medical and/or robotic devices, systems and methods can provide an indicator associated with each manipulator assembly of a multi-arm telerobotic or telesurgical system. The exemplary indicator comprises a multi-color light emitting diode (LED) mounted to a manipulator moving an associated surgical instrument, allowing the indicator to display any of a wide variety of signals. The invention may provide an additional user interface to facilitate communications between the telesurgical system and/or members of a telesurgical team.
|
13. A medical system comprising:
a master controller configured to be operated by a user;
a manipulator adapted to hold and manipulate a surgical instrument, the manipulator having at least one activatable indicator on or proximate to the manipulator so as to viewable by an assistant positioned near the manipulator;
a display screen proximate to the manipulator so as to be viewable by the assistant positioned near the manipulator, but not viewable by the user while the user is operating the master controller; and
a computer processor programmed to control movement of the manipulator in response to manipulation of the master controller, control activation of the at least one activatable indicator so as to indicate that an action is to be taken by the assistant, and provide instructions on the display screen for the action to be taken when the at least one activatable indicator is activated.
1. A medical system comprising:
a first manipulator supporting a first tool, the first manipulator having a first indicator on an outer surface of the first manipulator;
a first input device operatively coupled to the first manipulator;
a second manipulator supporting a second tool, the second manipulator having a second indicator on an outer surface of the second manipulator;
a second input device operatively coupled to the second manipulator; and
a processor programmed to command a selected one of the first and second indicators to output a first identifiable signal;
wherein the selected one of the first and second indicators indicates one of: a selected manipulator of the first and second manipulators, a selected tool of the first and second tools, and a selected input device of the first and second input devices; and
wherein the first identifiable signal indicates one of: a state or an identity of the selected manipulator, a state or an identity of the selected tool, and a state or an identity of the selected input device.
2. The medical system of
3. The medical system of
4. The medical system of
6. The medical system of
7. The medical system of
8. The medical system of
9. The medical system of
10. The medical system of
11. The medical system of
12. The medical system of
a display;
the processor being programmed to cause a graphical indication that corresponds to the first identifiable signal to be displayed on the display.
14. The medical system of
a monitor screen positioned proximate to the master controller so as to be viewable by the user, but not viewable by the assistant near the manipulator;
wherein the computer processor is programmed to display information associated with the activation of the at least one activatable indicator on the monitor screen.
15. The medical system of
16. The medical system of
17. The medical system of
18. The medical system of
|
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/214,439 (filed Aug. 22, 2011), now U.S. Pat. No. 9,259,276 B2, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/478,416 (filed Jun. 26, 2006), now U.S. Pat. No. 8,100,133 B2, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/695,611 (filed Jun. 30, 2005), each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
NOT APPLICABLE
NOT APPLICABLE
The present invention is generally related to medical and/or robotic devices, systems, and methods. In an exemplary embodiment, the invention provides an indicator associated with one or more robotic manipulator assemblies for communication of a state of the manipulator assembly or other component of the robotic system, for identification of one or more particular manipulators, or the like. The indicator(s) can provide an additional user interface between the robotic system and, for example, a surgical assistant, system operator, or the like.
Minimally invasive medical techniques are intended to reduce the amount of extraneous tissue which is damaged during diagnostic or surgical procedures, thereby reducing patient recovery time, discomfort, and deleterious side effects. One effect of minimally invasive surgery, for example, may be reduced post-operative hospital recovery times. Because the average hospital stay for a standard surgery is typically significantly longer than the average stay for an analogous minimally invasive surgery, increased use of minimally invasive techniques could save millions of dollars in hospital costs each year. While many of the surgeries performed each year in the United States could potentially be performed in a minimally invasive manner, only a portion of the current surgeries use these advantageous techniques due to limitations in minimally invasive surgical instruments and the additional surgical training involved in mastering them.
Minimally invasive robotic surgical or telesurgical systems have been developed to increase a surgeon's dexterity and avoid some of the limitations on traditional minimally invasive techniques. In telesurgery, the surgeon uses some form of remote control, e.g., a servomechanism or the like, to manipulate surgical instrument movements, rather than directly holding and moving the instruments by hand. In telesurgery systems, the surgeon can be provided with an image of the surgical site at the surgical workstation. While viewing a two or three dimensional image of the surgical site on a display, the surgeon performs the surgical procedures on the patient by manipulating master control devices, which in turn control motion of the servomechanically operated instruments.
The servomechanism used for telesurgery will often accept input from two master controllers (one for each of the surgeon's hands) and may include two or more robotic arms or manipulators on each of which a surgical instrument is mounted. Operative communication between master controllers and associated robotic arm and instrument assemblies is typically achieved through a control system. The control system typically includes at least one processor which relays input commands from the master controllers to the associated robotic arm and instrument assemblies and back from the instrument and arm assemblies to the associated master controllers in the case of, e.g., force feedback or the like. One example of a robotic surgical system is the DA VINCI® system available from Intuitive Surgical, Inc. of Mountain View, Calif.
The roles and interaction among the persons making up a telesurgical team may differ from those of conventional surgery. As telesurgery is often performed in an internal surgical site, at least some of those working under the direction of the lead surgeon (or other robotic system operator) may not have direct access to or direct visualization of the ongoing tissue manipulations. For example, surgical assistants within the operating room may remove a first surgical instrument (such as an electrosurgical scalpel) from a manipulator and replace it with a different surgical instrument (such as a needle holder), as a surgeon may desire the use of different surgical instruments during different phases of a surgical procedure. Similarly, the assistant may reposition a surgical instrument during a procedure, so that rather than approaching the procedure from a first minimally invasive access site, the instrument is advanced toward the internal surgical site from a second, different access site. More complex robotic systems (and team interactions) may also be used. For example, as surgery is often performed with more than two tools, input devices may be provided for one or more additional surgeons, with each additional surgeon robotically controlling (for example) at least one surgical instrument.
While the new telesurgical systems, devices and methods have proven highly effective and advantageous, still further improvements would be desirable. In general, it would be desirable to provide improved robotic and/or surgical devices, systems and methods, particularly for performing telesurgical procedures. It may also be desirable to provide improved techniques for communication among the members of a telesurgical team, and for interfacing with the telesurgical apparatus so as to more fully take advantage of the capabilities of telesurgery to provide enhanced patient outcomes with improved efficiencies. It may be particularly beneficial to avoid unnecessary interruptions and distractions of a surgeon or other system operator, and to avoid delays and/or mistakes in the coordinated activities of a telesurgical team.
The present invention is generally related to medical and/or robotic devices, systems and methods. An exemplary embodiment of the present invention provides a visual indicator associated with each manipulator assembly (and, hence, each surgical instrument) of a multi-arm telesurgical system. The exemplary indicator comprises a multi-color light emitting diode (LED), allowing the indicator to display any of a wide variety of signals through combinations of color, blinking, and the like. By establishing and using an appropriate indicator signal lexicography, the indicator can identify, for example:
In a first aspect, the invention provides a robotic method comprising moving a first end effector of a first manipulator assembly in response to a first robotic command. The first manipulator assembly has a first indicator. A second end effector of a second manipulator assembly is moved in response to a second robotic command. The second manipulator assembly has a second indicator. A command is transmitted from a processor, with the command being selectably directed to the first indicator and/or the second indicator.
In many embodiments, the end effectors will include the working ends of surgical instruments. The person receiving the identifiable signal will often be a member of a robotic surgical team within an operating room, with the processor acting as a master/slave telesurgical controller. In such embodiments, a movement command may be input by a system operator, and the system operator may also select which of the manipulator assemblies is to output the first signal. This can allow the system operator to maintain his or her concentration on movements of the end effectors shown in a display while communicating to, for example, an assistant regarding a specific surgical instrument. For example, rather than telling the assistant to “replace the electrosurgical scalpel on the arm now wiggling back and forth with a needle driver,” the surgeon can instead merely request a needle driver and activate the indicator of the appropriate manipulator assembly. Optionally, the processor may select the appropriate indicator and manipulator assembly, such as when the tool mounted on a manipulator reaches or exceeds its intended useful life.
The indicator will often include a visual indicator, with the first signal including a visual pattern such as blinking or the like, an identifiable color, or some other identifiable visual signal. In an exemplary telesurgical system, the indicators each include a plurality of light emitting diodes (LED). A variety of alternative indicators might also be employed, including any of the wide variety of light sources capable of generating different colors, audible indicators for generating tones or verbal signals, and the like. Preferably, a plurality of separately identifiable signals can be output from each indicator, thereby providing a user interface for communication to the assistant or the like regarding an associated manipulator assembly.
Typically, each manipulator assembly will include a manipulator movably supporting a tool holder, and a tool releasably mounted to the tool holder. The tool will generally include the end effector. The first identifiable signal may indicate, for example, a state of the tool, which specific manipulator assembly is operatively associated with a specific input device, an overall condition or state of all of the manipulator assemblies, an identity of one or more components of the selected manipulator assembly, or the like. Some listing or lexicography explaining the meaning of each identifiable signal will often be provided or known by the person receiving the signal, and that person will often take action in response to the signal, such as reconfiguring the manipulator assembly from which the signal is being output. The reconfiguration may include replacement of a tool of the manipulator assembly with another tool having a different (or the same) end effector, changing a mode of the manipulator assembly so as to initiate or inhibit master/slave movement of the end effector, or the like.
It will often be beneficial to include readily identifiable signal types or groups. For example, when the first signal includes a yellow color, it may communicate a warning that the associated manipulator assembly remains functional, but needs attention now or in the near future. A signal including a red color may communicate a sufficient fault along the robotic system chain to interrupt end effector movement.
A variety of refinements may be implemented with use of the manipulator assembly indicator. For example, the system operator who is inputting movement commands may benefit from graphical indicia in his or her display that corresponds to the first identifiable signal. Hence, when the system indicates that a tool is near the end of its life or the like by flashing the indicator, the same information may be communicated to the system operator by simple flashing of an icon on the operator's display screen, by superimposing a flashing color on the end effector of the instrument as shown in the display, or the like. In some embodiments, along with indicating which currently mounted tool or end effector is to be replaced, the processor may also energize another indicator associated with the new tool that is now desired, such as by flashing an LED at an appropriate location on a tool tray, or the like.
In another aspect, the invention provides a surgical robotic method comprising inputting a robotic movement command from a system operator to an input device. A surgical end effector of a manipulator assembly moves in response to the robotic command. The system operator views the movements of the end effector in a display while inputting the command. An identifiable visual signal is transmitted from a visual indicator of the manipulator assembly to a person nearby. In response, the person manually reconfigures the manipulator assembly.
In yet another aspect, the invention provides a surgical robotic system comprising a first manipulator assembly having a first indicator and a first end effector. The first end effector is movable in response to a first movement command. The second manipulator assembly has a second indicator and a second end effector. The second end effector is movable in response to a second movement command A processor is coupled to the first and second indicators, and selectively induces at least one of the indicators to output a first signal identifiable by a person nearby.
The present invention generally provides improved robotic and/or medical devices, systems and methods. Embodiments of the present invention are particularly well suited for telesurgery, often providing an additional form of user interface that can enhance communication between a surgical system operator, an assistant, any other members of a telesurgical team and/or the telesurgical system. Other embodiments of the invention may be well suited for use in other telerobotic or robotic environments, particularly with robotic systems having a plurality of manipulators.
Typically, manipulator system 6 includes at least 3 robotic manipulator assemblies. Two linkages 7 (mounted at the sides of the cart in this example) support and position manipulators 8 with linkages 7 in generally supporting a base of the manipulators 8 at a fixed location during at least a portion of the surgical procedure. Manipulators 8 move surgical tools 5 for robotic manipulation of tissues. One additional linkage 9 (mounted at the center of the cart in this example) supports and positions manipulator 10 which controls the motion of an endoscope/camera probe 11 to capture an image (preferably stereoscopic) of the internal surgical site. The fixable portion of positioning linkages 7, 9 of the patient-side system is sometimes referred to herein as a “set-up arm.”
The image of the internal surgical site is shown to operator O by a stereoscopic display 12 in surgeon's console 3. The internal surgical site is simultaneously shown to assistant A by an assistance display 14. Assistant A can help prior to and during a surgical procedure. Prior to surgery, assistant A typically covers at least a portion of the system with sterile drapes. Such draping of the system may include attaching sterile adapters, cannulas, and/or the like to manipulators 8, switching one or more of the manipulators into and out of a manually articulatable clutch mode, and the like. Assistant A also assists in prepositioning manipulator assemblies 8 and 10 relative to patient P using set-up linkage arms 7, 9; in swapping tools 5 from one or more of the surgical manipulators for alternative surgical tools or instruments 5′; in operating related non-robotic medical instruments and equipment; in manually moving a manipulator assembly so that the associated tool accesses the internal surgical site through a different aperture, and the like. Some or all of these activities may be facilitated by providing feedback to assistant A via the indicators described herein, with the indicators often providing feedback to the assistant regarding a state of the manipulator assembly, a state of the tool mounted thereon, and/or a state of the robotic surgical system.
In general terms, the linkages 7, 9 are used primarily during set-up of patient-side system 6, and typically remain in a fixed configuration during at least a portion of a surgical procedure. Manipulators 8, 10 each comprise a driven linkage which is actively articulated under the direction of surgeon's console 3. Although one or more of the joints of the set-up arm may optionally be driven and robotically controlled, at least some of the set-up arm joints may be configured for manual positioning by assistant A. Each associated combination of a set-up joint, manipulator and tool is encompassed within the term “manipulator assembly” as that term is used herein, although some manipulator assemblies may not include set-up joints, and the manipulator assembly will not include a tool at all times.
For convenience, a manipulator such as manipulator 8 that is supporting a surgical tool used to manipulate tissues is sometimes referred to as a patient-side manipulator (PSM), while a manipulator 10 which controls an image capture or data acquisition device such as endoscope 11 may be referred to as an endoscope-camera manipulator (ECM). The manipulators may optionally actuate, maneuver and control a wide variety of instruments, tools, image capture devices and the like which are useful for surgery.
As can be seen in
As can be seen in
It can be advantageous to avoid distracting system operator O during a surgical procedure so as to require the operator to shift his or her attention away from the internal surgical site. Even when assistant A is replacing a tool 5 with an alternative tool 5′, the system operator may continue manipulating tissues with another tool, or may want to continue to view the surgical site to monitor bleeding, and/or the like. Nonetheless, it may be difficult for the system operator to communicate clearly with assistant A regarding which tool 5 is to be replaced by an alternate tool. Specifically, as endoscope 11 may be at any convenient orientation, the tool associated with the right hand of system operator O will often not be disposed to the right of the endoscope, particularly as viewed by the assistant.
So as to unambiguously identify a tool 5 to be replaced assistant A, system operator O may input a command into workstation 3 (such as by pushing a button on the input device 2, actuating foot peddle, inputting a voice command, or the like) so that indicator 20 on the manipulator assembly associated with the specific tool 5 generates a visually identifiable signal that can be viewed by the assistant. A corresponding graphical indication of the signal may be provided to system operator O in display 12, such as presentation of an appropriate icon, superimposing of text on the surgical site, the use of image processing to superimpose false colors on the image of the appropriate end effector, or the like. In response to the signal on indicator 20, assistant A can remove and replace the identified tool 5. Optionally, each alternative tool 5′ may also have an associated indicator 20, allowing the processor to transmit a signal so as to indicate which alternative tool the system operator O is to be mounted on the robotic system.
There are a number of additional uses for indicators 20 in telesurgical system 1. For example, assistant A will often manually position tools 5 and endoscope 11 when setting up for a surgical procedure, when reconfiguring the manipulator system 6 for a different phase of a surgical procedure, when removing and replacing a tool with an alternate tool 5′, and the like. During such manual reconfiguring of the manipulator assembly by assistant A, the manipulator assembly may be placed in a different mode than is used during master/slave telesurgery, with the manually repositionable mode as sometimes being referred to as a clutch mode. The manipulator assembly may change between the tissue manipulation mode and the clutch mode in response to an input such as pushing a button on manipulator 8 (or some other component to the manipulator assembly) thereby allowing assistant A to change the manipulator mode. By generating appropriate visually identifiable signals with indicators 20 whenever the manipulator is in clutch mode, assistant A can avoid errors and increase the efficiency of the surgical procedure.
Indicators 20 may also show an associated identifiable signal when, for example, no tool is attached to the manipulator, when a sterile adaptor or interface between tool 5 and manipulator 8 is not properly attached, if an instrument mounted onto a manipulator is incompatible with that manipulator, if the instrument has reached the end of its useful life, and/or the like. For some of these signals, system operator O may initiate generation of the signal and may specify the associated manipulator assembly from which the signal is to be produced. In others, processor 4 may initiate the signal and/or indicate which manipulator assembly(s) are to be indicated. For example, in the case of a power failure, robotic system 1 may continue to operate using backup batteries. So as to indicate to the assistant A that a power failure has occurred, indicators 20 on all manipulators may blink, optionally blinking with a yellow light as a warning. As the power in the battery is drained so that robotic system 1 can no longer continue to provide robotic movement of the tools, all indicators 20 may blink red, thereby indicating a system fault. A wide variety of alternative signals may also be provided, some of which are indicated by the exemplary lexicographies of
Referring now to
Manipulator 32 is shown in more detail in
As different colors may be combined with different illumination levels and different modulation patterns in a signal, a very large number of independently identifiable signals can be generated, often being more than three separately identifiable signals, typically being more than 10 separately identifiable signals, and optionally of being more than 100 separately identifiable signals. Interpretation of the identifiable signals may be facilitated by a listing correlating signals and their meaning, such as that included as
So as to facilitate interpretation of the signals generated by indicators 20, any of a wide variety of signal conventions may be established and/or employed. For example, as can be understood with reference to
Referring now to
When the second system operator O2 desires the tool 5 attached to manipulator assembly B be replaced an alternate tool 5′, for example, tool F, the system operator may verbally instruct assistant A to mount tool F to his manipulator assembly. The indicator 20 of manipulator assembly B generates a signal in response to an appropriate input by the second system operator O2, clearly indicating to the assistant A which tool from which manipulator assembly is to be replaced.
As noted above, additional indicators may optionally be associated with each of the alternative tools 5′, thereby foregoing any need for verbal instruction to the assistant regarding which alternative tool is to be mounted to the manipulator. Toward that end, alternative tools 5′ may be included in a tool rack 62 which is coupled to processor 4, often so as to provide communication between the circuitry of alternative tools 5′ and the processor. This can allow the processor to read identifying information from the tools, thereby allowing the processor to determine which alternative tools or tool types are available and/or appropriate to mount on the manipulator system. An LED or other indicator may be associated with each alternative tool 5′ included in the tool rack, and processor 4 may transmit a signal to the tool rack so as to energize one or more indicator associated with one or more tools. Hence, when system operator O1 indicates to processor 4 a desire to replace a mounted tool 5 (for example, tool B on manipulator B) with a different type of tool, a list of available tools and/or tool types may be displayed to the system operator. In response to the system operator selecting (for example, a tool type corresponding to tool F, indicators 20 associated with tool B and tool F may be activated, indicating to the assistant A that these two tools should be exchanged.
Processor 4 will typically include data processing hardware and software, with the software typically comprising machine-readable code. The machine-readable code will embody software programming instructions to implement some or all of the methods described herein. While processor 4 is shown as a single block in the simplified schematic of
Referring now to
Regardless of whether the signal is initiated by a change in state or a system operator, the processor will typically transmit an appropriate command to one or more of the manipulator assemblies 76, and, in response, the indicator on that manipulator assembly will display a visual signal 78. Optionally, corresponding graphics may be shown in a system operator display 80, thereby allowing the system operator to maintain his or her concentration on the internal surgical site.
In response to the visual signal, the other person, such as an assistant, may optionally reconfigure the manipulator assembly 82. For example, the assistant may remove and replace a tool (with its end effector) or may manually reposition the manipulator linkage so as to move the end effector into a desired position. In some embodiments, the assistant may merely monitor the manipulator assembly in response to one or more visual signals, and may optionally prepare to take some appropriate action if the visual signal changes so as to indicate that such an action is appropriate.
While described in some detail, for clarity of understanding and by way of example, a variety of changes, adaptations, and modifications will be obvious to those of skill in the art. Hence, the scope of the present invention is limited solely by the appended claims.
Larkin, David Q., Mintz, David S., Walker, Theodore C., Hanuschik, Michael L.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11202683, | Feb 22 2019 | AURIS HEALTH, INC | Surgical platform with motorized arms for adjustable arm supports |
11304764, | Jun 30 2005 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Indicator for tool state and communication in multi-arm robotic telesurgery |
11337765, | Jun 30 2005 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Indicator for tool state and communication in multi-arm robotic telesurgery |
11432890, | Jan 04 2018 | Covidien LP | Systems and assemblies for mounting a surgical accessory to robotic surgical systems, and providing access therethrough |
11432891, | Jun 03 2015 | Covidien LP | Offset instrument drive unit |
11446099, | Jun 03 2016 | Covidien LP | Control arm for robotic surgical systems |
11464593, | Jun 03 2016 | Covidien LP | Passive axis system for robotic surgical systems |
11484372, | Feb 15 2019 | Covidien LP | Articulation mechanisms for surgical instruments such as for use in robotic surgical systems |
11504197, | Mar 31 2021 | Moon Surgical SAS | Co-manipulation surgical system having multiple operational modes for use with surgical instruments for performing laparoscopic surgery |
11510747, | May 25 2017 | Covidien LP | Robotic surgical systems and drapes for covering components of robotic surgical systems |
11517183, | Oct 23 2015 | Covidien LP | Surgical system for detecting gradual changes in perfusion |
11523509, | May 26 2016 | Covidien LP | Instrument drive units |
11529203, | Sep 25 2015 | Covidien LP | Robotic surgical assemblies and instrument drive connectors thereof |
11547508, | May 26 2016 | Covidien LP | Robotic surgical assemblies |
11553974, | May 25 2017 | Covidien LP | Systems and methods for detection of objects within a field of view of an image capture device |
11553984, | Jun 03 2016 | Covidien LP | Robotic surgical system with an embedded imager |
11576562, | Apr 07 2016 | Covidien LP | Camera positioning method and apparatus for capturing images during a medical procedure |
11576733, | Feb 06 2019 | Covidien LP | Robotic surgical assemblies including electrosurgical instruments having articulatable wrist assemblies |
11576739, | Jul 03 2018 | Covidien LP | Systems, methods, and computer-readable media for detecting image degradation during surgical procedures |
11583358, | Sep 06 2017 | Covidien LP | Boundary scaling of surgical robots |
11586106, | Dec 28 2018 | Covidien LP | Imaging apparatus having configurable stereoscopic perspective |
11596489, | Mar 10 2015 | Covidien LP | Measuring health of a connector member of a robotic surgical system |
11612446, | Jun 03 2016 | Covidien LP | Systems, methods, and computer-readable program products for controlling a robotically delivered manipulator |
11615884, | Mar 06 2018 | DIGITAL SURGERY LIMITED | Techniques for virtualized tool interaction |
11618171, | Dec 11 2013 | Covidien LP | Wrist and jaw assemblies for robotic surgical systems |
11622824, | Jun 16 2015 | Covidien LP | Robotic surgical system torque transduction sensing |
11622826, | Mar 31 2021 | Moon Surgical SAS | Co-manipulation surgical system for use with surgical instruments for performing laparoscopic surgery while compensating for external forces |
11628022, | Sep 05 2017 | Covidien LP | Collision handling algorithms for robotic surgical systems |
11628024, | Mar 08 2018 | Covidien LP | Surgical robotic systems |
11633243, | Oct 10 2018 | Covidien LP | Instrument insertion system, method, and apparatus for performing medical procedures |
11647888, | Apr 20 2018 | Covidien LP | Compensation for observer movement in robotic surgical systems having stereoscopic displays |
11666395, | Jun 23 2015 | Covidien LP | Robotic surgical assemblies |
11690691, | Feb 15 2017 | MEDTRONIC GMBH, EARL-BAKKEN-PLATZ | System and apparatus for crush prevention for medical robot applications |
11717355, | Jan 29 2019 | Covidien LP | Drive mechanisms for surgical instruments such as for use in robotic surgical systems |
11717361, | May 24 2017 | Covidien LP | Electrosurgical robotic system having tool presence detection |
11723735, | Jun 30 2005 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Indicator for tool state and communication in multi-arm robotic telesurgery |
11737840, | Mar 31 2021 | Moon Surgical SAS | Co-manipulation surgical system having a robot arm removeably attachable to surgical instruments for performing laparoscopic surgery |
11779413, | Nov 19 2015 | Covidien LP | Optical force sensor for robotic surgical system |
11786323, | Mar 31 2021 | Moon Surgical SAS | Self-calibrating co-manipulation surgical system for use with surgical instrument for performing laparoscopic surgery |
11806096, | Dec 04 2018 | MAKO SURGICAL CORP | Mounting system with sterile barrier assembly for use in coupling surgical components |
11812938, | Mar 31 2021 | Moon Surgical SAS | Co-manipulation surgical system having a coupling mechanism removeably attachable to surgical instruments |
11819302, | Mar 31 2021 | Moon Surgical SAS | Co-manipulation surgical system having user guided stage control |
11832909, | Mar 31 2021 | Moon Surgical SAS | Co-manipulation surgical system having actuatable setup joints |
11832910, | Jan 09 2023 | Moon Surgical SAS | Co-manipulation surgical system having adaptive gravity compensation |
11839441, | May 25 2017 | Covidien LP | Robotic surgical system with automated guidance |
11839442, | Jan 09 2023 | Moon Surgical SAS | Co-manipulation surgical system for use with surgical instruments for performing laparoscopic surgery while estimating hold force |
11844583, | Mar 31 2021 | Moon Surgical SAS | Co-manipulation surgical system having an instrument centering mode for automatic scope movements |
D963851, | Jul 10 2020 | Covidien LP | Port apparatus |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4281447, | Mar 01 1979 | McDonnell Douglas Corporation | Detachable tool interface system for a robot |
4332066, | Jan 07 1980 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Compliance mechanism |
4486928, | Jul 09 1981 | Magnavox Electronic Systems Company | Apparatus for tool storage and selection |
4500065, | Mar 01 1982 | ABB ROBOTICS, INC , A NY CORP | Releasable tool mount for manipulator |
4512709, | Jul 25 1983 | ABB ROBOTICS, INC , A NY CORP | Robot toolchanger system |
4706372, | Jun 11 1985 | Brown & Sharpe Dea SpA | Device for effecting automatic exchange of measuring tools in a measuring robot or machine |
4710093, | Jun 08 1984 | Kuka Schweissanlagen & Roboter GmbH | Device for the automatic gripping and releasing of a tool holder in a manipulator |
4793053, | Apr 16 1987 | General Motors Corporation; GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, A CORP OF DE | Quick disconnect device |
4809747, | Jul 31 1987 | General Motors Corporation | Quick disconnect device |
4830569, | Mar 31 1987 | Asea Brown Boveri AB | Industrial robot having a detachable electrical connection between housing on robot arm and tool holder |
4832198, | Jun 15 1987 | Container for packaging and counting surgical sponges | |
4943939, | Aug 29 1988 | Surgical instrument accounting apparatus and method | |
4979949, | Apr 26 1988 | The Board of Regents of The University of Washington | Robot-aided system for surgery |
4996975, | Jun 01 1989 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Electronic endoscope apparatus capable of warning lifetime of electronic scope |
5018266, | Dec 07 1987 | Megamation Incorporated | Novel means for mounting a tool to a robot arm |
5078140, | May 08 1986 | Imaging device - aided robotic stereotaxis system | |
5143453, | Oct 04 1988 | G.I.R. | Temperature monitoring device containing at least one element of an alloy which memorizes its shape |
5154717, | Apr 26 1988 | The Board of Regents of The University of Washington | Robot-aided system for surgery |
5174300, | Apr 04 1991 | Symbiosis Corporation | Endoscopic surgical instruments having rotatable end effectors |
5217003, | Mar 18 1991 | Wilk Patent Development Corporation | Automated surgical system and apparatus |
5221283, | May 15 1992 | General Electric Company | Apparatus and method for stereotactic surgery |
5236432, | Apr 26 1988 | Board of Regents of the University of Washington | Robot-aided system for surgery |
5255429, | Apr 09 1991 | MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO , LTD | Component mounting apparatus |
5257998, | Sep 20 1989 | Mitaka Kohki Co., Ltd.; Takaaki, Takizawa | Medical three-dimensional locating apparatus |
5271384, | Sep 01 1989 | Tyco Healthcare Group LP | Powered surgical retractor |
5294209, | Jul 25 1991 | Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha | Tool attaching device |
5305203, | Feb 01 1988 | XENON RESEARCH, INC | Computer-aided surgery apparatus |
5312212, | Sep 28 1992 | HOLDEN AMERICA INC ; 4077776 CANADA INC | Axially compliant tool holder |
5313935, | Dec 31 1992 | Symbiosis Corporation | Apparatus for counting the number of times a surgical instrument has been used |
5343385, | Aug 17 1993 | International Business Machines Corporation | Interference-free insertion of a solid body into a cavity |
5354314, | Dec 23 1988 | MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION AND DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION MIDCO | Three-dimensional beam localization apparatus and microscope for stereotactic diagnoses or surgery mounted on robotic type arm |
5355743, | Dec 19 1991 | Board of Regents, The University of Texas System | Robot and robot actuator module therefor |
5359993, | Dec 31 1992 | Symbiosis Corporation | Apparatus for counting the number of times a medical instrument has been used |
5372147, | Jun 16 1992 | TYCO HEALTHCARE GROUP AG; Covidien AG | Peritoneal distension robotic arm |
5397323, | Oct 30 1992 | International Business Machines Corporation | Remote center-of-motion robot for surgery |
5399951, | May 12 1992 | UNIVERSITE JOSEPH FOURIER | Robot for guiding movements and control method thereof |
5400267, | Dec 08 1992 | Hemostatix Corporation | Local in-device memory feature for electrically powered medical equipment |
5402801, | Nov 02 1993 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for augmentation of surgery |
5403319, | Apr 26 1988 | Board of Regents of the University of Washington | Bone imobilization device |
5417210, | May 27 1992 | INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION A CORP OF NEW YORK | System and method for augmentation of endoscopic surgery |
5427097, | Dec 10 1992 | PACIFIC REPUBLIC CAPITAL CORP | Apparatus for and method of carrying out stereotaxic radiosurgery and radiotherapy |
5451368, | Feb 25 1987 | Ethicon, Inc | Process and apparatus for dry sterilization of medical devices and materials |
5649956, | Jun 07 1995 | SRI International | System and method for releasably holding a surgical instrument |
5697939, | Aug 20 1992 | Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. | Apparatus for holding a medical instrument in place |
5762458, | Feb 20 1996 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Method and apparatus for performing minimally invasive cardiac procedures |
5784542, | Sep 07 1995 | ALBERTO RICARDO CUETO, TRUSTEE OF THE GUILLERMO RODRIGUEZ REVOCABLE TRUST - 2005 | Decoupled six degree-of-freedom teleoperated robot system |
5792135, | May 16 1997 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Articulated surgical instrument for performing minimally invasive surgery with enhanced dexterity and sensitivity |
5800423, | May 14 1993 | SRI International | Remote center positioner with channel shaped linkage element |
6071281, | May 05 1998 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc | Surgical method and apparatus for positioning a diagnostic or therapeutic element within the body and remote power control unit for use with same |
6132368, | Dec 12 1996 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Multi-component telepresence system and method |
6223100, | Jan 21 1992 | SRI, International | Apparatus and method for performing computer enhanced surgery with articulated instrument |
6246200, | Aug 04 1998 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Manipulator positioning linkage for robotic surgery |
6331181, | Dec 08 1998 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Surgical robotic tools, data architecture, and use |
6522906, | Dec 08 1998 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Devices and methods for presenting and regulating auxiliary information on an image display of a telesurgical system to assist an operator in performing a surgical procedure |
6574355, | Jan 21 1992 | Intuitive Surigical, Inc. | Method and apparatus for transforming coordinate systems in a telemanipulation system |
6659939, | Nov 20 1998 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Cooperative minimally invasive telesurgical system |
6731988, | Jan 21 1992 | SRI International | System and method for remote endoscopic surgery |
7024750, | Dec 20 2000 | Outokumpu Oyj | Method for the manufacture of layered metal product slabs and layered metal product slabs |
7048745, | Dec 08 1998 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Surgical robotic tools, data architecture, and use |
7107090, | Dec 08 1998 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Devices and methods for presenting and regulating auxiliary information on an image display of a telesurgical system to assist an operator in performing a surgical procedure |
7525274, | Mar 28 2003 | KUKA Roboter GmbH | Method and device for controlling a plurality of manipulators |
7643862, | Sep 15 2005 | Biomet Manufacturing, LLC | Virtual mouse for use in surgical navigation |
7666191, | Dec 12 1996 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Robotic surgical system with sterile surgical adaptor |
7699855, | Dec 12 1996 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Sterile surgical adaptor |
7727244, | Nov 21 1997 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Sterile surgical drape |
7763015, | Jan 24 2005 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Modular manipulator support for robotic surgery |
7896815, | Mar 01 2005 | CHECKPOINT SURGICAL, INC | Systems and methods for intra-operative stimulation |
7955322, | Dec 20 2005 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Wireless communication in a robotic surgical system |
8100133, | Jun 30 2005 | INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATION, INC | Indicator for tool state and communication in multi-arm robotic telesurgery and method of use |
8182470, | Dec 20 2005 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Telescoping insertion axis of a robotic surgical system |
8273076, | Jun 28 2005 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Indicator for tool state and communication in multi-arm robotic telesurgery |
8527094, | Nov 20 1998 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc | Multi-user medical robotic system for collaboration or training in minimally invasive surgical procedures |
8894634, | Jun 30 2005 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Indicator for tool state and communication in multi-arm robotic telesurgery |
9259276, | Jun 30 2005 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Indicator for tool state and communication in multiarm telesurgery |
20030109780, | |||
20040106916, | |||
20040267254, | |||
20050200324, | |||
20060052684, | |||
20060178559, | |||
20070142969, | |||
20120059390, | |||
20150073437, | |||
EP1462895, | |||
GB2350696, | |||
JP2003339736, | |||
JP2005536314, | |||
JP7024750, | |||
JP7194610, | |||
WO3094768, | |||
WO2007005555, | |||
WO9313916, | |||
WO9426167, | |||
WO9516396, | |||
WO9530964, | |||
WO9639944, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 01 2016 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 04 2022 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 16 2022 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 16 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 16 2023 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 16 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 16 2026 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 16 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 16 2027 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 16 2029 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 16 2030 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 16 2030 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 16 2031 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 16 2033 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |