An apparatus for decoding frames of a compressed video data stream having at least one frame divided into partitions, includes a memory and a processor configured to execute instructions stored in the memory to read partition data information indicative of a partition location for at least one of the partitions, decode a first partition of the partitions that includes a first sequence of blocks, decode a second partition of the partitions that includes a second sequence of blocks identified from the partition data information using decoded information of the first partition.

Patent
   RE49727
Priority
Sep 11 2008
Filed
Mar 12 2021
Issued
Nov 14 2023
Expiry
Dec 05 2028
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
0
189
currently ok
0. 20. An apparatus for encoding frames of a video, including at least one frame divided into partitions, the apparatus comprising:
a memory; and
a processor configured to execute instructions stored in the memory to:
encode, into a compressed video data stream, a first partition of the partitions that includes a first sequence of blocks;
encode, into the compressed video data stream, at a partition location with respect to the compressed video data stream, a second partition of the partitions that includes a second sequence of blocks encoded using information of the first partition;
include, in the compressed video data stream, partition data information indicative of the partition location with respect to the compressed video data stream for at least one of the partitions; and
output or store the compressed video data stream.
0. 13. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon an encoded bitstream, including at least one frame divided into individually compressed partitions, wherein the encoded bitstream is configured for decoding by operations comprising:
reading, from the encoded bitstream, partition data information indicative of a partition location with respect to the encoded bitstream for at least one of the partitions;
decoding, from the encoded bitstream, a first partition of the partitions that includes a first sequence of blocks;
decoding, from the encoded bitstream, a second partition of the partitions that includes a second sequence of blocks identified based on the partition location indicated by the partition data information, using decoded information of the first partition; and
outputting or storing a decoded frame including the first sequence of blocks and the second sequence of blocks.
1. An apparatus for decoding frames of a compressed video data stream, including at least one frame divided into partitions, the apparatus comprising:
a memory; and
a processor configured to execute instructions stored in the memory to:
read, from the compressed video data stream, partition data information indicative of a partition location with respect to the compressed video data stream for at least one of the partitions;
decode, from the compressed video data stream, a first partition of the partitions that includes a first sequence of blocks; and
decode, from the compressed video data stream, a second partition of the partitions that includes a second sequence of blocks identified based on the partition location indicated by the partition data information, using decoded information of the first partition;
wherein the first partition and the second partition have each been individually compressed; and
output or store a decoded frame including the first sequence of blocks and the second sequence of blocks.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the decoding includes decoding lossless coded information.
0. 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to identify one row of blocks in the frame having a boundary between the first partition and the second partition.
0. 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first partition includes contiguous blocks in at least a portion of a first row and at least a portion of a first subsequent row.
0. 5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the second partition includes contiguous blocks in at least a portion of a second row and at least a portion of a second subsequent row.
0. 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first partition comprises blocks of two or more contiguous rows of blocks.
7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to decode the second sequence of blocks using context information contained in the first sequence of blocks.
0. 8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the processor is further configured to perform at least one of intra-frame prediction or inter-frame prediction on the second partition.
9. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the processor decodes the second partition with an offset of a specified number of blocks such that at least a portion of decoded context information of the first sequence of blocks is available as context data for decoding at least one block in the second partition.
10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the offset is determined based upon size of the context.
11. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the first sequence of blocks in the first partition and the second sequence of blocks in the second partition are derived from corresponding rows of blocks in two successive frames of the video data, and wherein the processor is further configured to:
decode at least one block in the second partition using information from a block previously decoded.
12. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the decoding includes context-based arithmetic coding.
0. 14. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 13, wherein the decoding includes decoding losslessly coded information.
0. 15. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 13, wherein the decoding includes decoding the second sequence of blocks using context information contained in the first sequence of blocks.
0. 16. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the decoding includes decoding the second partition with an offset of a specified number of blocks such that at least a portion of decoded context information of the first sequence of blocks is available as context data for decoding at least one block in the second partition.
0. 17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein the offset is determined based upon size of the context.
0. 18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the first sequence of blocks in the first partition and the second sequence of blocks in the second partition are derived from corresponding rows of blocks in two successive frames of the video data, and wherein the decoding includes:
decoding at least one block in the second partition using information from a block previously decoded.
0. 19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 13, wherein the decoding includes context-based arithmetic coding.
0. 21. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the processor is configured to execute the instructions to use context information from the first sequence of blocks to encode the second sequence of blocks.
0. 22. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the processor is configured to execute the instructions to encode the second partition with an offset of a specified number of blocks such that at least a portion of context information from the first sequence of blocks is available as context data for encoding at least one block in the second partition.
0. 23. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein the offset is determined based upon size of the context.
0. 24. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein the first sequence of blocks in the first partition and the second sequence of blocks in the second partition are derived from corresponding rows of blocks in two successive frames of the video data, and the processor is configured to execute the instructions to:
use information from a block previously decoded to encode at least one block in the second partition.
0. 25. The apparatus of claim 24, wherein to encode the processor is configured to execute the instructions to use context-based arithmetic coding.

This application is a continuation of U.S. nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 13/565,364, filed Aug. 2, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,357,223, which is a divisional of U.S. nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 12/329,248, filed Dec. 5, 2008, which claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/096,223, filed Sep. 11, 2008, which are incorporated herein in entirety by reference.

The present invention relates in general to video decoding using multiple processors.

An increasing number of applications today make use of digital video for various purposes including, for example, remote business meetings via video conferencing, high definition video entertainment, video advertisements, and sharing of user-generated videos. As technology is evolving, people have higher expectations for video quality and expect high resolution video with smooth playback at a high frame rate.

There can be many factors to consider when selecting a video coder for encoding, storing and transmitting digital video. Some applications may require excellent video quality where others may need to comply with various constraints including, for example, bandwidth or storage requirements. To permit higher quality transmission of video while limiting bandwidth consumption, a number of video compression schemes are noted including proprietary formats such as VPx (promulgated by On2 Technologies, Inc. of Clifton Park, N.Y., H.264 standard promulgated by ITU-T Video Coding Experts Group (VCEG) and the ISO/IEC Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG), including present and future versions thereof. H.264 is also known as MPEG-4 Part 10 or MPEG-4 AVC (formally, ISO/IEC 14496-10).

There are many types of video encoding schemes that allow video data to be compressed and recovered. The H.264 standard, for example, offers more efficient methods of video coding by incorporating entropy coding methods such as Context-based Adaptive Variable Length Coding (CAVLC) and Context-based Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding (CABAC). For video data that is encoded using CAVLC, some modem decompression systems have adopted the use of a multi-core processor or multiprocessors to increase overall video decoding speed.

An embodiment of the invention is disclosed as a method for decoding a stream of encoded video data including a plurality of partitions that have been compressed using at least a first encoding scheme. The method includes selecting at least a first one of the partitions that includes at least one row of blocks that has been encoded using at least a second encoding scheme. A second partition is selected that includes at least one row of blocks encoded using the second encoding scheme. The first partition is decoded by a first processor, and the second partition is decoded by a second processor. The decoding of the second partition is offset by a specified number of blocks so that at least a portion of the output from the decoding of the first partition is used as input in decoding the second partition. Further, the decoding of the first partition is offset by a specified number of blocks so that at least a portion of the output from the decoding of the second partition is used as input in decoding the first partition.

The description herein makes reference to the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the several views, and wherein:

FIG. 1 is a diagram of the hierarchy of layers in a compressed video bitstream in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a video compression system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a video decompression system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a frame and its corresponding partitions outputted from the video compression system of FIG. 2.

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of an encoded video frame in a bitstream outputted from the video compression system of FIG. 2 and sent to the video decompression system of FIG. 3.

FIGS. 6A-6B arc timing diagrams illustrating the staging and synchronization of cores on a multi-core processor used in the video decompression system of FIG. 3.

FIG. 7A is a schematic diagram showing data-dependent macroblocks and an offset calculation based used in the video compression and decompression systems of FIGS. 2 and 3.

FIG. 7B is a schematic diagram showing data-dependent macroblocks and an alternative offset calculation used in the video compression and decompression systems of FIGS. 2 and 3.

Referring to FIG. 1, video coding standards, such as H.264, provide a defined hierarchy of layers 10 for a video stream 11. The highest level in the layer can be a video sequence 13. At the next level, video sequence 13 consists of a number of adjacent frames 15. Number of adjacent frames 15 can be further subdivided into a single frame 17. At the next level, frame 17 can be composed of a series of fix-sized macroblocks 20, which contain compressed data corresponding to, for example, a 16×16 block of displayed pixels in frame 17. Each macroblock contains luminance and chrominance data for the corresponding pixels. Macroblocks 20 can also be of any other suitable size such as 16×8 pixel groups or 8×16 pixel groups. Macroblocks 20 are further subdivided into blocks. A block, for example, can be a 4×4 pixel group that can further describe the luminance and chrominance data for the corresponding pixels. Blocks can also be of any other suitable size such as 16×16, 16×8, 8×16, 8×8, 8×4, 4×8 and 4×4 pixels groups.

Although the description of embodiments are described in the context of the VP8 video coding format, alternative embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in the context of other video coding formats. Further, the embodiments are not limited to any specific video coding standard or format.

Referring to FIG. 2, in accordance with one embodiment, to encode an input video stream 16, an encoder 14 performs the following functions in a forward path (shown by the solid connection lines) to produce an encoded bitstream 26: intra/inter prediction 18, transform 19, quantization 22 and entropy encoding 24. Encoder 14 also includes a reconstruction path (shown by the dotted connection lines) to reconstruct a frame for encoding of further macroblocks. Encoder 14 performs the following functions in the reconstruction path: dequantization 28, inverse transformation 30, reconstruction 32 and loop filtering 34. Other structural variations of encoder 14 can be used to encode bitstream 26.

When input video stream 16 is presented for encoding, each frame 17 within input video stream 16 can be processed in units of macroblocks. At intra/inter prediction stage 18, each macroblock can be encoded using either intra prediction or inter prediction mode. In the case of intra-prediction, a prediction macroblock can be formed from samples in the current frame that have been previously encoded and reconstructed. In the case of inter-prediction, a prediction macroblock can be formed from one or more reference frames that have already been encoded and reconstructed.

Next, still referring to FIG. 2, the prediction macroblock can be subtracted from the current macroblock to produce a residual macroblock (residual). Transform stage 19 transform codes the residual signal to coefficients and quantization stage 22 quantizes the coefficients to provide a set of quantized transformed coefficients. The quantized transformed coefficients are then entropy coded by entropy encoding stage 24. The entropy-coded coefficients, together with the information required to decode the macroblock, such as the type of prediction mode used, motion vectors and quantizer value, are output to compressed bitstream 26.

The reconstruction path in FIG. 2, can be present to permit that both the encoder and the decoder use the same reference frames required to decode the macroblocks. The reconstruction path, similar to functions that take place during the decoding process, which arc discussed in more detail below, includes dequantizing the transformed coefficients by dequantization stage 28 and inverse transforming the coefficients by inverse transform stage 30 to produce a derivative residual macroblock (derivative residual). At the reconstruction stage 32, the prediction macroblock can be added to the derivative residual to create a reconstructed macroblock. A loop filter 34 can he applied to the reconstructed macroblock to reduce distortion.

Referring to FIG. 3, in accordance with one embodiment, to decode compressed bitstream 26, a decoder 21, similar to the reconstruction path of encoder 14 discussed previously, performs the following functions to produce an output video stream 35: entropy decoding 25, dequantization 27, inverse transformation 29, intra/inter prediction 23, reconstruction 31, loop filter 34 and deblocking filtering 33. Other structural variations of decoder 21 can be used to decode compressed bitstream 26.

When compressed bitstream 26 is presented for decoding, the data elements can be decoded by entropy decoding stage 25 to produce a set of quantized coefficients. Dequantization stage 27 dequantizes and inverse transform stage 29 inverse transforms the coefficients to produce a derivative residual that is identical to that created by the reconstruction stage in encoder 14. Using the type of prediction mode and/or motion vector information decoded from the compressed bitstream 26, at intra/inter prediction stage 23, decoder 21 creates the same prediction macroblock as was created in encoder 14. At the reconstruction stage 33, the prediction macroblock can be added to the derivative residual to create a reconstructed macroblock. The loop filter 34 can be applied to the reconstructed macroblock to reduce blocking artifacts. A deblocking filter 33 can be applied to video image frames to further reduce blocking distortion and the result can he outputted to output video stream 35.

Current context-based entropy coding methods, such as Context-based Adaptive Arithmetic Coding (CABAC), are limited by dependencies that exploit spatial locality by requiring macroblocks to reference neighboring macroblocks and that exploit temporal localities by requiring macroblocks to reference macroblocks from another frame. Because of these dependencies and the adaptivity, encoder 14 codes the bitstream in a sequential order using context data from neighboring macroblocks. Such sequential dependency created by encoder 14 causes the compressed bitstream 26 to be decoded in a sequential fashion by decoder 21. Such sequential decoding can be adequate when decoding using a single-core processor. On the other hand, if a multi-core processor or a multi-processor system is used during decoding, the computing power of the multi-core processor or the multi-processor system would not be effectively utilized.

Although the disclosure has and will continue to describe embodiments of the present invention with reference to a multi-core processor and the creation of threads on the multi-core processor, embodiments of the present invention can also be implemented with other suitable computer systems, such as a device containing multiple processors.

According to one embodiment, encoder 14 divides the compressed bitstream into partitions 36 rather than a single stream of serialized data. With reference to FIG. 4 and by way of example only, the compressed bitstream can be divided into four partitions, which are designated as Data Partitions 1-4. Other numbers of partitions are also suitable. Since each partition can be the subject of a separate decoding process when they are decoded by decoder 21, the serialized dependency can be broken up in the compressed data without losing coding efficiency.

Referring to FIG. 4, frame 17 is shown with divided macroblock rows 38. Macroblock rows 38 consist of individual macroblocks 20. Continuing with the example, every Nth macroblock row 38 can be grouped into one of partitions 36 (where N is the total number of partitions). In this example, there are four partitions and macroblock rows 0, 4, 8, 12, etc. are grouped into partition 1. Macroblock rows 1, 5, 9 and 13, etc. are grouped into partition 2. Macroblock rows 2, 6, 10, 14, etc. are grouped into partition 3. Macroblock rows 3, 7, 11, 15, etc. are grouped into partition 4. As a result, each partition 36 includes contiguous macroblocks, but in this instance, each partition 36 does not contain contiguous macroblock rows 38. In other words, macroblock rows of blocks in the first partition and macroblock rows in the second partition can be derived from two adjacent macroblock rows in a frame. Other grouping mechanisms arc also available and arc not limited to separating regions by macroblock row or grouping every Nth macroblock row into a partition. Depending on the grouping mechanism, in another example, macroblock rows that are contiguous may also be grouped into the same partition 36.

An alternative grouping mechanism may include, for example, grouping a row of blocks from a first frame and a corresponding row of blocks in a second frame. The row of blocks from the first frame can be packed in the first partition and the corresponding row of blocks in the second frame can be packed in the second partition. A first processor can decode the row of blocks from the first frame and a second processor can decode the row of blocks from the second frame. In this manner, the decoder can decode at least one block in the second partition using information from a block that is already decoded by the first processor.

Each of the partitions 36 can be compressed using two separate encoding schemes. The first encoding scheme can be lossless encoding using, for example, context-based arithmetic coding like CABAC. Other lossless encoding techniques may also be used. Referring back to FIG. 1, the first encoding scheme may be realized by, for example, entropy encoding stage 24.

Still referring to FIG. 1, the second encoding scheme, which can take place before the first encoding scheme, may be realized by at least one of intra/inter prediction stage 18, transform stage 19, and quantization 22. The second encoding scheme can encode blocks in each of the partitions 36 by using information contained in other partitions. For example, if a frame is divided into two partitions, the second encoding scheme can encode the second partition using information contained in the macroblock rows of the first partition.

Referring to FIG. 5, an encoded video frame 39 from compressed bitstream 26 is shown. For simplicity, only parts of the bitstream that are pertinent to embodiments of the invention are shown. Encoded video frame 39 contains a video frame header 44 which contains bits for a number of partitions 40 and bits for offsets of each partition 42. Encoded video frame 39 also includes the encoded data from data partitions 36 illustrated as P1-PN where, as discussed previously, N is the total number of partitions in video frame 17.

Once encoder 14 has divided frame 17 into partitions 36, encoder 14 writes data into video frame header 44 to indicate number of partitions 40 and offsets of each partition 42. Number of partitions 40 and offsets of each partition 42 can be represented in frame 17 by a bit, a byte or any other record that can relay the specific information to decoder 21. Decoder 21 reads the number of data partitions 40 from video frame header 44 in order to decode the compressed data. In one example, two bits may be used to represent the number of partitions. One or more bits can be used to indicate the number of data partitions (or partition count). Other coding schemes can also be used to code the number of partitions into the bitstream. The following list indicates how two bits can represent the number of partitions:

BIT 1 BIT 2 NUMBER OF PARTITIONS
0 0 One partition
0 1 Two partitions
1 0 Four partitions
1 1 Eight partitions

If the number of data partitions is greater than one, decoder 21 also needs information about the positions of the data partitions 36 within the compressed bitstream 26. The offsets of each partition 42 (also referred to as partition location offsets) enable direct access to each partition during decoding.

In one example, offset of each partition 42 can be relative to the beginning of the bitstream and can be encoded and written into the bitstream 26. In another example, the offset for each data partition can be encoded and written into the bitstream except for the first partition since the first partition implicitly begins in the bitstream 26 after the offsets of each partition 42. The foregoing is merely exemplary. Other suitable data structures, flags or records such words and bytes, can be used to transmit partition count and partition location offset information.

Although the number of data partitions can be the same for each frame 17 throughout the input video sequence 16, the number of data partitions may also differ from frame to frame. Accordingly, each frame 17 would have a different number of partitions 40. The number of bits that are used to represent the number of partitions may also differ from frame to frame. Accordingly, each frame 17 could be divided into varying numbers of partitions.

Once the data has been compressed into bit stream 26 with the proper partition data information (i.e. number of partitions 40 and offsets of partitions 42), decoder 21 can decode the data partitions 36 on a multi-core processor in parallel. In this manner, each processor core may be responsible for decoding one of the data partitions 36. Since multi-core processors typically have more than one processing core and shared memory space, the workload can be allocated between each core as evenly as possible. Each core can use the shared memory space as an efficient way of sharing data between each core decoding each data partition 36.

For example, if there are two processors decoding two partitions, respectively, the first processor will begin decoding the first partition. The second processor can then decode macroblocks of the second partition and can use information received from the first processor, which has begun decoding macroblocks of the first partition. Concurrently with the second processor, the first processor can continue decoding macroblocks of the first partition and can use information received from the second processor. Accordingly, both the first and second processors can have the information necessary to properly decode macroblocks in their respective partitions.

Furthermore, as discussed in more detail below, when decoding a macroblock row of the second partition that is dependent on the first partition, a macroblock that is currently being processed in the second partition is offset by a specified number of macroblocks. In this manner, at least a portion of the output of the decoding of the first partition can be used as input in the decoding of the macroblock that is currently being processed in the second partition. Likewise, when decoding a macroblock row of the first partition that is dependent on the second partition, a macroblock that is currently being processed in the first partition is offset by a specified number of macroblocks so that at least a portion of the output of the decoding of the second partition can be used as input in the decoding of the macroblock that is currently being processed in the first partition.

When decoding the compressed bitstream, decoder 21 determines the number of threads needed to decode the data, which can be based on the number of partitions 40 in each encoded frame 39. For example, if number of partitions 40 indicates that there are four partitions in encoded frame 39, decoder 21 creates four threads with each thread decoding one of the data partitions. Referring to FIG. 4, as an example, decoder 21 can determine that four data partitions have been created. Hence, if decoder 21 is using a multi-core processor, it can create four separate threads to decode the data from that specific frame.

As discussed previously, macroblocks 20 within each frame use context data from neighboring macroblocks when being encoded. When decoding macroblocks 20, the decoder will need the same context data in order to decode the macroblocks properly. On the decoder side, the context data can be available only after the neighboring macroblocks have already been decoded by the current thread or other threads. In order to decode properly, the decoder includes a staging and synchronization mechanism for managing the decoding of the multiple threads.

With reference to FIGS. 6A and 6B, a time diagram shows the staging and synchronization mechanism to decode partitions 36 on threads of a multi-core processor in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate an exemplary partial image frame 45 at various stages of the decoding process. The example is simplified for purposes of this disclosure and the number of partitions 36 is limited to three. Each partition 36 can be assigned to one of the three threads 46, 48 and 50. As discussed previously, each partition 36 includes contiguous macroblocks.

As depicted in FIGS. 6A and 6B, as an example, three threads 46, 48 and 50 arc shown, and each of threads 46, 48 and 50 are capable of performing decoding in parallel with each other. Each of the three threads 46, 48 and 50 processes one partition in a serial manner while all three partitions 40 are processed in parallel with each other.

Each of FIGS. 6A and 6B contain an arrow that illustrates which macroblock is currently being decoded in each macroblock row, which macroblocks have been decoded in each macroblock row, and which macroblocks have yet to be decoded in each macroblock row. If the arrow is pointing to a specific macroblock, that macroblock is currently being decoded. Any macroblock to the left of the arrow (if any) has already been decoded in that row. Any macroblock to the right of the arrow has yet to be decoded. Although the macroblocks illustrated in FIGS. 6A and 6B all have similar sizes, the techniques of this disclosure are not limited in this respect. Other block sizes, as discussed previously, can also be used with embodiments of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 6A, at time t1, thread 46 has initiated decoding of a first macroblock row 52. Thread 46 is currently processing macroblock j in first macroblock row 52 as shown by arrow 58. Macroblocks 0 to j−1 have already been decoded in first macroblock row 52. Macroblocks j+1 to the end of first macroblock row 52 have yet to be decoded in first macroblock row 52. Thread 48 has also initiated decoding of a second macroblock row 54. Thread 48 is currently processing macroblock 0 in second macroblock row 54 as shown by arrow 60. Macroblocks 1 to the end of second macroblock row 54 have been decoded in second macroblock row 54. Thread 50 has not begun decoding of a third macroblock row 56. No macroblocks have been decoded or are currently being decoded in third macroblock row 56.

Referring to FIG. 6B, at time t2, thread 46 has continued decoding of first macroblock row 52. Thread 46 is currently processing macroblock j*2 in first macroblock row 52 as shown by arrow 62. Macroblocks 0 to j*2-1 have already been decoded in first macroblock row 52. Macroblocks j*2+1 to the end of first macroblock row 52 have yet to be decoded in first macroblock row 52. Thread 48 has also continued decoding of second macroblock row 54. Thread 48 is currently processing macroblock j in second macroblock row 54 as shown by arrow 64. Macroblocks 0 to j−1 have already been decoded in second macroblock row 54. Macroblocks j+1 to the end of second macroblock row 54 have yet to be decoded in second macroblock row 54. Thread 50 has also initiated decoding of a third macroblock row 56. Thread 50 is currently processing macroblock 0 in third macroblock row 56 as shown by arrow 66. Macroblocks 1 to the end of third macroblock row 56 have yet to be decoded in third macroblock row 56.

Previous decoding mechanisms were unable to efficiently use a multi-core processor to decode a compressed bitstream because processing of a macroblock row could not be initiated until the upper adjacent macroblock row had been completely decoded. The difficulty of previous decoding mechanisms stems from the encoding phase. When data is encoded using traditional encoding techniques, spatial dependencies within macroblocks imply a specific order of processing of the macroblocks. Furthermore, once the frame has been encoded, a specific macroblock row cannot be discerned until the row has been completely decoded. Accordingly, video coding methods incorporating entropy coding methods such as CABAC created serialized dependencies which were passed to the decoder. As a result of these serialized dependencies, decoding schemes had limited efficiency because information for each computer processing system (e.g. threads 46, 48 and 50) was not available until the decoding process has been completed on that macroblock row.

Utilizing the parallel processing staging and synchronization mechanism illustrated in FIGS. 6A and 6B allows decoder 21 to efficiently accelerate the decoding process of image frames. Because each partition 36 can be subject to a separate decoding process, interdependencies between partitions can be managed by embodiments of the staging and synchronization scheme discussed previously in connection with FIGS. 6A and 6B. Using this staging and synchronization decoding scheme, each thread 46, 48 and 50 that decodes an assigned partition can exploit context data from neighboring macroblocks. Thus, decoder 21 can decode macroblocks that contain context data necessary to decode a current macroblock before the preceding macroblock row has been completely decoded.

Referring again to FIGS. 6A and 6B, offset j can be determined by examining the size of the context data used in the preceding macroblock row (e.g. measured in a number of macroblocks) during the encoding process. Offset j can be represented in frame 17 by a bit, a byte or any other record that can relay the size of the context data to decoder 21. FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate two alternatives for the size of offset j.

Referring to FIG. 7A, in one embodiment, current macroblock 68 is currently being processed. Current macroblock 68 uses context data from the left, top-left, top and top-right macroblocks during encoding. In other words, current macroblock 68 uses information from macroblocks: (r+1, c−1), (r, c−1), (r, c) and (r, c+1). In order to properly decode current macroblock 68, macroblocks (r+1, c−1), (r, c−1), (r, c) and (r, c+1) should be decoded before current macroblock 68. Since, as discussed previously, decoding of macroblocks can be performed in a serial fashion, macroblock (r+1, c−1) can be decoded before current macroblock 68. Further, in the preceding macroblock row (i.e. macroblock row r), since the encoding process uses (r, c+1) as the rightmost macroblock, the decoder can use (r, c+1) as the rightmost macroblock during decoding as well. Thus, offset j can be determined by subtracting the column row position of rightmost macroblock of the preceding row used during encoding of the current macroblock from the column row position of the current macroblock being processed. In FIG. 7A, offset j would be determined by subtracting the column row position of macroblock (r, c+1) from the column position of current macroblock 68 (i.e. (r+1, c)), or c+1−c, giving rise to an offset of 1.

Referring to FIG. 7B, in one embodiment, current macroblock 68′ is currently being processed. Current macroblock 68′ uses information from macroblocks: (r+1, c−1), (r, c−1), (r, c), (r, c+1), (r, c+2), and (r, c+3). In order to properly decode current macroblock 68′, macroblocks (r+1, c−1), (r, c−1), (r, c) (r, c+1), (r, c+2) and (r, c+3) should be decoded before current macroblock 68′. Since, as discussed previously, decoding of macroblocks can be performed in a serial fashion, macroblock (r+1, c−1) can be decoded before current macroblock 68′. Further, in the preceding macroblock row (i.e. macroblock row r), since the encoding process uses (r, c+3) as the rightmost macroblock, the decoder can use (r, c+3) as the rightmost macroblock during decoding as well. As discussed previously, offset j can be determined by subtracting the column row position of rightmost macroblock of the preceding row used during encoding of the current macroblock from the column row position of the current macroblock being processed. In FIG. 7A, offset j would be calculated by subtracting the column row position of macroblock (r, c+3) from the column position of current macroblock 68′ (i.e. (r+1, c)), or c+3−c, giving rise to an offset of 3.

In the preferred embodiment, the offset can be determined by the specific requirements of the codec. In alternative embodiments, the offset can be specified in the bitstream.

While the invention has been described in connection with certain embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not to he limited to the disclosed embodiments but, on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims, which scope is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures as is permitted under the law.

Bankoski, James, Xu, Yaowu, Wilkins, Paul

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
3825832,
4719642, Feb 27 1985 SCIENTIFIC ATLANTA, INC , A CORP OF GA Error detection and concealment using predicted signal values
4729127, Oct 20 1981 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, THE Method and system for compression and reconstruction of cultural data for use in a digital moving map display
4736446, Mar 29 1985 Quad-Tech Inc.; QUAD-TECH, INC Cutoff control system
4797729, Feb 05 1988 Eastman Kodak Company System incorporating an error tolerant picture compression algorithm
4868764, Apr 14 1986 U S PHILIPS CORPORATION, 100 EAST 42ND STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10017 A CORP OF DE Image encoding and decoding method and apparatus
4891748, May 30 1986 MODELGOLF LLC System and method for teaching physical skills
5068724, Jun 15 1990 CIF LICENSING, LLC Adaptive motion compensation for digital television
5083214, May 02 1990 Eastman Kodak Company Apparatus and methods for extracting data from a scanned bit-mapped data strip
5091782, Apr 09 1990 CIF LICENSING, LLC Apparatus and method for adaptively compressing successive blocks of digital video
5136371, Mar 15 1990 THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC , A CORP OF DE Digital image coding using random scanning
5136376, Oct 14 1989 SONY CORPORATION, A CORP OF JAPAN Method of coding video signals and transmission system thereof
5164819, Apr 03 1991 Method and system for coding and compressing color video signals
5225832, Feb 13 1992 Transpacific IP Ltd High speed variable length decoder
5270812, Jul 20 1990 U S PHILIPS CORPORATION, A CORP OF DE Method of encoding image pixel values for storage as compressed digital data and method of decoding the compressed digital data
5274442, Oct 22 1991 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Adaptive blocking image signal coding system
5313306, Feb 08 1993 Sony Corporation Omniview motionless camera endoscopy system
5341440, Jul 12 1991 Method and apparatus for increasing information compressibility
5381145, Feb 10 1993 Ricoh Company, LTD Method and apparatus for parallel decoding and encoding of data
5432870, Jun 30 1993 Ricoh Company, LTD Method and apparatus for compressing and decompressing images of documents
5452006, Oct 25 1993 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD Two-part synchronization scheme for digital video decoders
5561477, Oct 26 1994 Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. System for coding a video signal in the presence of an image intensity gradient
5576765, Mar 17 1994 MEDIATEK INC Video decoder
5576767, Feb 03 1993 Qualcomm Incorporated Interframe video encoding and decoding system
5589945, Jan 11 1993 NISSIM CORP , A FLORIDA CORPORATION Computer-themed playing system
5604539, Aug 21 1992 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing method and apparatus
5646690, Jun 14 1994 MAPLE VISION TECHNOLOGIES INC Apparatus for parallel decoding of digital video signals
5659539, Jul 14 1995 ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC Method and apparatus for frame accurate access of digital audio-visual information
5696869, Feb 07 1992 NISSIM CORP Variable-content-video provider system
5734744, Jun 07 1995 Pixar Method and apparatus for compression and decompression of color data
5737020, Mar 27 1995 International Business Machines Corporation Adaptive field/frame encoding of discrete cosine transform
5748247, Apr 08 1996 GRASS VALLEY US INC Refinement of block motion vectors to achieve a dense motion field
5774593, Jul 24 1995 WASHINGTON, UNIVERSITY OF, THE Automatic scene decomposition and optimization of MPEG compressed video
5793647, Aug 15 1995 LMI TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED System and method for graphical image data acquistion, storage, and retrieval
5794179, Jul 27 1995 JVC Kenwood Corporation Method and apparatus for performing bit-allocation coding for an acoustic signal of frequency region and time region correction for an acoustic signal and method and apparatus for decoding a decoded acoustic signal
5818530, Jun 19 1996 Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc MPEG compatible decoder including a dual stage data reduction network
5818969, May 12 1995 U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT Intelligent start for motion estimation search
5828370, Jul 01 1996 OPEN TV, INC ; OPENTV, INC Video delivery system and method for displaying indexing slider bar on the subscriber video screen
5835144, Oct 13 1994 INPHI CORPORATION Methods of coding and decoding moving-picture signals, using self-resynchronizing variable-length codes
5883671, Jun 05 1996 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for partitioning compressed digital video bitstream for decoding by multiple independent parallel decoders
5903264, Jul 01 1996 OPENTV, INC Video delivery system and method for displaying an indexing slider bar
5929940, Oct 25 1995 U S PHILIPS CORPORATION Method and device for estimating motion between images, system for encoding segmented images
5930493, Jun 07 1995 GOOGLE LLC Multimedia server system and method for communicating multimedia information
5963203, Jul 03 1997 Sony Corporation Interactive video icon with designated viewing position
5999641, Nov 18 1993 GOOGLE LLC System for manipulating digitized image objects in three dimensions
6014706, Jan 30 1997 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Methods and apparatus for implementing control functions in a streamed video display system
6041145, Nov 02 1995 MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO , LTD Device and method for smoothing picture signal, device and method for encoding picture and device and method for decoding picture
6061397, Apr 19 1994 Sony Corporation Motion vector detecting device
6084908, Oct 25 1995 MEDIATEK, INC Apparatus and method for quadtree based variable block size motion estimation
6108383, Jul 15 1997 GOOGLE LLC Method and apparatus for compression and decompression of video images
6112234, Jul 01 1997 STAIR SYSTEMS, INC NORTH CAROLINA CORP Method for transfer of radiographic images
6115501, Jul 10 1995 Hyundai Curitel, Inc Grid moving method for minimizing image information of an object
6119154, Jul 14 1995 Alcatel Lucent Method and apparatus for non-sequential access to an in-progress video feed
6141381, Apr 25 1997 RAKUTEN, INC Motion compensation encoding apparatus and motion compensation encoding method for high-efficiency encoding of video information through selective use of previously derived motion vectors in place of motion vectors derived from motion estimation
6160846, Oct 25 1995 MEDIATEK, INC Apparatus and method for optimizing the rate control in a coding system
6167164, Mar 10 1997 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO , LTD One-dimensional signal adaptive filter for reducing blocking effect and filtering method
6181742, Jan 26 1998 International Business Machines Corporation Single pass target allocation for video encoding
6181822, May 12 1993 GOOGLE LLC Data compression apparatus and method
6185363, Jun 02 1997 Philips Electronics North America Corporation Visual indexing system
6188799, Feb 07 1997 MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES CO LTD Method and apparatus for removing noise in still and moving pictures
6240135, Sep 09 1997 LG Electronics Inc Method of removing blocking artifacts in a coding system of a moving picture
6292837, Oct 30 1997 GOOGLE LLC Apparatus and method for non-sequential image data transmission and display
6327304, May 12 1993 GOOGLE LLC Apparatus and method to digitally compress video signals
6366704, Dec 01 1997 Sharp Laboratories of America, Inc. Method and apparatus for a delay-adaptive rate control scheme for the frame layer
6370267, Nov 18 1993 GOOGLE LLC System for manipulating digitized image objects in three dimensions
6400763, Feb 18 1999 HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P Compression system which re-uses prior motion vectors
6496537, Dec 18 1996 THOMSON LICENSING S A Video decoder with interleaved data processing
6522784, Apr 11 2000 International Business Machines Corporation Enhanced compression of gray-level images
6529638, Feb 01 1999 RAKUTEN, INC Block boundary artifact reduction for block-based image compression
6560366, Dec 16 1995 GOOGLE LLC Method for analyzing the content of a video signal
6594315, Dec 18 1996 THOMSON LICENSING S A Formatting of recompressed data in an MPEG decoder
6687303, Mar 17 1999 Renesas Technology Corp Motion vector detecting device
6697061, Jan 21 1999 HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY L P Image compression featuring selective re-use of prior compression data
6707952, May 30 2000 Sharp Laboratories of America, Inc.; Sharp Laboratories of America, Inc Method for removing ringing artifacts from locations near dominant edges of an image reconstructed after compression
6765964, Dec 06 2000 Intel Corporation System and method for intracoding video data
6876703, May 11 2000 CISCO SYSTEMS CANADA CO Method and apparatus for video coding
6934419, Apr 11 2000 International Business Machines Corporation Enhanced compression of gray-level images
6985526, Dec 28 1999 UNILOC 2017 LLC SNR scalable video encoding method and corresponding decoding method
6987866, Jun 05 2001 U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT Multi-modal motion estimation for video sequences
7003035, Jan 25 2002 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Video coding methods and apparatuses
7023916, Aug 07 1998 Infineon Technologies AG Method and device for estimating motion in a digitized image with pixels
7027654, Aug 16 2001 GOOGLE LLC Video compression system
7170937, May 01 2002 Texas Instruments Incorporated Complexity-scalable intra-frame prediction technique
7227589, Dec 22 1999 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for video decoding on a multiprocessor system
7236524, May 28 2002 Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation Methods and systems for image intra-prediction mode communication
7330509, Sep 12 2003 International Business Machines Corporation Method for video transcoding with adaptive frame rate control
7499492, Jun 28 2004 GOOGLE LLC Video compression and encoding method
7606310, Jun 28 2004 GOOGLE LLC Video compression and encoding method
7764739, Feb 13 2004 Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 Moving picture encoding device and method with time constraint
7813570, Sep 13 2004 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Accelerated video encoding using a graphics processing unit
8175161, Sep 12 2008 ARECONT VISION COSTAR, LLC System and method for motion estimation
8213518, Oct 31 2006 SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT INC Multi-threaded streaming data decoding
8265144, Jun 30 2007 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Innovations in video decoder implementations
8401084, Apr 01 2002 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LIMITED System and method for multi-row decoding of video with dependent rows
8520734, Jul 31 2009 Teradici Corporation Method and system for remotely communicating a computer rendered image sequence
8743979, Jul 12 2010 INDUSTRIAL COOPERATION FOUNDATION CHONBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Method for precoding and decoding distributing MIMO channels in relay-based DF cooperative wireless networks
8767817, Apr 07 2011 GOOGLE LLC Apparatus and method for coding using parameterized equation
8948267, Nov 21 2007 Synaptics Incorporated System and method of video coding using adaptive macroblock processing
9100509, Feb 07 2012 GOOGLE LLC Dynamic bit allocation in parallel video encoding
9100657, Dec 07 2011 GOOGLE LLC Encoding time management in parallel real-time video encoding
20020012396,
20020031184,
20020039386,
20020168114,
20030023982,
20030189982,
20030215018,
20030219072,
20040028142,
20040066852,
20040120400,
20040228410,
20040240556,
20040258151,
20050050002,
20050053157,
20050117655,
20050147165,
20050169374,
20050210145,
20050259747,
20050265447,
20050265461,
20050276323,
20060072674,
20060098737,
20060109912,
20060114985,
20060126726,
20060126740,
20060150151,
20060215758,
20060239345,
20060256858,
20060291567,
20070025441,
20070053443,
20070086528,
20070092006,
20070140342,
20070229704,
20070286288,
20080056348,
20080152014,
20080159407,
20080198270,
20080198920,
20080212678,
20080215317,
20080240254,
20080267295,
20080298469,
20080317364,
20090002379,
20090003447,
20090052529,
20090080534,
20090168893,
20090225845,
20090238277,
20090245349,
20090249178,
20100061455,
20100158109,
20100177826,
20100183076,
20100189179,
20100215263,
20100239181,
20100246665,
20100316132,
20110261884,
20120014451,
20120128069,
20120147958,
20120213448,
20120294376,
20120307892,
20130034150,
20130083161,
20130259137,
20150043645,
20150326888,
20170188024,
JP2007166625,
JP3510433,
WO2008020470,
WO2008036237,
WO2010063184,
/////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Mar 24 2009WILKINS, PAULON2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0649510738 pdf
Jun 15 2009XU, YAOWUON2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0649510738 pdf
Jun 15 2009BANKOSKI, JAMESON2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0649510738 pdf
Feb 19 2010ON2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC ON2 TECHNOLOGIES, LLCMERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0649510918 pdf
Oct 28 2010ON2 TECHNOLOGIES, LLCGoogle IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0649520033 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Mar 12 2021BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code).


Date Maintenance Schedule
Nov 14 20264 years fee payment window open
May 14 20276 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Nov 14 2027patent expiry (for year 4)
Nov 14 20292 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Nov 14 20308 years fee payment window open
May 14 20316 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Nov 14 2031patent expiry (for year 8)
Nov 14 20332 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Nov 14 203412 years fee payment window open
May 14 20356 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Nov 14 2035patent expiry (for year 12)
Nov 14 20372 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)