`Camarosa` is a short-day (June bearing) cultivar similar to `Chandler` (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 5,262) but with greater total productivity, substantially greater early productivitiy, larger fruit, firmer fruit, and is a more vigorous plant.

Patent
   PP8708
Priority
Apr 01 1993
Filed
Apr 01 1993
Issued
May 03 1994
Expiry
Apr 01 2013
Assg.orig
Entity
unknown
75
0
n/a
1. The new and distinct variety of strawberry plant illustrated and described and having the characteristics above enumerated.

This invention relates to a new and distinctive short-day type cultivar designated as `Camarosa`, which resulted from a cross performed in 1988 between the cultivar `Douglas` (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 4,487) and advanced selection Cal 85.218-605.

`Camarosa` was first fruited at the University of California South Coast Research and Extension Center, near Irvine, Calif. in 1989, where it was selected, originally designated Cal 88.24-603, and propagated asexually by runners. Asexual propagules from this original source have been tested at the South Coast Research and Extension Center, the Watsonville Strawberry Research Facility, and to a limited extent in grower fields starting in 1990.

In the Drawings:

FIG. 1 shows the general flowering and fruiting characteristics of the plant;

FIG. 2 shows a typical mature leaf during late spring; and

FIG. 3 shows representative mid-season fruit.

`Camarosa` is typical of short-day types and produces fruit over an extended period when treated appropriately in arid, subtropical climates. `Camarosa` has a substantially greater yield than `Douglas` and greater fruit firmness. The production pattern for `Camarosa` is similar to that for `Chandler` (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 5,262), although it produces substantially greater quantities of early-season fruit. `Camarosa` will be of special interest for winter plantings, where `Chandler` has been successful, and in summer plantings where `Pajaro` (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 4,538) has been successful.

Fruiting plants of `Camarosa` are larger, more erect, and more vigorous than plants of `Chandler`, and are generally similar in form to plants of `Oso Grande` (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 6,578). `Camarosa` forms branch crowns in greater quantity than `Chandler` with similar branching to `Oso Grande`. When propagated in the nursery, `Camarosa` has similar or greater runner production capacity compared with `Chandler`. Comparative statistics for foliar characters, including leaf color, near mid-season are given for the three cultivars in Table 1, with visual comparisons of leaf color to the Munsell color scale (Nickerson Color Fan) given in Table 5. Leaf color is distinctly lighter on the underside for `Camarosa`; the differential is similar to that for `Chandler` and not as large as for `Oso Grande`. Individual leaflets for `Camarosa` are larger, somewhat longer and more narrow than for `Chandler`, and are less rounded than for `Oso Grande`. Leaves (including petioles) are similar in length to `Chandler`, but are much broader. Petioles are thicker and more stiff than those of `Chandler` and are similar to those of `Oso Grande`. Paired stipules, borne in a median position on the petiole, appear as small, stalked, ovate to heart-shaped structures on some leaves for `Camarosa` and on most leaves for the comparison cultivars. Stipule size varies greatly both within and among individual plants for `Camarosa`, and one or both stipules are frequently absent or may abscise as the leaf matures. Leaf and petiole pubescence characters for `Camarosa` are similar to those for `Oso Grande`, except that tomentum on leaves are less dense. Also, leaves for `Camarosa` are similar in reflectance to `Chandler` but darker green (less yellow), and similar in color intensity to `Oso Grande`. Visual comparisons of fruit color according to the Munsell color scale (Nickerson Color Fan) are given in Table 5. `Camarosa` has concave leaves; less concave than leaves of `Chandler`, and similar to those of `Oso Grande` .

`Camarosa` has been classified for three isozyme systems using starch gel electrophoresis (Table 2): Phosophoglucoisomerase (PGI), Leucine Aminopeptidase (LAP), and Phosphoglucomutase (PGM). It is distinguishable from all other short-day cultivars released to date. For electrophoretic procedures see: J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106:684-687.

`Camarosa` is moderately susceptible to common leaf spot (Ramularia tulasnei) and relatively resistant to powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca macularis). When treated properly, it has equal or greater tolerance to two-spotted spidermites (Tetranychus urticae) than `Chandler`. `Camarosa` is tolerant to strawberry viruses encountered in California.

TABLE 1
______________________________________
Foliar characteristics for
`Camarosa`, `Chandler`, and `Oso Grande`.
Cultivar
Foliar Character
`Camarosa` `Chandler` `Oso Grande`
______________________________________
Mid-tier leaflet
Length (mm)
mean 97.4 82.4 77.2
range 80-117 78-94 75-80
Width (mm)
mean 79.8 71.4 67.6
range 70-92 63-88 62-71
Mid-tier leaf
Length (mm)
mean 234.2 244.2 191.6
range 210-253 218-262 170-200
Width (mm)
mean 143.6 148.0 137.2
range 135-180 132-158 130-149
Leaf color
(CIELAB)*
L*
mean 31.5 31.4 31.9
range 28.4-34.5 27.1-33.3 29.9-33.0
a*
mean -5.9 -8.0 -5.3
range -3.1--9.4 -5.2--8.2 -4.2--8.3
b*
mean 14.0 16.0 15.5
range 11.1-20.7 12.9-21.4 12.5-20.6
# leaflets/leaf
3 3 3
Leaf convexity
concave concave concave
Serrations
number few many moderate
shape semi-round semi-pointed
semi-round
Leaf pubescence
moderate moderate/ moderate/
sparse heavy
Petiole pubescence
density heavy heavy heavy
direction perpendicular
acropetal perpendicular
______________________________________
*CIELAB is the abbreviation of the international color system known as
"Commission Internationale De L'Eclairage" 1978. Recommendations on
uniform color spaces - color difference equations, psychometric color
terms, Supplement No. 2 to CIE Publication No. 15. PARIS.
TABLE 2
______________________________________
Isozyme phenotypes for
`Camarosa`, `Chandler`, and `Oso Grande`.
Cultivar
Locus `Camarosa` `Chandler`
`Oso Grande`
______________________________________
PGI A2 A1 A2
LAP B3 B3 B3
PGM C1 C1 C2
______________________________________

Comparative statistics for flower and fruit characters, including fruit color, near mid-season are given for the three cultivars in Table 3. The primary flowers for `Camarosa` are similar in size to `Chandler` and `Oso Grande`, whereas the sepals are somewhat larger than for the comparison cultivars. The calyx for `Camarosa` varies from slightly indented to slightly necked, and each primary flower has 5-6 petals. The fruit shape for `Camarosa` can vary but is typically a very flat conic, and is easily distinguished from `Chandler` (flat conic, with some long conic) and `Oso Grande` (rounded or blocky conic). External fruit color for `Camarosa` is similar to `Chandler` and `Oso Grande,` and the fruit is at least as glossy as `Chandler`; internal color is darker than for `Chandler` and substantially darker than for `Oso Grande`. Achenes vary from light red to dark red, and are even with the fruit surface or slightly indented.

`Camarosa` has been tested under a variety of cultural regimes, and optimal performance is obtained when nursery treatments, preplant chilling regimes, plant densities, and nutritional programs similar to those that optimize performance for `Chandler` are used. In general, `Camarosa` is more adapted to early-season planting with less supplemental chilling than `Chandler`.

When treated with appropriate planting regimes, `Camarosa` has larger fruit and produces greater yields than `Chandler` (Table 4); `Camarosa` has greater yield but smaller fruit than `Oso Grande`. `Camarosa` is similar to `Chandler` and `Oso Grande` in its production pattern, although it produces substantially more early-season fruit than either comparison cultivar (with conventional winter planting). Commercial appearance ratings have been comparable to or better than those for `Chandler`. Fruit for `Camarosa` is substantially firmer than fruit from `Chandler`; `Camarosa` is about as firm as `Oso Grande`. Subjectively, `Camarosa` has very good flavor, somewhat less aromatic than `Chandler`, but with better acid balance and more aromatic components than `Oso Grande`. The fruit will be outstanding for both fresh market and processing, due to its firm flesh and very dark internal color, and will be useful for home garden purposes.

TABLE 3
______________________________________
Flower and fruit characters for
`Camarosa`, `Chandler`, and `Oso Grande`.
Cultivar
Character `Camarosa`
`Chandler`
`Oso Grande`
______________________________________
# petals
mean 6.3 6.6 5.0
range 5-7 6-8 5-5
Flower position
even/ even/ exposed
(relative to foliage)
exposed exposed
Calyx diam. (mm)
mean 57.1 47.7 34.1
range 50-63 45-53 27-38
Corolla diam. (mm)
mean 39.3 39.3 32.2
range 35-42 36-46 27-41
Fruit shape
length/width 1.13 1.33 1.06
ratio
subjective flat/ flat conic
blocky/conic
some conic
Calyx position
even/slight
even/slight
even/slight
indent neck indent
Seed position even/slight
even/slight
even
indent indent
Fruit color (CIELAB)
external
L* 23.1 23.6 22.4
a* 29.7 38.5 31.2
b* 16.6 14.8 17.2
internal
L* 43.6 46.2 54.1
a* 40.8 39.1 30.4
b* 30.9 29.4 22.7
______________________________________
TABLE 4
______________________________________
Performance for selection `Camarosa` compared with `Oso
Grande` and `Chandler` at the South Coast Research and
Extension Center in 1991. All plants were dug from the South
Coast nursery on October 1 and planted October 2 (68"/4-row
beds, 23,061 plants/A, 100 g/plant = 425 Crates/A).
Yield Total Appear-
To 4/1 Yield Size ance Firm-
(g/plant)
(g/plant)
(g/fruit)
Score ness
______________________________________
`Camarosa`
555 2,380 24.6 4.4 4.7
`Chandler`
463 1,738 23.3 3.9 4.0
`Oso Grande`
530 1,675 25.0 3.8 4.9
______________________________________
TABLE 5
______________________________________
Munsell color classification for leaf and fruit characters.
Munsell Leaf Color Classes
Munsell Fruit
Upper Lower Color Classes
Item (Adaxial) (Abaxial) External
Internal
______________________________________
Chandler
5GY 4/3 5GY 5/6 5R 5/13 7R 5/13
5GY 5/6 5R 4/12
Oso 5GY 4/3 5GY 5/6 5R 5/13 7.5R 7/9
5GY 3/2 7.5GY 6/8 7.5R 5/13
7.5R 6/12
Camarosa
5GY 4/3 5GY 5/6 7.5R 4/11
7.5R 5/13
7.5R 3/6
7.5R 4/11
______________________________________

Shaw, Douglas V., Voth, Victor, Bringhurst, Royce S.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
ER1136,
ER1281,
ER1840,
ER1902,
ER1967,
ER2330,
ER2362,
ER2487,
ER2617,
ER2850,
ER2853,
ER2995,
ER2996,
ER313,
ER3157,
ER3345,
ER367,
ER3795,
ER3852,
ER3927,
ER4121,
ER4280,
ER4296,
ER4472,
ER5037,
ER51,
ER5256,
ER5406,
ER5882,
ER6311,
ER6331,
ER6770,
ER6873,
ER7167,
ER7221,
ER7256,
ER7494,
ER7669,
ER778,
ER7959,
ER8,
ER8071,
ER8327,
ER8550,
ER8608,
ER8655,
ER8731,
ER9427,
ER9485,
ER9635,
ER964,
ER9757,
ER9999,
PP12221, Oct 07 1998 Calfifornia Giant, Inc. Strawberry plant named `Cal Giant 2`
PP12403, Aug 24 1999 CALIFORNIA GIANT, INC Strawberry plant named `Cal Giant 3`
PP12423, May 02 2000 California Giant, Inc. Strawberry plant named `Cal Giant 4`
PP16766, May 27 2003 State of Queensland Through Its Department of Primary Industries Strawberry plant named ‘QHI Sugarbaby’
PP22542, Jan 29 2010 The Regents of the University of California Strawberry plant named ‘Benicia’
PP22589, Jan 29 2010 The Regents of the University of California Strawberry plant named ‘Mojave’
PP22717, Dec 01 2008 Edward Vinson Limited Strawberry plant named ‘Viva Patricia’
PP25223, Jan 22 2013 The United States of America, as represented by The Secretary of Agriculture Strawberry plant named ‘Sweet Sunrise’
PP25300, Jan 22 2013 The United States of America, as represented by The Secretary of Agriculture Strawberry plant named ‘Charm’
PP27645, Mar 06 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’
PP27682, Jul 15 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’
PP27711, Apr 10 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’
PP27813, Jul 15 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’
PP29289, Mar 25 2016 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’
PP29728, Jun 06 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’
PP29729, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’
PP29730, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’
PP29731, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’
PP29747, Jun 27 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’
PP29748, Jun 27 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’
PP29749, Jun 06 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’
PP9320, Aug 23 1994 Strawberry plant named `Catalina`
Patent Priority Assignee Title
/
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Apr 01 1993The Regents of the University of California(assignment on the face of the patent)
n/a
Date Maintenance Fee Events


n/a
Date Maintenance Schedule