The invention relates to a spinal disc endoprosthesis. The endoprosthesis has a resilient body formed of one or more materials which may vary in stiffness from a relatively stiff exterior annular gasket portion to a relatively supple central nucleus portion. Concaval-convex elements at least partly surround that nucleus portion so as to retain the nucleus portion and gasket between adjacent vertebral bodies in a patient's spine. Assemblies of endoprosthetic discs, endoprosthetic vertebral bodies, and endoprosthetic longitudinal ligaments may be constructed. To implant this endoprosthesis assembly, information is obtained regarding the size, shape, and nature of a patient's damaged spine. Thereafter, one or more prosthetic vertebral bodies and disc units are constructed in conformity with that information. Finally, the completed and conformed vertebral body and disc assembly is implanted in the patient's spine.

Patent
   RE42576
Priority
Nov 14 1994
Filed
Feb 02 2001
Issued
Jul 26 2011
Expiry
Nov 14 2014
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
0
158
EXPIRED
0. 12. A method of surgery comprising:
forming concave surfaces in endplates of confronting vertebral bodies; and
inserting between the formed concave surfaces an intervertebral disc endoprosthesis wherein the intervertebral disc endoprosthesis comprises:
L-shaped supports wherein each of the L-shaped support comprises an exterior convex surface adapted to mate with one of the formed concave surfaces; and
a resilient body interposed between the L-shaped supports.
0. 18. A method of endoprosthetic discectomy surgery comprising:
receiving information about a size, shape, and nature of a patient's involved natural spinal vertebral bodies and natural spinal vertebral discs from an imaging device;
removing at least the involved and damaged natural spinal disc material from the patient's spine;
implanting at least one anchor into a hole having a predetermined position in an anterior surface of at least one adjacent vertebral body;
forming concave surfaces in the adjacent vertebral bodies; and
implanting into the patient's spine, an intervertebral disc endoprosthesis comprising a resilient disc body and concaval-convex elements that at least partly surround and are capable of movement relative to the resilient disc body in the patient's spine.
0. 10. A method of surgery comprising:
implanting at least one anchor into a hole having a predetermined position in an anterior surface of at least one vertebral body;
affixing a bone surface milling mechanism to the at least one anchor;
forming partially hemispherical surfaces in endplates of confronting vertebral bodies using the bone surface milling mechanism;
inserting between the formed partially hemispherical surfaces an intervertebral disc endoprosthesis, comprising:
confronting concaval-convex supports, each support having an exterior convex surface adapted to mate with one of the formed partially hemispherical surfaces, and
a resilient body interposed between the concaval-convex supports such that the supports are capable of movement relative to the resilient body element after the endoprosthesis has been inserted between the formed partially hemispherical surfaces.
1. A method of endoprosthetic discectomy surgery comprising the steps of receiving information about the size, shape and nature of a patient's damaged natural spinal vertebral bodies and discs from radiographs, CT and/or MRI scans or other imaging devices specifically determining the anterior-posterior and lateral dimensions of each involved vertebral body, the vertical height of the anterior aspect of each involved vertebral and/or proximate vertebral body, and the vertical height of the mid-portion of the involved and proximate normal intervertebral disc spaces, thereafter constructing one or more prosthetic vertebral body units and prosthetic disc units in conformity with the received information, each prosthetic disc unit including confronting L-shaped concaval-convex elements and a resilient body interposed between the concaval-convex elements; and an endoprosthetic vertebral body interposed between and engaging the adjacent disc units; and thereafter implanting the completed and conformed construction in the patient's spine.
2. A method according to claim 1 including the step of constructing a plurality of prosthetic disc units and further including the step of attaching the disc units to an endoprosthetic vertebral body prior to the step of supplying the assembly to the surgeon.
3. A method according to claim 1 further including the steps of surgically milling spinal bone surfaces with concave surfaces to receive confronting convex surfaces of the concaval-convex elements, and installing at least one disc unit having concaval-convex elements with said convex surfaces in the patient's spine.
0. 4. A method of surgery comprising the steps of removing a vertebral disc from a patient's spine, forming holes at precisely predetermined locations in bone structure adjacent the location of the removed disc, tapping the holes to form a female thread in each hole, and threadably implanting an anchor into each tapped hole, thereby creating reference points located precisely with respect to the patient's spine, forming concave surfaces in adjacent spinal bone, and inserting between the formed bone surfaces a vertebral disc endoprosthesis including confronting concaval-convex supports, each support having an exterior convex surface adapted to mate with the adjacent formed concave spinal bone surface, the endoprosthesis further including a resilient body element interposed between the concaval-convex supports, and thereafter affixing the concaval-convex supports to the adjacent bone.
0. 5. A method of surgery according to claim 4 further including the step of temporarily locating a bone surface milling jig at the site of the removed vertebral disc by means of said anchors prior to implanting said disc endoprosthesis.
0. 6. A method of surgery according to claim 4 further including the steps of attaching a screw to each concaval-convex support and screwing said screw into the implanted anchor.
0. 7. A method of surgery according to claim 4 further comprising the steps of identifying a damaged resilient nucleus body element or annular gasket in an implanted endoprosthesis, removing said damaged nucleus body element or annular gasket from the endoprosthesis and inserting a new, undamaged nucleus body element or annular gasket into the endoprosthesis without removing the concaval-convex supports from the patient's spine.
0. 8. A method of spinal surgery comprising the steps of forming mounting holes in one or more vertebral bodies of a patient's spine; utilizing said mounting holes to mount a bone mill on a patient's spine; milling confronting bone surfaces on and in the patient's spine to a predetermined surface shape; removing said mill; and thereafter mounting a vertebral disc endoprosthesis having a predetermined outer surface shape by means of the original mounting holes so that outer surfaces of the vertebral disc endoprosthesis mate precisely with the previously milled bone surfaces.
0. 9. A method of endoprosthetic discectomy surgery comprising the steps of receiving information about the size, shape and nature of a patient's involved and proximate normal natural spinal vertebral bodies and natural spinal vertebral discs from known imaging devices, thereafter constructing at least one vertebral disc endoprosthesis comprising a resilient disc body and concaval-convex elements at least partly surrounding the resilient disc body, removing at least the involved, natural spinal discs from the patient's spine, forming concave surfaces in adjacent spinal bone, and thereafter implanting the vertebral disc endoprosthesis in the patient's spine.
0. 11. The method of surgery according to claim 10, further comprising:
removing the bone surface milling mechanism after forming the partially hemispherical surfaces in the endplates of the vertebral bodies.
0. 13. The method of claim 12, further comprising affixing the L-shaped supports to the confronting vertebral bodies.
0. 14. The method of claim 12, further comprising implanting at least one anchor in at least one of the confronting vertebral bodies.
0. 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the implanting is located in an anterior surface of the at least one of the confronting vertebral bodies.
0. 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising affixing a bone surface milling mechanism to the at least one anchor.
0. 17. The method of claim 12, wherein the resilient body comprises a relative stiff portion and a relative supple portion.
0. 19. The method of claim 18, further comprising affixing a bone surface milling mechanism to the at least one anchor.
0. 20. The method of claim 18 wherein the concaval-convex elements are adjacent to the resilient body.
0. 21. The method of claim 18 wherein the concaval-convex elements are in contact with the resilient body.

This application and U.S. Ser. No. 10/713,837 are reissue applications of U.S. Pat. No. 5,865,846, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/681,230, filed Jul. 22, 1996, U.S. Pat. No. 5,674,296, and which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/339,490, filed Nov. 14, 1994, which is abandoned.

This invention relates generally to human prostheses, and especially to spinal column vertebral disc prostheses. The invention also relates to surgical procedures for preparing the patient to receive a vertebral disc endoprosthesis, and for implanting that endoprosthesis in the patient's spine.

The herniation of a spinal disc and the often resultant symptoms of intractable pain, weakness, sensory loss, incontinence and progressive arthritis are among the most common of debilitating processes affecting mankind. If a patient's condition does not improve after conservative treatment, and if clear physical evidence of nerve root or spinal cord compression is apparent, and if correlating radiographic studies (i.e., MRI or CT imaging or myelography) confirm the condition, surgical removal of the herniated disc may be indicated. The process of discectomy—as the name implies—involves the simple removal of the disc without attempt to replace or repair the malfunctioning unit. In the United States in 1985, over 250,000 such operations were performed in the lumbar spine and in the cervical spine.

Statistics suggest that present surgical techniques are likely to result in short-term relief, but will not prevent the progressive deterioration of the patient's condition in the long run. Through better pre-operative procedures and diagnostic studies, long-term patient results have improved somewhat. But it has become clear that unless the removed disc is replaced or the spine is otherwise properly supported, further degeneration of the patient's condition will almost certainly occur.

In the mid-1950's and 60's, Cloward and Smith & Robinson popularized anterior surgical approaches to the cervical spine for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease and related disorders of the vertebrae, spinal cord and nerve root; these surgeries involved disc removal followed by interbody fusion with a bone graft. It was noted by Robinson (Robinson, R.A.: The Results of Anterior Interbody Fusion of the Cervical Spine, J. Bone Joint Surg., 440A: 1569-1586, 1962) that after surgical fusion, osteophyte (bone spur) reabsorption at the fused segment might take place. However, it has become increasingly apparent that unfused vertebral segments at the levels above and below the fused segment degenerate at accelerated rates as a direct result of this fusion. This has led some surgeons to perform discectomy alone, without fusion, by a posterior approach in the neck of some patients. However, as has occurred in surgeries involving the lower back where discectomy without fusion is more common as the initial treatment for disc herniation syndromes, progressive degeneration at the level of disc excision is the rule rather than the exception. Premature degenerative disc disease at the level above and below the excised disc can and does occur.

Spine surgery occasionally involves fusion of the spine segments. In addition to the problems created by disc herniation, traumatic, malignant, infectious and degenerative syndromes of the spine can be treated by fusion. Other procedures can include bone grafts and heavy duty metallic rods, hooks, plates and screws being appended to the patient's anatomy; often they are rigidly and internally fixed. None provide for a patient's return to near-normal functioning. Though these procedures may solve a short-term problem, they can cause other, longer term, problems.

A number of attempts have been made to solve some of the problems described above by providing a patient with spinal disc prostheses, or artificial discs of one sort or another. For example, Steffee, U.S. Pat. No. 5,031,437, describes a spinal disc prosthesis having upper and lower rigid flat plates and a flat elastomeric core sandwiched between the plates. Frey et al., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,917,704 and 4,955,908, disclose intervertebral prostheses, but the prostheses are described as solid bodies.

U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,911,718 and 5,171,281 disclose resilient disc spacers, but no inter-connective or containing planes or like elements are suggested, and sealing the entire unit is not taught.

It is the primary aim of the present invention to provide a vertebral disc endoprosthesis which will perform effectively and efficiently within a patient's spine over a long period of time, and which will not encourage degeneration of or cause damage to adjacent natural disc parts.

It is another object to provide a vertebral disc endoprosthesis which does not require pins or other common mechanical hinge elements, yet which permits natural motion of the prosthetic parts and the adjacent natural anatomy.

It is a related objective to provide a new vertebral disc endoprosthesis surgical procedure which will decrease post-operative recovery time and inhibit post-operative disc, vertebral body and spinal joint degeneration.

It is yet another object to provide a method of installing the endoprosthesis so as to accurately mate the endoprosthesis with an adjacent specifically formed bone surface. An associated object is to provide an endoprosthesis which will encourage bone attachment to, and growth upon, adjacent outer surfaces of the endoprosthesis.

Yet another object is to provide a vertebral endoprosthesis in which the parts are non-oncogenic.

Still another object is to provide a vertebral disc endoprosthesis having a resilient element to accommodate shocks and other forces applied to the spine.

Another object is to provide a highly effective vertebral endoprosthesis which includes several disc endoprostheses and one or more prosthetic vertebral bodies. A related object is to provide these elements in a pre-assembled array for implantation in a patient.

To accomplish these objects, the invention comprises a resilient body formed of a material varying in stiffness from a relatively stiff exterior portion to a relatively supple central portion. A concaval-convex means at least partly surrounds that resilient body so as to retain the resilient body between adjacent vertebral bodies of a patient's spine. If medical considerations so indicate, several disc endoprostheses can be combined with one or more endoprosthetic vertebral bodies in an entire assembly.

To implant this endoprosthesis assembly, information is obtained regarding the size, shape, and nature of a patient's damaged natural spinal discs. If one or more of the patient's vertebral bodies also require replacement, information about those bodies is also obtained. Thereafter, one or more prosthetic disc units and interposed prosthetic vertebral body units are constructed and preassembled in conformity with that information. Finally, the completed and conformed prosthetic disc and vertebral body assembly is implanted in the patient's spine.

Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings. Throughout the drawings, like reference numerals refer to like parts.

FIG. 1 is a fragmentary vertical view of a portion of a human spine in which is installed a novel vertebral disc endoprosthesis embodying the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a fragmentary side elevational view similar to FIG. 1 showing the elements of a patient's spine and having a novel vertebral disc endoprosthesis embodying the present invention installed therein;

FIG. 3 is a sectional view taken substantially in the plane of line 3-3 in FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is an exploded view of the novel vertebral disc endoprosthesis;

FIG. 5 is a vertical fragmentary view of a patient's spine similar to FIG. 1, but showing a series of novel disc endoprosthesis units installed in the spine and interconnected to one another;

FIG. 6 is a fragmentary sectional view of a patient's spine similar to FIG. 3 and taken along line 6-6 in FIG. 5, but showing a natural upper vertebral body, and upper endoprosthetic disc; an adjacent endoprosthetic vertebral body; a second or lower endoprosthetic disc; and a second or lower natural vertebral body;

FIG. 7 is a sectional view taken substantially in the plane of line 7-7 of FIG. 6;

FIG. 8 is a fragmentary side elevational view of the assembly shown in FIG. 6; and

FIG. 9 is a fragment vertical view, similar to FIG. 1, of a portion of a human spine in which is installed a variant form of the novel vertebral disc endoprosthesis the variant form having a prosthetic longitudinal ligament;

FIG. 10 is a sectional view taken substantially in the plane of line 10-10 in FIG. 9;

FIG. 11 is a top view of a retainer means for use with a vertebral disc endoprosthesis;

FIG. 12 is a sectional view taken substantially in the plane of line 12-12 of FIG. 11;

FIG. 13 is a side view of a vertebral disc endoprosthesis having a groove for receiving the retainer means; and

FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional view of the retainer means in use.

While the invention will be described in connection with a preferred embodiment and procedure, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to this embodiment or procedure. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Turning more specifically to FIGS. 1-3, a portion of a human spine 10 is shown. The illustrated spine 10 has been subjected to a discectomy surgical process. To discourage degeneration of or damage to the natural vertebral bodies 12 and 14 and their respective facet joints, in accordance with the invention, a vertebral disc endoprosthesis 18 is affixed between the adjacent natural vertebral bodies 12 and 14. Here this vertebral disc endoprosthesis 18 comprises a resilient disc body 20 having a relatively stiff annular gasket exterior portion 22 and a relatively supple nuclear central portion 24. The annular gasket 22 can be formed from a suitable biocompatible elastomer of approximately 90 durometer hardness and the nuclear central portion 24 can be formed from a softer biocompatible elastomeric polymer of approximately 30 durometer hardness.

Concaval-convex means 30 surround the resilient body 20 to retain the resilient body 20 between the adjacent natural vertebral bodies 12, 14 in a patient's spine 10. To this end, as shown in FIG. 3, the concaval-convex means 30 comprise two generally L-shaped supports 32 and 34. The supports 32, 34 each have confronting first concaval-convex legs 42, 44, each leg being of relatively constant cross-sectional thickness. Each leg 42, 44 has an outer convex surface 52, 54 for engaging the adjacent bone of the natural vertebral bodies 12, 14. Corresponding inner concave surfaces 62, 64 in confronting array retain the resilient body 20 in its illustrated compressive force shock-absorbing position. These supports 32 and 34 can undergo principle movement away from one another, but only limited secondary translational, rotational and distractional motion will occur. Each support 32, 34 has a second wing or leg 72, 74 extending generally perpendicularly to the first legs 42, 44 respectively, and adapted for affixation to the adjacent bone structure. To carry out aspects of the invention described below, this affixation is effectively accomplished by cannulated screw devices 82, 84 which may be of a biodegradable type manufactured by Zimmer of Largo, Fla. Each device 82, 84 comprises a screw 92, 94; and a screw anchor 102, 104 adapted to threadably receive the screw extends radially into and seats within the bone structure 12, 14 as especially shown in FIG. 3.

To discourage and prohibit migration of fluids between the endoprosthesis 18 and adjacent parts of the anatomy, a seal member 110 is attached to the supports 32, 34 so as to surround the resilient body 20 comprised of the gasket 22 and nucleus 24, in accordance with another aspect of the invention. Here, this seal member 110 comprises a flexible sheet material having a multiplicity of pores. Preferably, the pores are from about 5 microns to about 60 microns in size. A flexible, strong polymer sheet material from which this seal is formed can be a Kevlar-like material, or it can be Goretex-like material, or other appropriate biocompatible material, such as polyether, polyurethane, or polycarbonate urethane membranes, can be used. Kevlar material is offered by the E. I. DuPont de Nemours Company of Wilmington, Delaware and Goretex material is offered by the W. T. Gore Company of Flagstaff and Phoenix, Arizona. Known sealing material can be applied to the flexible sheet material so as to render the flexible sheet material substantially impervious to the passage of any fluid. A watertight seal is perfected when the seal 110 is glued or otherwise affixed to the legs 42, 44 and mediate portions of the legs 72, 74 as suggested in FIGS. 1-3.

In an alternative embodiment, the watertight seal between the endoprosthesis 18 and adjacent parts of the anatomy can be provided by developing a groove 402 completely encircling the periphery of each of the legs 42, 44. Only one of the grooves is shown in FIG. 13. In this embodiment, the seal member 410 is provided with a beaded edge 412 for each groove. Additionally, a retaining band 415 is provided for each groove to retain the seal member 410 in grooves 402. The retaining bands 415 can be in the form of a biocompatible monofilament wire of, for example, stainless steel or titanium, a synthetic polymer cable or a braided wire cable. As shown in FIG. 11, each retaining band is crimped anteriorly by a crimping sleeve 420. Of course, more than one crimping sleeve may be used, if necessary. Although one sealing arrangement consisting of the groove, beaded edge and retaining band is shown in FIG. 14, it should be understood that the sealing arrangement on the concaval-convex leg of the other support is identical in design and function.

In use, the seal member 410 is placed about the concaval-convex means 30. The retaining bands 415 are then placed adjacent to the respective groove 402 and crimped anteriorly, thereby fitting the bands into the grooves. Each beaded edge 412 prevents the slipping of the seal member underneath the retaining band. Thus, the retaining band, the groove and the beaded edge all cooperate to provide a water-tight seal to prevent the migration of fluids between the endoprosthesis 18 and adjacent parts of the anatomy. Glue can also be used to affix the seal member to the concaval-convex means 30 as a supplemental means for perfecting the seal.

In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the supports 32, 34 are formed of a biocompatible metal which may contain chromium cobalt or titanium. Surface roughening or titanium beading 112, 114 on the exterior surfaces 52, 54 of legs 42, 44 encourages positive bonding between the adjacent bone and the convex surfaces 52, 54.

As suggested in FIGS. 9 and 10, a prosthetic longitudinal ligament 250 can be connected between the screws 92, 94 to limit motions between elements of the spine 10 in the area where the endoprosthesis 18 is implanted. This strap 250 may be made of the Kevlar-like material or the Goretex-like material described above, or it may be made of any other strong biocompatible material.

In accordance with another aspect of the invention, multiple endoprosthetic disc units can be placed in series with a straddling interlock appendage providing stability and fixation as shown in FIG. 5. Entire portions of a patient's spine can be replaced by a series of interconnected endoprosthetic vertebral bodies and endoprosthetic disc units. FIGS. 6-8 show an upper natural vertebral body unit 312 to which an upper endoprosthetic body 308 has been attached. A lower natural vertebral body 314 has attached, at its upper end, an endoprosthetic disc unit 318. Between these endoprosthetic disc units 308 and 318 is an endoprosthetic vertebral body 320. As suggested by FIG. 7, the endoprosthetic vertebral body 320 need not be irregularly shaped in cross sectional aspect; rather, manufacturing processes may suggest that it have a circular cross-sectional shape. As show in FIGS. 6 and 8, this endoprosthetic vertebral body 320 comprises a titanium element 321, to which are attached the preformed upper and lower endoprosthetic vertebral body upper and lower concaval-convex elements 322, 324. Each concaval-convex element 322, 324 is attached to the prosthetic vertebral body 320, as shown in FIG. 7, by extending set screws 330 through the titanium vertebral body 321 into a stem-like projection 331 extending from each of the concaval-convex elements 322, 324. A hole 360 in the body 320 accommodates the stem-like projections 331 of the concaval-convex elements 322 and 324. The stem-like projection 331 of the concaval-convex elements 322 and 324 is used only in conjunction with a prosthetic vertebral body implant construction 320.

An ear 340 is affixed, as by weldments 341, to a leg 342 extending from a concaval-convex element 322 as illustrated in FIGS. 6 and 8. An anchor 352 can be threaded into the endoprosthetic vertebral body 320, and a screw 362 can be turned into the anchor 352 so as to rigidly assemble the leg 342 to a leg 354 extending from the lower endoprosthetic disc unit 318.

The upper disc endoprosthesis 308, the endoprosthetic vertebral body 320, and the lower disc endoprosthesis 318 can all be assembled and interconnected as a unit before implantation in a patient's body when indicated.

As also suggested in FIG. 6, the annular corners 372, 374 of natural vertebral bodies 312, 314 each can extend irregularly radially outwardly of the adjacent disc endoprosthesis 308, 318. However, the comers 382B, 384B of the prosthetic vertebral body 320 do not generally extend significantly outside those disc units 308, 318, thus discouraging vertebral body engagement with and consequent abrasion or other damage to adjacent portions of the patient's natural anatomy. Preferably the endoprosthetic vertebral body 320 is not exactly right cylindrical in shape, but is rather slightly biconical; that is, the endoprosthetic vertebral body 320 has a waist 390 of minimum radius R at an axial medial point as suggested in FIG. 6.

According to yet another aspect of the invention, novel surgical procedures permit effective and permanent installation of the endoprosthetic vertebral body 320 and associated parts. First, a surgeon or medical technician develops information about the size, shape and nature of a patient's damaged vertebral body or bodies from radiographs, CT and/or MRI scans, noting specifically the anterior-posterior and lateral dimensions of the end plate of each involved vertebral body and the vertical height of the anterior aspect of each involved vertebral and/or proximate vertebral body and vertical height of the mid portion of involved and proximate relatively normal intervertebral disc spaces. This information is transmitted by telephone, computer datalink or documentary transport to a specialized laboratory. That laboratory constructs one or more prosthetic assemblies of the sort shown in FIG. 6 in conformity with the received information and this disclosure. Each of the assemblies can include a prosthetic vertebral body 321, and at each body end is a prosthetic disc 308,318. Each prosthetic disc unit comprises, in turn, the concaval-convex elements 30; the resilient body 20 interposed between the concaval-convex elements; and the seal unit 110 secured around the interior legs and resilient body. Thereafter, the completed and conformed assembly is implanted in the patient's spine 10.

When the unit or units have been received and the patient properly prepared, the damaged natural spinal disc or discs and vertebral body or bodies are removed and the adjacent spinal bone surfaces are milled or otherwise formed to provide concave surfaces to receive the confronting convex surfaces 52, 54. Thereafter, the disc units and vertebral body are installed in the patient's spine.

To accurately locate the concaval-convex surfaces in the patient's spine, holes 382A, 384A (FIG. 3) are precisely located and then formed in the bone structure using a measuring instrument centered in the evacuated natural intravertebral disc space. These holes are then tapped to form female threads therein. When the threads have been formed, the anchors 102, 104 are implanted in the respective tapped holes, thereby creating reference points located precisely with respect to the patient's spine. After the holes have been formed and the anchors 102, 104 implanted, a bone surface milling jig (not shown) is affixed to the anchors 102, 104 and the desired concave surfaces of predetermined shape are formed on the inferior and superior surfaces of the opposing vertebral bodies using one of a selection of predetermined milling head or bit sizes. Thereafter, the bone milling jig is removed and the concaval-convex elements 52, 54 identical in shape to the milled surfaces 112, 114 are inserted between the distracted milled vertebral bodies 12, 14. The distraction device is then moved. The concaval-convex convex structures are then attached by the same anchors 102, 104 to the bone, thus insuring a precise and stable mate between the bone surfaces and the convex surfaces 52, 54.

If necessary, a damaged implanted nucleus and/or gasket 24 can be removed and replaced. This can be accomplished by slitting the seal 110; removing the annular gasket 24 and damaged nucleus 22, and replacing them with new, undamaged elements. Thereafter, the seal 110 can be re-established by suturing or gluing closed the slit seal.

Kunzler, Alex, Bryan, Vincent

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
2677369,
3486505,
3867728,
3875595,
4023572, Aug 06 1974 Milling tool for preparing a joint socket in the prosthetic replacement of a joint
4116200, Oct 01 1975 Aesculap-Werke Aktiengesellschaft vormals Jetter & Scheerer Milling tool for surgical purposes
4179810, Mar 31 1977 Device for milling slots in a jawbone for mounting an endossal device
4309777, Nov 13 1980 Artificial intervertebral disc
4349921, Jun 16 1980 Intervertebral disc prosthesis
4599086, Jun 07 1985 Spine stabilization device and method
4645507, Sep 02 1982 WALDEMAR LINK GMBH & CO Prosthesis
4714469, Feb 26 1987 PFIZER HOSPITAL PRODUCTS GROUP, INC Spinal implant
4743256, Oct 04 1985 DEPUY ACROMED, INC Surgical prosthetic implant facilitating vertebral interbody fusion and method
4757983, Feb 26 1985 HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP Head and chin for face-down operations
4759766, Sep 04 1984 WALDEMAR LINK GMBH & CO Intervertebral disc endoprosthesis
4759769, Feb 12 1987 Health & Research Services Inc. Artificial spinal disc
4766328, May 26 1987 FAIRCHILD TAIWAN CORPORATION Programmable pulse generator
4777942, Oct 02 1986 SULZER BROTHERS LIMITED, A CORP OF SWITZERLAND Bone milling instrument
4800639, Feb 07 1985 Sulzer Brothers Limited Method of making a metal bone implant
4834757, Oct 04 1985 DEPUY ACROMED, INC Prosthetic implant
4863476, Aug 29 1986 ZIMMER TECHNOLOGY, INC Spinal implant
4863477, May 12 1987 Synthetic intervertebral disc prosthesis
4874389, Dec 07 1987 COLLINS, EILEEN E , BENEFICIARY Replacement disc
4878915, Oct 04 1985 DEPUY ACROMED, INC Surgical prosthetic implant facilitating vertebral interbody fusion
4887595, Jul 29 1987 DEPUY ACROMED, INC Surgically implantable device for spinal columns
4904260, Aug 20 1987 RAYMEDICA, LLC Prosthetic disc containing therapeutic material
4904261, Aug 06 1987 Surgicraft Limited Spinal implants
4908032, Mar 09 1987 Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. Reconstruction prosthesis
4908036, Jun 15 1987 Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. Endoprosthesis
4911718, Jun 10 1988 UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY, THE Functional and biocompatible intervertebral disc spacer
4917704, Jul 09 1987 Zimmer GmbH Intervertebral prosthesis
4932969, Jan 08 1987 Zimmer GmbH Joint endoprosthesis
4932975, Oct 16 1989 Vanderbilt University Vertebral prosthesis
4936848, Sep 22 1989 ZIMMER SPINE, INC Implant for vertebrae
4946378, Nov 24 1987 ASAHI KOGAKU KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA, A CORP OF JAPAN Artificial intervertebral disc
4955908, Jul 09 1987 Zimmer GmbH Metallic intervertebral prosthesis
4978355, Jan 25 1985 Sulzer Brothers Limited Plastic bone implant having a reinforced contact surface
4997432, Mar 23 1988 Waldemar Link GmbH & Co Surgical instrument set
5002576, Jun 06 1988 GERHARD, FUHRMANN; ULRICH GROSS; KADEN, BERTRAM; KRANZ, CURT; SCHMITZ, HERMAN-JOSEF; FRITZ, THOMAS Intervertebral disk endoprosthesis
5015247, Jun 13 1988 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc Threaded spinal implant
5035716, Dec 07 1987 COLLINS, EILEEN E , BENEFICIARY Replacement disc
5047055, Dec 21 1990 HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP Hydrogel intervertebral disc nucleus
5059193, Nov 20 1989 ZIMMER SPINE, INC Expandable spinal implant and surgical method
5059194, Feb 12 1990 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc Cervical distractor
5062845, May 10 1989 ZIMMER SPINE, INC Method of making an intervertebral reamer
5071437, Feb 15 1989 DEPUY ACROMED, INC Artificial disc
5080662, Nov 27 1989 Spinal stereotaxic device and method
5084048, Jul 12 1989 Zimmer GmbH Implant for vertebrae with spinal stabilizer
5108438, Jul 20 1987 ReGen Corporation Prosthetic intervertebral disc
5122130, Mar 23 1988 Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. Forceps for inserting intervertebral device
5123926, Feb 22 1991 Perumala Corporation Artificial spinal prosthesis
5171280, Apr 20 1990 Zimmer GmbH Intervertebral prosthesis
5171281, Aug 18 1988 UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY, THE Functional and biocompatible intervertebral disc spacer containing elastomeric material of varying hardness
5176708, Mar 12 1990 SULZER BROTHERS LIMITED, A CORP OF SWITZERLAND Prosthetic implant
5192326, Dec 21 1990 HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP Hydrogel bead intervertebral disc nucleus
5192327, Mar 22 1991 DEPUY ACROMED, INC Surgical prosthetic implant for vertebrae
5234431, Apr 03 1991 Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. Bone plate arrangement
5236460, Feb 12 1990 MIDAS REX, L P Vertebral body prosthesis
5246458, Oct 07 1992 Artificial disk
5258031, Jan 06 1992 SDGI Holdings, Inc Intervertebral disk arthroplasty
5261911, Jun 18 1991 Anterolateral spinal fixation system
5261913, Jul 26 1989 Aesculap AG Device for straightening, securing, compressing and elongating the spinal column
5306308, Oct 23 1989 Intervertebral implant
5314477, Mar 07 1990 SPINE SOLUTIONS, INC Prosthesis for intervertebral discs and instruments for implanting it
5314478, Mar 29 1991 KYOCERA CORPORATION, A CORP OF DE ; KABUSHIKI KAISHA BIOMATERIAL UNIVERSE, A CORP OF JAPAN Artificial bone connection prosthesis
5320644, Aug 30 1991 Zimmer GmbH Intervertebral disk prosthesis
5370697, Apr 21 1992 Sulzer Medizinaltechnik AG Artificial intervertebral disk member
5383933, Dec 02 1991 Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. Endoprosthesis
5401269, Mar 13 1992 Waldemar Link GmbH & Co Intervertebral disc endoprosthesis
5403314, Feb 05 1993 DEPUY ACROMED, INC Apparatus for retaining spinal elements in a desired spatial relationship
5425772, Sep 20 1993 DEPUY ACROMED, INC Prosthetic implant for intervertebral spinal fusion
5425773, Apr 05 1994 SDGI Holdings, Inc Intervertebral disk arthroplasty device
5443514, Oct 01 1993 DEPUY ACROMED, INC Method for using spinal implants
5456719, Sep 19 1991 Waldemar Link GmbH & Co Endoprosthesis with a prosthesis part made of viscoelastic synthetic resin
5458638, Jul 06 1989 ZIMMER SPINE, INC Non-threaded spinal implant
5458642, Jan 18 1994 Synthetic intervertebral disc
5484437, Jun 13 1988 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants
5489307, Feb 10 1993 ZIMMER SPINE, INC Spinal stabilization surgical method
5489308, Jul 06 1989 ZIMMER SPINE, INC Spinal implant
5496318, Jan 08 1993 ENCORE MEDICAL, L P ; ENCORE MEDICAL IHC, INC ; Encore Medical Asset Corporation Interspinous segmental spine fixation device
5507816, Dec 04 1991 Synthes USA, LLC Spinal vertebrae implants
5514180, Jan 14 1994 Prosthetic intervertebral devices
5527315, Apr 21 1994 Aesculap AG Spinal osteosynthesis rod with three branches
5534028, Apr 20 1993 HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP Hydrogel intervertebral disc nucleus with diminished lateral bulging
5534029, Dec 14 1992 Yumiko, Shima Articulated vertebral body spacer
5534030, Feb 09 1993 DEPUY ACROMED, INC Spine disc
5545229, Aug 18 1988 UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY, THE Functional and biocompatible intervertebral disc spacer containing elastomeric material of varying hardness
5549679, May 20 1994 SPINEOLOGY, INC Expandable fabric implant for stabilizing the spinal motion segment
5556431, Mar 13 1992 Waldemar Link GmbH & Co Intervertebral disc endoprosthesis
5562738, Apr 05 1994 SDGI Holdings, Inc Intervertebral disk arthroplasty device
5571189, May 20 1994 SPINEOLOGY, INC Expandable fabric implant for stabilizing the spinal motion segment
5593409, Jun 03 1988 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc Interbody spinal fusion implants
5609636, May 23 1994 ZIMMER SPINE, INC Spinal implant
5645598, Jan 16 1996 HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP Spinal fusion device with porous material
5649926, Jul 14 1994 Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc. Spinal segmental reduction derotational fixation system
5658285, Oct 28 1994 Aesculap AG Rehabitable connecting-screw device for a bone joint, intended in particular for stabilizing at least two vertebrae
5662158, Feb 18 1994 Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. Self-lubricating implantable articulation member
5674294, Sep 14 1993 COMMISSARIAT A L ENERGIE ATOMIQUE; UNIVERSITE PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE PARIS VI Intervertebral disk prosthesis
5674295, Oct 17 1994 RAYMEDICA, LLC Prosthetic spinal disc nucleus
5674296, Nov 14 1994 MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INC Human spinal disc prosthesis
5676701, Jan 14 1993 HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP Low wear artificial spinal disc
5683464, May 04 1992 Zimmer Dental, Inc Spinal disk implantation kit
5702450, Jun 28 1993 Intervertebral disk prosthesis
5713899, Apr 27 1995 Aesculap AG Cervical cage designed for the performance of intersomatic arthrodesis
5716415, Oct 01 1993 DEPUY ACROMED, INC Spinal implant
5720748, Feb 10 1993 ZIMMER SPINE, INC Spinal stabilization surgical apparatus
5722977, Jan 24 1996 DANEK MEDICAL, INC Method and means for anterior lumbar exact cut with quadrilateral osteotome and precision guide/spacer
5723013, Feb 06 1995 JBS S A Spacer implant for substituting missing vertebrae
5741253, Jun 13 1988 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc Method for inserting spinal implants
5782830, Feb 20 1996 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc Implant insertion device
5782832, Oct 01 1996 HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP Spinal fusion implant and method of insertion thereof
5797909, Jun 13 1988 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc Apparatus for inserting spinal implants
5824093, Oct 17 1994 RAYMEDICA, LLC Prosthetic spinal disc nucleus
5824094, Oct 17 1997 TLIF, LLC Spinal disc
5865846, Nov 14 1994 Human spinal disc prosthesis
5865848, Sep 12 1997 Artifex, Ltd.; BHC Engineering, L.P. Dynamic intervertebral spacer and method of use
5885300, Apr 01 1996 Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Guide apparatus of intervertebral implant
5888197, Jul 01 1997 THOMPSON SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC Cam-operated universal latch joint apparatus
5888226, Nov 12 1997 Intervertebral prosthetic disc
5897087, Mar 15 1994 THOMPSON SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC CAM tightened universal joint clamp
5902233, Dec 13 1996 THOMPSON SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC Angling surgical retractor apparatus and method of retracting anatomy
5928284, Jul 09 1998 Disc replacement prosthesis
5947971, Feb 10 1993 ZIMMER SPINE, INC Spinal stabilization surgical apparatus
5976187, Jan 21 1997 Spinal Innovations, LLC Fusion implant
5984865, Sep 15 1998 THOMPSON SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC Surgical retractor having locking interchangeable blades
5989291, Feb 26 1998 HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP; HOWMEDICA OTEONICS CORP Intervertebral spacer device
6001130, Nov 14 1994 MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INC Human spinal disc prosthesis with hinges
6017008, Mar 15 1994 Thompson Surgical Instruments, Inc. Cam tightened universal joint clamp
6022376, Jun 06 1997 RAYMEDICA, LLC Percutaneous prosthetic spinal disc nucleus and method of manufacture
6033363, Jan 26 1999 Thompson Surgical Instruments Insulating sleeve for a table mounted retractor
6059790, Aug 29 1997 ZIMMER SPINE, INC Apparatus and method for spinal stabilization
6059829, Mar 08 1995 Synthes USA, LLC Intervertebral implant
6063121, Jul 29 1998 Vertebral body prosthesis
6066174, Oct 16 1995 SDGI Holdings, Inc Implant insertion device
6080155, Jun 13 1988 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc Method of inserting and preloading spinal implants
6083228, Jun 09 1998 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc Device and method for preparing a space between adjacent vertebrae to receive an insert
6086595, Aug 29 1997 ZIMMER SPINE, INC Apparatus and method for spinal stabilization
6096038, Jun 10 1991 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc Apparatus for inserting spinal implants
6139579, Oct 31 1997 DEPUY ACROMED, INC Spinal disc
6156067, Nov 14 1994 MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INC Human spinal disc prosthesis
6162252, Dec 12 1997 DEPUY ACROMED, INC Artificial spinal disc
6179874, Apr 23 1998 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc Articulating spinal implant
6228022, Oct 28 1998 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc Methods and instruments for spinal surgery
6228026, Jan 23 1998 Rultract, Inc. Surgical support apparatus with splined coupling, cross bar support and head-to-toe extension for surgical retractor apparatus
6231609, Jul 09 1998 Disc replacement prosthesis
DE2263842,
DE2804936,
DE3023353,
DE3741493,
DE90000943,
EP560140,
EP176728,
SU1560184,
SU895433,
WO4839,
WO4851,
WO13619,
WO13620,
/////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Feb 02 2001Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Oct 11 2002Spinal Dynamics CorporationMEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INC MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME0136690543 pdf
Jan 28 2005MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INC SDGI Holdings, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0156350232 pdf
Apr 28 2006SDGI Holdings, IncWarsaw Orthopedic, IncMERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0190640771 pdf
Apr 28 2006SOFAMOR DANEK HOLDINGS, INC Warsaw Orthopedic, IncMERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0190640771 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jan 10 2003ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Jul 26 20144 years fee payment window open
Jan 26 20156 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jul 26 2015patent expiry (for year 4)
Jul 26 20172 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Jul 26 20188 years fee payment window open
Jan 26 20196 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jul 26 2019patent expiry (for year 8)
Jul 26 20212 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Jul 26 202212 years fee payment window open
Jan 26 20236 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jul 26 2023patent expiry (for year 12)
Jul 26 20252 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)