An apparatus, suited, for example, for extreme ultraviolet lithography, includes a radiation source and a processing organ for processing the radiation from the radiation source. Between the radiation source and the processing organ a filter is placed which, in the radial direction from the radiation source, comprises a plurality of foils or plates.

PTO Wrapper PDF
Dossier Espace Google
Patent
   RE43036
Priority
Feb 19 1999
Filed
Mar 18 2004
Issued
Dec 20 2011
Expiry
Feb 19 2019
Inventors
Sjmaenok, …
Assg.orig
ASML Nethe…
Assg.curr
ASML Nethe…
Entity
Large
Referenced by
1
References
41
Maint.:
EXPIRED
CROSS-REFERENCE TO R…
0. 13. A filter to suppress undesired atomic and microscopic particles from a radiation source, the filter comprising a plurality of foils or plates having a surface configured to trap atomic and microscopic particles thereon, wherein each foil or plate essentially extends away from the radiation source.
0. 52. A radiation source system, comprising:
an extreme ultraviolet radiation plasma source; and
a filter to suppress undesired atomic and microscopic particles comprising a plurality of foils or plates having a surface configured to trap thereon atomic and microscopic particles from the plasma source, wherein each foil or plate essentially extends away from the plasma source.
0. 31. A lithographic apparatus, comprising:
a filter comprising a plurality of foils or plates having a surface configured to trap thereon atomic and microscopic particles from a radiation source, wherein each foil or plate essentially extends away from the radiation source; and
at least one optical element configured to receive radiation from the radiation source via the filter.
0. 1. An apparatus comprising a radiation source and a processing organ for processing radiation from the radiation source, wherein a filter for suppressing undesired atomic and microscopic particles is placed between the radiation source and the processing organ, which filter comprises a plurality of foils or plates having surfaces for trapping atomic and microscopic particles thereon, wherein each foil or plate essentially points in a radial direction when viewed from the radiation source.
0. 2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the foils or plates are positioned in a honeycomb construction.
0. 3. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the foils or plates are coneshaped and are positioned concentrically.
0. 4. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein in the radial direction the foils or plates are positioned such as to be evenly distributed in relation to one another.
0. 5. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the radiation source and the processing organ are placed in a buffer gas, and wherein a distance between the radiation source and a proximal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source is selected subject to a pressure and a type of buffer gas.
0. 6. The apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the buffer gas is krypton, wherein the pressure is at least approximately 0.1 Torr, and wherein the distance between the radiation source and the proximal end of the filter is 5 cm.
0. 7. The apparatus according to claim 5, wherein a length of the filter, which is formed by the distance between the proximal end of the filter and its distal end in relation to the radiation source, is selected subject to the pressure of the buffer gas and a form of the filter.
0. 8. The apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the length of the filter is at least 1 cm.
0. 9. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the number of plates in the filter is adjusted subject to a thickness of each plate and a desired optical transparency of the filter as determined by the formula
d d + d f × 100 ⁢ %
in which d=a distance between two plates of the filter at a proximal side of the filter; and df=a thickness of a plate of the filter.
0. 10. The apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the number of plates is adjusted such that the distance between two plates is approximately 1 mm.
0. 11. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein a surface of the plates is rough.
0. 12. A filter for suppressing undesired atomic and microscopic particles which are emitted by a radiation source, wherein a plurality of plates are positioned substantially parallel in relation to one another, for trapping atomic and microscopic particles on their respective surfaces, wherein the plates are directed radially from the radiation source.
0. 14. The filter according to claim 13, wherein each foil or plate extends essentially radially from the radiation source.
0. 15. The filter according to claim 14, wherein the foils or plates are cone shaped and are positioned concentrically.
0. 16. The filter according to claim 14, wherein a foil or plate of the plurality of foils or plates is positioned substantially orthogonally to another foil or plate of the plurality of foils or plates.
0. 17. The filter according to claim 14, wherein the foils or plates are positioned such as to be evenly distributed in relation to one another.
0. 18. The filter according to claim 13, wherein each foil or plate is positioned substantially parallel in relation to one another.
0. 19. The filter according to claim 13, wherein the foils or plates are positioned in a honeycomb construction.
0. 20. The filter according to claim 13, wherein the filter is to be disposed in a buffer gas, and wherein a distance between the radiation source and a proximal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source is selected subject to a pressure and a type of the buffer gas.
0. 21. The filter according to claim 20, wherein the buffer gas is krypton, wherein the pressure is at least approximately 0.1 Torr, and wherein the distance between the radiation source and the proximal end of the filter is 5 cm.
0. 22. The filter according to claim 13, wherein a length of the filter, which is the distance between a proximal end of the filter and a distal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source, is selected subject to a pressure of a buffer gas, in which the filter is to be disposed, and a form of the filter.
0. 23. The filter according to claim 22, wherein the length of the filter is at least 1 cm.
0. 24. The filter according to claim 13, wherein the number of foils or plates in the filter, a thickness of a foil or plate in the filter, a distance between two foils or plates in the filter or any combination thereof is based on a desired optical transparency of the filter as determined by the formula:
d d + d f × 100 ⁢ %
wherein d is a distance between two foils or plates of the filter at a proximal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source and df is a thickness of a foil or plate of the filter.
0. 25. The filter according to claim 24, wherein the distance between two foils or plates in the filter is approximately 1 mm.
0. 26. The filter according to claim 13, wherein a surface of the foil or plates is roughened to increase suppression of the undesired atomic and microscopic particles.
0. 27. The filter according to claim 13, wherein the filter is configured to allow transmission therethrough of extreme ultraviolet radiation.
0. 28. The filter according to claim 27, wherein the extreme ultraviolet radiation has a wavelength of about 13 nm.
0. 29. The filter according to claim 13, wherein the foils or plates comprise copper.
0. 30. The filter according to claim 13, wherein the filter has an optical transparency of at least about 80%.
0. 32. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein each foil or plate extends essentially radially from the radiation source.
0. 33. The apparatus according to claim 32, wherein the foils or plates are cone shaped and are positioned concentrically.
0. 34. The apparatus according to claim 32, wherein a foil or plate of the plurality of foils or plates is positioned substantially orthogonally to another foil or plate of the plurality of foils or plates.
0. 35. The apparatus according to claim 32, wherein the foils or plates are positioned such as to be evenly distributed in relation to one another.
0. 36. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein each foil or plate is positioned substantially parallel in relation to one another.
0. 37. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein the foils or plates are positioned in a honeycomb construction.
0. 38. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein the filter is disposed in a buffer gas, and wherein a distance between the radiation source and a proximal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source is selected subject to a pressure and a type of the buffer gas.
0. 39. The apparatus according to claim 38, wherein the buffer gas is krypton, wherein the pressure is at least approximately 0.1 Torr, and wherein the distance between the radiation source and the proximal end of the filter is 5 cm.
0. 40. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein a length of the filter, which is the distance between a proximal end of the filter and a distal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source, is selected subject to a pressure of a buffer gas, in which the filter is disposed, and a form of the filter.
0. 41. The apparatus according to claim 40, wherein the length of the filter is at least 1 cm.
0. 42. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein the number of foils or plates in the filter, a thickness of a foil or plate in the filter, a distance between two foils or plates in the filter or any combination thereof is based on a desired optical transparency of the filter as determined by the formula:
d d + d f × 100 ⁢ %
wherein d is a distance between two foils or plates of the filter at a proximal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source and df is a thickness of a foil or plate of the filter.
0. 43. The apparatus according to claim 42, wherein the distance between two foils or plates of the filter is approximately 1 mm.
0. 44. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein a surface of the foil or plates is roughened to increase suppression of the undesired atomic and microscopic particles.
0. 45. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein the radiation comprises extreme ultraviolet radiation.
0. 46. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein a wavelength of the radiation is about 13 nm.
0. 47. The apparatus according to claim 46, wherein the wavelength of the radiation is 13.5 nm.
0. 48. The apparatus according to claim 40, wherein the at least one optical element comprises a plurality of multi-layer mirrors.
0. 49. The apparatus according to claim 48, wherein at least one of the plurality of multi-layer mirrors comprises alternating molybdenum and silicon layers.
0. 50. The apparatus according to claim 31, comprising the radiation source, the radiation source comprising an extreme ultraviolet radiation plasma source.
0. 51. The apparatus according to claim 31, wherein the filter has an optical transparency of at least about 80%.
0. 53. The system according to claim 52, wherein each foil or plate extends essentially radially from the plasma source.
0. 54. The system according to claim 53, wherein the foils or plates are cone shaped and are positioned concentrically.
0. 55. The system according to claim 53, wherein a foil or plate of the plurality of foils or plates is positioned substantially orthogonally to another foil or plate of the plurality of foils or plates.
0. 56. The system according to claim 52, wherein a surface of the foil or plates is roughened to increase suppression of the undesired atomic and microscopic particles.
0. 57. The system according to claim 52, wherein a wavelength of the extreme ultraviolet radiation is about 13 nm.
0. 58. The system according to claim 57, wherein the wavelength of the radiation is 13.5 nm.
0. 59. The system according to claim 52, wherein the filter is positioned between the plasma source and a lithographic apparatus comprising one or more multilayer mirrors.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/NL99/00090 filed Feb. 19, 1999.

andnot shown as PO. This processing organ is located at the side of the filter 2 facing away from the radiation source 1. The filter 2 comprises a number of plates 3 positioned in a radial direction from the radiation source 1. It is possible to position said plates in a honeycomb construction, or as a plurality of concentric cones as shown in FIG. 3.

FIGS. 1 and 2 show that in the direction of radiation from the source 1, the plates are positioned such as to be evenly distributed next to one another. The proximal end 4 of the filter 2 is at a distance X from the radiation source 1, which distance is selected depending on the pressure and the type of buffer gas in which the radiation source 1, the processing organ (not shown), and also the filter 2, are placed. If the apparatus is used for extreme ultraviolet lithography, the buffer gas is preferably krypton having a pressure of 0.5 Torr, and the value of X may be 5 cm. The length of the plates of the filter is indicated by L. The value of L is selected depending on the pressure of the buffer gas and the form of the filter 2. The value of L, that is to say the length of the filter, is at least 1 cm. In FIG. 1, this value is approximately 10 cm. The thickness of the plates 3 may be, for example, 0.1 mm, and the spacing between the plates at the side nearest the radiation source 1, may be approximately 1 mm. This may result in an optical transparency of the filter 2, which is determined by the formula

d d + d f × 100 ⁢ %
in which d=the distance between two plates of the filter at the proximal side of the filter; and df=the thickness of a plate of the filter.

The effectiveness of the filter can be promoted if the surface of the plates 3 is slightly roughened.

When the apparatus is used for extreme ultraviolet lithography, radiation is used having a wavelength of 13.5 nanometers. Various inert gasses may be used as buffer gas, such as helium and krypton which, compared with other gasses have the lowest absorption coefficient at this wavelength. Krypton is better able to meet the requirements of the present application because the atomic mass of krypton is more compatible with that of the atomic- and microparticles emitted by the radiation source, which augments the inhibition of said undesirable particles. The krypton gas used is maintained at a pressure of at least several mTorr. It should be noted that taken over a distance of 20 cm at a pressure of 0.5 Torr, the optical transparency of krypton for the desired radiation is approximately 90%. The filter used in the apparatus is comprised of copper plates (other materials are also possible) which have a length of 7 cm and are positioned at 2 cm from the radiation source. At a plate thickness of 0.2 mm and with the plates being spaced at approximately 0.8 mm at the side of the radiation source, the filter will have a geometrical transparency of approximately 80%. The effectiveness of the filter was measured at room temperature and at a temperature of approximately −90° C. At both these temperatures the effectiveness of the filter was shown to be very high, almost 100.

It will be clear to the person skilled in the art that the various dimensions of the filter forming part of the apparatus according to the invention, as well as the distance from the filter to the radiation source, has to be determined in practice on the basis of the above-mentioned inter-relating ratios. It is therefore possible to apply diverse variations to the above description, without departing from the idea of the invention as specified in the appended claims.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes could be made to the embodiments described above without departing from the broad inventive concept thereof. It is understood, therefore, that this invention is not limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but it is intended to cover modifications within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.

INVENTORS:

Sjmaenok, Leonid Aizikovitch

THIS PATENT IS REFERENCED BY THESE PATENTS:
Patent Priority Assignee Title
10082473, Jul 07 2015 General Electric Company X-ray filtration
THIS PATENT REFERENCES THESE PATENTS:
Patent Priority Assignee Title
1865441,
3418467,
4242588, Aug 13 1979 UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY X-ray lithography system having collimating optics
4340818, May 14 1980 UAB RESEARCH FOUNDATION, THE, NON-PROFIT CORP Scanning grid apparatus for suppressing scatter in radiographic imaging
4408338, Dec 31 1981 International Business Machines Corporation Pulsed electromagnetic radiation source having a barrier for discharged debris
4672648, Oct 25 1985 Picker International, Inc.; PICKER INTERNATIONAL, INC Apparatus and method for radiation attenuation
4741012, Jan 29 1985 B V OPTISCHE INDUSTRIE DE OUDE DELFT Apparatus for slit radiography
4825454, Dec 28 1987 AMERICAN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, INC Tomographic imaging with concentric conical collimator
4837794, Oct 12 1984 MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC , A CORP OF DE Filter apparatus for use with an x-ray source
5099134, May 27 1988 Kabushiki Kasiha Toshiba Collimator and a method of producing a collimator for a scintillator
5265144, Jan 19 1991 Morpho Detection, Inc X-ray apparatus
5550678, Mar 14 1994 Siemens Medical Systems, Inc Focussing collimator of the Platz-Heinzelmann type and method of making Platz-Heinzelmann type collimators
5570408, Feb 28 1995 X-RAY OPTICAL SYSTEMS, INC High intensity, small diameter x-ray beam, capillary optic system
5768339, Oct 13 1995 Collimator for x-ray spectroscopy
6275568, Dec 22 1998 U S PHILIPS CORPORATION X-ray examination apparatus
6838684, Aug 23 2002 ASML NETHERLANDS B V Lithographic projection apparatus and particle barrier for use therein
7034308, Jun 27 2003 ASML NETHERLANDS B V Radiation system, contamination barrier, lithographic apparatus, device manufacturing method and device manufactured thereby
7057190, Aug 23 2002 ASML Netherlands B.V. Lithographic projection apparatus, particle barrier for use therein, integrated structure manufacturing method, and device manufactured thereby
7106832, Jan 10 2005 ASML NETHERLANDS B V Apparatus including a radiation source, a filter system for filtering particles out of radiation emitted by the source, and a processing system for processing the radiation, a lithographic apparatus including such an apparatus, and a method of filtering particles out of radiation emitting and propagating from a radiation source
7145132, Dec 27 2004 ASML NETHERLANDS B V Lithographic apparatus, illumination system and debris trapping system
20060139604,
20060169929,
20060186353,
20060219958,
20060261290,
20070018118,
20070023706,
EP682125,
EP7180042,
EP1274287,
GB2083969,
JP200098098,
JP200157298,
JP7180042,
JP8321395,
JP9237695,
JP9245992,
JP9320792,
WO137309,
WO9610324,
WO9942904,
ASSIGNMENT RECORDS    Assignment records on the USPTO
/
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Mar 18 2004ASML Netherlands B.V.(assignment on the face of the patent)
MAINTENANCE FEES AND DATES:    Maintenance records on the USPTO
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Feb 24 2012ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Dec 20 20144 years fee payment window open
Jun 20 20156 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 20 2015patent expiry (for year 4)
Dec 20 20172 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Dec 20 20188 years fee payment window open
Jun 20 20196 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 20 2019patent expiry (for year 8)
Dec 20 20212 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Dec 20 202212 years fee payment window open
Jun 20 20236 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 20 2023patent expiry (for year 12)
Dec 20 20252 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)