 6N hydrochloric acid.

Results

Analysis of spontaneously released antigen showed it to retain its CD4 binding capacity. Its native antigenicity (recognition by the serum of an HIV-positive patient) was only slightly less than that of the antigen prior to encapsulation and following spontaneous release from microspheres produced by a solvent extraction method (Table 1).

The results of immunizing animals with either non-native (denatured) or native oligomeric gp 160 in PLG microspheres produced by a solvent evaporation method were essentially indistinguishable from those obtained using microspheres produced by a solvent extraction method (example 1). Microencapsulated antigen induced significantly greater CTL activity than antigen administered in a conventional alum-adjuvanted formulation. Furthermore, preservation of the structure of PLG-microencapsulated antigens is supported by the findings of preferential binding of antibodies elicited by microspheres loaded with denatured antigen to denatured gp 120 (FIGS. 2, 3, and 4) (FIG. 2, nos. 3 and 4) and the preferred binding of antibodies elicited by microspheres loaded with native (oligomeric) antigen to native gp 120 (FIGS. 2, 7-8) (FIG. 2, nos. 7 and 8).

TABLE 1
BIA (released o-gp160)
Capture o-gp160-451 (stock vs microsphere-released)
on tvc 391 fc3/fc4 sCD4 (4 mg/m)
1 ul/min flow rate foe o-gp160 ini.: 5 ul/min for all others
ligate RU HIV+/sCD4 (RU ratio)
gp120-MN 1:10 3286
HIV+ 1:100 54
NHS 1:100 3
HIV+ pool 1:100 47
o-gp160 (tvc281) 1772
HIV+ 3259 1.84
tvc281 1848
NHS −36
tvc281 1762
HIV+ pool 2597 1.47
tvc281-PLG-EV 3342
HIV+ 4594 1.37
tvc281 3222
NHS 7
tvc281 3210
HIV+ pool 3336 1.04
tvc281-PLG-EX 1855
HIV+ 3760 2.04
tvc281 1839
NHS 2
tvc281 1850
HIV+ pool 2745 1.48
gp120-MN 1:10 2914
HIV+ 1:100 14
NHS 1:100 −2
HIV+ pool 1:100 14
tvc281 1099
HIV+ 1083 0.99
tvc281 1022
HIV+ pool 1395 1.36
tvc281-PLG-EV 1595
HIV+ 1322 0.83
tvc281 1535
HIV+ pool 1781 1.16

In view of the above it will be seen that the objects of the invention are achieved. As various changes could be made in the above materials and methods without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description shall be interpreted as illustrative and not limiting.

Reid, Robert H., Setterstrom, Jean A., Burnett, Paul R., van Hamont, John E., Van Cott, Thomas C., Birx, Deborah L.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
3540444,
3773919,
3788315,
4166800, Aug 25 1977 Sandoz, Inc. Processes for preparation of microspheres
4384975, Jun 13 1980 Sandoz, Inc. Process for preparation of microspheres
4389330, Oct 06 1980 ALKERMES CONTROLLED THERAPEUTICS INC II Microencapsulation process
4530840, Jul 29 1982 ALKERMES CONTROLLED THERAPEUTICS INC II Injectable, long-acting microparticle formulation for the delivery of anti-inflammatory agents
4542025, Jul 29 1982 ALKERMES CONTROLLED THERAPEUTICS INC II Injectable, long-acting microparticle formulation for the delivery of anti-inflammatory agents
4585482, May 25 1984 Southern Research Institute Long-acting biocidal compositions and method therefor
4622244, Mar 07 1974 The Washington University Process for preparation of microcapsules
4637905, Mar 04 1982 Batelle Development Corporation; BATTELLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 505 KING AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH A DE CORP Process of preparing microcapsules of lactides or lactide copolymers with glycolides and/or ε-caprolactones
4675189, Dec 11 1981 Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc. Microencapsulation of water soluble active polypeptides
4798786, May 06 1982 Stolle Research and Development Corporation Living cells encapsulated in crosslinked protein
4835139, Sep 23 1983 Debiopharm S.A. Process for increasing the antagonistic effect of peptidic compounds on hormone-dependent diseases
4863735, Feb 19 1985 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, A CORP OF MA Biodegradable polymeric drug delivery system with adjuvant activity
4897268, Aug 03 1987 Southern Research Institute Drug delivery system and method of making the same
4938763, Oct 03 1988 ATRIX LABORATORIES, INC Biodegradable in-situ forming implants and methods of producing the same
4941880, Jun 19 1987 Bioject, Inc. Pre-filled ampule and non-invasive hypodermic injection device assembly
5000886, May 26 1987 American Cyanamid Company Silicone-hardened pharmaceutical microcapsules and process of making the same
5019096, Feb 11 1988 Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York; TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, THE, A EDUCATIONAL CORP OF NY Infection-resistant compositions, medical devices and surfaces and methods for preparing and using same
5059187, Nov 30 1988 Dey Laboratories, Inc. Method for the cleansing of wounds using an aerosol container having liquid wound cleansing solution
5064413, Nov 09 1989 BIOJECT INC Needleless hypodermic injection device
5075109, Oct 24 1986 Southern Research Institute; UAB Research Foundation, The Method of potentiating an immune response
5102872, Sep 20 1985 Chiron Corporation Controlled-release formulations of interleukin-2
5129825, Dec 21 1987 Dental syringe and capsule for use therewith
5133701, Apr 06 1989 Disposable pressure wound irrigation device
5236355, Dec 22 1988 American Cyanamid Company Apparatus for the treatment of periodontal disease
5278202, Apr 24 1990 ATRIX LABORATORIES, INC Biodegradable in-situ forming implants and methods of producing the same
5290494, Mar 05 1990 Board of Regents, The University of Texas System Process of making a resorbable implantation device
5360610, May 16 1990 BROOKWOOD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC Method for stimulating nerve fiber growth
5384133, Aug 11 1986 Innovata Biomed Limited Pharmaceutical formulations comprising microcapsules
5407609, May 04 1989 BROOKWOOD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC Microencapsulation process and products therefrom
5417986, Mar 16 1984 ARMY, UNITED STATES Vaccines against diseases caused by enteropathogenic organisms using antigens encapsulated within biodegradable-biocompatible microspheres
5429822, Mar 13 1992 Cambridge Scientific, Inc. Biodegradable bursting release system
5500228, May 26 1987 American Cyanamid Company Phase separation-microencapsulated pharmaceuticals compositions useful for alleviating dental disease
5538739, Jul 07 1989 Novartis AG Sustained release formulations of water soluble peptides
5639480, Jul 07 1989 Novartis AG Sustained release formulations of water soluble peptides
5643605, Oct 25 1993 Genentech, Inc. Methods and compositions for microencapsulation of adjuvants
5648096, Oct 26 1992 Schwarz Pharma AG Process for the production of microcapsules
5650173, Nov 19 1993 ALKERMES, INC Preparation of biodegradable microparticles containing a biologically active agent
5688530, Jul 07 1989 NOVARTIS AG SUCCESSOR TO SANDOZ LTD BY OPERATION OF SWISS LAW Sustained release formulations of water soluble peptides
5693343, Mar 16 1984 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY Microparticle carriers of maximal uptake capacity by both M cells and non-M cells
5762965, Mar 16 1984 ARMY, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF Vaccines against intracellular pathogens using antigens encapsulated within biodegradble-biocompatible microspheres
5811128, Mar 18 1988 Southern Research Institute; The UAB Research Foundation Method for oral or rectal delivery of microencapsulated vaccines and compositions therefor
5814344, Oct 24 1986 Southern Research Institute; The UAB Research Foundation Method for delivering bioactive agents into and through the mucosally associated lymphoid tissues and controlling their release
5820883, Oct 24 1986 Southern Research Institute; The UAB Research Foundation Method for delivering bioactive agents into and through the mucosally-associated lymphoid tissues and controlling their release
5853763, Oct 24 1986 Southern Research Institute; The UAB Research Foundation Method for delivering bioactive agents into and through the mucosally-associated lymphoid tissue and controlling their release
EP52510,
WO9222654,
WO9511010,
///////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jul 15 1996SETTERSTROM, JEAN A ARMY, UNITED STATESASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0222930134 pdf
Aug 07 1996VAN HAMONT, JOHN E ARMY, UNITED STATESASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0222930134 pdf
Aug 07 1996REID, ROBERT H ARMY, UNITED STATESASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0222930134 pdf
Aug 20 1996BURNETT, PAUL R ARMY, UNITED STATESASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0222930134 pdf
Aug 22 1996BIRX, DEBORAH L ARMY, UNITED STATESASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0222930134 pdf
Aug 23 1996VAN COTT, THOMAS C ARMY, UNITED STATESASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0222930134 pdf
Jun 02 2000The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jan 11 2010REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Jun 06 2010EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Jun 23 20124 years fee payment window open
Dec 23 20126 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jun 23 2013patent expiry (for year 4)
Jun 23 20152 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Jun 23 20168 years fee payment window open
Dec 23 20166 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jun 23 2017patent expiry (for year 8)
Jun 23 20192 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Jun 23 202012 years fee payment window open
Dec 23 20206 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jun 23 2021patent expiry (for year 12)
Jun 23 20232 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)