Disclosed are methods of intravenous administration of nanoparticulate drug formulations to a mammal to avoid adverse hemodynamic effects: by reducing the rate and concentration of the nanoparticles in the formulations; or by pre-treating the subject with histamine; or by pretreating the subject with a desensitizing amount of the nanoparticulate drug formulations.
|
13. A method of administering a nanoparticulate composition to a mammal without eliciting adverse hemodynamic effects comprising intravenously administering to said mammal an effective amount of a nanoparticulate drug composition at an infusion rate not exceeding a solids dose rate of less than 10 mg/min, wherein said drug composition comprises:
(a) particles having an effective average particle size of from about 50 to about 1000 nm and consisting essentially of from about 0.1 to about 99.9% by weight of an organic drug substance entrapped in from about 99.9 to about 0.1% by weight of liposome or a colloidal polymeric material; and #10#
(b) a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier therefor.
17. A method of administering a nanoparticulate composition to a mammal without eliciting adverse hemodynamic effects comprising:
(a) intravenously administering to said mammal an antihistamine in the amount of from about 5 to about 10 mg/kg of body weight; and
(b) subsequently intravenously administering to said mammal an effective amount of a nanoparticulate drug composition comprising: (1) particles having an effective average particle size of from about 50 to bout #10# about 1000 nm and consisting essentially of from about 0.1 to about 99.9% by weight of an organic drug substance entrapped in from about 99.9 to about 0.1% by weight of liposome or a colloidal polymeric material; and (2) a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier therefor.
5. A method of administering a nanoparticulate composition to a mammal without eliciting adverse hemodynamic effects comprising:
(a) intravenously administering to said mammal an antihistamine in the amount of from about 5 to about 10 mg/kg of body weight; and
(b) subsequently intravenously administering to said mammal an effective amount of a nanoparticulate drug composition comprising: (1) particles consisting essentially of from about 0.1 to about 99.9% by weight of a crystalline drug substance having a solubility in water of less than 10 mg/ml; and (b 2) a surface modifier adsorbed on the surface of the drug substance in an amount of from about 99.9 to about 0.1% by weight and sufficient to maintain an effective average particle size of less than about 1000 nm. #10#
1. A method of administering a nanoparticulate composition to a mammal without eliciting adverse hemodynamic effects comprising intravenously administering to said mammal an effective amount of a nanoparticulate drug composition at an infusion rate not exceeding a solids dose rate of less than 10 mg/min, wherein said drug composition comprises:
(a) particles consisting essentially of from about 0.1 to about 99.9% by weight of a crystalline organic drug substance having a solubility in water of less than 10 mg/ml; #10#
(b) a surface modifier adsorbed on the surface of the drug substance in an amount of from about 0.1 to about 99.9% by weight and sufficient to maintain an effective average particle size of from about 50 nm to about 1000 nm; and
(c) a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier therefor.
9. A method of administering a nanoparticulate composition to a mammal without eliciting adverse hemodynamic effects comprising:
(a) intravenously administering to said mammal a desensitizing amount of a nanoparticulate drug composition at an infusion rate not exceeding a solids dose rate of less than 10 mg/min; and #10#
(b) intravenously administering an effective amount of said nanoparticulate composition comprising: (1) particles consisting essentially of from about 0.1 to about 99.9% by weight of a crystalline organic drug substance having a solubility in water of less than 10 mg/ml; (2) a surface modifier adsorbed on the surface of the drug substance in an amount sufficient to maintain an effective average particle size of from about 100 to about 1000 nm; and (3) a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier therefor.
2. The method of
6. The method of
12. The method of
14. The method of
18. The method of
0. 21. The method of
0. 22. The method of
0. 23. The method of
0. 24. The method of
0. 25. The method of
0. 26. The method of
0. 27. The method of
0. 28. The method of
0. 29. The method of
0. 30. The method of
0. 31. The method of
0. 32. The method of
0. 33. The method of
0. 34. The method of
0. 35. The method of
|
This application claims the benefit under 35 USC 119(e) of Provisional Application Number 60/004,488 filed Sep. 29, 1995.
The present invention is directed to nanoparticulate, liposome, emulsion and polymeric colloidal drug formulations for intravenous administration, the delivery of which to a mammal, reduces/eliminates the adverse physiological effects. More particularly, the invention relates to a method of intravenous nanoparticulate, liposome, emulsion and polymeric colloidal drug formulations to a mammal, wherein the rate of infusion and concentration of the drug is controlled.
Nanoparticles are well know in the prior art, having been described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,145,684. These particles consist of a crystalline drug substance having a surface modifier adsorbed on the surface of the particles such that the average particle size is less than about 400 mm. Low solubility of solid drugs prompted the pharmaceutical industry to create nanoparticles of such drugs which then can be administered systematically to provide bioavailability. Drug substances disclosed which can be made into nanoparticles include a variety of known classes of drugs.
In order to provide nanometer-size particles, the drug substance is comminuted in the presence of a surface active agent or, alternatively, the surface active agent is allowed to be adsorbed to the nanoparticulate drug substance after the process of comminution. The surface active agent prevents flocculation or congregation of the nanoparticles. The achievements of nanoparticulate technology in the pharmaceutical industry affords the opportunity to prepare parenteral formulations of water-insoluble or poorly water-soluble drugs. These formulations by their nature are suspensions rather than solutions since the particles are dispersed/suspended in a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle. Liposomes, emulsions and colloids when used as carriers for an active drug are also suspensions rather than solutions.
We have observed that intravascular adminstration of a suspensions to dogs causes significant cardiovascular dysfunction, such as reduction in arterial blood pressure and cardiac function, including heart rate cardiac output and ventricular contractility.
Other investigators have reported similar findings, for example: Slack et al., Acute Hemadynamic Effects and Blood Pool Kinetics of Polystyrene Microspheres Following Intravenous Administration, J. Pharm. Sci., 660, 1981; Faithfull et al., Cardiorespiratory Consequences of Flurocarbon Reactions in Dogs, Bio. Art. Organs, 1, 1988; and Lorenz et al, Histamine Release in Dogs by Cremophore EL and its Derivatives, Agents and Actions, 63, 1977.
It has now been discovered that hemodynamic effects of suspensions can be eliminated or at least substantially reduced by controlling the rate of infusion and/or the concentration of the active drug in the suspensions.
The present invention will be described particularly in reference to nanoparticulate crystalline drug formulations, however, the invention encompasses the use of other carriers for active drugs that do not form a solution but rather a suspension or dispersion having nanoparticulates in the range of less than 1000 nm.
This invention provides a method of administering a nanoparticulate composition to a mammal such as a dog or other sensitive species without eliciting adverse hemodynamic effects comprising:
intravenously administering to said dog an effective amount of a nanoparticulate drug composition at
The block copolymers useful herein are known compounds and/or can be readily prepared by techniques well known in the art.
Highly preferred surface modifiers include triblock copolymers of the PEOPBOPEOhaving molecular weights of 3800 and 5000 which are commercially available from Dow Chemical, Midland, Michigan, and are referred to as B20-3800 and B20-5000. These surface modifiers contain about 80% by weight PEO. In a preferred embodiment, the surface modifier is a triblock polymer having the structure:
##STR00001##
Q is an anionic group
The described particles can be prepared in a method comprising the steps of dispersing a therapeutic or diagnostic agent in a liquid dispersion medium and applying mechanical means in the presence of grinding media to reduce the particle size of the therapeutic or diagnostic agent to an effective average particle size of less than about 1000 nm, and preferably of less than about 400 nm. The particles can be reduced in size in the presence of a surface modifier. Alternatively, the particles can be contacted with a surface modifier after attrition.
The therapeutic or diagnostic agent selected is obtained commercially and/or prepared by techniques known in the art in a conventional coarse form. It is preferred, but not essential, that the particle size of the coarse therapeutic or diagnostic agent selected be less than about 10 mm as determined by sieve analysis. If the coarse particle size of the therapeutic or diagnostic agent is greater than about 100 mm, then it is preferred that the particles of the therapeutic or diagnostic agent be reduced in size to less than 100 mm using a conventional milling method such as airjet or fragmentation milling.
The coarse therapeutic or diagnostic agent selected can then be added to a liquid medium in which it is essentially insoluble to form a premix. The concentration of the therapeutic or diagnostic agent in the liquid medium can vary from about 0.1-60%, and preferably is from 5-30% (w/w). It is preferred, but not essential, that the surface modifier be present in the premix. The concentration of the surface modifier can vary from about 0.1 to about 90%, and preferably is 1-75%, more preferably 20-60%, by weight based on the total combined weight of the therapeutic or diagnostic agent and surface modifier. The apparent viscosity of the premix suspension is preferably less than about 1000 centipoise.
The premix can be used directly by subjecting it to mechanical means to reduce the average particle size in the dispersion to less than 1000 nm. It is preferred that the premix be used directly when a ball mill is used for attrition. Alternatively, the therapeutic or diagnostic agent and, optionally, the surface modifier, can be dispersed in the liquid medium using suitable agitation, e.g., a roller mill or a Cowles type mixer, until a homogeneous dispersion is observed in which there are no large agglomerates-visible to the naked eye. It is preferred that the premix be subjected to such a premilling dispersion step when a recirculating media mill is used for attrition. Alternatively, the therapeutic or diagnostic agnet and, optionally, the surface modifier, can be dispersed in the iquid medium using suitable agitiation, e.g., a roller mill or a Cowles type mixer, until a homogeneous dispersion is observed in which there are no large agglomerates visible to the naked eye. It is preferred that the premix be subjected to such a premilling dispersion step when a recirculating media mill is used for attrition.
The mechanical means applied to reduce the particle size of the therapeutic or diagnostic agent conveniently can take . the form of a dispersion mill. Suitable dispersion mills include a ball mill, an attritor mill, a vibratory mill, and media mills such as a sand mill and a bead mill. A media mill is preferred due to the relatively shorter milling time required to provide the intended result, desired reduction in particle size. For media milling, the apparent viscosity of the premix preferably is from about 100 to about 1000 centipoise. For ball milling, the apparent viscosity of the premix preferably is from about 1 up to about 100 centipoise. Such ranges tend to afford an optimal balance between efficient particle fragmentation and media erosion.
The attrition time can vary widely and depends primarily upon the particular mechanical means and processing conditions selected. For ball mills, processing times of up to five days or longer may be required. On the other hand, processing times of less than 1 day (residence times of one minute up to several hours) have provided the desired results using a high shear media mill.
The particles must be reduced in size at a temperature which does not significantly degrade the therapeutic or diagnostic agent. Processing temperatures of less than about 30°-40° C. are ordinarily preferred. If desired, the processing equipment can be cooled with conventional cooling equipment. The method is conveniently carried out under conditions of ambient temperature and at processing pressures which are safe and effective for the milling process. For example, ambient processing pressures are typical of ball mills, attritor mills and vibratory mills. Control of the temperature, e.g., by jacketing or immersion of the milling chamber in ice water are contemplated. Processing pressures from about 1 psi (0.07 kg/cm2) up to about 50 psi (3.5 kg/cm2) are contemplated. Processing pressures from about 10 psi (0.7 kg/cm2) to about 20 psi 1.4 kg/cm2)
The surface modifier, if it was not present in the premix, must be added to the dispersion after attrition in an amount as described for the premix above. Thereafter, the dispersion can be mixed, e.g., by shaking vigorously. Optionally, the dispersion can be subjected to a sonication step, e.g., using an ultrasonic power supply. For example, the dispersion can be subjected to ultrasonic energy having a frequency of 20-80 kHz for a time of about 1 to 120 seconds.
After attrition is completed, the grinding media is separated from the milled particulate product (in either a dry or liquid dispersion form) using conventional separation techniques, such as by filtration, sieving through a mesh screen, and the like.
The grinding media for the particle size reduction step can be selected from rigid media preferably spherical or particulate in form having an average size less than about 3 mm and, more preferably, less than about 1 mm. Such media desirably can provide the particles with shorter processing times and impart less wear to the milling equipment. The selection of material for the grinding media is not believed to be critical. We have found that zirconium oxide, such as 95% ZrO2 stabilized with magnesia, zirconium silicate, and glass grinding media provide particles having levels of contamination which are believed to be acceptable for the preparation of pharmaceutical compositions. However, other media, such as stainless steel, titania, alumina, and 95% ZrO2 stabilized with yttrium, are expected to be useful. Preferred media have a density greater than about 3 g/cm3.
The grinding media can comprise particles, preferably substantially spherical in shape, e.g., beads, consisting essentially of polymeric resin. Alternatively, the grinding media can comprise particles comprising a core having a coating of the polymeric resin adhered thereon.
In general, polymeric resins suitable for use herein are chemically and physically inert, substantially free of metals, solvent and monomers, and of sufficient hardness and friability to enable them to avoid being chipped or crushed during grinding. Suitable polymeric resins include crosslinked polystyrenes, such as polystyrene crosslinked with divinylbenzene, styrene copolymers, polycarbonates, polyacetals, such as Delrin™, vinyl chloride polymers and copolymers, polyurethanes, polyamides, poly (tetrafluoroethylenes), e.g., Teflon™, and other fluoropolymers, high density polyethylenes, polypropylenes, cellulose ethers and esters such as cellulose acetate, polyhydroxymethacrylate, polyhydroxyethyl acrylate, silicone containing polymers such as polysiloxanes and the like. The polymer can be biodegradable. Exemplary biodegradable polymers include poly(lactides), poly (glycolide) copolymers of lactides and glycolide, polyanhydrides, poly(hydroxyethyl methacylate), poly (imino carbonates), poly(N-acylhydroxyproline)esters, poly (N-palmitoyl hydroxyproline) esters, ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, poly(orthoesters), poly(caprolactones), and poly(phosphazenes). In the case of biodegradable polymers, contamination from the media itself advantageously can metabolize in vivo into biologically acceptable products which can be eliminated from the body.
The polymeric resin can have a density from 0.8 to 3.0 g/cm3. Higher density resins are preferred inasmuch as it is believed that these provide more efficient particle size reduction.
The media can range in size from about 0.1 to 3 mm. For fine grinding, the particles preferably are from 0.2 to 2 mm, more preferably, 0.25 to 1 mm in size.
In a particularly preferred method, a therapeutic or diagnostic agent is prepared in the form of submicron particles by grinding the agent in the presence of a grinding media having a mean particle size of less than about 75 microns.
The core material of the grinding media preferably can be selected from materials known to be useful as grinding media when fabricated as spheres or particles. Suitable core materials include zirconium oxides (such as 95% zirconium oxide stabilized with magnesia or yttrium), zirconium silicate, glass, stainless steel, titania, alumina, ferrite and the like. Preferred core materials have a density greater than about 2.5 g/cm3. The selection of high density core materials is believed to facilitate efficient particle size reduction.
Useful thicknesses of the polymer coating on the core are believed to range from about 1 to about 500 microns, although other thicknesses outside this range may be useful in some applications. The thickness of the polymer coating preferably is less than the diameter of the core.
The cores can be coated with the polymeric resin by techniques known in the art. Suitable techniques include spray coating, fluidized bed coating, and melt coating. Adhesion promoting or tie layers can optionally be provided to improve the adhesion between the core material and the resin coating. The adhesion of the polymer coating to the core material can be enhanced by treating the core material to adhesion promoting procedures, such as roughening of the core surface, corona discharge treatment, and the like.
In a preferred grinding process, the particles are made continuously rather than in a batch mode. The continuous method comprises the steps of continuously introducing the therapeutic or diagnostic agent and rigid grinding media into a milling chamber, contacting the agent with the grinding media while in the chamber to reduce the particle size of the agent, continuously removing the agent and the grinding media from the milling chamber, and thereafter separating the agent from the grinding media.
The therapeutic or diagnostic agent and the grinding media are continuously removed from the milling chamber. Thereafter, the grinding media is separated from the milled particulate agent (in either a dry or liquid dispersion form) using conventional separation techniques, in a secondary process such as by simple filtration, sieving through a mesh filter or screen, and the like. Other separation techniques such as centrifugation may also be employed.
In a preferred embodiment, the agent and grinding media are recirculated through the milling chamber. Examples of suitable means to effect such recirculation include conventional pumps such as peristaltic pumps, diaphragm pumps, piston pumps, centrifugal pumps and other positive displacement pumps which do not use sufficiently close tolerances to damage the grinding media. Peristaltic pumps are generally preferred.
Another variation of the continuous process includes the use of mixed media sizes. For example, larger media may be employed in a conventional manner where such media is restricted to the milling chamber. Smaller grinding media may be continuously recirculated through the system and permitted to pass through the agitated bed of larger grinding media. In this embodiment, the smaller media is preferably between about 1 and 300 mm in mean particle size and the larger grinding media is between about 300 and 1000 mm in mean particle size.
Another method of forming the desired nanoparticle dispersion is by microprecipitation. This is a method of preparing stable dispersions of therapeutic and diagnostic agents in the presence of a surface modifying and colloid stability enhancing surface active agent free of trace of any toxic solvents or solubilized heavy metal inpurities by the following procedural steps:
1.Dissolving the therapeutic or diagnostic agent in aqueous base with stirring,
2. Adding above #1 formulation with stirring to a surface active surfactant (or surface modifiers) solution to form a clear solution, and
3. Neutralizing above formulation #2 with stirring with an appropriate acid solution. The procedure can be followed by:
4. Removal of formed salt by dialysis or diafiltration and
5. Concentration of dispersion by conventional means.
This microprecipitation process produces dispersion of therapeutic or diagnostic agents with Z-average particle diameter less than 400 nm (as measured by photon correlation spectroscopy) that are stable in particle size upon keeping under room temperature or refrigerated conditions. Such dispersions also demonstrate limited particle size growth upon autoclave-decontamination conditions used for standard blood-pool pharmaceutical agents.
Step 3 can be carried out in semicontinuous, continuous batch, or continuous methods at constant flow rates of the reacting components in computercontrolled reactors or in tubular reactors where reaction pH can be kept constant using pH-stat systems. Advantages of such modifications are that they provide cheaper manufacturing procedures for large-scale production of nanoparticulate dispersion systems.
Additional surface modifier may be added to the dispersion after precipitation. Thereafter, the dispersion can be mixed, e.g., by shaking vigorously. Optionally, the dispersion can be subjected to a sonicationstep, e.g., using an ultrasonic power supply. For example, the dispersion can be subjected to ultrasonic energy having a frequency of 20-80 kHz for a time of about 1 to 120 seconds.
In a preferred embodiment, the above procedure is followed with step 4 which comprises removing the formed salts by diafiltration or dialysis. This is done in the case of dialysis by standard dialysis equipment and by diafiltration using standard diafiltration equipment known in the art. Preferably, the final step is concentration to a desired concentration of the agent dispersion. This is done either by diafiltration or evaporation using standard equipment known in this art
An advantage of microprecipitation is that unlike milled dispersion, the final product is free of heavy metal contaminants arising from the milling media that must be removed due to their toxicity before product is formulated.
A further advantage of the microprecipitation method is that unlike solvent precipitation, the final product is free of any trace of trace solvents that may be toxic and must be removed by expensive treatments prior to final product formulation.
In another preferred embodiment of the microprecipitation process, a crystal growth modifier is used. A crystal growth modifier is defined as a compound that in the co-precipitation process incorporates into the crystal structure of the microprecipitated crystals of the pharmaceutical agent, thereby hindering growth or enlargement of the microcrystalline precipitate, by the so called Ostwald ripening process. A crystal growth modifier (or a CGM) is a chemical that is at least 75% identical in chemical structure to the pharmaceuticl agent. By “identical” is meant that the structures are identical atom for atom and their connectivity. Structural identity is charactarized as having 75% of the chemical structure, on a molecular weight basis, identical to the therapeutic or diagnostic agent. The remaining 25% of the structure may be absent or replaced by different chemical structure in the CGM. The crystal growth modifier is dissolved in step #1 with the therapeutic or diagnostic agent.
As used herein, particle size refers to a number average particle size as measured by conventional particle size measuring techniques well known to those skilled in the art, such as sedimentation field flow fractionation, photon correlation spectroscopy, or disk centrifugation. When photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS) is used as the method of particle sizing the average particle diameter is the Z-average particle diameter known to those skilled in the art. By “an effective average particle size of less than about 1000 nm” it is meant that at least 90% of the particles have a weight average particle size of less than about 1000 nm when measured by the above-noted techniques. In preferred embodiments, the effective average particle size is less than about 400 nm and more preferrably less than about 300 nm. In some embodiments, an effective average particle size of less than about 100 nm has been achieved. With reference to the effective average particle size, it is preferred that at least 95% and, more preferably, at least 99% of the particles have a particle size less than the effective average, e.g., 1000 nm. In particularly preferred embodiments essentially all of the particles have a size less than 1000 nm. In some embodiments, essentially all of the particles have a size less than 400 nm.
The relative amount of therapeutic or diagnostic agent and surface modifier can vary widely and the optimal amount of the surface modifier can depend, for example, upon the particular therapeutic or diagnostic agent and surface modifier selected, the critical micelle concentration of the surface modifier if it forms micelles, the hydrophilic lipophilic balance (HLB) of the stabilizer, the melting point of the stabilizer, its water solubility, the surface tension of water solutions of the stabilizer, etc. The surface modifier preferably is present in an amount of about 0.1-10 mg per square meter surface area of the therapeutic or diagnostic agent. The surface modifier can be present in an amount of 0.1-90%, preferably 20-60% by weight based on the total weight of the dry particle.
A method for diagnostic imaging for use in medical procedures in accordance with this invention comprises intravenously administering to the body of a test subject in need of a diagnostic image an effective contrast producing amount of the diagnostic image contrast composition. Thereafter, at least a portion of the body containing the administered contrast agent is exposed to x-rays or a magnetic field to produce an x-ray or magnetic resonance image pattern corresponding to the presence of the contrast agent. The image pattern can then be visualized.
Any x-ray visualization technique, preferably, a high contrast technique such as computed tomography, can be applied in a conventional manner. Alternatively, the image pattern can be observed directly on an x-ray sensitive phosphor screen-silver halide photographic film combination or by use of a storage phosphor screen.
Visualization with a magnetic resonance imaging system can be accomplished with commercially available magnetic imaging systems such as a General Electric 1.5 T Sigma imaging system [1H resonant frequency 63.9 megahertz (MHz)]. Commercially available magnetic resonance imaging systems are typically characterized by the magnetic field strength used, with a field strength of 2.0 Tesla as the current maximum and 0.2 Tesla as the current minimum. For a given field strength, each detected nucleus has a characteristic frequency. For example, at a field strength of 1.0 Tesla, the resonance frequency for hydrogen is 42.57 10 MHz; for phosphorus-31 it is 17.24 MHz; and for sodium23 it is 11.26 Mhz.
A contrast effective amount of the diagnostic agent containing composition is that amount necessary to provide tissue visualization with, for example, magnetic resonance imaging or x-ray imaging. Means for determining a contrast effective amount in a particular subject will depend, as is well known in the art, on the nature of the magnetically reactive material used, the mass of the subject being imaged, the sensitivity of the magnetic resonance or x-ray imaging system and the like.
After administration of the compositions, the subject is maintained for a time period sufficient for the administered compositions to be distributed throughout the subject and enter the tissues of the mammal. Typically, a sufficient time period is from about 20 minutes to about 90 minutes and, preferably from about 20 minutes to about 60 minutes.
The invention has been described with particular reference to preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention.
Liversidge, Gary G., Liversidge, Elaine, de Garavilla, Lawrence
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10117936, | Mar 15 2013 | Tonix Pharma Holdings Limited | Eutectic formulations of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride and amitriptyline hydrochloride |
10322094, | Mar 15 2013 | Tonix Pharma Holdings Limited | Eutectic formulations of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride and amitriptyline hydrochloride |
10357465, | Sep 18 2014 | TONIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC ; Tonix Pharma Holdings Limited | Eutectic formulations of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride |
10500165, | Jul 03 2014 | CSPC ZHONGQI PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLOGY SHIJIAZHUANG CO , LTD | Purified therapeutic nanoparticles and preparation methods thereof |
10722478, | Jun 24 2010 | Tonix Pharma Holdings Limited | Methods and compositions for treating fatigue associated with disordered sleep using very low dose cyclobenzaprine |
10736859, | Mar 15 2013 | Tonix Pharma Holdings Limited | Eutectic formulations of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride and amitriptyline hydrochloride |
10864175, | Mar 15 2013 | Tonix Pharma Holdings Limited | Eutectic formulations of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride and amitriptyline hydrochloride |
10864176, | Mar 15 2013 | Tonix Pharma Holdings Limited | Eutectic formulations of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride and amitriptyline hydrochloride |
11026898, | Sep 18 2014 | Tonix Pharma Holdings Limited | Eutectic formulations of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride |
11464871, | Oct 02 2012 | Novartis AG | Methods and systems for polymer precipitation and generation of particles |
11737991, | Mar 15 2013 | Tonix Pharma Holdings Limited | Eutectic formulations of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride and amitriptyline hydrochloride |
11826321, | Dec 11 2017 | Tonix Pharma Holdings Limited | Cyclobenzaprine treatment for agitation, psychosis and cognitive decline in dementia and neurodegenerative conditions |
11839594, | Mar 15 2013 | Tonix Pharma Holdings Limited | Eutectic formulations of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride and amitriptyline hydrochloride |
11998516, | Mar 07 2011 | Tonix Pharma Holdings Limited | Methods and compositions for treating depression using cyclobenzaprine |
9149464, | Nov 12 2012 | IGNYTA, INC. | Bendamustine derivatives and methods of using same |
9150517, | Nov 12 2012 | IGNYTA, INC. | Bendamustine derivatives and methods of using same |
9452988, | Nov 12 2012 | Cephalon, Inc | Bendamustine derivatives and methods of using same |
9474728, | Jun 24 2010 | Tonix Pharma Holdings Limited | Methods and compositions for treating fatigue associated with disordered sleep using very low dose cyclobenzaprine |
9610360, | Jan 24 2007 | CERULIEAN PHARMA INC. | Polymer drug conjugates with tether groups for controlled drug delivery |
9630926, | Nov 12 2012 | IGNYTA, INC. | Bendamustine derivatives and methods of using same |
9636408, | Mar 15 2013 | Tonix Pharma Holdings Limited | Eutectic formulations of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride and amitriptyline hydrochloride |
9913827, | Nov 12 2012 | IGNYTA, INC. | Bendamustine derivatives and methods of using same |
9918948, | Nov 20 2009 | TONIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC ; Tonix Pharma Holdings Limited | Methods and compositions for treating symptoms associated with post-traumatic stress disorder using cyclobenzaprine |
9956188, | Mar 15 2013 | Tonix Pharma Holdings Limited | Eutectic formulations of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride and amitriptyline hydrochloride |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4006025, | Jun 06 1975 | Polaroid Corporation | Process for dispersing sensitizing dyes |
4855221, | Jul 13 1987 | Eastman Kodak Company | Photographic elements having oxonol dyes |
4973465, | Dec 05 1986 | LEADIANT BIOSCIENCES LIMITED | Microcrystals comprising an active substance having an affinity for phospholipids, and at least one phospholipid, process of preparation |
5013556, | Oct 20 1989 | LIPOSOME TECHNOLOGY, INC | Liposomes with enhanced circulation time |
5091188, | Apr 26 1990 | PAUL ROYALTY FUND, L P | Phospholipid-coated microcrystals: injectable formulations of water-insoluble drugs |
5118528, | Dec 31 1986 | Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique | Process for the preparation of dispersible colloidal systems of a substance in the form of nanoparticles |
5145684, | Jan 25 1991 | Elan Pharma International Limited; Elan Corporation, PLC | Surface modified drug nanoparticles |
5175287, | Sep 25 1986 | Stanford University | Process for preparing 1,2,4-benzotriazine oxides |
5188837, | Nov 13 1989 | Scios INC | Lipsopheres for controlled delivery of substances |
5318767, | Jan 25 1991 | Elan Corporation, PLC; Elan Pharma International Limited | X-ray contrast compositions useful in medical imaging |
5399363, | Jan 25 1991 | Elan Corporation, PLC; ELAN PHARMA INTERNATIONAL LTD | Surface modified anticancer nanoparticles |
5565188, | Feb 24 1995 | Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited | Polyalkylene block copolymers as surface modifiers for nanoparticles |
5834025, | Aug 14 1996 | BAUDAX BIO, INC ; RECRO PHARMA, INC | Reduction of intravenously administered nanoparticulate-formulation-induced adverse physiological reactions |
DE3722837, | |||
EP233559, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 06 2008 | Elan Pharma International Limited | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Aug 02 2011 | Elan Pharma International Limited | EDT PHARMA HOLDINGS LIMITED | ASSET TRANSFER AGREEMENT | 032672 | /0001 | |
Sep 14 2011 | EDT PHARMA HOLDINGS LIMITED | Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032661 | /0663 | |
Sep 16 2011 | Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT SECOND LIEN | 026994 | /0245 | |
Sep 16 2011 | ALKERMES, INC | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT SECOND LIEN | 026994 | /0245 | |
Sep 16 2011 | ALKERMES CONTROLLED THERAPEUTICS INC | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT FIRST LIEN | 026994 | /0186 | |
Sep 16 2011 | Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT FIRST LIEN | 026994 | /0186 | |
Sep 16 2011 | ALKERMES, INC | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT FIRST LIEN | 026994 | /0186 | |
Sep 16 2011 | ALKERMES CONTROLLED THERAPEUTICS INC | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT SECOND LIEN | 026994 | /0245 | |
Sep 24 2012 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | ALKERMES, INC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SECOND LIEN | 029116 | /0379 | |
Sep 24 2012 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | ALKERMES CONTROLLED THERAPEUTICS INC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SECOND LIEN | 029116 | /0379 | |
Sep 24 2012 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SECOND LIEN | 029116 | /0379 | |
May 08 2014 | Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited | Alkermes Science One Limited | PROPERTY TRANSFER AGREEMENT | 033522 | /0048 | |
Aug 12 2014 | Alkermes Science One Limited | DARAVITA LIMITED | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 035279 | /0701 | |
Apr 10 2015 | DV TECHNOLOGY LLC | Recro Technology LLC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 035446 | /0904 | |
Apr 10 2015 | Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited | DV TECHNOLOGY LLC | ASSET TRANSFER AND LICENSE AGREEMENT | 035410 | /0001 | |
Apr 10 2015 | DARAVITA LIMITED | Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited | BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT | 035409 | /0831 | |
Apr 10 2015 | Recro Technology LLC | ORBIMED ROYALTY OPPORTUNITIES II, LP | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 035403 | /0288 | |
Apr 22 2015 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | DARAVITA LIMITED F K A ALKERMES SCIENCE ONE LIMITED, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO ALKERMES PHARMA IRELAND LIMITED | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 035505 | /0696 | |
Nov 17 2017 | ORBIMED ROYALTY OPPORTUNITIES II, LP | RECRO GAINESVILLE LLC F K A RECRO TECHNOLOGY LLC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 044164 | /0008 | |
Nov 21 2019 | RECRO PHARMA, INC | BAUDAX BIO, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 051671 | /0536 | |
Nov 21 2019 | Recro Gainesville LLC | RECRO PHARMA, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 051670 | /0524 | |
May 29 2020 | BAUDAX BIO LIMITED | WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 052891 | /0590 | |
May 29 2020 | BAUDAX BIO N A LLC | WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 052891 | /0590 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 26 2013 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 26 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 26 2014 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 26 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 26 2017 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 26 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 26 2018 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 26 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 26 2021 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 26 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 26 2022 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 26 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |