A driving mass of an integrated microelectromechanical structure is moved with a rotary motion about an axis of rotation, and a sensing mass is connected to the driving mass via elastic supporting elements so as to perform a detection movement in the presence of an external stress. The driving mass is anchored to an anchorage arranged along the axis of rotation by elastic anchorage elements. An opening is provided within the driving mass and the sensing mass is arranged within the opening. The elastic supporting and anchorage elements render the sensing mass fixed to the driving mass in the rotary motion, and substantially decoupled from the driving mass in the detection movement. The detection movement is a rotation about an axis lying in a plane. The sensing mass has, in plan view, a non-rectangular shape; in particular, the sensing mass has a radial geometry and, in plan view, the overall shape of a radial annulus sector.
|
0. 27. A device, comprising:
a substrate;
a driving mass configured to move in a plane above the substrate;
elastic elements; and
non-rectangular first, second, third, and fourth sensing masses coupled to the driving mass by the elastic elements, the first, second, third and fourth sensing masses configured to be driven by the driving mass in the plane and configured to move out of the plane in response to a rotation of the device about one or more rotation axes, the first, second, third and fourth sensing masses having shapes that places a centroid of the sensing masses a first distance from an outer edge of the respective sensing mass and a second distance from an inner edge of the respective sensing mass, the second distance being greater than the first distance.
0. 28. A device, comprising:
an anchor;
a driving assembly having a first set of driving electrodes on a first side of the driving assembly and a second set of driving electrode on a second side of the driving assembly, the anchor being between the first and second set of driving electrodes; and
four non-rectangular sensing masses positioned around the anchor and between the first set of driving electrodes and the second set of driving electrodes, each of the sensing masses configured to be driven by the driving assembly in a plane and configured to move out of the plane in response to a rotation of the device, an inner edge of each sensing mass being smaller than an outer edge of the same sensing mass, the inner edge being proximate to the anchor and the outer edge being proximate to one of the first or second set of driving electrodes.
0. 24. A device, comprising:
a substrate;
a driving mass configured to move in a plane above the substrate;
elastic elements; and
a non-rectangular first sensing mass coupled to the driving mass by the elastic elements, the first sensing mass configured to be driven by the driving mass in the plane and configured to move out of the plane in response to a rotation of the device about a first rotation axis, the first sensing mass having a shape that places a centroid of the first sensing mass a first distance from an outer edge of the sensing mass and a second distance from an inner edge of the first sensing mass, the second distance being greater than the first distance; and
a non-rectangular second sensing mass coupled to the driving mass, the second sensing mass configured to move with the driving mass in the plane and configured to move out of the plane in response to a rotation of the device about a second rotation axis that is perpendicular to the first rotation axis.
17. A microelectromechanical sensor device, comprising:
a driving mass designed to be moved with a rotary motion about an axis of rotation;
an anchorage arranged along said axis of rotation;
elastic anchorage elements anchoring said driving mass to said anchorage;
a first opening provided within said driving mass;
a first sensing mass arranged inside said first opening and having side surfaces enclosed by said driving mass; and
elastic supporting elements connecting the first sensing mass to said driving mass such that the first sensing mass performs a detection movement in the presence of a first external stress, said elastic supporting elements and said elastic anchorage elements being so configured that said first sensing mass is fixed to said driving mass in said rotary motion, and is substantially decoupled from said driving mass in said detection movement; and
a read stage configured to switch a mode of operation of said microelectromechanical structure between a gyroscope mode and an accelerometer mode,
wherein said first sensing mass has, in plan view, a non-rectangular shape.
22. A microelectromechanical gyroscope comprising:
an anchorage;
elastic anchorage elements;
a driving mass operable to move in a rotary motion about an axis of rotation, the driving mass being anchored via the elastic anchorage elements to the anchorage, the anchorage being arranged along the axis of rotation and the driving mass substantially extending in a plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation;
a first opening disposed within the driving mass;
elastic supporting elements;
a first sensing mass disposed within the first opening and coupled to the driving mass via the elastic supporting elements to allow for a detection movement in response to an external stress, the elastic supporting elements and the elastic anchorage elements being configured to fix the first sensing mass to the driving mass, and wherein the elastic anchorage elements are substantially decoupled from the driving mass during the first detection movement, and the first detection movement is a rotational movement about a rotation axis lying in the plane;
wherein said first sensing mass has a radial geometry and, in plan view, the overall shape of a radial annulus sector.
1. An integrated microelectromechanical structure, comprising:
a driving mass designed to be moved with a rotary motion about an axis of rotation configured to move in a plane with a driving motion;
an a central anchorage arranged along said a central axis of rotation the structure;
elastic anchorage elements anchoring elastically coupling said driving mass to said central anchorage;
a first opening provided within said driving mass;
a first sensing mass arranged inside said first opening; and
first and second elastic supporting elements connecting coupling the first sensing mass to said driving mass such that the first sensing mass performs is configured to perform a detection movement out of the plane and along a rotation axis in the presence of a first external stress response to the structure being rotated, said first and second elastic supporting elements and said elastic anchorage elements being so configured so that said first sensing mass is fixed to said driving mass in said rotary driving motion, and is substantially decoupled from said driving mass in said detection movement;
wherein at least one of said first and second elastic supporting elements define a defines said rotation axis for said first sensing mass during said detection movement; and
wherein said first sensing mass has a first edge proximate said rotation axis and a second edge proximate a portion of said driving mass farthest from said rotation axis, said first sensing mass having a shape so configured to have that a centroid that of said first sensing mass is positioned at a distance farther away from said rotation axis than a centroid of any rectangular-shaped sensing mass inscribable in said driving mass and rotatable about said rotation axis said first edge than said second edge.
2. The structure according to
3. The structure according to
4. The structure according to
5. The structure according to
6. The structure according to
7. The structure according to
8. The structure according to
a second sensing mass, which that is aligned with said first sensing mass along a first axis of, said first axis being parallel to said detection lying in said plane and is arranged in a second opening provided within said driving mass axis, said first and second sensing masses being enclosed in overall dimensions located inward of said driving mass in said plane; and
detection means associated with each of said first and second sensing masses for detecting said detection movement, said detection movement being a rotational movement about an axis lying in said plane and perpendicular to said first axis of detection.
9. The structure according to
10. The structure according to
11. The structure according to
a second sensing mass forming with said first sensing mass a first pair of sensing masses, aligned along a first axis of detection lying in a the plane on opposite sides with respect to said anchorage; and
a second pair of sensing masses aligned along a second axis of detection lying in said plane and orthogonal to said first axis of detection, on opposite sides of said anchorage.
12. The structure according to
13. The structure according to
a first external anchorage positioned externally of said driving mass and coupled to a first side of the driving mass by a first external elastic anchorage element; and
a second external anchorage positioned externally of said driving mass and coupled to a second side of the driving mass by a second external elastic anchorage element, the second side being opposite to the first side;
wherein said elastic supporting elements and said first, second and third elastic anchorage elements are so configured that said first sensing mass is fixed to said driving mass in said rotary motion, and is decoupled from said driving mass in said detection movement.
14. The structure according to
15. The structure according to
16. The structure according to
0. 18. The sensor device according to
19. The sensor device according to claim 18 17, wherein said first sensing mass has an arc-shaped outer side.
20. The sensor device according to claim 18 17, wherein said first sensing mass has a radial geometry and, in plan view, the overall shape of a radial annulus sector.
21. The sensor device according to claim 18 17, wherein said driving mass extends substantially in a plane and the sensor device further comprises:
a second sensing mass, which is aligned with said first sensing mass along a first axis of detection lying in said plane and is arranged in a second opening provided within said driving mass, said first and second sensing masses being enclosed in overall dimensions of said driving mass in said plane; and
detection means associated with each of said first and second sensing masses for detecting said detection movement, said detection movement being a rotational movement about an axis lying in said plane and perpendicular to said first axis of detection.
23. The sensor device according to claim 18 17, further comprising:
a second sensing mass, which is aligned with said first sensing mass along a first axis of detection lying in said plane and is arranged in a second opening provided within said driving mass, said first and second sensing masses being enclosed in overall dimensions of said driving mass in said plane; and
detection means associated with each of said first and second sensing masses for detecting said detection movement, said detection movement being a rotational movement about an axis lying in said plane and perpendicular to said first axis of detection.
0. 25. The device according to claim 24 wherein first sensing mass has a non-rectangular shape in the plane.
0. 26. The device according to claim 24 wherein the driving mass includes a plurality of electrodes proximate the outer edge of the sensing mass.
0. 29. The device according to claim 28 wherein the inner edge of each sensing mass is nonlinear.
0. 30. The device according to claim 29 wherein the inner edge of each sensing mass is concave.
0. 31. The device according to claim 28 wherein the inner edge has a first dimension and the outer edge has a second dimension that is greater than the first dimension.
0. 32. The device according to claim 28 wherein the four non-rectangular sensing masses includes a first set of sensing mass and a second set of sensing mass, the first set of sensing masses being configured to move out of the plane in response to the rotation of the device along a first axis, the second set of sensing masses being configured to move out of the plane in response to the rotation of the device along a second axis.
0. 33. The device according to claim 32 wherein the second axis is perpendicular to the first axis.
0. 34. The device according to claim 28 wherein the anchor is a central anchor and the driving assembly further includes a driving mass elastically coupled to the central anchor.
|
1. Technical Field
The present invention relates to a high sensitivity microelectromechanical sensor having a rotary driving motion. In particular, in the following description reference will be made to a gyroscope (whether uniaxial or biaxial), which can possibly operate as an accelerometer (whether uniaxial or biaxial).
2. Description of the Related Art
As is known, microprocessing techniques enable formation of microelectromechanical structures or systems (the so-called MEMS) within layers of semiconductor material, which have been deposited (for example, in the case of a layer of polycrystalline silicon) or grown (for example, in the case of an epitaxial layer) on top of sacrificial layers, which are removed by chemical etching. Inertial sensors, accelerometers and gyroscopes obtained with this technology are encountering an increasing success, for example in the automotive field, in inertial navigation, or in the sector of portable devices.
In particular, integrated semiconductor gyroscopes are known, which are made with MEMS technology. Gyroscopes operate according to the theorem of relative accelerations, exploiting Coriolis acceleration. When an angular velocity is imparted on a movable mass that is moving with a linear velocity, the movable mass “feels” an apparent force, referred to as Coriolis force, which causes a displacement thereof in a direction perpendicular to the direction of the linear velocity and to the axis of rotation. The movable mass is supported via springs that enable a displacement in the direction of the apparent force. According to Hooke's law, the displacement is proportional to the apparent force, and consequently, based on the displacement of the movable mass, it is possible to detect the Coriolis force and the angular velocity that has generated it. The displacement of the movable mass can, for example, be detected capacitively, by measuring, in resonance conditions, the capacitance variations caused by the movement of movable electrodes, integrally fixed to the movable mass and operatively coupled to fixed electrodes.
US2007/214883, assigned to STMicroelectronics Srl, discloses a microelectromechanical integrated sensor with a rotary driving motion, which is sensitive to pitch and roll angular velocities.
This microelectromechanical sensor includes a single driving mass, anchored to a support at a single central point and driven with rotary motion about an axis, which passes through the central point and is orthogonal to the plane of the driving mass. The rotation of the driving mass enables two mutually orthogonal components of driving velocity in the plane of the mass. At least one through-opening is provided inside the driving mass, in which a sensing mass is arranged; the sensing mass is enclosed within the driving mass, suspended with respect to the substrate, and connected to the driving mass via flexible elements. The sensing mass is fixed to the driving mass during its rotary motion, and has a further degree of freedom of movement as a function of an external stress, in particular a Coriolis force acting on the sensor. The flexible elements, according to their particular construction, allow the sensing mass to perform a rotary movement of detection about an axis lying in the plane of the sensor in response to a Coriolis acceleration acting in a direction perpendicular to the plane, in a way substantially decoupled from the driving mass. The microelectromechanical structure, in addition to being compact (in so far as it envisages just one driving mass that encloses in its overall dimensions one or more sensing masses), enables with minor structural modifications, a uniaxial, biaxial or triaxial gyroscope (and/or an accelerometer, according to the electrical connections implemented) to be obtained, at the same time ensuring an excellent decoupling of the driving mass from the sensing mass during the movement of detection.
In detail, and as shown in
The driving mass 3 has a first pair of through-openings 9a, 9b with a substantially rectangular shape elongated in a direction parallel to the second axis y, aligned in a diametric direction along the first axis of symmetry A, and set on opposite sides with respect to the empty space 6; and a second pair of through-openings 9c, 9d, which are aligned along the second axis of symmetry B, have a substantially rectangular shape elongated in a direction parallel to the first axis x, and are arranged on opposite sides with respect to the empty space 6. In particular, the direction of alignment of the through-openings of each pair corresponds to a direction of detection of the microelectromechanical sensor 1 (in the case represented in the figure, coinciding with the first and second axes x,y).
The driving assembly 4 comprises a plurality of driven arms 10 (for example, eight in number), extending externally from the driving mass 3 in a radial direction and spaced apart at a same angular distance, and a plurality of first and second driving arms 12a, 12b, extending parallel to, and on opposite sides of, respective driven arms 10 and anchored to the substrate 2 through respective anchorages. Each driven arm 10 carries a plurality of first electrodes 13, extending in a direction perpendicular to, and on either side of, the same driven arm. Furthermore, each of the first and second driving arms 12a, 12b carries respective second electrodes 14a, 14b, extending towards the respective driven arm 10 and comb-fingered to the corresponding first electrodes 13. The first driving arms 12a are all arranged on the same side of the respective driven arms 10 and are all biased at a first voltage. Likewise, the second driving arms 12b are all arranged on the opposite side of the respective driven arms 10, and are all biased at a second voltage. In a per se known manner which is not described in detail, a driving circuit is connected to the second electrodes 14a, 14b so as to apply the first and second voltages and determine, by means of mutual and alternating attraction of the electrodes, an oscillatory rotary motion of the driving mass 3 about the drive axis, at a given oscillation frequency.
The microelectromechanical sensor 1 further comprises a first pair of acceleration sensors with axis parallel to the orthogonal axis z, and in particular a first pair of sensing masses 16a, 16b, positioned, respectively, within the first through-opening 9a and the second through-opening 9b, so as to be completely enclosed and contained within the overall dimensions of the driving mass 3 in the plane of the sensor xy. The sensing masses 16a, 16b have a generally rectangular shape matching the shape of the respective through-opening 9a, 9b, and are formed by a first rectangular portion 17, which is wider, and by a second rectangular portion 18, which is narrower (along the first axis x), connected by a connecting portion 19, which is shorter (in a direction parallel to the second axis y) than the first and second rectangular portions. Each sensing mass 16a, 16b has a centroid G located within the corresponding first rectangular portion 17, and is supported by a pair of elastic supporting elements 20. The elastic supporting elements 20 are connected to the connecting portion 19, and extend towards the driving mass 3, in a direction parallel to the second axis y. In other words, the elastic supporting elements 20 extend within recesses 21 provided at opposite sides of the sensing masses 16a, 16b. The elastic supporting elements 20 extend at a distance from the centroid G of the respective sensing mass 16a, 16b, and form torsional springs that are rigid for the rotary motion of the driving mass 3, and also enable rotation of the sensing masses about an axis of rotation parallel to the second axis y and lying in the plane of the sensor xy (and, consequently, their movement outside the plane of the sensor xy).
In addition, the microelectromechanical sensor 1 comprises a second pair of acceleration sensors with axis parallel to the orthogonal axis z, and in particular a second pair of sensing masses 16c, 16d housed within the through-openings 9c, 9d, substantially matching their shape, and completely enclosed and contained within the driving mass 3. The sensing masses 16c, 16d are arranged as a result of a 90° rotation of the sensing masses 16a, 16b, and consequently the corresponding elastic supporting elements 20 extend parallel to the first axis x and enable rotation of the respective sensing masses about an axis of rotation parallel to the first axis x.
A pair of first and second detection electrodes 22, 23 is arranged underneath the first and second rectangular portions 17, 18 of each one of the sensing masses 16a-16d; for example the detection electrodes 22, 23 are constituted by regions of polycrystalline silicon formed on the substrate 2, having equal dimensions, substantially corresponding to those of the second rectangular portion 18. The first and second detection electrodes 22, 23 are separated, respectively from the first and second rectangular portions 17, 18, by an air gap, and are connected to a read circuit. The first and second detection electrodes 22, 23 hence form, together with the first and second rectangular portions 17, 18 respective detection capacitors.
In use, the microelectromechanical sensor 1 is able to operate as a biaxial gyroscope, designed to detect an angular velocity {right arrow over (Ω)}x (in
On the hypothesis of small displacements of the sensing masses 16a-16d and of small rotations of the driving mass 3, the rotary movement of the driving mass 3 and of the sensing masses 16a-16d about the drive axis can be represented by a driving-velocity vector {right arrow over (v)}a, linear and tangential to the circumference that describes the driving trajectory.
In particular, the rotary motion about the first axis x at the angular velocity {right arrow over (Ω)}x determines a force acting on the entire structure, known as Coriolis force ({right arrow over (F)}c). In particular, the Coriolis force {right arrow over (F)}c is proportional to the vector product between the angular velocity {right arrow over (Ω)}x and the driving velocity {right arrow over (v)}a, and is hence directed along the orthogonal axis z, is zero in the points where the driving velocity {right arrow over (v)}a is parallel to the first axis x, and, in the points where it does not go to zero, it is directly proportional to the driving velocity {right arrow over (v)}a, and consequently it increases with the distance from the center O. Over the entire structure, considered as a single rigid body, it is hence possible to identify a distribution of Coriolis forces that vary as the distance from the center O varies. The resultants of the Coriolis forces {right arrow over (F)}c acting on the sensing masses 16a, 16b at the corresponding centroid G, cause rotation of the sensing masses, which move out of the plane of the sensor xy, about respective axes parallel to the second axis y and passing through the first elastic supporting elements 20. This movement is allowed by the torsion of the first elastic supporting elements 20. Instead, the configuration of the elastic anchorage elements 8 is such as to inhibit, to a good approximation, movement of the driving mass 3 out of the plane of the sensor xy, thus allowing decoupling of the motion of detection of the sensing masses from the driving motion. The displacement of the sensing masses 16a, 16b out of the plane of the sensor xy causes a differential capacitive variation of the detection capacitors, the value of which is proportional to the angular velocity {right arrow over (Ω)}x, which can hence be determined in a per-se known manner via a purposely provided read circuit. In particular, since the reading scheme is differential, the presence of a pair of sensing masses enables automatic rejection of spurious linear accelerations along the orthogonal axis z. These accelerations, in fact, cause a variation in the same direction of the detection capacitors, which is cancelled by the differential reading (on the contrary, the same structure can be operated as an accelerometer detecting accelerations along the orthogonal axis z, by modifying the electrical connections between the sensing masses and electrodes). The presence of the central anchorage 7 also enables rejection of spurious linear accelerations along the axes x and y, given that the arrangement of elastic anchorage elements 8 is extremely rigid in these directions, and does not enable displacement of the sensing masses. Furthermore, the described structure is able to mechanically reject spurious angular acceleration about the orthogonal axis z, since the frequency response of the sensor can be modeled as a very selective filter.
In an altogether similar manner, the microelectromechanical sensor 1 is able to detect an angular velocity {right arrow over (Ω)}y about the second axis y. The rotary motion about the second axis y causes a Coriolis force, once again directed along the orthogonal axis z, which causes rotation of the sensing masses 16c, 16d about the axis of rotation parallel to the first axis x, and consequent opposite unbalancing of the corresponding detection capacitors.
The rotation about the first axis x is not sensed by the second pair of sensing masses 16c, 16d, in so far as the resultant Coriolis force {right arrow over (F)}c is zero (on account of the fact that the vector product between the angular velocity {right arrow over (Ω)}x and the corresponding driving velocity {right arrow over (v)}a is, to a first approximation, zero). Likewise, the rotation about the second axis y is not sensed for similar reasons by the first pair of sensing masses 16a, 16b, and consequently the two axes of detection are not affected and are substantially decoupled from one another.
Although advantageous compared to traditional gyroscope structures, the described microelectromechanical sensor is not optimized with respect to its sensitivity to external stresses, in particular due to the size of the sensing masses, which is limited by the overall dimension of the driving mass.
One embodiment of the present invention provides an integrated microelectromechanical structure that has an improved sensitivity to external stresses.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, an integrated microelectromechanical structure is consequently provided as defined in the present disclosure.
For a better understanding of the present invention, preferred embodiments thereof are now described purely by way of non-limiting examples and with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a microelectromechanical sensor is provided, wherein the geometrical shape of the sensing masses is such as to improve the overall sensitivity of the sensor.
As shown in
In detail, each of the through-openings 9a′-9d′ has in the plane of the sensor xy the shape of a radial annulus sector whose inner radius Ri can be as small as the inner radius of the driving mass 3 and outer radius Re can be as large as the outer radius of the same driving mass 3. This radial annulus sector has arc-shaped inner and outer sides, and radially extending lateral sides. In the exemplary embodiment shown in
Each of the sensing masses 16a′-16d′ has a shape corresponding to, and matching, that of the respective through-opening 9a′-9d′, thus having, in plan view, the overall shape of a radial annulus sector, and a radial geometry. In detail, each sensing mass 16a′-16d′ is divided by the corresponding elastic supporting elements 20 into a first portion 17′, a second portion 18′ and the connecting portion 19 (the latter interposed between, and connected to, the elastic supporting elements 20). The first portion 17′ is wider than the second portion 18′ along the first and second axis x, y, so that the centroid G′ of the sensing mass is located therein, and has an arc-shaped concave outer side and radially extending lateral sides; the second portion 18′ has an arc-shaped convex outer side and radially extending lateral sides, aligned along the lateral sides of the first portion 17′. The elastic supporting elements 20, extending at a distance from the centroid G′ of the respective sensing mass 16a′-16d′, form torsional springs that are rigid for the driving rotary motion of the driving mass 3, and also enable rotation of the sensing masses outside the plane of the sensor xy (as previously described).
The first and second detection electrodes 22′, 23′ are still arranged underneath the first and second portions 17′, 18′ of each one of the sensing masses 16a′-16d′; in the embodiment of
Operation of the microelectromechanical sensor 1′ does not differ from the one previously discussed with reference to the structure of
However, the Applicant has discovered that the previously described non-rectangular shape of the sensing masses 16a′-16d′ allows the microelectromechanical sensor 1′ to achieve an improved sensitivity to external stresses (in particular to the angular velocities {right arrow over (Ω)}x, {right arrow over (Ω)}y) without causing a variation of the structure resonance frequency. In particular, the solution herein described allows:
In detail, in
In order to prove the advantage in terms of sensitivity of the radial sensing mass, a comparison is made using a same area of the detection capacitors (detection electrodes 22′, 23′ are shown in dotted line in
where h1 is the height of the rectangular sensing mass.
The length L1 of the rectangular sensing mass may be also determined with geometrical considerations, by the expression:
Noting that the Coriolis force acting on each point of the sensing mass is distributed like the tangential driving velocity, i.e. proportionally to the distance from the center O, it is possible to show that the distance xf,1 between the center O and the centroid G of the rectangular sensing mass (i.e. the application point of the Coriolis force acting on the same rectangular sensing mass) is given by:
while the distance xf,2 between the center O and the centroid G′ of the radial sensing mass is given by:
It is thus possible to show that the centroid G of the rectangular sensing mass is always nearer to the elastic supporting elements 20 than the centroid G′ of the radial sensing mass (in other words, xf,1 is always smaller than xf,2). In particular,
Accordingly, the radial sensing mass experiences a torque that is greater than the one experienced by the rectangular sensing mass and thus undergoes a greater rotational movement outside of the pane of the sensor xy, allowing to achieve a higher sensitivity in the detection of the external stresses.
In greater detail, the torque Mt experienced by the sensing masses is given by the following general expression:
Mt=(xf−Ri−d)·Fc=(xf−Ri−d)·2·m·{right arrow over (Ω)}x{right arrow over (ν)}(xf)
wherein m is the mass of the sensing mass, {right arrow over (Ω)} is the angular velocity that is to be detected (the angular velocity {right arrow over (Ω)}x or {right arrow over (Ω)}y) and {right arrow over (v)} is the linear driving velocity at the application point of the Coriolis force Fc with respect to an inertial reference system fixed to the substrate 2 of the sensor.
It is clear from the above expression that a greater distance between the application point of the Coriolis force Fc and the axis of rotation (defined by the elastic supporting elements 20) contributes to the increase of the torque in two ways: first, it increases the lever arm of the Coriolis force Fc; and second, it increases the same Coriolis force Fc by increasing the driving velocity {right arrow over (v)}, which increases linearly with the distance from the center O.
The rotation θs of the sensing mass resulting from the application of the Coriolis force Fc is a function of the torque Mt and of the stiffness k of the elastic supporting elements 20, according to the following expression:
Considering the expressions of the Coriolis force Fc in both cases and considering the same design parameters (e.g. in terms of the natural frequency and mass density of the sensing mass) and the same driving velocity {right arrow over (v)}, the ratio between the rotation θs,1 of the rectangular sensing mass and the rotation θs,2 of the radial sensing mass can be expressed as:
A further embodiment of the present invention envisages the provision of further anchorages and elastic anchorage elements connected to the driving mass 3 in order to improve the stiffness of the same driving mass 3 outside the plane of the sensor xy.
As shown in
In detail, the first and second external anchorage arrangements 30, 31 are positioned externally of the driving mass 3, and are coupled to opposite sides of the same driving mass 3, with respect to the empty space 6 and center O; in the exemplary embodiment shown in
Each one of the first and second external anchorage arrangements 30, 31 includes a pair of external anchorages 32 (coupled to the substrate 2) and a pair of external elastic anchorage elements 33, coupling a respective external anchorage 32 to the driving mass 3. In the exemplary embodiment of
Each one of the external elastic anchorage elements 33 comprises a folded spring, generically extending along the first axis x and having the shape of a “S-shaped” folded beam. In greater detail, each folded spring includes: a first arm A, extending along the first axis x and connected to the respective outer side of the driving mass 3; a second arm B extending along the first axis x, parallel to the first arm A, and connected to a respective external anchorage 32; an intermediate arm C, also extending along the first axis x, and interposed between the first and second arms A, B in the second direction y; and a first and a second connecting portions D, E, extending along the second axis y and connecting (at a 90° angle) a respective end of the intermediate arm to the first arm A and to the second arm B, respectively.
Operation of the microelectromechanical sensor 1′ does not differ from the one previously discussed with reference to
However, the presence of the additional first and second external anchorage arrangements 30, 31 improves the overall stiffness of the driving mass 3 and allows to achieve an improved decoupling of the driving and sensing modes, particularly avoiding undesired movements of the driving mass 3 outside of the plane of the sensor xy. In other words, when the Coriolis force Fc acts on the structure, only the sensing masses 16a′-16d′ undergo a rotation outside the plane of the sensor xy, while the movement of the driving mass 3 remains substantially unaltered (and in the plane of the sensor xy), so that the sensitivity of the sensor is not affected. Also, it has been proven that undesired vibration modes of the structure are sufficiently removed that they do not interfere with the correct operation of the sensor.
The advantages of the microelectromechanical sensor are clear from the foregoing description.
Indeed, the proposed geometrical shape of the sensing masses allows to achieve a sensible increase in the sensitivity of the sensor, considering a same overall size of the sensor and a same natural frequency thereof, thanks to a more efficient use of the available detection area and a more efficient use of the Coriolis force Fc acting on the sensing masses. In particular, a suitable sizing of the radial sensing masses allows to fully exploit the available space (within the overall dimensions of the driving mass), thus achieving an even further increase of the sensitivity of the sensor.
Moreover, the use of additional external anchorage elements coupled to the driving mass allows to achieve an improved decoupling between the driving and sensing modes of operation.
The microelectromechanical sensor has compact dimensions, given the presence of a single driving mass that encloses in its overall dimensions the sensing masses. The rotary motion of the driving mass enables two components of driving velocity, orthogonal to one another in the plane of the sensor, to be automatically obtained, and hence effective implementation of a biaxial detection.
Finally, it is clear that modifications and variations can be made to what is described and illustrated herein, without thereby departing from the scope of the present invention.
In particular, a different geometry could be envisaged for the sensing masses, different from the radial one but still allowing an improved exploitation of the area available for detection (for example, a substantially trapezoidal geometry could be envisaged); in particular, any geometry can be envisaged having a centroid positioned at a distance farther away from the elastic supporting elements (and the corresponding rotation axis) than the centroid G of any rectangular mass inscribable within a same sector of the driving mass 3 and supported by respective elastic supporting elements extending along the same rotation axis. In analogous manner, also the detection electrodes may have a different shape, corresponding to that of the sensing mass; clearly, if a differential detection is to be implemented, the two detection electrodes should have a same shape.
In particular, it is clear that it is possible to switch the mode of operation of the microelectromechanical structure between a gyroscope mode and an accelerometer mode by simply modifying the connections between the electrodes of the detection capacitors (an operation that can be carried out by a purposely provided read circuit); also, a uniaxial sensor may be equally realized, by providing a single pair of radial sensing masses within the driving mass.
The driving mass can have a shape different from the circular one, for example any closed polygonal shape. Furthermore, even though this may not be advantageous, said shape may not have a perfect radial symmetry (or in general any other type of symmetry).
In a per-se known manner, the displacement of the sensing masses can be detected with a different technique other than the capacitive one, for example, by detecting a magnetic force.
Furthermore, the torsional moment for causing the driving mass to oscillate with rotary motion can be generated in a different manner, for example by means of parallel-plate electrodes, or else magnetic actuation.
The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. All of the above U.S. patents, U.S. patent application publications, U.S. patent applications, foreign patents, foreign patent applications and non-patent publications referred to in this specification and/or listed in the Application Data Sheet, are incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety. Aspects of the embodiments can be modified, if necessary to employ concepts of the various patents, applications and publications to provide yet further embodiments.
These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.
Zerbini, Sarah, Coronato, Luca, Ludovico, Alessandro Balzelli
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10132877, | Apr 29 2014 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Micro-electromechanical apparatus with pivot element |
10551193, | Sep 11 2009 | Invensense, Inc. | MEMS device with improved spring system |
9464896, | Jun 22 2012 | National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology | Device for measuring rotation angle acceleration |
9476897, | May 29 2012 | Denso Corporation | Physical quantity sensor |
9891053, | Sep 11 2009 | Invensense, Inc. | MEMS device with improved spring system |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4159125, | Nov 04 1977 | General Motors Corporation | Uncoupled strut suspension system |
5447068, | Mar 31 1994 | University of Michigan | Digital capacitive accelerometer |
5728936, | Aug 16 1995 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Rotary speed sensor |
5889207, | May 03 1996 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Micromechanical rate of rotation sensor having ring with drive element and detection element |
5895850, | Apr 23 1994 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Micromechanical resonator of a vibration gyrometer |
6062082, | Jun 30 1995 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Micromechanical acceleration or coriolis rotation-rate sensor |
6189381, | Apr 26 1999 | EMCOR CORPORATION; Emcore Corporation | Angular rate sensor made from a structural wafer of single crystal silicon |
6230563, | Jun 09 1998 | ANALOG DEVICES IMI, INC | Dual-mass vibratory rate gyroscope with suppressed translational acceleration response and quadrature-error correction capability |
6244111, | Oct 30 1998 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Micromechanical gradient sensor |
6250156, | May 19 1996 | Regents of the University of California, The | Dual-mass micromachined vibratory rate gyroscope |
6250157, | Jun 22 1998 | Aisin Seiki Kabushiki Kaisha | Angular rate sensor |
6308567, | Dec 10 1998 | Denso Corporation | Angular velocity sensor |
6349597, | Oct 07 1996 | Hahn-Schickard-Gesellschaft fur angewandte Forschung e.V. | Rotation rate sensor with uncoupled mutually perpendicular primary and secondary oscillations |
6374672, | Jul 28 2000 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Silicon gyro with integrated driving and sensing structures |
6508124, | Sep 10 1999 | STMICROELECTRONICS S R L | Microelectromechanical structure insensitive to mechanical stresses |
6513380, | Jun 19 2001 | PINEAPPLE34, LLC | MEMS sensor with single central anchor and motion-limiting connection geometry |
6520017, | Aug 12 1999 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Micromechanical spin angular acceleration sensor |
6535800, | May 29 2001 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Vehicle rollover sensing using angular rate sensors |
6626039, | Sep 17 1999 | GEFUS SBIC II, L P | Electrically decoupled silicon gyroscope |
6715352, | Jun 26 2001 | NYTELL SOFTWARE LLC | Method of designing a flexure system for tuning the modal response of a decoupled micromachined gyroscope and a gyroscoped designed according to the method |
6722197, | Jun 19 2001 | Honeywell International Inc. | Coupled micromachined structure |
6752017, | Feb 21 2001 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Rotation speed sensor |
6766689, | Apr 27 2001 | STMICROELECTRONICS S R L | Integrated gyroscope of semiconductor material |
6837107, | Apr 28 2003 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Micro-machined multi-sensor providing 1-axis of acceleration sensing and 2-axes of angular rate sensing |
6848304, | Apr 28 2003 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Six degree-of-freedom micro-machined multi-sensor |
6894576, | Nov 02 1999 | ETA SA Fabriques d'Ebauches | Temperature compensation mechanism for a micromechanical ring resonator |
6918298, | Dec 24 2002 | Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. | Horizontal and tuning fork vibratory microgyroscope |
6928872, | Apr 27 2001 | STMicroelectronics, Inc | Integrated gyroscope of semiconductor material with at least one sensitive axis in the sensor plane |
6952965, | Dec 24 2002 | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO , LTD | Vertical MEMS gyroscope by horizontal driving |
7100446, | Jul 20 2004 | The Regents of the University of California | Distributed-mass micromachined gyroscopes operated with drive-mode bandwidth enhancement |
7155976, | Jan 05 2005 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Rotation sensing apparatus and method for manufacturing the same |
7240552, | Jun 06 2005 | EMCOR CORPORATION; Emcore Corporation | Torsional rate sensor with momentum balance and mode decoupling |
7258012, | Feb 24 2003 | UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC | Integrated monolithic tri-axial micromachined accelerometer |
7284429, | Sep 09 2003 | Thales | Micromachined double tuning-fork gyrometer with detection in the plane of the machined wafer |
7322242, | Aug 13 2004 | STMICROELECTRONICS S R L | Micro-electromechanical structure with improved insensitivity to thermomechanical stresses induced by the package |
7347094, | Apr 14 2004 | Analog Devices, Inc | Coupling apparatus for inertial sensors |
7398683, | Feb 11 2003 | MURATA MANUFACTURING CO , LTD | Capacitive acceleration sensor |
7437933, | Jul 12 2004 | STMICROELECTRONICS S R L | Micro-electro-mechanical structure having electrically insulated regions and manufacturing process thereof |
7454246, | Sep 08 2005 | Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary | Sensor signal alignment |
7461552, | Oct 23 2006 | EMCOR CORPORATION; Emcore Corporation | Dual axis rate sensor |
7481111, | Aug 03 2004 | STMicroelectronics S.r.l. | Micro-electro-mechanical sensor with force feedback loop |
7513155, | Dec 05 2005 | Hitachi, LTD | Inertial sensor |
7520169, | Apr 08 2004 | LEONHARD OLGEMOELLER FRICKE; Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Foerderung der Angewandten Forschung E V | Angular rate sensor featuring mechanically decoupled oscillation modes |
7677099, | Nov 05 2007 | Invensense Inc. | Integrated microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) vibrating mass Z-axis rate sensor |
7694563, | Mar 10 2006 | STMICROELECTRONICS S R L | Microelectromechanical integrated sensor structure with rotary driving motion |
7797998, | Aug 13 2003 | Sercel | Accelerometer with reduced extraneous vibrations owing to improved electrode shape |
7907177, | Nov 16 2006 | Intellectual Ventures Fund 83 LLC | Method for eliminating error in camera having angular velocity detection system |
8037756, | Feb 13 2007 | STMicroelectronics S.r.l. | Microelectromechanical gyroscope with open loop reading device and control method |
8042396, | Sep 11 2007 | STMICROELECTRONICS S R L | Microelectromechanical sensor with improved mechanical decoupling of sensing and driving modes |
8096181, | Jun 16 2006 | Sony Corporation | Inertial sensor |
8261614, | Mar 10 2006 | CONTINENTAL TEVES AG & CO OHG | Rotational speed sensor having a coupling bar |
8272267, | Jan 07 2008 | Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Angular velocity sensor |
8342023, | Jun 29 2007 | Northrop Grumman LITEF GmbH | Coriolis gyro |
8353212, | Jul 31 2007 | HANKING ELECTRONICS, LTD | Micromechanical rate-of-rotation sensor |
8549919, | Sep 10 2007 | CONTINENTAL TEVES AG & CO OHG | Micromechanical rotation rate sensor with a coupling bar and suspension spring elements for quadrature suppression |
20020189351, | |||
20020189354, | |||
20040035204, | |||
20060112764, | |||
20070062282, | |||
20070214883, | |||
20080276706, | |||
20090064780, | |||
20090100930, | |||
20100126269, | |||
20100126272, | |||
20100154541, | |||
20100199764, | |||
20100281977, | |||
20120060604, | |||
CN1813194, | |||
DE102004017480, | |||
DE102006046772, | |||
DE102007012163, | |||
DE19641284, | |||
EP971208, | |||
EP1253399, | |||
EP1365211, | |||
EP1617178, | |||
EP1619471, | |||
EP1624286, | |||
EP1832841, | |||
EP1962054, | |||
JP2005241500, | |||
WO29855, | |||
WO2103364, | |||
WO2006043890, | |||
WO2007086849, | |||
WO2007145113, | |||
WO2009033915, | |||
WO2009087858, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 24 2013 | STMicroelectronics S.r.l. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 25 2019 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 22 2023 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Nov 03 2018 | 4 years fee payment window open |
May 03 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 03 2019 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Nov 03 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Nov 03 2022 | 8 years fee payment window open |
May 03 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 03 2023 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Nov 03 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Nov 03 2026 | 12 years fee payment window open |
May 03 2027 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 03 2027 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Nov 03 2029 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |