A method of compensating for distortion within a composite image is disclosed. A biometric surface is sensed with a swipe imager. The images so provided are assembled into a composite image of the biometric surface. The composite image is then adjusted by insertion or deletion of rows therein to result in an image with a different number of rows.
|
1. A method of compensating for distortion within a composite image comprisingthe steps of :
sensing a biometric surface with a swipe imager to provide sensed data;
forming a composite image from sensed data of the a biometric surfacefrom the sensed data ; and,
adjusting the composite image along a dimension thereof to one of expand or decrease the composite image size along said dimension by one of removing composite image elements along a line perpendicular to said dimension within the composite image and or adding additional image elements along a line perpendicular to said dimension within the composite image to result in a second composite image with a different number of parallel lines of composite image elements perpendicular to the dimensiontherein .
0. 56. A swipe contact imager comprising:
means for sensing a biometric surface and for providing image data relating to portions thereof; and
means for forming a composite image from the image data and adjusting the composite image along a dimension thereof to expand or decrease the composite image size along said dimension by removing composite image elements along a line perpendicular to said dimension within the composite image or adding image elements along a line perpendicular to said dimension within the composite image to result in a second composite image with a different number of parallel lines of composite image elements perpendicular to the dimension.
35. A storage medium having stored therein data, the data indicative of instructions for performing the steps of whose contents cause a computing system to perform a method, comprising:
sensing a biometric surface with a swipe imager to provide sensed data;
forming a composite image of the from sensed data of a biometric surfacefrom the sensed data ; and,
adjusting the composite image along a dimension thereof to one of expand or decrease the composite image size along said the dimension by one of removing composite image elements along a line perpendicular to said the dimension within the composite image and or adding additional image elements along a line perpendicular to said the dimension within the composite image to result in a second composite image with a different number of parallel lines of composite image elements perpendicular to the dimensiontherein .
34. A swipe contact imager comprising:
a platen across which a biometric surface is to be passed for imaging thereof;
an imaging circuit for sensing a biometric surface passing across the platen and for providing image data relating to portions thereof; and
a processor for forming that forms a composite image from the image data and for adjusting adjusts the composite image along a dimension thereof to one of expand or decrease the composite image size along said dimension by one of removing composite image elements along a line perpendicular to said dimension within the composite image and or adding additional image elements along a line perpendicular to said dimension within the composite image to result in a second composite image with a different number of parallel lines of composite image elements perpendicular to the dimensiontherein .
2. A method according to
3. A method according to
4. A method according to
5. A method according to
6. A method according to
7. A method according to
8. A method according to
9. A method according to
10. A method according to
11. A method according to
determining an amount of compression within the composite image;
adding lines of image elements within the composite image based on the determined amount of compression; and
compensating for image distortion along an axis orthogonal to the dimension.
12. A method according to
13. A method according to
14. A method according to
15. A method according to
16. A method according to
17. A method according to
18. A method according to
19. A method according to
20. A method according to
21. A method according to
22. A method according to
23. A method according to
24. A method according to
25. A method according to
determining an amount of stretching;
removing lines of image elements from the composite image based on the determined amount of stretching; and
compensating for image distortion along an axis orthogonal to the dimension.
26. A method according to
27. A method according to
28. A method according to
29. A method according to
30. A method according to
31. A method according to
determining whether the composite image is stretched or compressed along the dimension;
when the composite image is compressed, adjusting the composite image along the dimension to expand the composite image size along said dimension by adding additional image elements along a line perpendicular to said a dimension within the composite image to result in the second composite image with a different number of parallel lines of image elements perpendicular to said dimension; and,
when the composite image is stretched, adjusting the composite image along the dimension to decrease the composite image size along said dimension by removing image elements along a line perpendicular to said a dimension within the composite image to result in the second composite image with a different number of parallel lines of image elements perpendicular to said at least one dimensiontherein .
32. A method according to
33. A method according to
36. A The storage medium according to of
37. A The storage medium according to of
38. A The storage medium according to of
40. A The storage medium according to of
41. A The storage medium according to of
determining an amount of compression within the composite image;
adding lines of image elements within the composite image based on the determined compression; and
compensating for image distortion along an axis orthogonal to the dimension in dependence upon the determined amount of compression.
42. A The storage medium according to of
43. A The storage medium according to of
44. A The storage medium according to of
45. A The storage medium according to
46. A The storage medium according to of
47. A The storage medium according to of
48. A The storage medium according to of
determining an amount of stretching;
removing lines of image elements from the composite image based on the determined amount of stretching; and
compensating for image distortion along an axis orthogonal to the dimension in dependence upon the determined amount of stretching.
49. A The storage medium according to of
50. A The storage medium according to of
51. A The storage medium according to of
52. A The storage medium according to of
53. A The storage medium according to of
determining whether the composite image is stretched or compressed along the dimension;
when the composite image is compressed, adjusting the composite image along the dimension to expand the composite image size along said the dimension by adding additional image elements along a line perpendicular to said the a dimension within the composite image to result in the second composite image with a different number of parallel lines of image elements perpendicular to said the dimension; and,
when the composite image is stretched, adjusting the composite image along the dimension to decrease the composite image size along said the dimension by removing image elements along a line perpendicular to said the a dimension within the composite image to result in the second composite image with a different number of parallel lines of image elements perpendicular to said the at least one dimension therein.
54. A The storage medium according to of
55. A The storage medium according to of
0. 57. The swipe contact imager of
0. 58. The swipe contact imager of
0. 59. The swipe contact imager of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This application claims priority from the U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/306,448 filed Jul. 20, 2001.
The invention relates generally to contact imagers and more particularly to swipe contact imagers.
Biometric techniques for determining the identity of individuals are being used increasingly in authentication, recognition, and/or access systems. These techniques use biometric identifiers or human characteristics to verify or identify an individual. The fact that most human characteristics are unique to each individual, are difficult to reproduce by others, and are easily converted to electronic data, is particularly advantageous in biometric identification applications.
Historically, fingerprints have been the most widely used biometric identifiers, as is evident from law enforcement's extensive use of fingerprinting. The recent trends in biometric identification have been toward automating the above-mentioned authentication, recognition, and/or access systems. Most current techniques rely upon correlation methods that use automated detection systems connected to a computer database, for comparing detected biometric data to biometric data stored in the database, to confirm or determine the identity of an individual. Such automated systems have been used to identify individuals before granting access to cars, computers, home or business offices, hotel rooms, and in general, any sensitive or restricted area.
Various optical devices are known which employ prisms upon which a finger whose print is to be identified is placed. For example, the prism has a first surface upon which a finger is placed, a second surface disposed at an acute angle to the first surface through which the fingerprint is viewed and a third illumination surface through which light is directed into the prism. In some cases, the illumination surface is at an acute angle to the first surface, as seen for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,187,482 and 5,187,748. In other cases, the illumination surface is parallel to the first surface, as seen for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,109,427 and 5,233,404.
An alternative type of contact imaging device is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,353,056 in the name of Tsikos issued Oct. 5, 1982, herein incorporated by reference. The imaging device that is described by Tsikos uses a capacitive sensing approach. To this end, the imaging device comprises a two dimensional, row and column, array of capacitors, each comprising a pair of spaced apart electrodes, carried in a sensing member and covered by an insulating film. The sensors rely upon deformation to the sensing member caused by a finger being placed thereon so as to vary locally the spacing between capacitor electrodes, according to the ridge/trough pattern of the fingerprint, and hence, the capacitance of the capacitors.
A further contact imaging device is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,325,442 in the name of Knapp, issued Jun. 28, 1994, herein incorporated by reference. Knapp discloses a capacitance measuring contact imaging device in the form of a single large active matrix array, formed by the deposition and definition by photolithographic processes of a number of layers on a single large insulating substrate. Electrodes and sets of address conductors formed of metal and field effect transistors are formed as amorphous silicon or polycrystalline silicon thin film transistors (TFTs) using an appropriate substrate of, for example, glass or quartz.
Additionally, a fingerprint sensing device and recognition system that includes an array of closely spaced apart sensing elements, each comprising a sensing electrode and an amplifier circuit, is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,778,089 in the name of Borza, issued Jul. 7, 1998, herein incorporated by reference.
“Swipe imagers” are also known, wherein an individual places a fingertip into contact with a surface of a contact imaging device and then draws, or “swipes”, the fingertip across a sensing portion of the surface. Images from adjacent portions of the fingertip are captured and combined in order to construct a composite image of the fingertip having an area that is greater than the area of a single captured image. In this way, an area of the fingertip that is substantially larger than the sensing portion is imaged. Such an arrangement allows a smaller capacitive fingerprint scanner to be used, which is advantageous due to lower manufacturing costs, improved robustness, and so forth. Also, the small area required is highly advantageous for embedded applications such as with a cell phone, a telephone, a computer (laptop) and so forth. Unfortunately, images acquired with conventional swipe imagers are typically distorted relative to images captured with static imaging techniques.
It is an object of the invention to image a biometric surface using a swipe contact imager and to provide a composite image having less distortion than the raw composite image formed through mere image concatenation.
In accordance with the invention there is provided a method of compensating for distortion within a composite image comprising the steps of: sensing a biometric surface with a swipe imager to provide sensed data; forming a composite image of the biometric surface from the sensed data; and, adjusting the composite image along a dimension thereof to one of expand or decrease the composite image size along said dimension by one of removing composite image elements along a line perpendicular to said dimension within the composite image and adding additional image elements along a line perpendicular to said dimension within the composite image to result in a second composite image with a different number of parallel lines of composite image elements perpendicular to the dimension therein.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention there is provided a swipe contact imager comprising: a platen across which a biometric surface is to be passed for imaging thereof; an imaging circuit for sensing a biometric surface passing across the platen and for providing image data relating to portions thereof; and a processor for forming a composite image from the image data and for adjusting the composite image along a dimension thereof to one of expand or decrease the composite image size along said dimension by one of removing composite image elements along a line perpendicular to said dimension within the composite image and adding additional image elements along a line perpendicular to said dimension within the composite image to result in a second composite image with a different number of parallel lines of composite image elements perpendicular to the dimension therein.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the invention there is provided a storage medium having stored therein data, the data indicative of instructions for performing the steps of: sensing a biometric surface with a swipe imager to provide sensed data; forming a composite image of the biometric surface from the sensed data; and, adjusting the composite image along a dimension thereof to one of expand or decrease the composite image size along said dimension by one of removing composite image elements along a line perpendicular to said dimension within the composite image and adding additional image elements along a line perpendicular to said dimension within the composite image to result in a second composite image with a different number of parallel lines of composite image elements perpendicular to the dimension therein.
The invention will now be described with reference to the attached drawings in which:
Referring to
In FIG. 1(b) the same fingerprint is shown reconstructed. The fingertip was swiped in a generally upward direction along the swipe contact imager and during swiping thereof, a heavy pressure was applied by the individual. Thus, the distortion is significant therein causing a stretching of the fingerprint as is noted by the increased distance between the features f1 and f2.
In FIG. 1(c), a same fingerprint is again shown reconstructed. The fingertip was swiped in a generally upward direction along the swipe contact imager and during swiping thereof, a medium pressure was applied by the individual. Thus, the distortion is significant therein causing a stretching of the fingerprint as is noted by the increased distance between the features f1 and f2.
In FIG. 1(d), a same fingerprint is again shown reconstructed. The fingertip was swiped in a generally upward direction along the swipe contact imager and during swiping thereof, a light pressure was applied by the individual. Thus, the distortion is less significant than in either of the two previous images though a stretching of the fingerprint is evident as is noted by the increased distance between the features f1 and f2.
In FIG. 1(e) the same fingerprint is again shown reconstructed. The fingertip was swiped in a generally downward direction along the swipe contact imager and during swiping thereof, a heavy pressure was applied by the individual. Thus, the distortion is significant therein causing a compressing of the fingerprint as is noted by the decreased distance between the features f1 and f2.
In FIG. 1(f), a same fingerprint is again shown reconstructed. The fingertip was swiped in a generally downward direction along the swipe contact imager and during swiping thereof, a medium pressure was applied by the individual. Thus, the distortion is significant therein causing a compressing of the fingerprint as is noted by the decreased distance between the features f1 and f2.
In FIG. 1(g), a same fingerprint is again shown reconstructed. The fingertip was swiped in a generally downward direction along the swipe contact imager and during swiping thereof, a light pressure was applied by the individual. Thus, the distortion is less significant than in either of the two previous images though a compressing of the fingerprint is evident as is noted by the decreased distance between the features f1 and f2.
Of course, for a swipe contact fingerprint imager to be a drop in replacement to existing platen based contact imaging devices, the resulting fingerprint image is preferably as similar as possible to those captured by a non-swipe contact imager. As such, it would be advantageous to transform the image to reduce effects of stretching and compressing visible in reconstructed swipe images.
Table 1 below sets out the effects of distortion. It is observed that swiping a finger upwards causes stretching while swiping a finger downwards causes compression. Further, the compression in a downward swiped fingertip is more acute near a top of the fingerprint that than elsewhere. There is also some horizontal distortion, more so in the upward swipe direction that than in the downward swiped fingerprints.
TABLE 1
Distortion Effects Summary
Type
Dir/Press
Abs (f1x-f2x)
Abs (f1y-f2)
abs (f1-f2)
Errorx
Errory
Error
Flat
n/a
129
153
200
n/a
n/a
n/a
Swipe
Up/Heavy
147
172
226
14.0%
12.4%
13.0%
Swipe
Up/Medium
151
188
241
17.0%
22.9%
20.5%
Swipe
Up/Light
150
182
236
16.3%
19.0%
18.0%
Swipe
Down/Heavy
151
110
187
17.0%
−28.1%
−6.5%
Swipe
Down/Medium
134
112
175
3.9%
−26.8%
−12.5%
Swipe
Down/Light
140
113
180
8.5%
−26.1%
−10.0%
Referring to
Once the composite image is constructed, one row is inserted within the image for every N image rows at 23. For example, N=4. Thus, the image is increased in vertical direction. By doing so, the feature spacing along the vertical direction—the y axis—is increased to compensate for compressing of the image occurring during image capture. Finally, the corrected composite image is provided at 24.
Of course, the use of a single fixed row insertion rate is not equally beneficial to each of the images 1(e), (f), and (g) since the compression ratio for each is different. That said, it was found to sufficiently improve the imaging results in general as shown in Table 2 and to therefore be advantageous.
TABLE 2
Distortion Correction Summary
Type
Dir/Press
Abs (f1x-f2x)
Abs (f1y-f2)
abs (f1-f2)
Errorx
Errory
Error
Flat
n/a
129
153
200
n/a
n/a
n/a
Swipe
Down/Heavy
151
158
218
17.0%
3.3%
8.5%
Swipe
Down/Medium
134
140
194
3.9%
−8.5%
−3.2%
Swipe
Down/Light
140
141
199
8.5%
−7.8%
−0.7%
Referring to
Once the composite image is constructed, an analysis of the image is performed to determine an amount of compression therein at 33. The determined amount of compression is used to estimate N. At step 34, one row is inserted within the image for every N image rows. Thus, the image is increased in vertical direction. By doing so, the feature spacing along the vertical direction—the y axis—is increased to compensate for compressing of the image occurring during image capture. Finally, the corrected composite image is provided at 35.
Referring to
Once the composite image is constructed, an amount of compression therein is determined. For example, an analysis of the image compared to a known image of the same biometric surface is performed to determine an amount of compression therein. Alternatively, the compression is determined based on a measured force applied during sensing of the image of the biometric surface. The amount of compression is then used with further image analysis to determine a distribution of compression within the image at 43. The distribution may be constant such as 1 in every 4 rows or may be a segmented distribution such as 1 in 3 for the top third and 1 in 5 for the remaining portion of the image. Alternatively, the distribution may be mathematical in nature following a linear or non linear relation with a location within the image.
The determined amount of compression is used to estimate where to insert additional rows within the image. At step 44, one row is inserted within the image for each estimated location wherein a row is to be inserted. Thus, the image is increased in vertical direction. By doing so, the feature spacing along the vertical direction—the y axis—is increased to compensate for compressing of the image occurring during image capture. Finally, the corrected composite image is provided at 45.
Referring to
Once the composite image is constructed, an amount of compression therein is determined. For example, an analysis of the image compared to a known image of the same biometric surface is performed to determine an amount of compression therein. Alternatively, the compression is determined based on a measured force applied during sensing of the image of the biometric surface. The amount of compression is then used with further image analysis to determine a distribution of vertical compression within the image and horizontal distortion within the image at 53.
The determined amount of compression is used to estimate where to insert additional rows within the image. At step 54, one row is inserted within the image for each estimated location wherein a row is to be inserted and horizontal distortion compensation is performed. Thus, the image is increased in vertical direction. By doing so, the feature spacing along the vertical direction—the y axis—is increased to compensate for compressing of the image occurring during image capture and distortion along the horizontal axis is compensated for in dependence upon the amount of compression. Finally, the corrected composite image is provided at 55.
Referring to
Once the composite image is constructed, one row is removed within the image for every N image rows at 63. For example, N=4. Thus, the image is decreased in vertical direction. By doing so, the feature spacing along the vertical direction—the y axis—is decreased to compensate for stretching of the image occurring during image capture. Finally, the corrected composite image is provided at 64.
Referring to
Once the composite image is constructed, an amount of stretching therein is determined. For example, an analysis of the image compared to a known image of the same biometric surface is performed to determine an amount of stretching therein. Alternatively, the stretching is determined based on a measured force applied during sensing of the image of the biometric surface. The determined amount of stretching is used to estimate N. At step 74, one row is removed from within the image for every N image rows. Thus, the image is decreased in vertical direction. By doing so, the feature spacing along the vertical direction—the y axis—is decreased to compensate for stretching of the image occurring during image capture. Finally, the corrected composite image is provided at 75.
Referring to
Once the composite image is constructed, an amount of stretching therein is determined. For example, an analysis of the image compared to a known image of the same biometric surface is performed to determine an amount of stretching therein. Alternatively, the stretching is determined based on a measured force applied during sensing of the image of the biometric surface. The amount of stretching is then used with further image analysis to determine a distribution of stretching within the image at 83. The distribution may be constant such as 1 in every 4 rows or may be a segmented distribution such as 1 in 3 for the top third and 1 in 5 for the remaining portion of the image. Alternatively, the distribution may be mathematical in nature following a linear or non linear relation with a location within the image.
The determined amount of stretching is used to estimate where to remove extra rows within the image. At step 84, one row is removed from within the image for each estimated location wherein a row is to be removed. Thus, the image is decreased in vertical direction. By doing so, the feature spacing along the vertical direction—the y axis—is decreased to compensate for stretching of the image occurring during image capture. Finally, the corrected composite image is provided at 85.
Referring to
Once the composite image is constructed, an amount of stretching therein is determined. For example, an analysis of the image compared to a known image of the same biometric surface is performed to determine an amount of stretching therein. Alternatively, the stretching is determined based on a measured force applied during sensing of the image of the biometric surface. The amount of stretching is then used with further image analysis to determine a distribution of vertical stretching within the image and horizontal distortion within the image at 93.
The determined amount of stretching is used to estimate where to remove rows from within the image. At step 94, one row is removed from within the image for each estimated location wherein a row is to be removed and horizontal distortion compensation is performed. Thus, the image is decreased in vertical direction. By doing so, the feature spacing along the vertical direction—the y axis—is decreased to compensate for stretching of the image occurring during image capture and distortion along the horizontal axis is compensated for in dependence upon the amount of stretching. Finally, the corrected composite image is provided at 95.
Referring to
Once the composite image is constructed, an amount of vertical distortion therein is determined. For example, an analysis of the image compared to a known image of the same biometric surface is performed to determine an amount of vertical distortion therein. Alternatively, the vertical distortion is determined based on a measured force applied during sensing of the image of the biometric surface. The amount of stretching or compression is then used with further image analysis to determine a distribution of vertical stretching or compression within the image and horizontal distortion within the image at 103.
The determined amount of vertical distortion is used to estimate whether to add or remove rows and where within the image to do so. At step 104a, one row is removed from within the image for each estimated location wherein a row is to be removed when vertical stretching is detected. Alternatively at step 104b, one row is added within the image for each estimated location wherein a row is to be inserted when vertical compression is detected. At 105, horizontal distortion compensation is performed. Thus, the image is adjusted in vertical direction. By doing so, the feature spacing along the vertical direction—the y axis—is adjusted to compensate for detected vertical distortion of the image occurring during image capture and distortion along the horizontal axis is compensated for in dependence upon the amount of vertical distortion. Finally, the corrected composite image is provided at 106.
Referring to
Of course, other forms of detectable distortion are compensatable according to the invention as are other forms of distortion highly correlated to detectable forms of distortion. The improvement in the composite image quality for a particular purpose is a function of the biometric surface imaged, the quality of image reconstruction, and the particular purpose.
Numerous other embodiments may be envisaged without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 4353056, | Jun 05 1980 | Siemens Corporation | Capacitive fingerprint sensor |
| 4784484, | May 02 1985 | Jydsk Telefon A/S | Method and apparatus for automatic scanning of fingerprints |
| 4832485, | Sep 03 1982 | COMMONWEALTH TECHNOLOGY INC | Image enhancer |
| 5109427, | Nov 13 1989 | Goldstar Co., Ltd. | Fingerprint recognition device using a hologram |
| 5187482, | Mar 02 1992 | General Electric Company | Delta sigma analog-to-digital converter with increased dynamic range |
| 5187748, | Jul 21 1990 | Goldstar, Inc. | Optical apparatus for fingerprint identification system |
| 5233404, | Sep 29 1989 | OSCAN ELECTRO-OPTICS INC | Optical scanning and recording apparatus for fingerprints |
| 5325442, | May 18 1990 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Fingerprint sensing device and recognition system having predetermined electrode activation |
| 5778089, | Mar 04 1996 | Activcard Ireland Limited | Driver circuit for a contact imaging array |
| 5926555, | Oct 20 1994 | VERIDIAN ENGINEERING, INC | Fingerprint identification system |
| 6038043, | Jul 07 1995 | Advanced Precision Technology Inc | Method for recording a holographic optical element |
| 6134340, | Dec 22 1997 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Fingerprint feature correlator |
| 6466686, | Jan 07 1998 | UNILOC 2017 LLC | System and method for transforming fingerprints to improve recognition |
| 6643390, | Apr 19 2000 | Kioba Processing, LLC | Compact fingerprint identification device |
| 20020030359, | |||
| EP813164, | |||
| WO36548, | |||
| WO9963476, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Jun 14 2002 | HAMID, LAURENCE | Activcard Ireland Limited | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 026003 | /0952 |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Feb 25 2013 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
| Feb 24 2017 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Oct 19 2013 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 19 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 19 2014 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Oct 19 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Oct 19 2017 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 19 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 19 2018 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Oct 19 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Oct 19 2021 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 19 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 19 2022 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Oct 19 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |