This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawThree’. The new cultivar is primarily characterized by its large fruit size, heavy fruit production, and resistance to powdery mildew.
|
|
Genus and species: Fragaria×ananassa.
Variety denomination: ‘DrisStrawThree’.
The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar designated ‘DrisStrawThree’ and botanically known as Fragaria×ananassa. This new strawberry cultivar was discovered in October, 2002 and originated from a cross between the female parent ‘5F205’, a proprietary strawberry plant (unpatented) and the male parent ‘San Juan’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 12,899). The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated at a nursery in Shasta County, Calif. ‘DrisStrawThree’ was subsequently asexually propagated and underwent further testing at a nursery in Ventura County, Calif. for four years. The present invention has been found to retain its distinctive characteristics through successive asexual propagations.
The accompanying color photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions.
The following description of ‘DrisStrawThree’ is based on observations taken from the 2002 to 2006 growing seasons in Ventura County, Calif. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. ‘DrisStrawThree’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. Color terminology follows the Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London (R.H.S.) (2001).
Table 1 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the parent ‘San Juan’. Plant characteristics include plant height, leaf shape in cross section, fruit hollow center, fruit texture when tasted, and reaction to aphids.
TABLE 1
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawThree’
‘San Juan’
Plant height (cm)
20.5
28.0
Leaf shape in
Slightly concave
Flat to slightly
cross
convex
Fruit hollow center
Small
Medium
Fruit texture when
Very fine
Medium
tasted
Aphis spp.
Moderately
Susceptible
(Aphids)
resistant
Table 2 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the commercial varieties, ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 14,771) and ‘Baeza’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,548). Plant characteristics include plant height, diameter, number of crowns per plant, habit, density of individual plant and vigor.
TABLE 2
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawThree’
Camarillo’
‘Baeza’
Plant height
20.5
23.3
22.4
(cm)
Plant diameter
45.1
43.9
44.7
(cm)
Number of
4
3
3
crowns/plant
Habit
Flat globose
Globose
Globose
Density of
Dense
Medium to Dense
Medium to Dense
individual plant
Vigor
Strong
Strong
Medium
Table 3 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’. Leaf characteristics include terminal leaflet length and width in centimeters, length to width ratio, number of teeth per terminal leaflet, shape of teeth, color of upperside and underside of leaf, leaf shape in cross section, leaf blistering, leaf glossiness, number of leaflets, leaflet margin, and shape of leaf base.
TABLE 3
Leaf
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawThree’
Camarillo’
‘Baeza’
Terminal
0.82
0.90
0.83
leaflet length (cm)
Terminal
0.80
0.97
0.91
leaflet width (cm)
Terminal leaflet
1.04
0.93
0.91
length/width ratio
No. teeth/
17
27
29
terminal leaflet
Shape of teeth
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
Color of
RHS 139A
RHS N189B
RHS 147A
upperside of leaf
Color of
RHS 191B
RHS 137C
RHS 137C
underside of leaf
Leaf shape in
Slightly concave
Slightly concave
Concave
cross section
Leaf blistering
Weak
Medium
Medium
Leaf glossiness
Weak
Weak
Weak
No. leaflets
Three only
Three only
Three only
Terminal
Revolute
Revolute
Revolute
leaflet margin
Terminal
Obtuse
Rounded
Rounded
leaflet base shape
Table 4 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract, and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’. This includes petiole length in centimeters, petiole diameter in centimeters, petiolule length in centimeters, petiolule diameter in centimeters, bract frequency per petiole, stipule length in centimeters, stipule width in centimeters, stipule pubescence, petiole pubescence, pose of hairs on the petiole, color of the petiole and color of the petiolule.
TABLE 4
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawThree’
‘Driscoll Camarillo’
‘Baeza’
Petiole length
14.1
12.7
13.4
(cm)
Petiole diameter
0.412
0.408
0.420
(cm)
Petiole
Dense
Sparse
Medium to
pubescence
dense
Petiole pose of
Outward to
Outwards
Outwards
hairs
downward
Petiole color
RHS 144B
RHS 144B
RHS 144B
Petiolule color
RHS 145B
RHS 145B
RHS 145B
Petiolule length
1.098
1.255
1.456
(cm)
Petiolule diameter
0.236
0.254
0.232
(cm)
Bract frequency
1
1
1
Stipule length
3.8
4.0
3.7
(cm)
Stipule width
0.985
1.070
1.256
(cm)
Stipule
Dense
Sparse
Sparse
pubescence
Table 5 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’. These characteristics include the number of stolons, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, and the pubescence of the stolons.
TABLE 5
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawThree’
Camarillo’
‘Baeza’
Stolon Number
Few to medium
Few to medium
Few to
medium
Stolon Anthocyanin
Strong
Weak to medium
Weak to
medium
Stolon Thickness
Medium
Thick
Thick
to very thick
Stolon Pubescence
Sparse
Sparse
Medium to
dense
Table 6 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’. These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, relative flower size, flower diameter in centimeters (measured from petal tip to petal tip), relative spacing of petals, petal length in centimeters, petal width in centimeters, petal length to width ratio, petal color, calyx diameter in centimeters (measured on back of flower from sepal tip to sepal tip), diameter of calyx relative to corolla, diameter of inner calyx relative to outer, sepal length in centimeters (measured from sepal tip to point of attachment to receptacle), sepal width in centimeters, receptacle color and anther color.
TABLE 6
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawThree’
Camarillo’
‘Baeza’
Inflorescence
Beneath
Above
Above
position relative to
foliage
Flower size
Medium
Medium
Medium
Flower diameter
3.001
2.263
2.490
(cm)
Petal spacing
Overlapping
Overlapping
Overlapping
Petal length (cm)
1.502
1.262
1.496
Petal width (cm)
1.531
1.263
1.511
Petal length/width
0.98
1.00
0.99
ratio
Petal color
RHS 155B
RHS 155C
RHS 155B
Calyx diameter (cm)
4.088
2.550
2.925
Calyx diameter
Larger
Smaller
Same size
relative to corolla
Inner calyx diameter
Same size
Same size
Same size
relative to outer
Sepal length (cm)
1.582
0.964
1.087
Sepal width (cm)
0.817
0.544
0.505
Receptacle color
RHS N144A
RHS 2B
RHS 1A
Anther color
RHS 17A
RHS 15B
RHS 17B
Table 7 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’.
TABLE 7
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawThree’
Camarillo’
‘Baeza’
Fruiting truss
13.4
26.5
21.7
length (cm)
Fruiting truss
Prostrate
Erect
Erect
attitude
Fruiting truss
Medium
Long
Long
length
Fruit length
4.93
3.76
4.35
(cm)
Fruit width
4.36
3.73
3.92
(cm)
Fruit length/
1.13
1.01
1.11
width ratio
Fruit weight (g)
27.5
21.0
22.3
Relative fruit
Very large
Medium
Medium
size
Predominant
Almost
Conical
Conical
fruit shape
cylindrical
Difference in
Slight
None or very
None or very
shape between
slight
slight
primary &
secondary
fruits
Band without
Narrow
Absent or very
Absent or very
achenes
narrow
narrow
Unevenness of
Medium
Medium
Medium
fruit surface
Fruit skin color
RHS 45B
RHS 46A
RHS 46B
Red
Red
Red
Evenness of
Uneven
Even
Even
fruit color
Fruit glossiness
Medium
Medium
Medium
Insertion of
Level with
Level with
Level with
achenes
surface
surface
surface
Achene
RHS 165A
RHS 166B
RHS 163B
coloration-
Red to purple,
Red to purple,
Red to purple,
sunward side of
possibly greyed
possibly greyed
possibly greyed
berry
Achene
RHS 151C yellow
RHS 151C
RHS 151A
coloration-
to green
yellow to green
Yellow to green
shaded side of
berry
Achenes per
243.6
316.2
361.3
berry
Achene weight
0.000664409
0.000570367
0.000466731
Insertion of
Set above the
Level
Level
calyx
fruit
Pose of calyx
Reflexed
Reflexed
Reflexed
segments
Size of calyx in
Smaller to larger
Same size
Same size
relation to fruit
Adherence of
Strong
Strong
Strong
calyx
Firmness of
Firm
Firm
Firm
flesh
Color of the
RHS 155A
RHS 155A
RHS 155A
flesh
(White) to RHS
(White) to RHS
(White) to RHS
44D (light red)
44D (light red)
38B (pale rose)
Evenness of
Slightly uneven
Even
Even
flesh color
Distribution of
Marginal and
Only marginal
Only marginal
flesh color
central
Hollow center
Small
Absent
Medium
Sweetness
Strong
Medium
Medium
Acidity
Weak
Medium
Medium
Texture when
Very fine
Medium
Medium
tasted
Time of
Early
Early
Late
flowering
Harvest
Mid-season, early
Mid-season,
Late
maturity
June to late
early June to
early July to late
December
late December
December
Type of
Fully everbearing
Fully
Fully
bearing
everbearing
everbearing
Grams of
500
286
289
fruit/plant
Table 8 shows the resistance to different forms of stress of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’. These forms of stress include drought, high temperatures, wind, high pH, and high soil salt level.
TABLE 8
Reaction to
‘Driscoll
Stress
‘DrisStrawThree’
Camarillo’
‘Baeza’
Drought
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
resistant
resistant
resistant
High temperatures
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
resistant
resistant
resistant
Wind
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
resistant
resistant
resistant
High pH
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
resistant
resistant
resistant
High soil salt level
Moderately
Moderately
Susceptible
resistant
resistant
Table 9 shows pest and disease characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’.
TABLE 9
‘Driscoll
Pest or Disease
‘DrisStrawThree’
Camarillo’
‘Baeza’
Tetranychus urticae
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
(2-spotted spider
resistant
resistant
resistant
mite)
Tarsonemus pallidus
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
resistant
resistant
resistant
Aphelencoides
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
fragariae
resistant
resistant
resistant
Pratylenchus
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
penetrans
resistant
resistant
resistant
Ditylenchus dipsac
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
resistant
resistant
resistant
Anthonomus rubi
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
resistant
resistant
resistant
Aphis spp. (Aphids)
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
resistant
resistant
resistant
Lygus hesperus
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
(Lygus bug)
resistant
resistant
resistant
Botrytis fruit rot
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
Susceptible
Susceptible
Susceptible
Powdery mildew
Resistant
Highly
Susceptible
susceptible
Mowrey, Bruce D., Ferguson, Michael D.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
ER1136, | |||
ER1281, | |||
ER1840, | |||
ER1902, | |||
ER1967, | |||
ER2330, | |||
ER2362, | |||
ER2487, | |||
ER2617, | |||
ER2850, | |||
ER2853, | |||
ER2995, | |||
ER2996, | |||
ER313, | |||
ER3157, | |||
ER3345, | |||
ER367, | |||
ER3795, | |||
ER3852, | |||
ER3927, | |||
ER4121, | |||
ER4280, | |||
ER4296, | |||
ER4472, | |||
ER5037, | |||
ER51, | |||
ER5256, | |||
ER5406, | |||
ER5882, | |||
ER6311, | |||
ER6331, | |||
ER6770, | |||
ER6873, | |||
ER7167, | |||
ER7221, | |||
ER7256, | |||
ER7494, | |||
ER7669, | |||
ER778, | |||
ER7959, | |||
ER8, | |||
ER8071, | |||
ER8327, | |||
ER8550, | |||
ER8608, | |||
ER8655, | |||
ER8731, | |||
ER9427, | |||
ER9485, | |||
ER9635, | |||
ER964, | |||
ER9757, | |||
ER9999, | |||
PP27645, | Mar 06 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’ |
PP27682, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’ |
PP27711, | Apr 10 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’ |
PP27813, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’ |
PP29289, | Mar 25 2016 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’ |
PP29728, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’ |
PP29729, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’ |
PP29730, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’ |
PP29731, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’ |
PP29747, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’ |
PP29748, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’ |
PP29749, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’ |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
PP11548, | May 19 1997 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named `Baeza` |
PP12889, | Oct 31 2000 | KERRY S BROMELIAD NURSERY, INC | Spathiphyllum plant named `Florida Beauty` |
PP14771, | Feb 15 2002 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named `Driscoll Camarillo` |
PP18878, | Nov 22 2006 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawTwo’ |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jun 20 2007 | FERGUSON, MICHAEL | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019769 | /0692 | |
Jun 20 2007 | MOWREY, BRUCE D | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019769 | /0692 | |
Jun 21 2007 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Dec 23 2010 | DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC , | AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | GRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST | 025525 | /0237 | |
Sep 30 2016 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | DRISCOLL S, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 040731 | /0220 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |