Disclosed are methods and apparatus for improving the resiliency and airflow through a honeycomb air vent filter while providing EMI shielding. In one embodiment, the honeycomb can be manufactured from a dielectric (e.g., plastic) substrate to provide improved resistance to deformation as compared to conventional aluminum honeycomb. The dielectric honeycomb substrate is metallized to provide EMI shielding capability. The metallized honeycomb substrate is cut slightly oversize to fit an opening in an electronic enclosure, which results in elastic deformation of resilient perimeter spring fingers that are used to hold the metallized dielectric honeycomb in place and provide electrical conductivity between the metallized dielectric substrate and the enclosure, thereby eliminating the use of a frame. In another embodiment, additional conductive layers can be added to the metallized dielectric honeycomb. In yet another embodiment, the metallized dielectric honeycomb substrate can be utilized in a framed configuration to provide improved durability.
|
1. A frameless vent panel adapted to shield against electromagnetic interference (EMI) comprising:
a dielectric panel having a thickness defined by a first side and a second side, and defining a plurality of apertures, said dielectric panel further having a perimeter;
a first electrically conductive layer applied to the dielectric pane panel, wherein the conductively coated dielectric panel attenuates a transfer of electromagnetic energy from the first side to the second side of the substrate ; and
a strip of compressible conductive foam material, said strip having a width substantially equal to the thickness of said dielectric panel and being wrapped around the outer perimeter thereof and substantially covering said thickness between said first side and said second side, whereby the frameless vent panel is configured to be mounted within an opening in a manner such that the strip of compressible conductive foam material around the outer perimeter of the dielectric panel is compressed.
3. The frameless vent panel of
4. The frameless vent panel of
5. The frameless vent panel of
6. The frameless vent panel of
7. The frameless vent panel of
8. The frameless vent panel of
9. The frameless vent panel of
10. The frameless vent panel of
11. The frameless vent panel of
12. The frameless vent panel of
13. The frameless vent panel of
14. The frameless vent panel of
15. The frameless vent panel of
16. The frameless vent panel of
0. 17. The frameless vent panel of
|
of from 0.002 inch to 0.05 inch, but are not limited to this range. For applications where a more rugged dielectric honeycomb substrate 52 is required, a higher density dielectric honeycomb substrate 52 or a different honeycomb geometry can be selected.
To manufacture a vent panel according to the invention, in one embodiment referring now to
Next, the dielectric honeycomb substrate 52 can be shaped into any desired configuration (step 62). For example, a planar dielectric substrate 52 can be configured in any desired planar shape, such as a square, a rectangle, a circle, etc., having predetermined dimensions to conform to an intended aperture. Such overall shaping can be performed during the manufacturing stage of the substrate 52, for example by selectively altering the shape of a mold, or extruder. The shaping can also be performed post-manufacturing. For example, the substrate 52 can be cut using a knife, a saw, shears, a laser, or a die. Additionally, certain dielectric substrates, such as polymers, lend themselves to a variety of machining techniques. For example, a dielectric honeycomb substrate 52 can be machined to shape one or more of its edges along its perimeter to include a bevel, or a rabbet. Still further, the dielectric substrate 52 can be shaped to include a convex or concave surface or indentation over a portion of either or both of its planar surfaces. Such a planar surface deformation may be desired, to accommodate a mechanical fit.
In order to provide EMI shielding, a conductive layer 54 is applied to the dielectric honeycomb substrate 52, resulting in the metallized dielectric honeycomb filter 50. In one method, a first conductive layer is applied to the dielectric honeycomb substrate 52 (step 64). The first conductive layer can be applied using a variety of techniques known to those skilled in the art, such as electroless plating or physical vapor deposition. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,275,861 issued by Vaughn and U.S. Pat. No. 5,489,489 issued to Swirbel et al., the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety. For example, a conductor, such as copper, can be applied using an electroless bath as taught by Vaughn.
The electroless bath method is particularly well suited for a class of polymers known as plateless plastics. This class of plastics includes acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) and polycarbonates, along with other polymer compounds, such as polysulfones, polyamides, polypropylenes, polyethylene, and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Generally, the dielectric honeycomb substrate 52 should be pretreated to remove any impurities (e.g., dirt, and oil). Depending on the type of material, the substrate 52 may be treated still further to enhance its adhesion properties with the initial conductive layer. For example, the surface can be abraded by mechanical means (e.g., sanding or sandblasting) or by a chemical means (e.g., by using a solvent for softening or an acid for etching). A chemical pretreatment can also be added to alter the chemistry of the surface, further enhancing its ability to chemically bond to the first layer.
Other methods of applying the first conductive layer include applying a conductive paint, such as a lacquer or shellac impregnated with particulate conductors, such as copper, silver, or bronze. Still other methods of applying the first conductive layer include physical deposition, such as evaporation, non-thermal vaporization process (e.g., sputtering), and chemical vapor deposition. Sputtering techniques include radio-frequency (RF) diode, direct-current (DC) diode, triode, and magnetron sputtering. Physical vapor deposition includes such techniques as vacuum deposition, reactive evaporation, and gas evaporation.
Depending on the desired thickness and/or coverage, the step of applying the first conductive layer can be optionally repeated (step 66a), such that one or more additional conductive layers, being made of substantially the same conductor, are applied to the previously-treated substrate 52, thereby increasing the thickness of the layer. In repeating the application of the conducting layer, generally the same method of plating can be used; however, a different method can also be used.
Generally, any conductive material can be used for the conductive layer 54. Some examples of metals that can be used for the conductive layer 54 are copper, nickel, tin, aluminum, silver, graphite, bronze, gold, lead, palladium, cadmium, zinc and combinations or alloys thereof, such as lead-tin and gold-palladium. The conductive layer 54 can also be applied directly as a conductive compound. For example, the substrate 52 can be treated with a single electroless bath having both copper and nickel. The resulting conductive layer 54 is a compound of both copper and nickel.
Optionally, more than one type of conductive layer can be applied to the honeycomb substrate 52 (step 68). For example, after the initial conductive layer 54 has been applied, one or more additional conductive layers of the same, or different material, can be applied using electroless plating, electrolytic plating, physical vapor deposition, or other methods known to those skilled in the art (step 70). Electrolytic plating wold generally be available for applying subsequent conducting layers, as the initial conducting layer would provide the requisite surface conductivity.
In one embodiment, a second conductive layer of nickel is applied over a first conductive layer of copper, the copper providing a relatively high electrical conductivity and the nickel providing a corrosion resistant top coat. As with the initial conductive layer 54, and for similar reasons, the second type of conductive coating can be optionally reapplied until a desired thickness is achieved.
Additional layers of coating or treatment of still other different types of conductive, or even non-conductive materials can be optionally applied to the metallized dielectric honeycomb filter 50 (step 72). For example a fire retardant, a mildew inhibitor, or an anti-corrosion treatment can be applied to the metallized dielectric honeycomb filter 50. These coatings can be selectively applied either covering the entire surface, or any portion thereof. For example, the metallized dielectric honeycomb filter 50 can be completely immersed in a fire retardant, or selectively treated with a corrosion inhibitor, using a masking technique such that a perimeter of the filter 50 remains untreated, thereby avoiding any reduction in the quality of the achievable electrical contact.
Further, the metallized, treated filter 50 can again be shaped, as required, by any of the previously disclosed techniques (step 74). Also, an edge treatment can be optionally applied to the perimeter or mounting surface of the filter 50 (step 76). Particular edge treatments include commercially available EMI gaskets, including metallized spring fingers, conductive fabrics, conductive elastomers, wire mesh, conductive foam, and conductive fabric coated elastomers.
In order to improve airflow, reduce costs, and simplify manufacture, the metallized dielectric substrate 50, referring again to
The cylindrical tubes 55 that make up the cells 53 of the metallized dielectric honeycomb filter 50, as shown in
The cells 53 can be cut along their diameter, leaving an approximately semicircular cell portion, as shown. Alternatively, the cells 53 can be cut leaving either a greater or lesser amount of the cell wall to form a spring.
In yet other embodiments, shown in
In other embodiments, shown in FIGS. 8A—8M, a band frame or slim profile frame 96′,96″,96′″,96″″, generally 96, is added to the metallized dielectric honeycomb filter 50. In the band frame configuration, as shown in
In yet another embodiment, in a slim frame configuration, shown in
In yet further embodiments, the band frame 96 may be constructed from any conductive material that maintains maximum air flow area through the dielectric honeycomb filter 50, but in addition to being electrically conductive, can also help to accommodate variations in dimensional tolerances during insertion of the dielectric honeycomb filter 50 onto the cabinet 20. Dimensional tolerances between the dielectric honeycomb filter 50 and the enclosure 20 can be accommodated, for example, by using conductive foam, conductive fabric, or conductive fabric wrapped foam from the band material. These band materials create good electrical contact just like a metal band, but unlike a metal band, these band materials have a much lower compression force and are more complaint allowing them to readily accommodate tolerance variations between the metallized dielectric honeycomb filter 50 and the cabinet 20. Conductive fabric wrapped foams and conductive foams can be obtained from Laird Technologies, Inc., located in Delaware Water Gap, Pa.
In one embodiment, illustrated in
As readily understood by those skilled in the art, many different configurations can be used to contain the metallized dielectric honeycomb filter 50 in the enclosure 20.
The metallized dielectric honeycomb filter 50 provides improved airflow while meeting stringent flammability standards. Once One such inflammability standard is the UL94 Vertical Flame Test, described in detail in Underwriter Laboratories Standard 94 entitled “Tests for Flammability of Plastic Materials for Parts in Devices and Appliances,” 5th Edition, 1996, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The metallized dielectric vent panels 50 according to the invention are able to achieve V0 flame rating, as well as V1 and V2 vertical ratings described in the standard.
EMI shielding effectiveness and airflow test data for a metallized dielectric honeycomb filter in accordance with certain embodiments of the invention are shown respectively in
The filters tested for airflow effectiveness are the standard aluminum honeycomb and two different polycarbonate polymer honeycombs with a plating of nickel over copper in accordance with the invention. The test panels were about 0.5 inch thick with a cell size of about 0.125 inch. One of the dielectric honeycomb panels had a density of about 4 lb/ft3 and the other dielectric honeycomb panel had a density of about 10 lb/ft3.
Accordingly, vent panels produced in accordance with the invention can yield significantly improved shielding effectiveness for the same airflow characteristics as conventional metal vent panels.
Variations, modifications, and other implementations of what is described herein will occur to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as claimed. The various features and configurations shown and equivalents thereof can be used in various combinations and permutations. Accordingly, the invention is to be defined not by the preceding illustrative descriptions, but instead by the following claims.
van Haaster, Philip, Lambert, Michael, McFadden, Jeff
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
9173333, | Jan 25 2013 | Laird Technologies, Inc.; LAIRD TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Shielding structures including frequency selective surfaces |
9307631, | Jan 25 2013 | Laird Technologies, Inc. | Cavity resonance reduction and/or shielding structures including frequency selective surfaces |
9622338, | Jan 25 2013 | Laird Technologies, Inc.; LAIRD TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Frequency selective structures for EMI mitigation |
D728773, | May 08 2012 | LAIRD TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Vent panel |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3231663, | |||
3546359, | |||
3580981, | |||
3584134, | |||
3991242, | Oct 30 1973 | Brunswick Corporation | Panel end structure |
4143501, | Oct 30 1973 | Brunswick Corporation | Materable unitary edge member and panel |
4851608, | May 08 1987 | Parker Intangibles LLC | Electromagnetic shielding media and methods for manufacturing the same |
5032689, | Aug 15 1989 | Parker Intangibles LLC | EMI/RFI shielding vent and method of use |
5082734, | Nov 13 1990 | LAIRD TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Catalytic, water-soluble polymeric films for metal coatings |
5217556, | May 31 1990 | Hexcel Corporation | Continuous process for the preparation of unitary thermoplastic honeycomb containing areas with different physical properties |
5275861, | Dec 21 1989 | LAIRD TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Radiation shielding fabric |
5489489, | Jul 21 1994 | Motorola, Inc. | Substrate having an optically transparent EMI/RFI shield |
5506047, | Oct 23 1991 | W L GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC | Electromagnetic interfernce shielding filter |
5895885, | Mar 20 1997 | Air vent for electromagnetic shielding | |
5910639, | Mar 20 1997 | Air vent panels for electromagnetic shielding | |
6018125, | Nov 15 1996 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP | High frequency EMI shield with air flow for electronic device enclosure |
6063152, | Feb 19 1997 | VERTIV ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC | Tuned electromagnetic interference air filter |
6171357, | Jan 04 1999 | ECI Telecom Ltd | Air filter |
6211458, | Feb 17 1998 | Parker Intangibles LLC | EMI shielded vent panel and method |
6252161, | Nov 22 1999 | Dell USA, L.P. | EMI shielding ventilation structure |
6297446, | Feb 26 1999 | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | High performance EMC vent panel |
6426459, | Aug 17 1999 | Parker Intangibles LLC | EMI shielding vent panel for high volume applications |
6610922, | Dec 20 2001 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Apparatus for securing an electromagnetic shield in a conductive casing |
6646197, | May 02 2000 | Nortel Networks Limited | High performance EMI shield for electronic equipment |
7338547, | Oct 02 2003 | LAIRD TECHNOLOGIES, INC | EMI-absorbing air filter |
20020046849, | |||
20030085050, | |||
20040174676, | |||
20060150599, | |||
EP843512, | |||
EP883978, | |||
EP1799023, | |||
JP10256777, | |||
JP2001503915, | |||
JP8064988, | |||
JP8162794, | |||
JP8264990, | |||
WO113695, | |||
WO2004032580, | |||
WO9732459, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Sep 05 2006 | Laird Technologies, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 13 2010 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Aug 22 2012 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 31 2013 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 03 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 31 2014 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 31 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 31 2017 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 03 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 31 2018 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 31 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 31 2021 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 03 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 31 2022 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 31 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |