A shaving razor having a handle and a shaving head with an exposed reciprocating blade. A power source is disposed within the handle with an actuator that causes at least one blade of a multi-blade razor head to reciprocate within a zone of motion. Other embodiments are also described and claimed.
|
1. A shaving razor comprising:
a handle;
a power source residing within the handle;
a shaving head containing at least two razor blade assemblies, each of the blade assemblies include blades which at least one blade each having a cutting edge, wherein the cutting edges of the blade assemblies reside in a single cutting plane, at least a first of the blade assemblies is moveably coupled within the shaving head so that the first blade assembly can be driven to translate laterally within a zone of motion; and
an actuator coupled to the power source, the actuator to apply a force that drives the first blade assembly to reciprocate within the zone of motion to translate relative to an adjacent one of the blade assemblies.
0. 13. A shaving razor comprising:
a handle;
a shaving head containing at least two razor blade assemblies, each of the blade assemblies include at least one blade, each of a first blade assembly and a second blade assembly of the at least two blade assemblies are moveably coupled within the shaving head so that the first blade assembly can be driven to translate laterally within a first zone of motion and the second blade assembly can be driven to translate in a second zone of motion; and
one or more actuators coupled to, in use, receive power from a power source, the actuators to apply a force that drives the first blade assembly to reciprocate within the first zone of motion and the second blade assembly to reciprocate within the second zone of motion, wherein the translation of the first blade assembly is in an opposite direction relative to the translation of the second blade assembly, and
wherein a first blade in the first blade assembly and a second blade in the second blade assembly are ones of the at least one blade and each have a single substantially straight cutting edge.
2. The shaving razor of
one of an electric motor, a piezo electric motor or a servo.
3. The shaving razor of
4. The shaving razor of
5. The shaving razor of
7. The shaving razor of
a magnetic mass coupled to the first blade assembly and driven by the magnetic actuator.
8. The shaving razor of
9. The shaving razor of
10. The shaving razor of
11. The shaving razor of
0. 12. The shaving razor of claim 1 wherein a second of the blade assemblies is moveably coupled within the shaving head so that the second blade assembly can be driven to translate laterally within a second zone of motion.
0. 14. The shaving razor of claim 13 wherein each of the zones of motion are defined to be in a range of 0.1 mm to 0.5 mm relative to each other.
0. 15. The shaving razor of claim 13 wherein the first and second blade assemblies are adjacent to each other within the shaving head.
|
Field
Embodiments of the invention relate to a shaving razor. More particularly, embodiments of the invention relate to a shaving razor having at least one exposed reciprocating blade.
Background
There are two main classes of shaving razors that dominate the market. There are electric razors, which have one or more cutting implements behind a screen or other protective barrier, where the cutting elements are powered to, for example, spin such that hair penetrating the screen or barrier is cut. The advantage of these types of razors is after the initial purchase, a large number of shaves are possible without replacing the device or parts thereof. Unfortunately, electric razors are typically somewhat bulky, making it difficult to get into tight spaces, for example, around a user's nose. Additionally, even in open spaces such as a user's cheek, the closeness of the shave generally does not match that which is possible with exposed-blade razors. This lack of closeness is due at least impart to the dimension of the barrier. Even relatively thin micro-screens have a thickness that dictates the maximum closeness of the shave. That is, the shave can be no closer than the thickness of the screen.
The second class of razors in common use today is exposed-blade razors, which have one or more blades arranged in a cartridge. A user pulls the cartridge across the area to be shaved, and the blades provide a shave that is generally closer than possible with an electric razor, owing to the fact that the blades are in direct contact with the user's skin and the dimension of the protective shield of the electric razors need not be accommodated. Commonly, three, four, or even five blades are aligned to cut in the same shaving direction. Even where multiple blades are present, the leading blade performs the most of the cutting. As used herein, “leading” when modifying blade refers to the first blade to come in contact with the hair in the direction of shaving. As a result, the leading blade dulls more quickly than the other blades. Often, the dullness of the leading blade requires replacement of the cartridge while the remaining blades are perfectly serviceable.
Some razor manufacturers have come up with “power” models of their exposed blade razors. These razors include a battery in the handle and a motor with an eccentric mass such that when powered, the entire razor vibrates. In these models, the blades do not actually move; rather, the entire device vibrates. This feature has been heavily advertised, but market research reflects that it fails to provide any real benefit to the user, and the majority of users do not replace the battery once it goes dead. Studies have not revealed that power models have longer cartridge life or improved cutting efficacy over the unpowered models. Rather, these “power” exposed blade razors appear to be little more than a marketing gimmick
Embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example and not by way of limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements. It should be noted that different references to “an” or “one” embodiment in this disclosure are not necessarily to the same embodiment, and such references mean at least one.
Cartridges 108 are coupled to cross-members 106 in a fixed manner. Cartridge 110 is coupled to allow it to reciprocate, as explained below in more detail with reference to
In this embodiment, since cartridge 110 contains the leading blade and is therefore responsible for a disproportionate amount of the cutting effort, by reciprocating this blade, the hair is cut more efficiently with reduced dulling of the blade. This has been found to significantly increase the useful life of shaving assembly 100. More specifically, the reciprocation results in a sawing effect when the blade encounters a hair. By analogy, a knife must be much sharper to cut with pressure alone than with a sawing motion. Similarly, here, the reciprocation allows the blade to cut more efficiently. It reduces the dulling effect on cutting and allows for more effective cutting with a duller blade than possible with conventional techniques. The more effective cutting reduces the pulling and tugging. Cartridges employing this reciprocating technique have been found to last up to a year without replacement.
Testing has revealed that reciprocation of less than 0.1 mm is not effective in increasing blade life or increasing the efficacy in cutting the hair to be shaved. Reciprocation greater than 0.5 mm significantly increases the risk of nicks and cuts during use. As a result the range r is chosen to be in the range of 0.1-0.5.mm and approximately 0.2 mm has be found to be effective without increased cut risk. While in some embodiments the arm 116 and 118 may limit the reciprocation of the blade, the slots 330 provide hard stops and ensure the blade will not move beyond that limit. This provides a safety margin in the event that any other restriction on the blade movement is compromised.
As noted above, it is desirable to limit the relative motion between cartridges 410 and 408 to less than 0.5 mm. It has been found that relative motion in excess of 0.5 mm increases the risk of nicks and cuts for the user. It has also been found that a range of motion less than 0.1 mm fails to provide the desired utility. Thus, the range of motion between 0.1 and 0.5 mm is desirable (the reduced upper bound provides an additional safety margin), and 0.2 mm has been found satisfactory. As shown in
While this embodiment uses a mechanical actuator, embodiments with a magnetic actuator moving more than one blade are also within the scope and contemplation of the invention. For example, the embodiment of
In the foregoing specification, the embodiments of the invention have been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes can be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11254023, | May 07 2018 | Linkage for reciprocating razor | |
11897153, | May 07 2018 | Reciprocating razor having blades linked to facilitate oppositely directed movement |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10357891, | Mar 20 2014 | Rolling Razor, Inc | Shaving razor interconnection mechanism and method of making simplified interconnection |
10414057, | Dec 18 2013 | Bic-Violex SA | Shaving blade cartridge |
10500746, | May 07 2018 | Reciprocating razor with living hinge interconnections | |
3413718, | |||
3631595, | |||
4174569, | Feb 25 1977 | Electric razor | |
4744144, | Apr 02 1986 | WELLINGTON INVESTMENTS, INC , A CORP OF TX | Oscillating razor |
5152064, | Sep 09 1991 | Shaving method and apparatus | |
5307564, | Dec 01 1992 | Safety razor | |
5504997, | Oct 18 1994 | Blade holder assembly for an electric razor | |
5732470, | Feb 08 1996 | GOOD MARKETING, INC | Oscillating razor |
5794342, | Aug 09 1996 | Oscillating blade razor | |
6158126, | Feb 18 1998 | Face International Corp.; Face International Corporation | Piezoelectrically actuated shaver |
6161288, | Feb 22 1993 | BEIR HOWLETT, P C | Four blade bi-directional razor structure with flexible guard system |
6434828, | Feb 22 1993 | In-line razor device with twin pivoting heads | |
6442840, | Jan 20 1998 | Wheel Technology Ltd. | Electric razor with direct contact roller-mounted blades |
6502312, | Dec 21 1998 | Braun GmbH | Power driven hair clipper |
7086160, | Oct 21 2002 | Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC | Bidirectional shaving implement |
7797834, | Dec 02 2003 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V | Shaving device with a pivotable shaving head carrying an actively driven cutting member |
8479398, | Jul 22 2008 | Rolling Razor, Inc | Shaving assembly |
8595940, | Jul 22 2009 | Rolling Razor, Inc | Shaving assembly |
8707561, | May 31 2010 | Shaving device with a pad | |
8726517, | Jan 11 2010 | Specialife Industries Limited | Trimmer mechanism, hair trimmer, and hair trimmer attachment |
9144914, | Jun 30 2011 | Rolling Razor, Inc | Razor cartridge with reduced part count and expanded range of motion |
9457486, | Mar 13 2013 | Rolling Razor, Inc | Shaving cartridge with individual blade guards |
9630332, | Sep 29 2014 | WINNING TECHNOLOGIES LTD | Shaving razor with one or more reciprocating blades |
9821480, | Jun 30 2011 | Rolling Razor, Inc | Razor cartridge with reduced part count and expanded range of motion |
20050188540, | |||
20060064875, | |||
20080034592, | |||
20110131812, | |||
20120151772, | |||
20130160296, | |||
20140259677, | |||
20150266192, | |||
20160001454, | |||
CA2731538, | |||
CA2942900, | |||
D343922, | Oct 13 1992 | Disposable razor | |
D423143, | Aug 19 1999 | Dual head razor | |
GB184913, | |||
GB2462086, | |||
GB290796, | |||
KR20140053107, | |||
WO2010010517, | |||
WO2013003484, | |||
WO2015142526, | |||
WO2016053664, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Apr 22 2019 | Winning Technologies Ltd. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 22 2019 | BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code). |
Aug 20 2019 | SMAL: Entity status set to Small. |
Oct 25 2024 | M2552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 24 2024 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Feb 24 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 24 2025 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 24 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 24 2028 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Feb 24 2029 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 24 2029 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 24 2031 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 24 2032 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Feb 24 2033 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 24 2033 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 24 2035 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |