A method of enhancing the dewatering of a paper sheet on a paper machine comprising adding to the paper sheet about 0.05 lb/ton to about 15 lb/ton, based on dry fiber, of one or more aldehyde functionalized polymers comprising amino or amido groups wherein at least about 15 mole percent of the amino or amido groups are functionalized by reacting with one or more aldehydes and wherein the aldehyde functionalized polymers have a molecular weight of at least about 100,000.
|
0. 22. A method of enhancing the press section dewatering of a paper sheet on a paper machine comprising adding to the paper sheet about 0.05 lb/ton to about 15 lb/ton, based on dry fiber, of a composition comprising (i) one or more aldehyde functionalized polymers comprising amino or amido groups wherein 22 to 30 mole percent of the amino or amido groups are functionalized by reacting with one or more aldehydes and wherein the aldehyde functionalized polymers have a weight average molecular weight of at least about 300,000 g/mole and (ii) at least about 70 to 80 mole percent unreacted aldehyde, wherein the amount of unreacted aldehyde is based on an amount used to functionalize the amino or amido groups.
1. A method of enhancing the press section dewatering of a paper sheet on a paper machine comprising adding to the paper sheet about 0.05 lb/ton to about 15 lb/ton, based on dry fiber, of a composition comprising (i) one or more aldehyde functionalized polymers comprising amino or amido groups wherein greater than 20 mole percent of the amino or amido groups are functionalized by reacting with one or more aldehydes and wherein the aldehyde functionalized polymers have a weight average molecular weight of at least about 300,000 g/mole and (ii) at least about 60 70 to 80 mole percent unreacted aldehyde, wherein the amount of unreacted aldehyde is based on an amount used to functionalize the amino or amido groups.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
6. The method of
7. The method of
8. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
11. The method of
12. The method of
13. The method of
14. The method of
15. The method of
16. The method of
17. The method of
18. The method of
19. The method of
20. The method of
21. The method of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
“Halogen” means fluorine, chlorine, bromine or iodine.
“Monomer” means a polymerizable allylic, vinylic or acrylic compound. The monomer may be anionic, cationic, nonionic or zwitterionic. Vinyl monomers are preferred, acrylic monomers are more preferred.
Representative non-ionic, water-soluble monomers include acrylamide, methacrylamide, N,N-dimethylacrylamide, N,N-diethylacrylamide, N-isopropylacrylamide, N-vinylformamide, N-vinylmethylacetamide, N-vinyl pyrrolidone, hydroxyethyl methacrylate, hydroxyethyl acrylate, hydroxypropyl acrylate, hydroxypropyl methacrylate, N-t-butylacrylamide, N-methylolacrylamide, vinyl acetate, vinyl alcohol, and the like.
Representative anionic monomers include acrylic acid, and its salts, including, but not limited to sodium acrylate, and ammonium acrylate, methacrylic acid, and its salts, including, but not limited to sodium methacrylate, and ammonium methacrylate, 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid (AMPS), the sodium salt of AMPS, sodium vinyl sulfonate, styrene sulfonate, maleic acid, and its salts, including, but not limited to the sodium salt, and ammonium salt, sulfonate, itaconate, sulfopropyl acrylate or methacrylate or other water-soluble forms of these or other polymerisable carboxylic or sulphonic acids. Sulfomethylated acrylamide, allyl sulfonate, sodium vinyl sulfonate, itaconic acid, acrylamidomethylbutanoic acid, fumaric acid, vinylphosphonic acid, vinylsulfonic acid, allylphosphonic acid, sulfomethylated acrylamide, phosphonomethylated acrylamide, itaconic anhydride, and the like.
Representative cationic monomers include allyl amine, vinyl amine, dialkylaminoalkyl acrylates and methacrylates and their quaternary or acid salts, including, but not limited to, dimethylaminoethyl acrylate methyl chloride quaternary salt (DMAEA.MCQ), dimethylaminoethyl acrylate methyl sulfate quaternary salt, dimethyaminoethyl acrylate benzyl chloride quaternary salt, dimethylaminoethyl acrylate sulfuric acid salt, dimethylaminoethyl acrylate hydrochloric acid salt, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate methyl chloride quaternary salt, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate methyl sulfate quaternary salt, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate benzyl chloride quaternary salt, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate sulfuric acid salt, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate hydrochloric acid salt, dialkylaminoalkylacrylamides or methacrylamides and their quaternary or acid salts such as acrylamidopropyltrimethylammonium chloride, dimethylaminopropyl acrylamide methyl sulfate quaternary salt, dimethylaminopropyl acrylamide sulfuric acid salt, dimethylaminopropyl acrylamide hydrochloric acid salt, methacrylamidopropyltrimethylammonium chloride, dimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide methyl sulfate quaternary salt, dimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide sulfuric acid salt, dimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide hydrochloric acid salt, diethylaminoethylacrylate, diethylaminoethylmethacrylate, diallyldiethylammonium chloride and diallyldimethyl ammonium chloride (DADMAC). Alkyl groups are generally C1-4 alkyl.
“Zwitterionic monomer” means a polymerizable molecule containing cationic and anionic (charged) functionality in equal proportions, so that the molecule is net neutral overall. Representative zwitterionic monomers include N,N-dimethyl-N-acryloyloxyethyl-N-(3-sulfopropyl)-ammonium betaine, N,N-dimethyl-N-acrylamidopropyl-N-(2-carboxymethyl)-ammonium betaine, N,N-dimethyl-N-acrylamidopropyl-N-(3-sulfopropyl)-ammonium betaine, N,N-dimethyl-N-acrylamidopropyl-N-(2-carboxymethyl)-ammonium betaine, 2-(methylthio)ethyl methacryloyl-S-(sulfopropyl)-sulfonium betaine, 2-[(2-acryloylethyl)dimethylammonio]ethyl 2-methyl phosphate, 2-(acryloyloxyethyl)-2′-(trimethylammonium)ethyl phosphate, [(2-acryloylethyl)dimethylammonio]methyl phosphonic acid, 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC), 2-[(3-acrylamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]ethyl 2′-isopropyl phosphate (AAPI), 1-vinyl-3-(3-sulfopropyl)imidazolium hydroxide, (2-acryloxyethyl) carboxymethyl methylsulfonium chloride, 1-(3-sulfopropyl)-2-vinylpyridinium betaine, N-(4-sulfobutyl)-N-methyl-N,N-diallylamine ammonium betaine (MDABS), N,N-diallyl-N-methyl-N-(2-sulfoethyl)ammonium betaine, and the like.
“Papermaking process” means a method of making paper products from pulp comprising forming an aqueous cellulosic papermaking furnish, draining the furnish to form a sheet and drying the sheet. The steps of forming the papermaking furnish, draining and drying may be carried out in any conventional manner generally known to those skilled in the art. Conventional microparticles, alum, cationic starch or a combination thereof may be utilized as adjuncts with the polymer treatment of this invention, though it must be emphasized that no adjunct is required for effective dewatering activity.
The aldehyde-functionalized polymers according to this invention are prepared by reacting a polymer comprising amino or amido groups with one or more aldehydes. The polymer comprising amino or amide groups can have various architectures including linear, branched, star, block, graft, dendrimer, and the like.
Preferred polymers comprising amino or amido groups include polyamines and polyamides. The polyamides and polyamides may be prepared by copolymerizing monomers under free radical forming conditions using any number of techniques including emulsion polymerization, dispersion polymerization and solution polymerization.
Polyamines may also be prepared by modification of a pre-formed polyamide, for example by hydrolysis of acrylamide-vinylformamide copolymer using acid or base as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,610,209 and 6,426,383.
Polyaminoamides may also be prepared by direct amidation of polyalkyl carboxylic acids and transamidation of copolymers containing carboxylic acid and (meth)acrylamide units as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,919,821.
“Emulsion polymer” and “latex polymer” mean a polymer emulsion comprising an aldehyde-functionalized polymer according to this invention in the aqueous phase, a hydrocarbon oil for the oil phase and a water-in-oil emulsifying agent. Inverse emulsion polymers are hydrocarbon continuous with the water-soluble polymers dispersed within the hydrocarbon matrix. The inverse emulsion polymers are then “inverted” or activated for use by releasing the polymer from the particles using shear, dilution, and, generally, another surfactant. See U.S. Pat. No. 3,734,873, incorporated herein by reference. Representative preparations of high molecular weight inverse emulsion polymers are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,982,749; 3,284,393; and 3,734,873. See also, Hunkeler, et al., “Mechanism, Kinetics and Modeling of the Inverse-Microsuspension Homopolymerization of Acrylamide,” Polymer, vol. 30(1), pp 127-42 (1989); and Hunkeler et al., “Mechanism, Kinetics and Modeling of Inverse-Microsuspension Polymerization 2. Copolymerization of Acrylamide with Quaternary Ammonium Cationic Monomers,” Polymer, vol. 32(14), pp 2626-40 (1991).
The aqueous phase is prepared by mixing together in water one or more water-soluble monomers, and any polymerization additives such as inorganic salts, chelants, pH buffers, and the like.
The oil phase is prepared by mixing together an inert hydrocarbon liquid with one or more oil soluble surfactants. The surfactant mixture should have a low hydrophilic-lypophilic balance (HLB), to ensure the formation of an oil continuous emulsion. Appropriate surfactants for water-in-oil emulsion polymerizations, which are commercially available, are compiled in the North American Edition of McCutcheon's Emulsifiers & Detergents. The oil phase may need to be heated to ensure the formation of a homogeneous oil solution.
The oil phase is then charged into a reactor equipped with a mixer, a thermocouple, a nitrogen purge tube, and a condenser. The aqueous phase is added to the reactor containing the oil phase with vigorous stirring to form an emulsion. The resulting emulsion is heated to the desired temperature, purged with nitrogen, and a free-radical initiator is added. The reaction mixture is stirred for several hours under a nitrogen atmosphere at the desired temperature. Upon completion of the reaction, the water-in-oil emulsion polymer is cooled to room temperature, where any desired post-polymerization additives, such as antioxidants, or a high HLB surfactant (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,734,873) may be added.
The resulting emulsion polymer is a free-flowing liquid. An aqueous solution of the water-in-oil emulsion polymer can be generated by adding a desired amount of the emulsion polymer to water with vigorous mixing in the presence of a high-HLB surfactant (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,734,873).
“Dispersion polymer” polymer means a water-soluble polymer dispersed in an aqueous continuous phase containing one or more organic or inorganic salts and/or one or more aqueous polymers. Representative examples of dispersion polymerization of water-soluble polymers in an aqueous continuous phase can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,605,970; 5,837,776; 5,985,992; 4,929,655; 5,006,590; 5,597,859; and 5,597,858 and in European Patent Nos. 183,466; 657,478; and 630,909.
In a typical procedure for preparing a dispersion polymer, an aqueous solution containing one or more inorganic or organic salts, one or more water-soluble monomers, any polymerization additives such as processing aids, chelants, pH buffers and a water-soluble stabilizer polymer is charged to a reactor equipped with a mixer, a thermocouple, a nitrogen purging tube, and a water condenser. The monomer solution is mixed vigorously, heated to the desired temperature, and then a free radical initiator is added. The solution is purged with nitrogen while maintaining temperature and mixing for several hours. After this time, the mixture is cooled to room temperature, and any post-polymerization additives are charged to the reactor. Water continuous dispersions of water-soluble polymers are free flowing liquids with product viscosities generally 100-10,000 cP, measured at low shear.
In a typical procedure for preparing solution polymers, an aqueous solution containing one or more water-soluble monomers and any additional polymerization additives such as chelants, pH buffers, and the like, is prepared. This mixture is charged to a reactor equipped with a mixer, a thermocouple, a nitrogen purging tube and a water condenser. The solution is mixed vigorously, heated to the desired temperature, and then one or more free radical polymerization initiators are added. The solution is purged with nitrogen while maintaining temperature and mixing for several hours. Typically, the viscosity of the solution increases during this period. After the polymerization is complete, the reactor contents are cooled to room temperature and then transferred to storage. Solution polymer viscosities vary widely, and are dependent upon the concentration and molecular weight of the active polymer component.
The polymerization reactions are initiated by any means which results in generation of a suitable free-radical. Thermally derived radicals, in which the radical species results from thermal, homolytic dissociation of an azo, peroxide, hydroperoxide and perester compound are preferred. Especially preferred initiators are azo compounds including 2,2′-azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride, 2,2′-azobis[2-(2-imidazolin-2-yl)propane]dihydrochloride, 2,2′-azobis(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN), 2,2′-azobis(2,4-dimethylvaleronitrile) (AIVN), and the like.
The polymerization processes can be carried out as a batch process or in steps. In a batch process, all of the reactive monomers are reacted together, whereas in a step or semi-batch process, a portion of the reactive monomer is withheld from the main reaction and added over time to affect the compositional drift of the copolymer or the formation of the dispersion particles.
The polymerization and/or post polymerization reaction conditions are selected such that the resulting polymer comprising amino or amido groups has a molecular weight of at least about 1,000 g/mole, preferably about 2,000 to about 10,000,000 g/mole.
The polymer comprising amino or amido groups is then functionalized by reaction with one or more aldehydes. Suitable aldehydes include any compound containing at least one aldehyde (—CHO) functional group having sufficient reactivity to react with the amino or amido groups of the polymer. Representative aldehydes include formaldehyde, paraformaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, glyoxal, and the like. Glyoxal is preferred.
The aldehyde-functionalized polymer is prepared by reacting the polyamide or polyamine with aldehyde at a pH between 4 to 12. The total concentration of polymer backbone plus aldehyde is between about 5 to about 35 weight percent. Generally, an aqueous solution of the polymer backbone is prepared for better reaction rate control and increased product stability. The pH of the aqueous polymer backbone solution is increased to between about 4 to about 12. The reaction temperature is generally about 20 to about 80° C. preferably about 20 to about 40° C. An aqueous aldehyde solution is added to the aqueous polymer backbone solution with good mixing to prevent gel formation. After the addition of aldehyde the pH is adjusted to about 4 to about 12 to achieve the desired reaction rate. After the adjustment of the pH generally the amount of monoreacted amide/amine is optimum for the given ratio of aldehyde to amide/amine and the amount of direacted amide/amine is low. The rate of viscosity increase is monitored during the reaction using a Brookfield viscometer. A viscosity increase of 0.5 cps indicates an increase in polymer molecular weight and an increase in the amount of direacted amide/amine. The amount of monoreacted amide/amine is generally maintained during the viscosity increase but the amount of direacted amide/amine increases with viscosity. Generally, the desired viscosity increase corresponds to a desired level of monoreacted amide/amine, direacted amide/amine and molecular weight. The rate of reaction depends on the temperature, total concentration of polymer and aldehyde, the ratio of aldehyde to amide/amine functional groups and pH. Higher rates of glyoxylation are expected when the temperature, total concentration of polymer and aldehyde, the ratio of aldehyde to amide/amine functional groups or pH is increased. The rate of reaction can be slowed down by decreasing the total concentration of polymer and aldehyde, temperature, the ratio of aldehyde to amide/amine functional groups or pH (to between about 2 to about 3.5). The amount of unreacted aldehyde at the end of the reaction increases as the ratio of aldehyde to amide/amine functional groups is increased. However, the total amount of monoreacted and direacted amide/amine becomes larger.
For example, reaction of a 95/5 mole percent diallyldimethylammonium chloride/acrylamide copolymer with glyoxal in a molar ratio of 0.4 to 1 glyoxal to acrylamide results in a 95/5 mole percent acrylamide/DADMAC copolymer with about 15 to 23 mole percent monoreacted and direacted acrylamide and with about 60 to 70 mole percent total unreacted glyoxal at the target product viscosity and molecular weight. A molar ratio of 0.8 to 1 glyoxal to acrylamide results in a 95/5 mole percent acrylamide/DADMAC copolymer with about 22 to 30 mole percent monoreacted and direacted acrylamide and with about 70 to 80 mole percent total unreacted glyoxal at the target product viscosity and molecular weight.
The product shelf stability depends on the storage temperature, product viscosity, total amount of reacted amide/amine, total concentration of polymer and aldehyde, the ratio of aldehyde to amide/amine functional groups and pH. Generally, the pH of the product is maintained at a low pH (2 to 3.5) and the total concentration of polymer and aldehyde is optimized to extend shelf stability.
The reaction conditions are selected such that at least about 15 mole percent, preferably at least about 20 mole percent of the amino or amido groups in the polymer react with the aldehyde to form the aldehyde-functionalized polymer. The resulting aldehyde-functionalized polymers have a weight average molecular weight of at least about 100,000 g/mole, preferably at least about 300,000 g/mole.
In a preferred aspect of this invention, the aldehyde functionalized polymer is an aldehyde functionalized polyamide.
In another preferred aspect, the aldehyde functionalized polyamide is an aldehyde-functionalized polymer comprising 100 mole percent of one or more nonionic monomers.
In another preferred aspect, the aldehyde functionalized polyamide is an aldehyde functionalized copolymer comprising about 5 to about 99 mole percent of one or more acrylamide monomers and about 95 mole percent to about 1 mole percent of one or more cationic, anionic or zwitterionic monomers, or a mixture thereof.
Copolymers prepared from nonionic monomers and cationic monomers preferably have a cationic charge of about 1 to about 50 mole percent, more preferably from about 1 to about 30 mole percent.
Copolymers prepared from nonionic monomers and anionic monomers preferably have an anionic charge of about 1 to about 50 mole percent, more preferably from about 1 to about 30 mole percent.
Amphoteric polymers preferably have an overall positive charge. Preferred amphoteric polymers are composed of up to about 40 mole percent cationic monomers and up to about 20 mole percent anionic monomers. More preferred amphoteric polymers comprise about 5 to about 10 mole percent cationic monomers and about 0.5 to about 4 mole percent anionic monomers.
Zwitterionic polymers preferably comprise 1 to about 95 mole percent, preferably 1 to about 50 mole percent zwitterionic monomers.
In a preferred aspect of this invention the aldehyde-functionalized polyamide is an aldehyde functionalized copolymer comprising about 1 to about 99 mole percent of one or more acrylamide monomers and about 99 mole percent to about 1 mole percent of one or more cationic, anionic or zwitterionic monomers, or a mixture thereof.
In another preferred aspect, the aldehyde functionalized polyamide is an aldehyde functionalized copolymer comprising about 50 to about 99 mole percent of one or more acrylamide monomers and about 50 to about 1 mole percent of one or more cationic monomers.
In another preferred aspect, the aldehyde functionalized polymer is a copolymer comprising about 50 to about 99 mole percent of one or more acrylamide monomers and about 50 to about 1 mole percent of one or more cationic monomers wherein the copolymer is functionalized with glyoxal.
In another preferred aspect, the cationic monomer is a diallyl-N,N-disubstituted ammonium halide monomer.
In another preferred aspect, about 20 to about 50 mole percent of the amide groups of the copolymer have reacted with glyoxal.
In another preferred aspect, the nonionic monomer is acrylamide and the diallyl-N,N-disubstituted ammonium halide monomer is diallyldimethylammonium chloride.
In another preferred aspect, the functionalized polymer is a copolymer comprising about 70 to about 99 mole percent of acrylamide and about 1 to about 30 mole percent of diallyldimethylammonium chloride functionalized with glyoxal.
In another preferred aspect, about 20 to about 26 mole percent of the amide groups of the copolymer have reacted with glyoxal.
The aldehyde-functionalized polymers are useful for dewatering all grades of paper and paperboard with board grades and fine paper grades being preferred. Recycle board grades using OCC (old corrugated containers) with or without mixed waste have been particularly responsive.
Useful increases in dewatering can be achieved with aldehyde-functionalized polymer doses in the range 0.05 to 15.0 lb polymer/ton of dry fiber with best results normally achieved in the range 0.5 to 3.0 lb/ton depending on the particular papermaking circumstances (papermachine equipment and papermaking raw materials used).
The aldehyde functionalized polymers of the invention can be added in traditional wet end locations used for conventional wet end additives. These include to thin stock or thick stock. The actual wet end location is not considered to be critical, but the aldehyde-functionalized polymers are preferably added prior to the addition of other cationic additives. Because the aldehyde-functionalized polymers are believed to act as pressing aids, their addition to the wet end is not necessary, and the option of adding them just prior to the press section after the formation of the sheet can also be practiced. For example, the polymer can be sprayed on the wet web prior to entering the press section, and this can be a preferred mode of addition to reduce dosages or the effects of interferences which might occur in the wet end. Other traditional wet end additives can be used in combination with the aldehyde functionalized polymers. These include retention aids, strength additives such as starches, sizing agents, and the like.
When using aldehyde-functionalized polymers as described herein having net anionic charge, a method of fixing the polymer to the fiber is needed. This fixing is typically accomplished by using cationic materials in conjunction with the polymers. Such cationic materials are most frequently coagulants, either inorganic (e.g. alum, polyaluminum chlorides, iron chloride or sulfate, and any other cationic hydrolyzing salt) or organic (e.g. p-DADMACs, EPI/DMAs, PEIs, modified PEIs or any other high charged density low to medium molecular weight polymers). Additionally, cationic materials added for other purposes like starch, wet strength, or retention additives can also serve to fix the anionic polymer. No additional additives are needed to fix cationic aldehyde-functionalized polymers to the filler.
The foregoing may be better understood by reference to the following examples, which are presented for purposes of illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
To a 1500-mL reaction flask fitted with a mechanical stirrer, thermocouple, condenser, nitrogen purge tube, and addition port is added 116.4 g of deionized or soft water, 26.3 g of phosphoric acid, 63.8 g of a 62% aqueous solution of diallyldimethyl ammonium chloride (Nalco Company, Naperville, Ill.), 7.6 g of sodium formate, and 0.09 g of ethylene-diaminetetraacetic acid, tetra sodium salt. The reaction mixture is stirred at 400 rpm and the pH adjusted to 4.7 to 4.9 using 17.3 g of aqueous 50% sodium hydroxide solution. The resulting mixture is heated to 100° C. and purged with nitrogen at 50 mL/min. Upon reaching 100° C., 17.6 g of a 25.0% aqueous solution of ammonium persulfate is added to the reaction mixture over a period of 135 minutes. Five minutes after starting the ammonium persulfate addition, 750.9 g of a 49.5% aqueous solution of acrylamide is added to the reaction mixture over a period of 120 minutes. The reaction is held at 100° C. for 180 minutes after ammonium persulfate addition. The reaction mixture is then cooled to ambient temperature and the pH is adjusted to 5.2 to 5.8 using 50% aqueous sodium hydroxide solution or concentrated sulfuric acid. The product is a viscous, clear to amber solution. The product has a molecular weight of about 20,000 g/mole.
Glyoxylation of 95/5 Mole % Acrylamide/DADMAC Copolymer with 0.8 to 1 Glyoxal to Acrylamide Mole Ratio at 9.0% Actives (Total Glyoxal and Polymer).
To a 2000-mL reaction flask fitted with a mechanical stirrer, thermocouple, condenser, addition port and sampling valve at the bottom of the reactor is added 238.0 g of a 41% aqueous solution of 95/5 mole % acrylamide/DADMAC copolymer, prepared as in Example 1, and 1304.0 g of deionized or soft water. The polymer solution is stirred at 400 rpm. The pH of the solution is adjusted to 8.8 to 9.1 by adding 5.8 g of 50% aqueous sodium hydroxide solution. The reaction temperature is set at 24 to 26° C. Glyoxal (143.0 g of a 40% aqueous solution) is added to the reaction mixture over 20 to 30 minutes. The Brookfield viscosity (Brookfield Programmable LVDV-II+ Viscometer, LV # 1 spindle at 60 rpm, Brookfield Engineering Laboratories, Inc, Middleboro, Mass.) of the reaction mixture is about 4 to 5 cps after glyoxal addition. The pH of the reaction mixture is adjusted to 7.5 to 8.8 using 10% aqueous sodium hydroxide (25 g) added over 20 to 30 minutes. The Brookfield viscosity (Brookfield Programmable LVDV-II+ Viscometer, LV # 1 spindle at 60 rpm, Brookfield Engineering Laboratories, Inc, Middleboro, Mass.) of the reaction mixture is about 4 to 5 cps after sodium hydroxide addition. The pH of the reaction mixture is maintained at about 7.0 to 8.8 at about 24 to 26° C. with good mixing. The Brookfield viscosity is monitored and upon achieving the desired viscosity increase of greater than or equal to 1 cps (5 to 200 cps, >100,000 g/mole) the pH of the reaction mixture is decreased to 2 to 3.5 by adding sulfuric acid (93%) to substantially decrease the reaction rate. The rate of viscosity increase is dependent on the reaction pH and temperature. The higher the pH of the reaction mixture the faster the rate of viscosity increase. The rate of viscosity increase is controlled by decreasing the pH of the reaction mixture. The product is a clear to hazy, colorless to amber, fluid with a Brookfield viscosity greater than or equal to 5 cps. The resulting product is more stable upon storage when the Brookfield viscosity of the product is less than 40 cps and when the product is diluted with water to lower percent actives. The product can be prepared at higher or lower percent total actives by adjusting the desired target product viscosity. NMR analysis of the samples prepared indicate that about 70 to 80% of the glyoxal is unreacted and 15 to 35 mole percent of the acrylamide units reacted with glyoxal to from monoreacted and direacted acrylamide.
Dewatering Effectiveness of Representative Aldehyde-Functionalized Polymers. The dewatering effects of glyoxalated DADMAC/Acrylamide polymers prepared with glyoxal to acrylamide mole ratios (here after referred to as the G/A ratio) of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 are evaluated through paper machine trials. The relative performance of polymers prepared using the 0.1, 0.2, and 0.8 G/A ratios are compared to the polymer prepared with the 0.4 mole ratio. The trials are run on a dual headbox Fourdrinier papermachine using 100% OCC furnish manufacturing recycle linerboard and corrugating medium. Actual papermachine conditions varied depending on the specific grade of paperboard being made. In all cases, a retention program of polyaluminum chloride fed to the thick stock and a cationic flocculant fed to the thin stock is used. For linerboard grades, ASA sizing fed to the thin stock is also present. The glyoxalated acrylamide polymers are applied through a spray boom to the underside of the top ply prior to meshing with the bottom ply, although earlier trials demonstrated the dewatering effect could also be achieved by wet-end thick or thin stock addition.
The dewatering effect of the polymers is evaluated on the basis of steam pressure changes in the machine dryer section which are provided through the mills DCS (distributive control system) computer system. The sheet moisture at the reel is measured on-line and is maintained by adjustment of the steam pressure (a measure of steam usage or energy consumption). Lower sheet moisture at the reel reflects a lower sheet moisture going into the dryer section or equivalently, better dewatering through the machine sections preceding the dryer section. The lower steam demand, as measured by pressure, then reflects improved dewatering. If the steam pressure in these sections drops to a level where the operator feels comfortable that normal swings in steam demand can be handled, then he will increase the machine speed manually. When changes in polymer type or dose are made, the steam pressure from one of the steam sections is followed closely to see if any change occurs, with proper consideration given to changes in production rates when they occur. The initial effect of a drier sheet is observed by lower percent moisture detected at the reel. However, this drop in percent moisture is short lived because of the automatic regulation leaving only the steam reduction as a permanent reminder of any dewatering effect produced. Many factors other than addition of the aldehyde-functionalized polymer also affect the sheet moisture, but most, like stock changes, occur over a longer time frame than the steam reduction effect caused by the polymer additive, particularly when applied on the table through spray application. Consequently, the steam reduction is a better indicator of polymer dewatering than the average production rate or machine speed, as these measures are more easily confounded with the other factors which effect machine speed.
Comparison of Polymer with a 0.1 G/A Ratio with Polymer Having a 0.4 G/A Ratio.
Comparison of these two polymers is conducted on 42 lb linerboard in the absence of wet-end starch. After a baseline is established with the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer at 2.0 lb/ton, the 0.1 G/A ratio polymer is substituted at 2.2 lb/ton. Almost immediately, the sheet at the reel is consistently observed to be wetter and the steam demand increases to maximum in about 1 hr which necessitates the re-introduction of the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer to prevent slowing down the paper machine. To regain control of the machine, 3 lb/ton of the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer is needed, and its addition results in a dramatic reduction in steam pressure, 12 psi in 15 min. Subsequently, a baseline with the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer is reestablished at 2 lb/ton whereupon substitution with 0.1 G/A ratio polymer at the higher dose of 3.4 lb/ton is initiated. At this much higher dose, the steam pressure progressively increases over a period of about an hour again to the point where it becomes necessary to revert back to the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer to prevent slowing the machine. Again, with the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer added at 3.0 lb/ton the steam pressure is quickly reduced, 12 psi in 15 min. and this reduction could be maintained even when the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer's dose is reduced to 2 lb/ton. The 0.1 G/A ratio polymer could not maintain the steam pressure, and therefore the machine speed, achieved by 0.4 G/A ratio polymer even at a dose 70% higher. No change in the strength specifications for this grade (Mullen and Scott bond) could be detected when the 0.1 G/A ratio polymer is substituted for the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer.
Comparison of Polymer with a 0.2 G/A Ratio with Polymer Having a 0.4 G/A Ratio.
Comparison of these two polymers is conducted on 35 lb linerboard with 5 lb/ton wet-end starch fed to the thick stock. After a baseline is established with the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer at 2.0 lb/ton, the 0.2 G/A ratio polymer is substituted at 2.2 lb/ton. At this dosage, a modest increase in steam pressure of 5 psi is measured over a period of about the hour. Reintroduction of the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer resulted in an immediate decrease in reel moisture and a quick decline in steam pressure of 3 psi in 10 min. Switching back to the 0.2 G/A ratio polymer at 2.2 lb/ton at this point keeps the steam reasonably constant for about an hour with only a 2 psi increase. Again, reintroduction of 2 lb of the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer results in a quick decline in steam pressure of 8 psi in 20 min. indicative of improve dewatering. Based on these results, the 0.2 G/A ratio polymer certainly demonstrates dewatering ability, but even at a 10% increase in dosage, it could not maintain the pressure achievable with the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer. Additionally, unlike the 0.1 G/A ratio polymer, the 0.2 G/A ratio polymer is capable of keeping the machine running at the desired speed although at increased steam demand and dosage relative to the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer. The trial results with these three polymers indicated that the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer gives better dewatering than the 0.2 G/A ratio polymer and it in turn gives better dewatering than the 0.1 G/A ratio polymer. No change in the strength specifications for this grade (STFI) could be detected when the 0.2 G/A ratio polymer is substituted for the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer.
Comparison of Polymer with a 0.8 G/A Ratio with Polymer having a 0.4 G/A Ratio.
Based on the discovery that increasing the G/A ratio in the preparation of the polymers increases dewatering, an even higher G/A ratio of 0.8 is prepared and evaluated on the same papermachine. Comparison of the 0.8 G/A ratio polymer with the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer is conducted on 33 lb corrugating medium in the absence of wet-end starch. Addition of the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer at 2.0 lb/ton results in a very good reduction in steam pressure of 21 psi after about 2 hours at which time 1.5 lb/ton of the 0.8 G/A ratio polymer replaces the 2 lb/ton of 0.4 G/A ratio polymer. Even with the 25% reduction in dose, the addition of the 0.8 G/A ratio polymer results in an even further reduction in steam pressure by 3 psi and a dramatic increase in steam pressure of 12 psi occurs in 0.5 hour when it is removed. Further trialing is conducted on 26 lb corrugating medium in the absence of wet-end starch. Starting again with 2.0 lb/ton of 0.4 G/A ratio polymer to establish the baseline, a substitution of 2.0 lb/ton of 0.8 G/A ratio polymer results in a drop in steam pressure of 7 psi in 60 min., which further decreases by 4 psi when the dosage is increased to 3 lb/ton in 10 min. Reducing the 0.8 G/A ratio polymer to only 1.0 lb/ton relative to the 3 lb/ton results in an increase in steam pressure, but it remains 8 psi below the 2.0 lb/ton 0.4 G/A ratio polymer value even with an increase in machine speed of 30 ft/min. Based on these trial results the 0.8 G/A ratio polymer appears to yield equivalent dewatering at a dose 25 to 50% less than required by the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer. The strength specification for both medium grades (Concorra) made with the 0.8 G/A ratio polymer exhibit values equal to or greater than those obtained with for the 0.4 G/A ratio polymer even though the dosages are generally lower.
Based on these trial results, increasing the G/A ratio in the preparation of the aldehyde-functionalized polymers is found to provide increased dewatering activity with the preferred ratio being greater than 0.4.
Changes can be made in the composition, operation and arrangement of the method of the invention described herein without departing from the concept and scope of the invention as defined in the claims.
St. John, Michael R., Zagala, Angela P.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 10006170, | Aug 06 2015 | Ecolab USA Inc. | Aldehyde-functionalized polymers for paper strength and dewatering |
| 10920065, | Jun 10 2016 | Ecolab USA Inc | Low molecular weight dry powder polymer for use as paper-making dry strength agent |
| 11214926, | Jul 31 2017 | Ecolab USA Inc. | Dry polymer application method |
| 11708481, | Dec 13 2017 | Ecolab USA Inc. | Solution comprising an associative polymer and a cyclodextrin polymer |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 2982749, | |||
| 3284393, | |||
| 3556932, | |||
| 3734873, | |||
| 4603176, | Jun 25 1985 | The Procter & Gamble Company; PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY A CORP OF OH | Temporary wet strength resins |
| 4605702, | Jun 27 1984 | Bayer Corporation; CYTEC | Temporary wet strength resin |
| 4919821, | Mar 21 1986 | Ecolab USA Inc | Modified maleic anhydride polymers and the like for use as scale inhibitors |
| 4929655, | Nov 19 1984 | KYORITSU YUKI CO , LTD , A CO OF JAPAN | Process for production of water-soluble polymer dispersion |
| 5006590, | Oct 14 1988 | Kyoritsu Yuki Co., Ltd. | Process for the preparation of dispersion of water-soluble cationic polymer |
| 5320711, | Dec 19 1988 | Lanxess Corporation | Emulsified mannich acrylamide polymers |
| 5571380, | Jan 08 1992 | Nalco Chemical Company | Papermaking process with improved retention and maintained formation |
| 5597858, | Jun 10 1993 | Ecolab USA Inc | Hydrophobically associating dispersants used in forming polymer dispersions |
| 5597859, | Dec 09 1993 | Ecolab USA Inc | Seed process for salt dispersion polymer |
| 5605970, | Mar 20 1996 | Ecolab USA Inc | Synthesis of high molecular weight anionic dispersion polymers |
| 5654198, | Jun 05 1995 | UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION, THE | Detectable water-treatment polymers and methods for monitoring the concentration thereof |
| 5674362, | Feb 16 1996 | KEMIRA CHEMICALS, INC | Method for imparting strength to paper |
| 5723022, | Jul 11 1996 | KEMIRA OYJ | Temporary wet strength resins |
| 5785813, | Feb 24 1997 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Inc.; Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc | Method of treating a papermaking furnish for making soft tissue |
| 5837776, | Mar 20 1996 | Ecolab USA Inc | Process for producing water soluble anionic dispersion polymers |
| 5985992, | Dec 10 1997 | KEMIRA OYJ | Anionic polymer products and processes |
| 6013708, | Oct 03 1996 | KEMIRA OYJ | Cationic water-soluble polymer precipitation in salt solutions |
| 6077394, | Mar 31 1998 | KEMIRA CHEMICALS, INC | Retention and drainage in alkaline fine paper |
| 6083348, | Dec 27 1996 | BASF Aktiengesellschaft | Method for producing paper |
| 6241853, | Dec 10 1998 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc | High wet and dry strength paper product |
| 6315866, | Feb 29 2000 | Nalco Chemical Company | Method of increasing the dry strength of paper products using cationic dispersion polymers |
| 6426383, | May 28 1997 | Ecolab USA Inc | Preparation of water soluble polymer dispersions from vinylamide monomers |
| 6472487, | Jan 25 1999 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc | Modified vinyl polymers containing amphiphilic hydrocarbon moieties |
| 6610209, | Dec 27 1994 | Ecolab USA Inc | Use of polymers containing vinylamine/vinylformamide for the treatment of food processing wastewater |
| 7901543, | Jan 26 2004 | Nalco Company | Aldehyde-functionalized polymers |
| 20020134521, | |||
| 20040050514, | |||
| 20050187356, | |||
| EP183466, | |||
| EP630909, | |||
| EP657478, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Jul 31 2012 | Nalco Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Jun 15 2017 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
| Jun 23 2021 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Feb 24 2018 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 24 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 24 2019 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Feb 24 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Feb 24 2022 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 24 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 24 2023 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Feb 24 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Feb 24 2026 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 24 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 24 2027 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Feb 24 2029 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |