A method and apparatus are provided for monitoring a fuel delivery system to limit acidic corrosion. An exemplary monitoring system includes a controller, at least one monitor, and an output. The monitoring system may collect and analyze data indicative of a corrosive environment in the fuel delivery system. The monitoring system may also automatically warn an operator of the fueling station of the corrosive environment so that the operator can take preventative or corrective action.

Patent
   RE48204
Priority
Aug 22 2012
Filed
Aug 30 2018
Issued
Sep 15 2020
Expiry
Aug 13 2033
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
0
72
currently ok
1. A fuel delivery system comprising:
a storage tank containing a fuel product;
a fuel delivery line in communication with the storage tank and with a fuel dispenser for dispensing the fuel product to a consumer;
at least one monitor that collects data indicative of a corrosive environment in the fuel delivery system, wherein the at least one monitor is an electrical monitor comprising:
a target material configured to be exposed to a sample from the fuel delivery system;
an energy source directing an electrical current through the target material; and
a sensor configured to detect a decrease in the electrical current through the target material, the decrease in electrical current indicating the presence of a corrosive environment in the fuel delivery system; and
a controller in communication with the at least one monitor to receive collected data from the at least one monitor, the controller being programmed to issue a warning based on the collected data from the at least one monitor, wherein the controller is programmed to issue the warning based on a decrease in the electrical current through the target material.
0. 20. A fuel delivery system comprising:
a storage tank containing a fuel product;
a fuel delivery line in communication with the storage tank and with a fuel dispenser for dispensing the fuel product to a consumer;
at least one monitor positioned in a vapor space of the fuel delivery system that collects data indicative of a corrosive environment including acetic acid in the vapor space of the fuel delivery system, wherein the at least one monitor comprises:
a metallic target material configured to be exposed to a sample from the fuel delivery system, the metallic target material being susceptible to acidic corrosion such that the metallic target material corrodes when exposed to the acetic acid in the fuel delivery system before the fuel delivery system corrodes; and
a sensor configured to detect the corrosion of the target material; and
a controller in communication with the at least one monitor to receive collected data from the at least one monitor, the controller being programmed to issue a warning based on the collected data from the at least one monitor, wherein the controller is programmed to issue the warning based on the detected corrosion of the target material.
8. A fuel delivery system comprising:
a storage tank containing a fuel product;
a fuel delivery line in communication with the storage tank and with a fuel dispenser for dispensing the fuel product to a consumer;
at least one monitor that collects positioned in a vapor space of the fuel delivery system, the at least one monitor configured to collect data indicative of a corrosive environment in a vapor sample from the vapor space of the fuel delivery system, wherein the at least one monitor is an electrical monitor comprising:
at least two opposing, charged metal plates; and
a sensor operatively connected to the two opposing, charged metal plates configured to determine a measured value of an electrical property of a the vapor sample from the vapor space of the fuel delivery system positioned between the at least two opposing, charged metal plates, the electrical property having a predetermined value indicating the presence of a corrosive environment in the vapor space of the fuel delivery system; and
a controller in communication with the at least one monitor to receive collected data from the at least one monitor, the controller being programmed to issue a warning indicating the presence of the corrosive environment in the vapor space of the fuel delivery system based on the collected data from the at least one monitor, wherein the controller is programmed to issue the warning based on a comparison of the predetermined value and the measured value of the electrical property.
2. The fuel delivery system of claim 1, further comprising at least one underground sump that houses a portion of the fuel delivery line, wherein the at least one monitor is positioned in the at least one underground sump to collect data regarding at least one of a liquid or a vapor sample present in the at least one underground sump.
3. The fuel delivery system of claim 1, wherein the at least one monitor is positioned in the storage tank to collect data regarding at least one of the fuel product or a vapor present in the storage tank.
4. The fuel delivery system of claim 1, wherein the controller is programmed to issue: a first warning when the at least one monitor measures a relatively low corrosion level; and a second warning more severe than the first warning when the at least one monitor measures a relatively high corrosion level.
5. The fuel delivery system of claim 1, wherein the target material comprises at least one material susceptible to acidic corrosion selected from the group consisting of copper and low carbon steel.
6. A method of monitoring the fuel delivery system of claim 1, the method comprising the steps of: directing the fuel product from the storage tank to the fuel dispenser via the fuel delivery line collecting data indicative of a corrosive environment in the fuel delivery system with the monitor; and issuing the warning based on the collected data.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein said collecting step further comprises: drawing the sample from the fuel the delivery system; and testing the drawn sample to measure a property indicative of the presence of a corrosive environment.
9. The fuel delivery system of claim 8, further comprising at least one underground sump that houses a portion of the fuel delivery line, wherein the at least one monitor is positioned in the vapor space of the at least one underground sump to collect data regarding at least one of a liquid or a vapor sample present in the at least one underground sump.
10. The fuel delivery system of claim 8, wherein the at least one monitor is positioned in the vapor space of the storage tank to collect data regarding at least one of the fuel product or a vapor present in the storage tank.
11. The fuel delivery system of claim 8, wherein the controller is programmed to issue: a first warning when the at least one monitor measures a relatively low corrosion level; and a second warning more severe than the first warning when the at least one monitor measures a relatively high corrosion level.
12. A method of monitoring the fuel delivery system of claim 8, the method comprising the steps of:
directing the fuel product from the storage tank to the fuel dispenser via the fuel delivery line;
collecting data indicative of a the corrosive environment in the vapor space of the fuel delivery system with the monitor; and
issuing the warning based on the collected data.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein said collecting step further comprises:
drawing the vapor sample from the vapor space of the fuel delivery system; and
testing the drawn vapor sample to measure a property indicative of the presence of a the corrosive environment.
0. 14. A fuel delivery system comprising:
a storage tank containing a fuel product;
a fuel delivery line in communication with the storage tank and with a fuel dispenser for dispensing the fuel product to a consumer;
at least one monitor that collects data indicative of a corrosive environment in the fuel delivery system, wherein the at least one monitor is a microbial monitor comprising:
a microbial detector configured to expose a sample from the fuel delivery system to a flurogenic enzyme substrate and measure a concentration of fluorescence produced from bacteria cleaved to the flurogenic enzyme substrate, where the concentration of fluorescence having a predetermined value indicating the presence of a corrosive environment in the fuel delivery system; and
a controller in communication with the at least one monitor to receive collected data from the at least one monitor, the controller being programmed to issue a warning based on the collected data from the at least one monitor, wherein the controller is programmed to issue the warning based on the measured concentration of fluorescence.
0. 15. The fuel delivery system of claim 14, further comprising at least one underground sump that houses a portion of the fuel delivery line, wherein the at least one monitor is positioned in the at least one underground sump to collect data regarding at least one of a liquid or a vapor sample present in the at least one underground sump.
0. 16. The fuel delivery system of claim 14, wherein the at least one monitor is positioned in the storage tank to collect data regarding at least one of the fuel product or a vapor present in the storage tank.
0. 17. The fuel delivery system of claim 14, wherein the controller is programmed to issue: a first warning when the at least one monitor measures a relatively low corrosion level; and a second warning more severe than the first warning when the at least one monitor measures a relatively high corrosion level.
0. 18. A method of monitoring the fuel delivery system of claim 14, the method comprising the steps of: directing the fuel product from the storage tank to the fuel dispenser via the fuel delivery line; collecting data indicative of a corrosive environment in the fuel delivery system with the monitor; and issuing the warning based on the collected data.
0. 19. The method of claim 18, wherein said collecting step further comprises: drawing the sample from the fuel the delivery system; and testing the drawn sample to measure a property indicative of the presence of a corrosive environment.
0. 21. The fuel delivery system of claim 20, wherein the metallic target material comprises copper or low carbon steel.
0. 22. The fuel delivery system of claim 20, wherein the metallic target material is a thin film or wire.
0. 23. The fuel delivery system of claim 20, wherein the sensor is a camera.
0. 24. The fuel delivery system of claim 20, wherein the at least one monitor is positioned in the vapor space of an underground sump or the vapor space of the storage tank.
0. 25. The fuel delivery system of claim 20, further comprising an energy source that directs an electrical current through the target material, the sensor being configured to detect the electrical current traveling through the target material.

This application
CH3COO+H+→CH3COOH  (II)

The conversion of ethanol to acetic acid may also occur in the presence of oxygen according to Reaction III below.
2CH3CH2OH+O2→2CH3COOH+2H2O  (III)

Acetic acid producing bacteria may produce acetate and acetic acid by a metabolic fermentation process, which is used commercially to produce vinegar, for example. Acetic acid producing bacteria generally belong to the Acetobacteraceae family, which includes the genera Acetobacter and Gluconobacter. Acetic acid producing bacteria are very prevalent in nature and may be present in the soil around fuel delivery system 10, for example. Such bacteria may find their way into sumps 30, 32 to drive Reactions I-III above, such as when soil or debris falls into sumps 30, 32 or when rainwater seeps into sumps 30, 32.

The products of Reactions I-III above may reach equilibrium in sumps 30, 32, with some of the acetate and acetic acid dissolving into liquid water that is present in sumps 30, 32, and some of the acetate and acetic acid volatilizing into a vapor state. In general, the amount acetate or acetic acid that is present in the vapor state is proportional to the amount of acetate or acetic acid that is present in the liquid state (i.e, the more acetate or acetic acid that is present in the vapor state, the more acetate or acetic acid that is present in the liquid state).

Even though acetic acid is classified as a weak acid, it may be corrosive to fuel delivery system 10, especially at high concentrations. For example, the acetic acid may react to deposit metal oxides (e.g., rust) or metal acetates on metallic fittings of fuel delivery system 10. Because Reactions I-III are microbiologically-influenced reactions, these deposits in fuel delivery system 10 may be tubular or globular in shape.

To limit corrosion in fuel delivery system 10, a monitoring system 100 and a corresponding monitoring method are provided herein. As shown in FIG. 3, the illustrative monitoring system 100 includes controller 102, one or more monitors 104 in communication with controller 102, and output 106 in communication with controller 102, each of which is described further below.

Controller 102 of monitoring system 100 illustratively includes a microprocessor 110 (e.g., a central processing unit (CPU)) and an associated memory 112. Controller 102 may be any type of computing device capable of accessing a computer-readable medium having one or more sets of instructions (e.g., software code) stored therein and executing the instructions to perform one or more of the sequences, methodologies, procedures, or functions described herein. In general, controller 102 may access and execute the instructions to collect, sort, and/or analyze data from monitor 104, determine an appropriate response, and communicate the response to output 106. Controller 102 is not limited to being a single computing device, but rather may be a collection of computing devices (e.g., a collection of computing devices accessible over a network) which together execute the instructions. The instructions and a suitable operating system for executing the instructions may reside within memory 112 of controller 102, for example. Memory 112 may also be configured to store real-time and historical data and measurements from monitors 104, as well as reference data. Memory 112 may store information in database arrangements, such as arrays and look-up tables.

Controller 102 of monitoring system 100 may be part of a larger controller that controls the rest of fuel delivery system 10. In this embodiment, controller 102 may be capable of operating and communicating with other components of fuel delivery system 10, such as dispenser 12 (FIG. 1), pump 20 (FIG. 2), and leak detector 34 (FIG. 2), for example. An exemplary controller 102 is the TS-550 Fuel Management System available from Franklin Fueling Systems Inc. of Madison, Wis.

Monitor 104 of monitoring system 100 is configured to automatically and routinely collect data indicative of a corrosive environment in fuel delivery system 10. In operation, monitor 104 may draw in a liquid or vapor sample from fuel delivery system 10 and directly test the sample or test a target material that has been exposed to the sample, for example. In certain embodiments, monitor 104 operates continuously, collecting samples and measuring data approximately once every second or minute, for example. Monitor 104 is also configured to communicate the collected data to controller 102. In certain embodiments, monitor 104 manipulates the data before sending the data to controller 102. In other embodiments, monitor 104 sends the data to controller 102 in raw form for manipulation by controller 102. The illustrative monitor 104 is wired to controller 102, but it is also within the scope of the present disclosure that monitor 104 may communicate wirelessly (e.g., via an internet network) with controller 102.

Depending on the type of data being collected by each monitor 104, the location of each monitor 104 in fuel delivery system 10 may vary. Returning to the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 2, for example, monitor 104′ is positioned in the liquid space (e.g, middle or bottom) of storage tank 16 to collect data regarding the liquid fuel product 14 in storage tank 16, monitor 104″ is positioned in the ullage or vapor space (e.g., top) of storage tank 16 to collect data regarding any vapors present in storage tank 16, monitor 104′″ is positioned in the liquid space (e.g., bottom) of turbine sump 32 to collect data regarding any liquids present in turbine sump 32, and monitor 104″″ is positioned in the vapor space (e.g., top) of turbine sump 32 to collect data regarding any vapors present in turbine sump 32. Monitor 104 may be positioned in other suitable locations of fuel delivery system 10, including delivery line 18 and dispenser sump 30 (FIG. 1), for example. Various monitors 104 for use in monitoring system 100 of FIG. 3 are discussed further below.

Output 106 of monitoring system 100 is capable of communicating an alarm or warning from controller 102 to an operator. Output 106 may be in the form of a visual indication device (e.g., a gauge, a display screen, lights, a printer), an audio indication device (e.g., a speaker, an audible alarm), a tactile indication device, or another suitable device for communicating information to the operator, as well as combinations thereof. The illustrative output 106 is wired to controller 102, but it is also within the scope of the present disclosure that output 106 may communicate wirelessly (e.g., via an internet network) with controller 102. To facilitate communication between output 106 and the operator, output 106 may be located in the operator's control room or office, for example.

In operation, and as discussed above, controller 102 collects, sorts, and/or analyzes data from monitor 104, determines an appropriate response, and communicates the response to output 106. According to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, output 106 warns the operator of a corrosive environment in fuel delivery system 10 before the occurrence of any corrosion or any significant corrosion in fuel delivery system 10. In this embodiment, corrosion may be prevented or minimized. It is also within the scope of the present disclosure that output 106 may alert the operator to the occurrence of corrosion in fuel delivery system 10 to at least avoid further corrosion.

Various factors may influence whether controller 102 issues an alarm or warning from output 106 that a corrosive environment is present in fuel delivery system 10. One factor includes the concentration of acidic molecules in fuel delivery system 10, with controller 102 issuing an alarm or warning from output 106 when the measured concentration of acidic molecules in fuel delivery system 10 exceeds an acceptable concentration of acidic molecules in fuel delivery system 10. The concentration may be expressed in various units. For example, controller 102 may activate output 106 when the measured concentration of acidic molecules in fuel delivery system 10 exceeds 25 ppm, 50 ppm, 100 ppm, 150 ppm, 200 ppm, or more, or when the measured concentration of acidic molecules in fuel delivery system 10 exceeds 25 mg/L, 50 mg/L, 100 mg/L, 150 mg/L, 200 mg/L, or more. At or beneath the acceptable concentration, corrosion in fuel to delivery system 10 may be limited. Another factor includes the concentration of hydrogen ions in fuel delivery system 10, with controller 102 issuing an alarm or warning from output 106 when the measured concentration of hydrogen ions in fuel delivery system 10 exceeds an acceptable concentration of hydrogen ions in fuel delivery system 10. For example, controller 102 may activate output 106 when the hydrogen ion concentration causes the pH in fuel delivery system 10 to drop below 5, 4, 3, or 2, for example. Within the acceptable pH range, corrosion in fuel delivery system 10 may be limited. Yet another factor includes the concentration of bacteria in fuel delivery system 10, with controller 102 issuing an alarm or warning from output 106 when the measured concentration of bacteria in fuel delivery system 10 exceeds an acceptable concentration of bacteria in fuel delivery system 10. At or beneath the acceptable concentration, the production of corrosive materials in fuel delivery system 10 may be limited.

Controller 102 may be programmed to progressively vary the alarm or warning communication from output 106 as the risk of corrosion in fuel delivery system 10 increases. For example, controller 102 may automatically trigger a minor alarm (e.g., a blinking light) when monitor 104 detects a relatively low acid concentration level (e.g., 5 ppm) in fuel delivery system 10, a moderate alarm (e.g., an audible alarm) when monitor 104 detects a moderate acid concentration level (e.g., 10 ppm) in fuel delivery system 10, and a severe alarm (e.g., a telephone call or an e-mail to the gas station operator) when monitor 104 detects a relatively high acid concentration level (e.g., 25 ppm) in fuel delivery system 10.

The alarm or warning communication from output 106 allows the operator to take precautionary or corrective measures to limit corrosion of fuel delivery system 10. For example, if an alarm or warning communication is signaled from turbine sump 32 (FIG. 2), the operator may remove manhole cover 39 and lid 38 to clean turbine sump 32, which may involve removing bacteria and potentially corrosive liquids and vapors from turbine sump 32. As another example, the operator may inspect fuel delivery system 10 for a liquid leak or a vapor leak that allowed ethanol and/or its acidic reaction products to enter turbine sump 32 in the first place.

As discussed above, monitoring system 100 includes one or more monitors 104 that collect data indicative of a corrosive environment in fuel delivery system 10. Each monitor 104 may vary in the type of data that is collected, the type of sample that is evaluated for testing, and the location of the sample that is evaluated for testing, as exemplified below.

In one embodiment, monitor 104 collects electrical data indicative of a corrosive environment in fuel delivery system 10. An exemplary electrical monitor 104a is shown in FIG. 4 and includes an energy source 120, a corrosive target material 122 that is exposed to a liquid or vapor sample S from fuel delivery system 10, and a sensor 124. Target material 122 may be designed to corrode before the equipment of fuel delivery system 10 corrodes. Target material 122 may be constructed of or coated with a material that is susceptible to acidic corrosion, such as copper or low carbon steel. Also, target material 122 may be relatively thin or small in size compared to the equipment of fuel delivery system 10 such that even a small amount of corrosion will impact the structural integrity of target material 122. For example, target material 122 may be in the form of a thin film or wire.

In use, energy source 120 directs an electrical current through target material 122. When target material 122 is intact, sensor 124 senses the electrical current traveling through target material 122. However, when exposure to sample S causes target material 122 to corrode and potentially break, sensor 124 will sense a decreased electrical current, or no current, traveling through target material 122. It is also within the scope of the present disclosure that the corrosion and/or breakage of target material 122 may be detected visually, such as by using a camera as sensor 124. First monitor 104a may share the data collected by sensor 124 with controller 102 (FIG. 3) to signal a corrosive environment in fuel delivery system 10.

Another exemplary electrical monitor 104b is shown in FIG. 5 and includes opposing, charged metal plates 130. The electrical monitor 104b operates by measuring electrical properties (e.g., capacitance, impedance) of a liquid or vapor sample S that has been withdrawn from fuel delivery system 10. In the case of a capacitance monitor 104b, for example, the sample S is directed between plates 130. Knowing the size of plates 130 and the distance between plates 130, the dielectric constant of the sample S may be calculated. As the quantity of acetate or acetic acid in the sample S varies, the dielectric constant of the sample S may also vary. The electrical monitor 104b may share the collected data with controller 102 (FIG. 3) to signal a corrosive environment in fuel delivery system 10.

In another embodiment, monitor 104 collects electrochemical data indicative of a corrosive environment in fuel delivery system 10. An exemplary electrochemical monitor (not shown) performs potentiometric titration of a sample that has been withdrawn from fuel delivery system 10. A suitable potentiometric titration device includes an electrochemical cell with an indicator electrode and a reference electrode that maintains a consistent electrical potential. As a titrant is added to the sample and the electrodes interact with the sample, the electric potential across the sample is measured. Potentiometric or chronopotentiometric sensors, which may be based on solid-state reversible oxide films, such as that of iridium, may be used to measure potential in the cell. As the concentration of acetate or acetic acid in the sample varies, the potential may also vary. The potentiometric titration device may share the collected data with controller 102 (FIG. 3) to signal a corrosive environment in fuel delivery system 10. An electrochemical monitor may also operate by exposing the sample to an electrode, performing a reduction-oxidation with the sample at the electrode, and measuring the resulting current, for example.

In yet another embodiment, monitor 104 collects optical data indicative of a corrosive environment in fuel delivery system 10. An exemplary optical monitor 104c is shown in FIG. 6 and includes a light source 140, an optical target material 142 that is exposed to a liquid or vapor sample S from fuel delivery system 10, and an optical detector 144. Target material 142 may be constructed of or coated with a material (e.g., an acid-sensitive polymer) that changes optical properties (e.g., color) in the presence of H+ protons from the sample S. Suitable target materials 142 include pH indicators that change color when target material 142 is exposed to an acidic pH, such as a pH less than about 5, 4, 3, or 2, for example. The optical properties of target material 142 may be configured to change before the equipment of fuel delivery system 10 corrodes. Detector 144 may use optical fibers as the sensing element (i.e., intrinsic sensors) or as a means of relaying signals to a remote sensing element (i.e., extrinsic sensors).

In use, light source 140 directs a beam of light toward target material 142. Before target material 142 changes color, for example, detector 144 may detect a certain reflection, transmission (i.e., spectrophotometry), absorbtion (i.e., densitometry), and/or refraction of the the light beam from target material 142. However, after target material 142 changes color, detector 144 will detect a different reflection, transmission, absorbtion, and/or refraction of the the light beam. It is also within the scope of the present disclosure that the changes in target material 142 may be detected visually, such as by using a camera as detector 144. Third monitor 104c may share the data collected by detector 144 with controller 102 (FIG. 3) to signal a corrosive environment in fuel delivery system 10.

In still yet another embodiment, monitor 104 collects spectroscopic data indicative of a corrosive environment in fuel delivery system 10. An exemplary spectrometer (not shown) operates by subjecting a liquid or vapor sample from fuel delivery system 10 to an energy source and measuring the radiative energy as a function of its wavelength and/or frequency. Suitable spectrometers include, for example, infrared (IR) electromagnetic spectrometers, ultraviolet (UV) electromagnetic spectrometers, gas Chromatography-mass spectrometers (GC-MS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrometers. Suitable spectrometers may detect absorption from a ground state to an excited state, and/or fluorescence from the excited state to the ground state. The spectroscopic data may be represented by a spectrum showing the radiative energy as a function of wavelength and/or frequency. It is within the scope of the present disclosure that the spectrum may be edited to hone in on certain impurities in the sample, such as acetate and acetic acid, which may cause corrosion in fuel delivery system 10, as well as sulfuric acid, which may cause odors in fuel delivery system 10. As the impurities develop in fuel delivery system 10, peaks corresponding to the impurities would form and/or grow on the spectrum. The spectrometer may share the collected data with controller 102 (FIG. 3) to signal a corrosive environment in fuel delivery system 10.

In still yet another embodiment, monitor 104 collects microbial data indicative of a corrosive environment in fuel delivery system 10. An exemplary microbial detector (not shown) operates by exposing a liquid or vapor sample from fuel delivery system 10 to a fluorogenic enzyme substrate, incubating the sample and allowing any bacteria in the sample to cleave the enzyme substrate, and measuring fluorescence produced by the cleaved enzyme substrate. The concentration of the fluorescent product may be directly related to the concentration of acetic acid producing bacteria (e.g., Acetobacter, Gluconobacter) in the sample. Suitable microbial detectors are commercially available from Mycometer, Inc. of Tampa, Fla. The microbial detector may share the collected data with controller 102 (FIG. 3) to signal a corrosive environment in fuel delivery system 10.

While this invention has been described as having exemplary designs, the present invention can be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. This application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this invention pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.

Sabo, Lorraine Vander Wielen, Nelson, William

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
10239745, Jan 18 2016 Veeder-Root Company Fueling station sump dehumidifying system
2853149,
3885588,
3908690,
3915206,
3952781, Jan 27 1975 MARLEY-WYLAIN COMPANY THE Liquid dispensing and vapor recovery system and a vapor flow control unit used therein
4620669, Aug 22 1985 Wagner Spray Tech Corporation Blow-by circuit
4760863, Jun 16 1986 Pressure vacuum valve, more particularly to the storage tanks for volatile liquids
4770317, May 15 1987 EMCO WHEATON RETAIL CORPORATION, A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION Automatic overfill prevention system
4951844, Dec 14 1989 MODERN WELDING COMPANY, INC Double walled cylindrical-shaped storage tank with independent monitoring of tank areas
5122264, Jan 11 1991 FACET QUANTEK, INC , A CORP OF DE Liquid fuel dispensing system including a filtration vessel within a sump
5156047, Aug 30 1990 TANKNOLOGY INC Water sensor that detects tanks or vessel leakage
5160605, Apr 10 1991 Valiant Corporation Device for separating hydrocarbon products from water with venturi jet pump
5376215, Apr 27 1991 Shin-Etsu Handotai Co., Ltd. Apparatus for production of extremely thin SOI film substrate
5409025, Oct 06 1993 Semler Industries Inc. Apparatus and method for cleaning underground liquid fuel storage tanks
5490490, Apr 27 1995 UNIVERITY OF ROCHESTER On-board gas composition sensor for internal combustion engine exhaust gases
5586586, Dec 10 1992 EUROTANK SYSTEMS, LLC Unitized fuel storage system
6374187, Mar 19 1999 SIMMONS SIRVEY CORP Underground storage tank monitoring system and method
6811681, Nov 12 2002 APPLIED SEMICONDUCTOR INTERNATIONAL LTD Semiconductive corrosion and fouling control apparatus, system, and method
6907899, Jan 22 2003 Ford Global Technologies, LLC Saddle tank fuel delivery system
7051579, May 11 2004 FRANKLIN FUELING SYSTEMS, LLC Method and apparatus for continuously monitoring interstitial regions in gasoline storage facilities and pipelines
7114490, Sep 24 2004 Millennium Industries Multiple pump fuel delivery system
7523770, Dec 12 2005 ExxonMobil Research And Enginnering Company Service station for serving requirements of multiple vehicle technologies
7704383, Oct 16 2007 JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC Portable fuel desulfurization unit
7726336, Oct 11 2003 Veeder-Root Company Siphon system for a submersible turbine pump that pumps fuel from an underground storage tank
7883627, Oct 31 2008 Automated fuel polishing system and methods
8141577, Aug 01 2006 FRANKLIN FUELING SYSTEMS, LLC Liquid filled pressure/vacuum valve for petroleum underground storage tanks
8282023, May 03 2005 MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC Fluid storage and dispensing systems, and fluid supply processes comprising same
8290111, Sep 28 2004 Areva NP GmbH Electrochemical corrosion potential device and method
8417188, Feb 03 2009 iRobot Corporation Systems and methods for inspection and communication in liquid petroleum product
9428375, Aug 22 2012 FRANKLIN FUELING SYSTEMS, LLC Method and apparatus for limiting acidic corrosion in fuel delivery systems
9440843, Jul 03 2013 Mobile platform for dispensing fuel from any tank
9530290, Jan 18 2013 Fuel Guard Systems Corporation Apparatuses and methods for providing visual indication of dynamic process fuel quality delivery conditions with use of multiple colored indicator lights
9546959, Sep 16 2011 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and system for measurement of reservoir fluid properties
20020109080,
20040020271,
20050000853,
20050008532,
20060207430,
20080174323,
20090000602,
20090006026,
20090045925,
20090114676,
20090173698,
20096000602,
20100235107,
20100276424,
20100295565,
20110193027,
20110259088,
20120009588,
20120206253,
20130256161,
20130320214,
20130341333,
20140053943,
20190062142,
CA1185693,
CA2815917,
CN2665230,
EP718216,
EP2567944,
FR2908760,
GB2129329,
JP2005076070,
JP2010116842,
WO40943,
WO2008059288,
WO2012172286,
WO9832693,
WO9945272,
////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Aug 07 2013SABO, LORRAINE VANDER WIELENFRANKLIN FUELING SYSTEMS, INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0478010540 pdf
Aug 07 2013NELSON, WILLIAMFRANKLIN FUELING SYSTEMS, INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0478010540 pdf
Dec 13 2016FRANKLIN FUELING SYSTEMS, INC FRANKLIN FUELING SYSTEMS, LLCCHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0479480755 pdf
Aug 30 2018Franklin Fueling Systems, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Aug 30 2018BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code).
Feb 14 2024M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Sep 15 20234 years fee payment window open
Mar 15 20246 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 15 2024patent expiry (for year 4)
Sep 15 20262 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Sep 15 20278 years fee payment window open
Mar 15 20286 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 15 2028patent expiry (for year 8)
Sep 15 20302 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Sep 15 203112 years fee payment window open
Mar 15 20326 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 15 2032patent expiry (for year 12)
Sep 15 20342 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)