An electrostatic chuck is provided with a ceramic substrate 12 in which an electrode 14 is embedded, an electrode terminal 14a exposed at the bottom of a concave portion 16 disposed on the back surface of the ceramic substrate 12, a power feed member 20 to supply an electric power to the electrode 14, and a joining layer 22 to connect this power feed member 20 to the ceramic substrate 12. The joining layer 22 is formed by using a auge based alloy, a ausn based alloy, or a ausi based alloy. The ceramic substrate 12 and the power feed member 20 are selected in such a way that the thermal expansion coefficient difference D calculated by subtracting the thermal expansion coefficient of the ceramic substrate 12 from the thermal expansion coefficient of the power feed member 20 satisfies −2.2≦D≦6 (unit: ppm/K).
|
1. A member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus, comprising:
a ceramic substrate having a wafer placement surface;
an electrode embedded in the inside of the ceramic substrate;
an exposed electrode portion which is a part of the electrode and which is exposed at the surface opposite to the wafer placement surface of the ceramic substrate;
a power feed member to supply an electric power to the electrode; and
a joining layer which is interposed between the ceramic substrate and the power feed member and which joins the power feed member to the ceramic substrate and, at the same time, electrically connects the power feed member to the exposed electrode portion,
wherein the joining layer is formed by using a auge based alloy, a ausn based alloy, or a ausi based alloy, which is a joining material,
the ceramic substrate and the power feed member are selected in such a way that the thermal expansion coefficient difference D calculated by subtracting the thermal expansion coefficient of the ceramic substrate from the thermal expansion coefficient of the power feed member satisfies −2.2≦D≦6 (unit: ppm/K), and
the joint strength at 200° C. is 3.5 MPa or more.
2. The member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to
wherein the ceramic substrate and the power feed member are selected in such a way that the thermal expansion coefficient difference D satisfies −1.5≦D≦6 (unit: ppm/K).
3. The member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to
wherein the joining layer comprises an intermetallic compound phase generated through reaction between a metal contained in a metallized layer covering a predetermined region including the exposed electrode portion before joining and elements other than Au in the joining material.
4. The member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to
wherein the joining layer comprises a Au-rich phase generated by consumption of the elements other than Au in the joining material through reaction with the metal contained in the metallized layer.
5. The member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to
wherein the metallized layer, a layer primarily containing the intermetallic compound phase, and a layer primarily containing the Au-rich phase are stacked in the joining layer in that order from the ceramic substrate side.
6. The member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to
wherein a layer primarily containing the intermetallic compound phase is in contact with the metallized layer or the ceramic substrate in the joining layer.
7. The member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to
wherein a layer primarily containing the intermetallic compound phase is in contact with the metallized layer or the ceramic substrate in the joining layer.
8. The member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to
wherein a layer primarily containing the intermetallic compound phase is in contact with the metallized layer or the ceramic substrate in the joining layer.
9. The member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to
wherein the ceramic substrate comprises one type selected from the group consisting of Al2O3, AlN, MgO, Y2O3, and SiC as a primary component, and
the power feed member is selected from the group consisting of Ti, Cu, Ni, Mo, CuW, W, alloys thereof, and FeNiCo based alloys.
10. The member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to
wherein the C/R ratio of a clearance C, which is the value calculated by subtracting the diameter of the power feed member from the diameter of a hole in the ceramic substrate, to the diameter R of the hole in the ceramic substrate satisfies C/R≦0.15.
11. The member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to
wherein the C/R ratio satisfies C/R≦0.09.
12. The member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to
wherein the surface, which is opposite to the surface joined to the ceramic substrate, of the power feed member is joined to a coupling member, and the thermal expansion coefficient difference D′ calculated by subtracting the thermal expansion coefficient of the ceramic substrate from the thermal expansion coefficient of the coupling member is more than 6 ppm/K.
13. The member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to
wherein the coupling member is a metal formed from Cu or an alloy thereof.
14. The member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to
15. The member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to
|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus.
2. Description of the Related Art
In the field of semiconductor manufacturing apparatuses, alumina (Al2O3), aluminum nitride (AlN), and the like, which are dense ceramic, are used as a substrate for an electrostatic chuck. Production is performed in such a way that a high-frequency electrode is embedded in a ceramic substrate in order to generate plasma for semiconductor processing. Here, it is necessary that the electrode embedded in the ceramic substrate is electrically joined to a power feed terminal. As for this power feed terminal, a metal material having excellent electrical conductivity is used favorably. In general, the metal material has a large thermal expansion coefficient as compared with that of the ceramic. Therefore, in order to produce a product by being joined to the ceramic substrate, it is required that cracking resulting from a difference in thermal expansion coefficient between ceramic/metal does not occur at the time of joining and, in addition, high joint strength is ensured for the reliability of the product. As for such a joining material, for example, indium is used in PTLs 1 and 2. Consequently, the ceramic substrate can be joined to the power feed terminal with sufficiently high joint strength. Furthermore, indium is soft and, therefore, an occurrence of cracking in the ceramic substrate can be suppressed.
Meanwhile, in the case where the operation temperature of the electrostatic chuck is from room temperature to about 80° C., there is no problem in the use of indium as the joining material, as described in PTLs 1 and 2. However, in recent years, the needs for higher operation temperatures of the electrostatic chuck have been increased in order to etch a new material. Under such circumstances, there is a problem in that the melting point of indium is low and, therefore, in the case where the operation temperature is 150° C. to 200° C., sufficient joint strength is not obtained. Furthermore, in general, Ag based and Al based alloys are present as brazing filler metals for joining to the ceramic substrate, but all of them have high joining temperatures of 500° C. or higher. Therefore, there is a problem in that a residual stress at the time of joining becomes high. Meanwhile, in order to completely prevent an occurrence of cracking in a ceramic dielectric layer which has become thinner in recent years, a joining technology with a low residual stress is necessary and, in addition, a joining body having high joint strength at 200° C. has been required.
The present invention has been made to solve such problems. Accordingly, the main object of the present invention is to provide a member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus, wherein the residual stress at the time of joining is reduced, cracking does not occur in a ceramic substrate, and sufficient joint strength is obtained even when an operation temperature is 200° C.
A member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to the present invention includes:
a ceramic substrate having a wafer placement surface;
an electrode embedded in the inside of the ceramic substrate;
an exposed electrode portion which is a part of the electrode and which is exposed at the surface opposite to the wafer placement surface of the ceramic substrate;
a power feed member to supply an electric power to the electrode; and
a joining layer which is interposed between the ceramic substrate and the power feed member and which joins the power feed member to the ceramic substrate and, at the same time, electrically connects the power feed member to the exposed electrode portion,
wherein the joining layer is formed by using a AuGe based alloy, a AuSn based alloy, or a AuSi based alloy, which is a joining material,
the ceramic substrate and the power feed member are selected in such a way that the thermal expansion coefficient difference D calculated by subtracting the thermal expansion coefficient of the ceramic substrate from the thermal expansion coefficient of the power feed member satisfies −2.2≦D≦6 (unit: ppm/K), and
the joint strength at 200° C. is 3.5 MPa or more.
According to this member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus, the residual stress at the time of joining is reduced, cracking does not occur in a ceramic substrate having a reduced thickness, and sufficient joint strength is obtained even when an operation temperature is 200° C. That is, the member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to the present invention can be used at room temperature to 200° C. and, therefore, can respond to needs for higher temperatures required of electrostatic chuck and the like in recent years.
Here, it is not preferable that the thermal expansion coefficient difference D is larger than the upper limit value of 6 because interfacial peeling may occur from a joining end portion on the basis of a stress resulting from the thermal expansion coefficient difference and the joint strength may be reduced. Meanwhile, it is not preferable that the thermal expansion coefficient difference D is lower than the lower limit value of −2.2 because cracking may occur in the ceramic substrate on the basis of a stress resulting from the thermal expansion coefficient difference. It is more preferable that the ceramic substrate and the power feed member are selected in such a way that the thermal expansion coefficient difference D satisfies −2.2≦D≦0. In this regard, at the time of filing of the original application, it was believed that the appropriate range was −1.5≦D≦6. Thereafter, studies were performed over and over again and, at present, it has been found that −2.2≦D≦6 is still appropriate.
Regarding the member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to the present invention, it is preferable that the above-described joining layer contains an intermetallic compound phase generated through reaction between a metal contained in a metallized layer covering a predetermined region including the above-described exposed electrode portion before joining and elements other than Au in the above-described joining material. In addition, it is preferable that a Au-rich phase generated by consumption of the elements other than Au in the above-described joining material through reaction with the metal contained in the above-described metallized layer is contained. This Au-rich phase has advantages that the electrical resistance is low, so as to reduce an electric power loss at the time of feeding of an electric power, the residual stress at the time of joining is relaxed easily because of being soft, and the heat resistance can be enhanced because the melting point is raised as the Au concentration increases through reaction at the time of joining.
Regarding the member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus, in the case where the above-described joining layer contains the above-described intermetallic compound phase and the above-described Au-rich phase, it is preferable that the above-described intermetallic compound phase is present between the above-described ceramic substrate and the above-described Au-rich phase. Consequently, reduction in strength is not caused by interfacial peeling easily. Meanwhile, it is preferable that a layer primarily containing the intermetallic compound phase is in contact with the metallized layer or the ceramic substrate. Furthermore, it is preferable that the metallized layer, a layer primarily containing the above-described intermetallic compound phase, and a layer primarily containing the above-described Au-rich phase are stacked in the above-described joining layer in that order from the above-described ceramic substrate side. Consequently, it becomes more difficult that reduction in strength is caused by interfacial peeling. In this case, regarding a portion, in which the power feed member is joined to the ceramic substrate, in the joining layer, it is preferable that the ceramic substrate is in contact with the metalized layer, the metallized layer is in contact with the layer primarily containing the intermetallic compound phase, and the layer primarily containing the intermetallic compound phase is in contact with the layer primarily containing the Au-rich phase.
Regarding the member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to the present invention, the above-described ceramic substrate may contain one type selected from the group consisting of Al2O3, AlN, MgO, Y2O3, and SiC as a primary component, and the above-described power feed member may be selected from the group consisting of Ti, Cu, Ni, Mo, CuW, W, alloys thereof, and FeNiCo based alloys (for example, Kovar (registered trademark)). The ceramic substrate and the power feed member may be selected from the above-described substances in such a way that the thermal expansion coefficient difference D calculated by subtracting the thermal expansion coefficient of the ceramic substrate from the thermal expansion coefficient of the power feed member satisfies −2.2≦D≦6 (unit: ppm/K).
Regarding the member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to the present invention, when the value of a clearance, which is the value calculated by subtracting the diameter of the power feed member from the diameter of a hole in the ceramic substrate, is represented by C, it is preferable that the C/R ratio of C to the diameter R of the hole of the above-described ceramic substrate satisfies C/R≦0.15. In this case, when C/R≦0.15 is satisfied, the joint strength between the ceramic substrate and the power feed member becomes high as compared with that in the case where C/R is out of this range. In addition, the ceramic substrate and the power feed member are preferably selected in such a way that the thermal expansion coefficient difference D satisfies −2.2≦D≦0 (unit: ppm/K), and are more preferably selected in such a way that the −2.2≦D≦−1.0 (unit: ppm/K) is satisfied. Consequently, the joint strength is more enhanced because a state in which the power feed member is shrinkage-fitted to the ceramic substrate with the joining layer therebetween can be brought about. Meanwhile, in the case where C/R 0.15 is satisfied, if the value of C/R is large, it is difficult to arrange the power feed member at the center of the hole in the ceramic substrate well. As a result, strength variations occur easily. Therefore, it is preferable that C/R≦0.09 is satisfied in order to obtain a joining body having higher strength, less variations, and high reliability.
Regarding the member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to the present invention, the surface which is opposite to the surface joined to the above-described ceramic substrate, of the above-described power feed member is joined to a coupling member, and the thermal expansion coefficient difference D′ calculated by subtracting the thermal expansion coefficient of the above-described ceramic substrate from the thermal expansion coefficient of the coupling member may be more than 6 ppm/K. Such a structure is suitable for the case where the electrical resistance is low and feeding of a large current to an electrode is intended, for example, use of pure Cu or an alloy thereof is intended. In this regard, if the coupling member is joined to the ceramic substrate without through the power feed member, the thermal expansion coefficient difference D′ is large, so that peeling occurs at a joining interface. However, such a problem does not occur here because joining is performed through the power feed member.
A method for manufacturing the member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to the present invention includes
(a) a step to prepare the ceramic substrate which has a wafer placement surface and in which an electrode is embedded in the inside, an exposed electrode portion as a part of the electrode is exposed at the surface opposite to the above-described wafer placement surface, and the metallized layer covers a predetermined region including the above-described exposed electrode portion in the surface opposite to the above-described wafer placement surface,
(b) a step to select the power feed member to supply an electric power to the above-described electrode in such a way that the thermal expansion coefficient difference D calculated by subtracting the thermal expansion coefficient of the above-described ceramic substrate from the thermal expansion coefficient of the power feed member satisfies −2.2≦D≦6 (unit: ppm/K), and
(c) a step to heat and, thereafter, cool while the above-described power feed member is fixed to the region covered with the above-described metallized layer with a AuGe based alloy, a AuSn based alloy, or a AuSi based alloy, which serves as a joining material, therebetween.
According to the method for manufacturing the member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to the present invention, the above-described member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to the present invention can be produced easily. In this regard, the temperature in the heating in the step (c) may be set appropriately at a temperature, at which peeling does not occur at the joining interface and cracking does not occur in the ceramic substrate, in accordance with the thermal expansion coefficient difference D. However, 200° C. to 500° C. is desirable, and in particular 250° C. to 420° C. is preferable because the residual stress in the vicinity of the joining interface increases as the heating temperature becomes high.
The present embodiment explains an electrostatic chuck 10 which is an example of a member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus.
As shown in
As shown in
The power feed member 20 is a member to feed an electric power to the electrode 14 and is joined to the ceramic substrate 12 with a joining layer 22 therebetween while being inserted in the concave portion 16. The diameter of this power feed member 20 is designed to become slightly smaller than the diameter of the concave portion 16. That is, a clearance is present between the outer circumference surface of the power feed member 20 and the inner circumference surface of the concave portion 16. This clearance is disposed in such a way that the power feed member 20 does not come into contact with the concave portion 16 even when the power feed member 20 is thermally expanded in joining. Meanwhile, the upper portion of the power feed member 20 is connected to an external power supply with a groove 20a or the like. The joining layer 22 is interposed between the power feed member 20 and the concave portion 16 of the ceramic substrate 12, so as to join the power feed member 20 to the ceramic substrate 12 and, at the same time, electrically connect the power feed member 20 to the electrode terminal 14a.
The ceramic substrate 12 is produced from, for example, alumina (Al2O3), aluminum nitride (AlN), yttria (Y2O3), or silicon carbide (SiC), which is dense ceramic. Table 1 shows the thermal expansion coefficient of each ceramic at 300° C. The value of the thermal expansion coefficient at 300° C. is shown because the joining temperature in the present invention is about 300° C. Alternatively, as for the ceramic substrate 12, a dense material containing dense magnesia (MgO) as a primary component can also be used. Although not shown in Table 1, the thermal expansion coefficient of high-purity MgO at 300° C. is 12.6 ppm/K.
As for the electrode 14, a material which has electrical conductivity and, in addition, which is not melted in sintering of the ceramic substrate is favorable. For example, W, W carbides, W silicides, Mo, Mo carbides, Mo silicides, Nb, Nb carbides, Nb silicides, Ta, Ta carbides, Ta silicides, Fe, Ni, Ti, platinum, rhodium, and the like and, in addition, mixtures of them and materials for the ceramic, substrate can be used.
Favorably, the electrical resistance of the power feed member 20 is low because it is necessary to feed an electric power to the electrode 14. At this time, as for a guideline of the electrical resistivity, about 1.0×10−3 Ωcm or less is preferable. As for the material for the power feed member 20, in consideration of suppression of an occurrence of cracking in the ceramic substrate 12 at the time of joining and suppression of peeling at the interface, a material having a thermal expansion coefficient close to that of the ceramic substrate 12 is favorable. However, sometimes limitation to the usable material may occur depending on the use environment or application of the product. Here, the ceramic substrate 12 and the power feed member 20 are specified to be selected in such a way that the thermal expansion coefficient difference D calculated by subtracting the thermal expansion coefficient of the ceramic substrate 12 from the thermal expansion coefficient of the power feed member 20 satisfies −2.2≦D≦6 (unit: ppm/K). If the thermal expansion coefficient difference D is more than the upper limit value, the shrinkage stress on the power feed member 20 side at the time of joining is too large, and unfavorably, the joint strength is reduced because of an occurrence of interfacial peeling from the joining end portion. Meanwhile, if the thermal expansion coefficient difference D is less than the lower limit value, unfavorably, cracking may occur on the concave portion side-surface side of the ceramic substrate 12 because of a stress generated in the radius direction of the power feed member. Examples of the materials for the power feed member 20 include metals selected from the group consisting of Ti, Mo, CuW, W, alloys thereof, and furthermore, FeNiCo based alloys (Kovar (registered trademark)). Meanwhile, in the case where a material, e.g., MgO, exhibiting high thermal expansion is used for the ceramic substrate, Ti, Cu, Ni, an alloy thereof, or the like can be used as the material for the power feed member 20. Table 1 shows the thermal expansion coefficient of each material at 300° C. In this regard, the power feed member 20 is not specifically limited to a metal insofar as the power feed member 20 is formed from an electrically conductive material. Examples of materials may include graphite, carbide ceramic (WC, TaC, and the like), silicide ceramic (MoSi2, TiSi2, and the like), boride ceramic (TaB2, TiB2, and the like), and ceramic/metal composites (SiC/Al, C/Cu, and the like).
TABLE 1
Thermal
expansion
coefficient
Material
(ppm/K)
Ceramic substrate
AlN
5.3
Al2O3
6.6
Y2O3
7.2
SiC
3.7
Power feed terminal
Ti
10.4
Mo
5.3
W
4.5
CuW (11%Cu—89%W)
6.5
FeNiCo based
5.1
(Kovar(registered trademark))
Ni
14.3
Cu
18.9
(*)300° C. measured data
The joining layer 22 is a layer formed from basically a AuGe based alloy, a AuSn based alloy, or a AuSi based alloy, which is a joining material. In recent years, in order to improve the thermal responsiveness, the thickness of the electrostatic chuck has been reduced, and the thickness of a ceramic dielectric layer to adsorb a wafer has also been reduced. Therefore, there is a problem in that cracking occurs in the dielectric layer easily depending on the residual stress at the time of joining. Consequently, low-temperature joining has been required.
Here, as for the joining material to join the ceramic substrate 12 to the power feed member 20, Al brazing filler, Ag brazing filler, Ni brazing filler, Cu brazing filler, Pb-free solder, In solder, and the like are mentioned in general. Among them, for example, regarding the Ag brazing filler (or AgCuTi active brazing filler metal) commonly used for ceramic joining, the joining temperature is high and is about 800° C., and as for Al brazing filler, about 600° C. The thickness of the ceramic dielectric layer has been reduced and, therefore, there is a problem in that the possibility of occurrence of cracking on the basis of the residual stress at the time of joining increases. Consequently, a technology in which joining can be performed at a further low temperature of about 500° C. has been required from the viewpoint of reduction in residual stress. In addition, there is an advantage that it becomes possible to reduce the cost of the product on the basis of reduction in production cycle time resulting from lowering of the joining temperature. Meanwhile, it is favorable that the electrical resistivity of the joining material is low because the power feed member 20 is electrically connected to the electrode 14, and about 1.0×10−3 Ωcm or less is desirable. Therefore, as for low-temperature joining, Pb-free solder, In solder, and the like have been used previously, wherein joining is possible at about 200° C. As a trend in the electrostatic chuck, the operating temperature has been room temperature to about 80° C. up to now, whereas in recent years, the needs for higher process temperatures (150° C. to 200° C.) have been increased for etching of a new material, and a joining technology has been required in which the heat resistance at 200° C. is ensured while the joining temperature is lowered to about 500° C. or lower.
The present inventors performed various studies on the joining material. As a result, it was found that among Au based joining materials, a AuSn based alloy (for example, the content of Sn was 15 to 37 percent by weight), a AuGe based alloy (for example, the content of Ge was 10 to 17 percent by weight), and a AuSi based alloy (for example, the content of Si was 3 to 4 percent by weight), which had lowered melting points because of the eutectic compositions, were favorable. Meanwhile, a metal of the metallized layer covering the bottom and the side surface of the concave portion 16 of the ceramic substrate 12 before joining is reacted with solute elements in the Au based joining material and, thereby, an intermetallic compound phase is generated in the joining layer 22. For example, in the case where the metallized layer is Ni and the Au based joining material is the AuGe based alloy, a NiGe phase is generated as the intermetallic compound phase. In the case where the metallized layer is Ni and the Au based joining material is the AuSn based alloy, a Ni3Sn4 phase is generated as the intermetallic compound phase. In the case where the metallized layer is Ni and the Au based joining material is the AuSi based alloy, a NiSi2 phase is generated as the intermetallic compound phase. In addition, other intermetallic compounds may be generated. In this joining layer 22, a phase containing less solute elements, that is, a Au-rich phase having a high Au concentration, is also generated by consumption of the solute elements through reaction with the metal contained in the metalized layer. The Au-rich phase has advantages that an electric power loss at the time of feeding of an electric power is small because the electrical resistance is low, the residual stress at the time of joining is relaxed easily because of being soft, and the heat resistance can be enhanced because the melting point is raised as the Au concentration increases through reaction.
Next, an example of a method for joining the ceramic substrate 12 to the power feed member 20 will be described with reference to
Initially, as shown in
Then, a joining material 44 (AuSn based alloy, AuGe based alloy, or AuSi based alloy) is prepared on the metallized layer 18. Here, a foil-shaped rolled thin sheet is used as the joining material, although a paste-like joining material may be used. Subsequently, a lower portion of the power feed member 20 prepared separately is inserted into the concave portion 16 and is set in a furnace while a weight is placed on the power feed member 20 (refer to
According to the electrostatic chuck 10 of the present embodiment described above, the residual stress at the time of joining is reduced, cracking does not occur in the ceramic substrate, and sufficient joint strength and electrical conduction characteristics are obtained even when the operating temperature is 200° C. because the above-described joining structure is adopted. That is, the electrostatic chuck 10 can be used at room temperature to 200° C. and, thereby, it is possible to respond to needs for higher temperatures sufficiently.
Furthermore, the joining layer 22 has the Au-rich phase. This Au-rich phase has advantages that an electric power loss at the time of feeding of an electric power is small because the electrical resistance is low, the residual stress at the time of joining is relaxed easily because of being soft, and the heat resistance is high because the melting point is high.
It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, and can be realized in various forms within the technical scope of the present invention.
For example, a power feed member 50 shown in
In the above-described embodiment, the concave portion 16 is disposed in the ceramic substrate 12. However, as shown in
In the above-described embodiment, the example in which the structure of the member for a semiconductor manufacturing apparatus according to the present invention is applied to the electrostatic chuck 10 is shown, although not specifically limited to this. For example, application to a ceramic heater and the like may be made.
[1-1] Production Procedure of Specimen S1
Specimen S1 simulating the joining structure shown in
[1-2] Production Procedure of Specimen S2
Specimen S2 simulating the joining structure shown in
[1-3] Production Procedure of Specimens S3 to S6
Specimens S3 to S6 simulating the joining structure shown in
[2-1] Evaluation of Joint Strength
A tensile test was performed to evaluate the joint strength. Specimens S1 to S6 used for the tensile test were produced in the above-described production procedure. In this regard, ceramic substrates 72 and 82, in which the electrode was not embedded, were used. Meanwhile, the power feed member 76 and the coupling member 89, which were provided with a female screw of M3 in the upper surface, were used. Regarding the tensile test, each of Specimens S1 to S6 was fixed with a test jig and was connected through the female screws on the upper surfaces of the power feed member 76 and the coupling member 89. The power feed member 76 and the coupling member 89 were drawn at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min, and a load at the time of fracture was measured. Thereafter, the joint strength was calculated on the basis of the areas of the individual member bottoms. This test was performed at 200° C. The test at 200° C. was performed after Specimens S1 to S6 were heated with a heater and, thereby, the whole reached 200° C., followed by soaking. At least three joining bodies were subjected to the tensile test, and an average strength of the joining bodies was calculated. In this regard, in the case where the fracture stress at 200° C. was 3.5 MPa or more, it was determined that the joint strength was sufficient in order that the durability was ensured against a force applied in use environment and handling of the joining section.
[2-2] Evaluation of Cracking
In order to evaluate presence or absence of cracking in the dielectric layer in the ceramic substrate, a fluorescent-penetrant inspection, which was a nondestructive inspection, was performed. Specimens S1 to S6 used for the fluorescent-penetrant inspection were produced in the production procedure according to the above-described item [1]. In this regard, ceramic substrates 72 and 82, in which the electrode was embedded, were used. Concretely, the electrodes were embedded at positions having a height of 0.3 to 0.5 mm from the surfaces (wafer surfaces) opposite to the surfaces provided with the concave portions 74 and 84 of the ceramic substrates 72 and 82. Regarding the fluorescent-penetrant inspection, a commercially available fluorescent-penetrant liquid was penetrated into the surfaces opposite to the surfaces provided with the concave portions 74 and 84 of Specimens S1 to S6. Thereafter, black light (ultraviolet rays) was applied and presence or absence of cracking was evaluated.
[2-3] Evaluation of Interfacial Peeling
In order to evaluate presence or absence of interfacial peeling in the joining portion of the concave portion of the ceramic substrate and the lower surface of the power feed member, a fluorescent-penetrant inspection was performed. This fluorescent-penetrant inspection was performed at the same time with the above-described tensile test at room temperature according to the above-described item [2-1]. That is, in the tensile test according to the above-described item [2-1], the fluorescent-penetrant liquid (as described above) was applied to the joining portion of the ceramic substrates 72 and 82 and the power feed members 76 and 86 of Specimens S1 to S6 from the outer circumference of the power feed members 76 and 86 in advance, and was penetrated into the interfacial portion by a vacuum impregnation treatment, followed by drying. Thereafter, the tensile test of Specimens S1 to S6 at room temperature was performed to measure the load at the time of fracture and, in addition, black light was applied to the concave portions 74 and 84 of ceramic substrates 72 and 82 after fracture to evaluate the peeling state at the joining interface. Here, in the case where peeling had occurred at the joining interface before the tensile test, the fluorescent-penetrant liquid was penetrated to the lower surface of the power feed member and, therefore, the interface shone bright when the back light was applied. In contrast, in the case where peeling had not occurred at the joining interface before the tensile test, the interface did not shine bright and remained in the dark state. Consequently, presence or absence of interfacial peeling was evaluated on the basis of whether the interface shone or not when the black light was applied. In this regard, as for the evaluation criteria, a symbol ◯ indicated 100% to 70%, a symbol Δ indicated 70% to 30%, and a symbol x indicated 30% or less on the basis of the area ratio of the joining portion in the power feed member bottom.
[2-5] Microstructure Observation, EDS Analysis
Microstructure observation of the sample was performed by using SEM (scanning electron microscope). Furthermore, at the time of SEM observation, point analysis by EDS was performed for element analysis of each phase after joining.
Here, various studies on the material for the power feed member 76 were performed by using Al2O3 as the ceramic substrate 72 and using a AuGe based alloy as the joining material 78. Table 2 shows the temperatures and atmospheres in joining at that time. In this regard, the individual evaluation results are also shown in Table 2.
In Examples 1 to 4 and Comparative examples 1 and 2, Ti was used as the material for the power feed member 76. The thermal expansion coefficient difference D (ppm/K) at this time was 3.8. As shown in Examples 1 to 4, in the case where the joining temperature was 330° C. to 390° C., every joint strength at 200° C. was 3.5 MPa or more, and cracking did not occur. Regarding Example 4 (joining temperature 330° C.), in microstructure observation, three layers were observed between the ceramic substrate and the power feed member, similarly to
From these results, it is believed that in the case where the power feed member 76 was Ti and the ceramic substrate 72 was alumina, that is, in the case where the thermal expansion coefficient difference D (ppm/K) was 3.8 and was within the range of 0 to 6, regarding Examples 2 and 4 having microstructures shown in
In Examples 5 to 7, Mo was used as the material for the power feed member 76. In the case where the joining temperature was within the range of 340° C. to 410° C., every joint strength at 200° C. was high, and cracking did not occur. Regarding Example 6 (joining temperature 330° C.), in microstructure observation, three layers were observed between the ceramic substrate and the power feed member, as shown in
From these results, in the case where the power feed member 76 was Mo and the ceramic substrate 72 was alumina, the thermal expansion coefficient difference D (ppm/K) was −1.3 and was within the range of −2.2 to 0. Therefore, it is believed that even in the case where the joining temperature was 410° C., that is, in the case of a microstructure shown in
In Example 8, CuW was used as the material for the power feed member 76. In Example 9, a FeNiCo based alloy (Kovar (registered trademark)) was used as the material for the power feed member 76. In Example 10, W was used as the material for the power feed member 76. Every joint strength at 200° C. was high, and cracking did not occur. It is believed that they also had the microstructure as shown in
In Comparative examples 3 and 4, Ni and Cu were used as the materials for the power feed member 76. Even when the joining temperature was 360° C., the joint strength at 200° C. was 3.5 MPa or less and was low. In particular, in the case where Cu was used for the power feed member, the evaluation results of interfacial peeling by the fluorescent-penetrant inspection were x, and regarding the results of the microstructure observation, gaps along with interfacial peeling were observed between the ceramic substrate and the joining material. It is believed in the case where Ni and Cu were used as the materials for the power feed member 76, the thermal expansion coefficient differences D (ppm/K) were 7.7 and 12.3, respectively, and were more than 6 and, thereby, the shrinkage stress of the power feed member 76 in the radius direction was large at the time of joining, so as to cause interfacial peeling.
Here, various studies on the material for the power feed member 76 were performed by using Al2O3 as the ceramic substrate 72 and using a AuSn based alloy as the joining material 78. Table 2 shows the temperatures and atmospheres in joining at that time. In this regard, the individual evaluation results are also shown in Table 2.
In Examples 11 to 13 and Comparative examples 5 and 6, Ti was used as the material for the power feed member 76. As shown in Examples 11 to 13, in the case where the joining temperature was 290° C. to 330° C., every joint strength at 200° C. was 3.5 MPa or more, and cracking did not occur. On the other hand, as shown in Comparative example 5, in the case where the joining temperature was 280° C., the joining material was not melted well and, thereby, the joint strength was not able to be evaluated. Meanwhile, as shown in Comparative example 6, in the case where the joining temperature was 370° C., the joint strength was less than 3.5 MPa and was insufficient. Regarding Comparative example 6, it is believed that according to the result of the microstructure observation and the EDS analysis, the reaction with the Ni plating layer by the joining material was too strong and there was a thermal expansion difference between the power feed member 76 and the ceramic substrate 72 and, thereby, interfacial peeling occurred easily so as to cause a reduction in strength, as in Comparative example 2.
In Examples 14 to 17, Mo was used as the material for the power feed member 76. In the case where the joining temperature was within the range of 310° C. to 370° C., every joint strength at 200° C. was high, and cracking did not occur. In Examples 18 and 19, CuW was used as the material for the power feed member 76. In Example 20, a FeNiCo based alloy (Kovar (registered trademark)) was used as the material for the power feed member 76. In Example 21, W was used as the material for the power feed member 76. Every joint strength at 200° C. was high, and cracking did not occur. It is believed that the thermal expansion coefficients of all of Mo, CuW, Kovar, and W were close to the thermal expansion coefficient of alumina ceramic, so as to suppress interfacial peeling.
In Comparative examples 7 and 8, Ni and Cu were used as the materials for the power feed member 76. Even when the joining temperature was 310° C., the joint strength at 200° C. was 3.5 MPa or less and was low. In particular, in the case where Cu was used for the power feed member, the thermal expansion coefficient difference was large as in Comparative example 4, and it is believed that the shrinkage stress of the power feed member Cu in the radius direction was large at the time of joining, so as to cause interfacial peeling.
As for the ceramic substrate 72, AlN was used in Examples 22 to 25, Y2O3 was used in Examples 26 and 27, and SiC was used in Examples 28 and 29. Meanwhile, a AuGe based alloy and a AuSn based alloy were used as the joining material 78. Furthermore, any one of Mo, CuW, and W was used as the power feed member 76. Then, joining was performed at a joining temperature and in an atmosphere shown in Table 2. As a result, it was found that good results were obtained even in the case where the ceramic substrate was changed, as shown in Table 2.
As for the ceramic substrate 72, Al2O3, AlN, and Y2O3 were used. Meanwhile, a AuSi based alloy was used as the joining material 78. Furthermore, any one of Mo and CuW was used as the power feed member 76. Then, joining was performed at a joining temperature and in an atmosphere shown in Table 2. As a result, it was found that regarding the AuSi based alloy, good results were obtained in the same manner as those of the other joining materials, as shown in Table 2.
In all cases, Al2O3 was used as the ceramic substrate 72. In Comparative example 9, a ZnAl based alloy having a melting point of 500° C. or lower was used as the joining material 78, but the joint strength at 200° C. was less than 3.5 MPa. It is believed that ZnAl exhibited poor wetting and spreading properties and, thereby, the joint strength was low. In Comparative examples 10 and 11, In was used as the joining material 78, but the strength at 200° C. was not exerted because the melting point of In was about 180° C. In Comparative example 12, an active brazing filler metal (Ag—Cu—Ti material) was used as the joining material 78 which was used for ceramic joining in general. However, the joining temperature was high, so that the residual stress increased and cracking occurred. In this regard, in Comparative example 12, a metallized layer was not disposed on the concave portion 74 because the active metal was used and, therefore, was able to be joined to alumina directly. Consequently, it is believed that low-temperature joining at about 500° C. or lower was effective to suppress cracking through reduction in residual stress and, in addition, use of joining body by using the Au based alloy according to the present invention was effective to obtain 200° C. strength.
In Examples 33 to 35, Al2O3 was used as the ceramic substrate 72, and Mo, CuW, and Kovar were used as the materials for the power feed member 76. In examples 36 and 37, MgO was used as the ceramic substrate 72, and Ni was used as the power feed member 76. Furthermore, as for the joining material 78, AuSn was used in Examples 33 to 35 and 37, and AuGe was used in Example 36. Then, joining was performed at a joining temperature and in an atmosphere shown in Table 2. As a result, it was found that good results were obtained in every case. The reason is believed to be that AuGe and AuSn exhibited good wetting and spreading properties and the thermal expansion coefficient differences D were small. Meanwhile, in Comparative example 13, MgO was used as the ceramic substrate 72, W was used as the power feed member 76, and AuGe was used as the joining material 78. In this case, the D value became too small and, thereby, cracking occurred into the ceramic substrate 72, as described above, so that joining was unsatisfactory.
In consideration of the above-described results of Specimen S1, a joining body was produced by using a structure simulating
In Examples 38 to 45, an evaluation test was performed by using Specimen S2. As for the material for the ceramic substrate 82, Al2O3 was used in Examples 38 to 42 and 45, AlN was used in Example 43, and Y2O3 was used in Example 44. Meanwhile, any one of Mo, CuW, and a FeNiCo based alloy (Kovar) was used as the power feed member 86, and Cu was used as all coupling members 89. A AuGe based alloy, a AuSn based alloy, or a AuSi based alloy was used as the joining material 88. Then, joining was performed at a joining temperature and in an atmosphere shown in Table 3. As a result, a good result was obtained in every case, as shown in Table 3. According to this, it was found that the thermal expansion coefficient difference was relaxed by employing the above-described structure and, in addition, integration was possible through simultaneous joining in one operation, whereas in the case where Cu of the power feed member was joined to the ceramic substrate directly, the 200° C. strength was low because of interfacial peeling, as in Comparative examples 4 and 8.
TABLE 2
Power
Joining
200° C.
Ceramic
feed
D
Joining
temperature
strength
Cracking
Interfacial
Classification
substrate
member
(ppm/K)
material
(° C.)
Atmosphere
(MPa)
evaluation
peeling
Remarks
Example 1
Al2O3
Ti
3.8
AuGe
390
N2
4.2
◯
Δ
Example 2
Al2O3
Ti
3.8
AuGe
360
N2
7.8
◯
Δ
Example 3
Al2O3
Ti
3.8
AuGe
340
N2
8.1
◯
Δ
Example 4
Al2O3
Ti
3.8
AuGe
330
N2
8.8
◯
Δ
Comparative
Al2O3
Ti
3.8
AuGe
310
N2
—
—
—
Not jointed
example 1
Comparative
Al2O3
Ti
3.8
AuGe
410
N2
2.5
—
X
example 2
Example 5
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
AuGe
360
N2
14.8
◯
◯
Example 6
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
AuGe
330
N2
15.9
◯
◯
Example 7
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
AuGe
410
N2
9.2
◯
◯
Example 8
Al2O3
CuW
−0.1
AuGe
360
N2
11.3
◯
◯
Example 9
Al2O3
Kovar
−1.5
AuGe
360
N2
14.5
◯
◯
Example 10
Al2O3
W
−2.1
AuGe
360
N2
14.7
◯
◯
Comparative
Al2O3
Ni
7.7
AuGe
360
N2
1.8
—
X
example 3
Comparative
Al2O3
Cu
12.3
AuGe
360
N2
<0.4
—
X
example 4
Example 11
Al2O3
Ti
3.8
AuSn
330
Vac.
6.4
◯
Δ
Example 12
Al2O3
Ti
3.8
AuSn
310
Vac.
7.4
◯
Δ
Example 13
Al2O3
Ti
3.8
AuSn
290
Vac.
8.1
◯
Δ
Comparative
Al2O3
Ti
3.8
AuSn
280
Vac.
—
—
—
Not jointed
example 5
Comparative
Al2O3
Ti
3.8
AuSn
370
Vac.
2.1
—
X
example 6
Example 14
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
AuSn
330
Vac.
12.7
◯
◯
Example 15
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
AuSn
370
Vac.
7.8
◯
◯
Example 16
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
AuSn
310
Vac.
13.4
◯
◯
Example 17
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
AuSn
310
N2
14.1
◯
◯
Example 18
Al2O3
CuW
−0.1
AuSn
310
Vac.
9.5
◯
◯
Example 19
Al2O3
CuW
−0.1
AuSn
310
N2
8.5
◯
◯
Example 20
Al2O3
Kovar
−1.5
AuSn
310
Vac.
13.8
◯
◯
Example 21
Al2O3
W
−2.1
AuSn
310
Vac.
13.6
◯
◯
Comparative
Al2O3
Ni
7.7
AuSn
310
Vac.
1.4
—
X
example 7
Comparative
Al2O3
Cu
12.3
AuSn
310
Vac.
<0.4
—
X
example 8
Example 22
AlN
Mo
0
AuGe
360
N2
9.9
◯
◯
Example 23
AlN
CuW
1.2
AuGe
360
N2
7.4
◯
◯
Example 24
AlN
Mo
0
AuSn
310
Vac.
8.5
◯
◯
Example 25
AlN
CuW
1.2
AuSn
310
Vac.
6.7
◯
◯
Example 26
Y2O3
CuW
−0.7
AuGe
360
N2
11.3
◯
◯
Example 27
Y2O3
CuW
−0.7
AuSn
310
Vac.
8.5
◯
◯
Example 28
SiC
W
0.8
AuGe
360
N2
9.2
◯
◯
Example 29
SiC
W
0.8
AuSn
310
Vac.
7.4
◯
◯
Example 30
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
AuSi
390
Vac.
12.4
◯
◯
Example 31
AlN
Mo
0
AuSi
390
Vac.
8.1
◯
◯
Example 32
Y2O3
CuW
−0.7
AuSi
390
Vac.
10.2
◯
◯
Comparative
Al2O3
Ti
3.8
ZnAl
430
N2
1.4
—
X
example 9
Comparative
Al2O3
Cu
12.3
In
180
Air
0
◯
◯
example 10
Comparative
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
In
180
Air
0
◯
◯
example 11
Comparative
Al2O3
Ti
3.8
AgCuTi
850
Vac.
—
X
—
example 12
Example 33
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
AuSn
280
N2
14.5
◯
◯
Example 34
Al2O3
CuW
−0.1
AuSn
280
N2
10.1
◯
◯
Example 35
Al2O3
Kovar
−1.5
AuSn
280
N2
14.3
◯
◯
Example 36
MgO
Ni
1.8
AuGe
360
N2
7.1
◯
◯
Example 37
MgO
Ni
1.8
AuSn
310
Vac.
6.4
◯
◯
Comparative
MgO
W
−8.1
AuGe
360
N2
—
X
—
example 13
TABLE 3
Power
Joining
200° C.
Ceramic
feed
D
Coupling
D′
Joining
temperature
strength
Cracking
Interfacial
substrate
member
(ppm/K)
member
(ppm/K)
material
(° C.)
Atmosphere
(MPa)
evaluation
peeling
Example 38
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
Cu
12.3
AuGe
360
N2
13.4
◯
◯
Example 39
Al2O3
CuW
−0.1
Cu
12.3
AuGe
360
N2
10.2
◯
◯
Example 40
Al2O3
Kovar
−1.5
Cu
12.3
AuGe
360
N2
12.4
◯
◯
Example 41
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
Cu
12.3
AuSn
310
Vac.
12.7
◯
◯
Example 42
Al2O3
CuW
−0.1
Cu
12.3
AuSn
310
Vac.
8.5
◯
◯
Example 43
AlN
Mo
0
Cu
13.6
AuGe
360
N2
9.5
◯
◯
Example 44
Y2O3
CuW
−0.7
Cu
11.7
AuSn
310
Vac.
7.8
◯
◯
Example 45
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
Cu
12.3
AuSi
390
Vac.
11.6
◯
◯
Meanwhile, regarding, Specimen S2, the ceramic substrate 82 and the power feed member 86, and the power feed member 86 and the coupling member 89 were joined respectively with the joining material 88 at the same time. However, the power feed member 86 and the coupling member 89 may be joined through welding or brazing in advance and, thereafter, the ceramic substrate 82 and the power feed member 86 joined to the coupling member 89 may be joined with the joining material 88. For example, the power feed member 86 formed from Mo and the coupling member 89 formed from Cu was welded in advance by using a AgCu based alloy, so as to produce a Cu/Mo composite power feed member. Subsequently, the bottom and the side surface thereof were subjected to Ni electroplating. Then, the resulting member was joined to the concave portion 84 of the ceramic substrate 82 by using the joining material 88 formed from a AuGe based alloy at 360° C. in a N2 atmosphere. As a result, the joint strength at 200° C. was 11.3 MPa, cracking did not occur, and the characteristics were favorable.
Various studies on Specimens S3 to S6 having different C/R ratios were performed. Specimen S3 (C/R=0.017) was used in Example 46, Specimen S4 (C/R=0.042) was used in Examples 47 and 49, Specimen S5 (C/R=0.083) was used in Example 48, and Specimen S6 (C/R=0.133) was used in Example 50. Furthermore, Al2O3 was used as the ceramic substrate 72, a AuGe based alloy or a AuSn based alloy was used as the joining material 78, and Mo was used as the power feed member 76. Table 4 shows the joining temperatures and atmospheres in Examples 46 to 50. Moreover, the individual evaluation results are also shown in Table 4. As a result of evaluation of the strength of Examples 46 to 48 and 50, the strength increased gradually as the C/R became small. Furthermore, regarding Example 5, the C/R was 0.008 and, therefore, the C/R was still smaller than those in Examples 46 to 48, so that the strength was further enhanced. Meanwhile, when Example 49 and Example 17, in which a AuSn alloy was used as the joining material 78, were compared, regarding Example 49, the strength of 12.4 MPa was obtained, whereas regarding Example 17, the strength was further enhanced because the C/R was 0.008 and was smaller than that in Example 49. Regarding Examples 46 to 50, D was within the range of −2.2 to −1.0, as described above, and it is believed that a compressive stress, which acted to the ceramic substrate side in the radius direction of the power feed member 76 through the joining layer, was increased and, as a result, the joint strength was increased. In this regard, in these Examples, C/R≦0.15 was satisfied and the 200° C. strength satisfied 3.5 MPa. However, if the value of C/R is large as in Example 50, it is difficult to arrange the power feed member at the center of the hole in the ceramic substrate well in the handling. As a result, strength variations occur easily. Therefore, it is preferable that C/R≦0.09 is satisfied in order to obtain a joining body having higher strength, less variations, and high reliability.
TABLE 4
Power
Joining
200° C.
Ceramic
feed
D
C/R
Joining
temperature
strength
Cracking
Interfacial
substrate
member
(ppm/K)
(—)
material
(° C.)
Atmosphere
(MPa)
evaluation
peeling
Example 46
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
0.017
AuGe
360
N2
14.5
◯
◯
Example 47
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
0.042
AuGe
360
N2
13.4
◯
◯
Example 48
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
0.083
AuGe
360
N2
10.9
◯
◯
Example 49
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
0.042
AuSn
310
N2
12.4
◯
◯
Example 50
Al2O3
Mo
−1.3
0.133
AuGe
360
N2
6.2
◯
◯
The present application claims the benefit of the priority from Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-079462 filed on Mar. 31, 2011, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Hayase, Toru, Katsuda, Yuji, Kida, Masahiro
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11472748, | Jun 28 2018 | Kyocera Corporation | Manufacturing method for a member for a semiconductor manufacturing device and member for a semiconductor manufacturing device |
11869796, | Mar 26 2019 | NITERRA CO , LTD | Electrode-embedded member and method for manufacturing same, electrostatic chuck, and ceramic heater |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5707715, | Aug 29 1996 | L. Pierre, deRochemont; DEROCHEMONT, L PIERRE | Metal ceramic composites with improved interfacial properties and methods to make such composites |
6143432, | Jan 09 1998 | L. Pierre, deRochemont | Ceramic composites with improved interfacial properties and methods to make such composites |
6797413, | Feb 07 2000 | Ifire IP Corporation; IFIRE TECHNOLOGY LTD | Composite substrate and EL device using the same |
7608917, | May 17 2006 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Power semiconductor module |
8193634, | Jul 06 2007 | Lumentum Operations LLC | Mounted semiconductor device and a method for making the same |
20040146737, | |||
20070267739, | |||
20120250211, | |||
JP2002293655, | |||
JP2009060103, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Mar 15 2012 | NGK Insulators, Ltd. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Mar 29 2012 | KIDA, MASAHIRO | NGK Insulators, Ltd | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 028207 | /0925 | |
Mar 30 2012 | HAYASE, TORU | NGK Insulators, Ltd | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 028207 | /0925 | |
Mar 30 2012 | KATSUDA, YUJI | NGK Insulators, Ltd | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 028207 | /0925 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
May 24 2018 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
May 25 2022 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 09 2017 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 09 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 09 2018 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 09 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 09 2021 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 09 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 09 2022 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 09 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 09 2025 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 09 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 09 2026 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 09 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |