A method for main beam alignment verification includes providing data pertaining to one or more patterns associated with an antenna, measuring power levels of a signal acquired by the antenna, and comparing the measured power levels with the data to determine whether a direction of the signal is incident upon a main beam of the antenna.
|
1. A method for main beam alignment verification, comprising:
providing data pertaining to one or more patterns associated with an antenna;
measuring, at at least one data receiver, power levels of a signal acquired by the an antenna; and
comparing, at at least one antenna control system, the measured power levels with the data pertaining to one or more patterns associated with the antenna; and
to determine determining, at the at least one antenna control system, whether a direction of the signal is incident upon a main beam of the antenna based on the comparison.
9. A method for main beam alignment verification, comprising:
providing data including main beam and sidelobe angular widths for an antenna;
measuring, at at least one data receiver, power levels of a signal acquired by the an antenna at multiple antenna positions; and
comparing, at at least one antenna control system, the measured power levels with the data pertaining to one or more patterns associated with the antenna; and
to determine determining, at the at least one antenna control system, whether a direction of the signal is incident upon a main beam of the antenna based on the comparison.
16. A method for main beam alignment verification, comprising:
providing data including monopulse error responses for a main beam region and sidelobe regions of an antenna;
measuring, at at least one data receiver and at least one tracking receiver, power levels of a signal acquired by the an antenna at multiple antenna positions; and
comparing, at at least one antenna control system, the measured power levels with the data pertaining to one or more patterns associated with the antenna and including monopulse error responses for a main beam region and sidelobe regions of the antenna; and
to determine determining, at the at least one antenna control system, whether a direction of the signal is incident upon a main beam of the antenna based on the comparison.
0. 32. A non-transitory computer-readable medium containing executable instructions that, when executed by a machine, cause the machine to implement a method for main beam alignment verification, comprising:
receiving measured power levels of a signal acquired by an antenna;
accessing data pertaining to one or more patterns associated with the antenna;
comparing the measured power levels with the data pertaining to one or more patterns associated with the antenna;
determining whether a direction of the signal is incident upon a main beam of the antenna based on the comparison; and
commanding the antenna to be repositioned based on whether the direction of the signal is incident upon the main beam of the antenna.
0. 39. A non-transitory computer-readable medium containing executable instructions that, when executed by a machine, cause the machine to implement a method for main beam alignment verification, comprising:
receiving measured power levels of a signal acquired by an antenna at multiple antenna positions;
accessing data pertaining to one or more patterns associated with the antenna;
comparing the measured power levels with the data pertaining to one or more patterns associated with the antenna;
determining whether a direction of the signal is incident upon a main beam of the antenna based on the comparison; and
commanding the antenna to be repositioned based on whether the direction of the signal is incident upon the main beam of the antenna.
0. 22. A system for determining main beam and sidelobe alignment, comprising:
an antenna for acquiring a signal and outputting a received signal;
a positioner for rotating the antenna to offset positions;
a data receiver for receiving the received signal and outputting data and power of the received signal; and
an antenna control system for controlling the positioner and for processing outputs of the data receiver and a priori data,
wherein the offset positions of the antenna are spaced apart in opposite directions and with equal angular widths, and the system is configured to measure received signal power upon initially acquiring the signal and at each of the offset positions, compare the measured received signal powers with a priori antenna data, and determine main beam and sidelobe alignment based on the comparison.
0. 45. A non-transitory computer-readable medium containing executable instructions that, when executed by a machine, cause the machine to implement a method for main beam alignment verification, comprising:
receiving measured power levels to form measured error responses at multiple antenna positions;
accessing data pertaining to one or more patterns associated with the antenna and including monopulse error responses for a main beam region and sidelobe regions of an antenna;
comparing the measured error responses with the data pertaining to one or more patterns associated with the antenna and including monopulse error responses for a main beam region and sidelobe regions of the antenna;
determining whether a direction of the signal is incident upon a main beam of the antenna based on the comparison; and
commanding the antenna to be repositioned based on whether the direction of the signal is incident upon the main beam of the antenna.
0. 28. A system for determining main beam and sidelobe alignment comprising:
an antenna for acquiring a signal and outputting a received sum signal and received difference signal;
a positioner for rotating the antenna to offset positions;
a data receiver for outputting data and power of the received sum signal;
a tracking receiver for tracking the received difference signal and outputting power of the received difference signal; and
an antenna control system for controlling the positioner and for processing outputs of the tracking receiver and a priori antenna data,
wherein the offset positions of the antenna are spaced apart in opposite directions with equal angular widths and,
received sum signal power is measured upon initially acquiring the signal and at each of the offset positions,
the measured received sum signal powers are compared with the a priori antenna, and main beam and sidelobe alignment are determined based on the comparison.
2. The method for main beam alignment verification of
3. The method for main beam alignment verification of
4. The method for main beam alignment verification of
5. The method for main beam alignment verification of
7. The method for main beam alignment verification of
8. The method for main beam alignment verification of
11. The method for main beam alignment verification of
12. The method for main beam alignment verification of
13. The method for main beam alignment verification of
14. The method for main beam alignment verification of
15. The method for main beam alignment verification of
17. The method for main beam alignment verification of
19. The method for main beam alignment verification of
20. The method for main beam alignment verification of
21. The method for main beam alignment verification of
0. 23. The system of claim 22, wherein the a priori antenna data is a main beam shape and a sidelobe shape.
0. 24. The system of claim 23, wherein the a priori antenna data further comprises satellite ephemeris data.
0. 25. The system of claim 22, wherein the received signal power is measured at each of the offset positions and when the signal is initially acquired with a step track procedure.
0. 26. The system of claim 25, wherein the antenna control system further comprises logic for the step track procedure.
0. 27. The system of claim 22, wherein an automatic gain control signal of the data receiver provides the received signal power.
0. 29. The system of claim 28, wherein the a priori antenna data is monopulse error slope data over extended angular range.
0. 30. The system of claim 28, wherein the received sum signal power at each of the offset positions and upon acquiring the signal is measured with a step track procedure.
0. 31. The system of claim 30, wherein the antenna control system further comprises logic for the step track procedure.
0. 33. The computer-readable medium of claim 32, wherein the one or more patterns include a data pattern.
0. 34. The computer-readable medium of claim 32, wherein the one or more patterns include data and tracking patterns.
0. 35. The computer-readable medium of claim 32, wherein the data includes main beam and sidelobe angular widths for the antenna.
0. 36. The computer-readable medium of claim 32, wherein the data includes monopulse error responses for a main beam region and sidelobe regions of the antenna.
0. 37. The computer-readable medium of claim 32, wherein execution of the instructions further comprises averaging multiple samples of the measured power levels at a common antenna position.
0. 38. The computer-readable medium of claim 32, wherein execution of the instructions further comprises averaging power levels measured in the azimuth coordinate.
0. 40. The computer-readable medium of claim 39, wherein execution of the instructions further comprises averaging of multiple samples of the measured power levels at a common antenna position.
0. 41. The computer-readable medium of claim 39, wherein execution of the instructions further comprises averaging of power levels measured in the azimuth coordinate.
0. 42. The computer-readable medium of claim 39, wherein execution of the instructions further comprises generating a positioner signal to reposition the antenna.
0. 43. The computer-readable medium of claim 39, wherein execution of the instructions further includes generating a positioner signal to reposition the antenna after a determination has been made that the signal is not incident upon the main beam.
0. 44. The computer-readable medium of claim 39, wherein execution of the instructions further comprises generating a positioner signal to reposition the antenna and to align the signal with a sidelobe of the antenna.
0. 46. The computer-readable medium of claim 45, wherein execution of the instructions further comprises determining the monopulse error responses from data and tracking patterns of the antenna.
0. 47. The computer-readable medium of claim 45, wherein execution of the instructions further comprises generating a positioner signal to reposition the antenna.
0. 48. The computer-readable medium of claim 45, wherein execution of the instructions further comprises generating a positioner signal to reposition the antenna after a determination has been made that the signal is not incident upon the main beam.
0. 49. The computer-readable medium of claim 45, wherein execution of the instructions further comprises generating a positioner signal to reposition the antenna and to align the signal with a sidelobe of the antenna.
|
The invention relates generally to antenna tracking and, in particular, to main beam alignment verification for angle tracking antennas.
Tracking antenna systems dynamically follow changes in a direction of a received signal, and position a tracking antenna to align the signal with the peak level of the main beam of the tracking antenna. Such signal alignment results in coincidence of the signal and a portion of the main beam that provides maximum antenna gain and thus system sensitivity.
Various approaches to antenna tracking involve aligning the main beam peak of an antenna with the signal by using open commanding and relative power measurements. One example, referred to as “step track,” involves positioning an antenna in a nominal direction, and commanding the antenna in equal but opposite angular offsets and measuring received signal power at each offset position. If the received signal power levels are equal, the antenna is correctly aligned. If the received power levels are unequal, the difference in the power levels can be used to correct the antenna alignment. The process is repeated in the orthogonal plane. The step track technique is periodically repeated to validate correct antenna alignment and to follow any changes in the direction of the signal.
Other approaches to antenna tracking involve a closed loop technique referred to as “monopulse.” Two types of antenna patterns are used in such techniques. The first type of pattern has a maximum gain value that is coincident with the axis of the antenna, and is used for data reception. The second type of pattern has a null on the axis of the antenna and, to first order, has a linear variation with displacements from the axis and typically a phase difference between the data pattern and the tracking pattern that coincides with the azimuth angle of the signal direction. This behavior, the linear increase with deviation from axis and the phase difference, is used by an antenna control unit as an error signal, thereby permitting implementation of a closed loop tracking system that dynamically follows changes in the direction of the signal.
Unfortunately, these angle-tracking techniques depend upon initial antenna pointing (prior to initiation of antenna tracking) to align the signal within the main beam angular extent of the antenna. In some cases, however, such alignment is not assured.
One prior method for verifying this alignment involves using a smaller guard antenna together with the larger main antenna that is used for data reception. In practice, the smaller antenna is about 1/10 the diameter of the main antenna to obtain the required gain and pattern characteristics to envelope the sidelobes of the main antenna. The signal levels received by the main antenna and the guard antenna are then compared. If the signal level of the main antenna exceeds the signal level of the guard antenna, the antenna is aligned within the main beam where the main antenna gain is higher than the gain of the guard antenna. If the signal level of the main antenna is comparable or less than the signal level of the guard antenna, then the signal is aligned with sidelobes of the main antenna.
In addition to requiring a second antenna, another short-fall of this technique is that the boresight of the guard antenna needs to be maintained coincident with the main antenna. Moreover, the smaller guard antenna needs to be mechanically isolated from the main antenna to avoid deforming the main antenna and its patterns, and the mechanical balance of the assembly needs to be maintained. When the received signal level fluctuates, as commonly occurs with multipath at low elevation angles, the guard antenna requires a second tracking receiver so that the signal levels in the guard and main antennas can be simultaneously measured. Aside from the expense of an additional tracking receiver, the two receivers need to be reliably calibrated so that the same received power level results in the same indicated signal levels. This calibration is needed so that the signal level comparison can be used to reliably verify main beam alignment. Additionally, for large antennas that require a protective radome to avoid pointing errors caused by wind loading, a larger radome that envelops both the main and guard antennas is significantly more expensive than a radome for the main antenna alone.
Thus, it would be useful to be able to provide a main beam alignment verification alternative to the prior approaches. It would also be desirable to be able to provide a cost effective method for verifying the main beam alignment of received signals. It would also be useful to be able to provide a mechanism for verifying main beam alignment without imposing additional hardware capabilities, i.e., using existing antenna hardware.
Various methods for verifying main beam alignment according to the present invention generally involve measuring the width of the lobe containing the received signal. As shown in
As discussed below, various embodiments can be implemented with existing antenna hardware operated in conjunction with appropriate software controls and received power measurements. Furthermore, the methods described herein do not require a guard antenna and, therefore, do not require the additional aperture needed for the guard antenna or an additional tracking receiver to measure the signal levels received by the guard antenna.
Referring to
The example open loop antenna tracking system 500 includes an antenna 502, a positioner 504, a data receiver 506 and an antenna control system 508, configured as shown. The antenna control system 508 is provided with a received signal power input from the data receiver 506. In this example embodiment, satellite ephemeris and antenna data inputs are also provided to the antenna control system 508.
In operation, after the data receiver 506 acquires the signal, a signal level measurement is made. A typical received signal level indication is the automatic gain control (AGC) voltage of the receiver. The antenna 502 is then offset in equal angular increments in opposite directions and the received power levels at each offset position are measured using a step track procedure, for example. In this example embodiment, the measured power levels are used for an additional purpose. The three measured power levels, at the initial acquisition point and the two angularly displaced positions, are then compared to the a priori known main beam shape and the sidelobe shape of the antenna 502. The a priori antenna data and the measured power levels are processed by the antenna control system 508 which includes, for example, a main beam search algorithm in firmware and step track decision logic for sidelobe determination. Because the angular width of the sidelobes is less than that of the main beam, the power level changes at the angular offset positions are more drastic than those at the main beam. By this comparison of the three power levels with the a priori antenna pattern data, decisions are made as to main beam alignment or sidelobe alignment. In this example embodiment, the process is then repeated in an orthogonal direction.
In an example embodiment, open loop commanding techniques are used to find the main beam. By using an open loop command to the next sidelobe peak and/or the main antenna beam, there may be sufficient received signal power to maintain receiver acquisition, and therefore it will not be necessary to move the antenna and try to reacquire the receiver. If the tracking receiver has not acquired, a two-dimensional raster scan (e.g., in azimuth and elevation) can be used. In such a case, once the tracking receiver has acquired, the open loop commanding for antenna repositioning can be used.
Other information can be used in the above search process. For example, in some cases, an estimate of the nominal signal level may be available. Also by way of example, when an acquisition at low elevation angles is being performed, the search for the main beam can exclude those antenna positions where the main beam would be positioned below the horizon.
Signal level fluctuations can have an impact on open loop antenna tracking techniques. Multipath is a common cause of such fluctuations that occurs at low elevation angles. For step track, the fluctuations can be reduced by dwelling at each angular position for a sufficient amount of time to average the power measurements. Averaging at low elevation angles may have limited effectiveness in cases where the multipath has a strong specular component. Averaging, particularly in the elevation coordinate, is less effective since the average of the direct signal and the multipath component has a non-zero mean value. It is generally more effective to average in the azimuth coordinate. An alternative approach is to wait until the satellite has increased in its elevation angle and the spatial filtering of the pattern of the receive antenna reduces multipath. When the satellite is higher above the horizon, a further search for the main beam can be conducted at the anticipated position of the satellite at that time. The main beam acquisition verification method described above can be used for open loop tracking designs using step track techniques or with closed loop monopulse-based tracking designs.
In an example embodiment, a method for main beam alignment verification includes providing data including main beam and sidelobe angular widths for an antenna, measuring power levels of a signal acquired by the antenna at multiple antenna positions, and comparing the measured power levels with the data to determine whether a direction of the signal is incident upon a main beam of the antenna.
In another example embodiment, a method for main beam alignment verification includes providing data pertaining to one or more patterns associated with an antenna, measuring power levels of a signal acquired by the antenna, and comparing the measured power levels with the data to determine whether a direction of the signal is incident upon a main beam of the antenna.
Various methods for verifying main beam alignment according to the present invention involve examining monopulse error response. Referring to
In an example embodiment, a determination is made as to whether a measured monopulse output is consistent with the main beam. By way of example, the monopulse error response is determined a priori by measurements and/or analyses of the tracking system for the antenna. In an example embodiment, the monopulse error response is determined over the linear error response of the main lobe (which for practical antenna designs is typically somewhat less than the width of the main beam as shown in
In an example main beam alignment method, a determination is made as to whether indicated tracking error behavior corresponds to variations that result in the main beam of the antenna.
As discussed above, open loop pointing techniques can be used to realign the antenna with the main beam. The monopulse error response can also be used to realign the antenna to its main beam of the data pattern. As with the open loop tracking technique, measurement and/or analyses can be used to determine the monopulse error response and knowledge of this response can be used in open loop commanding to determine the realignment. Linear regions of the monopulse error response also coincide with the sidelobe peaks, and open loop commanding can be used to reposition the antenna to realign the antenna. Open loop commanding can be used in conjunction with determining whether an error slope corresponds to a value within the main beam or within the sidelobes. If the system has a closed loop monopulse-based tracking system, a combination of the approaches described herein can be used to obtain a further assurance of main beam acquisition.
In an example embodiment, a method for main beam alignment verification includes providing data including monopulse error responses for a main beam region and sidelobe regions of an antenna, measuring power levels of a signal acquired by the antenna at multiple antenna positions, and comparing the measured power levels with the data to determine whether a direction of the signal is incident upon a main beam of the antenna.
Although the present invention has been described in terms of the example embodiments above, numerous modifications and/or additions to the above-described embodiments would be readily apparent to one skilled in the art. It is intended that the scope of the present invention extend to all such modifications and/or additions.
Dybdal, Robert B., Pidhayny, Denny D.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10418702, | Sep 09 2016 | ViaSat, Inc.; Viasat, Inc | Methods and systems for performing antenna pointing to overcome effects of atmospheric scintillation |
8803733, | Sep 14 2011 | MITRE Corporation | Terminal axial ratio optimization |
8935122, | Dec 03 2010 | US Tower Corporation | Alignment detection device |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3164835, | |||
3646558, | |||
3763465, | |||
3997901, | Jun 23 1971 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Method of directing an aerial to a receiver according to a main direction |
4083048, | Dec 20 1976 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | Time alignment error sensor system for range tracking |
4170011, | Dec 28 1977 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air | Precision antenna alignment procedure |
4347514, | Aug 19 1980 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air | Troposcatter system antenna alignment |
4348676, | Sep 09 1980 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Automatic phase alignment system for a tracking antenna |
4696053, | Jul 03 1985 | Canadian Marconi Corporation | Antenna alignment system and method |
4709238, | Apr 27 1984 | ENVIROMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC | Sequential mono-lobe tracker |
4823134, | Apr 13 1988 | Harris Corp. | Shipboard antenna pointing and alignment system |
4888592, | Sep 28 1988 | GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION GIC-4 | Satellite antenna alignment system |
4963890, | Jul 27 1984 | Selenia Spazio S.P.A. | Antenna tracking system using sequential lobing |
4970521, | Oct 18 1989 | Lockheed Martin Corp | Phased array antenna alignment method |
5017929, | Sep 06 1989 | HE HOLDINGS, INC , A DELAWARE CORP | Angle of arrival measuring technique |
5313215, | Jul 10 1992 | GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION GIC-4 | Satellite identification and antenna alignment |
5341147, | Sep 23 1992 | Space Systems/Loral, Inc.; SPACE SYSTEMS LORAL, INC | Method for measuring and correcting antenna RF beam alignment |
5457464, | Jan 14 1991 | EDENLIST LIMITED | Tracking system |
5515058, | Jun 09 1994 | Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc | Antenna alignment apparatus and method utilizing the error condition of the received signal |
5797083, | Dec 22 1995 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Self-aligning satellite receiver antenna |
5912642, | Apr 28 1998 | Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. | Method and system for aligning a sensor on a platform |
5923288, | Mar 25 1997 | Sony Corporation | Antenna alignment indicator system for satellite receiver |
5929809, | Apr 07 1998 | CDC PROPRIETE INTELLECTUELLE | Method and system for calibration of sectionally assembled phased array antennas |
5940028, | Sep 30 1998 | Sony Corporation; Sony Electronics, Inc. | System and method for aligning an antenna |
5964822, | Aug 27 1997 | Delphi Technologies Inc | Automatic sensor azimuth alignment |
6087985, | Oct 14 1997 | RR Elektronische Gerat GmbH & Co. KG | Tracking system |
6087995, | Feb 17 1999 | Anritsu Company | Universal autoradar antenna alignment system |
6320541, | Feb 17 1999 | Raytheon Company | Off-axis indicator algorithm for electrically large antennas |
6335705, | Feb 17 1999 | Anritsu Company | Automotive radar antenna alignment system |
6380908, | May 05 2000 | Raytheon Company | Phased array antenna data re-alignment |
6417803, | Apr 03 2001 | The Boeing Company | Beam alignment system and method for an antenna |
6445343, | Feb 16 2000 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Antenna element array alignment system |
6556166, | Feb 19 2002 | Aptiv Technologies Limited | Method of measuring elevational mis-alignment of an automotive radar sensor |
6580391, | Oct 12 2001 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | Antenna alignment system and method |
6608590, | Mar 04 2002 | Orbit Communication Ltd. | Alignment of antenna polarization axes |
6611236, | Aug 13 1998 | C2SAT communications AB | Antenna device |
6611696, | May 02 2001 | Trex Enterprises Corporation | Method and apparatus for aligning the antennas of a millimeter wave communication link using a narrow band oscillator and a power detector |
6646598, | May 17 2002 | L-3 Communications Corporation | Antenna boresighting method |
6661373, | Oct 16 1998 | Sky CP Limited | Antenna alignment meter |
6690917, | Nov 15 2001 | Qualcomm Incorporated | System and method for automatic determination of azimuthal and elevation direction of directional antennas and calibration thereof |
6714156, | Nov 22 2002 | THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT | Method for correcting radar misalignment |
20030210176, | |||
20040046695, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Aug 29 2007 | The Aerospace Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 15 2013 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Aug 30 2013 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jun 21 2014 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Dec 21 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 21 2015 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jun 21 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jun 21 2018 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Dec 21 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 21 2019 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jun 21 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jun 21 2022 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Dec 21 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 21 2023 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jun 21 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |