This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawThree’. The new cultivar is primarily characterized by its large fruit size, heavy fruit production, and resistance to powdery mildew.

Patent
   PP19673
Priority
Jun 21 2007
Filed
Jun 21 2007
Issued
Feb 03 2009
Expiry
Aug 07 2027
Extension
47 days
Assg.orig
Entity
unknown
65
4
n/a
1. A new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant as described and shown herein.

Genus and species: Fragaria×ananassa.

Variety denomination: ‘DrisStrawThree’.

The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar designated ‘DrisStrawThree’ and botanically known as Fragaria×ananassa. This new strawberry cultivar was discovered in October, 2002 and originated from a cross between the female parent ‘5F205’, a proprietary strawberry plant (unpatented) and the male parent ‘San Juan’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 12,899). The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated at a nursery in Shasta County, Calif. ‘DrisStrawThree’ was subsequently asexually propagated and underwent further testing at a nursery in Ventura County, Calif. for four years. The present invention has been found to retain its distinctive characteristics through successive asexual propagations.

The accompanying color photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions.

FIG. 1 shows overall plant habit including fruit at various stages of development.

FIG. 2 shows leaves of the plant with three leaflets.

FIG. 3 shows both the upperside and underside of several of the flowers.

FIG. 4 shows the whole fruit.

FIG. 5 shows the fruit in longitudinal cross-section.

The following description of ‘DrisStrawThree’ is based on observations taken from the 2002 to 2006 growing seasons in Ventura County, Calif. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. ‘DrisStrawThree’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. Color terminology follows the Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London (R.H.S.) (2001).

Table 1 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the parent ‘San Juan’. Plant characteristics include plant height, leaf shape in cross section, fruit hollow center, fruit texture when tasted, and reaction to aphids.

TABLE 1
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawThree’ ‘San Juan’
Plant height (cm) 20.5 28.0
Leaf shape in Slightly concave Flat to slightly
cross convex
Fruit hollow center Small Medium
Fruit texture when Very fine Medium
tasted
Aphis spp. Moderately Susceptible
(Aphids) resistant

Table 2 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the commercial varieties, ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 14,771) and ‘Baeza’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,548). Plant characteristics include plant height, diameter, number of crowns per plant, habit, density of individual plant and vigor.

TABLE 2
‘Driscoll
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawThree’ Camarillo’ ‘Baeza’
Plant height 20.5 23.3 22.4
(cm)
Plant diameter 45.1 43.9 44.7
(cm)
Number of 4 3 3
crowns/plant
Habit Flat globose Globose Globose
Density of Dense Medium to Dense Medium to Dense
individual plant
Vigor Strong Strong Medium

Table 3 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’. Leaf characteristics include terminal leaflet length and width in centimeters, length to width ratio, number of teeth per terminal leaflet, shape of teeth, color of upperside and underside of leaf, leaf shape in cross section, leaf blistering, leaf glossiness, number of leaflets, leaflet margin, and shape of leaf base.

TABLE 3
Leaf ‘Driscoll
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawThree’ Camarillo’ ‘Baeza’
Terminal 0.82 0.90 0.83
leaflet length (cm)
Terminal 0.80 0.97 0.91
leaflet width (cm)
Terminal leaflet 1.04 0.93 0.91
length/width ratio
No. teeth/ 17 27 29
terminal leaflet
Shape of teeth Rounded Rounded Rounded
Color of RHS 139A RHS N189B RHS 147A
upperside of leaf
Color of RHS 191B RHS 137C RHS 137C
underside of leaf
Leaf shape in Slightly concave Slightly concave Concave
cross section
Leaf blistering Weak Medium Medium
Leaf glossiness Weak Weak Weak
No. leaflets Three only Three only Three only
Terminal Revolute Revolute Revolute
leaflet margin
Terminal Obtuse Rounded Rounded
leaflet base shape

Table 4 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract, and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’. This includes petiole length in centimeters, petiole diameter in centimeters, petiolule length in centimeters, petiolule diameter in centimeters, bract frequency per petiole, stipule length in centimeters, stipule width in centimeters, stipule pubescence, petiole pubescence, pose of hairs on the petiole, color of the petiole and color of the petiolule.

TABLE 4
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawThree’ ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ ‘Baeza’
Petiole length 14.1 12.7 13.4
(cm)
Petiole diameter 0.412 0.408 0.420
(cm)
Petiole Dense Sparse Medium to
pubescence dense
Petiole pose of Outward to Outwards Outwards
hairs downward
Petiole color RHS 144B RHS 144B RHS 144B
Petiolule color RHS 145B RHS 145B RHS 145B
Petiolule length 1.098 1.255 1.456
(cm)
Petiolule diameter 0.236 0.254 0.232
(cm)
Bract frequency 1 1 1
Stipule length 3.8 4.0 3.7
(cm)
Stipule width 0.985 1.070 1.256
(cm)
Stipule Dense Sparse Sparse
pubescence

Table 5 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’. These characteristics include the number of stolons, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, and the pubescence of the stolons.

TABLE 5
‘Driscoll
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawThree’ Camarillo’ ‘Baeza’
Stolon Number Few to medium Few to medium Few to
medium
Stolon Anthocyanin Strong Weak to medium Weak to
medium
Stolon Thickness Medium Thick Thick
to very thick
Stolon Pubescence Sparse Sparse Medium to
dense

Table 6 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’. These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, relative flower size, flower diameter in centimeters (measured from petal tip to petal tip), relative spacing of petals, petal length in centimeters, petal width in centimeters, petal length to width ratio, petal color, calyx diameter in centimeters (measured on back of flower from sepal tip to sepal tip), diameter of calyx relative to corolla, diameter of inner calyx relative to outer, sepal length in centimeters (measured from sepal tip to point of attachment to receptacle), sepal width in centimeters, receptacle color and anther color.

TABLE 6
‘Driscoll
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawThree’ Camarillo’ ‘Baeza’
Inflorescence Beneath Above Above
position relative to
foliage
Flower size Medium Medium Medium
Flower diameter 3.001 2.263 2.490
(cm)
Petal spacing Overlapping Overlapping Overlapping
Petal length (cm) 1.502 1.262 1.496
Petal width (cm) 1.531 1.263 1.511
Petal length/width 0.98 1.00 0.99
ratio
Petal color RHS 155B RHS 155C RHS 155B
Calyx diameter (cm) 4.088 2.550 2.925
Calyx diameter Larger Smaller Same size
relative to corolla
Inner calyx diameter Same size Same size Same size
relative to outer
Sepal length (cm) 1.582 0.964 1.087
Sepal width (cm) 0.817 0.544 0.505
Receptacle color RHS N144A RHS 2B RHS 1A
Anther color RHS 17A RHS 15B RHS 17B

Table 7 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’.

TABLE 7
‘Driscoll
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawThree’ Camarillo’ ‘Baeza’
Fruiting truss 13.4 26.5 21.7
length (cm)
Fruiting truss Prostrate Erect Erect
attitude
Fruiting truss Medium Long Long
length
Fruit length 4.93 3.76 4.35
(cm)
Fruit width 4.36 3.73 3.92
(cm)
Fruit length/ 1.13 1.01 1.11
width ratio
Fruit weight (g) 27.5 21.0 22.3
Relative fruit Very large Medium Medium
size
Predominant Almost Conical Conical
fruit shape cylindrical
Difference in Slight None or very None or very
shape between slight slight
primary &
secondary
fruits
Band without Narrow Absent or very Absent or very
achenes narrow narrow
Unevenness of Medium Medium Medium
fruit surface
Fruit skin color RHS 45B RHS 46A RHS 46B
Red Red Red
Evenness of Uneven Even Even
fruit color
Fruit glossiness Medium Medium Medium
Insertion of Level with Level with Level with
achenes surface surface surface
Achene RHS 165A RHS 166B RHS 163B
coloration- Red to purple, Red to purple, Red to purple,
sunward side of possibly greyed possibly greyed possibly greyed
berry
Achene RHS 151C yellow RHS 151C RHS 151A
coloration- to green yellow to green Yellow to green
shaded side of
berry
Achenes per 243.6 316.2 361.3
berry
Achene weight 0.000664409 0.000570367 0.000466731
Insertion of Set above the Level Level
calyx fruit
Pose of calyx Reflexed Reflexed Reflexed
segments
Size of calyx in Smaller to larger Same size Same size
relation to fruit
Adherence of Strong Strong Strong
calyx
Firmness of Firm Firm Firm
flesh
Color of the RHS 155A RHS 155A RHS 155A
flesh (White) to RHS (White) to RHS (White) to RHS
44D (light red) 44D (light red) 38B (pale rose)
Evenness of Slightly uneven Even Even
flesh color
Distribution of Marginal and Only marginal Only marginal
flesh color central
Hollow center Small Absent Medium
Sweetness Strong Medium Medium
Acidity Weak Medium Medium
Texture when Very fine Medium Medium
tasted
Time of Early Early Late
flowering
Harvest Mid-season, early Mid-season, Late
maturity June to late early June to early July to late
December late December December
Type of Fully everbearing Fully Fully
bearing everbearing everbearing
Grams of 500 286 289
fruit/plant

Table 8 shows the resistance to different forms of stress of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’. These forms of stress include drought, high temperatures, wind, high pH, and high soil salt level.

TABLE 8
Reaction to ‘Driscoll
Stress ‘DrisStrawThree’ Camarillo’ ‘Baeza’
Drought Moderately Moderately Moderately
resistant resistant resistant
High temperatures Moderately Moderately Moderately
resistant resistant resistant
Wind Moderately Moderately Moderately
resistant resistant resistant
High pH Moderately Moderately Moderately
resistant resistant resistant
High soil salt level Moderately Moderately Susceptible
resistant resistant

Table 9 shows pest and disease characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’.

TABLE 9
‘Driscoll
Pest or Disease ‘DrisStrawThree’ Camarillo’ ‘Baeza’
Tetranychus urticae Moderately Moderately Moderately
(2-spotted spider resistant resistant resistant
mite)
Tarsonemus pallidus Moderately Moderately Moderately
resistant resistant resistant
Aphelencoides Moderately Moderately Moderately
fragariae resistant resistant resistant
Pratylenchus Moderately Moderately Moderately
penetrans resistant resistant resistant
Ditylenchus dipsac Moderately Moderately Moderately
resistant resistant resistant
Anthonomus rubi Moderately Moderately Moderately
resistant resistant resistant
Aphis spp. (Aphids) Moderately Moderately Moderately
resistant resistant resistant
Lygus hesperus Moderately Moderately Moderately
(Lygus bug) resistant resistant resistant
Botrytis fruit rot Moderately Moderately Moderately
Susceptible Susceptible Susceptible
Powdery mildew Resistant Highly Susceptible
susceptible

Mowrey, Bruce D., Ferguson, Michael D.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
ER1136,
ER1281,
ER1840,
ER1902,
ER1967,
ER2330,
ER2362,
ER2487,
ER2617,
ER2850,
ER2853,
ER2995,
ER2996,
ER313,
ER3157,
ER3345,
ER367,
ER3795,
ER3852,
ER3927,
ER4121,
ER4280,
ER4296,
ER4472,
ER5037,
ER51,
ER5256,
ER5406,
ER5882,
ER6311,
ER6331,
ER6770,
ER6873,
ER7167,
ER7221,
ER7256,
ER7494,
ER7669,
ER778,
ER7959,
ER8,
ER8071,
ER8327,
ER8550,
ER8608,
ER8655,
ER8731,
ER9427,
ER9485,
ER9635,
ER964,
ER9757,
ER9999,
PP27645, Mar 06 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’
PP27682, Jul 15 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’
PP27711, Apr 10 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’
PP27813, Jul 15 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’
PP29289, Mar 25 2016 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’
PP29728, Jun 06 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’
PP29729, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’
PP29730, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’
PP29731, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’
PP29747, Jun 27 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’
PP29748, Jun 27 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’
PP29749, Jun 06 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’
Patent Priority Assignee Title
PP11548, May 19 1997 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named `Baeza`
PP12889, Oct 31 2000 KERRY S BROMELIAD NURSERY, INC Spathiphyllum plant named `Florida Beauty`
PP14771, Feb 15 2002 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named `Driscoll Camarillo`
PP18878, Nov 22 2006 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawTwo’
/////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jun 20 2007FERGUSON, MICHAELDriscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0197690692 pdf
Jun 20 2007MOWREY, BRUCE D Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0197690692 pdf
Jun 21 2007Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Dec 23 2010DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC ,AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST0255250237 pdf
Sep 30 2016Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncDRISCOLL S, INC CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0407310220 pdf
n/a
Date Maintenance Fee Events


n/a
Date Maintenance Schedule