Ergonomic man-machine interface incorporating adaptive pattern recognition based control system

Abstract

An adaptive interface for a programmable system, for predicting a desired user function, based on user history, as well as machine internal status and context. The apparatus receives an input from the user and other data. A predicted input is presented for confirmation by the user, and the predictive mechanism is updated based on this feedback. Also provided is a pattern recognition system for a multimedia device, wherein a user input is matched to a video stream on a conceptual basis, allowing inexact programming of a multimedia device. The system analyzes a data stream for correspondence with a data pattern for processing and storage. The data stream is subjected to adaptive pattern recognition to extract features of interest to provide a highly compressed representation which may be efficiently processed to determine correspondence. Applications of the interface and system include a VCR, medical device, vehicle control system, audio device, environmental control system, securities trading terminal, and smart house. The system optionally includes an actuator for effecting the environment of operation, allowing closed-loop feedback operation and automated learning.

Description

The present application is a FIG. 31 is a block diagram of a vehicle communicating with services according to some embodiments.FIG. 31 is a block diagram of a vehicle communicating with services according to some embodiments. According to another aspect of the present invention, an automobile positioning system is provided, which may be extraterrestrial, e.g., geographic positioning system (GPS), or terrestrial, e.g., cellular base station, LORAN, etc. Such a system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,390,125, incorporated herein by reference; see references cited therein. A controller in the automobile 3104 is provided with an itinerary for the vehicle travel. Based on position and itinerary, the vehicle 3104 may communicate with various services 3102, such as food, fuel and lodging providers, to “negotiate” for business. The driver may be provided with customized “billboards”, directed to his demographics. Reservations and discounts may all be arranged while en-route. Communication between the automobile 3104 and the services 3102 is preferably provided by cellular data packet device (CDPD) services 3106, which is a cellular based 832 MHz band digital data transmission system. Therefore, an existing cell phone system or CDPD modem system 3106 may be employed for telecommunication. Preferably, a simple display is provided for presentation of commercial messages to the driver or passenger and for interacting with the service 3102.

As a matter of practice, the service may be subsidized by the service providers, thus reducing the cost to the consumer. The extent of the subsidy may be determined by the amount of data transmitted or by the eventual consummation of the transaction negotiated.

Because of the positioning system, any variance from the itinerary may be transmitted to the service providers, so that reservations may be cancelled, or substitute services provided in a different location or at a different time.

The telecommunication system may also be used as an emergency system, to contact emergency services and/or police in the event of accident or distress. The transponder system may also be part of an antitheft system. The transponder may also be part of a vehicular maintenance and diagnostic system to ensure proper servicing and to help determine the nature of problems. Raw or processed data may be transmitted to a centralized station for full analysis and diagnosis. Because the vehicle need not be at the repair shop for diagnosis, problems may be analyzed earlier and based on extensive, objective sensor data.

It should be understood that the preferred embodiments and examples described herein are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention, which is properly delineated only in the appended claims.

REFERENCES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

“32-bit Floating-Point DSP Processors”, EDN, Nov. 7, 1991, pp. 127-146.

“A New Class of Markov Processes for Image Encoding”, School of Mathematics, Georgia Inst. of Technology (1988), pp. 14-32.

“Bar Code Programs VCR”, Design News, Feb. 1, 1988, 26.

“C-Cube CL550 JPEG Image Compression Processor”, Preliminary Data Book, August 1991, and addendum dated Nov. 20, 1991.

“Construction of Fractal Objects with Iterated Function Systems”, Siggraph '85 Proceedings, 19(3):271-278 (1985).

“Data Compression: Pntng by Numbrs”, The Economist, May 21, 1988.

“EMC² Pushes Video Rental By Satellite”, Electronic Engineering Times, Dec. 2, 1991, p.1, p. 98.

“Finger Painting”, Information Display 12, p. 18, 1981.

“Fractal Modelling of Real World Images, Lecture Notes for Fractals: Introduction, Basics and Perspectives”, Siggraph (1987).

“Fractal Geometry-Understanding Chaos”; Georgia Tech Alumni Magazine; p. 16 (Spring 1986).

“Fractal Modelling of Biological Structures”, Perspectives in Biological Dynamics and Theoretical Medicine, Koslow, Mandell, Shlesinger, eds., Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 504, 179-194 (date unknown).

“Fractals Yield High Compression”; Electronic Engineering Times; Sep. 30, 1991; p. 39.

“Fractals-A Geometry of Nature”, Georgia Institute of Technology Research Horizons; p. 9 (Spring 1986).

“How to find the best value in VCRs”, Consumer Reports, March 1988, 135-141.

“Low-Cost VCRs: More For Less”, Consumer Reports, March 1990, 168-172.

“Machine Now Reads, enters Information 25 Times Faster Than Human Keyboard Operators”, Information Display 9, p. 18 (1981).

“New Beetle Cursor Director Escapes All Surface Constraints”, Information Display 10, p. 12, 1984.

“Nielsen Views VCRs”, Television Digest, Jun. 23, 1988, 15.

“Scanner Converts Materials to Electronic Files for PCs”, IEEE CG&A, December 1984, p. 76.

“The Highs and Lows of Nielsen Homevideo Index”, Marketing & Media Decisions, November 1985, 84-86+.

“The Smart House: Human Factors in Home Automation”, Human Factors in Practice, December 1990, 1-36.

“The Quest for ‘User Friendly’”, U.S. News & World Report, Jun. 13, 1988. 54-56.

“VCR, Camcorder Trends”, Television Digest, Vol.. 29, Mar. 20, 1989, 16.

“VCR's: A Look At The Top Of The Line”, Consumer Reports, March 1989, 167-170.

“VHS Videocassette Recorders”, Consumer Guide, 1990, 17-20.

“Voice Recognition and Speech Processing”, Elektor Electronics, September 1985, pp. 56-57.

Abedini, Kamran, and Hadad, George, “Guidelines For Designing Better VCRs”, Report No. IME 462, Feb. 4, 1987.

Abedini, Kamran, “An Ergonomically-improved Remote Control Unit Design”, Interface '87 Proceedings, 375-380.

Aleksander, I.; “Guide to Pattern Recognition Using Random-Access Memories”; Computers and Digital Techniques; 2(1):2940 (February 1979).

Anderson, F., W. Christiansen, B. Kortegaard; “Real Time, Video Image Centroid Tracker”; Apr. 16-20, 1990.

Anson, L., M. Barnsley; “Graphics Compression Technology”; SunWorld; pp. 43-52 (October 1991).

Appriou, A., “Interet des theories de l'incertain en fusion de donnees”, Colloque International sur le Radar Paris, 24-28 avril 1989.

Appriou, A., “Procedure d'aide a la decision multi-informateurs. Applications a la classification multi-capteurs de cibles”, Symposium de l'Avionics Panel (AGARD) Turquie, 25-29 avril 1988.

Arrow, K. J., “Social choice and individual valves”, John Wiley and Sons Inc. (1963).

Atkinson, Terry, “VCR Programming: Making Life Easier Using Bar Codes”.

Baldwin, William, “Just the Bare Facts, Please”, Forbes Magazine, Dec. 12, 1988.

Ballard, D. H., and Brown, C. M., Computer Vision, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1982).

Barnsley et al., “Harnessing Chaos For Images Systhesis”, Computer Graphics, 22(4):131-140 (August, 1988).

Barnsley, M. F., Ervin, V., Hardin, D., Lancaster, J., “Solution of an Inverse Problem for Fractals and Other Sets”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 83:1975-1977 (April 1986).

Barnsley, M. F., “Fractals Everywhere”, Academic Press, Boston, Mass., 1988,

Barnsley, M. F., and Demko, S., “Iterated Function Systems and The Global Construction of Fractals”, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., A399:243-275 (1985).

Barnsley et al., “Hidden Variable Fractal Interpolation Functions”, School of Mathematics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga. 30332, July, 1986.

Barnsley et al., “A Better Way to Compress Images”, Byte Magazine, January 1988, pp. 213-225.

Barnsley et al., “Chaotic Compression”, Computer Graphics World, November 1987.

Batchelor, B. G.; “Practical Approach to Pattern Classification”; Plenum Press, London and New York; (1974).

Batchelor, B. G.; “Pattern Recognition, Ideas in Practice”; Plenum Press, London and New York; (1978).

Baxes, Gregory A., “Digital Signal Processing, A Practical Primer”, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1984).

Bellman, R. E., L. A. Zadeh, “Decision making in a fuzzy environment”, Management Science, 17(4) (December 1970).

Bensch, U., “VPV—VIDEOTEXT PROGRAMS VIDEORECORDER”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 34(3):788-792 (1988).

Berger, Ivan, “Secrets of the Universals”, Video, February 1989, 45-47+.

Beringer, D. B., “A Comparative Evaluation of Calculator Watch Data Entry Technologies: Keyboards to Chalkboards”, Applied Ergonomics, December 1985, 275-278.

Bhatnagar, R. K., L. N. Kamal, “Handling uncertain information: a review of numeric and non-numeric methods”, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, L. N. Kamal and J. F. Lemmer, Eds. (1986).

Bishop, Edward W., and Guinness, G. Victor Jr., “Human Factors Interaction with Industrial Design”, Human Factors, 8(4):279-289 (August 1966).

Blair, D., R. Pollack, “La logique du choix collectif” Pour la Science (1983).

Brown, Edward, “Human Factors Concepts For Management”, Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 1973, 372-375.

Bulkeley, Debra, “The Smartest House in America”, Design News, Oct. 19, 1987, 56-61.

Burr, D. J.; “A Neural Network Digit Recognizer”; Proceedings of the 1986 IEEE International Conference of Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Atlanta, Ga.; pp. 1621-1625.

Bursky, D., “Improved DSP ICs Eye New Horizons”, Electronic Design, Nov. 11, 1993, pp. 69-82.

Caffery, B.; Fractal Compression Breakthrough for Multimedia Applications”; Inside; Oct. 9, 1991.

Card, Stuart K., “A Method for Calculating Performance times for Users of Interactive Computing Systems”, IEEE, 1979, 653-658.

Carlson, Mark A., “Design Goals for an Effective User Interface”, Human Interfacing with Instruments, Electro/82 Proceedings, 3/1/1-3/1/4.

Carpenter, G. A., S. Grossberg, “The Art of Adaptive Pattern Recognition by a Self-Organizing Neural Network,” IEEE Computer, March 1988, pp. 77-88.

Carroll, Paul B., “High Tech Gear Draws Cries of “Uncle”, Wall Street Journal, Apr. 27, 1988, 29.

Casasent, D., et al.;, “General I and Q Data Processing on a Multichannel AO System”; Applied Optics; 25(18):3217-24 (Sep. 15, 1986).

Casasent, D., Photonics Spectra, November 1991, pp. 134-140.

Casasent, D., and Tescher, A., Eds., “Hybrid Image and Signal Processing II”, Proc. SPIE Technical Symposium, April 1990, Orlando Fla. 1297 (1990).

Caudill, M.; “Neural Networks Primer-Part III”; AI Expert; June 1988; pp. 53-59.

Chao, J. J., E. Drakopoulos, C. C. Lee, “An evidential reasoning approach to distributed multiple hypothesis detection”, Proceedings of the 20th Conference on decision and control, Los Angeles, Calif., December 1987.

Chao, T.-H.; Hegblom, E.; Lau, B.; Stoner, W. W.; Miceli, W. J., “Optoelectronically implemented neural network with a wavelet preprocessor”, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2026:472-82 (1993).

Chen et al.; “Adaptive Coding of Monochrome and Color Images”; November 1977; pp. 1285-1292.

Cheong, C. K.; Aizawa, K.; Saito, T.; Hatori, M., “Adaptive edge detection with fractal dimension”, Transactions of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers D-II, J76D-II(11):2459-63 (1993)

Cobb, Nathan, “I don't get it”, Boston Sunday Globe Magazine, Mar. 25, 1990, 23-29.

Computer Visions, Graphics, and Image Processing 1987, 37:54-115.

Computers and Biomedical Research 5, 388-410 (1972).

Cooper, L. N.; “A Possible Organization of Animal Memory and Learning”; Nobel 24; (1973); Collective Properties of Physical Systems; pp. 252-264

Crawford et al.; “Adaptive Pattern Recognition Applied To An Expert System For Fault Diagnosis In Telecommunications Equipment”; pp. 10/1-8 (Inspec. Abstract No. 86CO10699, Insepc IEE (London) & IEE Coll. on “Adaptive Filters”, Digest No. 76, Oct. 10, 1985)

Danielsson, Erik, et al.; “Computer Architectures for Pictorial Inf. Systems”; IEEE Computer, Noveber., 1981; pp. 53-67.

Davis, Fred, “The Great Look-and-Feel Debate”, A+, 5:9-11 (July 1987).

Dehning, Waltraud, Essig Heidrun, and Maass, Susanne, The Adaptation of Virtual Man-Computer Interfaces to User Requirements in Dialogs, Germany, Springer-Verlag, 1981.

Dempster, A. P., “A generalization of Bayesian inference”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 30, Series B (1968).

Dempster, A. P., “Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping”, Annals of mathematical Statistics, no. 38 (1967).

Denker; 1984 International Test Conf., October 1984, Philadelphia, Pa.; pp. 558-563.

Derra, Skip, “Researchers Use Fractal Geometry . . . ”, Research and Development Magazine, March 1988.

Donovan, J., “Intel/IBM's Audio-Video Kernel”, Byte, December, 1991, pp. 177-202.

Dubois, D., N. Prade, “Fuzzy sets and systems-Theory and applications”, Academic Press, New York (1980).

Dubois, D.; “Modeles mathernatiques de l'imprecis et de l'incertain en vue d'applications aux techniques d'aide a la decision”; Doctoral Thesis, University of Grenoble (1983).

Dubois, D., N. Prade, “Combination of uncertainty with belief functions: a reexamination”, Proceedings 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Los Angeles (1985):

Dubois, D., N. Prade, “Theorie des possibilites: application a la representation des connaissances en informatique”, Masson, Paris (1985).

Duda, R. O., P. E. Hart, M. J. Nilsson, “Subjective Bayesian methods for rule-based inference systems”, Technical Note 124-Artificial Intelligence Center-SRI International.

Dunning, B. B.; “Self-Learning Data-Base For Automated Fault Localization”; IEEE; 1979; pp. 155-157.

Ehrenreich, S. L., “Computer Abbreviations—Evidence and Synthesis”, Human Factors, 27(2):143-155 (April 1985).

Electronic Engineering Times (EET), Oct. 28, 1991, p. 62.

Elton, J., “An Ergodic Theorem for Iterated Maps”, Journal of Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 7 (1987).

Farrelle, Paul M. and Jain, Anil K.; “Recursive Block Coding-A New Approach to Transform Coding”; IEEE Transactions on Communications, Corn. 34(2) (February 1986).

Fitzpatrick, J. M., J. J. Grefenstette, D. Van Gucht; “Image Registration by Genetic Search”; Conf. Proc., IEEE Southeastcon 1984; pp. 460-464.

Foley, J. D., Wallace, V. L., Chan, P., “The Human Factor of Computer Graphics Interaction Techniques”, IEEE CG&A, November 1984, pp. 1348.

Friedman, M. B., “An Eye Gaze Controlled Keyboard”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering, 1984, 446-447.

Fua, P. V., “Using probability density functions in the framework of evidential reasoning Uncertainty in knowledge based systems”, B. Bouchon, R. R. Yager, Eds. Springer Verlag (1987).

Gilfoil, D., and Mauro, C. L., “Integrating Human Factors and Design: Matching Human Factors Methods up to Product Development”, C. L. Mauro Assoc., Inc., 1-7.

Gleick, James, “Making a New Science”, pp. 215, 239, date unknown.

Gogoussis et al.; Proc. SPIE Intl. Soc. Opt. Eng., November 1984, Cambridge, Mass.; pp. 121-127.

Gonzalez, Rafael C., “Digital Image Processing”, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. (1987).

Gould, John D., Boies, Stephen J., Meluson, Antonia, Rasammy, Marwan, and Vosburgh, Ann Marie, “Entry and Selection Methods For Specifying Dates”. Human Factors, 32(2):199-214 (April 1989).

Green, Lee, “Thermo Tech: Here's a common sense guide to the new thinking thermostats”, Popular Mechanics, October 1985, 155-159.

Grossberg, S., G. Carpenter, “A Massively Parallel Architecture for a Self-Organizing Neural Pattern Recognition Machine,” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing (1987, 37, 54-115), pp. 252-315.

Grudin, Jonathan, “The Case Against User Interface Consistency”, MCC Technical Report Number ACA-HI-002-89, January 1989.

Gullichsen, E., E. Chang, “Pattern Classification by Neural Network: An Experiment System for Icon Recognition,” ICNN Proceeding on Neural Networks, March 1987, pp. IV-725-32.

Haruki, K. et al.; “Pattern Recognition of Handwritten Phonetic Japanese Alphabet Characters”; International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Washington, D.C.; January 1990; pp. II515 to II518.

Harvey, Michael G., and Rothe, James T., “VideoCassette Recorders: Their Impact on Viewers and Advertisers”, Journal of Advertising, 25:19-29 (December/January 1985).

Hawkins, William J., “Super Remotes”, Popular Science, February 1989, 76-77.

Hayashi, Y., et al.; “Alphanumeric Character Recognition Using a Connectionist Model with the Pocket Algorithm”; Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Washington, D.C. Jun. 18-22; 1989; vol. 2, pp. 606-613.

Hayes, H. I.; Solka, J. L.; Priebe, C. E.; “Parallel computation of fractal dimension”, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 1962:219-30 (1993).

Henke, Lucy L., and Donohue, Thomas R., “Functional Displacement of Traditional TV Viewing by VCR Owners”, Journal of Advertising Research, 29:18-24 (April-May 1989).

Hinton et al.; “Boltzmann Machines: Constraint Satisfaction Networks that Learn”; Tech. Report CMU-CS-85-119; Carnegie-Mellon Univ; 5/84.

Hirzinger, G., Landzettel, K., “Sensory Feedback Structures for Robots with Supervised Learning”, IEEE Conf. on Robotics and Automation, St. Louis, March 1985.

Hoare, F.; de Jager, G., “Neural networks for extracting features of objects in images as a pre-processing stage to pattern classification”, Proceedings of the 1992 South African Symposium on Communications and Signal Processing. COMSIG '92 (Cat. No.92TH0482-0). Inggs, M. (Ed.), p. 239-42 (1992).

Hoban, Phoebe, “Stacking the Decks”, New York, Feb. 16, 1987, 20:14.

Hoffberg, Linda I., “AN IMPROVED HUMAN FACTORED INTERFACE FOR PROGRAMMABLE DEVICES: A CASE STUDY OF THE VCR”, Master's Thesis, Tufts University (Master of Sciences in Engineering Design, November).

Hoffberg, Linda I., “Designing User Interface Guidelines For Time-Shift Programming of a Video Cassette Recorder (VCR)”, Proc. of the Human Factors Soc. 35th Ann. Mtg. pp. 501-504 (1991).

Hoffberg, Linda I., “Designing a Programmable Interface for a Video Cassette Recorder (VCR) to Meet a User's Needs”, Interface 91 pp. 346-351 (1991).

Hopfield et al; “Computing with Neural Circuits: A Model”; Science; vol. 233:625-633 (8 August 1986).

Hopfield; “Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons”; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 81:3088-3092 (May 1984).

Hopfield; “Neural Networks and Physical Systems with Emergent Collective Computational Abilities”; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 79:2554-2558 (April 1982).

Horgan, H., “Medical Electronics”, IEEE Spectrum, January 1984, pp. 90-93.

Howard, Bill, “Point and Shoot Devices”, PC Magazine, 6:95-97, August 1987.

Hurtgen, B.; Buttgen, P., “Fractal approach to low rate video coding”, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2094(pt. 1):120-31(1993).

Information Processing 71; North-Holland Publishing Company (1972) pp. 1530-1533.

Ishizuka, M., “Inference methods based on extended Dempster and Shafer's theory for problems with uncertainty/fuzziness”, New Generation Computing, 1:159-168 (1983), Ohmsha, Ltd., and Springer Verlag.

Jackel, L. D., H. P. Graf, J. S. Denker, D. Henderson and I. Guyon, “An Application of Neural Net Chips: Handwritten Digit Recognition,” ICNN Proceeding, 1988, pp. II-107-15.

Jane Pauley Special, NBC TV News Transcript, Jul. 17, 1990, 10:00 PM.

Jean, J. S. N., et al.; “Input Representation and Output Voting Considerations for Handwritten Numeral Recognition with Backpropagation”; International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Washington, D.C., January 1990; pp. I-408 to I-411.

Jeffrey, R. J., “The logic of decision”, The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London (1983)(2nd Ed.).

Kaufmann, A., “Introduction a la theorie des sousensembles flous”, Vol. 1, 2 et 3-Masson-Paris (1975).

Keeney, R. L., B. Raiffa, “Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs”, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1976).

Kellman, P., “Time Integrating Optical Signal Processing”, Ph. D. Dissertation, Stanford University, 1979, pp. 51-55.

Kim, D. H.; Caulfield, H. J.; Jannson, T.; Kostrzewski, A.; Savant, G, “Optical fractal image processor for noise-embedded targets detection”, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Vol: 2026 p. 1449 (1993) (SPIE Conf: Photonics for Processors, Neural Networks, and Memories 12-15 July 1993, San Diego, Calif., USA).

Kim, Y., “Chips Deliver Multimedia”, Byte, December 1991, pp. 163-173.

Knowlton, K., “Virtual Pushbuttons as a Means of Person-Machine Interaction”, Proc of Conf. Computer Graphics, Pattern Recognition and Data Structure, Beverly Hills, Calif., May 1975, pp. 350-352.

Koch, H., “Ergonomische Betrachtung von Schreibtastaturen”, Humane Production, 1, pp. 12-15 (1985).

Kohonen; “Self-Organization & Memory”, Second Ed., 1988; Springer-Verlag; pp. 199-209.

Kolson, Ann, “Computer wimps drown in a raging sea of technology”, The Hartford Courant, May 24, 1989, B1.

Kortegaard, B. L.; “PAC-MAN, a Precision Alignment Control System for Multiple Laser Beams Self-Adaptive Through the Use of Noise”; Los Alamos National Laboratory; date unknown.

Kortegaard, B. L.; “Superfine Laser Position Control Using Statistically Enhanced Resolution in Real Time”; Los Alamos National Laboratory; SPIE-Los Angeles Technical Symposium; Jan. 23-25, 1985.

Kraiss, K. F., “Alternative Input Devices For Human Computer Interaction”, Forschunginstitut Für Anthropotecahnik, Werthhoven, F.R. Germany.

Kraiss, K. F., “Neuere Methoden der Interaktion an der Schnittstelle Mensch-Maschine”, Z. F. Arbeitswissenschaft, 2, pp. 65-70, 1978.

Kreifeldt, John, “Human Factors Approach to Medical Instrument Design”,. Electro/82 Proceedings, 3/3/1-3/3/6.

Kreifeldt, J. G., “A Methodology For Consumer Product Safety Analysis”, The 3rd National Symposium on Human Factors in Industrial Design in Consumer Products, August 1982, 175-184.

Ksienski et al., “Low Frequency Approach to Target Identification”, Proc. of the IEEE, 63(12):1651-1660 (December 1975).

Kuocheng, Andy Poing, and Ellingstad, Vernon S., “Touch Tablet and Touch Input”, Interface '87, 327.

Kyburg, H. E., “Bayesian and non Bayesian evidential updating”, Artificial Intelligence 31:271-293 (1987).

LeCun, Y., et al., “Handwritten Digit Recognition: Applications of Neural...”, IEEE Comm. Magazine, pp. 41-46 (November 1989).

LeCun, Y., “Connectionism in Perspective”, in R. Pfeifer, Z. Schreter, F. Fogelman, L. Steels, (Eds.), 1989, “Generalization and Network Design Strategies”, pp. 143-55.

Ledgard, Henry, Singer, Andrew, and Whiteside, John, Directions in Human Factors for Interactive Systems, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1981.

Lee, Eric, and MacGregor, James, “Minimizing User Search Time Menu Retrieval Systems”, Human Factors, 27(2):157-162 (April 1986).

Lendaris, G. G., and Stanely, G. L., “Diffraction Pattern Sampling for Automatic Target Recognition”, Proc. IEEE 58:198-205 (1979).

Leon, Carol Boyd, “Selling Through the VCR”, American Demographics, December 1987, 40-43.

Liepins, G. E., M. R. Hilliard; “Genetic Algorithms: Foundations & Applications”; Annals of Operations Research, 21:31-58 (1989).

Li, H. Y. et al, Applied Optics (April, 1993).

Lin, H. K., et al.; “Real-Time Screen-Aided Multiple-Image Optical Holographic Matched-Filter Correlator”; Applied Optics; 21(18):3278-3286 (Sep. 15, 1982)

Lippmann, R. P., “An Introduction to Computing with Neural Nets”, IEEE ASSP Magazine, 4(2):4-22 (April 1987).

Liu, Y., “Pattern recognition using Hilbert space”, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 1825:63-77 (1992).

Liu, Y., “Extensions of fractal theory”, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 1966:255-68(1993).

Long, John, “The Effect of Display Format on the Direct Entry of Numerical Information by Pointing”, Human Factors, 26(1):3-17 (February 1984).

Lu, C., “Computer Pointing Devices: Living With Mice”, High Technology, January 1984, pp. 61-65.

Mahalanobis, A., et al.; “Minimum Average Correlation Energy Filters”; Applied Optics; 26(17):3633-40 (Sep. 1, 1987).

Mandelbrot, B., “The Fractal Geometry of Nature”, W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, Calif., 1982, 1977; and

Mantei, Marilyn M., and Teorey, Toby J., “Cost/Benefit Analysis for Incorporating Human Factors in the Software Lifecycle”, Association for Computing Machinery, 1988.

Maragos, P., “Tutorial Advances in Morphological Image Processing” Optical Engineering 26:7:623-632 (1987).

Martin, G. L. et al.; “Recognizing Hand-Printed Letters and Digits Using Backpropagation Learning”; Technical Report of the MCC, Human Interface Laboratory, Austin, Tex.; January 1990; pp. 1-9.

McAulay, A. D., J. C. Oh; “Image Learning Classifier System Using Genetic Algorithms”; IEEE Proc. of the National Aerospace & Electronics Conference; 2:705-710 (1989).

Meads, Jon A., “Friendly or Frivolous”, Datamation, Apr. 1, 1988, 98-100.

Miller, R. K.; Neural Networks ((c) 1989: Fairmont Press; Lilburn, Ga.); pp. 2-12 and Chapter 4, “Implementation of Neural Networks”; pp. 4-1 to 4-26.

Molley, P., “Implementing the Difference-Squared Error Algorithm Using An Acousto-Optic Processor”, SPIE, 1098:232-239,(1989).

Molley, P., et al., “A High Dynamic Range Acousto-Optic Image Correlator for Real-Time Pattern Recognition”, SPIE, 938:55-65 (1988).

Moore, T. G. and Dartnall, “Human Factors of a Microelectronic Product: The Central Heating Timer/Programmer”, Applied Ergonomics, 13(1): 15-23 (1983).

Mori; “Towards the construction of a large-scale neural network”; Electronics Information Communications Association Bulletin PRU 88-59; pp. 87-94.

Naik et al., “High Performance Speaker Verification . . . ”, ICASSP 86, Tokyo, CH22434/86/0000-0881, IEEE 1986, pp. 881-884.

Netravali, Arun N., and Haskell, Barry G., “Digital Pictures Representation and Compression”, Plenum Press, New York (1988).

Ney, H., et al.; “A Data Driven Organization of the Dynamic Programming Beam Search for Continuous Speech Recognition”; Proc. ICASSP 87; pp. 833-836; 1987.

Nilsson, N. J.; The Mathematical Foundations of Learning Machines ((c) 1990: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, Calif.) and particularly section 2.6 “The Threshold Logic Unit (TLU)”, pp. 21-23 and Chapter 6, “Layered Machines” pp. 95-114.

Norman, Donald A., “Infuriating By Design”, Psychology Today, 22(3):52-56 (March 1988).

Norman, Donald A., The Psychology of Everyday Things, New York: Basic Book, Inc. 1988.

Norman, D. A., Fisher, D., “Why Alphabetic Keyboards Are Not Easy To Use: Keyboard Layout Doesn't Much Matter”, Human Factors 24(5), pp. 509-519 (1982).

O'Neal et al.; “Coding Isotropic Images”; November 1977; pp. 697-707.

Ohsuga et al, “Entrainment of Two Coupled van der Pol Oscillators by an External Oscillation”, Biological Cybernetics, 51:225-239 (1985).

Omata et al, “Holonic Model of Motion Perception”, IEICE Technical Reports, 3/26/88, pp. 339-346.

Optical Engineering 28:5 (May 1988)(Special Issue on product inspection).

Pawlicki, T. F., D. S. Lee, J. J. Hull and S. N. Srihari, “Neural Network Models and their Application to Handwritten Digit Recognition,” ICNN Proceeding, 1988, pp. II-63-70.

Perry et al.; “Auto-Indexing Storage Device”; IBM Tech. Disc. Bulletin, 12(8):1219 (January 1970).

Perspectives: High Technology 2, 1985.

Peterson, Ivars, “Packing It In-Fractals . . . ”, Science News, 131(18):283-285 (May 2, 1987).

Platte, Hans-Joachim, Obrkatzas, Gunter, and Voessing, Walter, “A New Intelligent Remote Control Unit for Consumer Electronic Device”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Vol. CE-31(1):59-68 (February 1985).

Press, William H. et al, “Numerical Recipes in C The Art of Scientific Computing”, Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Priebe, C. E.; Solka, J. L.; Rogers, G. W., “Discriminant analysis in aerial images using fractal based features”, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 1962: 196-208(1993).

Proakis, John G., Digital Communications, McGraw-Hill (1983)

Proceedings, 6th International Conference on Pattern Recognition 1982, pp. 152-136.

Psaltis, D., “Two-Dimensional Optical Processing Using One-Dimensional Input Devices”, Proceedings of the IEEE, 72(7):962-974 (July 1984).

Psaltis, D., “Incoherent Electro-Optic Image Correlator”, Optical Engineering, 23(1):12-15 (January/February 1984).

Rahrnati, M.; Hassebrook, L. G., “Intensity- and distortion-invariant pattern recognition with complex linear morphology”, Pattern Recognition, 27 (4):549-68(1994).

Ravichandran, G. and Casasent, D., “Noise and Discrimination Performance of the MINACE Optical Correlation Filter”, Proc. SPIE Technical Symposium, April 1990, Orlando Fla., 1471 (1990).

Reusens, E., “Sequence coding based on the fractal theory of iterated transformations systems”, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2094(pt. 1): 132-40(1993).

Rhodes, W., “Acousto-Optic Signal Processing: Convolution and Correlation”, Proc. of the IEEE, 69(1):65-79 (January 1981).

Richards J., and Casasent, D., “Real Time Hough Transform for Industrial Inspection” Proc. SPIE Technical Symposium, Boston 1989 1192:2-21 (1989).

Rogus, John G. and Armstrong, Richard, “Use of Human Engineering Standards in Design”, Human Factors, 19(1): 15-23 (February 1977).

Rosch, Winn L., “Voice Recognition: Understanding the Master's Voice”, PC Magazine, Oct. 27, 1987, 261-308.

Rosenfeld, Azriel and Avinash C. Kak; Digital Picture Processing, Second Edition, Volume 2, Academic Press, 1982.

Roy, B., “Classements et choix en presence de points de vue multiples”, R.I.R.O.-2eme annee-no. 8; pp. 57-75 (1968).

Roy, B., “Electre m: un algorithme de classements fonde sur une representation floue des preferences en presence de criteres multiples” Cahiers du CERO, 20(1):3-24 (1978).

Rumelhart, D. E., et al.; Parallel Distributed Processing, ((c) 1986: MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.), and specifically Chapter 8 thereof, “Learning Internal Representations by Error Propagation”; pp. 318-362.

Rumelhart, D. E., et al.; “Learning Internal Representations by Error Propagation”; Parallel Distr. Proc.: Explorations in Microstructure of Cognition, 1:318-362 (1986).

Rutherford, H. G., F. Taub and B. Williams; “Object Identification and Measurement from Images with Access to the Database to Select Specific Subpopulations of Special Interest”; May 1986.

Rutter et al.; “The Timed Lattice-A New Approach To Fast Converging Equalizer Design”; pp.VIII/11-5 (Inspec. Abstract No. 84C044315, Inspec IEE (London) & IEE Saraga Colloquium on Electronic Filters, May 21, 1984)

Sadjadi, F., “Experiments in the use of fractal in computer pattern recognition”, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 1960:214-22 (1993).

Sakoe, H.; “A Generalization of Dynamic Programming Based Pattern Matching Algorithm Stack DP-Matching”; Transactions of the Committee on Speech Research; The Acoustic Society of Japan; p. S83-23; 1983.

Sakoe, H.; “A Generalized Two-Level DP-Matching Algorithm for Continuous Speech Recognition”; Transactions of the IECE of Japan; E65(11):649-656 (November 1982).

Sarver, Carleton, “A Perfect Friendship”, High Fidelity, 39:42-49 (May 1989).

Scharlic, A., “Decider sur plusieurs criteres. Panorama de l'aide a la decision multicritere” Presses Polytechniques Romandes (1985).

Schmitt, Lee, “Let's Discuss Programmable Controllers”, Modern Machine Shop, May 1987, 90-99.

Schniederman, Ben, Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1987.

Schurmann, J.; “Zur Zeichen und Worterkennung beim Automatischen Anschriftenlesen”; Wissenschaftlichl, Berichte, 52(1/2) (1979).

Scientific American; “Not Just a Pretty Face”; March 1990, pp. 77-78.

Shafer, G., “A mathematical theory of evidence”, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1976).

Shimizu et al, “Principle of Holonic Computer and Holovision”, Journal of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication, 70(9):921-930 (1987).

Shinan et al., “The Effects of Voice Disguise . . . ”, ICASSP 86, Tokyo, CH2243-186/0000-0885, IEEE 1986, pp. 885-888.

Silverston et al.; “Spectral Feature Classification and Spatial Pattern Rec.”; SPIE 201:17-26, Optical Pattern Recognition (1979).

Simpson, W. R., C. S. Dowling; “WRAPLE: The Weighted Repair Assistance Program Learning Extension”; IEEE Design & Test, 2:66-73 (April 1986).

Smith, Sidney J., and Mosier, Jane N., Guidelines for Designing User Interface Software, Bedford, Mass.; MITRE, 1986.

Specht; IEEE Internatl. Conf. Neural Networks, 1:1525-1532 (July 1988); San Diego, Calif.

Sperling, Barbara Bied, Tullis Thomas S., “Are You a Better ‘Mouser’ or ‘Trackballer’? A Comparison of Cursor—Positioning Performance”, An Interactive/Poster Session at the CHI+GI'87 Graphics Interface and Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference.

Sprageu, R. A.; “A Review of Acousto-Optic Signal Correlators”; Optical Engineering; 16(5):467-74 (September/October 1977)

Sprinzak, J.; Werman, M., “Affine point matching”, Pattern Recognition Letters, 15(4):337-9(1994).

Stanley R. Sternberg; “Biomedical Image Processing”; IEEE Computer; 1983; pp. 22-34.

Stewart, R. M.; “Expert Systems For Mechanical Fault Diagnosis”; IEEE; 1985; pp. 295-300.

Streeter, L. A., Ackroff, J. M., and Taylor, G. A. “On Abbreviating Command Names”, The Bell System Technical Journal, 62(6):1807-1826 (July/August 1983).

Sugeno, M., “Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications”, Tokyo Institute of Technology (1974).

Svetkoff et al.; Hybrid Circuits (GB), No. 13, May 1987; pp. 5-8.

Swanson, David, and Klopfenstein, Bruce, “How to Forecast VCR Penetration”, American Demographic, December 1987, 44-45.

Tello, Ernest R., “Between Man And Machine”, Byte, September 1988, 288-293.

Thomas, John, C., and Schneider, Michael L., Human Factors in Computer Systems, New Jersey, Ablex Publ. Co., 1984.

Trachtenberg, Jeffrey A., “How do we confuse thee? Let us count the ways”, Forbes, Mar. 21, 1988, 159-160.

Tyldesley, D. A., “Employing Usability Engineering in the Development of Office Products”, The Computer Journal”, 31(5):431-436 (1988).

Udagawa, K., et al; “A Parallel Two-Stage Decision Method for Statistical Character Recognition . . . ”; Electronics and Communications in Japan (1965).

Vander Lugt, A., “Signal Detection By Complex Spatial Filtering”, IEEE Transactions On Information Theory, IT-10, 2:139-145 (April 1964).

Vander Lugt, A., et al.; “The Use of Film Nonlinearites in Optical Spatial Filtering”; Applied Optics; 9(1):215-222 (January 1970).

Vander Lugt, A.; “Practical Considerations for the Use of Spatial Carrier-Frequency Filters”; Applied Optics; 5(11):1760-1765 (November 1966).

Vannicola et al, “Applications of Knowledge based Systems to Surveillance”, Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE National Radar Conference, 20-21 April 1988, pp. 157-164.

Verplank, William L., “Graphics in Human-Computer Communication: Principles of Graphical User-Interface Design”, Xerox Office Systems.

Vitols; “Hologram Memory for Storing Digital Data”; IBM Tech. Disc. Bulletin 8(11):1581-1583 (April 1966).

Voyt, Carlton F., “PLC's Learn New Languages”, Design News, Jan. 2, 1989, 78.

Wald; Sequential Analysis; Dover Publications Inc., 1947; pp. 3-43.

Wasserman, Philip D.; “Neural Computing-Theory & Practice”; 1989; pp. 128-129.

Weshsler, H. Ed., “Neural Nets For Human and Machine Perception”, Academic Press, New York (1991).

Whitefield, A. “Human Factors Aspects of Pointing as an Input Technique in Interactive Computer Systems”, Applied Ergonomics, June 1986, 97-104.

Wiedenbeck, Susan, Lambert, Robin, and Scholtz, Jean, “Using Protocol Analysis to Study the User Interface”, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, June/July 1989, 25-26.

Wilke, William, “Easy Operation of Instruments by Both Man and Machine”, Electro/82 Proceedings, 3/2/1-3/2/4.

Willshaw et al.; “Non-Holographic Associative Memory”; Nature; 222:960-962 (Jun. 7, 1969).

Yager, R. R., “Entropy and specificity in a mathematical theory of Evidence”, Int. J. General Systems, 9:249-260 (1983).

Yamada et. al.; “Character recognition system using a neural network”; Electronics Information Communications Association Bulletin PRU 88-58, pp. 79-86.

Yamane et al.; “An Image Data Compression Method Using Two-Dimensional Extrapolative Prediction-Discrete Sine Transform”; Oct. 29-31, 1986; pp. 311-316.

Yoder, Stephen Kreider, “U.S. Inventors Thrive at Electronics Show”, The Wall Street Journal, Jan. 10, 1990, B1.

Zadeh, L. A., “Fuzzy sets”, Information and Control, 8:338-353 (1965).

Zadeh, L. A., “Probability measures of fuzzy events”, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 23:421-427 (1968).

Zadeh, L. A., “Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility”, Fuzzy sets and Systems 1:3-28 (1978).

Zeisel, Gunter, Tomas, Philippe, Tomaszewski, Peter, “An Interactive Menu-Driven Remote Control Unit for TV-Receivers and VC-Recorders”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 34(3):814-818.

Zhi-Yan Xie; Brady, M., “Fractal dimension image for texture segmentation”, ICARCV '92. Second International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Computer Vision, p. CV4.3/1-5 vol. 1, (1992).

Zhu, X., et al.; “Feature Detector and Application to Handwritten Character Recognition”; International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Washington, D.C.; January 1990; pp. II-457 to II-460.

Claims

1. A programmable control responsive to an user input and a signal received from a signal source, comprising:

a controller, operating according to a predetermined program, for receiving the user input and the signal and producing a control output, said controller producing a multivalued characterization of the signal with respect to at least one parameter;

a memory for storing data relating to an activity of the user;

a data processing system for predicting a most probable action of a user based on said stored data relating to said activity of the user and said characterized signal; and

a user feedback data presenting system comprising a display device for presentation of a sequence of programming options to the user, including said most probable action of the user, in a plurality of display images, each display image differing in available programming options.

2. The programmable control according to claim 1 being for performing an action based on user input and an information content of a signal received from a signal source, further comprising:

a user controlled direct manipulation-type input device, associated with said display device, having a device output, said device output being the user input;

a plant capable of performing a physical action, being responsive to an actuator signal; and

said controller, being for receiving data from said device output of said input device and a signal received from a signal source, and displaying user feedback data on said display device,

said user feedback data comprising a presentation of a sequence of programming options to the user on said display device, including said most probable action of the user, in a plurality of display images, each display image differing in available programming options, said sequence of programming options including at least one sequence of options sufficient to define an operable control program, and a presentation of additional programming options if said control program is not operable.

3. The system according to claim 1, being for processing a program comprising program material, in response to a viewer input, comprising:

a user input processing system for determining a viewer preference;

said controller comprises a program material processing system for characterizing the program material, as said characterized signal, based on its content;

a correlator for correlating said characterized content of the program material with said determined viewer preference to produce a correlation index; and

a processor, selectively processing the program material based on said correlation index,

wherein said viewer preference is an input to said data processing system, and

said data processing system comprises said correlator.

4. The system according to claim 3, wherein said program material is encrypted, further comprising:

a decryption system for decrypting the program material if it is selected to produce unencrypted program material and optionally an associated decryption event;

a memory for storing data relating to the occurrence of said decryption event; and

a central database for storing data relating to the occurrence of said decryption event in association with data relating to the viewer.

5. The system according to claim 3, wherein:

said user input processing system monitors a pattern of user activity and predicts a viewer preference;

said program material processing system comprises:

a processor for preprocessing the program material to produce a reduced data flow information signal substantially retaining information relating to an abstract information content of the program material and selectively eliminating data not relating to said abstract information content of the program material and for characterizing said information signal based on said abstract information content; and

a comparing system for determining if said correlation index is indicative of a probable high correlation between said characterization of said information signal and said viewer preference and causing said stored program material to be processed by said processor based on said determination.

6. The system according to claim 3, wherein said processor comprises an image program material storage and retrieval system.

7. The system according to claim 3, further comprising a memory for storing a characterization of the program material; an input for receiving a feedback signal from the viewer indicating a degree of agreement with said correlation index determination, wherein said feedback signal and said stored characterization are used by said user input processing system to predict a new viewer preference.

8. The system according to claim 3, wherein said a program material processing system correlates and characterizes image information, further comprising:

means for storing template data;

means for storing the image data;

means for generating a plurality of addressable domains from the stored image data, each of the domains representing a different portion of the image information;

means for creating, from the stored image data, a plurality of addressable mapped ranges corresponding to different subsets of the stored image data, the creating means including means for executing, for each of the mapped ranges, a procedure upon the one of the subsets of the stored image data which corresponds to the mapped range;

means for assigning identifiers to corresponding ones of the mapped ranges, each of the identifiers specifying for the corresponding mapped range an address of the corresponding subset of stored image data;

means for selecting, for each of the domains, the one of the mapped ranges which most closely corresponds according to predetermined criteria;

means for representing at least a portion of the image information as a set of the identifiers of the selected mapped ranges; and

means for selecting, from the stored templates, a template which most closely corresponds to the set of identifiers representing the image information.

9. The system according to claim 8 wherein said correspondence of a template and the set of identifiers is determined by a processor executing a predetermined program for executing an algorithm selected from at least one of the group consisting of algorithms for selecting a minimum Hausdorff distance between the mapped range and the domain, for selecting the highest cross-correlation of the mapped range with the domain, and for selecting the lowest mean square error of the difference between the mapped range and the domain.

10. The system according to claim 9 wherein said correspondence of a template trial and the set of identifiers is determined by selecting, for each domain, the mapped range with the minimum modified Hausdorff distance calculated as D[db,mrb]+D[1−db,1−mrb], where D is a distance calculated between a pair of sets of data each representative of an image, db is a domain, mrb is a mapped range, I−db is the inverse of a domain, and I-mrb is an inverse of a mapped range.

11. The system according to claim 8, wherein said means for representing further comprises means for:

(a) determining a feature of interest of the image data,

(b) selecting a mapped range corresponding to the feature of interest,

(c) storing the identifiers of the selected mapped range,

(d) selecting a further mapped range corresponding to a portion of image data having a predetermined relationship to the feature of interest, and

(e) storing the identifiers of the further mapped range.

12. The system according to claim 8, wherein said image data comprises data having three associated dimensions obtained by an image processor executing an algorithm selected from the group consisting of an algorithm for synthesizing a three dimensional representation based on a machine based prediction derived from two dimensional image data, an algorithm for synthesizing a three dimensional representation derived from a time series of pixel images, and an algorithm for synthesizing a three dimensional representation based on a image data representing a plurality of parallax views having at least two dimensions, said set of identifiers representing data in each of the three associated dimensions.

13. A method of programming a device, comprising the steps of:

providing an input for user commands and feedback;

storing information relating to the user commands and feedback in a memory;

providing a data input for external information;

predicting a subsequent user command based on the stored information relating to user commands and feedback, a status of the device, and external information from the data input;

presenting the predicted user command to the user;

accepting feedback from the user relating to the predicted subsequent user command;

modifying the predicted subsequent user command based on at least the feedback; and

executing the modified predicted user command.

14. The method according to claim 13, further comprising the step of identifying a user and storing an user identifier with said stored information relating to the user commands;

said predicting step predicting a subsequent user command based on the stored information relating to user identifier, commands and feedback, a status of the device, and external information from the data input.

15. A programmable device comprising:

a user input for receiving an input variable having a path between a first input state and a second input state, said user input comprising:

path dependent user data having transitional path information between said first input state and said second input state; and

path independent user data comprising information about at least one of said first state and said second state;

a filter, separating sad path dependent user data as user characterization data and said path independent user data as instructions;

a memory for storing said user characterization data;

a processor for executing said instructions; and

a feedback device, presenting information relating to said instructions and said stored user characterization data.

16. The device according to claim 15, further comprising:

a hierarchical command structure of said processor, said command structure having commands of different function; and

means for predicting a probability of execution of a plurality of commands based on said input,

said feedback device presenting commands based on at least said predicted probabilities.

17. The programmable control according to claim 1, wherein the signal comprises image information.

18. The method according to claim 13, wherein said stored information comprises a set of weights of a predictive algorithm.

19. The method according to claim 13, herein said external information comprises a perceptual data stream.

20. The programmable device according to claim 15, wherein a format of information presented from said feedback device is based on said path dependent user data.

21. A method for sending targeted content to a mobile device, the method comprising:

identifying a user profile associated with a mobile device based on information received from the mobile device;

receiving a position of the mobile device, wherein the mobile device calculated the position using a positioning system;

selecting, based on the user profile and the position of the mobile device, customized information; and

sending, for display on the mobile device, the customized information to the mobile device.

22. The method of claim 21, wherein the information received from the mobile device includes preferences information, and wherein selecting further comprises:

selecting, based on the preferences information, the customized information.

23. The method of claim 21, wherein the customized information comprises an advertisement.

24. The method of claim 23, wherein the advertisement concerns food.

25. The method of claim 23, wherein the advertisement concerns fuel.

26. The method of claim 23, wherein the advertisement concerns lodging.

27. The method of claim 21, wherein the positioning system is a geographic positioning system (GPS).

28. The method of claim 21, wherein the positioning system is a cellular base station.

29. The method of claim 21, wherein the information received from the mobile device includes user preferences information, and wherein sending further comprises:

sending one or more customized billboards to the mobile device dependent on demographics of a user associated with the user profile, dependent on the position of the mobile device, and dependent on the user preferences information.

30. The method of claim 21, wherein the information received from the mobile device includes an itinerary, the method further comprising:

generating the customized information dependent on the itinerary.

31. The method of claim 21, further comprising communicating with the mobile device based on the position of the mobile device and an itinerary for vehicle travel, wherein the itinerary relates to the customized information.

32. The method of claim 21, wherein the customized information is referred to as first customized information, and the mobile device is referred to as a first mobile device, the method further comprising:

sending, for display on a second mobile device, second customized information.

33. The method of claim 32, the positioning system is referred to as a first positioning system, the method further comprising:

receiving a position of the second mobile device, wherein the second mobile device calculated the position of the second mobile device using a second positioning system; and

selecting, based on the position of the second mobile device, the second customized information.

34. The method of claim 33, wherein the user profile is referred to as a first user profile, and wherein the second customized information includes advertising information, the method further comprising:

identifying a second user profile associated with the second mobile device based on information received from the second mobile device;

selecting, based on the second user profile, the second customized information; and

sending the second customized information including the advertising information to the second mobile device.

35. The method of claim 34, wherein at least one of the first mobile device or the second mobile device is a phone.

36. The method of claim 21, further comprising controlling, based on the user profile, interaction with a user of the mobile device.

37. The method of claim 21, further comprising receiving feedback from a user associated with the mobile device via a touch screen of the mobile device, wherein the feedback is related to the customized information.

38. The method of claim 37, wherein the feedback relates to an advertisement contained in the customized information.

39. The method of claim 21, further comprising:

receiving, in a user interaction, instructions from a user associated with the mobile device, wherein the instructions relate to the customized information;

providing, in the user interaction, feedback to the user; and

recording a result of the user interaction.

40. A system for sending targeted content to a mobile device, the system comprising:

a receiver configured to receive a position of the mobile device, wherein the mobile device calculated the position using a positioning system;

a processor configured to:

identify a user profile associated with the mobile device based on information received from the mobile device; and

select, based on the user profile and the position of the mobile device, customized information; and

a transmitter configured to send, for display on the mobile device, the customized information to the mobile device.

41. The system of claim 40, wherein:

the receiver is configured to receive a request for the customized information; and

the transmitter is configured to send the customized information from a provider to the mobile device, wherein the customized information is dependent on the position of the mobile device, as determined by the positioning system during a time period associated with receiving the request, and dependent on at least one of the user profile or preferences information.

42. The system of claim 41, wherein the customized information is an advertisement.

43. The system of claim 42, wherein the advertisement concerns food.

44. The system of claim 42, wherein the advertisement concerns fuel.

45. The system of claim 42, wherein the advertisement concerns lodging.

46. The system of claim 41, wherein:

the positioning system is a geographic positioning system (GPS); and

the GPS is configured to determine the position of the mobile device.

47. The system of claim 41, wherein:

the positioning system is a cellular base station; and

the cellular base station is configured to determine the position of the mobile device.

48. The system of claim 41, wherein:

the preferences information includes user preferences information; and

the transmitter is configured to send one or more customized billboards to the mobile device dependent on demographics of one or more users associated with the mobile device, dependent on the position of the mobile device, and dependent on the user preferences information.

49. The system of claim 41, wherein:

the mobile device is a cellular phone; and

the cellular phone includes a display device.

50. The system of claim 49, wherein the display device includes a touch screen.

51. The system of claim 49, wherein the display device includes an interactive interface configured to receive instructions from one or more users and to display user feedback.

52. The system of claim 49, wherein the display device is a video display.

53. The system of claim 41, wherein the mobile device includes a gyroscope.

54. The system of claim 41, wherein the user profile includes a demographic profile.

55. The system of claim 41, wherein the mobile device is configured to identify one or more users based on a biometric.

56. The system of claim 55, wherein the biometric is at least one of a fingerprint, a voice sample, or a video pattern.

57. The system of claim 55, wherein the biometric comprises a fingerprint scan performed by the mobile device.

58. The system of claim 41, wherein the customized information includes an advertisement.

59. The system of claim 41, wherein the customized information includes a plurality of advertisements.

60. The system of claim 41, wherein the customized information is configured to be sent via a cellular network.

61. The system of claim 41, wherein a display device of the mobile device includes a touch screen display.

62. The system of claim 61, wherein the touch screen display is configured to display a graphical user interface.

63. The system of claim 41, wherein the user profile is based at least in part on prior actions of one or more users of the mobile device.