A process of segmenting a single email so that portions of it may be directed to or away from select recipients is disclosed. The sender highlights portions of the email and right clicks (or key command, button, or menu item) and selects an option to select recipients. The operator interface then provides the sender with the option of selecting recipients from their address book or the server's address book. To speed the process along, the sender may select those already on the To, Cc, or Bcc distribution lists. The sender then selects whether those chosen will receive the highlighted portion or if they will be excluded from receiving it. Lastly, the sender will have the option of providing text that is unique to each of the selected groups.
|
6. A computer implemented method for segmenting an email addressed to a plurality of original email recipients without the need to send separate emails comprising:
selecting a section of the email;
selecting a recipient for the section from the plurality of recipients;
responsive to selecting the recipient for the section, inserting a section information that identifies the recipient for the section and a starting and an ending character of the section into a header of the email;
sending the email to an email server, the email server comprising a processor and a memory;
at the email server, performing steps including:
receiving the email;
parsing the header for the section information;
sending the email to the recipient for the section;
sending the email without the section and the section information to the plurality of original recipients that have not been selected for receiving the section so that the plurality of original recipients cannot see that the section was removed;
wherein the section information is adapted to automatically prefix the section with an explanatory text to inform the section recipient that the section is being transmitted only to the section recipient, and wherein the explanatory text is adapted to be indented and colored.
1. A computer program product for segmenting an email addressed to a plurality of original email recipients without the need to send separate emails, the computer program product comprising:
a computer readable storage device;
first program instructions for selecting a section of the email;
second program instructions for selecting a recipient for the section from the plurality of recipients;
third program instructions for inserting, responsive to selecting the recipient for the section, a section information that identifies the recipient for the section and a starting and an ending character of the section into a header of the email;
fourth program instructions for sending the email to an email server, the email server comprising a processor and a memory;
fifth program instructions for receiving the email at the email server;
sixth program instructions for parsing, at the email server, the header for the section information;
seventh program instructions for sending, at the email server, the email to the recipient for the section; and
eighth program instructions for sending, at the email server, the email without the section and the section information to the plurality of original recipients that have not been selected for receiving the section so that the plurality of original recipients cannot see that the section was removed;
wherein the first through the eighth program instructions are stored in the computer readable storage device; and
wherein the section information is adapted to automatically prefix the section with an explanatory text to inform the section recipient that the section is being transmitted only to the section recipient, and wherein the explanatory text is adapted to be indented and colored.
11. A data processing system comprising:
a bus;
a communications unit connected to the bus;
a computer readable storage device connected to the bus;
a processor unit connected to the bus and to a computer readable memory;
first program instructions for selecting a section of the email;
second program instructions for selecting a recipient for the section from the plurality of recipients;
third program instructions for responsive to selecting the recipient for the section, inserting a section information that identifies the recipient for the section and a starting and an ending character of the section into a header of the email;
fourth program instructions for sending the email to an email server, the email server comprising a processor and a memory;
fifth program instructions for receiving the email at the email server;
sixth program instructions for parsing, at the email server, the header for the section information;
seventh program instructions for sending, at the email server, the email to the recipient for the section; and
eighth program instructions for sending, at the email server, the email without the section and the section information to the plurality of original recipients that have not been selected for receiving the section so that the plurality of original recipients cannot see that the section was removed;
wherein the first through the eighth program instructions are stored in the computer readable storage device for running via the computer readable memory; and
wherein the section information is adapted to automatically prefix the section with an explanatory text to inform the section recipient that the section is being transmitted only to the section recipient, and wherein the explanatory text is adapted to be indented and colored.
2. The computer program product of
ninth program instructions for displaying, responsive to passing a cursor over the selected section of the email, a window showing a recipient of the selected section;
wherein the ninth program instructions are stored in the computer readable storage device.
3. The computer program product of
4. The computer program product of
tenth program instructions for displaying, responsive to selecting the section of the email, a window having the plurality of recipients for identifying the section recipient of the section;
wherein the tenth program instructions are stored in the computer readable storage device.
5. The computer program product of
7. The computer implemented method of
8. The computer implemented method of
9. The computer implemented method of
10. The computer implemented method of
12. The data processing system of
ninth program instructions for displaying, responsive to passing a cursor over the selected section of the email, a window showing a recipient of the selected section;
wherein the ninth program instructions are stored in the computer readable storage device for running via the computer readable memory.
13. The data processing system of
14. The data processing system of
tenth program instructions for displaying, responsive to selecting the section of the email, a window having the plurality of recipients for identifying the section recipient of the section wherein the tenth program instructions are stored in the computer readable storage device for running via the computer readable memory.
15. The data processing system of
|
This application is related to co-pending a continuation of U.S. utility patent application entitled “System And Method for Sectional E-Mail Transmission” filed on Aug. 19, 2004 and accorded Ser. No. 10/922,249, which is entirely incorporated herein by reference.
This invention is related to the field of electrical computers and digital processing systems to transfer data via one or more communications media in general, and specifically, to a demand-based messaging system for simultaneous transmission of sections of an email to different recipients without the need to send separate emails.
A demand-based messaging system is any communication system that enables a person to exchange electronic messages with another person over a communications media. Demand-based messaging systems typically comprise a network of data processing machines and a messaging program operable on at least one machine to transfer electronic messages over the network to one or more of the other machines. Electronic messages typically are composed of a variety of information, including message data and transmission data. As those terms are used here, “message data” generally refers to the substance of the message, such as text or images, while “transmission data” generally refers to the information required to deliver or respond to the message, such as the correspondents' electronic addresses. Electronic messages also may include status information, such as the time and date that the message was composed, sent, or received.
LOTUS NOTES, MOZILLA, and MICROSOFT OUTLOOK are exemplary messaging programs that enable users to exchange electronic mail messages through networked computers. Instant messaging (“IM”) programs such as MSN MESSENGER and YAHOO! MESSENGER, which have gained popularity in recent years, exemplify another embodiment of messaging programs that enable users to exchange electronic messages in real-time through networked computers.
Electronic mail messages are often sent to a group of recipients. Such recipients fall into three categories: the addressee, the copied recipient, and the recipient who receives a blind copy. The addressee receives the message and sees who has been copied. The recipient who has been copied receives the message and knows to whom the message was directed. The recipient who receives a blind copy receives the message, knows to whom the message was directed and who received copies, but the addressee and the copied recipients do not know the identity of the blind copy recipient.
An originator may want to send a bulk message to all recipients, but a small section unique to each individual recipient. For example, a user may send instructions to coordinate an event, with a unique time assignment to each recipient who receives the email. Sometimes a need arises to vary the message sent to one or more recipients. A sender of an email may not want its entire contents to go to all recipients. Normally, the sender would have to break up the email and send it in segments. Having to send multiple emails wastes the sender's time as well as wastes disk space on the server and bandwidth on the network.
An originator may desire to send an email where only a portion is intended for all recipients, another portion only for select recipients, and a final portion that is not to be sent to certain other recipients. Perhaps the material sent to the select recipients is confidential. The material not to be sent to some recipients may be attachments that are already available to them on their server.
An originator may desire to send an email containing a section of text that is of common interest to all the recipients followed by text that is specific to each recipient. Perhaps the specific text is the recipient's new password. The desire is to send the specific text only to the intended recipient. The common text would go to all recipients.
The need to vary the message can arise with a group of recipients in one status grouping or in more than one status grouping. For example, the sender may want to provide additional information for a recipient who is less familiar with the context of the message than other recipients. Likewise, a user may want to send special instructions to a recipient such as a reminder to a blind copy recipient not to reply because the user does not want the other recipients to know he included the blind copy recipient. Presently, varying message text requires sending separate messages.
Sending separate messages requires time to create the separate electronic messages and to copy and paste the content of the separate messages. Since the messages are sent separately, some of the reply messages will not go to all of the recipients. In particular, reply messages will not go to all recipients when the reply comes from a message sent only to a subset of the overall group of recipients. In order to solve this problem, the sender could include the subset of recipients on both emails. In that event, the subset of recipients receives redundant emails. Sending multiple electronic messages consumes more network bandwidth and storage space. Increased consumption of network bandwidth and storage space increases costs. Costs further increase when the email is large or has large attachments. If an originator of an email had an easy way to segment a single email, the originator would save time as well as network disk storage space and bandwidth. Therefore, a need exits for an improved electronic messaging system that allows transmission of e-mail segments to different recipients.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,118,856 discloses receiving an email and automatically forwarding it to a remote device. The forwarding is done by an act of the recipient, not the sender. The forwarding may be limited to a selective portion of the original email. This patent is primarily concerned with forwarding received emails to a cell phone or a text pager. The forwarding is based on the content of the message. For example, the forwarding may be done based on a particular sender.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,446,118 discloses a system for receiving email while away from your computer without having to subscribe to a “commercial, public network” such as SkyTel. A portion of the email, such as the header, may be all that is transmitted to an email notification device. Other, limited information, like message size and when the message was originally received, may also be transmitted.
The invention that meets the needs described above is a process of segmenting a single email so that portions of it may be directed to or away from select recipients. The sender highlights portions of the email and right clicks (or key command, button, or menu item) and selects an option to select recipients. The operator interface then provides the sender with the option of selecting recipients from their address book or the server's address book. To speed the process along, the sender may select those already on the To, Cc, or Bcc distribution lists. The sender then selects whether those chosen will receive the highlighted portion or if they will be excluded from receiving it. Lastly, the sender will have the option of providing text that is unique to each of the selected groups.
These and other objects of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention.
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objectives and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
A person of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the present invention may be implemented in a variety of software and hardware configurations. It is believed, however, that the invention is described best as a computer program that configures and enables one or more general-purpose computers to implement the novel aspects of the invention.
As used herein, “attachment” means a file that is transmitted with an email that is not part of any messages in the email itself.
As used herein, “blind copy recipient” means a recipient whose identity is not to be disclosed to other recipients of the same message.
As used herein, “computer” means a machine having a processor, a memory, and an operating system, capable of interaction with a user or other computer, and shall include without limitation desktop computers, notebook computers, tablet computers, personal digital assistants (PDAs), servers, handheld computers, and similar devices.
As used herein, “copy recipient” means a recipient for whom a message is not primarily intended but who is included in the distribution list to be kept informed, and may be synonymous with secondary recipient.
As used herein, “electronic mail” or “email” means direct user-to-user transmission of messages between user computers over a network.
As used herein, “electronic messaging” means the creation, transfer, storage, and retrieval of text, graphics, images, or voice data by electronic means.
As used herein, “header” means the portion of a message that contains control information for the message.
As used herein, “recipient” means anyone or any location that receives data, and a user of a demand-based messaging system to whom a message is addressed.
As used herein, “section” means a message or a portion of a message.
As used herein, “message” means an electronic mail message transmitted over a network.
The internal configuration of a computer, including connection and orientation of the processor, memory, and input/output devices, is well known in the art.
In alternative embodiments, SEP 210 can be stored in the memory of other computers. Storing SEP 210, in the memory of other computers allows the processor workload to be distributed across a plurality of processors instead of a single processor. Further configurations of SEP 210 across various multiple memories and processors are known by persons skilled in the art.
Originator 310 normally would create one email to the customers shown in recipient addressee section 322 and create another email to the copy recipient addressees shown in copy recipient address section 324. However, SEP 210 allows originator 310 to create one email and to sectionalize that one email in the following manner.
In order to sectionalize the email, originator 310 highlights first message section 332 and, using a mouse, right clicks (or such other means known to person skilled in the art such as a key command button or menu item) to receive a display of options from which the originator selects “select recipients.” Upon selecting “select recipients” a dialog box appears asking the originator to identify who will receive the section. Referring to
Referring to
Alternatively, upon selection of select recipients window 410 from dialog box 400, a list of all recipients in the recipient address section 322, copy recipient address section 324, and blind copy recipient address section 326 may be presented so that the user can select recipients using drag and drop, highlighting, checkboxes, add/remove buttons, and other means known to persons skilled in the art.
Activation of Select from Address Book 540 means that originator 310's address book will be displayed so that originator 310 can select addressees to receive the highlighted portion of the e-mail, and those selected will be the only ones that will receive the highlighted portion. SEP 210 may be configured to display the user's local or server address book. In addition, originator 310 may add recipients from the address book to names selected from other options in window 500. Activation of Select User Defined 550 means that an entry field window, such as Enter recipient window 600 will appear. Referring to
Once originator 310 makes selections, the email appears in its entirety to originator 310, but the recipients will only receive and be able to read those portions designated for them to receive and read. Originator 310 may review the e-mail by passing the cursor over the various portions of the email. For example, passing the cursor over second section 334, causes second recipient window 700 (see
Since CSEP 220 sends the email to the server with instructions on segmenting the email, and SSEP 240 then segments the email according to the instructions in the header and sends the separate emails to the respective recipients, network bandwidth and storage are conserved.
Once section information has been inserted into the header of the email, a user may hover the mouse over a given section of email and obtain information regarding who received or did not receive that section.
In an additional embodiment, SEP 210 may he configured to block a recipient from replying or forwarding an email that was sent only to that recipient. Such an embodiment may prevent accidental disclosure of information intended only for specified recipients.
In an alternate embodiment, SEP 210 may be employed only in the client computer. In such an embodiment, the client computer segments the email and sends separate emails as provided by the originator. Such an embodiment does not save bandwidth and disk storage space, but it does save the originator's time by automatically preparing the separate messages. In addition, such an embodiment allows for a pure client implementation, at reduced functionality, without requiring a server implementation.
A preferred form of the invention has been shown in the drawings and described above, but variations in the preferred form will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The preceding description is for illustration purposes only, and the invention should not be construed as limited to the specific form shown and described. The scope of the invention should be limited only by the language of the following claims.
Chen, Yen-Fu, Selvage, Mei Yang, Walker, Keith Raymond, Handy-Bosma, John Hans
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10216353, | Apr 30 2002 | Meta Platforms, Inc | E-mail interface having an informational tool tip |
10949053, | Apr 30 2002 | Meta Platforms, Inc | E-mail interface having an informational tooltip |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5694616, | Dec 30 1994 | International Business Machines Corporation; IBM Corporation | Method and system for prioritization of email items by selectively associating priority attribute with at least one and fewer than all of the recipients |
5754778, | Aug 04 1995 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Electronic mail system |
5805830, | Sep 30 1994 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for managing communications with selective subsets of conference participants |
5864684, | May 22 1996 | Oracle America, Inc | Method and apparatus for managing subscriptions to distribution lists |
5878230, | Jan 05 1995 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for email messages wherein the sender designates whether the recipient replies or forwards to addresses also designated by the sender |
5893914, | Dec 11 1990 | C H I DEVELOPMENT MGMT LTD IV, LLC | Interactive computerized document assembly system and method |
5995597, | Jan 21 1997 | E-mail processing system and method | |
6044395, | Sep 03 1997 | EXACTIS COM, INC | Method and apparatus for distributing personalized e-mail |
6052709, | Dec 23 1997 | Symantec Corporation | Apparatus and method for controlling delivery of unsolicited electronic mail |
6061698, | Oct 22 1997 | International Business Machines Corporation | Merging tagged documents and scripts having dynamic content |
6074772, | Jul 21 1995 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | High temperature fuel cell, high temperature fuel cell stack and method for producing a high temperature fuel cell |
6101532, | Jun 27 1997 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Electronic conference system |
6118856, | Dec 28 1998 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Method and apparatus for automatically forwarding an email message or portion thereof to a remote device |
6122632, | Jul 21 1997 | CONCENTRIX CVG CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT DELAWARE LLC | Electronic message management system |
6163809, | Dec 08 1997 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | System and method for preserving delivery status notification when moving from a native network to a foreign network |
6182059, | Apr 03 1997 | BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC | Automatic electronic message interpretation and routing system |
6192396, | Aug 11 1998 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Electronic mail with recipient-specific content |
6205471, | Dec 19 1995 | International Business Machines Corporation | Object oriented mail server framework mechanism |
6246992, | Oct 16 1996 | Health Hero Network | Multiple patient monitoring system for proactive health management |
6247045, | Jun 24 1999 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for sending private messages within a single electronic message |
6275848, | May 21 1997 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for automated referencing of electronic information |
6275850, | Jul 24 1998 | SIEMENS INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, INC | Method and system for management of message attachments |
6289372, | Jul 02 1997 | Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. | Method for transmitting and processing group messages in the e-mail system |
6308179, | Aug 31 1998 | GOOGLE LLC | User level controlled mechanism inter-positioned in a read/write path of a property-based document management system |
6324569, | Sep 18 1999 | Red Hat, Inc | Self-removing email verified or designated as such by a message distributor for the convenience of a recipient |
6332156, | Jul 15 1997 | Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd. | E-mail processing method |
6370567, | Jul 28 1997 | Juniper Networks, Inc | E-mail based workflow systems and methods of distributing e-mail |
6389475, | Jul 31 1997 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Content - based filtering of multicast information |
6393423, | Apr 08 1999 | TUMBLEWEED HOLDINGS LLC | Apparatus and methods for electronic information exchange |
6405243, | Apr 05 1996 | Oracle America, Inc | Method and system for updating email addresses |
6415290, | Jul 21 1997 | Convergys Customer Management Delaware LLC | Electronic massage management system |
6424828, | Jun 03 1999 | CLUSTER, LLC; Optis Wireless Technology, LLC | Internet server and method for providing access to internet e-mail and internet web pages |
6424996, | Nov 25 1998 | Nexsys Electronics | Medical network system and method for transfer of information |
6427076, | Sep 30 1998 | TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET L M ERICSSON PUBL | Method and system for manipulating subscriber data |
6446118, | Feb 29 2000 | BUFFALO PATENTS, LLC | E-mail notification device |
6449635, | Apr 21 1999 | ACOUSTIC, L P | Electronic mail deployment system |
6453337, | Oct 25 1999 | METRICSTREAM, INC | Methods and systems to manage and track the states of electronic media |
6457045, | Aug 30 1999 | METRICSTREAM, INC | System and method for group choice making |
6476930, | Dec 04 1998 | Ricoh Americas Corporation | Output processing and merging of hybrid electronic documents |
6480711, | Sep 15 1998 | NMS Communications Corporation | Method and system for wireless data communication over the internet |
6480885, | Sep 15 1998 | TUMBLEWEED HOLDINGS LLC | Dynamically matching users for group communications based on a threshold degree of matching of sender and recipient predetermined acceptance criteria |
6484196, | Mar 20 1998 | Advanced Web Solutions | Internet messaging system and method for use in computer networks |
6496849, | Aug 30 1999 | METRICSTREAM, INC | Electronic media for communicating information among a group of participants |
6496853, | Jul 12 1999 | Round Rock Research, LLC | Method and system for managing related electronic messages |
6505233, | Aug 30 1999 | METRICSTREAM, INC | Method for communicating information among a group of participants |
6507865, | Aug 30 1999 | METRICSTREAM, INC | Method and system for group content collaboration |
6529942, | Dec 28 1998 | Gateway, Inc | System and method for providing recipient specific formats for electronic mail |
6549957, | Dec 22 1998 | TREND MICRO INCORPORATED | Apparatus for preventing automatic generation of a chain reaction of messages if a prior extracted message is similar to current processed message |
6553425, | Dec 15 1999 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | System and method for breadth first asynchronous expansion of distribution lists with throttling |
6563912, | Mar 02 1999 | TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC | System and method for providing integrated messaging |
6563913, | Aug 21 2000 | Adrea, LLC | Selective sending of portions of electronic content |
6574671, | Mar 02 1999 | Lenovo PC International | Granular assignation of importance to multiple-recipient electronic communication |
6578025, | Jun 11 1999 | ABUZZ TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Method and apparatus for distributing information to users |
6584564, | Apr 25 2000 | Proofpoint, Inc | Secure e-mail system |
6615241, | Jul 18 1998 | Net Exchange, LLC | Correspondent-centric management email system uses message-correspondent relationship data table for automatically linking a single stored message with its correspondents |
6643684, | Oct 08 1998 | SNAP INC | Sender- specified delivery customization |
6668325, | Jun 09 1997 | INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES CORP | Obfuscation techniques for enhancing software security |
6687741, | May 24 2000 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Sending a file as a link and/or as an attachment |
6704772, | Sep 20 1999 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Thread based email |
6705381, | Oct 19 1998 | Adjustable shade unfoldable in multiple directions | |
6721785, | Jun 07 2000 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for directing e-mail to selected recipients by applying transmission control directives on aliases identifying lists of recipients to exclude or include recipients |
6735741, | Jul 30 1999 | GOOGLE LLC | Method system, and program for dynamic resource linking when copies are maintained at different storage locations |
6745197, | Mar 19 2001 | NUIX NORTH AMERICA INC | System and method for efficiently processing messages stored in multiple message stores |
6751453, | Jan 23 2001 | UNWIRED PLANET IP MANAGER, LLC; Unwired Planet, LLC | Seamless message retrieval and transmittal during wireless application protocol session |
6775689, | Jun 07 2000 | KYNDRYL, INC | System for restructuring selected parts of email messages prior to transmission to plurality of recipients |
6789107, | May 03 2000 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing a view of an electronic mail message |
6802067, | Oct 27 2000 | SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L P | Computer software framework and method for logging messages |
6816868, | Aug 31 1999 | Obun Insatsu Co., Ltd.; Masamichi Sugahara | Database system |
6820081, | Mar 19 2001 | NUIX NORTH AMERICA INC | System and method for evaluating a structured message store for message redundancy |
6823368, | Sep 28 2000 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for E-mail sender chain history by adding a sender-chain filed to the E-mail header when forwarding a chain forwarded E-mail message to another recipient |
6826596, | Sep 07 1999 | Roy Satoshi, Suzuki | System for categorizing and displaying reply messages in computer facilitated discussions |
6886030, | Aug 18 1998 | Rovi Guides, Inc; UV CORP ; TV GUIDE, INC | Electronic mail system employing a low bandwidth link for e-mail notifications |
6925605, | Dec 28 2000 | International Business Machines Corporation | Collating table for email |
6970907, | Nov 16 2000 | SNAP INC | Method and system for e-mail chain group discussions |
6972861, | Jun 07 1999 | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY L P | Automated content handling system and related methods |
6993573, | Jun 06 2003 | NM, LLC | Automatic access of internet content with a camera-enabled cell phone |
7039678, | Sep 07 2000 | Malikie Innovations Limited | E-mail proxy |
7062536, | Oct 10 2002 | SNAP INC | Grouping electronic reply messages |
7103634, | Nov 16 2000 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for e-mail chain group |
7107518, | Apr 03 2001 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Automating a document review cycle |
7111046, | Dec 03 2001 | NTT DoCoMo, Inc | Method and apparatus for processing plural divided e-mails |
7130885, | Sep 05 2000 | METRICSTREAM, INC | Methods and apparatus providing electronic messages that are linked and aggregated |
7130887, | Apr 18 2002 | RATEZE REMOTE MGMT L L C | Method and system for generating separate e-mail transmissions to copied recipients for providing additional information |
7136180, | Dec 05 2000 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Method and apparatus for email-based printer |
7136897, | Aug 22 2000 | International Business Machines Corporation | Minimizing electronic mailbox congestion |
7155481, | Jan 31 2000 | Commvault Systems, Inc. | Email attachment management in a computer system |
7219129, | Nov 28 2001 | Mail program for processing multiple email messages | |
7222156, | Jan 25 2001 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Integrating collaborative messaging into an electronic mail program |
7243125, | Dec 08 2000 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for presenting e-mail threads as semi-connected text by removing redundant material |
7257610, | Oct 17 2001 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Systems and methods for sending coordinated notifications |
7275214, | Feb 06 2001 | GOOGLE LLC | Method of setting destinations of electronic mail |
7305381, | Sep 14 2001 | RICOH CO , LTD | Asynchronous unconscious retrieval in a network of information appliances |
7305430, | Aug 01 2002 | International Business Machines Corporation | Reducing data storage requirements on mail servers |
7305436, | May 17 2002 | SAP SE | User collaboration through discussion forums |
7328241, | Jan 04 2002 | GOOGLE LLC | Dynamic visualization of electronic mail propagation |
7363490, | Sep 12 2002 | TREND MICRO INCORPORATED | Method and system for selective email acceptance via encoded email identifiers |
7375835, | Oct 29 2001 | Ricoh Co., Ltd. | E-mail transmission of print-ready documents |
7383305, | Oct 09 2003 | Vodafone Group PLC | Method, system, and storage medium for providing search and reference functions for a messaging system |
7596603, | Jun 30 2004 | SNAP INC | Automatic email consolidation for multiple participants |
7801960, | Aug 31 2000 | Clearswift Limited | Monitoring electronic mail message digests |
7844676, | Jan 31 2000 | Commvault Systems, Inc. | Email attachment management in a computer system |
7890593, | Jul 17 2008 | KYNDRYL, INC | Sectional E-mail Transmission |
8131806, | Jun 30 2004 | SNAP INC | Automatic email consolidation for multiple participants |
8214444, | Jan 31 2000 | Commvault Systems, Inc. | Email attachment management in a computer system |
8631077, | Jul 22 2004 | SNAP INC | Duplicate e-mail content detection and automatic doclink conversion |
20010047389, | |||
20020019827, | |||
20020029247, | |||
20020046250, | |||
20020052923, | |||
20020097414, | |||
20020097850, | |||
20020099777, | |||
20020107930, | |||
20020120702, | |||
20020122411, | |||
20020138582, | |||
20020138586, | |||
20020188683, | |||
20020193986, | |||
20030014490, | |||
20030018731, | |||
20030061111, | |||
20030070077, | |||
20030088704, | |||
20030093483, | |||
20030097414, | |||
20030101412, | |||
20030115271, | |||
20030195933, | |||
20030200272, | |||
20030223554, | |||
20030229900, | |||
20040006599, | |||
20040024810, | |||
20040034688, | |||
20040064515, | |||
20040068544, | |||
20040073616, | |||
20040078452, | |||
20040139480, | |||
20040141004, | |||
20040221295, | |||
20040260756, | |||
20050021637, | |||
20050038804, | |||
20050039048, | |||
20050060372, | |||
20050080853, | |||
20050108351, | |||
20050138109, | |||
20050138133, | |||
20050165740, | |||
20050223061, | |||
20050267944, | |||
20050278426, | |||
20050289113, | |||
20060020668, | |||
20060031324, | |||
20060041624, | |||
20060041625, | |||
20060168044, | |||
20070036301, | |||
20070110103, | |||
20070143431, | |||
20070214216, | |||
20070300153, | |||
20080281823, | |||
20090012984, | |||
20090276732, | |||
20090319506, | |||
20100017408, | |||
20100017481, | |||
20100070584, | |||
20100077323, | |||
20100106788, | |||
20110072097, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 14 2013 | International Business Machines Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Sep 30 2021 | International Business Machines Corporation | KYNDRYL, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 057885 | /0644 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 26 2014 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Feb 16 2015 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Feb 16 2015 | M1554: Surcharge for Late Payment, Large Entity. |
Oct 08 2018 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Dec 31 2018 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Dec 31 2018 | M1555: 7.5 yr surcharge - late pmt w/in 6 mo, Large Entity. |
Aug 02 2022 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 07 2017 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 07 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 07 2018 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 07 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 07 2021 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 07 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 07 2022 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 07 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 07 2025 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 07 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 07 2026 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 07 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |