This invention relates to new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘Charm’. The new cultivar is primarily characterized by it medium-large fruit that have outstanding processing characteristics including deep red internal and external color, sweet flavor, and very easy calyx removal, as well as vigorous, productive plants.
|
|
Latin name of the genus and species of the plant claimed: ‘CHARM’ is a new strawberry plant that is Fragaria xananassa Duchesne ex Rozier.
Variety denomination: The new strawberry plant claimed is of the variety denominated ‘Charm’ Fragaria xananassa Duchesne ex Rozier.
The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar strawberry designated ‘Charm’ and botanically known as Fragaria xananassa Duchesne ex Rozier. This new strawberry cultivar was discovered in Corvallis, Oreg. in June 2001 and originated from a cross between the female parent BC 91-14-31 (unpatented) and the male parent WA 94023-1 (unpatented). The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated in Benton County Oregon since 2001 by rooting daughter plants from stolons from the mother plant. The present invention has been found to be stable and reproduce true to type through successive asexual propagations.
The accompanying color photographs show typical specimen's of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions.
The following description of ‘Charm’ is based on observations taken from 2004 to 2012 growing seasons in trials in Corvallis and Aurora, Oreg. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. ‘Charm’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. The botanical description of ‘Charm’ was taken from plants one year after establishment in the field. Color terminology follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour chart. London (R.H.S.) (5th edition, 2007).
Table 1 shows selected characteristics of the new cultivar compared with plant characteristics of ‘SWEET SUNRISE’, (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 13/694,950). Characteristics include plant height, number of crowns per plant, plant habit, bract frequency, petiole texture, petal length and width, fruit shape, and fruit weight.
TABLE 1
Characteristic
‘Charm’
‘Sweet Sunrise’
Plant height (cm)
20.0
11.9
Number of crowns/plant
11.0
6.2
Habit
Upright globose
Upright, open globose
Bract frequency
None
Typically two
Texture petiole
Hirsute
Dense
Petal length (cm)
1.0
1.4
Petal width (cm)
1.0
1.3
Fruit shape
Conic, slight wedge
Conic
Weight fruit (g)
14.6
15.4
Table 2 shows plant characteristics of the new cultivar compared with plant characteristics of ‘Sweet Sunrise’, (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 13/694,950). Plant characteristics include plant height, diameter, number of crowns per plant, habit, density of individual plants and vigor.
TABLE 2
Characteristic
‘Charm’
‘Sweet Sunrise’
Plant height (cm)
20.0
11.9
Plant diameter (cm)
34.7
25.0
Number of crowns/plant
11.0
6.2
Habit
Upright globose
Upright, open globose
Density of individual plant
Medium to Dense
Medium
Vigor
Strong
Medium
Table 3 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘Sweet Sunrise’, (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 13/364,950). Leaf characteristics include leaf type, leaf shape. leaf length, leaf width, terminal leaflet length, terminal leaflet width, terminal leaflet length to width ratio, leaf margins, shape of teeth, leaf serrations per leaflet, upper and lower leaf surface color, number of leaflets, terminal leaflet apex shape, terminal leaflet base shape, glossiness upper side leaf surface, texture upper side leaf surface, texture underside leaf surface and leaf arrangement.
TABLE 3
Characteristic
‘Charm’
‘Sweet Sunrise’
Leaf type
Semi-evergreen leaves
Semi-evergreen leaves
that die back to the
that die back to the
ground in severe winters
ground in severe winters
Leaf shape
Ovate
Ovate
Leaf length (cm)
6.98
7.94
Leaf width (cm)
6.53
6.76
Terminal leaflet length
7.87
7.72
(cm)
Terminal leaflet width
6.93
6.27
(cm)
Terminal leaflet
1.1
1.2
length/width ratio
Leaf margins
Serrate
Single serration,
coarsely serrate
Shape of teeth
Rounded
Pointed
Leaf serrations per
20.3
21.7
leaflet
Color mature leaves
Green Group N 137B
Green Group N 137A
upper surface
Color mature leaves
Green Group N138C
Green Group 138C
lower surface
Number of leaflets
3
3
Terminal leaflet apex
Obtuse
Obtuse
shape
Terminal leaflet base
Cuneate
Cuneate
shape
Glossiness upper side
Semi-gloss
Semi-gloss
leaf surface
Texture upper side leaf
Very lightly tomentose
Very lightly tomentose
surface
Texture underside leaf
Tomentulose
Tomentulose
surface
Leaf arrangement
Compound with three
Compound with three
leaflets
leaflets
Table 4 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘Sweet Sunrise’, (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 13/694,950). This includes petiole length, petiole diameter, petiole pubescence, petiole color, petiolule color, petiolule length, bract frequency, texture petiole, stipule length, and stipule width.
TABLE 4
Characteristic
‘Charm’
‘Sweet Sunrise’
Leaf petiole length (cm)
18.0
10.8
Petiole diameter (cm)
0.26
0.27
Petiole pubescence
Hirsute
Dense
Petiole color
144C
144C
Petiolule color
144C
144C
Petiolule length (cm)
1.11
1.17
Bract frequency
None
Typically two
Texture petiole
Hirsute
Dense
Stipule length (cm)
1.96
2.51
Stipule width (cm)
1.01
1.24
Table 5 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Sweet Sunrise’, (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 13/694,950). These characteristics include the number of stolons, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, and the pubescence of the stolons.
TABLE 5
Characteristic
‘Charm’
‘Sweet Sunrise’
Stolon number
13.5
6.0
Stolon anthocyanin
Weak
Between weak and medium
Stolon thickness (cm)
0.26
0.25
Stolon pubescence
Sparse to medium
Sparse
Table 6 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Sweet Sunrise’, (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 13/694,950). These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, flower type, flower size, petal shape, relative petal spacing, petal apex shape, petal margin, petal base shape, petal length, petal width, petal length/width ratio, number of petals, petal color, stigma color, style color, anther color, filament color, and flower truss type.
TABLE 6
Characteristic
‘Charm’
‘Sweet Sunrise’
Inflorescence position
Between level with and
Between level with
above
and above
Flower type
Complete simple
Complete simple
Flower diameter (cm)
2.7
2.7
Petal shape
Orbicular
Orbicular
Petal spacing
Overlapping
Overlapping
Petal apex shape
Rounded
Rounded
Petal margin
Entire
Entire
Petal base shape
Rounded
Rounded
Petal length (cm)
1.00
1.43
Petal width (cm)
1.00
1.31
Petal length/width ratio
1.0
1.1
Petal count
5.1
5.4
Petal color
White Group NN155C
White Group NN 155B
Stigma color
Green-Yellow Group 1B
Yellow Group 13A
Style color
Green-Yellow Group 1B
Yellow Group 13A
Anther color
Yellow-Orange Group
Yellow-Orange Group
14A
14A
Filament color
Yellow-Orange Group
Yellow-Orange Group
14D
14A
Blooming habit
Cyme
Cyme
Table 7 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Sweet Sunshine’ (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 13/694,650). These characteristics include number of berries per truss, fruiting truss attitude, fruit length, fruit diameter, fruit length/width ratio, fruit weight, relative fruit size, predominant fruit shape, difference in shape between primary and secondary fruit, band without achenes, evenness of fruit surface, top color, non-blush side color, blush side color, internal color, achene color, achene count per fruit, insertion of calyx, pose of calyx segments, size of calyx in relation to fruit, ease of calyx removal, firmness of flesh, evenness of flesh color, distribution of flesh color, sweetness, acidity, Brix, pH, titratable acidity, texture when tasted, time of flowering, harvest maturity (50% of plants with ripe fruit), type of bearing, and yield.
TABLE 7
Characteristic
‘Charm’
‘Sweet Sunrise’
Number of berries per
6.8
5.2
fruiting truss
Fruiting truss attitude
Between prostrate and
Between erect and
semi-erect
semi-erect
Diameter fruit (cm)
3.50
2.93
Length fruit (cm)
4.30
3.23
Ratio fruit length/width
1.2
1.1
Weight fruit (g)
14.6
15.4
Relative fruit size
Medium
Medium-large
Predominant fruit shape
Conic, slight wedge
Conic
Difference in shape between
Slight
Slight
primary and secondary fruits
Band without achenes
Absent or very narrow
Very narrow
Evenness of fruit surface
Very even
Even
Color of top of fruit
Red Group 53A
Red Group 53A
Non-blush side color
Red Group 53A
Red Group 53A
Blush side color
Red Group 53A
Red Group 53A
Internal flesh color
Red Group 47A
Red Group 47A
(mostly uniform,
(mostly uniform)
slightly open core)
Achene color
Red Group 53B
Red Group 53A
Achene count
216
278
Insertion of calyx
Level
Level
Pose of calyx segments
Spreading
Spreading to reflexed
Size of calyx in relation
Between same size
Smaller
to fruit
and smaller
Ease of calyx removal
Very easy
Easy
Firmness of flesh
Medium
Firm
Evenness of flesh color
Even
Even
Distribution of flesh color
Throughout
Throughout
Sweetness
Strong
Strong
Acidity
Medium
Medium
Brix (percent soluble solids)
7.65
8.27
pH
3.43
3.56
Titratable acidity (g citric
9.45
7.65
acid/100 g fruit)
Texture when tasted
Fine
Fine
Time of flowering
First bloom mid-late
Begins late April
April, ends early-mid
early May, ends
June
early-mid June
Harvest maturity (50%
Mid-June
Early June
of plant with ripe fruit)
Type of bearing
Short-day/June-
Short-day/June-
bearing
bearing
Yield (kg/hectare)
38063
34455
When ‘Charm’ is compared to female parent BC 9114-31 (unpatented), the fruit are less firm and brighter colored and the plants less susceptible to foliar disease. When ‘Charm’ is compared to the male parent WA 94023-1 (unpatented) the fruit are darker and firmer and the plants more productive.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
PP10191, | Aug 20 1996 | Regents of the University of Minnesota | Strawberry plant called `MNUS 210` |
PP10402, | Aug 28 1996 | NATIONAL LICENSING ASSOCIATION-US L,L,C | Strawberry plant variety named Darselect |
PP10460, | Apr 22 1996 | McGill University | `Joliette` strawberry |
PP10960, | Dec 01 1997 | Plantas de Navarra S.A. | Strawberry plant named `Tudnew` |
PP11277, | May 19 1997 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named `Captiva` |
PP12067, | Dec 14 1998 | Washington State University Research Foundation | Strawberry plant named `Schwartze` |
PP16228, | Jan 29 2004 | CALIFORNIA, UNIVERSITY OF THE REGENTS OF THE; REGENTS OF THE UNIVERISITY OF CALIFORNIA, THE | Strawberry plant named ‘Albion’ |
PP16480, | Jun 21 2004 | Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. | Strawberry plant named ‘L'Amour’ |
PP16571, | Jun 21 2004 | Cornell Research Foundation Inc. | Strawberry plant named ‘Clancy’ |
PP17404, | Apr 08 2004 | Regents of the University of Minnesota; The United States of America as represented by the Department of Agriculture | Strawberry plant named ‘MNUS 138’ |
PP19472, | Jan 16 2007 | The Regents of the University of California | Strawberry plant named ‘Palomar’ |
PP22589, | Jan 29 2010 | The Regents of the University of California | Strawberry plant named ‘Mojave’ |
PP22781, | Feb 03 2011 | Washington State University | Strawberry plant named ‘Puget Crimson’ |
PP8346, | Dec 11 1991 | Coast Cooling, Inc.; Plant Sciences, Inc. | Strawberry plant named `PSI 308` |
PP8649, | Mar 02 1993 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. | Strawberry plant called `Key Largo` |
PP8659, | Apr 01 1993 | The Regents of the University of California | Strawberry plant called Anaheim |
PP8660, | Apr 01 1993 | The Regents of the University of California | Strawberry plant called "Carlsbad" |
PP8662, | Apr 01 1993 | The Regents of the University of California | Strawberry plant called `Cuesta` |
PP8663, | Apr 01 1993 | The Regents of the University of California | Strawberry plant named `Laguna` |
PP8708, | Apr 01 1993 | The Regents of the University of California | Strawberry plant called `Camarosa` |
PP8745, | Mar 25 1993 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. | Strawberry plant called `Avila` |
PP8853, | Jul 13 1992 | McGill University | June-bearing strawberry named Chambly |
PP8970, | Dec 15 1993 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. | Strawberry plant called `X13` |
PP9130, | Aug 03 1994 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. | Strawberry plant called `Balboa` |
PP9310, | Sep 12 1994 | Washington State University Research Foundation | Strawberry plant `Puget Reliance` |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 16 2013 | FINN, CHAD E | AGRICULTURE, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 029844 | /0790 | |
Jan 22 2013 | The United States of America, as represented by The Secretary of Agriculture | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |