An apparatus, suited, for example, for extreme ultraviolet lithography, includes a radiation source and a processing organ for processing the radiation from the radiation source. Between the radiation source and the processing organ a filter is placed which, in the radial direction from the radiation source, comprises a plurality of foils or plates.

Patent
   RE44120
Priority
Feb 19 1998
Filed
Oct 19 2011
Issued
Apr 02 2013
Expiry
Feb 19 2019
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
0
43
all paid
12. A filter for suppressing undesired atomic and microscopic particles which are emitted by a radiation source, wherein a plurality of plates are positioned substantially parallel in relation to one another, for trapping atomic and microscopic particles on their respective surfaces, wherein the plates are directed radially away from the radiation source.
1. An apparatus comprising a radiation source and a processing organ for processing radiation from the radiation source, wherein a filter for suppressing undesired atomic and microscopic particles is placed between the radiation source and the processing organ, which filter comprises a plurality of foils or plates having surfaces for trapping atomic and microscopic particles thereon, wherein each foil or plate essentially points in a radial direction when viewed from the radiation source.
2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the foils or plates are positioned in a honeycomb construction.
3. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the foils or plates are coneshaped and are positioned concentrically.
4. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein in the radial direction the foils or plates are positioned such as to be evenly distributed in relation to one another.
5. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the radiation source and the processing organ are placed in a buffer gas, and wherein a distance between the radiation source and a proximal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source is selected subject to a pressure and a type of buffer gas.
6. The apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the buffer gas is krypton, wherein the pressure is at least approximately 0.1 Torr, and wherein the distance between the radiation source and the proximal end of the filter is 5 cm.
7. The apparatus according to claim 5, wherein a length of the filter, which is formed by the distance between the proximal end of the filter and its distal end in relation to the radiation source, is selected subject to the pressure of the buffer gas and a form of the filter.
8. The apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the length of the filter is at least 1 cm.
9. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the number of plates in the filter is adjusted subject to a thickness of each plate and a desired optical transparency of the filter as determined by the formula
d d + d f × 100 %
in which d=a distance between two plates of the filter at a proximal side of the filter; and df=a thickness of a plate of the filter.
10. The apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the number of plates is adjusted such that the distance between two plates is approximately 1 mm.
11. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein a surface of the plates is rough roughened to increase suppression of the undesired atomic and microscopic particles.
0. 13. The filter according to claim 12, wherein the plates are positioned in a honeycomb construction.
0. 14. The filter according to claim 12, wherein the plates are positioned such as to be evenly distributed in relation to one another.
0. 15. The filter according to claim 12, wherein the filter is to be disposed in a buffer gas, and wherein a distance between the radiation source and a proximal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source is selected subject to a pressure and a type of the buffer gas.
0. 16. The filter according to claim 15, wherein the buffer gas is krypton, wherein the pressure is at least approximately 0.1 Torr, and wherein the distance between the radiation source and the proximal end of the filter is 5 cm.
0. 17. The filter according to claim 12, wherein a length of the filter, which is the distance between a proximal end of the filter and a distal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source, is selected subject to a pressure of a buffer gas, in which the filter is to be disposed, and a form of the filter.
0. 18. The filter according to claim 17, wherein the length of the filter is at least 1 cm.
0. 19. The filter according to claim 12, wherein the number of plates in the filter, a thickness of a plate in the filter, a distance between two plates in the filter or any combination thereof is based on a desired optical transparency of the filter as determined by the formula:
d d + d f × 100 %
wherein d is a distance between two plates of the filter at a proximal end of the filter in relation to the radiation source and df is a thickness of a plate of the filter.
0. 20. The filter according to claim 19, wherein the distance between two plates in the filter is approximately 1 mm.
0. 21. The filter according to claim 12, wherein a surface of the plates is roughened to increase suppression of the undesired atomic and microscopic particles.

andnot shown as PO. This processing organ is located at the side of the filter 2 facing away from the radiation source 1. The filter 2 comprises a number of plates 3 positioned in a radial direction from the radiation source 1. It is possible to position said plates in a honeycomb construction, or as a plurality of concentric cones as shown in FIG. 3.

FIGS. 1 and 2 show that in the direction of radiation from the source 1, the plates are positioned such as to be evenly distributed next to one another. The proximal end 4 of the filter 2 is at a distance X from the radiation source 1, which distance is selected depending on the pressure and the type of buffer gas in which the radiation source 1, the processing organ (not shown), and also the filter 2, are placed. If the apparatus is used for extreme ultraviolet lithography, the buffer gas is preferably krypton having a pressure of 0.5 Torr, and the value of X may be 5 cm. The length of the plates of the filter is indicated by L. The value of L is selected depending on the pressure of the buffer gas and the form of the filter 2. The value of L, that is to say the length of the filter, is at least 1 cm. In FIG. 1, this value is approximately 10 cm. The thickness of the plates 3 may be, for example, 0.1 mm, and the spacing between the plates at the side nearest the radiation source 1, may be approximately 1 mm. This may result in an optical transparency of the filter 2, which is determined by the formula

d d + d f × 100 %
in which d=the distance between two plates of the filter at the proximal side of the filter; and df=the thickness of a plate of the filter.

The effectiveness of the filter can be promoted if the surface of the plates 3 is slightly roughened.

When the apparatus is used for extreme ultraviolet lithography, radiation is used having a wavelength of 13.5 nanometers. Various inert gasses may be used as buffer gas, such as helium and krypton which, compared with other gasses have the lowest absorption coefficient at this wavelength. Krypton is better able to meet the requirements of the present application because the atomic mass of krypton is more compatible with that of the atomic- and microparticles emitted by the radiation source, which augments the inhibition of said undesirable particles. The krypton gas used is maintained at a pressure of at least several mTorr. It should be noted that taken over a distance of 20 cm at a pressure of 0.5 Torr, the optical transparency of krypton for the desired radiation is approximately 90%. The filter used in the apparatus is comprised of copper plates (other materials are also possible) which have a length of 7 cm and are positioned at 2 cm from the radiation source. At a plate thickness of 0.2 mm and with the plates being spaced at approximately 0.8 mm at the side of the radiation source, the filter will have a geometrical transparency of approximately 80%. The effectiveness of the filter was measured at room temperature and at a temperature of approximately −90° C. At both these temperatures the effectiveness of the filter was shown to be very high, almost 100.

It will be clear to the person skilled in the art that the various dimensions of the filter forming part of the apparatus according to the invention, as well as the distance from the filter to the radiation source, has to be determined in practice on the basis of the above-mentioned inter-relating ratios. It is therefore possible to apply diverse variations to the above description, without departing from the idea of the invention as specified in the appended claims.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes could be made to the embodiments described above without departing from the broad inventive concept thereof. It is understood, therefore, that this invention is not limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but it is intended to cover modifications within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.

Shmaenok, Leonid

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
1865441,
3418467,
4242588, Aug 13 1979 UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY X-ray lithography system having collimating optics
4340818, May 14 1980 UAB RESEARCH FOUNDATION, THE, NON-PROFIT CORP Scanning grid apparatus for suppressing scatter in radiographic imaging
4408338, Dec 31 1981 International Business Machines Corporation Pulsed electromagnetic radiation source having a barrier for discharged debris
4672648, Oct 25 1985 Picker International, Inc.; PICKER INTERNATIONAL, INC Apparatus and method for radiation attenuation
4741012, Jan 29 1985 B V OPTISCHE INDUSTRIE DE OUDE DELFT Apparatus for slit radiography
4825454, Dec 28 1987 AMERICAN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, INC Tomographic imaging with concentric conical collimator
4837794, Oct 12 1984 MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC , A CORP OF DE Filter apparatus for use with an x-ray source
5099134, May 27 1988 Kabushiki Kasiha Toshiba Collimator and a method of producing a collimator for a scintillator
5265144, Jan 19 1991 Morpho Detection, Inc X-ray apparatus
5550678, Mar 14 1994 Siemens Medical Systems, Inc Focussing collimator of the Platz-Heinzelmann type and method of making Platz-Heinzelmann type collimators
5570408, Feb 28 1995 X-RAY OPTICAL SYSTEMS, INC High intensity, small diameter x-ray beam, capillary optic system
5768339, Oct 13 1995 Collimator for x-ray spectroscopy
6275568, Dec 22 1998 U S PHILIPS CORPORATION X-ray examination apparatus
6838684, Aug 23 2002 ASML NETHERLANDS B V Lithographic projection apparatus and particle barrier for use therein
7034308, Jun 27 2003 ASML NETHERLANDS B V Radiation system, contamination barrier, lithographic apparatus, device manufacturing method and device manufactured thereby
7057190, Aug 23 2002 ASML Netherlands B.V. Lithographic projection apparatus, particle barrier for use therein, integrated structure manufacturing method, and device manufactured thereby
7106832, Jan 10 2005 ASML NETHERLANDS B V Apparatus including a radiation source, a filter system for filtering particles out of radiation emitted by the source, and a processing system for processing the radiation, a lithographic apparatus including such an apparatus, and a method of filtering particles out of radiation emitting and propagating from a radiation source
7145132, Dec 27 2004 ASML NETHERLANDS B V Lithographic apparatus, illumination system and debris trapping system
7332731, Dec 06 2005 ASML NETHERLANDS B V Radiation system and lithographic apparatus
7442948, May 15 2006 ASML NETHERLANDS B V Contamination barrier and lithographic apparatus
7468521, Dec 28 2005 ASML NETHERLANDS B V Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method
20060139604,
20060169929,
20060186353,
20060219958,
20060261290,
20070018118,
20070023706,
EP682125,
EP1274287,
GB2083969,
JP200098098,
JP200157298,
JP7180042,
JP8321395,
JP9237695,
JP9245992,
JP9320792,
WO137309,
WO9610324,
WO9942904,
/
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Oct 19 2011ASML Netherlands B.V.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Apr 25 2013ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Sep 12 2013M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Apr 02 20164 years fee payment window open
Oct 02 20166 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 02 2017patent expiry (for year 4)
Apr 02 20192 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Apr 02 20208 years fee payment window open
Oct 02 20206 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 02 2021patent expiry (for year 8)
Apr 02 20232 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Apr 02 202412 years fee payment window open
Oct 02 20246 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 02 2025patent expiry (for year 12)
Apr 02 20272 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)