A complex building agent, such as edta is added in a predetermined concentration to the "SC 1" step of a "PIRANHA-RCA" cleaning sequence for reducing the metal contamination left on the surface of a silicon wafer after completion of this cleaning step.

Patent
   5637151
Priority
Jun 27 1994
Filed
Jun 27 1994
Issued
Jun 10 1997
Expiry
Jun 27 2014
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
49
9
EXPIRED
7. A modified cleaning solution for improving the "SC 1" cleaning step of an "RCA-clean" sequence for silicon wafers, the modified cleaning solution comprising a modified "SC 1" cleaning formulation comprising nh4 OH, H2 O2, water, and a complex building agent comprising of edta for keeping metal complexes bound in solution during the "SC 1" step of cleaning said silicon wafers, thereby substantially reducing metal contamination of surfaces of said silicon wafers, and wherein the modified "SC 1" solution comprises a concentration of edta ranging from about 0.05 mg/l to about 0.10 mg/l.
10. A modified cleaning solution for improving the "SC 1" cleaning step of an "RCA-clean" sequence for silicon wafers, the modified cleaning solution comprising a modified "SC 1" cleaning formulation comprising nh4 OH, H2 O2, water, and a complex building agent comprising amine substituted phosphates for keeping metal complexes bound in solution during the "SC 1" step of cleaning said silicon wafers, thereby substantially reducing metal contamination of surfaces of said silicon wafers, and wherein the modified "SC 1" solution comprises a concentration of amine substituted phosphates ranging from about 0.10 mg/l to about 0.30 mg/l.
1. A method for reducing the metal contamination on the surface of a silicon wafer during an "RCA-clean" cleaning sequence performed on said silicon wafer in fabricating semiconductor devices therefrom, the improvement comprising:
adding a complex building agent comprising of edta to a chemical solution containing nh4 OH, H2 O2, and H2 provided for use in an "SC 1" cleaning step of said "RCA-clean", for providing a modified "SC 1" cleaning solution for keeping metal complexes bound in solution to substantially prevent the metal complexes from being retained on the surface of said silicon wafer, wherein the modified "SC 1" cleaning solution comprises a concentration of edta ranging from about 0.05 mg/l to about 0.10 mg/l;
retaining said modified "SC 1" cleaning solution in a tank tool; and
submerging said silicon wafer in said modified "SC 1" cleaning solution, for a selected period of time during an "SC 1" step of said improved "RCA-clean".
4. A method for reducing the metal contamination on the surface of a silicon wafer during an "RCA-clean" cleaning sequence performed on said silicon wafer in fabricating semiconductor devices therefrom, the improvement comprising:
adding from a complex building agent comprising amine substituted phosphates to a chemical solution containing nh4 OH, H2 O2, and H2 O provided for use in an "SC 1" cleaning step of said "RCA-clean", for providing a modified "SC 1" cleaning solution for keeping metal complexes bound in solution to substantially prevent the metal complexes from being retained on the surface of said silicon wafer, wherein the modified "SC 1" cleaning solution comprises a concentration of amine substituted phosphates ranging from about 0.10 mg/l to about 0.30 mg/l
retaining said modified "SC 1" cleaning solution in a tank tool; and
submerging said silicon wafer in said modified "SC 1" cleaning solution, for a selected period of time during an "SC 1" step of said improved "RCA-clean".
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the concentration of edta is about 0.10 mg/l, for addition to an "SC 1" original formula containing about 4% by weight of nh4 OH, and about 5% by weight of H2 O2.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the concentration of edta is about 0.05 mg/l, for addition to an "SC 1" dilute formula containing about 0.004% by weight of nh4 OH, and about 0.003% by weight of H2 O2.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the concentration of said amine substituted phosphates is about 0.30 mg/l for addition to an "SC 1" original formula containing about 4% by weight of nh4 OH, and about 5% by weight of H2 O2.
6. The method of claim 4, wherein the concentration of said amine substituted phosphates is about 0.10 mg/l, for addition to an "SC 1" dilute formula containing about 0.004% by weight of nh4 OH, and about 0.003% by weight of H2 O2.
8. The modified "SC 1" cleaning solution of claim 7, wherein the concentration of edta is about 0.10 mg/l, for an "SC 1" original formula containing about 4% by weight of nh4 OH, and about 5% by weight of H2 O2.
9. The modified "SC 1" cleaning solution of claim 7, wherein the concentration of edta is about 0.05 mg/l, for an "SC 1" dilute formula containing about 0.004% by weight of nh4 OH, and about 0.003% by weight of H2 O2.
11. The modified "SC 1" cleaning solution of claim 10, wherein the concentration of amine substituted phosphates is about 0.03 mg/l for an "SC 1" original formula containing about 4% by weight of nh4 OH, and about 5% by weight of H2 O2.
12. The modified "SC 1" cleaning solution of claim 10, wherein the concentration of amine substituted phosphates is about 0.10 mg/l for an "SC 1" dilute formula comprising about 0.004% by weight of nh4 OH, and about 0.003% by weight of H2 O2.
13. The modified "SC 1" cleaning solution of claim 7, wherein said complex building agent comprises a concentration of edta ranging from about 0.05 mg/l to about 0.10 mg/l for concentrations of nh4 OH ranging from about 0.004% by weight to about 4% by weight, respectively, and of H2 O2 ranging from about 0.003% by weight to about 5% by weight, respectively.
14. The modified "SC 1" cleaning solution of claim 10, wherein said complex building agent comprises a concentration of amine substituted phosphates ranging from about 0.10 mg/l to about 0.30 mg/l, for concentrations of nh4 OH ranging from about 0.004% by weight to about 4% by weight, respectively, and of H2 O2 ranging from about 0.003% by weight to about 5% by weight, respectively.

The present invention relates generally to the fabrication of semiconductors, and more particularly to the cleaning of semiconductor or silicon wafers over the course of producing the ultimate semiconductor product, such as an integrated circuit, whereby the intermediary cleaning steps remove contaminates deposited upon the surface of the associated silicon wafers during prior processing steps.

Typically, in producing complex semiconductor products, such as integrated circuit devices, thousands of processing steps are required to obtain the resultant product. In order to enhance profitability, it is important that the yield or numbers of useful integrated circuit devices obtained from a single silicon wafer during processing be maximized. Accordingly, semiconductor manufacturers go to great lengths to provide the greatest yield during the manufacturing of the semiconductor devices. Such devices are typically manufactured under clean room conditions in order to substantially eliminate any airborne contaminates from reaching the surface of the silicon wafers during processing, and reducing the yield. Also, during the actual processing of the silicon wafers, certain other processing steps may themselves cause contaminates to be deposited upon the wafer surface, making it necessary after predetermined processing steps have been completed, to clean the surface of the wafer before proceeding with subsequent processing or manufacturing steps, in order to ensure the highest possibly yield on the devices being produced.

A typical cleaning cycle during the manufacture of semiconductor products involves wet wafer cleaning, which usually involves a plurality of cleaning steps. Initial steps typically involve either spraying a mixture of chemicals and water onto the surface of the wafer, or immersing the wafer into such a mixture, followed by water rinse steps and drying steps, before the silicon wafer proceeds to further device processing. A cleaning sequence commonly known in the art as "RCA-clean" is often used in semiconductor manufacturing. One of the steps used in the "RCA-clean" is commonly known as the "SC 1" step, for removing particles from the surface of the silicon wafers being processed. However, the "SC 1" step tends to increase the metal contamination on the surface of the wafer, requiring that a subsequent cleaning step commonly known as "SC 2" be included to reduce the metal contamination from the prior "SC 1" step. Unfortunately, even with this additional "SC 2" step, it has been determined that the remaining metal concentration on the surface of the semiconductor silicon wafer is often not reduced to a low enough level, whereby the remaining metal concentration tends to reduce the yield of devices such as 64M DRAMs and 256M DRAMs, for example. Accordingly, semiconductor manufacturers are conducting ongoing research programs to find ways to further reduce the metal concentration remaining on the silicon wafers after cleaning sequences.

An object of the invention is to reduce the concentration of metal on the surface of a silicon wafer subsequent to a cleaning sequence during the fabrication of semiconductor devices there- from.

Another object of the invention is to improve the cleaning sequence known as "RCA-clean", for substantially reducing the metal contamination on the surface on the wafer cleaned in such a sequence.

With these and other objects in mind, and to overcome the problems in the prior art, the present inventor has developed an improved "RCA-clean" cleaning sequence for semiconductor manufacturing, wherein in the "SC 1" step of this sequence, a predetermined concentration of a complex building agent selected from the group including EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), or DEQUEST (phosphates with organic chains containing amines) is added to the wet clean mixture or formula of the "SC 1", for retaining metal complexes bound in the cleaning solution, thereby reducing the metal contamination of the surface of the silicon wafer being processing during the cleaning sequence.

Various embodiments of the present invention are described below with reference to the drawings, in which like items are identified by the same reference designation, and in which:

FIG. 1 shows a flowchart for a semiconductor manufacturing cleaning sequence commonly known as "RCA-clean".

FIG. 2 shows a flowchart for a semiconductor manufacturing cleaning sequence of one embodiment of the invention, that is an improvement of the "RCA-clean" of FIG. 1.

In semiconductor manufacturing, typically a silicon wafer is processed to chemically and physically change the wafer. Such processing may include steps for epitaxially growing layers of semiconductor material on a substrate provided by the base silicon wafer, etching portions of the wafer as it is being processed, doping portions of the wafer to have either n or p conductivity, and so forth. During the typically thousands of steps necessary to produce integrated circuit devices, for example, it is necessary at the end of a series of such steps to introduce a cleaning sequence. One such prior cleaning sequence is commonly known as the "RCA-clean", and as shown in FIG. 1 includes a plurality of steps "B" through "G". Typically in the prior art, an additional step, shown as step "A" or the "PIRANHA" step, is added to the "RCA-clean" steps "B" through "G", for providing a "PIRANHA-RCA" cleaning sequence as illustrated in FIG. 1. In the sequence of steps "A" through "G", in "A" or the "PIRANHA" organic contaminants are removed from the silicon wafers being cleaned; in step "C" or "SC 1" particles are removed from the silicon wafer; and in step "E" or "SC 2" metal contaminates are removed from the silicon wafers. Steps "B", "D", and "F" are water rinse steps, and step "G" is a wafer drying step.

It has recently been discovered in the prior art that substantially the same result can be obtained in cleaning silicon wafers using a "dilute chemistry for the RCA-clean steps" relative to the concentration used in the "original RCA-clean" formula. Table 1, as shown below, shows the chemicals and the concentrations for both the original and the dilute "PIRANHA-RCA" cleaning steps "A","C" and "E".

TABLE 1
__________________________________________________________________________
NAME OF THE CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION
PROCESS STEP
CHEMICAL
"ORIGINAL FORMULA"
"DILUTE FORMULA"
__________________________________________________________________________
Piranha H2 SO4
70% by weight 70% by weight
H2 O2
4% by weight 4% by weight
SC 1 NH4 OH
4% by weight 0.004-0.2%
H2 O2
5% by weight by weight
0.003-0.3%
by weight
SC 2 HCl 6% by weight 0.005-0.5%
H2 O2
5% by weight by weight
0.004-0.5%
by weight
__________________________________________________________________________

The chemical solution shown in table 1 can either be applied to a silicon wafer by use of a spray tool, whereby the solutions or mixtures are sprayed directly on the wafers, or the silicon wafers are submerged in a bath of the chemical mixture or solution contained within a tank tool. A commonly used spray tool is an "FSI MECURY OC". Also, commonly used tank tools include any one of a "Pokorny Wet Bench", "SMS Wet Bench", a "DNS Auto Cleaner", or a "Sankyo Auto Cleaner".

The present inventor recognized that the metal concentration left on surfaces of silicon wafers cleaned by the "Piranha-RCA" sequence of FIG. 1 often times remains higher than desired, causing a reduced yield during the manufacture of complex integrated circuit such as 64M DRAMs and 256M DRAMs, for example. The present inventor discovered that the metal contamination problem can be substantially reduced by modifying step "C" or the "SC 1" step of the "Piranha RCA" cleaning sequence of FIG. 1, by adding complex building agents selected from the group including EDTA or DEQUEST. In this manner, the metal complexes remain bound in solution, thereby preventing the associated metal from contaminating the surface of the silicon wafers being cleaned. As shown below in Table 2, the concentration of iron (Fe), nickel (Ni) and calcium (Ca), left on a silicon wafer surface after completing a Piranha-RCA cleaning sequence is substantially reduced in using the modified Piranha-RCA of FIG. 2., in comparison to the prior Piranha-RCA cleaning sequence of FIG. 1.

TABLE 2
______________________________________
CONCENTRATION
WITHOUT CONCENTRATION WITH
COMPLEX COMPLEX BUILDER
METAL BUILDER IN SC 1 IN SC 1
______________________________________
Fe 0.9-5 * 1010 atoms/cm2
<0.3 * 1010 atoms/cm2
Ni 0.5-1.7 * 1010 atoms/cm2
<0.5 * 1010 atoms/cm2
Ca 0.7-11 * 1010 atoms/cm2
<0.5 * 1010 atoms/cm2
______________________________________
*Values with "<" in front show results below detection limit

In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the present inventor discovered that a concentration of EDTA ranging between 0.05 mg/l and 0.10 mg/l in the modified step "C'" or "SC 1'" step of the modified cleaning sequence of FIG. 2 provide eptimum results. However, the EDTA concentration required is dependent upon the concentration of other chemicals used in the solution including whether the original or dilute chemistry "Piranha-RCA" is used. For example, it was discovered that optimum results are obtained in adding 0.10 mg/l EDTA to the "SC 1" step of the original "Piranha-RCA" clean formula. Also note that the cleaning sequence improvement of the present invention cannot be used in a spray tool. The reason is that the time between the mixing of the chemicals and the processing of the silicon wafers is too short to permit the chemical complex to form. Accordingly, the present improved process requires that a tank tool be used in cleaning the silicon wafers in step "C'" of FIG. 2.

Also, an automatic injector can be included in the cleaning system hardware for adding a predetermined quantity of the complex builder to the cleaning solution for the "SC 1'" step of the cleaning sequence of FIG. 2. Such automatic injectors are produced by the METROHM Company.

Although various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described above, they are not meant to be limiting. Certain modifications of these embodiments may occur to those of skill in the art, which modifications are meant to be covered by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Schulz, Peter

Patent Priority Assignee Title
5837662, Dec 12 1997 SUNEDISON SEMICONDUCTOR LIMITED UEN201334164H Post-lapping cleaning process for silicon wafers
5868856, Jul 23 1997 Texas Instruments Incorporated Method for removing inorganic contamination by chemical derivitization and extraction
5868862, Jul 31 1997 Texas Instruments Incorporated Method of removing inorganic contamination by chemical alteration and extraction in a supercritical fluid media
5970360, Dec 03 1996 CHANG LIAO HOLDINGS, LLC DRAM cell with a roughened poly-Si electrode
6146467, Aug 28 1998 Sumco Corporation Treatment method for semiconductor substrates
6162302, Nov 16 1999 Agilent Technologies Method of cleaning quartz substrates using conductive solutions
6211055, Aug 16 1999 ProMOS Technology, Inc.; Mosel Vitelic Inc.; Siemens AG Wet-dry-wet process in wet station
6230720, Aug 16 1999 Delaware Capital Formation, Inc Single-operation method of cleaning semiconductors after final polishing
6277753, Sep 28 1998 Tokyo Electron Limited Removal of CMP residue from semiconductors using supercritical carbon dioxide process
6299697, Aug 25 1999 SHIBAURA MECHATRONICS CORPORATION Method and apparatus for processing substrate
6306564, May 27 1997 Tokyo Electron Limited Removal of resist or residue from semiconductors using supercritical carbon dioxide
6331487, Sep 28 1998 Tokyo Electron Limited Removal of polishing residue from substrate using supercritical fluid process
6340395, Jan 18 2000 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Salsa clean process
6363950, Aug 25 1999 SHIBAURA MECHATRONICS CORPORATION Apparatus for processing substrate using process solutions having desired mixing ratios
6383723, Aug 28 1998 Micron Technology, Inc. Method to clean substrate and improve photoresist profile
6500605, May 27 1997 Tokyo Electron Limited Removal of photoresist and residue from substrate using supercritical carbon dioxide process
6509141, May 27 1997 Tokyo Electron Limited Removal of photoresist and photoresist residue from semiconductors using supercritical carbon dioxide process
6537381, Sep 29 1999 Lam Research Corporation Method for cleaning and treating a semiconductor wafer after chemical mechanical polishing
6537916, Sep 28 1998 Tokyo Electron Limited Removal of CMP residue from semiconductor substrate using supercritical carbon dioxide process
6736149, Nov 02 1999 Tokyo Electron Limited Method and apparatus for supercritical processing of multiple workpieces
6748960, Nov 02 1999 Tokyo Electron Limited Apparatus for supercritical processing of multiple workpieces
6871656, May 27 1997 Tokyo Electron Limited Removal of photoresist and photoresist residue from semiconductors using supercritical carbon dioxide process
6890853, Apr 25 2000 Tokyo Electron Limited Method of depositing metal film and metal deposition cluster tool including supercritical drying/cleaning module
6896744, May 22 2001 Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation Method for cleaning a surface of a substrate
6924086, Feb 15 2002 Tokyo Electron Limited Developing photoresist with supercritical fluid and developer
6926012, Nov 02 1999 Tokyo Electron Limited Method for supercritical processing of multiple workpieces
6928746, Feb 15 2002 TOKYO ELECTRONI LIMITED Drying resist with a solvent bath and supercritical CO2
7041562, Oct 29 2003 SHENZHEN XINGUODU TECHNOLOGY CO , LTD Method for forming multiple gate oxide thickness utilizing ashing and cleaning
7044662, Feb 15 2002 Tokyo Electron Limited Developing photoresist with supercritical fluid and developer
7060422, Nov 02 1999 Tokyo Electron Limited Method of supercritical processing of a workpiece
7064070, Sep 28 1998 Tokyo Electron Limited Removal of CMP and post-CMP residue from semiconductors using supercritical carbon dioxide process
7163380, Jul 29 2003 Tokyo Electron Limited Control of fluid flow in the processing of an object with a fluid
7169540, Apr 12 2002 Tokyo Electron Limited Method of treatment of porous dielectric films to reduce damage during cleaning
7208411, Apr 25 2000 Tokyo Electron Limited Method of depositing metal film and metal deposition cluster tool including supercritical drying/cleaning module
7250374, Jun 30 2004 Tokyo Electron Limited System and method for processing a substrate using supercritical carbon dioxide processing
7270941, Mar 04 2002 Tokyo Electron Limted Method of passivating of low dielectric materials in wafer processing
7291565, Feb 15 2005 Tokyo Electron Limited Method and system for treating a substrate with a high pressure fluid using fluorosilicic acid
7297638, Feb 21 2003 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO , LTD Method for manufacturing a semiconductor device
7307019, Sep 29 2004 Tokyo Electron Limited Method for supercritical carbon dioxide processing of fluoro-carbon films
7387868, Mar 04 2002 Tokyo Electron Limited Treatment of a dielectric layer using supercritical CO2
7399708, Mar 30 2005 Toyko Electron Limited Method of treating a composite spin-on glass/anti-reflective material prior to cleaning
7442636, Mar 30 2005 Tokyo Electron Limited Method of inhibiting copper corrosion during supercritical CO2 cleaning
7449127, Jun 26 2000 Applied Materials, Inc. Cleaning method and solution for cleaning a wafer in a single wafer process
7456113, Jun 06 2005 Applied Materials, Inc Cleaning method and solution for cleaning a wafer in a single wafer process
7469883, Jun 26 2000 Applied Materials, Inc. Cleaning method and solution for cleaning a wafer in a single wafer process
7491036, Nov 12 2004 Tokyo Electron Limited Method and system for cooling a pump
7550075, Mar 23 2005 Tokyo Electron Ltd Removal of contaminants from a fluid
7789971, May 13 2005 Tokyo Electron Limited Treatment of substrate using functionalizing agent in supercritical carbon dioxide
8551575, Sep 08 2008 Lam Research Methods and solutions for preventing the formation of metal particulate defect matter upon a substrate after a plating process
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4116714, Aug 15 1977 International Business Machines Corporation Post-polishing semiconductor surface cleaning process
4264374, Sep 25 1978 International Business Machines Corporation Cleaning process for p-type silicon surface
4885106, Jan 27 1987 Micro-Image Technology Limited Storable semiconductor cleaning solution containing permonosulphuric acid
4913823, Oct 14 1988 DIVERSEY CORPORATION, A CANADIAN CORP Process for dissolving and removing scale from aqueous systems
4963283, Jun 11 1988 Micro-Image Technology Limited Solutions of perhalogenated compounds
4985228, Jul 17 1990 E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company Purification of hydrogen peroxide
5051134, Jan 26 1990 Wacker-Chemitronic Gesellschaft fur Elektronik-Grundstoffe m.b.H. Process for the wet-chemical treatment of semiconductor surfaces
5213622, Oct 11 1991 VERSUM MATERIALS US, LLC Cleaning agents for fabricating integrated circuits and a process for using the same
5290361, Jan 24 1991 Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.; Purex Co., Ltd. Surface treating cleaning method
//
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jun 23 1994SCHULZ, PETERSIEMENS COMPONENTS, INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0070570133 pdf
Jun 27 1994Siemens Components, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Feb 04 2000ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Nov 21 2000M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Dec 02 2004M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Dec 15 2008REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Jun 10 2009EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Jun 10 20004 years fee payment window open
Dec 10 20006 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jun 10 2001patent expiry (for year 4)
Jun 10 20032 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Jun 10 20048 years fee payment window open
Dec 10 20046 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jun 10 2005patent expiry (for year 8)
Jun 10 20072 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Jun 10 200812 years fee payment window open
Dec 10 20086 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jun 10 2009patent expiry (for year 12)
Jun 10 20112 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)