A closed-loop focusing system and method positions a focusing assembly to a desired positioned. A feedback positioning device, such as a linear encoder, provides an actual or “read” value for the linear movement of the focusing assembly. The desired position is compared to the actual position of the focusing assembly. If the two values are outside of a predetermined tolerance or valid range, then an audible or visual warning will be given. When a laser source is utilized with the focusing system, laser operation will be prevented if the two values are outside of an acceptable range. However, if the difference between the desired position and the actual position are within an acceptable range, the focusing assembly is repositioned to allow real-time systematic correction of the position of the focusing assembly.

Patent
   7027233
Priority
Oct 12 2001
Filed
Apr 20 2004
Issued
Apr 11 2006
Expiry
Oct 12 2021
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
96
20
all paid
25. A method of positioning a focusing assembly for focusing a laser, said method comprising:
moving a focusing assembly to a desired position based on a desired position value;
determining an actual position value for the actual linear movement of said focusing assembly;
determining a delta value between said actual position value and said desired position value; and
repositioning said focusing assembly if said delta value is within a particular range.
46. A method of positioning a focusing assembly for focusing a laser, said method comprising:
moving a focusing assembly to a desired position based on a desired position value;
determining an actual position value for the actual linear movement of said focusing assembly;
determining a delta value between said actual position value and said desired position value; and
repositioning said focusing assembly if said delta value is within a particular range; and
providing a laser source for generating a laser beam to be directed through said moveable focusing assembly, wherein the laser source is an infrared, ultrashort pulse laser.
1. A closed-loop focal positioning system, said system comprising:
a focusing assembly for focusing a laser beam to a focal depth position;
a feedback positioning device for determining the position of said focusing assembly; and
a computer processor interconnected to said feedback positioning device, said processor adapted to instruct movement of said focusing assembly based on a value for a desired focal depth position, and said processor adapted to receive an actual position value of said focusing assembly from said feedback positioning device;
wherein said feedback positioning device is adapted to read the linear movement of the focusing assembly to obtain said actual position value, and said processor is adapted to compute a delta value between said actual position value and said desired position value, and said processor is adapted to reposition said focusing assembly if the delta value is within an acceptable range.
24. A closed-loop focal positioning system, said system comprising:
a focusing assembly for focusing a laser beam to a focal depth position;
a feedback positioning device for determining the position of said focusing assembly;
a computer processor interconnected to said feedback positioning device, said processor adapted to instruct movement of said focusing assembly based on a value for a desired focal depth position, and said processor adapted to receive an actual position value of said focusing assembly from said feedback positioning device; and
a laser source for generating a laser beam to be directed through said moveable focusing assembly, wherein said laser source is an infrared, ultrashort pulse laser with a pulse duration of less than 10 picoseconds;
wherein said feedback positioning device is adapted to read the linear movement of the focusing assembly to obtain said actual position value, and said processor is adapted to compute a delta value between said actual position value and said desired position value, and said processor is adapted to reposition said focusing assembly if the delta value is within an acceptable range.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the feedback positioning device is a linear encoder.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the feedback positioning device is a rotary encoder.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the feedback positioning device is an interferometric encoder.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the feedback positioning device is an optical encoder.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the feedback positioning device is a resolver.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the feedback positioning device is a Heidenheim scale.
8. The system of claim 1, wherein the feedback positioning device is an angular encoder.
9. The system of claim 1, wherein the feedback positioning device is a digital length gauge system.
10. The system of claim 1, wherein the feedback positioning device is a phase device.
11. The system of claim 1, wherein the feedback positioning device is a magnetic strip reader.
12. The system of claim 1, wherein the feedback positioning device is a transducer.
13. The system of claim 1, wherein the focusing assembly is a moveable zoom lens.
14. The system of claim 1, wherein the focusing assembly is a galvo-motorized focusing assembly.
15. The system of claim 1, further comprising a digital/analog converter for translating electronic signals from said computer processor to an analog voltage source for powering said moveable focusing assembly.
16. The system of claim 1, further comprising a laser source for generating a laser beam to be directed through said moveable focusing assembly.
17. The system of claim 16, wherein said processor is adapted to permit activation of the laser source if said delta value is within an acceptable range.
18. The system of claim 16, wherein said laser source is a continuous wave, Q-switched pulse, or mode-locked ultrashort pulse laser.
19. The system of claim 1, further comprising a visual display for providing a visual warning to an operator if the delta value is outside of said acceptable range.
20. The system of claim 1, further comprising an audio device for providing an audible warning to an operator when said delta value is outside of said acceptable range.
21. The system of claim 1, wherein said processor is adapted to prevent laser activation if said delta value is outside of an acceptable range.
22. The system of claim 1, wherein said processor is adapted to repeatedly reposition said focusing assembly during movement of the focusing assembly to said desired focal depth.
23. The system of claim 2, wherein said linear encoder comprises an encoder strip, a sensor head and interpolator-to-serial module.
26. The method of claim 25, wherein the step of moving a focusing assembly to a desired position based on a desired position value comprises:
receiving by a software program a desired focal depth for a laser beam;
converting the focal depth value to a position based value; and
directing said focusing assembly to move to said position based value.
27. The method of claim 26, further comprising the step of preventing activation of said laser beam if said delta value falls outside of an acceptable range.
28. The method of claim 25, wherein the step of determining an actual position value for the actual linear movement of said focusing assembly comprises:
utilizing a feedback positioning device to read an actual position of the focusing assembly.
29. The method of claim 28, wherein the feedback positioning device is a linear encoder.
30. The method of claim 28, wherein the feedback positioning device is a rotary encoder.
31. The method of claim 28, wherein the feedback positioning device is an interferometric encoder.
32. The method of claim 28, wherein the feedback positioning device is an optical encoder.
33. The method of claim 28, wherein the feedback positioning device is a resolver.
34. The method of claim 28, wherein the feedback positioning device is a Heidenheim scale.
35. The method of claim 28, wherein the feedback positioning device is an angular encoder.
36. The method of claim 28, wherein the feedback positioning device is a digital length gauge system.
37. The method of claim 28, wherein the feedback positioning device is a phase device.
38. The method of claim 28, wherein the feedback positioning device is a magnetic strip reader.
39. The method of claim 28, wherein the feedback positioning device is a transducer.
40. The method of claim 25, wherein the focusing assembly is a moveable zoom lens.
41. The method of claim 25, wherein the focusing assembly is a galvo-motorized focusing assembly.
42. The method of claim 25, further comprising the step of generating a current to a motor for movement of said focusing assembly.
43. The method of claim 25, further comprising the step of providing an audible and/or visual warning that the delta value falls outside of an acceptable range.
44. The method of claim 25, further comprising the step of preventing laser activation if said delta value falls outside of an acceptable range.
45. The method of claim 25, further comprising the step of providing a laser source for generating a laser beam to be directed through said moveable focusing assembly.

This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/976,555 filed on Oct. 12, 2001, no U.S. Pat. No. 6,751,033.

Various laser procedures or operations require that the laser beam be properly focused to a specific focal point. For example, in ophthalmic laser surgery wherein eye tissue is to be photodisrupted or ablated in or on the tissue that is to be affected, the correct positioning of a focusing assembly used to focus a laser beam is very critical. Such ophthalmic surgical procedures include those in cornea, sclera, iris, the crystalline lens and related structures, vitreous, and retina, and for treatment of glaucoma. Focal depth precision is also required in many non-ophthalmic laser surgical procedures, such as applications in dermatology and even “surgery” in DNA to excise portions of chromosomes. Also, non-biologic applications, such as photolithography and micromachining require focal depth precision.

Even with calibration of a focusing element for a laser, which is made to vary according to the requirement of the surgical treatment pattern, the actual focal depth of the laser beam may differ from the desired focal depth for the treatment. Hence, there is a need for a closed-loop system that controls movement of a focusing assembly to a desired position and feedback validation that the desired movement of the focusing assembly has been achieved. In this manner, the depth position of a focal point may be precisely controlled.

The present invention relates generally to a closed-loop focal positioning system. More particularly, the invention relates to a method and system for moving a focusing assembly for focusing a laser beam to a desired position (also referred to as the theoretical position) and then determining via a feedback positioning device, an actual movement value of the focusing assembly.

Briefly stated, the closed-loop focal positioning system utilizes a computer processor for the execution of software to control the movement of a focusing assembly used to focus a laser beam. The software is configured to allow an operator to identify a laser focal point or depth. In turn, the focusing assembly is instructed to move to a desired position. A feedback positioning device reads the actual position or movement of the focusing assembly. A comparison of the desired position and the actual position is used to determine if the focusing assembly has been correctly moved, thereby ensuring that the laser beam will be correctly focused when it is activated.

In one embodiment, the focusing assembly is repositioned if a delta value, the difference between the desired position and the actual position, are within an acceptable range. This allows systematic correction of the position of the focusing assembly. However, if the delta value falls outside of an acceptable range then the laser system focusing assembly should be recalibrated.

Various laser sources may be used with the inventive system and method, including infrared, visible, and UV lasers. Further, laser sources to be used with the inventive system may be continuous wave, Q-switched pulse, and mode-locked ultrashort pulse lasers. Although the following is not an exhaustive list, lasers of the foregoing type may be used with the present invention. In the preferred embodiment, the laser source is an infrared ultrashort pulse laser with a pulse duration of less than 10 picoseconds.

The focusing assembly may be a single lens, objective lens, compound lens, a lens assembly, curved mirror or series of curved and/or flat mirrors, a combination of the foregoing, or a moveable housing containing the foregoing, that is used to focus a laser beam where the movement of the focusing assembly can be measured and the movement correlated to a focal depth. In other words, the focusing assembly can be any laser focusing device in whole or in part that is moveable, and the movement of such device can be measured by a feedback positioning device to determine if an actual focal point is achieved.

In an embodiment of the inventive system, an operator of a laser system for ophthalmic surgery identifies a desired focal depth position value for photodisruption or ablation of a structure of the eye, such as the cornea or crystalline lens. A software program executing on a host computer receives the value for the laser focal depth position. The software program commands a displacement of a focusing assembly of a laser system by writing a voltage to a Digital/Analog card. A Z galvo will in turn move the focusing assembly to the desired focal depth position based upon the commanded voltage by directing a current to the motor-driven focusing assembly.

A linear encoder positioned within the laser system senses the linear movement of the focusing assembly. An intelligent controller interoperating with the host computer and software program utilizes a sensor to read an encoder strip attached to the focusing assembly. As the lens is moved into position, encoder feedback is provided by an intelligent controller and an actual focusing assembly position is obtained.

Although in one embodiment the feedback positioning device is a linear encoder, other feedback positioning devices may be used including a rotary encoder, an interferometric encoder, an optical encoder, a resolver, a Heidenheim scale, angular encoders, digital length gauge systems, phase device, magnetic strip reader, or transducer.

For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic view of the closed-loop focal positioning system illustrating an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2a is a schematic diagram view of a focusing assembly used with the present invention;

FIG. 2b is a schematic diagram of an exposed internal view of the focusing assembly of FIG. 2a;

FIG. 2c is a schematic diagram of an exposed internal view of the moveable zoom lens assembly of FIG. 2b;

FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a method of laser focusing depth validation;

FIG. 4 is a perspective view of an exemplary ophthalmic laser system in which the present inventive system may be implemented; and

FIG. 5 is a schematic view of an exemplary ophthalmic laser system in which the present inventive system may be implemented.

Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.

Closed-loop Focal Positioning System

FIG. 1 depicts a schematic view of one embodiment of the closed-loop focusing system according to the present invention. A computer 7 having a CPU 10 on a motherboard is interconnected to a digital to analog converter card 11 by way of a cable 19. The CPU 10 sends instructions to the digital/analog converter card 11 thereby providing a voltage from a power source 15 to a motor 14. The motor provides linear movement of the movable zoom lens assembly 26 (shown in a housing 17) via a drive shaft 18 housed in a drive shaft housing 13. Alternatively, a mirror or series of mirrors may be used as the movable element. A feedback positioning device 12, such as a linear encoder, utilizing a sensor 16, reads the movement of the focusing assembly 26. The feedback positioning device 12 is interconnected with the CPU 10. A monitor or screen 8 and a speaker 9 may be utilized to provide audible and/or visual warnings.

In one embodiment, the focusing assembly is part of a Z galvo motorized focusing system. A Z galvo is generally a limited excursion motor whose torque is directly proportional to the current applied. When current is applied to the motor, the galvo's shaft rotates through part of a circle. As long as the current is applied the shaft will remain rotated in correlation to the amount of current applied. When current is reduced, the shaft rotates toward its original position with the shaft returning to its resting position when current is removed. Based on the amount of current applied to the motor, the focal point of light through the focusing assembly is displaced. In another embodiment, the movable focusing assembly may be a curved mirror or a series of curved and/or flat mirrors whose position determines the laser focal depth position.

In one embodiment, a linear encoder, such as the MicroE Systems™ model (M2100L30SS200) product may be utilized as a feedback positioning device 12. The MicroE encoder product consists of an encoder strip (a glass strip with reflective gradient), a sensor head 16, and interpolator to serial module 12. The encoder is preferably configured for a resolution of 0.1 μm or less per count at a frequency of about 900 kHz or greater.

The CPU utilizes the linear encoder to accurately check the position of the zoom lens assembly and thereby control the focal position to within a few of microns of an absolute value. This is accomplished by knowing the galvo command voltage increments (linear voltage steps that produce linear galvo rotation). The galvo produces precise rotational motion of the lead screw that actuates the movement of the focusing assembly. An optical encoder gradient strip is attached to the focusing assembly. The encoder, therefore, accurately measures the movement of the focusing assembly. With knowledge of the encoder output (a number of counts per micron of movement) and the galvo voltage step command (the number of voltage steps per micron of movement) the system software can compare the two and determine if the condition is normal or out of range.

As further illustrated in FIGS. 2a2c, the sensor head 16 is affixed to the housing 17 where a window or opening in the housing 17 exists so that the sensor head 16 can read a gradient strip 25 affixed to the focusing assembly 26. As the focusing assembly 26 is moved or moves in a linear fashion the sensor head 16 reads the movement of the focusing assembly 26. The focusing assembly as depicted in the Figures is used to focus a laser beam 22 to a fixed focal point 23 in conjunction with other optical elements 27, 28 and 29.

A quadrature (A, B, and Index) to serial RS-232 converter, model #AD4-B-D-S1767 from U.S. Digital, may be utilized as a digital/analog converter card 11. The AD4-B board is preferably connected to a computer 7 motherboard via a nine pin cable 19 running at a standard 9600 baud.

The MicroE interpolator 12 and the U.S. Digital board 11 are mounted together as an assembly. Power is provided to the assembly via a DC plug that plugs into the U.S. digital board from the computer system power supply +12 VDC. The interpolator and AD4-B board are connected via cable 20. The quadrature signals are passed to the U.S. Digital board 11 from the MicroE interpolator via RS-422 (differential). Also power is provided to the MicroE board via a power cable. The MicroE sensor head 16 is attached to the housing 17 via a cable 21 from the interpolator 12. The encoder glass strip 25 is attached to the focusing assembly 26 with a UV cured adhesive.

The computer 7 controls positioning of the focusing assembly 26 and receives data pertaining to the position of the focusing lens assembly from the interpolator 12.

Software Control of the Closed-loop Focal Positioning System

In one embodiment of the inventive system, the focal position is computed and controlled via software instructions preferably executable via a CPU 10. The software instructions may be contained on storage media such as CDs, hard drives, diskettes, or other electronic storage media devices. Additionally, the computer software (instruction sets) may be stored in ROM, RAM or other storage devices capable of storage computer instructions. The software program may be configured to provide various control of the focusing assembly 26. Functions performed by the software may include: Initialization of the System, Calibration of the System, Movement of the Focusing Assembly, Automatic Repositioning of the Focusing Assembly, and Determination that the Focusing Assembly is at a Desired Position. Based on this disclosure other functions would be readily ascertainable to one skilled in the art.

Initialization of the System. An initialization and error checking process is performed to determine whether individual components of the system are operable. A status or response is requested from the component devices .such the focusing assembly (e.g., the Z galvo objective lens), the analog-to-digital converter, linear encoder and the communication ports. Should any of these devices respond with an error code or not respond at all then the software will indicate such an error.

Calibration of the System. The software checks the linear encoder index affixed to the focusing assembly. In one embodiment, a Z galvo is commanded to move through its upper and lower limits and a zero position is established. The Z galvo is then parked or stopped at a zero position. Additionally, the software. calibrates the Z galvo. by submitting a signal to a digital to analog converter, which in turn provides positive and negative voltage signals to the Z galvo. After the Z galvo is instructed to move a reading is taken from the encoder index.

Movement of the Focusing Assembly. After calibration of the Z galvo, positioning commands are made to move the, Z galvo to the desired position. Initially, the Z galvo begins at a zero position. The Z galvo focusing assembly is commanded to move to desired positions. With the linear encoder, the actual position of the focusing assembly is then determined.

Determination that the Focusing Assembly is at a Desired Position. Once the Z galvo is moved to a desired position, the actual position of the Z galvo is determined. An encoder sensor reads the encoder index through a housing window.

The software program compares the actual focusing assembly position to the desired focal depth position. The software determines whether the desired focal depth position is within a certain range. If the actual focusing assembly position and the desired focal depth position are within range, then the software will allow the laser treatment of the eye to continue. If the actual focusing assembly position is out of range, then the software will prevent laser treatment from commencing.

An acceptable range may be configured according to the particular uses of the focusing system. In the context of ophthalmic surgery, the differences between the desired position and the actual position should be typically 5 microns or less. This assures that the positioning of the lens and subsequent treatment of the eye structure will be extremely accurate. For example, an acceptable range can be set as follows:

In the closed-loop focusing system of the present invention, movement of the lens may achieved in number of ways, including, but not limited to, the following:

1. A computer processor may instruct a motorized focusing assembly to linearly move the assembly to a desired position from a base position. The processor interconnected with a digital-to-analog converter provides a voltage source to the motorized lens thereby moving the lens to the desired position. A feedback positioning device then determines the actual position of the lens.

2. Additionally, the computer processor may instruct movement of the focusing assembly when the focusing assembly is not positioned at its base position. For example, the computer processor may have previously moved the focusing assembly to a desired position. The focusing assembly would be moved to the new position without having to return to the base position. The value of the current position and the new desired position are used to calculate how much the focusing assembly should be positioned.

3. The focusing assembly may also be commanded to move by specific increments by the operator of the system. For example, the assembly may be commanded to move up or down by specific increments, such as microns.

Automatic Repositioning of the Focusing Assembly. A delta value can be computed as the absolute difference between the desired position value and the actual position value. The delta value can then be compared to an acceptable range of variance between the desired position and the actual: position. If the delta value is slight, say about plus or minus 2 microns, then the focusing assembly would not be repositioned. However, if a greater delta value exists, say between >2 microns to <25 microns, then the focusing assembly would be slightly repositioned so that the difference between the desired positioned and actual position is plus or minus 2 microns. If the variance is greater than 25 microns, than the focusing assembly should be recalibrated. The accuracy needed for repositioning the focusing assembly would depend on the particular application. The system may be configured such that the repositioning of the focusing assembly is completed at the end of each instructed movement. Alternatively, during the movement of the focusing assembly the feedback positioning device can monitor an actual position and compare it with the position where the system estimates the position of the focusing assembly. In this manner, corrective action can be taken immediately and the focusing assembly repositioned real-time if the delta value falls outside of an acceptable range.

Exemplary Implementation of the Closed-loop Focal Positioning System

Referring to FIG. 4, a perspective view of an exemplary ophthalmic laser system in which the present inventive system may be implemented is shown. A user interface and terminal 31 provides for data input into a CPU (not shown) of desired focal values. The exemplary ophthalmic laser system includes an emergency shut off switch 32, disk drive 33, key switch 34, beam delivery device 35, operating microscope 36, control panel 37, and a loading deck for interface to an eye-stabilizing device.

Referring to FIG. 5, a schematic view of the exemplary ophthalmic laser system of FIG. 4 is shown. A laser source 41 is directed through a beam delivery device into a z-scanning objective lens 43. A display 42 is provided for viewing the eye undergoing laser treatment. The display may provide visual warning to the operator of the system when the focusing assembly falls outside of an acceptable range.

The inventive systems and methods described above are well adapted for a closed-loop focal positioning system. However, it shall be noted that the foregoing description is presented for purposes of illustration and description, and is not intended to limit the invention to the form disclosed herein. Consequently, variations and modifications to the systems and processes commensurate with the above teachings and teaching of the relevant art are within the scope of the invention. For example, as mentioned previously, several aspects of the invention may be adapted for application or implementation onto an interactive computer network or client-server system other than the Internet. These variations will readily suggest themselves to those skilled in the relevant art and are encompassed within the spirit of the invention and the scope of the following claims.

Moreover, the embodiments described are further intended to explain the best modes for practicing the invention, and to enable others skilled in the art to utilize the invention in such, or other, embodiments and with various modifications required by the particular applications or uses of the present invention. It is intended that the appending claims be construed to included alternative embodiments to the extent that it is permitted by the prior art.

Goldstein, Peter, Juhasz, Tibor, Suarez, Carlos G., DeLong, Scott A., Webb, R. K.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10034795, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Intraocular lens
10130510, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser ophthalmic surgery
10182943, Mar 09 2012 Alcon Inc Adjustable pupil system for surgical laser systems
10195017, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method for creating incision to improve intraocular lens placement
10376356, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method and apparatus for creating ocular surgical and relaxing incisions
10405970, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method and apparatus for creating ocular surgical and relaxing incisions
10548715, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Apparatus for creating incisions to improve intraocular lens placement
10548716, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method for creating incision to improve intraocular lens placement
10639140, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method for patterned plasma-mediated modification of the crystalline lens
10709548, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method and apparatus for creating ocular surgical and relaxing incisions
10729538, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method for patterned plasma-mediated modification of the crystalline lens
10736733, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Intraocular lens
10828149, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method for patterned plasma-mediated modification of the crystalline lens
10874553, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser ophthalmic surgery
10925720, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method and apparatus for creating ocular surgical and relaxing incisions
11026838, Jan 09 2008 Alcon Inc Photodisruptive laser fragmentation of tissue
11364147, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser ophthalmic surgery
11382794, Jul 02 2018 BELKIN VISION LTD Direct selective laser trabeculoplasty
11564836, May 10 2010 Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.; Tel Hashomer Medical Research Infrastructure and Services Ltd. System and method for treating an eye
11612478, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Apparatus for creating incisions to improve intraocular lens placement
11654015, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Intraocular lens
11701221, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Intraocular lens
11759310, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method for creating incision to improve intraocular lens placement
11771596, May 10 2010 Ramot at Tel-Aviv University Ltd.; Tel Hashomer Medical Research Infrastructure and Services Ltd. System and method for treating an eye
11826245, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method for patterned plasma-mediated modification of the crystalline lens
11839536, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method for patterned plasma-mediated modification of the crystalline lens
8005947, Sep 22 2008 JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC Systems and methods for providing remote diagnostics and support for surgical systems
8182471, Mar 17 2006 AMO Manufacturing USA, LLC Intrastromal refractive correction systems and methods
8182472, Mar 17 2006 AMO Manufacturing USA, LLC. Intrastromal refractive correction systems and methods
8262647, Jul 29 2009 Alcon Inc Optical system for ophthalmic surgical laser
8265364, Feb 05 2010 Alcon Inc Gradient search integrated with local imaging in laser surgical systems
8267925, Jul 29 2009 Alcon Inc Optical system for ophthalmic surgical laser
8394084, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser trephination of the lens capsule and three dimensional phaco-segmentation
8398236, Jun 14 2010 Alcon Inc Image-guided docking for ophthalmic surgical systems
8398238, Aug 26 2011 Alcon Inc Imaging-based guidance system for ophthalmic docking using a location-orientation analysis
8403921, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Method and apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser trephination of the lens capsule and three dimensional phaco-segmentation
8414564, Feb 18 2010 Alcon Inc Optical coherence tomographic system for ophthalmic surgery
8419721, Jul 29 2009 Alcon Inc Optical system for ophthalmic surgical laser
8425497, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Method and apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser trephination of the lens capsule and three dimensional phaco-segmentation
8459794, May 02 2011 Alcon Inc Image-processor-controlled misalignment-reduction for ophthalmic systems
8500724, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Method and apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser trephination of the lens capsule and three dimensional phaco-segmentation
8500725, Jul 29 2009 Alcon Inc Optical system for ophthalmic surgical laser
8506559, Nov 16 2009 Alcon Inc Variable stage optical system for ophthalmic surgical laser
8518026, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Apparatus for creating incisions to improve intraocular lens placement
8657810, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method for creating incisions to improve intraocular lens placement
8679100, Jul 29 2009 Alcon Inc Optical system with multiple scanners for ophthalmic surgical laser
8690862, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser trephination of the lens capsule and three dimensional phaco-segmentation
8709001, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Method and apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser trephination of the lens capsule and three dimensional phaco-segmentation
8764736, Sep 05 2007 Alcon Inc Laser-induced protection shield in laser surgery
8764737, Sep 06 2007 Alcon Inc Precise targeting of surgical photodisruption
8852177, Mar 09 2012 Alcon Inc Spatio-temporal beam modulator for surgical laser systems
8920407, Jul 29 2009 Alcon Inc Optical system for ophthalmic surgical laser
8968375, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method for patterned plasma-mediated modification of the crystalline lens
9023016, Dec 19 2011 Alcon Inc Image processor for intra-surgical optical coherence tomographic imaging of laser cataract procedures
9044303, Sep 06 2007 Alcon Inc Precise targeting of surgical photodisruption
9066784, Dec 19 2011 Alcon Inc Intra-surgical optical coherence tomographic imaging of cataract procedures
9095415, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Method and apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser trephination of the lens capsule and three dimensional phaco-segmentation
9101446, Jan 02 2008 INTRALASE CORP System and method for scanning a pulsed laser beam
9101448, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Method and apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser trephination of the lens capsule and three dimensional phaco-segmentation
9107732, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Method and apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser trephination of the lens capsule and three dimensional phaco-segmentation
9108270, Jan 02 2008 AMO Development, LLC System and method for scanning a pulsed laser beam
9119703, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Method and apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser trephination of the lens capsule and three dimensional phaco-segmentation
9119704, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Method and apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser trephination of the lens capsule and three dimensional phaco-segmentation
9125725, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Method and apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser trephination of the lens capsule and three dimensional phaco-segmentation
9138349, Dec 10 2010 Alcon Inc Laser device, in particular, for ophthalmological laser surgery
9138351, Jan 02 2008 AMO Development, LLC Method for scanning a pulsed laser beam
9226853, Jan 02 2008 AMO Development, LLC Method for scanning a pulsed laser beam
9233023, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method and apparatus for creating ocular surgical and relaxing incisions
9233024, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method and apparatus for creating ocular surgical and relaxing incisions
9271870, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser ophthalmic surgery
9364317, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method for creating incisions to improve intraocular lens placement
9393155, Dec 28 2011 Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH System and method for postoperative capsular bag control
9402715, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method for patterned plasma-mediated modification of the crystalline lens
9408749, Sep 06 2007 Alcon Inc Precise targeting of surgical photodisruption
9427356, Jan 09 2008 Alcon Inc Photodisruptive laser fragmentation of tissue
9456925, Sep 06 2007 Alcon Inc Photodisruptive laser treatment of the crystalline lens
9456926, Dec 19 2011 Alcon Inc Intra-surgical optical coherence tomographic imaging of cataract procedures
9456927, Dec 19 2011 Alcon Inc Image processor for intra-surgical optical coherence tomographic imaging of laser cataract procedures
9474648, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser ophthalmic surgery
9474649, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser ophthalmic surgery
9480601, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser ophthalmic surgery
9492322, Nov 16 2009 Alcon Inc Imaging surgical target tissue by nonlinear scanning
9504608, Jul 29 2009 Alcon Inc Optical system with movable lens for ophthalmic surgical laser
9526608, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Apparatus for creating incisions to improve intraocular lens placement
9532708, Sep 17 2010 Alcon Inc Electronically controlled fixation light for ophthalmic imaging systems
9622913, May 18 2011 Alcon Inc Imaging-controlled laser surgical system
9629750, Apr 18 2012 TECHNOLOAS PERFECT VISION GMBH; Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH Surgical laser unit with variable modes of operation
9662198, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method for creating incisions to improve intraocular lens placement
9693903, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser ophthalmic surgery
9693904, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser ophthalmic surgery
9693905, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser ophthalmic surgery
9750640, Jan 10 2005 AMO Development, LLC Apparatus for patterned plasma-mediated laser ophthalmic surgery
9782253, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method for patterned plasma-mediated modification of the crystalline lens
9795472, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method for creating incision to improve intraocular lens placement
9820848, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method for creating incision to improve intraocular lens placement
9968439, Mar 13 2007 AMO Development, LLC Method for patterned plasma-mediated modification of the crystalline lens
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4002899, Jul 09 1973 Honeywell Inc. Focus detecting apparatus
4450358, Sep 22 1982 Honeywell Inc. Optical lithographic system
4700056, Nov 13 1985 Hewlett-Packard Company Objective lens focus initialization system
4786124, Apr 27 1987 University of Rochester Broad-spectrum achromatic phase shifters, phase modulators, frequency shifters, and frequency modulators
4899327, Feb 04 1985 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF CHICAGO Focus servo loop correction
4935763, Feb 02 1987 Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha Camera having a zoom lens unit
4984000, Nov 11 1988 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Lens driving apparatus for a camera
5161165, Sep 26 1991 Agilent Technologies Inc Multimode stabilized external cavity laser
5247153, Oct 05 1989 GEORGE TASH AND DEBRA B TASH, AS TRUSTEES OF THE COMMUNITY TRUST CREATED UNDER THE GEORGE TASH AND DEBRA B TASH INTER VIVOS TRUST AGREEMENT, DATED NOVEMBER 25, 1985, AS AMENDED AND TOTALLY RESTATED ON MAY 19, 1999 Method and apparatus for in-situ deformation of a surface, especially a non-planar optical surface
5475209, Oct 05 1993 MORI SEIKI CO , LTD Displacement measurement apparatus having first and second servo control circuits and a zone decision circuit
5696589, May 20 1996 Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. Optical caliper with compensation for specimen deflection and method
5768226, Dec 28 1992 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Information recording and/or reproducing method and apparatus in which seek of a recording and/or reproducing head is corrected on the basis of detected moving velocity
5923473, May 06 1997 HANGER SOLUTIONS, LLC Multi-size spot beam imaging system and method
6043843, May 06 1997 HANGER SOLUTIONS, LLC Computerized control of multi-size spot beam imaging
6160910, Dec 02 1998 BARCLAYS BANK PLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT High precision three dimensional mapping camera
6304359, Jul 20 1999 JAGMOHAN S GADHOK High scan efficiency galvanometric laser scanning device
6325793, Apr 30 1998 Nidek Co., Ltd. Laser treatment apparatus
6462814, Mar 15 2000 DCG Systems, Inc Beam delivery and imaging for optical probing of a device operating under electrical test
6483071, May 16 2000 BARCLAYS BANK PLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT Method and system for precisely positioning a waist of a material-processing laser beam to process microstructures within a laser-processing site
20040170312,
//////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Apr 20 2004IntraLase Corp.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Jun 01 2004JUHASZ, TIBORINTRALASE CORP ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0154810785 pdf
Jun 01 2004WEBB, R K INTRALASE CORP ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0154810785 pdf
Jun 01 2004GOLDSTEIN, PETERINTRALASE CORP ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0154810785 pdf
Jun 02 2004SUAREZ, CARLOS G INTRALASE CORP ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0154810785 pdf
Jun 02 2004DELONG, SCOTT A INTRALASE CORP ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0154810785 pdf
Apr 02 2007INTRALASE CORP BANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT0195010208 pdf
Jan 01 2008INTRALASE CORP AMO Development, LLCCHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0203090349 pdf
Jan 01 2008INTRALASE CORP AMO Development, LLCCORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE U S PATENT NO 5466233 WAS INCORRECTLY ASSIGNED TO AMO DEVELOPMENT, LLC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 020309 FRAME 0349 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE INTRALASE CORP 0206790026 pdf
Feb 25 2009BANK OF AMERICA, N A AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTAMO DEVELOPMENT, LLC, FORMERLY INTRALASE CORP RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0223200483 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Apr 18 2007STOL: Pat Hldr no Longer Claims Small Ent Stat
Oct 13 2009M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Sep 25 2013M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Sep 14 2017M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Apr 11 20094 years fee payment window open
Oct 11 20096 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 11 2010patent expiry (for year 4)
Apr 11 20122 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Apr 11 20138 years fee payment window open
Oct 11 20136 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 11 2014patent expiry (for year 8)
Apr 11 20162 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Apr 11 201712 years fee payment window open
Oct 11 20176 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 11 2018patent expiry (for year 12)
Apr 11 20202 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)