This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawTwo’. The new cultivar is primarily characterized by its large fruit size, heavy fruit production, and resistance to powdery mildew.
|
|
Genus and species: Fragaria×ananassa.
Variety denomination: ‘DrisStrawTwo’.
The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar designated ‘DrisStrawTwo’ and botanically known as Fragaria×ananassa. This new strawberry cultivar originated from a controlled cross between ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 14,771) and ‘Driscoll Marin’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,375). The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated by stolons at a nursery in Shasta County, Calif. Propagules were transplanted to a controlled breeding plot in Ventura County, Calif. where it was identified and selected for further evaluation in October, 2002. ‘DrisStrawTwo’ was subsequently asexually propagated and underwent further testing at various locations in Monterey County, Calif. for four years. The present invention has been found to retain its distinctive characteristics through successive asexual propagations.
The accompanying color photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions.
The following description of a 10 month old plant ‘DrisStrawTwo’ is based on observations taken during the 2006 growing season in Monterey County, Calif. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. ‘DrisStrawTwo’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. Color terminology follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London (R.H.S.) (2001).
Table 1 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the parents, ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Driscoll Marin’. Plant characteristics include plant habit, vigor, leaf shape in cross section, fruit length in centimeters, yield in grams per plant and reaction to powdery mildew.
TABLE 1
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawTwo’
‘Driscoll Camarillo’
Marin’
Habit
Flat globose
Globose
Flat
Vigor
Medium
Medium
Weak
Leaf shape in
Flat
Concave
Slightly
cross section
concave
Powdery
Resistant
Between susceptible &
Moderately
mildew
highly susceptible
susceptible
Table 2 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,145). Leaf characteristics include terminal leaflet length and width in centimeters, length to width ratio, number of teeth per terminal leaflet, shape of teeth, color of upperside and underside of leaf, leaf shape in cross section, leaf blistering, leaf glossiness, number of leaflets, shape of leaf margin and shape of leaf base.
TABLE 2
Leaf
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawTwo’
Camarillo’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
Terminal leaflet
0.76
0.71
0.76
length (cm)
Terminal leaflet
0.71
0.75
0.74
width (cm)
Terminal leaflet
1.06
0.95
1.02
length/width ratio
No. teeth/terminal
20
23
21
leaflet
Shape of teeth
Obtuse
Rounded
Rounded
Color of
RHS 147A
RHS 147A
RHS 139A
upperside of leaf
Dark yellow green
Dark yellow
Dark green
green
Color of
RHS 147B
RHS 138B
RHS 138B
underside of leaf
Dark yellow green
Dark green
Dark green
Leaf shape in
Flat
Concave
Between slightly
cross section
concave & flat
Leaf blistering
Strong
Very strong
Medium
Leaf glossiness
Medium
Between
Weak
medium &
strong
No. leaflets
Three only
Three only
Three only
Terminal leaflet
Between revolute
Between
Between revolute
margin
& flat
revolute &
& flat
flat
Terminal leaflet
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
base shape
Table 3 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract, and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’. This includes petiole length in centimeters, petiole diameter in centimeters, petiolule length in centimeters, petiolule diameter in centimeters, bract frequency per petiole, stipule length in centimeters, stipule width in centimeters, stipule pubescence, petiole pubescence, pose of hairs on the petiole, color of the petiole and color of the petiolule.
TABLE 3
‘Driscoll
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawTwo’
Camarillo’
Lanai’
Petiole length (cm)
18.8
16.8
18.3
Petiole diameter
0.286
0.331
0.260
(cm)
Petiole pubescence
Dense
Sparse
Medium
Petiole pose of hairs
Outwards
Outwards
Downwards
Petiole color
RHS 145A
RHS 149A
RHS 145A
Medium yellow
Light yellow
Medium yellow
green
green
green
Petiolule color
RHS 145B
RHS 144B
RHS 145A
Medium yellow
Medium yellow
Medium yellow
green
green
green
Petiolule length
1.590
1.376
1.308
(cm)
Petiolule diameter
0.185
0.194
0.148
(cm)
Bract frequency
0
0
0
Stipule length (cm)
3.8
4.0
3.3
Stipule width (cm)
0.794
0.866
0.550
Stipule pubescence
Sparse
Sparse
Between
medium &
dense
Table 4 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’. These characteristics include the number of stolons, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, the pubescence of the stolons, and the average number of daughter plants.
TABLE 4
‘Driscoll
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawTwo’
Camarillo’
Lanai’
Stolon Number
Medium
Medium
Many
Stolon Anthocyanin
Strong
Medium
Strong
Stolon Thickness
Thin
Between
Between
Medium &
Medium &
Thick
Thick
Stolon Pubescence
Sparse
Medium
Dense
Average Number of
Daughter Plants (Nursery
17
N/A
67
Average)
Table 5 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’. These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, relative flower size, flower diameter in centimeters (measured from petal tip to petal tip), relative spacing of petals, petal length in centimeters, petal width in centimeters, petal length to width ratio, petal color, calyx diameter in centimeters (measured on back of flower from sepal tip to sepal tip), diameter of calyx relative to corolla, diameter of inner calyx relative to outer, sepal length in centimeters (measured from sepal tip to point of attachment to receptacle), sepal width in centimeters, receptacle color and anther color.
TABLE 5
‘Driscoll
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawTwo’
Camarillo’
Lanai’
Inflorescence
Above
Above
Between level
position relative to
with & above
foliage
Flower size
Medium
Medium
Medium
Flower diameter
2.549
2.698
2.518
(cm)
Petal spacing
Overlapping
Overlapping
Overlapping
Petal length (cm)
1.156
1.275
1.103
Petal width (cm)
1.197
1.367
1.146
Petal length/width
0.97
0.93
0.96
ratio
Petal color
RHS 155D
RHS 155B
RHS 155C
White
White
White
Calyx diameter (cm)
3.260
3.236
3.469
Calyx diameter
Larger
Between
Between same
relative to corolla
smaller &
size & larger
same size
Inner calyx diameter
Between same
Same size
Larger
relative to outer
size & larger
Sepal length (cm)
1.108
1.118
1.187
Sepal width (cm)
0.608
0.709
0.630
Receptacle color
RHS 2A
RHS 1A
RHS 1B
Yellow
Green yellow
Green yellow
Anther color
RHS 15B
RHS 17A
RHS 9A
Yellow orange
Yellow orange
Yellow orange
Table 6 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’.
TABLE 6
‘Driscoll
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawTwo’
Camarillo’
Lanai’
Fruiting truss length
31.6
27.6
24.0
(cm)
Fruiting truss
Prostrate
Prostrate
Prostrate
attitude
Fruit length (cm)
4.51
3.59
3.63
Fruit width (cm)
3.59
3.29
3.48
Fruit length/width
1.26
1.09
1.04
ratio
Fruit weight (g)
24.7
20.6
24.2
Relative fruit size
Large
Between
Medium
medium & large
Predominant fruit
Conical
Cordate
Between
shape
conical &
ovoid
Difference in shape
Moderate
Slight
Slight
between primary &
secondary fruits
Band without
Medium
Absent or very
Between
achenes
narrow
narrow &
medium
Unevenness of fruit
Absent or very
Weak
Weak
surface
weak
Fruit skin color
RHS 45A
RHS 46A
RHS 45B
Red
Red
Orange red
Evenness of fruit
Even
Even
Even
color
Fruit glossiness
Strong
Strong
Strong
Insertion of achenes
Between level
Below surface
Level with
with surface &
surface
above surface
Achene coloration -
RHS 179A
RHS 184B
RHS 185B
sunward side of
Greyed red
Greyed purple
Greyed
berry
purple
Achene coloration -
RHS 3A
RHS 13B
RHS 154B
shaded side of berry
Yellow
Yellow
Yellow
green
Achenes per berry
233.7
224
226.8
Insertion of calyx
Set above fruit
In a basin
Level
Pose of calyx
Between
Reflexed
Between
segments
spreading &
spreading &
reflexed
reflexed
Size of calyx in
Smaller
Smaller
Smaller
relation to fruit
Adherence of calyx
Medium
Strong
Strong
Firmness of flesh
Firm
Firm
Medium
Evenness of flesh
Even
Slightly uneven
Uneven
color
Color of flesh
RHS 44C & RHS
RHS 34B &
RHS 47C
155B
RHS 155A
Orange red
Orange red &
Orange red &
white
white
Hollow center
Absent
Between absent
Medium
& small
Sweetness
Medium
Medium
Medium
Texture when tasted
Medium
Medium
Fine
Harvest maturity
Mid-season
Between early
Late
& mid-season
Type of bearing
Fully everbearing
Fully
Partially
everbearing
everbearing
Grams of fruit/plant
1,654.7
1,485.1
1,420.4
Table 7 shows pest and disease characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’.
TABLE 7
‘Driscoll
Pest or Disease
‘DrisStrawTwo’
‘Driscoll Camarillo’
Lanai’
Tetranychus
Susceptible
Moderately
Susceptible
urticae (2-spotted
Susceptible
spider mite)
Lygus hesperus
Susceptible
Susceptible
Susceptible
(Lygus bug)
Botrytis fruit rot
Moderately
Between moderately
Susceptible
Susceptible
resistant &
moderately
susceptible
Powdery mildew
Resistant
Between susceptible
Susceptible
& highly susceptible
Verticillium wilt
Susceptible
Moderately
Moderately
Susceptible
resistant
Strawberry mottle
Moderately
Moderately resistant
Moderately
virus
resistant
resistant
Xanthomonas
Moderately
Moderately resistant
Moderately
fragariae
Susceptible
Susceptible
Amorao, Amado Q., Mowrey, Bruce D., Madesko, Martin P., Coss, JoAnne F., Ferguson, Michael
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
ER1136, | |||
ER1281, | |||
ER1840, | |||
ER1902, | |||
ER1967, | |||
ER2330, | |||
ER2362, | |||
ER2487, | |||
ER2617, | |||
ER2850, | |||
ER2853, | |||
ER2995, | |||
ER2996, | |||
ER313, | |||
ER3157, | |||
ER3345, | |||
ER367, | |||
ER3795, | |||
ER3852, | |||
ER3927, | |||
ER4121, | |||
ER4280, | |||
ER4296, | |||
ER4472, | |||
ER5037, | |||
ER51, | |||
ER5256, | |||
ER5406, | |||
ER5882, | |||
ER6311, | |||
ER6331, | |||
ER6770, | |||
ER6873, | |||
ER7167, | |||
ER7221, | |||
ER7256, | |||
ER7494, | |||
ER7669, | |||
ER778, | |||
ER7959, | |||
ER8, | |||
ER8071, | |||
ER8327, | |||
ER8550, | |||
ER8608, | |||
ER8655, | |||
ER8731, | |||
ER9427, | |||
ER9485, | |||
ER9635, | |||
ER964, | |||
ER9757, | |||
ER9999, | |||
PP19673, | Jun 21 2007 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawThree’ |
PP27645, | Mar 06 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’ |
PP27682, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’ |
PP27711, | Apr 10 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’ |
PP27813, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’ |
PP29289, | Mar 25 2016 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’ |
PP29728, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’ |
PP29729, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’ |
PP29730, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’ |
PP29731, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’ |
PP29747, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’ |
PP29748, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’ |
PP29749, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’ |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Nov 16 2006 | FERGUSON, MICHAEL | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 018708 | /0847 | |
Nov 16 2006 | AMORAO, AMADO Q | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 018708 | /0847 | |
Nov 20 2006 | MOWREY, BRUCE D | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 018708 | /0847 | |
Nov 20 2006 | COSS, JOANNE F | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 018708 | /0847 | |
Nov 20 2006 | MADESKO, MARTIN P | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 018708 | /0847 | |
Nov 22 2006 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Dec 23 2010 | DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC , | AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | GRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST | 025525 | /0237 | |
Sep 30 2016 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | DRISCOLL S, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 040727 | /0308 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |