testing methods and apparatus for testing the health of steel tubes used in reformers and other tubes and pipes used in other high temperature applications. The method includes the steps of transmitting two sinusoidal electromagnetic signals, each having a different frequency f1 and f2, into the reformer tube, receiving a response signal, and analyzing the received response signal's intermodulation frequencies to determine the state of the steel reformer tube.
|
1. A method of testing an austenitic steel reformer tube comprising:
providing a sample austenitic steel reformer tube to be tested;
choosing one or more testing positions on said an austenitic steel reformer tube;
transmitting two sinusoidal electromagnetic signals, each having a different frequency f1 and f2, into a test position on the austenitic steel reformer tube;
receiving a response signal from said test position; and
analyzing said received response signal's fundamental and intermodulation frequencies to determine the state of the austenitic steel reformer tube at said test position;
wherein said step of receiving a response signal from said test position includes receiving an analog response signal on a receiver coil;
wherein said step of receiving a response signal from said test position further includes the step of converting said analog response signal to a digital response signal, using an analog to digital converter;
wherein said analog to digital converter has a sampling frequency fs; and
wherein said step of converting said analog response signal to a digital response signal, using an analog to digital converter includes combining a multiple of samples into a single representative sample, the number of samples which are combined into said single representative sample being designated the sample size Ss.
0. 2. The method of
0. 3. The method of
0. 4. The method of
0. 5. The method of
7. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
f1=N×F0; f2=P×F0; where N and P are integers with N not equal to P, and
N and P are chosen such that none of the intermodulation frequencies, f(Q,R)=Q×F1+R×F2 are equal to an integral multiple of f1 or f2 for small, non-zero, integer (positive or negative) values of Q and R.
11. The method of
12. The method of
13. The method of
providing a sample austenitic steel reformer tube to be tested;
choosing one or more testing positions on said an austenitic steel reformer tube;
transmitting two sinusoidal electromagnetic signals, each having a different frequency f1 and f2, into a test position on the austenitic steel reformer tube;
receiving a response signal from said test position; and
analyzing said received response signal's fundamental and intermodulation frequencies to determine the state of the austenitic steel reformer tube at said test position;
wherein said step of transmitting two sinusoidal electromagnetic signals comprises transmitting each of said signals from individual transmitter coils; and
wherein said transmitter coils have a larger diameter than the thickness of the sample tube to be tested.
14. The method of
15. The method of
16. The method of
17. The method of
18. The method of
19. The method of
20. The method of
providing a sample austenitic steel reformer tube to be tested;
choosing one or more testing positions on said an austenitic steel reformer tube;
transmitting two sinusoidal electromagnetic signals, each having a different frequency f1 and f2, into a test position on the austenitic steel reformer tube;
receiving a response signal from said test position; and
analyzing said received response signal's fundamental and intermodulation frequencies to determine the state of the austenitic steel reformer tube at said test position;
wherein said step of analyzing said received response signal's fundamental and intermodulation frequencies comprises analyzing the first order fundamental and the third order intermodulation frequencies of said received response signal;
wherein said step of analyzing the third order intermodulation frequencies comprises converting the amplitude of said third order intermodulation frequencies into decibels dB relative to the amplitude of said fundamental;
wherein the strength of said third order intermodulation frequencies which have been converted into decibels dB is compared to the same measurement of brand new and end of service life austenitic steel reformer tubes, said comparison providing a qualitative measure of the health of said austenitic steel reformer tube; and
including the further step of estimating the remaining service life of said austenitic steel reformer tube as a fraction of the present service life of said austenitic steel reformer tube by the following formulas:
fractional life remaining Lr=|Se−Sn|/|Se−S0|; and estimated lifetime remaining Tr=(Lr/(1−Lr))×Tn where: Lr is the estimated percentage of life remaining;
Se is the third order intermodulation frequencies signal strength converted into decibels dB of an austenitic steel reformer tube at the end of service life;
Sn is the third order intermodulation frequencies signal strength converted into decibels dB of the test sample now;
S0 is either the third order intermodulation frequencies signal strength when there is no tube present under the probe, or the third order intermodulation frequencies signal strength of a new tube that has been heated to operating temperature for a few hours, whichever is higher;
Tr is the estimated service lifetime remaining for the test sample; and
Tn is the present service life of the test sample.
|
estimated lifetime remaining Tr=(Lr/(1−Lr))×Tn where:
Lr is the estimated percentage of life remaining;
Se is the third order intermodulation frequencies signal strength converted into decibels dB of an austenitic steel reformer tube at the end of service life;
Sn is the third order intermodulation frequencies signal strength converted into decibels dB of the test sample now;
S0 is either the third order intermodulation frequencies signal strength when there is no tube present under the probe, or the third order intermodulation frequencies signal strength of a new tube that has been heated to operating temperature for a few hours, whichever is higher;
Tr is the estimated service lifetime remaining for the test sample; and
Tn is the present service life of the test sample.
The present invention relates to measurement/testing methods and apparatus for testing the health of steel tubes used in reformers and other tubes and pipes used in other high temperature applications. The inventors use an electromagnetic intermodulation technique to measure ferromagnetism generated in the paramagnetic alloy during service. The ferromagnetic signal is initially small, but increases with length of service and severity of the thermal environment. Conventional eddy current NDT methods are not able to detect this very low level of deterioration. It is believed that the ferromagnetism, in the initial stage of deterioration, develops in the sub-scale Cr-depleted zones of the tube wall, around the carbides and along the grain boundaries, thus creating the discrete network of ferromagnetic channels throughout the paramagnetic material.
In order to apply signal intermodulation techniques through a conductive media (i.e. the steel reformer tubes) it is necessary to use extra low frequency signals in order to penetrate quickly throughout the substrate. The field configuration must be chosen to ignore surface effects and to provide reasonably uniform sensitivity throughout the substrate. Signal processing techniques are used to achieve enough sensitivity. In addition, because deterioration and failure of these materials is a local phenomenon, it is necessary to be able to scan the entire substrate, preferably as quickly as possible.
Generically the method consists of using the probe of the present invention to transmit a pair of electromagnetic signals at different frequencies into the material to be tested. The probe then records the response of the material to the pair of signals, and this response is used to determine the physical state of the material.
To more fully understand the present inventions, the probe and the testing criterion/technique will be described. Thereafter, the specifics of use of the probe and technique to determine the health and projected useful life expectancy of steel tubes that have been subjected to high temperature environments will be described.
The Probe
While the above description of the probe includes two transmitter coils 3 and two sinusoidal current generators 2, this is not the only configuration that will work to achieve the desired measurements. For instance, a single transmitter coil 3 and single generator 2 can be used to produce the two signals. This the least expensive probe to build. The generator 2 is much more expensive since it must have a very low IMD (inter modulation distortion) value. In another configuration, the probe can have a single coil 3 and two generators 2. This embodiment is probably more expensive to build than the single coil/generator embodiment since there are two generators 2, and the final amplifier(s) must able to combine the signals.
In yet another embodiment, the probe may have two coils 3 and a single generator 2. This embodiment is more expensive than the single coil/generator, but the two coils 3 add flexibility. If the two coils 3 are used in “push-pull” mode, the final amplifier would be easier to build. The embodiment described above which includes two coils 3 and two generators 2, is the only high sensitivity configuration that could be built without low IMD components. In a variant on this embodiment, the coils carry apposing DC current components that can cancel or enhance stray magnetic fields.
Finally, there is an embodiment that includes four coils 3 and two generators 2. The coil would be very difficult to build, but the two generators and amplifiers are simpler, since they can both operate in push pull mode. If a second probe is used, the coils in the two probes are connected in series, with the sense of the second signal reversed in the second probe. This cancels out the mutual inductance effect, improving the transmitted signals considerably. This provides the highest possible sensitivity with available technology.
General Use of the Probe
Regardless of the specific configuration of the probe, two sinusoidal signals are created and transmitted into a sample to be tested. The reason for using two signals is now discussed. Voltages are induced in the receiver coil by the transmitted signal(s), and any small changes induced by the sample being tested will be indistinguishable, compared to the power of the transmitted signal. Thus, the power at some other frequency, not present in the transmitted signal, needs to be measured. The test sample will also likely create harmonics of the transmitted signal (i.e. where x is the frequency of transmitted signal, the harmonics would be 2x, 3x, 4x, etc) which will be picked up by the receiver coil. Thus, reading the harmonic signal created by the sample may provide useful information on the sample being tested. Unfortunately, the signal generators will also likely produce harmonics of the transmitted signal, and, again, the signal produced by the sample will likely be small (i.e. noise) compared to the transmitted harmonics. Finally, when two signals are transmitted into the sample, any nonlinear electrical or magnetic properties in the sample being tested will produce intermodulation products of the two transmitted signals, which are also picked up by the receiver coil. Intermodulation product frequencies are additive and subtractive combinations of two or more frequencies. For instance for two frequencies, F1 and F2, some intermodulation product frequencies are F1+F2; F1−F2; 2F1+F2; 2F1−F2; 2F1+2F2; etc.
For real world use, the transmitter frequencies, F1 and F2, the A/D converter sampling frequency Fs, and the sample size Ss are chosen to meet the following requirements. The sample size Ss is a is an integral power of two (such as, for example, 4096, or 8192, or 16384). Fs is the sampling frequency of the A/D converter in samples/second. Base frequency will be defined as F0=Fs/Ss. F1=N×F0; F2=P×F0; where N and P are integers with N not equal to P. Also, N and P are chosen such that none of the intermodulation frequencies F(Q,R)=Q×F1+R×F2 are equal to an integral multiple of F1 or F2 for small, non-zero, integer (positive or negative) values of Q and R.
Any nonlinear electrical or magnetic properties in the sample will produce intermodulation products at frequencies F(Q,R). The transmitter apparatus does not produce these frequencies F(Q,R), so the amplitudes of the F(Q,R) components are an absolute measurement of the properties of the nonlinear material. Given that:
F(Q,R)=(Q×N+R×P)×F0=M×F0
where M is an integer, the amplitudes of the F(Q,R) components are easily obtained using a Fast Fourier Transform or a Finite Impulse Response filter on the set of sample measurements taken by the ND converter.
The present inventors have found the probe and testing method of the present invention is very useful in determining the state of deterioration of austenitic alloy reformer tubes used in hydrogen reformers. It was noted that deterioration of these austenitic alloys is associated with the appearance of ferromagnetic properties and from this, the inventors determined that it might be possible to predict remaining service life if the amount of deterioration could be measured.
Measurement
The probe and method described is used to measure the health of creep resistant austenitic alloys of the type used in the reformer tubes of hydrogen reformers. It is believed that the probe measures the total magnetic moment and density of certain ferromagnetic micro-zones which can be correlated with the development and deterioration of creep resistance in these alloys. As disclosed above, the method applies two sinusoidal magnetizing fields at slightly different frequencies to the alloy. The magnetic flux resulting from these magnetizing fields as well as the magnetic flux due to induced magnetic moments within the alloy is sampled, processed, and analyzed. Measurements are taken at spaced intervals along the length and circumference of the tubes. This allows for 2d and 3d mapping of the health of the tube.
Analysis
From the total magnetic flux that is received by the receiver coil at each individual testing location, the fundamental and intermodulation frequency signals thereof are isolated. These intermodulation frequency signals provide useful information to analyze the health of the austenitic alloy in the tubes at the specific testing positions. Of particular interest is the third order intermodulation frequencies. The power levels at the intermodulation frequencies are converted into decibels (dB) relative to the fundamental frequency power and plotted in 2D or 3D graphs against the position along the length and/or circumference of the tube. In the same manner as percentages, decibels, in this case 20×LOG(Vmeasured/Vreference), must always be the ratio of two numbers. Comparison with the fundamental magnitude is most useful because this ratio is independent of receiver characteristics, and not overly sensitive to transmitter characteristics.
In contrast to
Thus the analysis of the intermodulation response signal indicates that the lower half of the 5 year old tube is aging evenly, while the top half is being subjected to a varying furnace environment that may include a “hot spot”, which is prematurely aging the uppermost portion of the tube. This premature aging may cause the tube to fail in that area (i.e. cause a hydrogen leak or even break off and fall) which could damage other tubes in its vicinity. Thus, knowledge of the condition of the tube along its entire length allows operators to replace individual tubes as necessary, and also, importantly, allows operators to continue using older tube which have not deteriorated to the point of needing replacement.
To determine the expected remaining service life of a tube, the measurements of the intermodulation response signal from multiple tubes of different ages were taken (i.e. new tubes, tubes that have been in service in the reformer for varying amounts of time and failed tubes).
The remaining service life of the reformer tube as a fraction of the present service life and the actual remaining service life can be estimated by the following formulas:
% life remaining Lr=|Se−Sn|/|Se−S0|; and
estimated lifetime remaining Tr=(Lr/(1−Lr))×Tn
Where Lr is the estimated fraction of life remaining; Se is the third order intermodulation frequencies signal strength converted into decibels dB of an austenitic steel reformer tube at the end of service life; Sn is the third order intermodulation frequencies signal strength converted into decibels dB of the test sample now; S0 is either the third order intermodulation frequencies signal strength when there is no tube present under the probe, or the third order intermodulation frequencies signal strength of a new tube that has been heated to operating temperature for a few hours, whichever is higher; Tr is the estimated service lifetime remaining for the test sample; and Tn is the present service life of the test sample.
The best value for S0 is the open air calibration point for the probe used to test the tubes, that is, the third order signal strength when there is no tube present. This value generally ranges from −90 to −109 dBc for the probe and amplifier combinations tested so far. There is reason to believe that the real value for S0 is −120 to −130 dBc, but it is not possible to make meaningful measurements below the open air calibration point of the testing device. The next best value would be taken from a tube that has been brought up to operating temperature for a few hours. This is because new, as cast, tubes can contain an unstable form of delta ferrite sometimes left over from the casting process. This residual disappears upon heating. The impact of this residual on overall tube life is unknown, but it can't be used for the equations presented above. There have been cases where there is no initial IMD for the as cast tube, but this is the exception, not the rule.
As an example let us suppose that the present third order intermodulation frequencies signal strength converted into decibels dB of the tube to be tested is −50 dB, that of a new tube of the same type (alloy composition, processing, etc) as that to be tested is −100 dB, and that of a tube at the end of its service life is −40 db. The fractional remaining service life Lr would be |−40−(−50)|/|−40−(−100)|= 10/60=⅙. Let us further assume that the present service life of the test sample Tn is 85 months. Then the estimated service lifetime remaining for the test sample Tr=(⅙/(1−⅙))×85 months=17 months.
It should be noted that the present inventors have learned that the present testing method and equations do not work for tubes with profound damage. In tubes this damaged, the IMD value begins to drop, while the magnitude of the FF or tubes with profound damage, the IMD value begins to drop, while the magnitude of the F2 component at the receiver increases. The effect becomes noticeable at an IMD value of −40 dBc, and by the time F2 reaches half of its maximum value the IMD value reaches −35 dBc. Beyond that point IMD begins to fall as F2 continues to a maximum. In such a case a synthetic IMD value can be projected from this that extends above −35 dBc and by the time the synthetic IMD value reaches 0 the tube is cracked all the way through.
Deployment/Use of the Probe Via a Crawler
One or more probes may be attached to a transportation device which will allow the probes to traverse the length and width or circumference of the sample to be tested. The transportation device may take the form of a crawler that has the ability to traverse horizontal samples or to climb up and down a vertical sample. Also, depending on the number of probes on the crawler, the crawler may have the ability to turn circumferentially around the sample to reposition the probe to different points on the circumference of the sample. Preferably the crawler includes means for measuring the position of the probe with respect to the dimensions of the sample so that the measured intermodulation frequency signals can be correlated with specific locations on the sample.
The crawler may also carry the supporting electronics for the probe, such as signal generators, A/D and D/A converters, etc. The received intermodulation frequency signals may be recorded onboard the crawler, such as in a dedicated storage medium, for later retrieval. Alternatively, the signals may be transmitted to a separate storage device (wired or wireless transfer). The intermodulation frequency signal processing electronics may be onboard, but preferably are not.
Metallurgical Examination
While not wishing to be bound by theory, the inventors present the following metallurgical explanation behind the measurements/results produced when applying the method and probe of the present invention.
The present method and probe use induced magnetization to detect deterioration in iron nickel chromium carbon alloy tubes. The initial material is not ferromagnetic but loss of chromium and an increase in carbides will change the microstructure and produce ferromagnetic regions with high permeability. It is known that iron nickel chromium alloys get their creep resistance from carbides that precipitate in the as cast matrix, and that additional carbides precipitate and enlarge with time and temperature. It has been discovered that as chromium and iron migrate into these carbides a zone will form near or surrounding the carbides that is enhanced in nickel and depleted in chromium. The resulting ferromagnetic structures are easily driven into saturation by weak magnetizing fields. As creep sets in, chromium is also lost to cracks that form within the alloy, leaving nickel and iron to form thin ferromagnetic sheets within the matrix near the cracks. Once again, these structures are easily driven into saturation by the weak magnetizing field of the probe of the instant invention. These induced magnetic moments contain harmonics and intermodulation products of the original two sinusoidal magnetizing fields that can be related to the size and density of the structures.
It should be noted that the magnetic regions are confined to narrow regions (below the surface scale) around the carbides, and to the grain boundaries for this sample. However, in a hotter area of the furnace, or as the length of time the tube has been in service increases, the regions (below the surface scale) around the carbides, and the grain boundaries grow.
Finally,
The foregoing is provided for purposes of explaining and disclosing preferred embodiments of the present invention. Modifications and adaptations to the described embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. These changes and others may be made without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention in the following claims.
Masleid, Michael A., Niemczura, Zofia E., Tsvik, George B.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10060882, | Dec 10 2012 | ArcelorMittal | Method and apparatus for determining the health and remaining service life of austenitic steel reformer tubes and the like |
4084136, | Oct 21 1976 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Eddy current nondestructive testing device for measuring variable characteristics of a sample utilizing Walsh functions |
5047717, | Dec 07 1988 | Siemens Aktiengesellachaft | Method and apparatus for measuring internal mechanical stress of a ferromagnetic body by determining the third harmonic of the induction |
5180969, | Feb 04 1992 | Southwest Research Institute | Detection of reinforcing steel corrosion in concrete structures using non-linear harmonic and intermodulation wave generation |
5311127, | Mar 26 1990 | Vallourec Industries | Method and apparatus for inspecting metal tubes employing magnetically induced eddy currents |
5616850, | Dec 29 1995 | Gas Research Institute | Emissions measuring system and method |
6201391, | Oct 07 1998 | Southwest Research Institute | Nonlinear harmonics method and system for measuring degradation in protective coatings |
6211671, | Jul 22 1994 | S AQUA SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC | Interference-cancellation system for electromagnetic receivers |
6239593, | Sep 21 1998 | Southwest Research Institute | Method and system for detecting and characterizing mechanical damage in pipelines using nonlinear harmonics techniques |
6275050, | Nov 29 1999 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air | Apparatus and method to detect corrosion in metal junctions |
6344739, | Feb 12 1999 | Zetec, Inc | Eddy current probe with multi-use coils and compact configuration |
6597993, | Dec 14 1998 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | High resolution array induction tool |
6917176, | Mar 07 2001 | Carnegie Mellon University | Gas main robotic inspection system |
6995558, | Mar 29 2002 | NATIVIS, INC | System and method for characterizing a sample by low-frequency spectra |
7002340, | Mar 25 2003 | THE PRESSURE PIPE INSPECTION COMPANY LTD | Method for inspecting prestressed concrete pressure pipes based on remote field eddy current/transformer coupling and use of non-coaxial coils |
7046356, | Nov 15 2000 | Quest Trutec, LP; QUEST INTEGRATED, INC | Method for processing in situ inspection reformer tube data |
7449881, | Jul 22 2002 | Borealis Technology Oy | Method and apparatus for determining the thickness of a chromium depleted zone of a surface region of a steel member |
8050874, | Jun 14 2004 | PAPADIMITRIOU, WANDA; THE JASON PAPADIMITRIOU IRREVOCABLE TRUST; THE NICHOLAS PAPADIMITRIOU IRREVOCABLE TRUST; STYLWAN IP HOLDING, LLC | Autonomous remaining useful life estimation |
8193804, | Nov 16 2005 | MAGQU CO , LTD | Device for measuring AC magnetization of materials |
8274279, | Oct 17 2006 | ATHENA INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Inspection apparatus and method |
8378676, | Jun 05 2009 | NUOVO PIGNONE S P A | System and method for detecting corrosion pitting in gas turbines |
8536860, | Jan 27 2007 | SONOMATIC LIMITED | Method and apparatus for non-destructive testing |
8928315, | Mar 11 2009 | Sumitomo Chemical Company Limited | Eddy current flaw detection probe |
20010019264, | |||
20030100994, | |||
20040114793, | |||
20040183530, | |||
20060050092, | |||
20060119492, | |||
20080004839, | |||
20110163740, | |||
20120007596, | |||
20120089346, | |||
20120152007, | |||
20130060487, | |||
20150177191, | |||
20160195496, | |||
GB2088064, | |||
JP2003149212, | |||
JP2004279054, | |||
JP2004279055, | |||
JP2007206057, | |||
JP2010204101, | |||
JP526811, | |||
JP61201159, | |||
KR1020050026504, | |||
KR1020120031939, | |||
RU115073, | |||
RU2010141693, | |||
RU2397485, | |||
RU2494249, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 11 2018 | TSVIK, GEORGE B | ArcelorMittal | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 057154 | /0493 | |
Jan 31 2018 | MASLEID, MICHAEL A | ArcelorMittal | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 057154 | /0493 | |
Feb 05 2018 | NIEMCZURA, ZOFIA E | ArcelorMittal | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 057154 | /0493 | |
Mar 27 2018 | ArcelorMittal | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 27 2018 | BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code). |
Sep 20 2018 | PTGR: Petition Related to Maintenance Fees Granted. |
Jun 19 2024 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 14 2024 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 14 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 14 2025 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 14 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 14 2028 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 14 2029 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 14 2029 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 14 2031 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 14 2032 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 14 2033 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 14 2033 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 14 2035 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |