A satellite vehicle compensation system (100) predicts the motion of two satellite vehicles and enhances the predictions with real-time updates of one or both of the vehicles. Using feedback loops (132, 134), the differences between the prediction and the actual motions are looped back to improve the accuracy of the motion predictor. A communications system includes a first communications node and a second communications node. A transmission frequency and/or a receiving frequency is compensated based on a predicted relative motion between the first and second communications nodes. The predicted relative motion is based on a first signal that is representative of a predicted motion of the first communications node and a second signal that is representative of a predicted motion of the second communications node. Real-time information may be used to minimize an error between predicted and measured motions of the first and/or second communications node.
|
0. 15. A communications node, comprising:
a motion predictor configured to obtain a first signal representing a predicted motion of said node;
a data block configured to obtain a second signal representing an actual motion of said node;
an element configured to adjust said first signal based on a difference between said first and second signals; and
a processor configured to compute at least one of a compensated transmission frequency or a compensated receiving frequency based on a predicted relative motion between said node and a second communications node;
wherein said predicted relative motion is based on said first signal and a third signal that is representative of a predicted motion of said second communications node.
0. 9. A communications system that compensates a frequency associated with a first communications node or a second communications node, comprising:
a motion predictor configured to provide a first signal representing a predicted motion of said communications node;
a data block configured to provide a second signal representing an actual motion of said first communications node;
an element configured to adjust said first signal based on a difference between said first and second signals; and
a processor configured to compute at least one of a compensated transmission frequency or a compensated receiving frequency based on a predicted relative motion between said first and second communications nodes;
wherein said predicted relative motion is based on said first signal and a third signal that is representative of a predicted motion of said second communications node.
0. 2. A method of compensating a frequency associated with a first communications node or a second communications node in a communications system, comprising:
generating a first signal representing a predicted motion of said first communications node;
generating a second signal representing a predicted motion of said second communications node;
computing at least one of a compensated transmission frequency or a compensated receiving frequency based on a predicted relative motion between said first and second communications nodes, wherein said predicted relative motion is based on said first and second signals;
generating a third signal representing an actual motion of said first communications node;
generating a feedback signal representing a difference between said first signal and said third signal; and
applying said feedback signal to improve accuracy of said first signal.
0. 17. A communications system, comprising:
a first communications node, including
a first motion predictor to generate a first signal representative of a predicted motion of said first communications node,
a first data block to generate a second signal representative of an actual motion of said first communications node, and
a first element that generates a first feedback signal representative of a difference between said first signal and said second signal to improve accuracy of said first signal;
a second communications node, including
a second motion predictor to generate a third signal representative of a predicted motion of said second communications node,
a second data block to generate a fourth signal representative of an actual motion of said second communications node, and
a second element that generates a second feedback signal representative of a difference between said third signal and said fourth signal to improve accuracy of said third signal; and
a processor to compute at least one of a compensated transmission frequency or a compensated receiving frequency based on said first signal and said third signal.
0. 16. A communications system, comprising:
means for predicting a motion of a first communications node to generate a first signal representing the predicted motion of said first communications node;
means for predicting a motion of a second communications node to generate a second signal representing the predicted motion of said second communications node;
a processor to compute at least one of a compensated transmission frequency and a compensated receiving frequency based on said first signal and said second signal;
means for determining an actual motion of said first communications node to generate a third signal representing the actual motion of said first communications node;
means for determining an actual motion of said second communications node to generate a fourth signal representing the actual motion of said second communications node;
means for generating a first feedback signal representing a difference between said first signal and said third signal to improve accuracy of said first signal; and
means for generating a second feedback signal representing a difference between said second signal and said fourth signal to improve accuracy of said second signal.
1. In a satellite communications system involving a satellite vehicle sv1 and a second satellite vehicle sv2 moving relative to one another, a method for compensating at least one of a transmission frequency associated with sv1 and a received frequency associated with sv2, the method comprising the steps of:
predicting a motion of satellite vehicle sv1 and generating a first output signal representative of the predicted motion of satellite vehicle sv1;
predicting a motion of satellite vehicle sv2 and generating a second output signal representative of the predicted motion of satellite vehicle sv2;
supplying said first output signal and said second output signal to a processor and computing in said processor at least one of a compensating transmission frequency and a compensated receiving frequency based on said first output signal and said second output signal;
determining an actual motion of sv1 and generating a third output signal representative of the actual motion of sv1;
determining an actual motion of sv2 and generating a fourth output signal representative of the actual motion of sv2;
supplying said first output signal and said third output signal to a first summing junction and generating a first feedback signal representative of the difference between said first output signal and said third output signal;
supplying said second output signal and said fourth output signal to a second summing junction and generating a second feedback signal representative of the difference between said second output signal and said fourth output signal;
using said first feedback signal to improve the accuracy of said first output signal; and
using said second feedback signal to improve the accuracy of said second output signal.
0. 3. The method of
utilizing a static or dynamic flight plan associated with said first communications node to generate said first signal.
0. 4. The method of
0. 5. The method of
0. 6. The method of
0. 7. The method of
0. 8. The method of
receiving a real-time update including ephemeris data associated with at least one of said first communications node or said second communications node to generate said second signal.
0. 10. The communications system of
0. 11. The communications system of
0. 12. The communications system of
0. 13. The communications system of
0. 14. The communications system of
0. 18. The communications system of
0. 19. The communications system of
0. 20. The communications system of
0. 21. The communications system of
0. 22. The communications system of
|
The present invention relates to satellite communications systems, which include communication between two moving satellites, between one moving satellite and a ground-based station (moving or stationary), between a spaced-based vehicle and an airborne (but not space-based) vehicle, or any combination of the above.
In a satellite communications system, one satellite vehicle (SV1) transmits and receives data from another satellite vehicle (SV2). Even though one or both vehicles may be moving, if the relative distance between the two vehicles is constant, the carrier frequency on which data is transmitted from one vehicle to another is the same carrier frequency received by the receiving vehicle. In the more typical case, the relative motion between the two vehicles in communication is not constant, and Doppler effects come into play. As long as the relative motion between the transmitter and receiver is within the design constraints of those devices, classical techniques, such as those described in Spiker, James J., Digital Communications by Satellite, Prentice-Hall, Ch. 12, 1995, may be employed to compensate for the carrier frequency shift due to the relative motion between the two vehicles. For example, a frequency-locked loop or a phase-locked loop technique may be employed to track Doppler frequency shifts and maintain communication between the two vehicles. However, these classical tracking techniques often involve broadening the bandwidth of the frequency tracking device and/or the bandwidth of the receiver's noise limiting front-end filter, which tends to reduce the signal-to-noise ratio of the received signal. When the relative motion between the transmitter and the receiver is unacceptably high, the signal-to-noise ratio can become unacceptably low, rendering known compensation techniques insufficient.
A technique is thus needed which allows satellite vehicles to communicate with one another when the relative motion and the change in relative motion between two vehicles is high, while maintaining an acceptable signal-to-noise ratio of the received signal.
The subject invention will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the appended drawing FIGURE, wherein the referenced numerals in the drawing FIGURE correspond to the associated descriptions provided below, and the drawing FIGURE is a schematic block diagram of a preferred embodiment of a frequency compensation system in accordance with the present invention.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a first satellite vehicle (SV1) desires to transmit data to a second satellite vehicle (SV2), wherein the second satellite vehicle (SV2) may be a member of a constellation of satellites having known communication protocols. The first satellite vehicle SV1, which in this example is not a member of the constellation, may conveniently communicate with the second satellite vehicle SV2 as long as satellite SV1 comports with the protocols of the constellation to which satellite SV2 belongs. When the relative motion between SV1 and SV2 is sufficiently low, classical compensation techniques may be employed to account for the Dopplar shift in the transmitted frequency as a result of the relative motion between the two vehicles. Typically, the receiving satellite (in this example, SV2) would monitor a frequency range within which the received signal is expected to fall. However, when the Doppler effects render the use of conventional tracking techniques inadequate, the following compensation system may be employed.
Referring now to the drawing FIGURE, a compensation system 100 which, in a preferred embodiment, resides only on SV1, suitably comprises an SV1 motion predictor 102, an SV2 motion predictor 104, and a processor 116 for computing a predictive algorithm. More particularly, SV1 motion predictor 102 suitably comprises a static or dynamic flight plan associated with satellite vehicle SV1, which may include information relating to speed, trajectory, acceleration, and other position and motion information; SV2 motion predictor 104 suitably includes similar functionality for second satellite vehicle SV2. An output 126 of the SV1 motion predictor 102, and an output 124 of the SV2 motion predictor 104, are suitably supplied to processor 116, whereupon processor 116 outputs a predicted transmission carrier frequency signal 120, and a predicted receiver carrier frequency 122 based upon the predicted relative motion between the two vehicles. In the context of the illustrated embodiment, predicted transmission carrier frequency signal 120 represents the extent to which the transmitter on SV1 should compensate its frequency based on the predicted relative motion between the two vehicles; similarly, predicted receiver carrier signal 122 represents the extent to which the receiver on SV1 should compensate for the predicted relative motion between the two vehicles by adjusting to the frequency at which the received signal is expected to arrive at the receiver.
If the information regarding the motion of the two satellite vehicles (contained in respective predictors 102 and 104), as well as the algorithm contained within processor 116 were perfect, vehicles moving relative to one another could always communicate with a very high signal-to-noise ratio. In reality, however, the predictive models of satellite vehicle motion, as well as the algorithms used to calculate frequency compensation, are imperfect and, over time, degradation in frequency compensation will result. Thus, the foregoing compensation model may be enhanced, if desired, by applying, where practicable, real-time updates to the compensation model including ephemeris data of one or both space vehicles.
With continued reference to the drawing FIGURE, a measured SV1 ephemeris data block 114 supplies real-time updates to SV1 motion predictor 102; similarly, a measured SV2 ephemeris data block 118 is configured to supply real-time updates to SV2 motion predictor 104. More particularly, an output 128 of block 114, which comprises real-time information relating to the actual position and/or motion of satellite vehicle SV1, is supplied to a summing node 110. Output 126 of SV1 motion predictor 102 is suitably delayed through a delay element 106 and supplied to node 110, whereupon summing node 110 computes the difference between the predicted motion of first satellite vehicle SV1 and the measured motion of first satellite vehicle SV1. The difference between these two values, represented by a signal 134, is then supplied to SV1 motion predictor 102. Feedback signal 134 drives the error between the measured motion of SV1 (represented by output signal 128) and the predicted motion of SV1 (represented by output signal 126) to a minimum.
In a similar fashion, an output 130 of block 118, which comprises real-time information relating to the actual position and/or motion of satellite vehicle SV2, is supplied to a summing node 112. Output 124 of SV2 motion predictor 104 is suitably delayed through a delay element 108 and supplied to node 112, whereupon summing node 112 computes the difference between the predicted motion of second satellite vehicle SV2 and the measured motion of second satellite vehicle SV2, the difference between these values, represented by a signal 132, is then supplied to SV2 motion predictor 104. Feedback signal 132 drives the error between the measured motion of SV2 (represented by output signal 130) and the predicted motion of SV2 (represented by output signal 124) to a minimum.
By employing real-time position and/or motion data of one or both of the vehicles involved in a communication session to the compensation model as illustrated in the drawing FIGURE, the frequency compensation model can be significantly improved, thereby allowing computation of frequency compensation information, even in the presence of high relative motion dynamics between the two vehicles.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to the drawing FIGURE, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the scope of the invention is not limited to the specific forms shown in the FIGURE. Various modifications, substitutions, and enhancements may be made to the descriptions set forth herein, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention which is set forth in the appended claim.
Turcotte, Randy L., Orcutt, Edward K.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4074201, | Jul 26 1976 | GTE Government Systems Corporation | Signal analyzer with noise estimation and signal to noise readout |
5222252, | Aug 30 1990 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Stereo radio receiver multipath disturbance detection circuit |
5289194, | Jun 25 1992 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy; NAVY, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE | Combiner for two dimensional adaptive interference suppression system |
5343496, | Sep 24 1993 | TTI Inventions C LLC | Interference suppression in CDMA systems |
5432521, | Jan 14 1994 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Satellite receiver system having doppler frequency shift tracking |
5471657, | Dec 04 1992 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | Frequency tuning for satellite ground stations |
5493710, | Aug 02 1991 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Communication system having oscillation frequency calibrating function |
5524281, | Mar 31 1988 | Anritsu Company | Apparatus and method for measuring the phase and magnitude of microwave signals |
5596570, | Jul 13 1994 | Qualcomm Incorporated | System and method for simulating interference received by subscriber units in a spread spectrum communication network |
5694421, | Mar 17 1995 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Frequency-selective interference signal detecting apparatus and method thereof |
5697056, | May 08 1995 | CDC PROPRIETE INTELLECTUELLE | Communication system in which radio subscriber units mitigate interference |
5703595, | Aug 02 1996 | CDC PROPRIETE INTELLECTUELLE | Method and apparatus for erratic doppler frequency shift compensation |
5754537, | Mar 08 1996 | TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET L M ERICSSON PUBL | Method and system for transmitting background noise data |
5758271, | Jun 02 1995 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Apparatus and method for optimizing the quality of a received signal in a radio receiver |
5778310, | Nov 30 1995 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Co-channel interference reduction |
5874913, | Aug 29 1996 | CDC PROPRIETE INTELLECTUELLE | Method and apparatus to compensate for Doppler frequency shifts in a satellite communication system |
5881367, | Jul 25 1995 | Alcatel Espace | Method of regulating the power of a signal transmitted by a first station to a second station in a satellite telecommunication network |
5926767, | Dec 26 1996 | CDC PROPRIETE INTELLECTUELLE | Method and system reestablishing a temporarily interrupted dynamic communication link under intermittent fade conditions |
5983080, | Jun 03 1997 | AT & T Corp | Apparatus and method for generating voice signals at a wireless communications station |
5987320, | Jul 17 1997 | ERICSSON AB, FKA ERICSSON RADIO SYSTEMS, AB | Quality measurement method and apparatus for wireless communicaion networks |
5999797, | Nov 03 1997 | CDC PROPRIETE INTELLECTUELLE | Method and apparatus for providing private global networks in a satellite communication system |
6023615, | Nov 29 1995 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Method for controlling a diversity receiver apparatus in a radio subscriber unit |
6034952, | Apr 12 1996 | NTT DoCoMo, Inc | Method and instrument for measuring receiving SIR and transmission power controller |
6356740, | Jun 30 1995 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | Method and system of frequency stabilization in a mobile satellite communication system |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 10 2000 | ORCUTT, EDWARD K | Motorola, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022849 | /0387 | |
Oct 10 2000 | TURCOTTE, RANDY L | Motorola, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022849 | /0387 | |
Sep 28 2001 | Motorola, Inc | General Dynamics Decision Systems, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022849 | /0420 | |
Nov 18 2004 | General Dynamics Decision Systems, Inc | Lewis Sales LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022849 | /0444 | |
Aug 11 2015 | Lewis Sales LLC | ZARBAÑA DIGITAL FUND LLC | MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 037317 | /0171 | |
Dec 22 2022 | ZARBAÑA DIGITAL FUND LLC | INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 191 LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 062666 | /0789 | |
Feb 14 2023 | MIND FUSION, LLC | INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 191 LLC | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 063295 | /0001 | |
Feb 14 2023 | MIND FUSION, LLC | INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 186 LLC | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 063295 | /0001 | |
Feb 14 2023 | INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 191 LLC | MIND FUSION, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 064270 | /0685 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 25 2010 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 28 2014 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 01 2012 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 01 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 01 2013 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 01 2015 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 01 2016 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 01 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 01 2017 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 01 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 01 2020 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 01 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 01 2021 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 01 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |