A method of real time field wide reservoir management comprising the steps of processing collected field wide reservoir data in accordance with one or more predetermined algorithms to obtain a resultant desired field wide production/injection forecast, generating a signal to one or more individual well control devices instructing the device to increase or decrease flow through the well control device, transmitting the signal to the individual well control device, opening or closing the well control device in response to the signal to increase or decrease the production for one or more selected wells on a real time basis. The system for field wide reservoir management comprising a CPU for processing collected field wide reservoir data, generating a resultant desired field wide production/injection forecast and calculating a target production rate for one or more wells and one or more down hole production/injection control devices.
|
0. 125. A method for developing a reservoir, the method comprising:
performing the following operations, at least in part, at a location remote from a site of a well being drilled that penetrates the reservoir, from a site of a well being completed, or from a site of a well that is producing from the reservoir while drilling:
receiving data in real time, said data related to a characteristic of the reservoir, wherein the characteristic comprises at least one of temperature, annulus pressure, formation pressure, fluid flow rate, fluid flow type, formation resistivity, permeability, seismics, cross-well acoustic seismometry, porosity, perforation depth, surface data Logging (SDL) data, well log data, core data, water saturation data, oil saturation data, clay content data, pressure transient data, skin data, estimated reservoir boundary, hydraulic pressure, hydraulic power, or fluid characteristics;
analyzing, with a computer, the data related to the characteristic of the reservoir.
0. 99. A system for developing a reservoir, the system comprising:
a downhole sensor to collect data related to a characteristic of the reservoir, in real time wherein the characteristic comprises at least one of temperature, annulus pressure, formation pressure, fluid flow rate, fluid flow type, formation resistivity, permeability, seismics, cross-well acoustic seismometry, porosity, perforation depth, surface data Logging (SDL) data, well log data, core data, water saturation data, oil saturation data, clay content data, pressure transient data, skin data, estimated reservoir boundary, hydraulic pressure, hydraulic power, or fluid characteristics;
a processor at the surface of the Earth to process data related to the characteristic of the reservoir from downhole;
a data base accessible by the processor to store the characteristic of the reservoir; and
a control device that is to receive a control signal from the processor to control an operation related to the reservoir, while drilling a well that penetrates the reservoir.
0. 112. An article comprising a machine-readable medium storing instructions operable to cause one or more machines to perform operations comprising:
receiving, in real time at the surface of the Earth, data related to a characteristic of a reservoir, wherein the characteristic comprises at least one of temperature, annulus pressure, formation pressure, fluid flow rate, fluid flow type, formation resistivity, permeability, seismics, cross-well acoustic seismometry. porosity, perforation depth, surface data Logging (SDL) data, well log data, core data, water saturation data, oil saturation data, clay content data, pressure transient data, skin data, estimated reservoir boundary, hydraulic pressure, hydraulic power, or fluid characteristics;
analyzing the data related to the characteristic of the reservoir;
generating a control signal for a control device for an operation relating to the reservoir based, at least in part, on the analyzing of the data; and
transmitting the control signal to the control device for controlling the control device while drilling of a well for developing the reservoir.
0. 129. A method for developing a reservoir, the method comprising:
performing at least one of, drilling a well that penetrates the reservoir, completing of the well, or producing from the well while drilling;
receiving, in real time, data related to a characteristic of drilling the well, completing the well or producing from the well while drilling, wherein the characteristic comprises at least one of temperature, annulus pressure, formation pressure, fluid flow rate, fluid flow type, formation resistivity, permeability, seismics, cross-well acoustic seismometry, porosity, perforation depth, surface data Logging (SDL) data, well log data, core data, water saturation data, oil saturation data, clay content data, pressure transient data, skin data, estimated reservoir boundary, hydraulic pressure, hydraulic power, or fluid characteristics;
analyzing the data related to the characteristic;
generating a control signal for a flow control device based, at least in part, on the analyzing of the data;
transmitting the control signal to the flow control device; and
controlling the flow control device for an operation related to the well, using the control signal.
0. 81. A method for developing a reservoir, the method comprising:
performing at least one of, drilling a well that penetrates the reservoir, completing of the well, or producing from the well while drilling;
receiving, in real time, data related to a characteristic of the reservoir from downhole collected during the at least one of drilling a well that penetrates the reservoir, completing of the well, or producing from the well while drilling, wherein the characteristic comprises at least one of temperature, annulus pressure, formation pressure, fluid flow rate, fluid flow type, formation resistivity, permeability, seismics, cross-well acoustic seismometry, porosity, perforation depth, surface data Logging (SDL) data, well log data, core data, water saturation data, oil saturation data, clay content data, pressure transient data, skin data, estimated reservoir boundary, hydraulic pressure, hydraulic power, or fluid characteristics;
analyzing the data related to the characteristic of the reservoir;
generating a control signal for a controlled equipment based, at least in part, on the analyzing of the data;
transmitting the control signal to the controlled equipment; and
controlling the controlled equipment for an operation related to the well, using the control signal.
0. 1. A method comprising:
receiving data indicative of at least one reservoir characteristic;
determining, in relation to the data, a target production/injection in real time; and
determining a control device setting in relation to the target production/injection.
0. 2. The method of
allocating the target production/injection between one or more selected reservoir management intervals of the reservoir; and
determining the control device setting for a control device associated with at least one of the selected management intervals in relation to the target production/injection.
0. 3. The method of
comparing the target production/injection to an actual production/injection; and
determining the control device setting in relation to a difference between the target production/injection and the actual production/injection.
0. 4. The method of
comparing the target production/injection to an actual production/injection; and
determining the control device setting in relation to a difference between the target production/injection and the actual production/injection.
0. 5. The method of
0. 6. The method of
0. 7. The method of
monitoring for changes in the data indicative of at least one reservoir characteristic; and
if a change is detected, determining the target production/injection.
0. 8. The method of
0. 9. The method of
wherein determining the target production/injection in real time comprises determining a reservoir model adjustment using the data indicative of at least geologic data and determining the target production/injection in relation to the reservoir model.
0. 10. The method of
0. 11. The method of
0. 12. The method of
0. 13. The method of
0. 14. The method of
0. 15. The method of
0. 16. The method of
0. 17. The method of
0. 18. The method of
0. 19. The method of
0. 20. The method of
0. 21. The method of
0. 22. The method of
0. 23. The method of
0. 24. The method of
0. 25. An article comprising a machine-readable medium storing instructions operable to cause one or more machines to perform operations comprising:
determining, in real time, a target production/injection in relation to received data indicative of at least one reservoir characteristic; and
determining a setting for a control device in relation to the target production/injection.
0. 26. The article of
allocating the target production/injection between one or more selected reservoir management intervals;
determining the control device setting for a control device associated with at least one of the selected management intervals in relation to the target/production injection.
0. 27. The article of
comparing the target production/injection to an actual production/injection; and
determining the control device setting in relation to a difference between the target production/injection and the actual production/injection.
0. 28. The article of
comparing the target production/injection to an actual production/injection; and
determining the control device setting in relation to a difference between the target production/injection and the actual production/injection.
0. 29. The article of
0. 30. The article of
0. 31. The article of
monitoring for changes in the data indicative of at least one reservoir characteristic; and
if a change is detected, determining the target production/injection.
0. 32. The article of
0. 33. The article of
wherein determining, in real time, a target production/injection comprises determining a reservoir model adjustment using the data indicative of at least geologic data and determining the target production/injection in relation to the reservoir model.
0. 34. The article of
0. 35. The article of
0. 36. The article of
0. 37. The article of
0. 38. The article of
0. 39. The article of
0. 40. The article of
0. 41. The article of
0. 42. The article of
0. 43. The article of
communicate the setting for the control device to the control device.
0. 44. The article of
0. 45. The article of
0. 46. The article of
0. 47. The article of
0. 48. The article of
0. 49. A system comprising:
at least one processor; and
at least one memory coupled to the processor and storing instructions operable to cause the processor to perform operations comprising:
determining, in real time, a target production/injection in relation to received data indicative of at least one reservoir characteristic; and
determining a setting for a control device in relation to the target production/injection.
0. 50. The system of
allocating the target production/injection between one or more selected reservoir management intervals;
determining the control device setting for a control device associated with at least one of the selected management intervals in relation to the target/production injection.
0. 51. The system of
comparing the target production/injection to an actual production/injection; and
determining the control device setting in relation to a difference between the target production/injection and the actual production/injection.
0. 52. The system of
comparing the target production/injection to an actual production/injection; and
determining the control device setting in relation to a difference between the target production/injection and the actual production/injection.
0. 53. The system of
0. 54. The system of
0. 55. The system of
monitoring for changes in the data indicative of at least one reservoir characteristic; and
if a change is detected, determining the target production/injection.
0. 56. The system of
0. 57. The system of
wherein determining, in real time, a target production/injection comprises determining a reservoir model adjustment using the data indicative of at least geologic data and determining the target production/injection in relation to the reservoir model.
0. 58. The system of
0. 59. The system of
0. 60. The system of
0. 61. The system of
0. 62. The system of
0. 63. The system of
0. 64. The system of
0. 65. The system of
0. 66. The system of
0. 67. The system of
communicate the setting for the control device to a control device.
0. 68. The system of
0. 69. The system of
0. 70. The system of
0. 71. The system of
0. 72. The system of
0. 73. A method comprising:
monitoring data indicative of at least one reservoir characteristic in real time;
if a variance in the data is detected, updating at least one of a nodal analysis, a material balance analysis, reservoir simulation or risked economics analysis; and
determining a control device setting in relation to at least one of the nodal analysis, material balance analysis, reservoir simulation or risked economics analysis.
0. 74. The method of
determining a production/injection forecast; and
determining the control device setting in relation to the production/injection forecast.
0. 75. The method of
0. 76. The method of
0. 77. The method of
0. 78. The method of
0. 79. The method of
0. 80. The method of
0. 82. The method of
0. 83. The method of
0. 84. The method of
0. 85. The method of
0. 86. The method of
0. 87. The method of
0. 88. The method of
0. 89. The method of
0. 90. The method of
0. 91. The method of
0. 92. The method of
0. 93. The method of
0. 94. The method of
0. 95. The method of
0. 96. The method of
0. 97. The method of
0. 98. The method of
0. 100. The system of
0. 101. The system of
0. 102. The system of
0. 103. The system of
0. 104. The system of
0. 105. The system of
0. 106. The system of
0. 107. The system of
0. 108. The system of
0. 109. The system of
0. 110. The system of
0. 111. The system of
0. 113. The article of
0. 114. The article of
0. 115. The article of
0. 116. The article of
0. 117. The article of
0. 118. The article of
0. 119. The article of
0. 120. The article of
0. 121. The article of
0. 122. The article of
0. 123. The article of
0. 124. The article of
0. 126. The method of
generating, based at least in part on the analyzing of the data, a control signal for a controlled equipment used for drilling the well, completing the well, or producing from the well while drilling.
0. 127. The method of
0. 128. The method of
0. 130. The method of
0. 131. The method of
0. 132. The method of
0. 133. The method of
0. 134. The method of
transmitting the control signal to the controlled equipment.
0. 135. The method of
|
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/976,573, filed Oct. 12, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,853,921 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S patent application Ser. No. 09/816,044 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,356,844, filed Mar. 23, 2001 which is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/357,426 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,266,619, filed Jul. 20, 1999, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety as if reproduced herein. This Reissue application Ser. No. 12/436,632, filed May 6, 2009, is a divisional of Reissue application Ser. No. 11/704,369, filed on Feb. 8, 2007, currently pending, both reissue applications are a reissue of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/929,584, filed Aug. 30, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,079,952, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/976,573, filed Oct. 12, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,853,921 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/816,044 filed Mar. 23, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,356,844, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/357,426, filed Jul. 20, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,266,619. The disclosures of the prior applications are considered part of (and are incorporated by reference in) the disclosure of this application.
Historically, most oil and gas reservoirs have been developed and managed under timetables and scenarios as follows: a preliminary investigation of an area was conducted using broad geological methods for collection and analysis of data such as seismic, gravimetric, and magnetic data, to determine regional geology and subsurface reservoir structure. In some instances, more detailed seismic mapping of a specific structure was conducted in an effort to reduce the high cost, and the high risk, of an exploration well. A test well was then drilled to penetrate the identified structure to confirm the presence of hydrocarbons, and to test productivity. In lower-cost onshore areas, development of a field would commence immediately by completing the test well as a production well. In higher cost or more hostile environments such as the North Sea, a period of appraisal would follow, leading to a decision as to whether or not to develop the project. In either case, based on inevitably sparse data, further development wells, both producers and injectors would be planned in accordance with a reservoir development plan. Once production and/or injection began, more dynamic data would become available, thus, allowing the engineers and geoscientists to better understand how the reservoir rock was distributed and how the fluids were flowing. As more data became available, an improved understanding of the reservoir was used to adjust the reservoir development plan resulting in the familiar pattern of recompletion, sidetracks, infill drilling, well abandonment, etc. Unfortunately, not until the time at which the field was abandoned, and when the information is the least useful, did reservoir understanding reach its maximum.
Limited and relatively poor quality of reservoir data throughout the life of the reservoir, coupled with the relatively high cost of most types of well intervention, implies that reservoir management is as much an art as a science. Engineers and geoscientists responsible for reservoir management discussed injection water, fingering, oil-water contacts rising, and fluids moving as if these were a precise process. The reality, however, is that water expected to take three years to break through to a producing well might arrive in six months in one reservoir but might never appear in another. Text book “piston like” displacement rarely happens, and one could only guess at flood patterns.
For some time, reservoir engineers and geoscientists have made assessments of reservoir characteristics and optimized production using down hole test data taken at selected intervals. Such data usually includes traditional pressure, temperature and flow data is well known in the art. Reservoir engineers have also had access to production data for the individual wells in a reservoir. Such data as oil, water and gas flow rates are generally obtained by selectively testing production from the selected well at selected intervals.
Recent improvements in the state of the art regarding data gathering, both down hole and at the surface, have dramatically increased the quantity and quality of data gathered. Examples of such state of the art improvements in data acquisition technology include assemblies run in the casing string comprising a sensor probe with optional flow ports that allow fluid inflow from the formation into the casing while sensing wellbore and/or reservoir characteristics as described and disclosed in international PCT application WO. 97/49894, assigned to Baker Hughes, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The casing assembly may further include a microprocessor, a transmitting device, and a controlling device located in the casing string for processing and transmitting real time data. A memory device may also be provided for recording data relating to the monitored wellbore or reservoir characteristics. Examples of down hole characteristics which may be monitored with such equipment include: temperature, pressure, fluid flow rate and type, formation resistivity, cross-well and acoustic seismometry, perforation depth, fluid characteristics and logging data. Using a microprocessor, hydrocarbon production performance may be enhanced by activating local operations in additional downhole equipment. A similar type of casing assembly used for gathering data is described and illustrated in international PCT application WO 98/12417, assigned to BP Exploration Operating Company Limited, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
Recent technology improvements in downhole flow control devices are disclosed in UK Patent Application GB 2,320,731A which describes a number of downhole flow control devices which may be used to shut off particular zones by using downhole electronics and programing with decision making capacity, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
Another important emerging technology that may have a substantial impact on managing reservoirs is time lapsed seismic, often referred to a 4-D seismic processing. In the past, seismic surveys were conducted only for exploration purposes. However, incremental differences in seismic data gathered over time are becoming useful as a reservoir management tool to potentially detect dynamic reservoir fluid movement. This is accomplished by removing the non-time varying geologic seismic elements to produce a direct image of the time-varying changes caused by fluid flow in the reservoir. By using 4-D seismic processing, reservoir engineers can locate bypassed oil to optimize infill drilling and flood pattern. Additionally, 4-D seismic processing can be used to enhance the reservoir model and history match flow simulations.
International PCT application WO 98/07049, assigned to Geo-Services, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, describes and discloses state of the art seismic technology applicable for gathering data relevant to a producing reservoir. The publication discloses a reservoir monitoring system comprising: a plurality of permanently coupled remote sensor nodes, wherein each node comprises a plurality of seismic sensors and a digitizer for analog signals; a concentrator of signals received from the plurality of permanently coupled remote sensor nodes; a plurality of remote transmission lines which independently connect each of the plurality of remote sensor nodes to the concentrator, a recorder of the concentrated signals from the concentrator, and a transmission line which connects the concentrator to the recorder. The system is used to transmit remote data signals independently from each node of the plurality of permanently coupled remote sensor nodes to a concentrator and then transmit the concentrated data signals to a recorder. Such advanced systems of gathering seismic data may be used in the reservoir management system of the present invention as disclosed hereinafter in the Detailed Description section of the application.
Historically, down hole data and surface production data has been analyzed by pressure transient and production analysis. Presently, a number of commercially available computer programs such as Saphir and PTA are available to do such an analysis. The pressure transient analysis generates output data well known in the art, such as permeability-feet, skin, average reservoir pressure and the estimated reservoir boundaries. Such reservoir parameters may be used in the reservoir management system of the present invention.
In the past and present, geoscientists, geologists and geophysicists (sometimes in conjunction with reservoir engineers) analyzed well log data, core data and SDL data. The data was and may currently be processed in log processing/interpretation programs that are commercially available, such as Petroworks and DPP. Seismic data may be processed in programs such as Seisworks and then the log data and seismic data are processed together and geostatistics applied to create a geocellular model.
Presently, reservoir engineers may use reservoir simulators such as VIP or Eclipse to analyze the reservoir. Nodal analysis programs such as WEM, Prosper and Openflow have been-used in conjunction with material balance programs and economic analysis programs such as Aries and ResEV to generate a desired field wide production forecast. Once the field wide production has been forecasted, selected wells may be produced at selected rates to obtain the selected forecast rate. Likewise, such analysis is used to determine field wide injection rates for maintenance of reservoir pressure and for water flood pattern development. In a similar manner, target injection rates and zonal profiles are determined to obtain the field wide injection rates.
It is estimated that between fifty and seventy percent of a reservoir engineer's time is spent manipulating data for use by each of the computer programs in order for the data gathered and processed by the disparate programs (developed by different companies) to obtain a resultant output desired field wide production forecast. Due to the complexity and time required to perform these functions, frequently an abbreviated incomplete analysis is performed with the output used to adjust a surface choke or recomplete a well for better reservoir performance without knowledge of how such adjustment will affect reservoir management as a whole.
The present invention comprises a field wide management system for a petroleum reservoir on a real time basis. Such a field wide management system includes a suite of tools (computer programs) that seamlessly interface with each other to generate a field wide production and injection forecast. The resultant output of such a system is the real time control of downhole production and injection control devices such as chokes, valves and other flow control devices and real time control of surface production and injection control devices. Such a system and method of real time field wide reservoir management provides for better reservoir management, thereby maximizing the value of the asset to its owner.
The disclosed invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, which show important sample embodiments of the invention and which are incorporated in the specification hereof by reference. A more complete understanding of the present invention may be had by reference to the following Detailed Description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Reference is now made to the Drawings wherein like reference characters denote like or similar parts throughout the Figures.
Referring now to
The resultant output of the system and method of field wide reservoir management is the real time control of downhole production and injection control devices such as chokes, valves, and other flow control devices (as illustrated in
Efficient and sophisticated “field wide reservoir data” is necessary for the method and system of real time reservoir management of the present invention. Referring now to blocks 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7 of
In order to provide for more efficient usage of “field wide reservoir data”, the data may be divided into two broad areas: production and/or injection (hereinafter “production/injection”) data and geologic data. Production/injection data includes accurate pressure, temperature, viscosity, flow rate and compositional profiles made available continuously on a real time basis or, alternatively, available as selected well test data or daily average data.
Referring to box 18, production/injection data may include downhole production data 1, seabed production data 2 and surface production data 3. It will be understood that the present invention may be used with land based petroleum reservoirs as well as subsea petroleum reservoirs. Production/injection data is pre-processed using pressure transient analysis in computer programs such as Saphir by Kappa Engineering or PTA by Geographix to output reservoir permeability, reservoir pressure, permeability-feet and the distance to the reservoir boundaries.
Referring to box 20, geologic data includes log data, core data and SDL data represented by block 5 and seismic data represented by block 7. Block 5 data is pre-processed as illustrated in block 6 using such computer programs such as Petroworks by Landmark Graphics, Prizm by Geographix and DPP by Halliburton to obtain water and oil saturations, porosity, and clay content. Block 5 data is also processed in stratigraphy programs as noted in block 6A by programs such as Stratworks by Landmark Graphics and may be further pre-processed to map the reservoir as noted in block 6B using a Z-Map program by Landmark Graphics.
Geologic data also includes seismic data block 7 that may be conventional or real time 4D seismic data (as discussed in the background section). Seismic data may be collected conventionally by periodically placing an array of hydrophones and geophones at selected places in the reservoir or 4D seismic may be collected on a real time basis using geophones placed in wells. Block 7 seismic data is processed and interpreted as illustrated in block 8 by such programs as Seisworks and Earthcube by Landmark Graphics to obtain hydrocarbon indicators, stratigraphy and structure.
Output from blocks 6 and 8 is further pre-processed as illustrated in block 9 to obtain geostatistics using Sigmaview by Landmark Graphics. Output from blocks 8, 9 and 6B are input into the Geocellular (Earthmode) programs illustrated by block 10 and processed using the Stratamodel by Landmark Graphics. The resultant output of block 10 is then upscaled as noted in block 11 in Geolink by Landmark Graphics to obtain a reservoir simulation model.
Output from upscaling 11 is input into the data management function of block 12. Production/injection data represented by downhole production 1, seabed production 2 and surface production 3 may be input directly into the data management function 12 (as illustrated by the dotted lines) or pre-processed using pressure transient analysis as illustrated in block 4 as previously discussed. Data management programs may include Openworks, Open/Explorer, TOW/cs and DSS32, all available from Landmark Graphics and Finder available from Geoquest.
Referring to box 19 of
Nodal Analysis 15 may be performed using the material balance data output of 14 and reservoir simulation data of 13 and other data such as wellbore configuration and surface facility configurations to determine rate versus pressure for various system configurations and constraints using such programs as WEM by P. E. Moseley and Associates, Prosper by Petroleum Experts, and Openflow by Geographix.
Risked Economics 16 may be performed using Aries or ResEV by Landmark Graphics to determine an optimum field wide production/injection rate. Alternatively, the target field wide production/injection rate may be fixed at a predetermined rate by factors such as product (oil and gas) transportation logistics, governmental controls, gas, oil or water processing facility limitations, etc. In either scenario, the target field wide production/injection rate may be allocated back to individual wells.
After production/injection for individual wells is calculated the reservoir management system of the present invention generates and transmits a real time signal used to adjust one or more interval control valves located in one or more wells or adjust one or more subsea control valves or one or more surface production control valves to obtain the desired flow or injection rate. As above, transmission of the real time signal is not necessarily instantaneous, and can be delayed depending on the communication method. For example, the reservoir management system may signal an operator to adjust a valve. The operator may then travel into the field to make the adjustment or may telephone another operator near the valve to make the adjustment. Also, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that an inter-relationship exists between the interval control valves. When one is opened, another may be closed. The desired production rate for an individual well may be input directly back into the data management function 12 and actual production from a well is compared to the target rate on a real time basis. The system may include programming for a band width of acceptable variances from the target rate such that an adjustment is only performed when the rate is outside the set point.
Opening or closing a control valve 17 to the determined position may have an almost immediate effect on the production/injection data represented by blocks 1, 2, 3; however, on a long term basis the reservoir as a whole is impacted and geologic data represented by blocks 5 and 7 will be affected (See dotted lines from control valve 17). The present invention continually performs iterative calculations as illustrated in box 19 using reservoir simulation 13, material balance 14, nodal analysis 15 and risked economics 16 to continuously calculate a desired field wide production rate and provide real time control of production/injection control devices.
The method on field wide reservoir management incorporates the concept of “closing the loop” wherein actual production data from individual wells and on a field basis.
To obtain an improved level of reservoir performance, downhole controls are necessary to enable reservoir engineers to control the reservoir response much like a process engineer controls a process facility. State of the art sensor and control technology now make it realistic to consider systematic development of a reservoir much as one would develop and control a process plant. An example of state of the art computers and plant process control is described in PCT application WO 98/37465 assigned to Baker Hughes Incorporated.
In the system and method of real time reservoir management of the present invention, the reservoir may be broken into discreet reservoir management intervals—typically a group of sands that are expected to behave as one, possibly with shales above and below. Within the wellbore, zonal isolation packers may be used to separate the producing and/or injection zones into management intervals. An example reservoir management interval might be 30 to 100 feet. Between zonal isolation packers, variable chokes may be used to regulate the flow of fluids into or out of the reservoir management interval.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,547,029 by Rubbo, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference, discloses a controlled reservoir analysis and management system that illustrates equipment and systems that are known in the art and may be used in the practice of the present invention. Referring now to
SCRAMSJ is a completion system that includes an integrated data-acquisition and control network. The system uses permanent downhole sensors and pressure-control devices as well known in the art that are operated remotely through a control network from the surface without the need for traditional well-intervention techniques. As discussed in the background section, continuous monitoring of downhole pressure, temperatures, and other parameters has been available in the industry for several decades, the recent developments providing for real-time subsurface production and injection control create a significant opportunity for cost reductions and improvements in ultimate hydrocarbon recovery. Improving well productivity, accelerating production, and increasing total recovery are compelling justifications for use of this system.
As illustrated in
(a) one or more interval control valves 110 which provide an annulus to tubing flow path 102 and incorporates sensors 130 for reservoir data acquisition. The system 100 and the interval control valve 110 includes a choking device that isolate the reservoir from the production tubing 150. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that there is an inter-relationship between one control valve and another as one valve is directed to open another control valve may be directed to close;
(b) an HF Retrievable Production Packer 160 provides a tubing-to-casing seal and pressure barrier, isolates zones and/or laterals from the well bore 108 and allows passage of the umbilical 120. The packer 160 may be set using one-trip completion and installation and retrieval. The packer 160 is a hydraulically set packer that may be set using the system data communications and hydraulic power components. The system may also include other components as well known in the industry including SCSSV 131, SCSSV control line 132, gas lift device 134, and disconnect device 136. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the well bore log may be cased partially having an open hole completion or may be cased entirely. It will also be understood that the system may be used in multilateral completions;
(c) SEGNETJ Protocol Software is used to communicate with and power the SCRAMSJ system. The SEGNETJ software, accommodates third party products and provides a redundant system capable of by-passing failed units on a bus of the system;
(d) a dual flatback umbilical 120 which incorporates electro/hydraulic lines provides SEGNET communication and control and allows reservoir data acquired by the system to be transmitted to the surface.
Referring to
(e) a surface control unit 160 operates completion tools, monitors the communications system and interfaces with other communication and control systems. It will be understood that an interrelationship exists between flow control devices as one is directed to open another may be directed to close.
A typical flow control apparatus for use in a subterranean well that is compatible with the SCRAMSJ system is illustrated and described in pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/898,567 filed Jul. 21, 1997 by inventor Brett W. Boundin, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
Referring now to blocks 21, 22, 23 of
Referring to box 38, in the system of the present invention, production/injection data is pre-processed using pressure transient analysis programs 24 in computer programs such as Saphir by Kappa Engineering or PTA by Geographix to output reservoir permeability, reservoir pressure, permeability-feet and the distance to the reservoir boundaries.
Referring to box 40, geologic data including log, cores and SDL is collected with devices represented by blocks 25 and 26 as discussed in the background section, or by data sensors and collections well known in the art. Block 25 data is pre-processed as illustrated in block 26 using such computer programs Petroworks by Landmark Graphics, Prizm by Geographix and DPP by Halliburton to obtain water and oil saturations, porosity, and clay content. Block 25 data is also processed in stratigraphy programs as noted in block 26A by programs such as Stratworks by Landmark Graphics and may be further pre-processed to map the reservoir as noted in block 26B using a Z-Map program by Landmark Graphics.
Geologic data also includes seismic data obtained from collectors known in the art and represented by block 27 that may be conventional or real time 4D seismic data (as discussed in the background section). Seismic data is processed and interpreted as illustrated in block 28 by such programs as Seisworks and Earthcube by Landmark Graphics to obtain hydrocarbon indicators, stratigraphy and structure.
Output from blocks 26 and 28 is further pre-processed as illustrated in block 29 to obtain geostatistics using Sigma-view by Landmark Graphics. Output from blocks 28, 29 and 26B are input into the Geocellular (Earthmodel) programs illustrated by block 30 and processed using the Stratamodel by Landmark Graphics. The resultant output of block 30 is then upscaled as noted in block 31 in Geolink by Landmark Graphics to obtain a reservoir simulation model.
Output from the upscaling program 31 is input into the data management function of block 32. Production/injection data collected by downhole sensors 21, seabed production sensors 22 and surface production sensors 23 may be input directly into the data management function 22 (as illustrated by the dotted lines) or pre-processed using pressure transient analysis as illustrated in block 22 as previously discussed. Data Management programs may include Openworks, Open/Explorer, TOW/cs and DSS32, all available from Landmark Graphics and Finder available from Geoquest.
Referring to box 39 of
The Nodal Analysis program 35 uses data from the Material Balance program 34 and Reservoir Simulation program 33 and other data such as wellbore configuration and surface facility configurations to determine rate versus pressure for various system configurations. Additionally, the Nodal Analysis program 35 shares information with the Reservoir simulation program 33, so that each program, Nodal Analysis 35 and Reservoir Simulation 33, may iteratively update and account for changes in the output of the other. Nodal Analysis programs include WEM by P. E. Moseley and Associates, GAP and Prosper by Petroleum Experts, and Openflow by Geographix.
Risked Economics programs 36 such as Aries or ResEV by Landmark Graphics determine the optimum field wide production/injection rate which may then be allocated back to individual wells. After production/injection by individual wells is calculated the reservoir management system of the present invention generates and transmits real time, though not necessarily instantaneous, signals (designated generally at 50 in
Referring to the comparison and decision at 74 and 75, a new forecast could be rejected, for example, if it is considered to be too dissimilar from one or more earlier forecasts in the forecast history. If the new forecast is rejected at 75, then either another forecast is produced using the same updated information (see broken line at 78), or another real time update of the input information is awaited at 71. The broken line at 77 further indicates that the comparison and decision steps at 74 and 75 can be omitted as desired in some embodiments.
The following Table 1 includes a suite of tools (computer programs) that seamlessly interface with each other to generate a field wide production/injection forecast that is used to control production and injection in wells on a real time basis.
TABLE 1
Computer
Program
(Commercial
Source of
Name or Data
Program (name
Flow Chart Number
Input Data
Output Data
Source)
of company)
1. Downhole Prod.
Pressure, temp,
Annulus (between
(across reservoir interval)
flow rates
tubing and
casing) annular
and tubing
pressure (psi),
temp (degrees,
Fahrenheit, Centi-
grade), flow rate)
2. Seabed prod. (at
Pressure, temp,
Pressure,
subsea tree & subsea
flow rates
temperature
manifold)
3. Surface prod. (at
Pressure, temp,
Pressure,
separators, compressors,
flow rates
temperature
manifolds, other surface
equipment)
4. Pressure Transient
Pressure, temp,
Reservoir
Saphir
Kappa
Analysis
flow rates
Permeability
Engineering
Reservoir
PTA
Geographix
Pressure, Skin,
distance to
boundaries
5. Logs, Cores, SDL
Pressure,
temperature
6. Log processing
Saturations
Petroworks
Landmark
(interpretation)
Porosity
Graphics
Clay Content
Prizm
Geographix
DPP
Halliburton
6A. Stratigraphy
Stratworks
Landmark
Graphics
6B. Mapping
Z-Map
Landmark
Graphics
7. Seismic Data
8. Seismic Processing
Hydrocarbon
Seisworks
Landmark
and Interpretation
indicators
Earthcube
Graphics
Stratigraphy
Structure
9. Geostatistics
Sigmaview
Landmark
Graphics
10. Geocellular
Stratamodel
Landmark
Graphics
11. Upscaling
Geolink
Landmark
Graphics
Geoquest
12. Data Management,
Outputs from other boxes
Finder
Landmark
Data Repository
Open works
Graphics
Open/Explore
TOW/cs
DSS32
13. Reservoir simulation
Field or well production
VIP
Landmark
profile with time
Graphics
Eclipse
Geoquest
14. Material Balance
Fluid Saturations,
Hydrocarbon, in-
MBAL
Petroleum
Pressure reservoir
place reservoir
Experts
geometry, temp, fluid
drive mechanism,
physical prop., flow rate,
production profile
reservoir physical
properties
15. Nodal Analysis,
Wellbore configurations,
Rate vs. Pressure
WEM
P. E. Mosely &
Reservoir and Fluid
surface facility
for various
Associates
properties
configurations
system and
GAP
Petroleum
constraints
Prosper
Experts
Openflow
Geographix
16. Risked Economics
Product Price Forecast,
Rate of return, net
Aries
Landmark
Revenue Working
present value,
ResEV
Graphics
Interest, Discount Rate,
payout, profit vs.
Production Profile,
investment ratio
Capital Expense,
and desired field
Operating Expense
wide production
rates.
17. Control Production
Geometry
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the practice of the present invention is not limited to the use of the programs disclosed in Table 1, or any of the aforementioned programs. These programs are merely examples of presently available programs which can be suitably enhanced for real time operations, and used to practice the invention.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the method and system of reservoir management may be used to optimize development of a newly discovered reservoir and is not limited to utility with previously developed reservoirs.
A preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated in the accompanying Drawings and described in the foregoing Detailed Description, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiment disclosed, but is capable of numerous modifications without departing from the scope of the invention as claimed.
Thomas, Jacob, Vidrine, William Launey, Wauters, Jerry Wayne, Godfrey, Craig William, Seller, Douglas Donald
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10083254, | Jun 15 2010 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Method and system for stabilizing formulation methods |
10280722, | Jun 02 2015 | BAKER HUGHES, A GE COMPANY, LLC | System and method for real-time monitoring and estimation of intelligent well system production performance |
10519768, | Feb 21 2018 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Systems and methods for operating hydrocarbon wells to inhibit breakthrough based on reservoir saturation |
10689958, | Dec 22 2016 | WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC | Apparatus and methods for operating gas lift wells |
10920546, | Dec 22 2016 | WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC | Apparatus and methods for operating gas lift wells |
11480053, | Feb 12 2019 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.; Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Bias correction for a gas extractor and fluid sampling system |
11755795, | Sep 22 2017 | EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING COMPANY | Detecting and mitigating flow instabilities in hydrocarbon production wells |
11899410, | Dec 15 2022 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Monitoring a wellbore operation using distributed artificial intelligence |
8469090, | Dec 01 2009 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for monitoring hydrocarbon production |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3045750, | |||
3760362, | |||
3971926, | May 28 1975 | MI DRILLING FLUIDS COMPANY, HOUSTON, TEXAS A TEXAS GENERAL PARTNERSHIP | Simulator for an oil well circulation system |
4461172, | May 24 1982 | In-Situ; Inc. | Well monitoring, controlling and data reducing system |
4559610, | May 04 1983 | Southwest Research Corporation | Gas pumping system analog |
4633954, | Dec 05 1983 | Camco International, Inc | Well production controller system |
4676313, | Oct 30 1985 | Controlled reservoir production | |
4685522, | Dec 05 1983 | Halliburton Company | Well production controller system |
4721158, | Aug 15 1986 | Amoco Corporation | Fluid injection control system |
4738313, | Feb 20 1987 | Delta-X Corporation | Gas lift optimization |
5208748, | Nov 18 1985 | ACTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Method and apparatus for structuring and managing human communications by explicitly defining the types of communications permitted between participants |
5442730, | Oct 08 1993 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adaptive job scheduling using neural network priority functions |
5455780, | Oct 03 1991 | Halliburton Company | Method of tracking material in a well |
5531270, | May 04 1995 | ConocoPhillips Company | Downhole flow control in multiple wells |
5547029, | Sep 27 1994 | WELLDYNAMICS, INC | Surface controlled reservoir analysis and management system |
5565862, | Mar 28 1995 | The Titan Corporation | Collection and management of pipeline-flow data |
5566092, | Dec 30 1993 | Caterpillar, Inc | Machine fault diagnostics system and method |
5597042, | Feb 09 1995 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method for controlling production wells having permanent downhole formation evaluation sensors |
5636693, | Dec 20 1994 | ConocoPhillips Company | Gas well tubing flow rate control |
5662165, | Sep 11 1995 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Production wells having permanent downhole formation evaluation sensors |
5706892, | Feb 09 1995 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Downhole tools for production well control |
5706896, | Feb 09 1995 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for the remote control and monitoring of production wells |
5710726, | Oct 10 1995 | ConocoPhillips Company | Semi-compositional simulation of hydrocarbon reservoirs |
5721538, | Feb 09 1995 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | System and method of communicating between a plurality of completed zones in one or more production wells |
5730219, | Feb 09 1995 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Production wells having permanent downhole formation evaluation sensors |
5732776, | Feb 09 1995 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Downhole production well control system and method |
5764515, | May 12 1995 | Institute Francais du Petrole; Institut Francais du Petrole | Method for predicting, by means of an inversion technique, the evolution of the production of an underground reservoir |
5767680, | Jun 11 1996 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for sensing and estimating the shape and location of oil-water interfaces in a well |
5829520, | Feb 14 1995 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for testing, completion and/or maintaining wellbores using a sensor device |
5841678, | Jan 17 1997 | ConocoPhillips Company | Modeling and simulation of a reaction for hydrotreating hydrocarbon oil |
5842149, | Oct 22 1996 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Closed loop drilling system |
5859437, | Mar 17 1997 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation | Intelligent supervision system with expert system for ion implantation process |
5871047, | Aug 12 1997 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for determining well productivity using automatic downtime data |
5873049, | Feb 21 1997 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Abstraction of multiple-format geological and geophysical data for oil and gas exploration and production analysis |
5881811, | Dec 22 1995 | Institut Francais du Petrole | Modeling of interactions between wells based on produced watercut |
5959547, | Feb 09 1995 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Well control systems employing downhole network |
5975204, | Feb 09 1995 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for the remote control and monitoring of production wells |
5979558, | Jul 21 1997 | WELLDYNAMICS, INC | Variable choke for use in a subterranean well |
5992519, | Sep 29 1997 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Real time monitoring and control of downhole reservoirs |
6002985, | May 06 1997 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Method of controlling development of an oil or gas reservoir |
6021377, | Oct 23 1995 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Drilling system utilizing downhole dysfunctions for determining corrective actions and simulating drilling conditions |
6021662, | Dec 15 1997 | Institut Francais du Petrole | Method for modeling fluid displacements in a porous medium |
6022985, | Jul 08 1994 | AVENTIS PHARMA S A | Process for the preparation of 4-acetoxy-2α-benzoyloxy-5β, 20-epoxy-1, 7β-10β-trihydroxy-9-oxo-tax-11-en-13α-yl(2R,3S)-3-tert-b utoxy-carbonYlamino-2-hydroxy-3-phenylpropionate trihydrate |
6023656, | Dec 30 1996 | Institut Francais du Petrole | Method for determining the equivalent fracture permeability of a fracture network in a subsurface multi-layered medium |
6076046, | Jul 24 1998 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Post-closure analysis in hydraulic fracturing |
6095262, | Aug 31 1999 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Roller-cone bits, systems, drilling methods, and design methods with optimization of tooth orientation |
6098020, | Apr 09 1997 | Shell Oil Company | Downhole monitoring method and device |
6101447, | Feb 12 1998 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Oil and gas reservoir production analysis apparatus and method |
6112126, | Feb 21 1997 | LMHALES, L L C | Adaptive object-oriented optimization software system |
6112817, | May 06 1998 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Flow control apparatus and methods |
6176323, | Jun 26 1998 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Drilling systems with sensors for determining properties of drilling fluid downhole |
6182756, | Feb 10 1999 | Intevep, S.A. | Method and apparatus for optimizing production from a gas lift well |
6192980, | Feb 02 1995 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for the remote control and monitoring of production wells |
6236894, | Dec 19 1997 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Petroleum production optimization utilizing adaptive network and genetic algorithm techniques |
6266619, | Jul 20 1999 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | System and method for real time reservoir management |
6281489, | May 02 1997 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Monitoring of downhole parameters and tools utilizing fiber optics |
6282452, | Nov 19 1998 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Apparatus and method for well management |
6356844, | Jul 20 1999 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | System and method for real time reservoir management |
6397946, | Jan 19 2000 | WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC | Closed-loop system to compete oil and gas wells closed-loop system to complete oil and gas wells c |
6412555, | Jun 18 1998 | Kongsberg Offshore A.S. | System and method for controlling fluid flow in one or more oil and/or gas wells |
6422312, | Jul 08 1998 | Retrievable Information Systems, LLC | Multizone production monitoring system |
6424919, | Jun 26 2000 | Smith International, Inc. | Method for determining preferred drill bit design parameters and drilling parameters using a trained artificial neural network, and methods for training the artificial neural network |
6434435, | Feb 21 1997 | Baker Hughes, Inc | Application of adaptive object-oriented optimization software to an automatic optimization oilfield hydrocarbon production management system |
6442445, | Mar 19 1999 | GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc | User configurable multivariate time series reduction tool control method |
6516293, | Mar 13 2000 | Smith International, Inc | Method for simulating drilling of roller cone bits and its application to roller cone bit design and performance |
6549879, | Sep 21 1999 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Determining optimal well locations from a 3D reservoir model |
6584368, | Mar 19 1999 | GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc | User configurable multivariate time series reduction tool control method |
6609079, | May 14 1998 | Va Tech Elin Transformatoren GmbH | Method and arrangement for ascertaining state variables |
6678569, | Mar 19 1999 | GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc | User configurable multivariate time series reduction tool control method |
6701514, | Mar 27 2000 | Accenture Global Services Limited | System, method, and article of manufacture for test maintenance in an automated scripting framework |
6823296, | Dec 22 2000 | Institut Francais du Petrole | Method for forming an optimized neural network module intended to simulate the flow mode of a multiphase fluid stream |
6826483, | Oct 13 1999 | TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, THE | Petroleum reservoir simulation and characterization system and method |
6853921, | Jul 20 1999 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | System and method for real time reservoir management |
6871118, | Mar 01 2001 | Institut Francais du Petrole | Method for detecting and controlling hydrate formation at any point of a pipe carrying multiphase petroleum fluids |
6954737, | Nov 05 2001 | JOHNSONDIVERSEY, INC | Method and apparatus for work management for facility maintenance |
6980940, | Feb 22 2000 | Schlumberger Technology Corp. | Intergrated reservoir optimization |
6985750, | Apr 27 1999 | BJ Energy Solutions, LLC | Wireless network system |
7047170, | Apr 14 2000 | LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, A CORP MARYLAND | Method of determining boundary interface changes in a natural resource deposit |
7054752, | Jun 02 2003 | Institut Francais du Petrole | Method for optimizing production of an oil reservoir in the presence of uncertainties |
7062420, | Oct 04 2000 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Production optimization methodology for multilayer commingled reservoirs using commingled reservoir production performance data and production logging information |
7072809, | Jul 17 2000 | Gaz De France; Institut Francais du Petrole | Method for modelling fluid displacements in a porous environment taking into account hysteresis effects |
7079952, | Jul 20 1999 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | System and method for real time reservoir management |
7096092, | Nov 03 2000 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and apparatus for remote real time oil field management |
7266456, | Apr 19 2004 | Intelligent Agent Corporation | Method for management of multiple wells in a reservoir |
7277836, | Dec 29 2000 | ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | Computer system and method having a facility network architecture |
7373976, | Nov 18 2004 | Well production optimizing system | |
20020049625, | |||
20030028325, | |||
20030139916, | |||
20030167157, | |||
20040104027, | |||
20040138862, | |||
20040148147, | |||
20040153437, | |||
20040220790, | |||
20040230413, | |||
20040236553, | |||
20050010384, | |||
20050038603, | |||
20050096893, | |||
20050149307, | |||
20050267718, | |||
20050267771, | |||
20050273301, | |||
20050273303, | |||
20060085174, | |||
20060116856, | |||
20060149520, | |||
20070078637, | |||
20070112547, | |||
20070179766, | |||
20070179767, | |||
20070179768, | |||
20070192072, | |||
20070198223, | |||
20070271039, | |||
20070295501, | |||
20080133550, | |||
EP1679424, | |||
GB2320731, | |||
WO2054332, | |||
WO2063130, | |||
WO2063403, | |||
WO2101555, | |||
WO2004049216, | |||
WO2004079144, | |||
WO2004095259, | |||
WO9741330, | |||
WO9749894, | |||
WO9807049, | |||
WO9812417, | |||
WO9837465, | |||
WO9960247, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Nov 01 2001 | GODFREY, CRAIG WILLIAM | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 024985 | /0927 | |
Nov 06 2001 | THOMAS, JACOB | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 024985 | /0927 | |
Nov 20 2001 | VIDRINE, WILLIAM LAUNEY | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 024985 | /0927 | |
Nov 20 2001 | WAUTERS, JERRY WAYNE | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 024985 | /0927 | |
Jan 16 2002 | SEILER, DOUGLAS DONALD | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 024985 | /0927 | |
May 06 2009 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Dec 30 2013 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Nov 16 2017 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Mar 22 2014 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Sep 22 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 22 2015 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Mar 22 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Mar 22 2018 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Sep 22 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 22 2019 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Mar 22 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Mar 22 2022 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Sep 22 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 22 2023 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Mar 22 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |