The invention relates to a spinal disc endoprosthesis. The endoprosthesis has a resilient body formed of one or more materials which may vary in stiffness from a relatively stiff exterior annular gasket portion to a relatively supple central nucleus portion. Concaval-convex elements at least partly surround that nucleus portion so as to retain the nucleus portion and gasket between adjacent vertebral bodies in a patient's spine. Assemblies of endoprosthetic discs, endoprosthetic vertebral bodies, and endoprosthetic longitudinal ligaments may be constructed. To implant this endoprosthesis assembly, information is obtained regarding the size, shape, and nature of a patient's damaged spine. Thereafter, one or more prosthetic vertebral bodies and disc units are constructed in conformity with that information. Finally, the completed and conformed vertebral body and disc assembly is implanted in the patient's spine.
|
0. 12. A method of surgery comprising:
forming concave surfaces in endplates of confronting vertebral bodies; and
inserting between the formed concave surfaces an intervertebral disc endoprosthesis wherein the intervertebral disc endoprosthesis comprises:
L-shaped supports wherein each of the L-shaped support comprises an exterior convex surface adapted to mate with one of the formed concave surfaces; and
a resilient body interposed between the L-shaped supports.
0. 18. A method of endoprosthetic discectomy surgery comprising:
receiving information about a size, shape, and nature of a patient's involved natural spinal vertebral bodies and natural spinal vertebral discs from an imaging device;
removing at least the involved and damaged natural spinal disc material from the patient's spine;
implanting at least one anchor into a hole having a predetermined position in an anterior surface of at least one adjacent vertebral body;
forming concave surfaces in the adjacent vertebral bodies; and
implanting into the patient's spine, an intervertebral disc endoprosthesis comprising a resilient disc body and concaval-convex elements that at least partly surround and are capable of movement relative to the resilient disc body in the patient's spine.
0. 10. A method of surgery comprising:
implanting at least one anchor into a hole having a predetermined position in an anterior surface of at least one vertebral body;
affixing a bone surface milling mechanism to the at least one anchor;
forming partially hemispherical surfaces in endplates of confronting vertebral bodies using the bone surface milling mechanism;
inserting between the formed partially hemispherical surfaces an intervertebral disc endoprosthesis, comprising:
confronting concaval-convex supports, each support having an exterior convex surface adapted to mate with one of the formed partially hemispherical surfaces, and
a resilient body interposed between the concaval-convex supports such that the supports are capable of movement relative to the resilient body element after the endoprosthesis has been inserted between the formed partially hemispherical surfaces.
1. A method of endoprosthetic discectomy surgery comprising the steps of receiving information about the size, shape and nature of a patient's damaged natural spinal vertebral bodies and discs from radiographs, CT and/or MRI scans or other imaging devices specifically determining the anterior-posterior and lateral dimensions of each involved vertebral body, the vertical height of the anterior aspect of each involved vertebral and/or proximate vertebral body, and the vertical height of the mid-portion of the involved and proximate normal intervertebral disc spaces, thereafter constructing one or more prosthetic vertebral body units and prosthetic disc units in conformity with the received information, each prosthetic disc unit including confronting L-shaped concaval-convex elements and a resilient body interposed between the concaval-convex elements; and an endoprosthetic vertebral body interposed between and engaging the adjacent disc units; and thereafter implanting the completed and conformed construction in the patient's spine.
2. A method according to
3. A method according to
0. 4. A method of surgery comprising the steps of removing a vertebral disc from a patient's spine, forming holes at precisely predetermined locations in bone structure adjacent the location of the removed disc, tapping the holes to form a female thread in each hole, and threadably implanting an anchor into each tapped hole, thereby creating reference points located precisely with respect to the patient's spine, forming concave surfaces in adjacent spinal bone, and inserting between the formed bone surfaces a vertebral disc endoprosthesis including confronting concaval-convex supports, each support having an exterior convex surface adapted to mate with the adjacent formed concave spinal bone surface, the endoprosthesis further including a resilient body element interposed between the concaval-convex supports, and thereafter affixing the concaval-convex supports to the adjacent bone.
0. 5. A method of surgery according to
0. 6. A method of surgery according to
0. 7. A method of surgery according to
0. 8. A method of spinal surgery comprising the steps of forming mounting holes in one or more vertebral bodies of a patient's spine; utilizing said mounting holes to mount a bone mill on a patient's spine; milling confronting bone surfaces on and in the patient's spine to a predetermined surface shape; removing said mill; and thereafter mounting a vertebral disc endoprosthesis having a predetermined outer surface shape by means of the original mounting holes so that outer surfaces of the vertebral disc endoprosthesis mate precisely with the previously milled bone surfaces.
0. 9. A method of endoprosthetic discectomy surgery comprising the steps of receiving information about the size, shape and nature of a patient's involved and proximate normal natural spinal vertebral bodies and natural spinal vertebral discs from known imaging devices, thereafter constructing at least one vertebral disc endoprosthesis comprising a resilient disc body and concaval-convex elements at least partly surrounding the resilient disc body, removing at least the involved, natural spinal discs from the patient's spine, forming concave surfaces in adjacent spinal bone, and thereafter implanting the vertebral disc endoprosthesis in the patient's spine.
0. 11. The method of surgery according to claim 10, further comprising:
removing the bone surface milling mechanism after forming the partially hemispherical surfaces in the endplates of the vertebral bodies.
0. 13. The method of claim 12, further comprising affixing the L-shaped supports to the confronting vertebral bodies.
0. 14. The method of claim 12, further comprising implanting at least one anchor in at least one of the confronting vertebral bodies.
0. 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the implanting is located in an anterior surface of the at least one of the confronting vertebral bodies.
0. 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising affixing a bone surface milling mechanism to the at least one anchor.
0. 17. The method of claim 12, wherein the resilient body comprises a relative stiff portion and a relative supple portion.
0. 19. The method of claim 18, further comprising affixing a bone surface milling mechanism to the at least one anchor.
0. 20. The method of claim 18 wherein the concaval-convex elements are adjacent to the resilient body.
0. 21. The method of claim 18 wherein the concaval-convex elements are in contact with the resilient body.
|
This application and U.S. Ser. No. 10/713,837 are reissue applications of U.S. Pat. No. 5,865,846, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/681,230, filed Jul. 22, 1996, U.S. Pat. No. 5,674,296, and which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/339,490, filed Nov. 14, 1994, which is abandoned.
This invention relates generally to human prostheses, and especially to spinal column vertebral disc prostheses. The invention also relates to surgical procedures for preparing the patient to receive a vertebral disc endoprosthesis, and for implanting that endoprosthesis in the patient's spine.
The herniation of a spinal disc and the often resultant symptoms of intractable pain, weakness, sensory loss, incontinence and progressive arthritis are among the most common of debilitating processes affecting mankind. If a patient's condition does not improve after conservative treatment, and if clear physical evidence of nerve root or spinal cord compression is apparent, and if correlating radiographic studies (i.e., MRI or CT imaging or myelography) confirm the condition, surgical removal of the herniated disc may be indicated. The process of discectomy—as the name implies—involves the simple removal of the disc without attempt to replace or repair the malfunctioning unit. In the United States in 1985, over 250,000 such operations were performed in the lumbar spine and in the cervical spine.
Statistics suggest that present surgical techniques are likely to result in short-term relief, but will not prevent the progressive deterioration of the patient's condition in the long run. Through better pre-operative procedures and diagnostic studies, long-term patient results have improved somewhat. But it has become clear that unless the removed disc is replaced or the spine is otherwise properly supported, further degeneration of the patient's condition will almost certainly occur.
In the mid-1950's and 60's, Cloward and Smith & Robinson popularized anterior surgical approaches to the cervical spine for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease and related disorders of the vertebrae, spinal cord and nerve root; these surgeries involved disc removal followed by interbody fusion with a bone graft. It was noted by Robinson (Robinson, R.A.: The Results of Anterior Interbody Fusion of the Cervical Spine, J. Bone Joint Surg., 440A: 1569-1586, 1962) that after surgical fusion, osteophyte (bone spur) reabsorption at the fused segment might take place. However, it has become increasingly apparent that unfused vertebral segments at the levels above and below the fused segment degenerate at accelerated rates as a direct result of this fusion. This has led some surgeons to perform discectomy alone, without fusion, by a posterior approach in the neck of some patients. However, as has occurred in surgeries involving the lower back where discectomy without fusion is more common as the initial treatment for disc herniation syndromes, progressive degeneration at the level of disc excision is the rule rather than the exception. Premature degenerative disc disease at the level above and below the excised disc can and does occur.
Spine surgery occasionally involves fusion of the spine segments. In addition to the problems created by disc herniation, traumatic, malignant, infectious and degenerative syndromes of the spine can be treated by fusion. Other procedures can include bone grafts and heavy duty metallic rods, hooks, plates and screws being appended to the patient's anatomy; often they are rigidly and internally fixed. None provide for a patient's return to near-normal functioning. Though these procedures may solve a short-term problem, they can cause other, longer term, problems.
A number of attempts have been made to solve some of the problems described above by providing a patient with spinal disc prostheses, or artificial discs of one sort or another. For example, Steffee, U.S. Pat. No. 5,031,437, describes a spinal disc prosthesis having upper and lower rigid flat plates and a flat elastomeric core sandwiched between the plates. Frey et al., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,917,704 and 4,955,908, disclose intervertebral prostheses, but the prostheses are described as solid bodies.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,911,718 and 5,171,281 disclose resilient disc spacers, but no inter-connective or containing planes or like elements are suggested, and sealing the entire unit is not taught.
It is the primary aim of the present invention to provide a vertebral disc endoprosthesis which will perform effectively and efficiently within a patient's spine over a long period of time, and which will not encourage degeneration of or cause damage to adjacent natural disc parts.
It is another object to provide a vertebral disc endoprosthesis which does not require pins or other common mechanical hinge elements, yet which permits natural motion of the prosthetic parts and the adjacent natural anatomy.
It is a related objective to provide a new vertebral disc endoprosthesis surgical procedure which will decrease post-operative recovery time and inhibit post-operative disc, vertebral body and spinal joint degeneration.
It is yet another object to provide a method of installing the endoprosthesis so as to accurately mate the endoprosthesis with an adjacent specifically formed bone surface. An associated object is to provide an endoprosthesis which will encourage bone attachment to, and growth upon, adjacent outer surfaces of the endoprosthesis.
Yet another object is to provide a vertebral endoprosthesis in which the parts are non-oncogenic.
Still another object is to provide a vertebral disc endoprosthesis having a resilient element to accommodate shocks and other forces applied to the spine.
Another object is to provide a highly effective vertebral endoprosthesis which includes several disc endoprostheses and one or more prosthetic vertebral bodies. A related object is to provide these elements in a pre-assembled array for implantation in a patient.
To accomplish these objects, the invention comprises a resilient body formed of a material varying in stiffness from a relatively stiff exterior portion to a relatively supple central portion. A concaval-convex means at least partly surrounds that resilient body so as to retain the resilient body between adjacent vertebral bodies of a patient's spine. If medical considerations so indicate, several disc endoprostheses can be combined with one or more endoprosthetic vertebral bodies in an entire assembly.
To implant this endoprosthesis assembly, information is obtained regarding the size, shape, and nature of a patient's damaged natural spinal discs. If one or more of the patient's vertebral bodies also require replacement, information about those bodies is also obtained. Thereafter, one or more prosthetic disc units and interposed prosthetic vertebral body units are constructed and preassembled in conformity with that information. Finally, the completed and conformed prosthetic disc and vertebral body assembly is implanted in the patient's spine.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings. Throughout the drawings, like reference numerals refer to like parts.
While the invention will be described in connection with a preferred embodiment and procedure, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to this embodiment or procedure. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Turning more specifically to
Concaval-convex means 30 surround the resilient body 20 to retain the resilient body 20 between the adjacent natural vertebral bodies 12, 14 in a patient's spine 10. To this end, as shown in
To discourage and prohibit migration of fluids between the endoprosthesis 18 and adjacent parts of the anatomy, a seal member 110 is attached to the supports 32, 34 so as to surround the resilient body 20 comprised of the gasket 22 and nucleus 24, in accordance with another aspect of the invention. Here, this seal member 110 comprises a flexible sheet material having a multiplicity of pores. Preferably, the pores are from about 5 microns to about 60 microns in size. A flexible, strong polymer sheet material from which this seal is formed can be a Kevlar-like material, or it can be Goretex-like material, or other appropriate biocompatible material, such as polyether, polyurethane, or polycarbonate urethane membranes, can be used. Kevlar material is offered by the E. I. DuPont de Nemours Company of Wilmington, Delaware and Goretex material is offered by the W. T. Gore Company of Flagstaff and Phoenix, Arizona. Known sealing material can be applied to the flexible sheet material so as to render the flexible sheet material substantially impervious to the passage of any fluid. A watertight seal is perfected when the seal 110 is glued or otherwise affixed to the legs 42, 44 and mediate portions of the legs 72, 74 as suggested in
In an alternative embodiment, the watertight seal between the endoprosthesis 18 and adjacent parts of the anatomy can be provided by developing a groove 402 completely encircling the periphery of each of the legs 42, 44. Only one of the grooves is shown in
In use, the seal member 410 is placed about the concaval-convex means 30. The retaining bands 415 are then placed adjacent to the respective groove 402 and crimped anteriorly, thereby fitting the bands into the grooves. Each beaded edge 412 prevents the slipping of the seal member underneath the retaining band. Thus, the retaining band, the groove and the beaded edge all cooperate to provide a water-tight seal to prevent the migration of fluids between the endoprosthesis 18 and adjacent parts of the anatomy. Glue can also be used to affix the seal member to the concaval-convex means 30 as a supplemental means for perfecting the seal.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the supports 32, 34 are formed of a biocompatible metal which may contain chromium cobalt or titanium. Surface roughening or titanium beading 112, 114 on the exterior surfaces 52, 54 of legs 42, 44 encourages positive bonding between the adjacent bone and the convex surfaces 52, 54.
As suggested in
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, multiple endoprosthetic disc units can be placed in series with a straddling interlock appendage providing stability and fixation as shown in
An ear 340 is affixed, as by weldments 341, to a leg 342 extending from a concaval-convex element 322 as illustrated in
The upper disc endoprosthesis 308, the endoprosthetic vertebral body 320, and the lower disc endoprosthesis 318 can all be assembled and interconnected as a unit before implantation in a patient's body when indicated.
As also suggested in
According to yet another aspect of the invention, novel surgical procedures permit effective and permanent installation of the endoprosthetic vertebral body 320 and associated parts. First, a surgeon or medical technician develops information about the size, shape and nature of a patient's damaged vertebral body or bodies from radiographs, CT and/or MRI scans, noting specifically the anterior-posterior and lateral dimensions of the end plate of each involved vertebral body and the vertical height of the anterior aspect of each involved vertebral and/or proximate vertebral body and vertical height of the mid portion of involved and proximate relatively normal intervertebral disc spaces. This information is transmitted by telephone, computer datalink or documentary transport to a specialized laboratory. That laboratory constructs one or more prosthetic assemblies of the sort shown in
When the unit or units have been received and the patient properly prepared, the damaged natural spinal disc or discs and vertebral body or bodies are removed and the adjacent spinal bone surfaces are milled or otherwise formed to provide concave surfaces to receive the confronting convex surfaces 52, 54. Thereafter, the disc units and vertebral body are installed in the patient's spine.
To accurately locate the concaval-convex surfaces in the patient's spine, holes 382A, 384A (
If necessary, a damaged implanted nucleus and/or gasket 24 can be removed and replaced. This can be accomplished by slitting the seal 110; removing the annular gasket 24 and damaged nucleus 22, and replacing them with new, undamaged elements. Thereafter, the seal 110 can be re-established by suturing or gluing closed the slit seal.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2677369, | |||
3486505, | |||
3867728, | |||
3875595, | |||
4023572, | Aug 06 1974 | Milling tool for preparing a joint socket in the prosthetic replacement of a joint | |
4116200, | Oct 01 1975 | Aesculap-Werke Aktiengesellschaft vormals Jetter & Scheerer | Milling tool for surgical purposes |
4179810, | Mar 31 1977 | Device for milling slots in a jawbone for mounting an endossal device | |
4309777, | Nov 13 1980 | Artificial intervertebral disc | |
4349921, | Jun 16 1980 | Intervertebral disc prosthesis | |
4599086, | Jun 07 1985 | Spine stabilization device and method | |
4645507, | Sep 02 1982 | WALDEMAR LINK GMBH & CO | Prosthesis |
4714469, | Feb 26 1987 | PFIZER HOSPITAL PRODUCTS GROUP, INC | Spinal implant |
4743256, | Oct 04 1985 | DEPUY ACROMED, INC | Surgical prosthetic implant facilitating vertebral interbody fusion and method |
4757983, | Feb 26 1985 | HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP | Head and chin for face-down operations |
4759766, | Sep 04 1984 | WALDEMAR LINK GMBH & CO | Intervertebral disc endoprosthesis |
4759769, | Feb 12 1987 | Health & Research Services Inc. | Artificial spinal disc |
4766328, | May 26 1987 | FAIRCHILD TAIWAN CORPORATION | Programmable pulse generator |
4777942, | Oct 02 1986 | SULZER BROTHERS LIMITED, A CORP OF SWITZERLAND | Bone milling instrument |
4800639, | Feb 07 1985 | Sulzer Brothers Limited | Method of making a metal bone implant |
4834757, | Oct 04 1985 | DEPUY ACROMED, INC | Prosthetic implant |
4863476, | Aug 29 1986 | ZIMMER TECHNOLOGY, INC | Spinal implant |
4863477, | May 12 1987 | Synthetic intervertebral disc prosthesis | |
4874389, | Dec 07 1987 | COLLINS, EILEEN E , BENEFICIARY | Replacement disc |
4878915, | Oct 04 1985 | DEPUY ACROMED, INC | Surgical prosthetic implant facilitating vertebral interbody fusion |
4887595, | Jul 29 1987 | DEPUY ACROMED, INC | Surgically implantable device for spinal columns |
4904260, | Aug 20 1987 | RAYMEDICA, LLC | Prosthetic disc containing therapeutic material |
4904261, | Aug 06 1987 | Surgicraft Limited | Spinal implants |
4908032, | Mar 09 1987 | Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. | Reconstruction prosthesis |
4908036, | Jun 15 1987 | Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. | Endoprosthesis |
4911718, | Jun 10 1988 | UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY, THE | Functional and biocompatible intervertebral disc spacer |
4917704, | Jul 09 1987 | Zimmer GmbH | Intervertebral prosthesis |
4932969, | Jan 08 1987 | Zimmer GmbH | Joint endoprosthesis |
4932975, | Oct 16 1989 | Vanderbilt University | Vertebral prosthesis |
4936848, | Sep 22 1989 | ZIMMER SPINE, INC | Implant for vertebrae |
4946378, | Nov 24 1987 | ASAHI KOGAKU KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA, A CORP OF JAPAN | Artificial intervertebral disc |
4955908, | Jul 09 1987 | Zimmer GmbH | Metallic intervertebral prosthesis |
4978355, | Jan 25 1985 | Sulzer Brothers Limited | Plastic bone implant having a reinforced contact surface |
4997432, | Mar 23 1988 | Waldemar Link GmbH & Co | Surgical instrument set |
5002576, | Jun 06 1988 | GERHARD, FUHRMANN; ULRICH GROSS; KADEN, BERTRAM; KRANZ, CURT; SCHMITZ, HERMAN-JOSEF; FRITZ, THOMAS | Intervertebral disk endoprosthesis |
5015247, | Jun 13 1988 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Threaded spinal implant |
5035716, | Dec 07 1987 | COLLINS, EILEEN E , BENEFICIARY | Replacement disc |
5047055, | Dec 21 1990 | HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP | Hydrogel intervertebral disc nucleus |
5059193, | Nov 20 1989 | ZIMMER SPINE, INC | Expandable spinal implant and surgical method |
5059194, | Feb 12 1990 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Cervical distractor |
5062845, | May 10 1989 | ZIMMER SPINE, INC | Method of making an intervertebral reamer |
5071437, | Feb 15 1989 | DEPUY ACROMED, INC | Artificial disc |
5080662, | Nov 27 1989 | Spinal stereotaxic device and method | |
5084048, | Jul 12 1989 | Zimmer GmbH | Implant for vertebrae with spinal stabilizer |
5108438, | Jul 20 1987 | ReGen Corporation | Prosthetic intervertebral disc |
5122130, | Mar 23 1988 | Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. | Forceps for inserting intervertebral device |
5123926, | Feb 22 1991 | Perumala Corporation | Artificial spinal prosthesis |
5171280, | Apr 20 1990 | Zimmer GmbH | Intervertebral prosthesis |
5171281, | Aug 18 1988 | UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY, THE | Functional and biocompatible intervertebral disc spacer containing elastomeric material of varying hardness |
5176708, | Mar 12 1990 | SULZER BROTHERS LIMITED, A CORP OF SWITZERLAND | Prosthetic implant |
5192326, | Dec 21 1990 | HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP | Hydrogel bead intervertebral disc nucleus |
5192327, | Mar 22 1991 | DEPUY ACROMED, INC | Surgical prosthetic implant for vertebrae |
5234431, | Apr 03 1991 | Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. | Bone plate arrangement |
5236460, | Feb 12 1990 | MIDAS REX, L P | Vertebral body prosthesis |
5246458, | Oct 07 1992 | Artificial disk | |
5258031, | Jan 06 1992 | SDGI Holdings, Inc | Intervertebral disk arthroplasty |
5261911, | Jun 18 1991 | Anterolateral spinal fixation system | |
5261913, | Jul 26 1989 | Aesculap AG | Device for straightening, securing, compressing and elongating the spinal column |
5306308, | Oct 23 1989 | Intervertebral implant | |
5314477, | Mar 07 1990 | SPINE SOLUTIONS, INC | Prosthesis for intervertebral discs and instruments for implanting it |
5314478, | Mar 29 1991 | KYOCERA CORPORATION, A CORP OF DE ; KABUSHIKI KAISHA BIOMATERIAL UNIVERSE, A CORP OF JAPAN | Artificial bone connection prosthesis |
5320644, | Aug 30 1991 | Zimmer GmbH | Intervertebral disk prosthesis |
5370697, | Apr 21 1992 | Sulzer Medizinaltechnik AG | Artificial intervertebral disk member |
5383933, | Dec 02 1991 | Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. | Endoprosthesis |
5401269, | Mar 13 1992 | Waldemar Link GmbH & Co | Intervertebral disc endoprosthesis |
5403314, | Feb 05 1993 | DEPUY ACROMED, INC | Apparatus for retaining spinal elements in a desired spatial relationship |
5425772, | Sep 20 1993 | DEPUY ACROMED, INC | Prosthetic implant for intervertebral spinal fusion |
5425773, | Apr 05 1994 | SDGI Holdings, Inc | Intervertebral disk arthroplasty device |
5443514, | Oct 01 1993 | DEPUY ACROMED, INC | Method for using spinal implants |
5456719, | Sep 19 1991 | Waldemar Link GmbH & Co | Endoprosthesis with a prosthesis part made of viscoelastic synthetic resin |
5458638, | Jul 06 1989 | ZIMMER SPINE, INC | Non-threaded spinal implant |
5458642, | Jan 18 1994 | Synthetic intervertebral disc | |
5484437, | Jun 13 1988 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants |
5489307, | Feb 10 1993 | ZIMMER SPINE, INC | Spinal stabilization surgical method |
5489308, | Jul 06 1989 | ZIMMER SPINE, INC | Spinal implant |
5496318, | Jan 08 1993 | ENCORE MEDICAL, L P ; ENCORE MEDICAL IHC, INC ; Encore Medical Asset Corporation | Interspinous segmental spine fixation device |
5507816, | Dec 04 1991 | Synthes USA, LLC | Spinal vertebrae implants |
5514180, | Jan 14 1994 | Prosthetic intervertebral devices | |
5527315, | Apr 21 1994 | Aesculap AG | Spinal osteosynthesis rod with three branches |
5534028, | Apr 20 1993 | HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP | Hydrogel intervertebral disc nucleus with diminished lateral bulging |
5534029, | Dec 14 1992 | Yumiko, Shima | Articulated vertebral body spacer |
5534030, | Feb 09 1993 | DEPUY ACROMED, INC | Spine disc |
5545229, | Aug 18 1988 | UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY, THE | Functional and biocompatible intervertebral disc spacer containing elastomeric material of varying hardness |
5549679, | May 20 1994 | SPINEOLOGY, INC | Expandable fabric implant for stabilizing the spinal motion segment |
5556431, | Mar 13 1992 | Waldemar Link GmbH & Co | Intervertebral disc endoprosthesis |
5562738, | Apr 05 1994 | SDGI Holdings, Inc | Intervertebral disk arthroplasty device |
5571189, | May 20 1994 | SPINEOLOGY, INC | Expandable fabric implant for stabilizing the spinal motion segment |
5593409, | Jun 03 1988 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Interbody spinal fusion implants |
5609636, | May 23 1994 | ZIMMER SPINE, INC | Spinal implant |
5645598, | Jan 16 1996 | HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP | Spinal fusion device with porous material |
5649926, | Jul 14 1994 | Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc. | Spinal segmental reduction derotational fixation system |
5658285, | Oct 28 1994 | Aesculap AG | Rehabitable connecting-screw device for a bone joint, intended in particular for stabilizing at least two vertebrae |
5662158, | Feb 18 1994 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Self-lubricating implantable articulation member |
5674294, | Sep 14 1993 | COMMISSARIAT A L ENERGIE ATOMIQUE; UNIVERSITE PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE PARIS VI | Intervertebral disk prosthesis |
5674295, | Oct 17 1994 | RAYMEDICA, LLC | Prosthetic spinal disc nucleus |
5674296, | Nov 14 1994 | MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INC | Human spinal disc prosthesis |
5676701, | Jan 14 1993 | HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP | Low wear artificial spinal disc |
5683464, | May 04 1992 | Zimmer Dental, Inc | Spinal disk implantation kit |
5702450, | Jun 28 1993 | Intervertebral disk prosthesis | |
5713899, | Apr 27 1995 | Aesculap AG | Cervical cage designed for the performance of intersomatic arthrodesis |
5716415, | Oct 01 1993 | DEPUY ACROMED, INC | Spinal implant |
5720748, | Feb 10 1993 | ZIMMER SPINE, INC | Spinal stabilization surgical apparatus |
5722977, | Jan 24 1996 | DANEK MEDICAL, INC | Method and means for anterior lumbar exact cut with quadrilateral osteotome and precision guide/spacer |
5723013, | Feb 06 1995 | JBS S A | Spacer implant for substituting missing vertebrae |
5741253, | Jun 13 1988 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Method for inserting spinal implants |
5782830, | Feb 20 1996 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Implant insertion device |
5782832, | Oct 01 1996 | HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP | Spinal fusion implant and method of insertion thereof |
5797909, | Jun 13 1988 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Apparatus for inserting spinal implants |
5824093, | Oct 17 1994 | RAYMEDICA, LLC | Prosthetic spinal disc nucleus |
5824094, | Oct 17 1997 | TLIF, LLC | Spinal disc |
5865846, | Nov 14 1994 | Human spinal disc prosthesis | |
5865848, | Sep 12 1997 | Artifex, Ltd.; BHC Engineering, L.P. | Dynamic intervertebral spacer and method of use |
5885300, | Apr 01 1996 | Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Guide apparatus of intervertebral implant |
5888197, | Jul 01 1997 | THOMPSON SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC | Cam-operated universal latch joint apparatus |
5888226, | Nov 12 1997 | Intervertebral prosthetic disc | |
5897087, | Mar 15 1994 | THOMPSON SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC | CAM tightened universal joint clamp |
5902233, | Dec 13 1996 | THOMPSON SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC | Angling surgical retractor apparatus and method of retracting anatomy |
5928284, | Jul 09 1998 | Disc replacement prosthesis | |
5947971, | Feb 10 1993 | ZIMMER SPINE, INC | Spinal stabilization surgical apparatus |
5976187, | Jan 21 1997 | Spinal Innovations, LLC | Fusion implant |
5984865, | Sep 15 1998 | THOMPSON SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC | Surgical retractor having locking interchangeable blades |
5989291, | Feb 26 1998 | HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP; HOWMEDICA OTEONICS CORP | Intervertebral spacer device |
6001130, | Nov 14 1994 | MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INC | Human spinal disc prosthesis with hinges |
6017008, | Mar 15 1994 | Thompson Surgical Instruments, Inc. | Cam tightened universal joint clamp |
6022376, | Jun 06 1997 | RAYMEDICA, LLC | Percutaneous prosthetic spinal disc nucleus and method of manufacture |
6033363, | Jan 26 1999 | Thompson Surgical Instruments | Insulating sleeve for a table mounted retractor |
6059790, | Aug 29 1997 | ZIMMER SPINE, INC | Apparatus and method for spinal stabilization |
6059829, | Mar 08 1995 | Synthes USA, LLC | Intervertebral implant |
6063121, | Jul 29 1998 | Vertebral body prosthesis | |
6066174, | Oct 16 1995 | SDGI Holdings, Inc | Implant insertion device |
6080155, | Jun 13 1988 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Method of inserting and preloading spinal implants |
6083228, | Jun 09 1998 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Device and method for preparing a space between adjacent vertebrae to receive an insert |
6086595, | Aug 29 1997 | ZIMMER SPINE, INC | Apparatus and method for spinal stabilization |
6096038, | Jun 10 1991 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Apparatus for inserting spinal implants |
6139579, | Oct 31 1997 | DEPUY ACROMED, INC | Spinal disc |
6156067, | Nov 14 1994 | MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INC | Human spinal disc prosthesis |
6162252, | Dec 12 1997 | DEPUY ACROMED, INC | Artificial spinal disc |
6179874, | Apr 23 1998 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Articulating spinal implant |
6228022, | Oct 28 1998 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Methods and instruments for spinal surgery |
6228026, | Jan 23 1998 | Rultract, Inc. | Surgical support apparatus with splined coupling, cross bar support and head-to-toe extension for surgical retractor apparatus |
6231609, | Jul 09 1998 | Disc replacement prosthesis | |
DE2263842, | |||
DE2804936, | |||
DE3023353, | |||
DE3741493, | |||
DE90000943, | |||
EP560140, | |||
EP176728, | |||
SU1560184, | |||
SU895433, | |||
WO4839, | |||
WO4851, | |||
WO13619, | |||
WO13620, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 02 2001 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Oct 11 2002 | Spinal Dynamics Corporation | MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INC | MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME | 013669 | /0543 | |
Jan 28 2005 | MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INC | SDGI Holdings, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 015635 | /0232 | |
Apr 28 2006 | SDGI Holdings, Inc | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019064 | /0771 | |
Apr 28 2006 | SOFAMOR DANEK HOLDINGS, INC | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019064 | /0771 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 10 2003 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jul 26 2014 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jan 26 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 26 2015 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jul 26 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jul 26 2018 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jan 26 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 26 2019 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jul 26 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jul 26 2022 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jan 26 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 26 2023 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jul 26 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |