Relating to binding proteins for recognition of DNA

Abstract

Disclosed are libraries of dna sequences encoding zinc finger binding motifs for display on a particle, together with methods of designing zinc finger binding polypeptides for binding to a particular target sequence and, inter alia, use of designed zinc finger polypeptides for various in vitro or in vivo applications.

Description

This application an alignment of the triethylatnine triethylamine for 5 min and neutralised with an equal volume of 1M Tris pH7.4. Log phase E. coli TG1 in 2×TY were infected with eluted phage for 30 min at 37° C. and plated as described above. Phage titres were determined by plating serial dilutions of the infected bacteria.

The phage selection procedure, based on affinity purification, is illustrated schematically in FIG. 1: zinc fingers (A) are expressed on the surface of fd phage(B) as fusions to the the minor coat protein (C). The third finger is mainly obscured by the DNA helix. Zinc finger phage are bound to 5′-biotinylated DNA oligonucleotide [D ] attached to streptavidin-coated paramagnetic beads [E ], and captured using a magnet [F ]. (Figure adapted from Dynal AS and also Marks et al. (1992 J. Biol. Chem. 267, 16007-16105).

FIG. 3 shows sequences (Seq ID No.s 3-8) of DNA oligonucleotides used to purify (i) phage displaying the first three fingers of TFIIIA, (ii) phage displaying the three fingers of Zif268, and (iii) zinc finger phage from the phage display library. The Zif268 consensus operator sequence used in the X-ray crystal structure (Pavletich & Pabo 1991 Science 252, 809-817) is highlighted in (ii), and in (iii) where “X” denotes a base change from the ideal operator in oligonucleotides used to purify phage with new specificities. Biotinylation of one strand is shown by a circled “B”.

Sequencing of Selected Phage

Single colonies of transformants obtained after three rounds of selection as described, were grown overnight in 2×TY/Zn/Tct. Small aliquots of the cultures were stored in 15% glycerol at −20° C., to be used as an archive. Single-stranded DNA was prepared from phage in the culture supernatant and sequenced using the modified T7 RNA polymerase SEQUENASE™ 2.0 kit (U.S. Biochemical Corp.).

Results and Discussion

Phage display of 3-finger DNA-Binding Domains from TFIIIA or Zif268. Prior to the construction of a phage display library, the inventors demonstrated that peptides containing three fully functional zinc fingers could be displayed on the surface of viable fd phage when cloned in the vector Fd-Tet-SN. In preliminary experiments, the inventors cloned as fusions to pill firstly the three N-terminal fingers from TFIIIA (Ginsberg et al., 1984 Cell 39, 479-489), and secondly the three fingers from Zif268 (Christy et al., 1988), for both of which the DNA binding sites are known. Peptide fused to the minor coat protein was detected in Western blots using an anti-pIII antibody (Stengele et al., 1990 J. Mol. Biol. 212, 143-149). Approximately 10-20% of total P-III in phage preparations was present as fusion protein.

Phage displaying either set of fingers were capable of binding to specific DNA oligonucleotides, indicating that zinc fingers were expressed and correctly folded in both instances. Paramagnetic beads coated with specific oligonucleotide were used as a medium on which to capture DNA-binding phage, and were consistently able to return between 100 and 500-fold more such phage, compared to free beads or beads coated with non-specific DNA. Alternatively, when phage displaying the three fingers of Zif268 were diluted 1:1.7×10⁵ with Fd-Tet-SN phage not bearing zinc fingers, and the mixture incubated with beads coated with Zif268 operator DNA, one in three of the total phage eluted and transfected into E. coli were shown by colony hybridisation to carry the Zif268 gene, indicating an enrichment factor of over 500 for the zinc finger phage. Hence it is clear that zinc fingers displayed on fd phage are capable of preferential binding to DNA sequences with which they can form specific complexes, making possible the enrichment of wanted phage by factors of up to 500 in a single affinity purification step. Therefore, over multiple rounds of selection and amplification, very rare clones capable of sequence-specific DNA binding can be selected-from a large library.

A phage display library of zinc fingers from Zif268. The inventors have made a phage display library of the three fingers of Zif268 in which selected residues in the middle finger are randomised (FIG. 2), and have isolated phage bearing zinc fingers with desired specificity using a modified Zif268 operator sequence (Christy & Nathans 1989 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 8737-8741) in which the middle DNA triplet is altered to the sequence of interest (FIG. 3). In order to be able to study both the primary and secondary putative base recognition positions which are suggested by database analysis (Jacobs 1992 EMBO J. 11, 4507-4517), the inventors have designed the library of the middle finger so that, relative to the first residue in the α-helix (position +1), positions −1 to +8, but excluding the conserved Leu and His, can be any amino acid except Phe, Tyr, Trp and Cys which occur only rarely at those positions (Jacobs 1993 Ph.D. thesis. University of Cambridge). In addition, the inventors have allowed position +9 (which might make an inter-finger contact with Ser at position −2 (Pavletich & Pabo 1991)) to be either Arg or Lys, the two most frequently occurring residues at that position.

The logic of this protocol, based upon the Zif268 crystal structure (Pavletich & Pabo 1991), is that the randomised finger is directed to the central triplet since the overall register of protein-DNA contacts is fixed by its two neighbours. This allows the examination of which amino acids in the randomised finger are the most important in forming specific complexes with DNA of known sequence. Since comprehensive variations are programmed in all the putative contact positions of the α-helix, it is possible to conduct an objective study of the importance of each position in DNA-binding (Jacobs 1992).

The size of the phage display library required, assuming full degeneracy of the 8 variable positions, is (16⁷×2¹)=5.4×10⁸, but because of practical limitations in the efficiency of transformation with Fd-Tet-SN, the inventors were able to clone only 2.6×10⁶ of these. The library used is therefore some two hundred times smaller than the theoretical size necessary to cover all the possible variations of the α-helix. Despite this shortfall, it has been possible to isolate phage which bind with high affinity and specificity to given DNA sequences, demonstrating the remarkable versatility of the zinc finger motif.

Amino acid-base contacts in zinc finger-DNA complexes deduced from phage display selection. Of the 64 base triplets that could possibly form the binding site for variations of finger 2, the inventors have so far used 32 in attempts to isolate zinc finger phage as described. Results from these selections are shown in Table 1, which lists amino acid sequences (Seq ID Nos. 52-118) of the variant α-helical regions from clones of library phage selected after 3 rounds of screening with variants of the Zif268 operator.

TABLE 1

##STR00001##
##STR00002##
##STR00003##

In Table 1, the amino acid sequences, aligned in the one letter code, are listed alongside the DNA oligonucleotides (a to p) used in their purification. The latter are denoted by the sequence of the central DNA triplet in the “bound” strand of the variant Zif268 operator. The amino acid positions are numbered relative to the first helical residue (position 1), and the three primary recognition positions are highlighted. The accompanying numbers indicate the independent occurrences of that clone in the sequenced population (5-10 colonies); where numbers are in parentheses, the clone(s) were detected in the penultimate round of selection but not in the final round. In addition to the DNA triplets shown here, others were also used in attempts to select zinc finger phage from the library, but most selected two clones, one having the α-helical sequence KASNLVSHIR, (Seq ID No. 119) and the other having the sequence LRHNLETHMR (Seq ID No. 120). Those triplets were: ACT, AAA, TTT, CCT, CTT, TTC, AGT, CGA, CAT, AGA, AGC and AAT.

In general the inventors have been unable to select zinc fingers which bind specifically to triplets without a 5′ or 3′ guanine, all of which return the same limited set of phage after three rounds of selection (see). However for each of the other triplets used to screen the library, a family of zinc finger phage is recovered. In these families is found a sequence bias in the randomised α-helix, which is interpreted as revealing the position and identity of amino acids used to contact the DNA. For instance: the middle fingers from the 8 different clones selected with the triplet GAT (Table 1d) all have Asn at position +3 and Arg at position +6, just as does the first zinc finger of the Drosophila protein tramtrack in which they are seen making contacts to the same triplet in the cocrystal with specific DNA(Fairall et al., 1993). This indicates that the positional recurrence of a particular amino acid in functionally equivalent fingers is unlikely to be coincidental, but rather because it has a functional role. Thus using data collected from the phage display library (Table 1) it is possible to infer most of the specific amino acid-DNA interactions. Remarkably, most of the results can be rationalised in terms of contacts from the three primary α-helical positions (−1, +3 and +6) identified by X-ray crystallography (Pavletich & Pabo 1991) and database analysis (Jacobs 1992).

As has been pointed out before (Berg 1992 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 11109-11110), guanine has a particularly important role in zinc finger-DNA interactions. When present at the 5′ (e.g. Table 1c-i) or 3′ (e.g. Table 1m-o) end of a triplet, G selects fingers with Arg at position +6 or −1 of the α-helix respectively. When G is present in the middle position of a triplet (e.g. Table 1b), the preferred amino acid at position +3 is His. Occasionally, G at the 5′ end of a triplet selects Ser or Thr at +6 (e.g. Table 1p). Since G can only be specified absolutely by Arg (Seeman et al., 1976 Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 73, 804-808), this is the most common determinant at −1 and +6. One can expect this type of contact to be a bidentate hydrogen bonding interaction as seen in the crystal structures of Zif268 (Pavletich & Pabo 1991 Science 252, 809-817) and tramtrack (Fairall et al., 1993). In these structures, and in almost all of the selected fingers in which Arg recognises G at the 3′ end, Asp occurs at position +2 to buttress the long Arg side chain (e.g. Table 1o,p). When position −1 is not Arg, Asp rarely occurs at +2, suggesting that in this case any other contacts it might make with the second DNA strand do not contribute significantly to the stability the protein-DNA complex.

Adenine is also an important determinant of sequence specificity, recognised almost exclusively by Asn or Gln which again are able to make bidentate contacts (Seeman et al., 1976). When A is present at the 3′ end of a triplet, Gln is often selected at position −1 of the α-helix, accompanied by small aliphatic residues at +2 (e.g. Table 1b). Adenine in the middle of the triplet strongly selects Asn at +3 (e.g. Table 1c-e), except in the triplet CAG (Table 1a) which selected only two types of finger, both with His at +3 (one being the wild-type Zif268 which contaminated the library during this experiment). The triplets ACG (Table 1j) and ATG (Table 1k), which have A at the 5′ end, also returned oligoclonal mixtures of phage, the majority of which were of one clone with Asn at +6.

In theory, cytosine and thymine cannot reliably be discriminated by a hydrogen bonding amino acid side chain in the major groove (Seeman et al., 1976). Nevertheless, C in the 3′ position of a triplet shows a marked preference for Asp or Glu at position −1, together with Arg at +1 (e.g. Table 1e.g.). Asp is also sometimes selected at +3 and +6 when C is in the middle (e.g. Table 1o) and 5′ (e-g. Table 1a) position respectively. Although Asp can accept a hydrogen bond from the amino group of C, one should note that the positive molecular charge of C in the major groove (Hunter 1993 J. Mol. Biol. 230, 1025-1054) will favour an interaction with Asp regardless of hydrogen bonding contacts.

However, C in the middle position most frequently selects Thr (e.g. Table 1i), Val or Leu (e.g. Table 1o) at +3. Similarly, T in the middle position most often selects Ser (e.g. Table 1i), Ala or Val (e.g. Table 1p) at +3. The aliphatic amino acids are unable to make hydrogen bonds but Ala probably has a hydrophobic interaction with the methyl group of T, whereas a longer side chain such as Leu can exclude T and pack against the ring of C. When T is at the 5′ end of a triplet, Ser and Thr are selected at +6 (as is occasionally the case for G at the 5′ end). Thymine at the 3′ end of a triplet selects a variety of polar amino acids at −1 (e.g. Table 1d), and occasionally returns fingers with Ser at +2 (e.g. Table 1a) which could make a contact as seen in the tramtrack crystal structure (Fairall et al., 1993).

Limitations of Phage Display

From Table 1 it can be seen that a consensus or bias usually occurs in two of the three primary positions (−1, +3 and +6) for any family of equivalent fingers, suggesting that in many cases phage selection is by virtue of only two base contacts per finger, as is observed in the Zif268 crystal structure (Pavletich & Pabo 1991). Accordingly, identical finger sequences are often returned by DNA sequences differing by one base in the central triplet. One reason for this is that the phage display selection, being essentially purification by affinity, can yield zinc fingers which bind equally tightly to a number of DNA triplets and so are unable to discriminate. Secondly, since complex formation is governed by the law of mass action, affinity selection can favour those clones whose representation in the library is greatest even though their true affinity for DNA is less than that of other clones less abundant in the library. Phage display selection by affinity is therefore of limited value in distinguishing between permissive and specific interactions beyond those base contacts necessary to stabilise the complex. Thus in the absence of competition from fingers which are able to bind specifically to a given DNA, the tightest non-specific complexes will be selected from the phage library. Consequently, results obtained by phage display selection from a library must be confirmed by specificity assays, particularly when that library is of limited size.

Conclusion

The amino acid sequence biases observed within a family of functionally equivalent zinc fingers indicate that, of the a-helical positions randomised in this study, only three primary (−1, +3 and +6) and one auxiliary (+2) positions are involved in recognition of DNA. Moreover, a limited set of amino acids are to be found at those positions, and it is presumed that these make contacts to bases. The indications therefore are that a code can be derived to describe zinc finger-DNA interactions. At this stage however, although sequence homologies are strongly suggestive of amino acid preferences for particular base-pairs, one cannot confidently deduce such rules until the specificity of individual fingers for DNA triplets is confirmed. The inventors therefore defer making a summary table of these preferences until the following example, in which is described how randomised DNA binding sites can be used to this end.

While this work was in progress, a paper by Rebar and Pabo was published (Rebar & Pabo 1994 Science 263, 671-673) in which phage display was also used to select zinc fingers with new DNA-binding specificities. These authors constructed a library in which the first finger of Zif268 is randomised, and screened with tetranucleotides to take into account end effects such as additional contacts from variants of this finger. Only 4 positions (−1, +2, +3 and +6) were randomised, chosen on the basis of the earlier X-ray crystal structures. The results presented above, in which more positions were randomised, to some extent justifies Rebar and Pabo's use of the four random positions without apparent loss of effect, although further selections may reveal that the library is compromised. However, randomising only four positions decreases the theoretical library size so that full degeneracy can be achieved in practice. Nevertheless the inventors found that the results obtained by Rebar and Pabo by screening their complete library with two variant Zif268 operators, are in agreement with their conclusions derived from an incomplete library. On the one hand this again highlights the versatility of zinc fingers but, remarkably, so far both studies have been unable to produce fingers which bind to the sequence CCT. It will be interesting to see whether sequence biases such as we have detected would be revealed, if more selections were performed using Rebar and Pabo's library. In any case, it would be desirable to investigate the effects on selections of using different numbers of randomised positions in more complete libraries than have been used so far.

The original position or context of the randomised finger in the phage display library might bear on the efficacy of selected fingers when incorporated into a new DNA-binding domain. Selections from a library of the outer fingers of a three finger peptide (Rebar & Pabo, 1994 Science 263, 671-673; Jamieson et al., 1994 Biochemistry 33, 5689-5695) are capable of producing fingers which bind DNA in various different modes, while selections from a library of the middle finger should produce motifs which are more constrained. Accordingly, Rebar and Pabo do not assume that the first finger of Zif268 will always bind a triplet, and screened with a tetranucleotide binding site to allow for different binding modes. Thus motifs selected from libraries of the outer fingers might prove less amenable to the assembly of multifinger proteins, since binding of these fingers could be perturbed on constraining them to a particular binding mode, as would be the case for fingers which had to occupy the middle position of an assembled three-finger protein. In contrast, motifs selected from libraries of the middle finger, having been originally constrained, will presumably be able to preserve their mode of binding even when placed in the outer positions of an assembled DNA-binding domain.

FIGS. 10A-10C shows different strategies for the design of tailored zinc finger proteins. (A) A three-finger DNA-binding motif is selected en bloc from a library of three randomised fingers. (B) A three-finger DNA-binding motif is assembled out of independently selected fingers from a library of one randomised finger (e.g. the middle finger of Zif268). (C) A three-finger DNA-binding motif is assembled out of independently selected fingers from three positionally specified libraries of randomised zinc fingers.

FIG. 11 illustrates the strategy of combinatorial assembly followed by en bloc selection. Groups of triplet-specific zinc fingers (A) isolated by phage display selection are assembled in random combinations and re-displayed on phage (B). A full-length target site (C) is used to select en bloc the most favourable combination of fingers (D).

EXAMPLE 2

This example describes a new technique to deal efficiently with the selection of a DNA binding site for a given zinc finger (essentially the converse of example 1). This is desirable as a safeguard against spurious selections based on the screening of display libraries. This may be done by screening against libraries of DNA triplet binding sites randomised in two positions but having one base fixed in the third position. The technique is applied here to determine the specificity of fingers previously selected by phage display. The inventors found that some of these fingers are able to specify a unique base in each position of the cognate triplet. This is further illustrated by examples of fingers which can discriminate between closely related triplets as measured by their respective equilibrium dissociation constants. Comparing the amino acid sequences of fingers which specify a particular base in a triplet, we infer that in most instances, sequence specific binding of zinc fingers to DNA can be achieved using a small set of amino acid-base contacts amenable to a code.

One can determine the optimal binding sites of these (and other) proteins, by selection from libraries of randomised DNA. This approach, the principle of which is essentially the converse of zinc finger phage display, would provide an equally informative database from which the same rules can be independently deduced. However until now, the favoured method for binding site determination (involving iterative selection and amplification of target DNA followed by sequencing), has been a laborious process not conveniently applicable to the analysis of a large database (Thiesen & Bach 1990 Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 3203-3209; Pollock & Treisman 1990 Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 6197-6204).

This example presents a convenient and rapid new method which can reveal the optimal binding site(s) of a DNA binding protein by single step selection from small libraries and use this to check the binding site preferences of those zinc fingers selected previously by phage display. For this application, the inventors have used 12 different mini-libraries of the Zif268 binding site, each one with the central triplet having one position defined with a particular base pair and the other two positions randomised. Each library therefore comprises 16 oligonucleotides and offers a number of potential binding sites to the middle finger, provided that the latter can tolerate the defined base pair. Each zinc finger phage is screened against all 12 libraries individually immobilised in wells of a microtitre plate, and binding is detected by an enzyme immunoassay. Thus a pattern of acceptable bases at each position is disclosed, which the inventors term a “binding site signature”. The information contained in a binding site signature encompasses the repertoire of binding sites recognised by a zinc finger.

The binding site signatures obtained, using zinc finger phage selected as described in example 1, reveal that the selection has yielded some highly sequence-specific zinc finger binding motifs which discriminate at all three positions of a triplet. From measurements of equilibrium dissociation constants it is found that these fingers bind tightly to the triplets indicated in their signatures, and discriminate against closely related sites (usually by at least a factor of ten). The binding site signatures allow progress towards a specificity code for the interactions of zinc fingers with DNA.

Materials and Methods

Binding Site Signatures

Flexible flat-bottomed 96-well microtitre plates (Falcon) were coated overnight at 4° C. with streptavidin (0.1 mg/ml in 0.1M NaHCO₃ pH8.6, 0.03% NaN₃). Wells were blocked for one hour with PBS/Zn (PBS, 50 μM Zn (CH3.COO)₂) containing 2% fat-free dried milk (Marvel), washed 3 times with PBS/Zn containing 0.1% Tween, and another 3 times with PBS/Zn. The “bound” strand of each oligonucleotide library was made synthetically and the other strand extended from a 5′-biotinylated universal primer using DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment). Fill-in reactions were added to wells (0.8 pmole DNA library in each) in PBS/Zn for 15 minutes, then washed once with PBS/Zn containing 0.1% Tween, and once again with PBS/Zn. Overnight bacterial cultures each containing a selected zinc finger phage were grown in 2×TY containing 50 mM Zn(CH3.COO)₂ and 15 μg/ml tetracycline at 30° C. Culture supernatants containing phage were diluted tenfold by the addition of PBS/Zn containing 2% fat-free dried milk (Marvel), 1% Tween and 20 μg/ml sonicated salmon sperm DNA. Diluted phage solutions (50 μl) were applied to wells and binding allowed to proceed for one hour at 20° C. Unbound phage were removed by washing D 5 times with PBS/Zn containing 1% Tween, and then 3 times with PBS/Zn. Bound phage were detected as described previously (Griffiths et at al., 1994 EMBO J. In press 13(14):3245-3260), or using HRP-conjugated anti-M13 IgG (Pharmacia), and quantitated using software package SOFT-MAX 2.32 (Molecular Devices Corp).

The results are shown in FIG. 4, which gives the binding site signatures of individual zinc finger phage. The figure represents binding of zinc finger phage to randomised DNA immobilised in the wells of microtitre plates. To test each zinc finger phage against each oligonucleotide library (see above), DNA libraries are applied to columns of wells (down the plate), while rows of wells (across the plate) contain equal volumes of a solution of a zinc finger phage. The identity of each library is given as the middle triplet of the “bound” strand of Zif268 operator, where N represents a mixture of all 4 nucleotides. The zinc finger phage is specified by the sequence of the variable region of the middle finger, numbered relative to the first helical residue (position 1), and the three primary recognition positions are highlighted. Bound phage are detected by an enzyme immunoassay. The approximate strength of binding is indicated by a grey scale proportional to the enzyme activity. From the pattern of binding to DNA libraries, called the “signature” of each clone, one or a small number of binding sites can be read off and these are written on the right of the figure.

Determination of Apparent Equilibrium Dissociation Constants

Overnight bacterial cultures were grown in 2×TY/Zn/Tet at 30° C. Culture supernatants containing phage were diluted twofold by the addition of PBS/Zn containing 4% fat-free dried milk (Marvel), 2% Tween and 40 μg/ml sonicated salmon sperm DNA. Binding reactions, containing appropriate concentrations of specific 5′ -biotinylated DNA and equal volumes of zinc finger phage solution, were allowed to equilibrate for 1 h at 20° C. All DNA was captured on streptavidin-coated paramagnetic beads (500 μg per well) which were subsequently washed 6 times with PBS/Zn containing 1% Tween and then 3 times with PBS/Zn. Bound phage were detected using HRP-conjugated anti-M13 IgG (Pharmacia) and developed as described (Griffiths et al., 1994). Optical densities were quantitated using software package SOFTMAX 2.32 (Molecular Devices Corp).

The results are shown in FIGS 5A-5F, which is a series of graphs of fractional saturation against concentration of DNA (nM). The two outer fingers carry the native sequence, as do the the two cognate outer DNA triplets. The sequence of amino acids occupying helical positions −1 to +9 of the varied finger are shown in each case. The graphs show that the middle finger can discriminate closely related triplets, usually by a factor of ten. The graphs allowed the determination of apparent equilibrium dissociation constants, as below.

Estimations of the K_d are by fitting to the equation K_d=[DNA ].[P ]/[DNA.P], using the software package KALEIDAGRAPH™ Version 2.0 programme (Abelbeck Software). Owing to the sensitivity of the ELISA used to detect protein-DNA complex, the inventors were able to use zinc finger phage concentrations far below those of the DNA, as is required for accurate calculations of the K_d. The technique used here has the advantage that while the concentration of DNA (variable) must be known accurately, that of the zinc fingers (constant) need not be known (Choo & Klug 1993 Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 3341-3346). This circumvents the problem of calculating the number of zinc finger peptides expressed on the tip of each phage, although since only 10-20% of the gene III protein (pIII) carries such peptides one would expect on average less than one copy per phage. Binding is performed in solution to prevent any effects caused by the avidity (Marks et al., 1992) of phage for DNA immobilised on a surface. Moreover, in this case measurements of K_d by ELISA are made possible since equilibrium is reached in solution prior to capture on the solid phase.

Results and Discussion

The Binding Site Signature of the Second Finger of Zif268

The top row of FIG. 4 shows the signature of the second finger of wild type Zif268. From the pattern of strong signals indicating binding to oligonucleotide libraries having GNN, TNN, NGN and NNG as the middle triplet, it emerges that the optimal binding site for this finger is T/G,G,G, in accord with the published consensus sequence (Christy & Nathans 1989 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 8737-8741). This has implications for the interpretation of the X-ray crystal structure of Zif268 solved in complex with consensus operator having, TGG as the middle triplet (Pavletich & Pabo 1991). For instance, His at position +3 of the middle finger was modelled as donating a hydrogen bond to N7 of G, suggesting an equivalent contact to be possible with N7 of A, but from the binding site signature we can see that there is discrimination against A. This implies that the His may prefer to make a hydrogen bond to O6 of G or a bifurcated hydrogen bond to both O6 and N7, or that a steric clash with the amino group of A may prevent a tight interaction with this base. Thus by considering the stereochemistry of double helical DNA, binding site signatures can give insight into the details of zinc finger-DNA interactions.

Amino Acid-base Contacts in Zinc Finger-DNA Complexes Deduced from Binding Site Signatures

The binding site signatures of other zinc fingers reveal that the phage selections performed in example 1 yielded highly sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. Some of these are able to specify a unique sequence for the middle triplet of a variant Zif268 binding site, and are therefore more specific than is Zif268 itself for its consensus site. Moreover, one can identify the fingers which recognise a particular oligonucleotide library, that is to say a specific base at a defined position, by looking down the columns of FIG. 4. By comparing the amino acid sequences of these fingers one can identify any residues which have genuine preferences for particular bases on bound DNA. With a few exceptions, these are as previously predicted on the basis of phage display, and are summarised in Table 2.

Table 2 summarises frequently observed amino acid-base contacts in interactions of selected zinc fingers with DNA. The given contacts comprise a “syllabic” recognition code for appropriate triplets. Cognate amino acids and their positions in the α-helix are entered in a matrix relating each base to each position of a triplet. Auxiliary amino acids from position +2 can enhance or modulate specificity of amino acids at position −1 and these are listed as pairs. Ser or Thr at position +6 permit Asp +2 of the following finger (denoted Asp ++2) to specify both G and T indirectly, and the pairs are listed. The specificity of Ser +3 for T and Thr +3 for C may be interchangeable in rare instances while Val +3 appears to be consistently ambiguous.

TABLE 2
POSITION IN TRIPLET
	5′	MIDDLE	3′
		Arg +6
	G	Ser +6/Asp ++2	His +3	Arg −1/Asp +2
		Thr +6/Asp ++2
	A		Asn +3	Gln −1/Ala +2
		Ser +6/Asp ++2	Aln +3	Asn −1
	T	Thr +6/Asp ++2	Ser +3	Gln −1/Ser +2
		Val +3
		Asp +3
	C		Leu +3	Asp −1
			Thr +3
			Val +3

The binding site signatures also reveal an important feature of the phage display library which is important to the interpretation of the selection results. All the fingers in our panel, regardless of the amino acid present at position +6, are able to recognise G or both G and T at the 5′ end of a triplet. The probable explanation for this is that the 5′ position of the middle triplet is fixed as either G or T by a contact from the invariant Asp at position +2 of finger 3 to the partner of either base on the complementary strand, analogous to those seen in the Zif268 (Pavletich & Pabo 1991 Science 252, 809-817) and tramtrack (Fairall et al., 1993) crystal structures (a contact to NH₂ of C or A respectively in the major groove). Therefore Asp at position +2 of finger 3 is dominant over the amino acid present at position +6 of the middle finger, precluding the possibility of recognition of A or C at the 5′ position. Future libraries must be designed with this interaction omitted or the position varied. Interestingly, given the framework of the conserved regions of the three fingers, one can identify a rule in the second finger which specifics a frequent interaction with both G and T, viz the occurrence of Ser or Thr at position +6, which may donate a hydrogen bond to either base.

Modulation of Base Recognition by Auxiliary Positions

As noted above, position +2 is able to specify the base directly 3′ of the ‘cognate triplet’, and can thus work in conjunction with position +6 of the preceding finger. The binding site signatures, whilst pointing to amino acid-base contacts from the three primary positions, indicate that auxiliary positions can play other parts in base recognition. A clear case in point is Gln at position −1, which is specific for A at the 3′ end of a triplet when position +2 is a small non-polar amino acid such as Ala, though specific for T when polar residues such as Ser are at position +2. The strong correlation between Arg at position −1 and Asp at position +2, the basis of which is understood from the X-ray crystal structures of zinc fingers, is another instance of interplay between these two positions. Thus the amino acid at position +2 is able to modulate or enhance the specificity of the amino acid at other positions.

At position +3, a different type of modulation is seen in the case of Thr and Val which most often prefer C in the middle position of a triplet, but in some zinc fingers are able to recognise both C and T. This ambiguity occurs possibly as a result of different hydrophobic interactions involving the methyl groups of these residues, and here a flexibility in the inclination of the finger rather than an effect from another position per se may be the cause of ambiguous reading.

Quantitative Measurements of Dissociation Constants

The binding site signature of a zinc finger reveals its differential base preferences at a given concentration of DNA. As the concentration of DNA is altered, one can expect the binding site signature of any clone to change, being more distinctive at low [DNA], and becoming less so at higher [DNA]0 as the K_d of less favourable sites is approached and further bases become acceptable at each position of the triplet. Furthermore, because two base positions are randomly occupied in any one library of oligonucleotides, binding site signatures are not formally able to exclude the possibility of context dependence for some interactions. Therefore to supplement binding site signatures, which are essentially comparative, quantitative determinations of the equilibrium dissociation constant of each phage for different DNA binding sites are required. After phage display selection and binding site signatures, these are the third and definitive stage in assessing the specificity of zinc fingers.

Examples of such studies presented in FIGS 5A-5F show reveal that zinc finger phages bind the operators indicated in their binding site signatures with Ks in the range of 10⁻⁸-10⁻⁹ M, and can discriminate against closely related binding sites by factors greater than an order of magnitude. Indeed FIGS. 5A-5F shows such differences in affinity for binding sites which differ in only one out of nine base pairs. Since the zinc fingers in our panel were selected from a library by non-competitive affinity purification, there is the possibility that fingers which are even more discriminatory can be isolated using a competitive selection process.

Measurements of dissociation constants allow different triplets to be ranked in order of preference according to the strength of binding. The examples here indicate that the contacts from either position −1 or +3 can contribute to discrimination. Also, the ambiguity in certain binding site signatures referred to above can be shown to have a basis in the equal affinity of certain figures fingers for closely related triplets. This is demonstrated by the K_ds of the finger containing the amino acid sequence RGDALTSHER (Seq ID No. 100) for the triple triplets TTG and GTG.

A code for zinc ringer-DNA recognition. One would expect that the versatility of the zinc finger motif will have allowed evolution to develop various modes or binding to DNA (and even to RNA), which will be too diverse to fall under the scope of a single code. However, although a code may not apply to all zinc finger-DNA interactions, there is now convincing evidence that a code applies to a substantial subset. This code will fall short of being able to predict unfailingly the DNA binding site preference of any given zinc finger from its amino acid sequence, but may yet be sufficiently comprehensive to allow the design of zinc fingers with specificity for a given DNA sequence.

Using the selection methods of phage display (as described above) and of binding site signatures it is found that in the case of Zif268-like zinc fingers, DNA recognition involves four fixed principal (three primary and one auxiliary) positions on the α-helix, from where a limited and specific set of amino acid-base contacts result in recognition of a variety of DNA triplets. In other words, a code can describe the interactions of zinc fingers with DNA. Towards this code, one can propose amino acid-base contacts for almost all the entries in a matrix relating each base to each position of a triplet (Table 2). Where there is overlap, the results presented here complement those of Desjarlais and Berg who have derived similar rules by altering zinc finger specificity using database-guided mutagenesis (Desjarlais & Berg 1992 Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 7345-7349; Desjarlais & Berg 1993 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 2256-2260).

Combinatorial use of the Coded Contacts

The individual base contacts listed in Table 2, though part of a code, may not always result in sequence specific binding to the expected base triplet when used in any combination. In the first instance one must be aware of the possibility that zinc fingers may not be able to recognise certain combinations of bases in some triplets by use of this code, or even at all. Otherwise, the majority of inconsistencies may be accounted for by considering variations in the inclination of the trident reading head of a zinc finger with respect to the triplet with which it is interacting. It appears that the identity of an amino acid at any one α-helical position is attuned to the identity of the residues at the other two positions to allow three base contacts to occur simultaneously. Therefore, for example, in order that Ala may pick out T in the triplet GTG, Arg must not be used to recognise G from position +6, since this would distance the former too far from the DNA (see for example the finger containing the amino acid sequence RGDALTSHER) (Seq ID No. 100). Secondly, since the pitch of the α-helix is 3.6 amino acids per turn, positions −1, +3 and +6 are not an integral number of turns apart, so that position +3 is nearer to the DNA than are −1 or +6. Hence, for example, short amino acids such as His and Asn, rather than the longer Arg and Gln, are used for the recognition of purines in the middle position of a triplet.

As a consequence of these distance effects one might say that the code is not really “alphabetic” (always identical amino acid:base contact) but rather “syllabic” (use of a small repertoire of rules, but base contacts). An alphabetic code would involve only four rules, but syllabicity adds an additional level of complexity, since systematic combinations of rules comprise the code. Nevertheless, the recognition of each triplet is still best described by a code of syllables, rather than a catalogue of “logograms” (idiosyncratic amino acid:base contact depending on triplet).

Conclusions

The “syllabic” code of interactions with DNA is made possible by the versatile framework of the zinc finger: this allows an adaptability at the interface with DNA by slight changes of orientation, which in turn maintains a stoichiometry of one coplanar amino acid per base-pair in many different complexes. Given this mode of interaction between amino acids and bases it is to be expected that recognition of G and A by Arg and Asn/Gln respectively are important features of the code; but remarkably other interactions can be more discriminatory than was anticipated (Seeman et al., 1976). Conversely, it is clear that degeneracy can be programmed in the zinc fingers in varying degrees allowing for intricate interactions with different regulatory DNA sequences (Harrison & Travers, 1990; Christy & Nathans, 1989). One can see how this principle makes possible the regulation of differential gene expression by a limited set of transcription factors.

As already noted above, the versatility of the finger motif will likely allow other modes of binding to DNA. Similarly, one must take into account the malleability of nucleic acids such as is observed in Fairall et al., where a deformation of the double helix at a flexible base step allows a direct contact from Ser at position +2 of finger 1 to a T at the 3′ position of the cognate triplet. Even in our selections there are instances of fingers whose binding mode is obscure, and may require structural analyses for clarification. Thus, water may be seen to play an important role, for example where short side chains such as Asp, Asn or Ser interact with bases from position −1 (Qian et al., 1993 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 1189-1190; Shakked et al., 1994 Nature (London) 368, 469-478).

Eventually, it might be possible to develop a number of codes describing zinc finger binding to DNA, which could predict the binding site preferences of some zinc fingers from their amino acid sequence. The functional amino acids selected at positions −1, +3 and to an extent +6 in this study, are very frequently observed at the same positions in naturally occurring fingers (e.g. see FIG. 4. of Desjarlais and Berg 1992 Proteins 12, 101-104) supporting the existence of coded contacts from these three positions. However, the lack of definitive predictive methods is not a serious practical limitation as current laboratory techniques (here and in Thiesen & Bach 1990 and Pollock & Treisman 1990) will allow the identification of binding sites for a given DNA-binding protein. Rather, one can apply phage selection and a knowledge of the recognition rules to the converse problem, namely the design of proteins to bind predetermined DNA sites

Prospects for the Design of DNA-binding Proteins

The ability to manipulate the sequence specificity of zinc fingers implies that we are on the eve of designing DNA-binding proteins with desired specificity for applications in medicine and research (Desjarlais & Berg, 1993; Rebar & Pabo, 1994). This is possible because, by contrast to all other DNA-binding motifs, we can avail ourselves of the modular nature of the zinc finger, since DNA sites can be recognised by appropriate combinations of independently acting, fingers linked in tandem.

The coded interactions of zinc fingers with DNA can be used to model the specificity of individual zinc fingers de novo, or more likely in conjunction with phage display selection of suitable candidates. In this way, according to requirements, one could modulate the affinity for a given binding site, or even engineer an appropriate degree of indiscrimination at particular base positions. Moreover, the additive effect of multiply repeated domains offers the opportunity to bind specifically and tightly to extended, and hence very rare, genomic loci. Thus zinc finger proteins might well be a good alternative to the use of antisense nucleic acids in suppressing or modifying the action of a given gene, whether normal or mutant. To this end, extra functions could be introduced to these DNA binding domains by appending suitable natural or synthetic effectors.

EXAMPLE 3

From the evidence presented in the preceding examples, the inventors propose that specific DNA-binding proteins comprising zinc fingers can be “made to measure”. To demonstrate their potential the inventors have created a three finger polypeptide able to bind site-specifically to a unique 9 bp region of a BCR-ABL fusion oncogene and to discriminate it from the parent genomic sequences (Kurzrock et al., 1988 N. Engl. J. Med. 319, 990 -998). Using transformed cells in culture as a model, it is shown that binding to the target oncogene in chromosomal DNA is possible, resulting in blockage of transcription. Consequently, murine cells made growth factor-independent by the action of the oncogene (Daley et al., 1988 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 9312-9316) are found to revert to factor dependence on transient transfection with a vector expressing the designed zinc finger polypeptide.

DNA-binding proteins designed to recognise specific DNA sequences could be incorporated in chimeric transcription factors, recombinases, nucleases etc. for a wide range of applications. The inventors have shown that zinc finger mini-domains can discriminate between closely related DNA triplets, and have proposed that they can be linked together to form domains for the specific recognition of longer DNA sequences. One interesting possibility for the use of such protein domains is to target selectively genetic differences in pathogens or transformed cells. Here one such application is described.

There exist a set of human leukaemias in which a reciprocal chromosomal translocation t(9;22) (q34; q11) result in a truncated chromosome 22, the Philadelphia chromosome (Pbl)5, encoding at the breakpoint a fusion of sequences from the c-ABL protooncogene (Bartram et al., 1983 Nature 306, 277-280) and the BCR gene (Groffen et al., 1984 Cell 36, 93-99). In chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML), the breakpoints usually occur in the first intron of the c-ABL gene and in the breakpoint cluster region of the BCR gene (Shtivelman et al., 1985 Nature 315, 550-554), and give rise to a p210^BCR-ABL gene product (Konopka et al., 1984 Cell 37, 1035-1042). Alternatively, in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), the breakpoints usually occur in the first introns of both BCR and c-ABL (Hermans er al., 1987 Cell 51, 33-40), and result in a p190^BCR-ABL gene product (FIG. 6) (Kurzrock et al., 1987 Nature 325, 631-635).

FIG. 6 shows the nucleotide sequences (Seq ID No.s 9-11) of the fusion point between BCR and ABL sequences in p190 cDNA, and of the corresponding exon boundaries in the BCR and c-ABL genes. Exon sequences are written in capital letters while introns are given in lowercase. Line 1 shows p190^BCR-ABL cDNA; line 2 the BCR genomic sequence at junction of exon 1 and intron 1; and line 3 the ABL genomic sequence at junction of intron 1 and exon 2 (Hermans et al 1987). The 9 bp sequence in the p190^BCR-ABL cDNA used as a target is underlined, as are the homologous sequences in genomic BCR and c-ABL.

Facsimiles of these rearranged genes act as dominant transforming oncogenes in cell culture (Daley et al., 1988) and transgenic mice (Heisterkamp et al., 1990 Nature 344, 251-253). Like their genomic counterparts, the cDNAs bear a unique nucleotide sequence at the fusion point of the BCR and c-ABL genes, which can be recognised at the DNA level by a site-specific DNA-binding protein. The present inventors have designed such a protein to recognise the unique fusion site in the p190^BCR-ABL c-DNA. This fusion is obviously distinct from the breakpoints in the spontaneous genomic translocations, which are thought to be variable among patients. Although the design of such peptides has implications for cancer research, the primary aim here is to prove the principle of protein design, and to assess the feasibility of in vivo binding to chromosomal DNA in available model systems.

A nine base-pair target sequence (GCA, GAA, GCC) for a three zinc finger peptide was chosen which spanned the fusion point of the p190^BCR-ABL cDNA (Hermans et al., 1987). The three triplets forming this binding site were each used to screen a zinc finger phage library over three rounds as described above in example 1. The selected fingers were then analysed by binding site signatures to reveal their preferred triplet, and mutations to improve specificity were made to the finger selected for binding to GCA. A phage display mini-library of putative BCR-ABL-binding three-finger proteins was cloned in fd phage, comprising six possible combinations of the six selected or designed fingers (1A, 1B; 2A; 3A, 3B and 3C) linked in the appropriate order. These fingers are illustrated in FIG 7 (Seq ID No.s 12-17). In FIG. 7 regions of secondary structure are underlined below the list, while residue positions are given above, relative to the first position of the α-helix (position 1). Zinc finger phages were selected from a library of 2.6×10⁶ variants, using three DNA binding sites each containing one of the triplets GCC, GAA or GCA. Binding site signatures (example 2) indicate that fingers 1A and 1B specify the triplet GCC, finger 2A specifics GAA, while the fingers selected using the triplet GCA all prefer binding to GCT. Amongst the latter is finger 3A, the specificity of which we believed, on the basis of recognition rides, could be changed by a point mutation. Finger 3B, based on the selected finger 3A, but in which Gln at helical position +2 was altered to Ala should be specific for GCA. Finger 3C is an alternative version of finger 3A, in which the recognition of C is mediated by Asp +3 rather than by Thr +3.

The mini library was screened once with an oligonucleotide containing the 9 base-pair BCR-ABL target sequence to select for tight binding clones over weak binders and background vector phage. Because the library was small, the inventors did not include competitor DNA sequences for homologous regions of the genomic BCR and c-ABL genes but instead checked the selected clones for their ability to discriminate. It was found that although all the selected clones were able to bind the BCR-ABL target sequence and to discriminate between this and the genomic-BCR sequence, only a subset could discriminate against the c-ABL sequence which, at the junction between intron 1 and exon 2, has an 8/9 base-pair homology to the BCR-ABL target sequence (Hermans et al., 1987). Sequencing of the discriminating clones revealed two types of selected peptide, one with the composition 1A-2A-3B and the other with 1B-2A-3B. Thus both peptides carried the third finger (3B) which was specifically designed against the triplet GCA but peptide 1A-2A-3B was able to bind to the BCR-ABL target sequence with higher affinity than was peptide 1B-2A-3B.

The peptide 1A-2A-3B, henceforth referred to as the anti-BCR-ABL peptide, was used in further experiments. The anti-BCR-ABL peptide has an apparent equilibrium dissociation constant (K_d) of 6.2±0.4×10⁻⁷M for the p190^BCR-ABL cDNA sequence in vitro, and discriminates against the similar sequences found in genomic BCR and C-ABL DNA, by factors greater than an order of magnitude (FIG. 8). Referring to FIG. 8, (which illustrates discrimination in the binding, of the anti-BCR-ABL peptide to its p190^BCR-ABL target site and to like regions of genomic BCR and c-ABL), the graph shows binding (measured as an A_450-650) at various [DNA]. Binding reactions and complex detection by enzyme immunoassay were performed as described previously, and a full curve analysis was used in calculations of the K_d(Choo & Klug 1993). The DNA used were oligonucleotides spanning 9 bp either side of the fusion point in the cDNA or the exon boundaries. The anti-BCR-ABL peptide binds to its intended target site with a K_d=6.2±0.4×10⁻⁷M, and is able to discriminate against genomic BCR and c-ABL sequences, though the latter differs by only one base pair in the bound 9 bp region. The measured dissociation constant is higher than that of three-finger peptides from naturally occurring proteins such as Spl (Kadonga et al., 1987 Cell 51, 1079-1090) or Zif268 (Christy et al., 1988), which have K_ds in the range of 10⁻⁹M, but rather is comparable to that of the two fingers from the tramtrack (ttk) protein (Fairall et al., 1992). However, the affinity of the anti-BCR-ABL peptide could be refined, if desired, by site-directed mutations or by “affinity maturation” of a phage display library (Hawkins et al., 1992 J. Mol. Biol. 226, 889-896).

Having, established DNA discrimination in vitro, the inventors wished to test whether the anti-BCR-ABL peptide was capable of site-specific DNA-binding, in vivo. The peptide was fused to the VP16 activation domain from herpes simplex virus (Fields 1993 Methods 5, 116-124) and used in transient transfection assays (FIG. 9) to drive production of a CAT (chloramphenicol acetyl transferase) reporter gene from a binding site upstream of the TATA box (Gorman et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 2, 1044-1051). In detail, the experiment was performed thus: reporter plasmids pMCAT6BA, pMCAT6A, and pMCAT6B, were constructed by inserting 6 copies of the p190^BCR-ABL target site (CGCAGAAGCC) (Seq ID No. 121), the c-ABL second exon-intron junction sequence (TCCAGAAGCC) (Seq ID No. 122), or the BCR first exon-intron junction sequence (CGCAGGTGAG) (Seq ID No. 123) respectively, into pMCAT3 (Luscher et al., 1989 Genes Dev. 1507-1517). The anti-BCR-ABL/VP16 expression vector was generated by inserting the in-frame fusion between the activation domain of herpes simplex virus VP16 (Fields 1993) and the Zn finger peptide in the pEF-BOS vector (Mizushima & Shigezaku 1990 Nucl. Acids Res. 18, 5322). C3H10T1/2 cells were transiently co-transfected with 10 mg of reporter plasmid and 10 mg of expression vector. RSVL (de Wet et al., 1987 Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 725-737), which contains the Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat linked to luciferase, was used as an internal control to normalise for differences in transfection efficiency. Cells were transfected by the calcium phosphate precipitation method and CAT assays performed as described (Sanchez-Garcia et al., 1993 EMBO J. 12, 4243-4250). Plasmid pGSEC, which has five consensus 17-mer GAL4-binding sites upstream from the minimal promoter of the adenovirus Elb TATA box, and pMlVP16 vector, which encodes an in-frame fusion between the DNA-binding domain of GAL4 and the activation domain of herpes simplex virus VP16, were used as a positive control (Sadowski et al., 1992 Gene 118, 137-141).

C3H10T1/2 cells were transiently cotransfected with a CAT reporter plasmid and an anti-BCR-ABL/VP 16 expression vector (pZNIA).

A specific (thirty-fold) increase in CAT activity was observed in cells cotransfected with reporter plasmid bearing copies of the p190^BCR-ABL cDNA target site, compared to a barely detectable increase in cells cotransfected with reporter plasmid bearing copies of either the BCR or c-ABL semihomologous sequences, indicating in vivo binding.

The selective stimulation of transcription indicates convincingly that highly site-specific DNA-binding can occur in vivo. However, while transient transfections assay binding to plasmid DNA, the true target site for this and most other DNA-binding proteins is in genomic DNA. This might well present significant problems, not least since this DNA is physically separated from the cytosol by the nuclear membrane, but also since it may be packaged within chromatin.

To study whether genomic targeting is possible, a construct was made in which the anti-BCR-ABL peptide was flanked at the N-terminus with the nuclear localisation signal from the large T antigen of SV40 virus (Kalderon et al., 1984 Cell 499-509), and at the C-terminus with an 11 amino acid c-myc epitope tag recognisable by the 9E10 antibody (Evan et al., 1985 Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 3610-3616). This construct was used to transiently transfect the IL-3-dependent murine cell line Ba/F3 (Palacios & Steinmetz 1985 Cell 41, 727-734), or alternatively Ba/F3+p190 and Ba/F3+p210 cell lines previously made IL-3-independent by integrated plasmid constructs expressing either p190^BCR-ABL or p210^BCR-ABL, respectively. Staining of the cells with the 9E10 antibody followed by a secondary fluorescent conjugate showed efficient nuclear localisation in those cells transfected with the anti-BCR-ABL peptide.

The experimental details were as follows: the anti-BCR-ABL expression vector was generated in the pEF-BOS vector (Mizushima & Shigezaku 1990), including an 11 amino acid c-myc epitope tag (EQKLISEEDLN) SEQ ID NO: 124 at the carboxy-terminal end, recognizable by the 9E10 antibody (Evan et al., 1985) and the nuclear localization signal PKKKRKV SEQ ID NO: 125 of the large T antigen of SV40 virus (Kalderon et al., 1984) at the amino-terminal end. Three glycine residues were introduced downstream of the nuclear localization signal as a spacer, to ensure exposure of the nuclear leader from the folded molecule. Ba/F3 cells were transfected with 25 mg of the anti-BCR-ABL expression construct tagged with the 9E10 c-myc epitope as described (Sanchez-Garcia & Rabbitts 1994 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. in press) and protein production analyzed 48 h later by immunofluorescence-labelling as follows. Cells were fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde for 15 min, washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and permeabilized in methanol for 2 min. After blocking in 10% fetal calf serum in PBS for 30 min, the mouse 9E10 antibody was added. After a 30 min incubation at room temperature a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (SIGMA) was added and incubated for a further 30 min. Fluorescent cells were visualized using a confocal scanning microscope (magnification, 200×).

Immunofluorescence of Ba/F3+p190 and Ba/F3+p210 cells transiently transfected with the anti-bcr-abl expression vector and stained with the 9E10 antibody was done. Expression and nuclear localisation of the anti-BCR-ABL peptide was observed. In addition, transfected Ba/F3+p190 cells show chromatin condensation and nuclear fragmentation into small apoptotic bodies, but not either untransfected Ba/F3+p190 cells or transfected Ba/F3+p210 cells.

The efficiency of transient transfection, measured as the proportion of immunofluorescent cells in the population, was 15-20%. When IL-3 is withdrawn from tissue culture, a corresponding proportion of Ba/F3+p190 cells are found to have reverted to factor dependence and die, while Ba/F3+p210 cells are unaffected. The experimental details were as follows: cell lines Ba/F3, Ba/F3+p190 and Ba/F3+p210 were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. In the case of Ba/F3 cell line 10% WEHI-3B-conditioned medium was included as a source of IL-3. After the transfection with the anti-BCR-ABL expression vector, cells (5×10⁵/ml) were washed twice in serum-free medium and cultured in DMEM medium with 10% fetal bovine serum without WEHI-3 B-conditioned medium. Percentage viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion. Data are expressed as means of triplicate cultures. The results are shown in graphical form in FIG. 9.

Immunofluorescence microscopy of transfected Ba/F3+p190 cells in the absence of IL-3 shows chromatin condensation and nuclear fragmentation into small apoptotic bodies, while the nuclei of Ba/F3+p210 cells remain intact. Northern blots of total cytoplasmic RNA from Ba/F3+p190 cells transiently transfected with the anti-BCR-ABL peptide revealed reduced levels of p190^BCR-ABL mRNA relative to untransfected cells. By contrast, similarly transfected Ba/F3+p210 cells showed no decrease in the levels of p210^BCR-ABL mRNA (FIG. 12) . The blots were performed as follows: 10 mg of total cytoplasmic RNA, from the cells indicated, was glyoxylated and fractionated in 1.4% agarose gels in 10 mM NaPO₄ buffer, pH 7.0. After electrophoresis the gel was blotted onto HYBOND-N (Amersham), UV-cross linked and hybridized to an ³²P-labelled c-ABL probe. Autoradiography was for 14 h at −70° C. Loading was monitored by reprobing the filters with a mouse b-acting β-actin cDNA.

Northern filter hybridisation analysis of Ba/F3+p190 and Ba/F3+p210 cell lines transfected with the anti-BCR-ABL expression vector was done. When transfected with the anti-BCR-ABL expression vector, a specific downregulation of p190^BCR-ABL mRNA was seen in Ba/F3+p190 cells, while expression of p210^BCR-ABL was unaffected in Ba/F3+p210 cells.

In summary, the inventors have demonstrated that a DNA-binding protein designed to recognise a specific DNA sequence in vitro, is active in vivo where, directed to the nucleus by an appended localisation signal, it can bind its target sequence in chromosomal DNA. This is found on otherwise actively transcribing DNA, so presumably binding of the peptide blocks the path of the polymerase, causing stalling or abortion. The use of a specific polypeptide in this case to target intragenic sequences is reminiscent of anti-sense oligonucleotide- or ribozyme- based approaches to inhibiting the expression of selected genes (Stein & Cheng 1993 Science 261, 1004-1012). Like antisense oligonucleotides, zinc finger DNA-binding proteins can be tailored against genes altered by chromosomal translocations, or point mutations, as well as to regulatory sequences within genes. Also, like oligonucleotides which can be designed to repress transcription by triple helix formation in homopurine-homopyrimidine promoters (Cooney et al., 1988 Science 245, 725-730) DNA-binding proteins can bind to various unique regions outside genes, but in contrast they can direct gene expression by both up- or down-regulating, the initiation of transcription when fused to activation (Seipel er al., 1992 EMBO J. 11, 4961-4968) or repression domains (Herschbach er al., 1994 Nature 370, 309-311). In any case, by acting directly on any DNA, and by allowing fusion to a variety of protein effectors, tailored site-specific DNA-binding proteins have the potential to control gene expression, and indeed to manipulate the genetic material itself, in medicine and research.

EXAMPLE 4

The phage display zinc finger library described in the preceding examples could be considered sub-optimal in a number of ways:

i) the library was much smaller than the theoretical maximum size;

ii) the flanking fingers both recognised GCG triplets (in certain cases creating nearly symmetrical binding sites for the three zinc fingers, which enables the peptide to bind to the ‘bottom’ strand of DNA, thus evading the register of interactions we wished to set);

iii) Asp+2 of finger three (“Asp++2”) was dominant over the interactions of finger two (position+6) with the 5′ base of the middle triplet;

iv) not all amino acids were represented in the randomised positions.

In order to overcome these problems a new three-finger library was created in which:

a) the middle finger is fully randomised in only four positions (−1, +2, +3 and +6) so that the library size is smaller and all codons are represented. The library was cloned in the pCANTAB5E phagemid vector from Pharmacia, which allows higher transformation frequencies than the phage.

b) the first and third fingers recognise the triplets GAC and GCA, respectively, making for a highly asymmetric binding site. Recognition of the 3′ A in the latter triplet by finger three is mediated by Gln-1/Ala+2, the significance of which is that the short Ala+2 should not make contacts to the DNA (in particular with the 5′ base of the middle triplet), thus alleviating the problem noted at (iii) above.

EXAMPLE 5

The human ras gene is susceptible to a number of different mutations, which can convert it into an oncogene. A ras oncogene is found in a large number of human cancers. One particular mutation is known as the G12V mutation (i.e. the polypeptide encoded by the mutant gene contains a substitution from glycine to valine). Because ras oncogenes are so common in human cancers, they are extremely significant targets for potential therapeutic methods.

A three finger protein has been designed which can recognise the G12V mutant of ras. The protein was produced using rational design based on the known specificity rules. In outline, a zinc finger framework (from one of the fingers selected to bind GCC) was modified by point mutations in position +3 to yield fingers recognising two additional different triplets. The finger recognising GCC and the two derivatives were cloned in pCANTAB5E and expressed on the surface of phage.

Originally, the G12V-binding peptide “r-BP” was to be selected from a small library of related proteins. The reason a library was to be used is that while it was clear to us what 8/9 of the amino acid:base contacts should be, it was not clear whether the middle C of the GCC triplet should be recognised by +3 Asp, or Glu, or Ser, or Thr (see Table 2 above). Thus a three-finger peptide gene was assembled from 8 overlapping synthetic oligonucleotides which were annealed and ligated according to standard procedures and the −300 bp product purified from a 2% agarose gel. The gene for finger 1 contained a partial codon randomisation at position +3 which allowed for inclusion of each of the above amino acids (D, E, S & T) and also certain other residues which were in fact not predicted to be desirable (e.g. Asn). The synthetic oligonucleotides were designed to have SfiI and NotI overhangs when annealed. The −300 bp fragment was ligated into SfiI/NotI -cut FdSN vector and the ligation mixture was electroporated into DH5α cells. Phage were produced from these as previously described and a selection step carried out using the G12V sequence (also as described) to eliminate phage without insert and those phage of the library which bound poorly.

Following selection, a number of separate clones were isolated and phage produced from these were screened by ELISA for binding to the G12V ras sequence and discrimination against the wild-type ras sequence. A number of clones were able to do this, and sequencing of phage DNA later revealed that these fell into two categories, one of which had the amino acid Asn at the +3 randomised position, and another which had two other undesirable mutations.

The appearance of Asn at position +3 is unexpected and most probably due to the fact that proteins with a cytosine-specific residue at position +3 bind to some E. coli DNA sequence so tightly that they are lethal. Thus phage display selection is not always guaranteed to produce the tightest-binding clone, since passage through bacteria is essential to the technique, and the selected proteins may be those which do not bind to the genome of this host if such binding is deleterious.

K_d measurements show that the clone with Asn+3 nevertheless binds the mutant G12V sequence with a K_d in the nM range and discriminates against the wild-type ras sequence. However it was predicted that Asn+3 should specify an adenine residue at the middle position, whereas the polypeptide we wished to make should specify a cytosine for oiptimal binding.

Thus we assembled a three-finger peptide with a Ser at position +3 of Finger 1 (as shown in FIG. 12), again for using synthetic oligos. This time the gene was ligated to pCANTAB5E phagemid. Transformants were isolated in the E. coli ABLE-C strain (from Stratagene) and grown at 30° C., which strain under these conditions reduces the copy number of plasmids so as to make their toxic products less abundant in the cells.

The amino acid sequence (Seq ID No. 18) of the fingers is shown in FIG. 12. The numbers refer to the α-helical amino acid residues. The fingers (F1, F2 & F3) bind to the G12V mutant nucleotide sequence:

5′ GAC GGC GCC 3′
F3  F2  F1

The bold A shows the single point mutation by which the G12V sequence differs from the wild type sequence.

Assay of the protein in eukaryotes (e.g. to drive CAT reporter production) requires the use of a weak promoter. When expression of the anti-RAS (G12V) protein is strong, the peptide presumably hinds to the wild-type ras allele (which is required) leading to cell death. For this reason, a regulatable promoter (e.g. for tetracycline) will be used to deliver the protein in therapeutic applications, so that protein exceeds the Kd for the G12V point mutated gene but not the Kd for the wild-type allele. Since the G12V mutation is a naturally occurring genomic mutation (not only a cDNA mutation as was the p190 bcr-abl) human cell lines and other animal models can be used in research.

In addition to repressing the expression of the gene, the protein can be used to diagnose the precise point mutation present in the genomic DNA, or more likely in PCR amplified genomic DNA, without sequencing. It should therefore be possible, without further inventive activity, to design diagnostic kits for detecting (e.g. point) mutations on DNA. ELISA-based methods should prove particularly suitable.

It is hoped to fuse the zinc finger binding polypeptide to an scFv fragment which binds to the human transferrin receptor, which should enhance delivery to and uptake by human cells. The transferrin receptor is thought particularly useful but, in theory, any receptor molecule (preferably of high affinity) expressed on the surface of a human target cell could act as a suitable ligand, either for a specific immunoglobulin or fragment, or for the receptor's natural ligand fused or coupled with the zinc finger polypeptide.

Claims

1. A library of dna sequences, each sequence reading a zinc finger polypeptide for display, the zinc finger polypeptide comprising at least one zinc finger having partially randomised allocation of amino acids, the partially randomised zinc finger having a random allocation of amino acids at positions −1, +2, +3 and +6 and at least one of positions +1, +5 or +8, position +1 being the first amino acid in the α-helix of the zinc finger.

2. A library according to claim 1, wherein the partially randomised zinc finger has random allocation of amino acids at each of positions +1, +5 and +8.

3. A library according to claim 1, wherein the encoded partially randomised zinc finger comprises the zinc finger of the Zif 268 polypeptide.

4. A library according to claim 1 as a fusion with a dna sequence encoding the minor coat protein of bacteriophage fd.

5. A method of designing a zinc finger polypeptide for binding to a particular target dna sequence, comprising the steps of:

comparing the binding to one or more dna triplets of each of a plurality of zinc finger polypeptides having a partially randomized zinc finger, the zinc finger polypeptides being encoded by a library in accordance with claim 1; and

selecting those nucleic acid sequences encoding randomised zinc fingers which bind to the target dna sequence.

6. A method of designing a zinc finger polypeptide for binding to a particular target dna sequence, comprising the steps of:

screening against at least a portion of the target dna sequence, a plurality of zinc finger polypeptides having a partially randomised vine finger, the portion of the target dna sequence being sufficient to allow binding of some of the zinc finger polypeptides, the plurality of zinc finger polypeptides being encoded by a library in accordance with claim 1;

comparing the binding to one or more dna triplets of each of said plurality of zinc finger polypeptides having a partially randomised zinc finger positioned between two or more zinc fingers having defined amino acid sequence; and selecting those nucleic acid sequences encoding randomised zinc fingers which bind to the target dna sequence.

7. A method of designing a zinc finger polypeptide for binding to a particular target dna sequence, the method comprising the steps of:

screening against at least a portion of the target dna sequence, zinc finger polypeptides having a partially randomised zinc finger, the portion of the target dna sequence being sufficient to allow binding of some of the zinc finger polypeptides, the zinc finger polypeptides being encoded by a library in accordance with claim 1;

comparing the binding to one or more dna triplets of each of said zinc finger polypeptides having a partially randomised zinc finger;

selecting certain of the screened randomised zinc fingers for analysis of binding characteristics; and combining those sequences encoding desired zinc fingers to form a sequence encoding a single zinc finger polypeptide.

8. A method for producing a zinc finger polypeptide for binding to a particular target dna sequence, comprising the steps of:

screening against at least a portion of the target dna sequence, zinc finger polypeptides having a partially randomised zinc finger, the portion of the target dna sequence being sufficient to allow binding of some of the zinc finger polypeptides, the zinc finger polypeptides being coded by a library in accordance with claim 1;

selecting those nucleic acid sequences encoding randomised zinc fingers which bind to the target dna sequence; and expressing the selected nucleic acid sequences to produce zinc finger polypeptides which bind to the target dna sequence.

9. A library according to claim 1, wherein the zinc finger polypeptide is displayed on a viral particle.

10. A library according to claim 1, wherein the partially randomised zinc finger is positioned between two or more zinc fingers.

11. A method of designing a zinc finger polypeptide for binding to a particular target dna sequence, comprising the steps of:

screening against at least a portion of the target dna sequence, zinc finger polypeptides having a partially randomised zinc finger, the portion of the target dna sequence being sufficient to allow binding of some of the zinc finger polypeptides, the zinc finger polypeptides being encoded by a library in accordance with claim 1; and

selecting those nucleic acid sequences encoding randomised zinc fingers which bind to the target dna sequence.

12. A method according to claim 11, wherein two or more rounds of screening are performed.

13. A method of designing a zinc finger polypeptide for binding to a particular target dna sequence, wherein sequences encoding individual zinc fingers selected by the method of claim 11 are randomly combined in the appropriate order to encode zinc finger polypeptides, the zinc finger polypeptides being screened against the target sequence, that combination of zinc finger sequences encoding a zinc finger polypeptide which binds to the target dna sequence.

14. A method of modifying a nucleic acid sequence of interest present in a sample mixture by binding thereto a zinc finger polypeptide, wherein the zinc finger polypeptide is designed in accordance with claim 11, comprising contacting the sample mixture with a zinc finger polypeptide having affinity for at least a portion of the sequence of interest, so as to allow the zinc finger polypeptide to bind specifically to the sequence of interest.

15. A method according to claim 14, further comprising the step of separating the zinc finger polypeptide and the sequence of interest specifically bound thereto, from the rest of the sample.

16. A method according to claim 14, wherein the zinc finger polypeptide is bound to a solid phase support.

17. A method according to claim 14, wherein the presence of the zinc finger polypeptide bound to the sequence of interest is detected by the addition of one or more detection reagents.

18. A method according to claim 14, wherein the dna sequence of interest is present in an acrylamide or agarose gel matrix, or is present on the surface of a membrane.

19. A dna library according to claim 1, consisting of 64 sequences, each sequence comprising a different one of the 64 possible permutations of a dna triplet, the library being arranged in twelve sublibraries, wherein for any one sub-library one base in the triplet is defined and the other two bases are randomised.

20. A library according to claim 19 wherein the sequences are biotinylated.

21. A library according to claim 19, wherein the sequences are associated with separation means.

22. A library according to claim 21, wherein the separation means is selected from the group consisting of microtitre plate, magnetic bead, non-magnetic bead, sedimentation particle, and affinity chromatography column.

23. A kit for making a zinc finger polypeptide for binding to a nucleic acid sequence of interest, comprising: a library of dna sequences according to claim 1 encoding zinc finger polypeptides into a vector; a vector molecule that accepts one or more sequences from the library; and instructions for use.

24. A kit according to claim 23, wherein the vector directs the expression of the cloned sequences as a single zinc finger polypeptide.

25. A kit according to claim 23, wherein the vector directs the expression of the cloned sequences as a single zinc finger polypeptide displayed on the surface of a viral particle.

26. A kit for making a zinc finger polypeptide for binding to a nucleic acid sequence of interest, comprising: a library of dna sequences in accordance with claim 1; and instructions for use.

27. A kit according to claim 26, further comprising a dna library consisting of 64 sequences, each sequence comprising a different one of the 64 possible permutations of a dna triplet, the library being arranged in twelve sub-libraries, wherein for any one sub-library one base in the triplet is defined and the other two bases are randomized.

28. A kit according to claim 27 further comprising appropriate buffer solutions and/or reagents for detection of bound zinc fingers.

29. A kit according in claim 28 further comprising a vector suitable for accepting one or more sequences selected from the library of dna sequences encoding zinc fingers.

30. A library of dna sequences, each sequence encoding a zinc finger polypeptide for display, the zinc finger polypeptide comprising at least one zinc finger having partially randomised allocation of amino acids, the partially randomised zinc finger having a random allocation of amino acids at positions −1, +1, +2, +3 and +6, position +1 being the first amino acid in the α-helix of the zinc finger.

31. A library according to claim 30, wherein the partially randomised zinc finger further has a random allocation of amino acids at position +5.

32. A library according to claim 31, wherein the zinc finger polypeptide is displayed on a viral particle.

33. A library according to claim 31, wherein the partially randomised zinc finger is positioned between two or more zinc fingers.

34. A library according to claim 30, wherein the partially randomised zinc finger further has a random allocation of amino acids at position +8.

35. A library according to claim 34, wherein the zinc finger polypeptide is displayed on a viral particle.

36. A library according to claim 34, wherein the partially randomised zinc finger is positioned between two or more zinc fingers.

37. A library of dna sequences each sequence encoding a zinc finger polypeptide for display, the zinc finger polypeptide comprising at least one zinc finger having partially randomised allocation of amino acids, the partially randomised zinc finger having a random allocation of amino acids at positions −1, +2, +3, +5 and +6, position +1 being the first amino acid in the α-helix of the zinc finger.

38. A library according to claim 37, wherein the partially randomised zinc finger further has a random allocation of amino acids at position +8.

39. A library according to claim 38, wherein the zinc finger polypeptide is displayed on a viral particle.

40. A library according to claims 38, wherein the partially randomised zinc finger is positioned between two or more zinc fingers.

41. A library of dna sequences, each sequence encoding a zinc finger polypeptide for display, the zinc finger polypeptide comprising at least one zinc finger having partially randomised allocation of amino acids, the partially randomised zinc finger having a random allocation of amino acids at positions −1, +2, +3, +6 and +8, position +1 being the first amino acid in the α-helix of the zinc finger.

42. An isolated polypeptide comprising a non-naturally occurring zinc finger protein and a heterologous functional domain,

(a) wherein the non-naturally occurring zinc finger protein:

(i) has been designed to bind to a particular chromosomal target dna sequence, and

(ii) comprises a non-naturally occurring zinc finger comprising an antiparallel beta sheet packed against an alpha helix; and

(b) wherein the heterologous functional domain is selected from the group consisting of an activation domain, a repression domain, a catalytic domain from a restriction enzyme and a nuclear localization signal.

43. The polypeptide of claim 42, wherein the functional domain comprises an activation domain.

44. The polypeptide of claim 43, wherein the activation domain comprises VP-16.

45. The polypeptide of claim 42, wherein the functional domain comprises a nuclear localization signal.

46. The polypeptide of claim 45, wherein the nuclear localization signal is from the large T antigen of SV40.

47. The polypeptide of claim 42, wherein the functional domain comprises a repression domain.

48. The polypeptide of claim 42, wherein the functional domain comprises a catalytic domain from a restriction enzyme.

49. The polypeptide of claim 42, wherein the non-naturally occurring zinc finger protein can discriminate between dna sequences that differ by one nucleotide.