A communications system network that enables secondary use of spectrum on a non-interference basis is disclosed. Each secondary transceiver measures the background spectrum. The system uses a modulation method to measure the background signals that eliminates self-generated interference and also identifies the secondary signal to all primary users via on/off amplitude modulation, allowing easy resolution of interference claims. The system uses high-processing gain probe waveforms that enable propagation measurements to be made with minimal interference to the primary users. The system measures background signals and identifies the types of nearby receivers and modifies the local frequency assignments to minimize interference caused by a secondary system due to non-linear mixing interference and interference caused by out-of-band transmitted signals (phase noise, harmonics, and spurs). The system infers a secondary node's elevation and mobility (thus, its probability to cause interference) by analysis of the amplitude of background signals. Elevated or mobile nodes are given more conservative frequency assignments that stationary nodes.
|
0. 19. A method for a plurality of transceivers to communicate using at least one channel in the broadcast television frequency bands, the method comprising:
each transceiver measuring background TV signal strength;
determining whether the measured TV signal strength is greater than a first level and less than a second level, the second level being higher than the first level; and
if the measured TV signal strength is greater than the first level and less than the second level, using a waveform with energy above a start frequency of the at least one channel.
7. A method for a network of secondary communication devices to share the analog TV spectrum consisting of the steps of,
each secondary transceivers and secondary base stations measuring the strength of the background TV signal strength, and
if the primary TV signal strength is greater than a certain level above the noise level but less than another higher level, then
the secondary system will use a waveform with energy between 1.5 MHz above the channel start frequency and 4.5 MHz above the channel start frequency to avoid interference caused by the analog video and sound carriers.
0. 16. A method for a network of secondary communication devices to share the analog TV spectrum, the method comprising:
each secondary transceiver and secondary base station measuring the strength of the background TV signal strength, and
if the primary TV signal strength is greater than a certain level above the noise level but less than another higher level, then
using, by the secondary system, a waveform with energy between 1.5 MHz above the channel start frequency and 4.5 MHz above the channel start frequency to avoid interference caused by the analog video and sound carriers.
0. 29. A device comprising:
a communication module configured to measure background TV signal strength in at least one channel; and
a processor configured to:
determine whether the measured TV signal strength is greater than a first level and less than a second level, the second level being higher than the first level; and
if the measured TV signal strength is greater than the first level and less than the second level, configure the communication module to use a waveform with energy above a start frequency of the at least one channel to communicate with a plurality of transceivers.
0. 24. A system comprising a plurality of transceivers, each transceiver configured to measure background TV signal strength in at least one channel; said system configured to:
determine whether the measured TV signal strength is greater than a first level and less than a second level, the second level being higher than the first level; and
if the measured TV signal strength is greater than the first level and less than the second level, configure the system to use a waveform with energy above a start frequency of the at least one channel to communicate among the plurality of transceivers.
0. 21. A method for a plurality of cooperative transceivers and a central controller to communicate using a radio frequency channel, the method comprising:
providing a means for a non-cooperative node to identify the non-cooperative node's location and the channel on which interference is received;
identifying a first cooperative node and associated likely frequency being transmitted that might cause the interference;
commanding the identified first node to transmit data;
sequentially reducing the power of the identified first node until the non-cooperative node reports that the interference is decreased; and
if the interference to the non-cooperative node continues, repeating the previous step until a node causing the interference is located.
0. 32. A device comprising:
a communication module configured to communicate with a plurality of cooperative transceivers;
a processor configured to:
provide a means for a non-cooperative node to identify the non-cooperative node's location and a channel on which interference is received;
identify a first of the plurality of cooperative transceivers and an associated likely frequency being transmitted that might cause the interference; and
command the identified first cooperative transceiver to transmit data at sequentially reduced power until the non-cooperative node reports that the interference is decreased and, if the interference to the non-cooperative node continues, sequentially reduce the power of the commanded transmission until a node causing the interference is located.
0. 13. A method for a network of secondary communication devices comprising of transceivers, base stations and a central controller sharing a radio frequency channel with existing primary users with minimal interference to the primary users, the method comprising the steps of: each secondary transceiver and secondary base station measuring the primary signal level in the channel,
each secondary transceiver communicating the signal level to the central controller,
the central controller determining which channels each node may potentially use by comparing the primary signal level to a threshold value,
wherein each secondary transceiver and secondary base station transmits and receives data for a certain time period, then simultaneously halts transmissions, makes measurements of the background signals for a time period, and then either transmits or receives probe signals.
4. A method for a network of secondary communication devices consisting of transceivers, base stations and a central controller sharing a radio frequency channel with existing primary users with minimal interference to the primary users comprising the steps of:
each secondary transceiver and secondary base station measuring the primary signal level in the channel,
each secondary transceiver communicating the signal level to the central controller,
the central controller determining which channels each node may potentially use by comparing the primary signal level to a threshold value,
wherein a modulation scheme where each secondary transceiver and secondary base station transmits and receives data for a certain time period, then simultaneously halts transmissions, making measurements of the background signals for a time period, and then either transmitting or receiving probe signals.
0. 26. A system comprising:
a plurality of cooperative transceivers; and
a central controller;
at least one of said cooperative transceivers or said central controller configured to provide a means for a non-cooperative node to identify the non-cooperative node's location and a channel on which interference is received;
said central controller further configured to:
identify a first of the plurality of cooperative transceivers and an associated likely frequency being transmitted that might cause the interference; and
command the identified first cooperative transceiver to transmit data;
said identified first cooperative node configured to sequentially reduce the power of the commanded transmission until the non-cooperative node reports that the interference is decreased and, if the interference to the non-cooperative node continues, sequentially reduce the power of the commanded transmission until a node causing the interference is located.
0. 17. A method for a network of secondary communication devices comprising transceivers, base stations and a central controller to identify which device is causing interference to a primary user, the method comprising:
marking the secondary system's signal when received by the primary receiver by amplitude modulating the secondary signal,
providing a method for an affected primary user to communicate with the secondary system's central controller and communicate the primary receiver's location and the channel frequency,
determining, at the central controller, the closest secondary transceiver or secondary base station to the primary node and the likely frequencies being transmitted that might cause the interference,
commanding the secondary transceiver or secondary base station to transmit data,
sequentially reducing the power of the closet secondary transceiver or base station until the primary user reports that the problem is resolved, and
if the interference to the primary receiver continues, determine the next closest secondary transceiver or secondary base station to the primary node and repeating the previous step until the secondary node causing the interference is located.
0. 15. A method for a network of secondary communication devices comprising transceivers, base stations and a central controller sharing a radio frequency channel with existing primary users with minimal interference to the primary users, the method comprising the steps of:
each secondary transceiver and secondary base station measuring the primary signal level in the channel,
each secondary transceiver communicating the signal level to the central controller, and the central controller determining which channels each node may potentially use by comparing the primary signal level to a threshold value,
wherein proximate primary receive only radios are identified to each secondary transceiver and secondary base station by having each secondary transceivers and secondary base stations measure the strength of the primary receiver's local oscillator leakage, those signals above a threshold value indicating a proximate receive-only node,
determining the proximate receiver's frequency using well-known standards information,
restricting the secondary transceivers' or secondary base station's transmit frequency list from harmonically related values, adjacent channel values, or image related values compared to the primary signal.
0. 14. A method for a network of secondary communication devices comprising transceivers, base stations and a central controller sharing a radio frequency channel with existing primary users with minimal interference to the primary users, the method comprising the steps of:
each secondary transceiver and secondary base station measuring the primary signal level in the channel,
each secondary transceiver communicating the signal level to the central controller,
the central controller determining which channels each node may potentially use by comparing the primary signal level to a threshold value,
determining a proximate radio's receive frequency using well-known standards information, and
restricting the secondary transceiver's or secondary base station's transmit frequency list from harmonically related values, adjacent channel values, or image related values compared to the primary signal,
wherein proximate primary receivers are identified to each secondary transceiver and secondary base station by having each secondary transceiver and secondary base station measure the strength of all strong signals within a certain range of the spectrum, each signal with a power level above a threshold value indicating a proximate nodes.
6. A method for a network of secondary communication devices consisting of transceivers, base stations and a central controller sharing a radio frequency channel with existing primary users with minimal interference to the primary users comprising the steps of:
each secondary transceiver and secondary base station measuring the primary signal level in the channel,
each secondary transceiver communicating the signal level to the central controller, and
the central controller determining which channels each node may potentially use by comparing the primary signal level to a threshold value,
wherein proximate primary receive only radios are identified to each secondary transceivers and secondary base stations by having each secondary transceivers and secondary base stations measure the strength of the primary receiver's local oscillator leakage, and
and those signals above a threshold value declare that these is a proximate receive-only node, and
determine the proximate receiver's frequency using well-known standards information, and
restricting the secondary transceivers or secondary base station's transmit frequency list from harmonically related values, adjacent channel values, or image related values compared to the primary signal.
5. A method for a network of secondary communication devices consisting of transceivers, base stations and a central controller sharing a radio frequency channel with existing primary users with minimal interference to the primary users comprising the steps of:
each secondary transceiver and secondary base station measuring the primary signal level in the channel,
each secondary transceiver communicating the signal level to the central controller,
the central controller determining which channels each node may potentially use by comparing the primary signal level to a threshold value,
wherein proximate primary receivers are identified to each secondary transceivers and secondary base stations by having each secondary transceiver and secondary base station measure the strength of all strong signals within a certain range of the spectrum, and
those signals with a power level above a threshold value declare that these are proximate nodes, and
determine the proximate radio's receive frequency using well-known standards information, and
restricting the secondary transceiver's or secondary base station's transmit frequency list from harmonically related values, adjacent channel values, or image related values compared to the primary signal.
8. A method for a network of secondary communication devices consisting of transceivers, base stations and a central controller to identify which device is causing interference to a primary user comprising of the steps of,
a method to unambiguously marking the secondary system's signal when received by the primary receiver such as, but not limited to, amplitude modulating the secondary signal, and
provide a method for the affected primary user to communicate with the secondary system's central controller and communicate the primary receiver's location and the channel frequency, and
the central controller determine the closest secondary transceiver or secondary base station to the primary node and the likely frequencies being transmitted that might cause the interference, and
command the secondary transceiver or secondary base station to transmit data, and
sequentially reducing the power of the closet secondary transceiver or base station until the primary user reports that the problem is resolved, and
if the interference to the primary receiver continues, determine the next closest secondary transceiver or secondary base station to the primary node and repeating the previous step until the secondary node causing the interference is located.
0. 18. A method for a network of secondary communication devices comprising transceivers, base stations and a central controller sharing a radio frequency channel with existing primary users with minimal interference to the primary users, the method comprising the steps of:
each secondary transceiver and secondary base station measuring the primary signal level in the channel,
each secondary transceiver communicating the signal level to the central controller, and
the central controller determining which channels each node may potentially use by comparing the primary signal level to a threshold value,
wherein each secondary transceiver and secondary base station measures the strength of multiple signals from several other stationary transmitters and by analysis of these signal level amplitudes and if there is significant co-channel interference determines if the secondary transceiver or secondary base station is moving or elevated, and
if the secondary transceiver or secondary base station is moving or elevated, using more conservative spectrum assignments that include one or more of the following: reducing the node's maximum transmitted power, increasing the repetition rate of the node's probing and primary signal level measurements, and use of another channel.
9. A method for a network of secondary communication devices consisting of transceivers, base stations and a central controller sharing a radio frequency channel with existing primary users with minimal interference to the primary users comprising the steps of:
each secondary transceiver and secondary base station measuring the primary signal level in the channel,
each secondary transceiver communicating the signal level to the central controller, and
the central controller determining which channels each node may potentially use by comparing the primary signal level to a threshold value,
wherein each secondary transceivers arid secondary base stations measures the strength of multiple signals from several other stationary transmitters and by analysis of these signal level amplitudes and if there is significant co-channel interference determines if the secondary transceiver or secondary base station is moving or elevated, and
if the secondary transceiver or secondary base station is moving or elevated, then the node will use more conservative spectrum assignments that include one or more of the following: reducing the node's maximum transmitted power, Increasing the repetition rate of the node's probing and primary signal level measurements, and use of another channel.
1. A method for a network of secondary communication devices consisting of transceivers, base stations and a central controller sharing a radio frequency channel with existing primary users with minimal interference to the primary users comprising the steps of:
each secondary transceiver and secondary base station measuring the primary signal level in the channel,
each secondary transceiver communicating the signal level to the central controller, and
the central controller determining which channels each node may potentially use by comparing the primary signal level to a threshold value,
wherein a portion of the secondary transceivers and secondary base stations in a region distant from where the channel is being used sequentially transmit a short duration probe signal with a certain power level (P_probe),
the secondary transceivers and secondary base stations within a primary region where the channel is being used measure the probe signal amplitude value (P_received) and send these values to the central controller, and
the central controller determines the maximum power level for each secondary transceivers and secondary base stations in the distant region by the formula: P_transmission (dBm)=P_probe (dBm)−P_received (dBm)+constant, with the value of the constant depending on the maximum interference level allowed in the primary region plus a safety margin, and
the above steps are repeated at regular intervals.
0. 10. A method for a network of secondary communication devices comprising transceivers, base stations and a central controller sharing a radio frequency channel with existing primary users with minimal interference to the primary users, the method comprising the steps of:
each secondary transceiver and secondary base station measuring the primary signal level in the channel,
each secondary transceiver communicating the signal level to the central controller, and
the central controller determining which channels each node may potentially use by comparing the primary signal level to a threshold value,
wherein a portion of the secondary transceivers and secondary base stations in a region distant from where the channel is being used sequentially transmit a short duration probe signal with a certain power level (P—probe),
the secondary transceivers and secondary base stations within a primary region where the channel is being used measure the probe signal amplitude value (P received) and send these values to the central controller, and
the central controller determines the maximum power level for each secondary transceivers and secondary base stations in the distant region by the formula: P transmission (dBm)=P—probe (dBm)−P received (dBm)+constant, with the value of the constant depending on the maximum interference level allowed in the primary region plus a safety margin, and
the above steps are repeated at regular intervals.
2. The method according to
using high processing gain probe waveforms such as, but not limited to, direct sequence waveforms, single or multiple continuous wave (CW) tones.
3. The method of
0. 11. The method according to claim 10, further comprising the step of:
using high processing gain probe waveforms such as, but not limited to, direct sequence waveforms, single or multiple continuous wave (CW) tones.
0. 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the high processing gain probe waveform is either multiple CW waveforms or combinations of narrowband waveforms, each with energy in a frequency zone within the NTSC six MHz channel width and minimal energy at other frequencies in the channel, the frequency zone being in the lower and upper guard bands, between the video carrier and the color-subcarrier, or between the color-subcarrier and the sound carrier.
0. 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the first level is at least the noise level and the second level is not greater than a threshold value used to identify the channel as available for use.
0. 22. The method of claim 21, wherein the first node is the closest of the plurality of transceivers to the non-cooperative receiver.
0. 23. The method of claim 21, wherein the non-cooperative node's location and the channel on which interference is received is communicated to the central controller.
0. 25. The system of claim 24, wherein the first level is at least the noise level and the second level is not greater than a threshold value used to identify the channel as available for use.
0. 27. The system of claim 26, wherein the first node is the closest of the plurality of transceivers to the non-cooperative receiver.
0. 28. The system of claim 26, wherein the non-cooperative node's location and the channel on which interference is received is communicated to the central controller.
0. 30. The device of claim 29, wherein the first level is at least the noise level and the second level is not greater than a threshold value used to identify the channel as available for use.
0. 31. The device of claim 29, wherein said communication module comprises a tuner, a programmable modem, or a combination thereof.
0. 33. The device of claim 32, said communication module further configured to receive the non-cooperative node's location and the channel on which interference is received.
0. 34. The device of claim 32, wherein said communication module is a tuner, a programmable modem, or a combination thereof.
|
it has approximately the same level of impact to the TV signal as a broadband waveform used to send data, but this waveform can be received with a narrow bandwidth (˜10 Hz) receiver compared to a wide bandwidth (several MHz) broadband receiver, thus it can be transmitted at much lower (˜50 dB) amplitude and will have minimal impact to the primary signal.
The relative amplitudes of the CW tones in each zone are shown in
To receive this waveform, standard FFT processing techniques are used to measure the amplitude of each CW tone and the amplitudes are normalized by the 30 dB and 10 dB amounts described above. Selective fading will cause the relative amplitude of each tone to vary just as would occur with a data waveform and must be accounted for to estimate the interference caused by a data waveform. To account for fading, the largest of the four CW tone amplitudes is used to estimate the worse case channel conditions. The probability that all four tones are faded causing the propagation losses to be over estimated is very low.
If the primary signal is other than NTSC TV video signals, the probe signal is a conventional BPSK waveform with bandwidth approximately equal to the channel bandwidth. This sets the chip rate at approximately the inverse of the bandwidth (a 10 MHz bandwidth would have a chip rate of 10 Mcps). The waveform transmits a pseudo random sequence with the maximum length that can be coherently integrated when limited by channel conditions or receiver hardware complexity. In non-line-of-sight (LOS) propagation conditions, the maximum channel coherence time is approximately 100 ms. Current low cost receiver hardware is limited to sampling and processing approximately 10,000 samples. Assuming 2 samples per chip, the maximum sequence is approximately 5,000 samples. Thus, the sequence length is set to the minimum of the chip rate (symbols per second) times 100 ms (the maximum sequence duration) and 5,000.
To receive the BPSK probe signal, the secondary receiver samples the signal for a period equal to the transmit period and using a non-linear technique to measure the amplitude of probe signal. Each sample value is squared and the resulting series analyzed using an FFT. At the frequency corresponding to twice the chip rate, a narrow bandwidth spectral line will exist with amplitude that is related to the received probe signal amplitude. It is well known to those familiar in the art that this technique is able identify BPSK signals with amplitude well below the noise level and provides nearly optimal signal detection performance. Thus, the probe signal can be transmitted at a much lower power level than a regular data signal (which reduces interference to the primary signal) and can still be detected.
Once the probe signal amplitudes are measured at the secondary transceivers 20 and secondary base stations 22 in service area B 28, the values are sent to the secondary central controller 30 who then decides what the maximum power level each secondary transceiver 20 and secondary base station 22 can use with this channel as is described above.
In addition to measuring the primary background signal, each secondary transceiver 20 and secondary base station 22 will send data, receive probe signals and transmit probe signals. This information is sent to the central controller 30 via the high capacity network connecting the base stations 22. The notional time line for a transceiver is shown in
An additional innovation is a technique where the secondary transceivers 20 and base stations 22 modify their behavior when there are nearby primary receivers 10 or transmitters 12. Closely spaced (10's of meters) radios are susceptible to significant interference caused by non-linear mixing interference and interference caused by unintended out-of-band transmitted signals (phase noise, harmonics, and spurs). In the preferred approach, the secondary transceiver and base station (20 and 22) measure the spectrum and identify strong signals that indicate proximate primary transceivers. Each secondary node (20 and 22) will then avoid transmitting on frequencies likely to cause interference to that specific radio. The frequencies to avoid can be determined using a simple model that includes harmonically related signals and cross products of the primary signal with the secondary signal. For example, if a strong cell phone transmission is detected at 890 MHz, it can be inferred that a receiver is nearby tuned to 935 MHz (cell phone channels are paired). The secondary system may have a significant harmonic at 935 MHz when it transmits at 233.75 MHz (4th harmonic is 935 MHz) and at 467.5 MHz (2nd harmonic is 935 MHz). To avoid causing interference, this specific secondary node would restrict its transmitted power at these frequencies to low values or change to another frequency.
In broadcast bands (i.e. TV), the primary receiver's 10 local oscillator leakage will be detected to determine if there is a nearby receiver as shown in
To measure the LO signal amplitude, fast Fourier transform (FFT) methods are used to create a narrow (˜10 Hz) bandwidth receiver. The LO signals are detected by searching for stable, narrow bandwidth, continuous wave (CW) signals.
In the preferred embodiment of this invention, the secondary signal waveform is selected based on the interference measurements made by the secondary transceivers 20 and secondary base stations 22. If the interference measurements indicate that the primary signal is below the threshold value used to declare the channel open for use and the primary signal level is well above the noise level, then the secondary signal spectrum is reduced to fit into gaps of the primary spectrum (from 1.5 MHz above the channel start frequency to 5.5 MHz above the channel start frequency) as shown in
There are many types of waveforms that could be used to optimize performance in a high multipath link or in high quality (line-of-sight) link.
The primary user reports his location, the channel with interference and the time of the interference. The central controller identifies all secondary transceivers 20 and secondary base stations 22 within a distance X of the primary user active within the time period in question, and identifies what additional channels may have caused the interference due to adjacent channel or image rejection problems. Using propagation and interference models, the maximum power each secondary transceiver 20 and secondary base station 22 is allowed to transmit, the probability of each secondary node is calculated. The secondary nodes are sorted by this probability. If the interference is still present, a secondary central controller 30 tasks the most probable secondary node to temporarily cease transmitting and then asks the primary user if the problem has cleared. If not, the secondary central controller 30 goes to the next probable node and repeats this process (expanding the distance X as required) until the offending secondary node is identified.
If the primary user had reported the interference as intermittent (due to variations in the secondary traffic loading), the secondary central controller 30 commands the secondary nodes to transmit for each of the above tests instead of ceasing to transmit.
Once the secondary node causing the interference is identified, the maximum transmit power level that node can transmit in that channel is reduced until there is no interference. This is accomplished by the secondary central controller 30 iteratively tasking the secondary node to transmit signal at varying power levels until the primary user reports no interference.
Secondary transceivers 20 and base stations 22 that are highly elevated compared to the surrounding terrain have line-of-sight to a large area and will have much lower propagation losses to the surround primary nodes compared to secondary nodes that are at low altitude. Because they are more likely to cause interference, they are assigned frequencies that are the least likely to cause interference as determined by the probe measurements described above. To determine if a secondary node is elevated, the node measures the strength of several primary signals (at different frequencies) in the area as shown in
In some system applications, the frequency range of the secondary system will not include the standard broadcast bands. The elevation of a secondary node can still be inferred using signals from primary cellular, PCS, or other systems (that are not constant amplitude). These systems use frequency re-use schemes where channels are assigned to different cell towers. If the node is elevated, it will receive strong amplitude signals at many frequencies within the frequency re-use scheme. If the node is not elevated, it will receive strong amplitude signals at only one or two frequencies within the frequency re-use scheme.
As mentioned above, the system will use a slightly different scheme to allocate frequencies for mobile nodes. To determine if a node is stationary or mobile, the system will periodically (approximately once per second) measure the amplitude of background primary signals. As shown in
Accordingly, the reader will see that the method described above allows efficient secondary use of spectrum while causing minimum interference to the primary user. The method has minimal impact to the choices of the secondary system could be added as an applique to existing or planned communication systems. It requires no modification to the existing primary user. The technology can be economically built with existing component technology.
The invention will provide 100's of megahertz of spectrum to be used which before was unavailable to new uses and will provide this spectrum below 2 GHz which is the most useful portion for mobile and non-line-of-sight applications. Because the method has minimal effect on the present primary users, it allows a gradual transition from the present fixed frequency based, broadcast use of the spectrum set-up in the 1930's to the computer controlled, fully digital, packet based, frequency agile systems coming in the near future. With the advent of the Internet and the need for high-speed connectivity to rural and mobile users, the present spectrum use methods are inadequate and will not be able to meet this need. This invention will provide spectrum for the new Internet driven demand while not significantly impacting the present spectrum users.
The invention described here has many advantages. The technique used by each secondary node uses multiple effective ways (propagation models, measuring the primary signal level and probing) to identify what channels are available. The technique of amplitude modulating the secondary signals allows accurate measurement of the primary signal levels while the secondary system is operating. Using the special probe waveforms allows these measurements to me made with minimal impact to the primary system. Varying the secondary waveform greatly reduces the impact to the primary system while increasing the capacity of the secondary system. The methods to detect node elevation and node motion allow for rapid checking and adjustment of spectrum allocations making this technique applicable to mobile applications.
Although the description above contains many specifications, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention but as merely providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments of this invention. For example, the primary system could be the present broadcast TV system. However, the methods described here would be equally effective with sharing between commercial and military systems, with sharing between radar and communications systems and others.
Thus the scope of the invention should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather than by the examples given.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10122479, | Jan 23 2017 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection with temporal feature extraction within a spectrum |
10219163, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
10231206, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management for identifying signal-emitting devices |
10237099, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management for identifying open space |
10237770, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC | Systems, methods, and devices having databases and automated reports for electronic spectrum management |
10244504, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC | Systems, methods, and devices for geolocation with deployable large scale arrays |
10257727, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems methods, and devices having databases and automated reports for electronic spectrum management |
10257728, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
10257729, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices having databases for electronic spectrum management |
10271233, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection with temporal feature extraction within a spectrum |
10284309, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
10299149, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
10459020, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection based on power distribution by frequency over time within a spectrum |
10492091, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC | Systems, methods, and devices having databases and automated reports for electronic spectrum management |
10498951, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC | Systems, methods, and devices for unmanned vehicle detection |
10517005, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
10529241, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC | Unmanned vehicle recognition and threat management |
10531323, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices having databases and automated reports for electronic spectrum management |
10554317, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
10555180, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
10575274, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management for identifying signal-emitting devices |
10582471, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC | Systems, methods, and devices for geolocation with deployable large scale arrays |
10609586, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices having databases for electronic spectrum management |
10623976, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
10644815, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection based on power distribution by frequency over time within an electromagnetic spectrum |
10644912, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management for identifying open space |
10645601, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection with temporal feature extraction within a spectrum |
10694413, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices having databases and automated reports for electronic spectrum management |
10700794, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection based on power distribution by frequency over time within an electromagnetic spectrum |
10797917, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management for identifying open space |
10798297, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for unmanned vehicle detection |
10859619, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection based on power distribution by frequency over time within a spectrum |
10943461, | Aug 24 2018 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection based on power distribution by frequency over time |
10943493, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Unmanned vehicle recognition and threat management |
10945146, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices having databases and automated reports for electronic spectrum management |
10959204, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for geolocation with deployable large scale arrays |
10999752, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
11076308, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
11082859, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
11082869, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices having databases for electronic spectrum management |
11082870, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection with temporal feature extraction within a spectrum |
11115585, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for unmanned vehicle detection |
11140648, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management for identifying signal-emitting devices |
11159256, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection based on power distribution by frequency over time within an electromagnetic spectrum |
11221357, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection based on power distribution by frequency over time within a spectrum |
11223431, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
11234146, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices having databases and automated reports for electronic spectrum management |
11259197, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices having databases and automated reports for electronic spectrum management |
11322011, | Aug 24 2018 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection based on power distribution by frequency over time |
11328609, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Unmanned vehicle recognition and threat management |
11375580, | Sep 23 2020 | Sprint Spectrum LLC | Managing secondary node and channel assignment based on wireless device characteristics |
11463898, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
11470572, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for geolocation with deployable large scale arrays |
11509512, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management for identifying open space |
11521498, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Unmanned vehicle recognition and threat management |
11549976, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection based on power distribution by frequency over time within a spectrum |
11558764, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices having databases for electronic spectrum management |
11588562, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
11601833, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection with temporal feature extraction within a spectrum |
11617089, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
11622170, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for unmanned vehicle detection |
11637641, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
11645921, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Unmanned vehicle recognition and threat management |
11646918, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management for identifying open space |
11647409, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices having databases and automated reports for electronic spectrum management |
11653236, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
11665565, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices having databases for electronic spectrum management |
11665664, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management for identifying signal-emitting devices |
11668739, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection based on power distribution by frequency over time within a spectrum |
11676472, | Aug 24 2018 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection based on power distribution by frequency over time |
11706651, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection with temporal feature extraction within a spectrum |
11736952, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
11750911, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for unmanned vehicle detection |
11764883, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection based on power distribution by frequency over time within an electromagnetic spectrum |
11783712, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Unmanned vehicle recognition and threat management |
11791913, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
11792762, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management for identifying signal-emitting devices |
11838154, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management for identifying open space |
11838780, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection with temporal feature extraction within a spectrum |
11860209, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection based on power distribution by frequency over time within a spectrum |
11869330, | Aug 24 2018 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for automatic signal detection based on power distribution by frequency over time |
11871103, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems, methods, and devices for unmanned vehicle detection |
11893893, | Jan 23 2017 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Unmanned vehicle recognition and threat management |
11901963, | Mar 15 2013 | DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC. | Systems and methods for analyzing signals of interest |
8750156, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management for identifying open space |
8780968, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
8787836, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices having databases and automated reports for electronic spectrum management |
8798548, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices having databases for electronic spectrum management |
8805291, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
8805292, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management for identifying signal-emitting devices |
8824536, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
9002289, | Mar 01 2010 | NEC Corporation | Wireless communication apparatus, wireless communication system, interference causing control method, storage medium and control apparatus |
9078162, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
9288683, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
9350519, | May 06 2010 | InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc | Systems and methods for dynamic whitespace spectrum management |
9414237, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
9622041, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
9985810, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management for identifying open space |
9986577, | Feb 19 2013 | VANU, INC | Spectrum access system |
9998243, | Mar 15 2013 | DGS Global Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3893064, | |||
3935572, | Nov 23 1973 | Hughes Aircraft Company | System for resolving velocity ambiguity in pulse-doppler radar |
4107613, | Feb 11 1977 | WIREMOLD COMPANY, THE | Wireless microphone with FM receiver muting system responsive to excessive undesired AM level or low AGC control level |
4119964, | Oct 28 1976 | Systems and methods for determining radio frequency interference | |
4227255, | Apr 11 1979 | Telcom, Inc. | Signal classifier |
4305150, | May 31 1979 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | On-line channel quality monitor for a communication channel |
4398220, | Sep 05 1980 | Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Circuit for detecting the operational state of a television receiver |
4501020, | Sep 21 1982 | MILLER COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS LTD | Spectrum surveillance receiver system |
4672657, | Dec 17 1985 | Motorola, Inc. | Multichannel telephone system |
4736453, | Dec 10 1985 | WIRELESS SPECTRUM TECHNOLOGY INC | Method and apparatus for making frequency channel assignment in a cellular or non-cellular radiotelephone communications system |
4783780, | Jul 09 1985 | U S PHILIPS CORPORATION, 100 EAST 42ND STREET, NEW YORK, NY, 10017, A CORP OF DE | Method and apparatus for selecting a free channel in a mobile radio system |
4803703, | Apr 30 1987 | Motorola, Inc. | Apparatus and method for fine synchronization of a communication receiver |
4878238, | Dec 23 1987 | Cordless telephone network | |
4881271, | Mar 20 1987 | FIPA Frohwitter Intellectual Property AG | Portable wireless communication systems |
4918730, | Jun 24 1987 | TELEVOTUM GESELLSCHAFT ZUR VERMITTLUNG UND VERWERTUNG VON TELEKOMMUNICATIONSDIENSTEN MBH; MEDICOR GMBH EDV-SERVICE UN DATENERFASSUNG | Process and circuit arrangement for the automatic recognition of signal sequences |
4977612, | Oct 10 1989 | Motorola, Inc. | Channel selection in a multi-frequency radio data communication system |
5040238, | Jun 29 1990 | Motorola, Inc | Trunking system communication resource reuse method |
5093924, | Sep 19 1989 | NTT Mobile Communications Network, Inc | Channel assigning method in a mobile communication system |
5093927, | Oct 20 1989 | Motorola, Inc. | Two-way communication system |
5142690, | Mar 20 1990 | TECH 5 SAS | Cable television radio frequency data processor |
5142691, | Apr 05 1991 | Motorola, Inc.; MOTOROLA, INC , A CORP OF DE | Frequency management system |
5151747, | Oct 11 1991 | OL SECURITY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY | Laser radar wire detection |
5155590, | Mar 20 1990 | Cisco Technology, Inc | System for data channel level control |
5162937, | Jan 16 1990 | ALCATEL N V | Optical cable television transmission system |
5177604, | May 14 1986 | Radio Telcom & Technology, Inc. | Interactive television and data transmission system |
5177767, | Mar 06 1990 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Spread-spectrum communication system |
5179722, | Dec 18 1989 | Method for determining multiple interference in a mobile radio system | |
5203012, | Feb 10 1992 | Motorola Mobility, Inc | Method and apparatus for optimum channel assignment |
5225902, | Mar 20 1990 | TECH 5 SAS | Automatic frequency selection in a bi-directional cable television system |
5239676, | Dec 14 1990 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Intra-cell call hand-over in radio communication systems with dynamic channel allocation |
5247701, | Jun 29 1990 | Motorola, Inc | On-site/trunking system frequency sharing |
5260974, | May 10 1991 | Echelon Corporation | Adaptive carrier detection |
5271036, | Nov 16 1990 | Thomson-CSF | Method and device for the recognition of modulations |
5276908, | Oct 25 1990 | Nortel Networks Limited | Call set-up and spectrum sharing in radio communication on systems with dynamic channel allocation |
5325088, | Dec 02 1991 | Motorola, Inc. | Synchronous selective signalling system |
5375123, | Feb 05 1993 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson | Allocation of channels using interference estimation |
5402523, | Aug 30 1991 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson | Combined mobile radio communication system |
5410737, | Apr 27 1992 | American PCS Communications, LLC | Frequency agile sharing technology (FAST) for a personal communications service system |
5412658, | Oct 22 1993 | Intellectual Ventures II LLC | Beacon detection method and apparatus for sharing spectrum between wireless communications systems and fixed microwave systems |
5422912, | Jun 23 1994 | Grumman Aerospace Corporation | Adaptive weak signal identification system |
5422930, | May 20 1993 | Motorola Mobility LLC | Method and apparatus for sharing radio frequency spectrum in a radio frequency communication system |
5428819, | Apr 27 1993 | Motorola Mobility LLC | Method and apparatus for radio frequency bandwidth sharing among heterogeneous radio communication system |
5448753, | Sep 05 1988 | TIME SPACE RADIO AB | Wide area radio communication network system and method |
5475868, | Aug 04 1992 | U S PHILIPS CORPORATION | Cellular radio system having channel evaluation and optimal channel selection via trial use of non-assigned channels |
5497505, | Oct 25 1990 | Nortel Networks Limited | Call set-up and spectrum sharing in radio communication on systems with dynamic channel allocation |
5502688, | Nov 23 1994 | GENERAL DYNAMICS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC | Feedforward neural network system for the detection and characterization of sonar signals with characteristic spectrogram textures |
5511233, | Apr 05 1994 | ATC Technologies, LLC | System and method for mobile communications in coexistence with established communications systems |
5548809, | Jul 15 1992 | SBC Technology Resources, INC | Spectrum sharing communications system and system for monitoring available spectrum |
5553081, | Apr 08 1994 | Echelon Corporation | Apparatus and method for detecting a signal in a communications system |
5585850, | Oct 31 1994 | Treble Investments Limited Liability Company | Adaptive distribution system for transmitting wideband video data over narrowband multichannel wireless communication system |
5608727, | May 02 1995 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Method and system for management of frequency spectrum among multiple applications on a shared medium |
5655217, | Jul 15 1992 | SBC Technology Resources, INC | Spectrum sharing communications system for monitoring available spectrum |
5668747, | Mar 09 1994 | Fujitsu Limited | Coefficient updating method for an adaptive filter |
5748678, | Jul 13 1995 | MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC | Radio communications apparatus |
5752164, | Apr 27 1992 | American PCS Communications, LLC | Autonomous remote measurement unit for a personal communications service system |
5794151, | Dec 22 1995 | MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC | Frequency allocation for shared spectrum transmitter based on location |
5822686, | Dec 11 1995 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson | Channel scanning scheme for signal strength measurement systems and methods |
5828948, | Apr 07 1995 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson | Dynamic allocation of channels in a cellular telephone system |
5850605, | Nov 05 1996 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for dynamically grouping transmitters for message transmission in a communication system |
5862487, | Jan 25 1995 | NTT Mobile Communications Network Inc | Channel allocation for co-located systems based on interferring channel groups |
5884181, | Jan 19 1996 | NYTELL SOFTWARE LLC | Interference reduction in shared-frequency wireless communication systems |
5889821, | Feb 28 1997 | Comsat Corporation | Low noise front-end blanking and interleaving for satellite reception in pulsed interference environments |
5939887, | Sep 05 1997 | Tektronix, Inc.; Tektronix, Inc | Method for measuring spectral energy interference in a cable transmission system |
5943622, | Jun 24 1996 | NEC Corporation | Mobile radio communication system and automatic frequency allocation method |
5960351, | Feb 26 1997 | Ericsson Inc. | Radio frequency planning and assignment in a discontiguous spectrum environment |
5999561, | May 20 1997 | BNP PARIBAS, AS SECURITY AGENT | Direct sequence spread spectrum method, computer-based product, apparatus and system tolerant to frequency reference offset |
6011970, | Jul 23 1997 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and system for assuring near uniform capacity and quality of channels in cells of wireless communications systems having cellular architectures |
6044090, | Dec 30 1996 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Method and apparatus for channel management in a communication system |
6047175, | Jun 28 1996 | Cisco Technology, Inc | Wireless communication method and device with auxiliary receiver for selecting different channels |
6049707, | Sep 02 1997 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Broadband multicarrier amplifier system and method using envelope elimination and restoration |
6049717, | Feb 02 1998 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson | Operator assisted tool and method for frequency plan revision within a cellular telephone system |
6141557, | May 31 1996 | NORTH SOUTH HOLDINGS INC | LMDS system having cell-site diversity and adaptability |
6147553, | Mar 06 1998 | Celiant Corporation; ANDREW AMPLIFIERS, INC | Amplification using amplitude reconstruction of amplitude and/or angle modulated carrier |
6154501, | Feb 04 1998 | VIRLITE COMMUNICATION LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY | Method and apparatus for combining transponders on multiple satellites into virtual channels |
6157811, | Jan 11 1994 | Ericsson Inc. | Cellular/satellite communications system with improved frequency re-use |
6178328, | Jul 17 1997 | RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC | Method and system for solving cellular communications frequency planning problem |
6188873, | Jun 09 1999 | HANGER SOLUTIONS, LLC | Broadband radio access method, device and system |
6208858, | Jul 21 1998 | QUALCOMM INCORPORATED A DELAWARE CORP | System and method for reducing call dropping rates in a multi-beam communication system |
6240274, | Apr 21 1999 | HRL Laboratories, LLC | High-speed broadband wireless communication system architecture |
6269331, | Nov 14 1996 | Nokia Mobile Phones Limited | Transmission of comfort noise parameters during discontinuous transmission |
6295289, | Nov 30 1998 | Seagate Technology, INC; Nokia Mobile Phones, Ltd | Power control in a transmitter |
6304140, | Jun 12 2000 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc | Digital predistortion for amplifiers |
6356555, | Aug 25 1995 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Apparatus and method for digital data transmission using orthogonal codes |
6380879, | Aug 21 1997 | Data Fusion Corporation | Method and apparatus for acquiring wide-band pseudorandom noise encoded waveforms |
6522885, | Jul 17 1997 | RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC | Method and system for solving cellular communications frequency planning problem |
6526264, | Nov 03 2000 | Cisco Technology, Inc | Wideband multi-protocol wireless radio transceiver system |
6529715, | Feb 26 1999 | QUARTERHILL INC ; WI-LAN INC | Amplifier architecture for multi-carrier wide-band communications |
6570444, | Jan 26 2000 | MAXLINEAR ASIA SINGAPORE PTE LTD | Low noise wideband digital predistortion amplifier |
6597301, | Oct 03 2001 | Shure Incorporated | Apparatus and method for level-dependent companding for wireless audio noise reduction |
6606593, | Nov 15 1996 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Methods for generating comfort noise during discontinuous transmission |
6615040, | Jan 22 1999 | AT&T Corp | Self-configurable wireless systems: spectrum monitoring in a layered configuration |
6625111, | Mar 16 1999 | Redwood Technologies, LLC | OFDM communication apparatus |
6671503, | Jun 03 1999 | Kabushiki Kaisha Audio-Technica | Wireless microphone system |
6675012, | Mar 08 2001 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Apparatus, and associated method, for reporting a measurement summary in a radio communication system |
6687492, | Mar 01 2002 | IPR LICENSING INC | System and method for antenna diversity using joint maximal ratio combining |
6690746, | Jun 11 1999 | Southwest Research Institute | Signal recognizer for communications signals |
6697436, | Jul 13 1999 | MAXLINEAR ASIA SINGAPORE PTE LTD | Transmission antenna array system with predistortion |
6700450, | Jul 29 2002 | IPR LICENSING INC | Voltage-controlled oscillator with an automatic amplitude control circuit |
6714605, | Apr 22 2002 | Cisco Technology, Inc | System and method for real-time spectrum analysis in a communication device |
6714780, | Jul 21 1998 | Qualcomm Incorporated | System and method for reducing call dropping rates in a multi-beam communication system |
6728517, | Apr 22 2002 | IPR LICENSING INC | Multiple-input multiple-output radio transceiver |
6771957, | Nov 30 2001 | InterDigital Technology Corporation | Cognition models for wireless communication systems and method and apparatus for optimal utilization of a radio channel based on cognition model data |
6785520, | Mar 01 2002 | IPR LICENSING INC | System and method for antenna diversity using equal power joint maximal ratio combining |
6792268, | Sep 07 2001 | AT&T Corporation | Method for uplink spectrum monitoring for sparse overlay TDMA systems |
6799020, | Jul 20 1999 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Parallel amplifier architecture using digital phase control techniques |
6816832, | Nov 14 1996 | Nokia Corporation | Transmission of comfort noise parameters during discontinuous transmission |
6847678, | Apr 25 2002 | Raytheon Company | Adaptive air interface waveform |
6850735, | Apr 22 2002 | Cisco Technology, Inc | System and method for signal classiciation of signals in a frequency band |
6850764, | Dec 17 1998 | Cisco Technology, Inc; Cisco Systems, Inc | Method and system for allocating bandwidth in a wireless communications network |
6862456, | Mar 01 2002 | IPR LICENSING INC | Systems and methods for improving range for multicast wireless communication |
6904269, | Jun 02 2000 | Tektronix, Inc. | Signal type identification |
6941110, | Jan 14 2003 | Cisco Technology, Inc | Mitigating interference with frequency hopping signals by deriving future hop frequencies |
6952563, | Aug 02 2000 | Metric Systems, INC | Method and apparatus for adaptively setting frequency channels in a multi-point wireless networking system |
6959178, | Apr 22 2002 | IPR LICENSING INC | Tunable upconverter mixer with image rejection |
6965762, | Mar 01 2002 | IPR LICENSING INC | System and method for antenna diversity using joint maximal ratio combining |
6990087, | Apr 25 2002 | Raytheon Company | Dynamic wireless resource utilization |
6993440, | Apr 22 2002 | NORTH SOUTH HOLDINGS INC | System and method for waveform classification and characterization using multidimensional higher-order statistics |
7013345, | Jun 12 2000 | Metric Systems Corporation | Method and apparatus for wireless networking |
7035593, | Jul 28 2003 | Cisco Technology, Inc | Signal classification methods for scanning receiver and other applications |
7054625, | Nov 29 2002 | MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO , LTD | Wireless communication system, wireless microphone, and wireless microphone control method |
7058383, | May 30 2003 | IPR LICENSING INC | Signal interfacing techinques to simplify integrated circuit radio designs |
7089014, | Aug 06 2001 | Metric Systems, INC | Wireless communication system control apparatus and method |
7227974, | May 11 2001 | SOCIONEXT INC; THE FOUNDATION FOR THE PROMOTION OF INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE | Mobile unit identification apparatus and method and apparatus for automatically warning to mobile unit |
7260156, | Jun 28 2000 | Sony Deutschland GmbH | Modulation identification device |
7269151, | Apr 22 2002 | Cisco Technology, Inc | System and method for spectrum management of a shared frequency band |
7313393, | Nov 30 2001 | InterDigital Technology Corporation | Cognition models for wireless communication systems and method and apparatus for optimal utilization of a radio channel based on cognition model data |
7342876, | Dec 20 2001 | SRI International | Interference mitigation and adaptive routing in wireless ad-hoc packet-switched networks |
7424268, | Apr 22 2002 | Cisco Technology, Inc | System and method for management of a shared frequency band |
7428270, | Feb 15 1999 | Her Majesty The Queen In Right of Canada as represented by The Minister of Industry through the Communications Research Centre | Method and system for detecting and classifying the modulation of unknown analog and digital telecommunications signals |
7457295, | Dec 10 2002 | BONE VALLEY PATENTS, LLC | Radio communication system employing spectral reuse transceivers |
7463952, | Oct 13 2004 | Continental Automotive Systems US, Inc | Method and device for processing measurement signals from a movement sensor on board a motor vehicle |
7483700, | Aug 14 2006 | MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC | Method and apparatus for determining appropriate channels for communication |
7532857, | Mar 02 2005 | ROHDE & SCHWARZ GMBH & CO KG | Apparatus, systems and methods for providing time diversity for mobile broadcast services |
7564816, | May 12 2006 | Shared Spectrum Company | Method and system for determining spectrum availability within a network |
7610036, | Jan 08 2007 | Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. | Space-time-frequency sensing of RF spectrum in cognitive radios |
7613148, | Feb 13 2004 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd | Method and apparatus for performing fast handover through fast ranging in a broadband wireless communication system |
7742764, | Mar 23 2007 | MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC | Method and apparatus for determining appropriate channels for communication |
7826839, | Jan 30 2006 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Communication system to facilitate airborne electronic attack |
20010013834, | |||
20010046843, | |||
20020002052, | |||
20020196842, | |||
20030027577, | |||
20030081628, | |||
20030099218, | |||
20030165187, | |||
20030181173, | |||
20030181211, | |||
20030181213, | |||
20030198200, | |||
20030203743, | |||
20040017268, | |||
20040023674, | |||
20040047324, | |||
20040072546, | |||
20040121753, | |||
20040136466, | |||
20040142696, | |||
20040203474, | |||
20050070294, | |||
20050119006, | |||
20050192011, | |||
20050213580, | |||
20050213763, | |||
20050270218, | |||
20060075467, | |||
20060211395, | |||
20060220944, | |||
20060234716, | |||
20060246836, | |||
20070008875, | |||
20070019603, | |||
20070046467, | |||
20070053410, | |||
20070076745, | |||
20070091998, | |||
20070100922, | |||
20070165664, | |||
20070165695, | |||
20070183338, | |||
20070253394, | |||
20080010040, | |||
20080014880, | |||
20080031143, | |||
20080069079, | |||
20080228446, | |||
20080261537, | |||
20080267259, | |||
20080284648, | |||
20090074033, | |||
20090161610, | |||
20090190508, | |||
20090252178, | |||
20100008312, | |||
20100220618, | |||
20100296078, | |||
20110051645, | |||
EP1220499, | |||
GB2260879, | |||
WO2004054280, | |||
WO2006101489, | |||
WO2007034461, | |||
WO2007058490, | |||
WO2007094604, | |||
WO2007096819, | |||
WO2007108963, | |||
WO2007108966, | |||
WO2007109169, | |||
WO2007109170, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 02 2008 | Shared Spectrum Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 30 2012 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jan 03 2015 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jul 03 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 03 2016 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jan 03 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jan 03 2019 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jul 03 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 03 2020 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jan 03 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jan 03 2023 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jul 03 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 03 2024 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jan 03 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |