To provide a rolling bearing in which a favorable antirust performance can be obtained while reducing an amount of antirust oil than before, after removing chloride ions and sulfate ions from the entire surface of the bearing, antirust oil is provided to adhere thereto at an average film thickness of 4.5 μm to 10 μm, and the entire bearing is covered with a volatile corrosion inhibitor film such that a space between the volatile corrosion inhibitor film and the bearing is kept in a pressure-reduced condition.
|
0. 1. A rolling bearing comprising an inner ring, an outer ring, and a plurality of rolling elements retained between the inner ring and the outer ring by a retainer in a rollable manner,
wherein antirust oil is provided to adhere, at an average film thickness of 4.5 μm to 10 μm, to an entire surface of the bearing from which chloride ions and sulfate ions are removed, the entire bearing is covered with a volatile corrosion inhibitor film, and a space between the volatile corrosion inhibitor film and the bearing is kept in a pressure-reduced condition.
0. 2. The rolling bearing according to
3. The rolling bearing according to
wherein antirust oil is provided to adhere, at an average film thickness of 4.5 μm to 10 μm, to an entire surface of the bearing from which chloride ions and sulfate ions are removed, the entire bearing is covered with a volatile corrosion inhibitor film, and a space between the volatile corrosion inhibitor film and the bearing is kept in a pressure-reduced condition,
wherein the entire bearing is covered with the volatile corrosion inhibitor film and the space between the volatile corrosion inhibitor film and the bearing is kept in the pressure-reduced condition, in a state in which a bearing interior space defined by the inner ring, the outer ring, and the rolling elements is charged with grease.
0. 4. A method of packaging a rolling bearing after assembling the rolling bearing from bearing components, the method comprising:
after removing chloride ions and sulfate ions from an entire surface of the bearing, providing antirust oil to adhere thereto at an average film thickness of 4.5 μm to 10 μm, and covering the entire bearing with a volatile corrosion inhibitor film such that a space between the volatile corrosion inhibitor film and the bearing is kept in a pressure-reduced condition.
0. 5. The method of packaging the rolling bearing according to
6. The method of packaging the rolling bearing according to
after removing chloride ions and sulfate ions from an entire surface of the bearing, providing antirust oil to adhere thereto at an average film thickness of 4.5 μm to 10 μm, and covering the entire bearing with a volatile corrosion inhibitor film such that a space between the volatile corrosion inhibitor film and the bearing is kept in a pressure-reduced condition,
wherein after the adhesion of the antitrust oil, a bearing interior space defined by an inner ring, an outer ring and rolling elements is charged with grease, and the entire bearing is covered with the volatile corrosion inhibitor film such that the space between the volatile corrosion inhibitor film and the bearing is kept in the pressure-reduced condition.
|
Because the adhered chloride ions effect rusting of the rolling bearing,
Then, each test sample was left in a high temperature and high humidity environment of 50° C.-90% RH and periods of time until rust was occurred were compared. In the environment of 50° C.-90% RH, an effect of accelerating rusting by approximately 30 times is obtained as compared when samples were left at 20° C.-70% RH, which are the average temperature and humidity in Japan, and the equivalent numbers of years are shown in the figure. The results are shown in
The test samples fabricated in Test example 1 were opened and then a bearing interior space defined by an inner ring, an outer ring and balls was charged with grease (MTE produced by NSK Ltd.) of 1.1 g (15% of the bearing interior space volume), thereby fabricating test bearings. Then, after rotating the bearings for 24 hours at conditions as described below, using a tester as shown in
Pre-pressure upon mounting: 120N
Number of revolutions: 10000 min−1 (dm·n=54×104)
Operation position: Vertical
Driving method: Belt driving
Cooling of an outer cylinder: No
The results are shown in
Test bearings prepared by cleaning deep groove ball bearings of a bearing number 6202 with a water substitution type cleaning agent, providing antirust oil to adhere at an average film thickness of 10 μm and then charging with grease (MTE or MTS produced by NSK Ltd., or ISOFLEX NBU 15 produced by NOK KLÜBER Co., Ltd.), and comparative test bearings prepared by cleaning and degreasing, and charging with the grease without providing the antirust oil to adhere, were fabricated, 10 units for each test bearing, 60 units in total.
Also, after each test bearing was placed in a constant temperature bath and then a heating cycle in which the temperature is changed from “0° C.→30° C.→60° C.” every few hours, was repeated 7 times, a noise count measurement was performed one time, and such a measurement was performed 4 times in total. Noise counts before and after heating cycles of bearings were measured using a noise tester mounted in a known anderon device (acoustic measurement device).
The results are shown in
Test samples, in which the adhered amount of antirust oil in Test example 1 were adjusted to an average film thickness of 10 μm, were opened and then were charged with grease (MTE produced by NSK Ltd.) of 1.1 g (15% of the bearing interior space volume), thereby fabricating test bearings. Also, for comparison, comparative test bearings, which were charged with grease without adhering antirust oil after cleaning and degreasing, were fabricated. Then, each test bearing was rotated at conditions as described below, using the test apparatus used in Test example 2, and a temperature of the outer ring thereof at that time was measured.
Pre-pressure upon mounting: 120N
Number of revolutions: 12000 min−(dm·n=65×104)
Operation position: Vertical
Driving method: Belt drive
Cooling of outer cylinder: No
The results are shown in
(Verification of Residual Chloride Ion Amount)
After rolling bearings were fabricated by typical grinding process and all surfaces thereof were ground, chloride ions adhered thereon were removed to become below a detection limit of an analyzer.
After such pretreatment, chloride ions were newly adhered by treatments shown in Table 1, and then an amount of chloride ions was measured. For the measurement, after rolling bearings were immersed in a bath, in which a predetermined amount of ultrapure water was filled, during 2.5 hours at a temperature of 80° C. so that chloride ions were dissolved, a liquid was collected from the bath and then an amount of chloride ions therein were measured by a ion chromatography analyzer, DX-120, and a separation column, IonPacAS12A (4 mm), which are produced by Dionex K.K. The measurement method was performed at conditions identical to those of Explanation FIG. 6 of JIS K0127. Qualification was performed for chloride ions, thereby calculating an amount per unit area. The results are shown in Table 1.
For rolling bearings, on which the same treatment was performed, a rusting acceleration test was performed. In the rusting acceleration test, after the antirust oil was applied to the rolling bearings at an average film thickness of 4.5 μm and the rolling bearings are left for thirty days in a high temperature and high humidity environment of 50° C., 90% RH, whether or not the surfaces of rolling bearings were rusted was verified. The results are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1
Bearing surface
Amount of
Samples
treatment method
chloride ions
Rusting
1
Applying chloride ions by hand
13
ng/mm2
Yes
2
Cleaning Sample 1 to remove
5
ng/mm2
No
chloride ions
3
Applying artificial fingerprint
25
ng/mm2
Yes
liquid defined by JIS K 2246
4
Cleaning Sample 3 to remove
10
ng/mm2
No
chloride ions
As shown in Table 1, rusting can be prevented when an amount of chloride ions is 5 ng/mm2 to 10 ng/mm2.
In addition, assuming that an amount of chloride ions contained in a grinding water is 0.1 mg/L, which is a minimum defined in the Waterworks Law, it is believed that rolling bearings, which are typically ground and from which chloride ions does not removed, have chloride ions of few tens to few hundreds ng/mm2 adhered thereon, but when chloride ions are not removed, rusting cannot be prevented if the antirust oil has a thin film thickness of less than 4.5 μm.
From this test, it can be found that, when an amount of chloride ions, which have been adhered on rolling bearings after removing chloride ions therefrom, is set to 0.2 ng/mm2 to 10 ng/mm2, a favorable antirust performance can be obtained by setting a film thickness of the antirust oil to 4.5 μm or more (4.5 μm to 10 μm) as defined in the prevent invention.
Although the present invention has been described with referenced to the detailed and specific embodiments, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous changes and modifications can be made without departing the scope and spirit of the present invention.This application is based on Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-115810 filed on May 31, 2013, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention is suitable for storing and transporting machine tool bearings (in particular, machine tool spindle bearings).
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4311738, | May 27 1980 | Dow Corning Corporation | Method for rendering non-ferrous metals corrosion resistant |
4464275, | Mar 07 1980 | Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. | Rust preventive oil for a low frictional torque tapered roller bearing |
7140491, | Oct 15 2003 | TG Tools United Company | Packaging for grouped similar items, including elongated items such as drill bits and the like |
7235142, | Jan 04 2002 | University of Dayton | Non-toxic corrosion-protection rinses and seals based on cobalt |
20050178500, | |||
20060065285, | |||
20080139420, | |||
CN1853800, | |||
EP1666634, | |||
JP2003239090, | |||
JP2004167602, | |||
JP2005221071, | |||
JP2005350142, | |||
JP2006200658, | |||
JP2006322604, | |||
JP200695472, | |||
JP2007191203, | |||
JP200825738, | |||
JP2010258641, | |||
JP9286468, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jun 17 2019 | NSK Ltd. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 17 2019 | BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code). |
Dec 13 2023 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 01 2023 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 01 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 01 2024 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 01 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 01 2027 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 01 2028 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 01 2028 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 01 2030 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 01 2031 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 01 2032 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 01 2032 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 01 2034 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |