This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawTwo’. The new cultivar is primarily characterized by its large fruit size, heavy fruit production, and resistance to powdery mildew.

Patent
   PP18878
Priority
Nov 22 2006
Filed
Nov 22 2006
Issued
Jun 03 2008
Expiry
Dec 02 2026
Extension
10 days
Assg.orig
Entity
unknown
66
0
n/a
1. A new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant as described and shown herein.

Genus and species: Fragaria×ananassa.

Variety denomination: ‘DrisStrawTwo’.

The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar designated ‘DrisStrawTwo’ and botanically known as Fragaria×ananassa. This new strawberry cultivar originated from a controlled cross between ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 14,771) and ‘Driscoll Marin’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,375). The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated by stolons at a nursery in Shasta County, Calif. Propagules were transplanted to a controlled breeding plot in Ventura County, Calif. where it was identified and selected for further evaluation in October, 2002. ‘DrisStrawTwo’ was subsequently asexually propagated and underwent further testing at various locations in Monterey County, Calif. for four years. The present invention has been found to retain its distinctive characteristics through successive asexual propagations.

The accompanying color photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions.

FIG. 1 shows overall plant habit including fruit at various stages of development.

FIG. 2 shows leaves of the plant with three leaflets.

FIG. 3 shows both the upperside and underside of several of the flowers.

FIG. 4 shows the whole fruit.

FIG. 5 shows the fruit in longitudinal cross-section.

The following description of a 10 month old plant ‘DrisStrawTwo’ is based on observations taken during the 2006 growing season in Monterey County, Calif. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. ‘DrisStrawTwo’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. Color terminology follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London (R.H.S.) (2001).

Table 1 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the parents, ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Driscoll Marin’. Plant characteristics include plant habit, vigor, leaf shape in cross section, fruit length in centimeters, yield in grams per plant and reaction to powdery mildew.

TABLE 1
‘Driscoll
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTwo’ ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ Marin’
Habit Flat globose Globose Flat
Vigor Medium Medium Weak
Leaf shape in Flat Concave Slightly
cross section concave
Powdery Resistant Between susceptible & Moderately
mildew highly susceptible susceptible

Table 2 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,145). Leaf characteristics include terminal leaflet length and width in centimeters, length to width ratio, number of teeth per terminal leaflet, shape of teeth, color of upperside and underside of leaf, leaf shape in cross section, leaf blistering, leaf glossiness, number of leaflets, shape of leaf margin and shape of leaf base.

TABLE 2
Leaf ‘Driscoll
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTwo’ Camarillo’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’
Terminal leaflet 0.76 0.71 0.76
length (cm)
Terminal leaflet 0.71 0.75 0.74
width (cm)
Terminal leaflet 1.06 0.95 1.02
length/width ratio
No. teeth/terminal 20 23 21
leaflet
Shape of teeth Obtuse Rounded Rounded
Color of RHS 147A RHS 147A RHS 139A
upperside of leaf Dark yellow green Dark yellow Dark green
green
Color of RHS 147B RHS 138B RHS 138B
underside of leaf Dark yellow green Dark green Dark green
Leaf shape in Flat Concave Between slightly
cross section concave & flat
Leaf blistering Strong Very strong Medium
Leaf glossiness Medium Between Weak
medium &
strong
No. leaflets Three only Three only Three only
Terminal leaflet Between revolute Between Between revolute
margin & flat revolute & & flat
flat
Terminal leaflet Rounded Rounded Rounded
base shape

Table 3 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract, and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’. This includes petiole length in centimeters, petiole diameter in centimeters, petiolule length in centimeters, petiolule diameter in centimeters, bract frequency per petiole, stipule length in centimeters, stipule width in centimeters, stipule pubescence, petiole pubescence, pose of hairs on the petiole, color of the petiole and color of the petiolule.

TABLE 3
‘Driscoll ‘Driscoll
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTwo’ Camarillo’ Lanai’
Petiole length (cm) 18.8 16.8 18.3
Petiole diameter 0.286 0.331 0.260
(cm)
Petiole pubescence Dense Sparse Medium
Petiole pose of hairs Outwards Outwards Downwards
Petiole color RHS 145A RHS 149A RHS 145A
Medium yellow Light yellow Medium yellow
green green green
Petiolule color RHS 145B RHS 144B RHS 145A
Medium yellow Medium yellow Medium yellow
green green green
Petiolule length 1.590 1.376 1.308
(cm)
Petiolule diameter 0.185 0.194 0.148
(cm)
Bract frequency 0 0 0
Stipule length (cm) 3.8 4.0 3.3
Stipule width (cm) 0.794 0.866 0.550
Stipule pubescence Sparse Sparse Between
medium &
dense

Table 4 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’. These characteristics include the number of stolons, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, the pubescence of the stolons, and the average number of daughter plants.

TABLE 4
‘Driscoll ‘Driscoll
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTwo’ Camarillo’ Lanai’
Stolon Number Medium Medium Many
Stolon Anthocyanin Strong Medium Strong
Stolon Thickness Thin Between Between
Medium & Medium &
Thick Thick
Stolon Pubescence Sparse Medium Dense
Average Number of
Daughter Plants (Nursery 17 N/A 67
Average)

Table 5 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’. These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, relative flower size, flower diameter in centimeters (measured from petal tip to petal tip), relative spacing of petals, petal length in centimeters, petal width in centimeters, petal length to width ratio, petal color, calyx diameter in centimeters (measured on back of flower from sepal tip to sepal tip), diameter of calyx relative to corolla, diameter of inner calyx relative to outer, sepal length in centimeters (measured from sepal tip to point of attachment to receptacle), sepal width in centimeters, receptacle color and anther color.

TABLE 5
‘Driscoll ‘Driscoll
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTwo’ Camarillo’ Lanai’
Inflorescence Above Above Between level
position relative to with & above
foliage
Flower size Medium Medium Medium
Flower diameter 2.549 2.698 2.518
(cm)
Petal spacing Overlapping Overlapping Overlapping
Petal length (cm) 1.156 1.275 1.103
Petal width (cm) 1.197 1.367 1.146
Petal length/width 0.97 0.93 0.96
ratio
Petal color RHS 155D RHS 155B RHS 155C
White White White
Calyx diameter (cm) 3.260 3.236 3.469
Calyx diameter Larger Between Between same
relative to corolla smaller & size & larger
same size
Inner calyx diameter Between same Same size Larger
relative to outer size & larger
Sepal length (cm) 1.108 1.118 1.187
Sepal width (cm) 0.608 0.709 0.630
Receptacle color RHS 2A RHS 1A RHS 1B
Yellow Green yellow Green yellow
Anther color RHS 15B RHS 17A RHS 9A
Yellow orange Yellow orange Yellow orange

Table 6 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’.

TABLE 6
‘Driscoll ‘Driscoll
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTwo’ Camarillo’ Lanai’
Fruiting truss length 31.6 27.6 24.0
(cm)
Fruiting truss Prostrate Prostrate Prostrate
attitude
Fruit length (cm) 4.51 3.59 3.63
Fruit width (cm) 3.59 3.29 3.48
Fruit length/width 1.26 1.09 1.04
ratio
Fruit weight (g) 24.7 20.6 24.2
Relative fruit size Large Between Medium
medium & large
Predominant fruit Conical Cordate Between
shape conical &
ovoid
Difference in shape Moderate Slight Slight
between primary &
secondary fruits
Band without Medium Absent or very Between
achenes narrow narrow &
medium
Unevenness of fruit Absent or very Weak Weak
surface weak
Fruit skin color RHS 45A RHS 46A RHS 45B
Red Red Orange red
Evenness of fruit Even Even Even
color
Fruit glossiness Strong Strong Strong
Insertion of achenes Between level Below surface Level with
with surface & surface
above surface
Achene coloration - RHS 179A RHS 184B RHS 185B
sunward side of Greyed red Greyed purple Greyed
berry purple
Achene coloration - RHS 3A RHS 13B RHS 154B
shaded side of berry Yellow Yellow Yellow
green
Achenes per berry 233.7 224 226.8
Insertion of calyx Set above fruit In a basin Level
Pose of calyx Between Reflexed Between
segments spreading & spreading &
reflexed reflexed
Size of calyx in Smaller Smaller Smaller
relation to fruit
Adherence of calyx Medium Strong Strong
Firmness of flesh Firm Firm Medium
Evenness of flesh Even Slightly uneven Uneven
color
Color of flesh RHS 44C & RHS RHS 34B & RHS 47C
155B RHS 155A Orange red
Orange red & Orange red &
white white
Hollow center Absent Between absent Medium
& small
Sweetness Medium Medium Medium
Texture when tasted Medium Medium Fine
Harvest maturity Mid-season Between early Late
& mid-season
Type of bearing Fully everbearing Fully Partially
everbearing everbearing
Grams of fruit/plant 1,654.7 1,485.1 1,420.4

Table 7 shows pest and disease characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’.

TABLE 7
‘Driscoll
Pest or Disease ‘DrisStrawTwo’ ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ Lanai’
Tetranychus Susceptible Moderately Susceptible
urticae (2-spotted Susceptible
spider mite)
Lygus hesperus Susceptible Susceptible Susceptible
(Lygus bug)
Botrytis fruit rot Moderately Between moderately Susceptible
Susceptible resistant &
moderately
susceptible
Powdery mildew Resistant Between susceptible Susceptible
& highly susceptible
Verticillium wilt Susceptible Moderately Moderately
Susceptible resistant
Strawberry mottle Moderately Moderately resistant Moderately
virus resistant resistant
Xanthomonas Moderately Moderately resistant Moderately
fragariae Susceptible Susceptible

Amorao, Amado Q., Mowrey, Bruce D., Madesko, Martin P., Coss, JoAnne F., Ferguson, Michael

Patent Priority Assignee Title
ER1136,
ER1281,
ER1840,
ER1902,
ER1967,
ER2330,
ER2362,
ER2487,
ER2617,
ER2850,
ER2853,
ER2995,
ER2996,
ER313,
ER3157,
ER3345,
ER367,
ER3795,
ER3852,
ER3927,
ER4121,
ER4280,
ER4296,
ER4472,
ER5037,
ER51,
ER5256,
ER5406,
ER5882,
ER6311,
ER6331,
ER6770,
ER6873,
ER7167,
ER7221,
ER7256,
ER7494,
ER7669,
ER778,
ER7959,
ER8,
ER8071,
ER8327,
ER8550,
ER8608,
ER8655,
ER8731,
ER9427,
ER9485,
ER9635,
ER964,
ER9757,
ER9999,
PP19673, Jun 21 2007 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawThree’
PP27645, Mar 06 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’
PP27682, Jul 15 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’
PP27711, Apr 10 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’
PP27813, Jul 15 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’
PP29289, Mar 25 2016 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’
PP29728, Jun 06 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’
PP29729, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’
PP29730, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’
PP29731, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’
PP29747, Jun 27 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’
PP29748, Jun 27 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’
PP29749, Jun 06 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’
Patent Priority Assignee Title
////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Nov 16 2006FERGUSON, MICHAELDriscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0187080847 pdf
Nov 16 2006AMORAO, AMADO Q Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0187080847 pdf
Nov 20 2006MOWREY, BRUCE D Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0187080847 pdf
Nov 20 2006COSS, JOANNE F Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0187080847 pdf
Nov 20 2006MADESKO, MARTIN P Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0187080847 pdf
Nov 22 2006Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Dec 23 2010DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC ,AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST0255250237 pdf
Sep 30 2016Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncDRISCOLL S, INC CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0407270308 pdf
n/a
Date Maintenance Fee Events


n/a
Date Maintenance Schedule