This invention relates to new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘Charm’. The new cultivar is primarily characterized by it medium-large fruit that have outstanding processing characteristics including deep red internal and external color, sweet flavor, and very easy calyx removal, as well as vigorous, productive plants.

Patent
   PP25300
Priority
Jan 22 2013
Filed
Jan 22 2013
Issued
Feb 24 2015
Expiry
Jan 22 2033
Assg.orig
Entity
unknown
0
25
n/a
1. A new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant as described and illustrated herein.

Latin name of the genus and species of the plant claimed: ‘CHARM’ is a new strawberry plant that is Fragaria xananassa Duchesne ex Rozier.

Variety denomination: The new strawberry plant claimed is of the variety denominated ‘Charm’ Fragaria xananassa Duchesne ex Rozier.

The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar strawberry designated ‘Charm’ and botanically known as Fragaria xananassa Duchesne ex Rozier. This new strawberry cultivar was discovered in Corvallis, Oreg. in June 2001 and originated from a cross between the female parent BC 91-14-31 (unpatented) and the male parent WA 94023-1 (unpatented). The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated in Benton County Oregon since 2001 by rooting daughter plants from stolons from the mother plant. The present invention has been found to be stable and reproduce true to type through successive asexual propagations.

The accompanying color photographs show typical specimen's of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions.

FIG. 1 shows overall plant habit.

FIG. 2 shows the flower morphology.

FIG. 3 shows a flower truss with fruit in a range of ripening stages.

FIG. 4 shows typical fruit after harvest for processing market.

FIG. 5 shows typical entire and sliced fruit after freezing and thawing.

The following description of ‘Charm’ is based on observations taken from 2004 to 2012 growing seasons in trials in Corvallis and Aurora, Oreg. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. ‘Charm’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. The botanical description of ‘Charm’ was taken from plants one year after establishment in the field. Color terminology follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour chart. London (R.H.S.) (5th edition, 2007).

Table 1 shows selected characteristics of the new cultivar compared with plant characteristics of ‘SWEET SUNRISE’, (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 13/694,950). Characteristics include plant height, number of crowns per plant, plant habit, bract frequency, petiole texture, petal length and width, fruit shape, and fruit weight.

TABLE 1
Characteristic ‘Charm’ ‘Sweet Sunrise’
Plant height (cm) 20.0 11.9
Number of crowns/plant 11.0 6.2
Habit Upright globose Upright, open globose
Bract frequency None Typically two
Texture petiole Hirsute Dense
Petal length (cm) 1.0 1.4
Petal width (cm) 1.0 1.3
Fruit shape Conic, slight wedge Conic
Weight fruit (g) 14.6 15.4

Table 2 shows plant characteristics of the new cultivar compared with plant characteristics of ‘Sweet Sunrise’, (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 13/694,950). Plant characteristics include plant height, diameter, number of crowns per plant, habit, density of individual plants and vigor.

TABLE 2
Characteristic ‘Charm’ ‘Sweet Sunrise’
Plant height (cm) 20.0 11.9
Plant diameter (cm) 34.7 25.0
Number of crowns/plant 11.0 6.2
Habit Upright globose Upright, open globose
Density of individual plant Medium to Dense Medium
Vigor Strong Medium

Table 3 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘Sweet Sunrise’, (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 13/364,950). Leaf characteristics include leaf type, leaf shape. leaf length, leaf width, terminal leaflet length, terminal leaflet width, terminal leaflet length to width ratio, leaf margins, shape of teeth, leaf serrations per leaflet, upper and lower leaf surface color, number of leaflets, terminal leaflet apex shape, terminal leaflet base shape, glossiness upper side leaf surface, texture upper side leaf surface, texture underside leaf surface and leaf arrangement.

TABLE 3
Characteristic ‘Charm’ ‘Sweet Sunrise’
Leaf type Semi-evergreen leaves Semi-evergreen leaves
that die back to the that die back to the
ground in severe winters ground in severe winters
Leaf shape Ovate Ovate
Leaf length (cm) 6.98 7.94
Leaf width (cm) 6.53 6.76
Terminal leaflet length 7.87 7.72
(cm)
Terminal leaflet width 6.93 6.27
(cm)
Terminal leaflet 1.1 1.2
length/width ratio
Leaf margins Serrate Single serration,
coarsely serrate
Shape of teeth Rounded Pointed
Leaf serrations per 20.3 21.7
leaflet
Color mature leaves Green Group N 137B Green Group N 137A
upper surface
Color mature leaves Green Group N138C Green Group 138C
lower surface
Number of leaflets 3 3
Terminal leaflet apex Obtuse Obtuse
shape
Terminal leaflet base Cuneate Cuneate
shape
Glossiness upper side Semi-gloss Semi-gloss
leaf surface
Texture upper side leaf Very lightly tomentose Very lightly tomentose
surface
Texture underside leaf Tomentulose Tomentulose
surface
Leaf arrangement Compound with three Compound with three
leaflets leaflets

Table 4 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘Sweet Sunrise’, (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 13/694,950). This includes petiole length, petiole diameter, petiole pubescence, petiole color, petiolule color, petiolule length, bract frequency, texture petiole, stipule length, and stipule width.

TABLE 4
Characteristic ‘Charm’ ‘Sweet Sunrise’
Leaf petiole length (cm) 18.0 10.8
Petiole diameter (cm) 0.26 0.27
Petiole pubescence Hirsute Dense
Petiole color 144C 144C
Petiolule color 144C 144C
Petiolule length (cm) 1.11 1.17
Bract frequency None Typically two
Texture petiole Hirsute Dense
Stipule length (cm) 1.96 2.51
Stipule width (cm) 1.01 1.24

Table 5 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Sweet Sunrise’, (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 13/694,950). These characteristics include the number of stolons, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, and the pubescence of the stolons.

TABLE 5
Characteristic ‘Charm’ ‘Sweet Sunrise’
Stolon number 13.5 6.0
Stolon anthocyanin Weak Between weak and medium
Stolon thickness (cm) 0.26 0.25
Stolon pubescence Sparse to medium Sparse

Table 6 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Sweet Sunrise’, (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 13/694,950). These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, flower type, flower size, petal shape, relative petal spacing, petal apex shape, petal margin, petal base shape, petal length, petal width, petal length/width ratio, number of petals, petal color, stigma color, style color, anther color, filament color, and flower truss type.

TABLE 6
Characteristic ‘Charm’ ‘Sweet Sunrise’
Inflorescence position Between level with and Between level with
above and above
Flower type Complete simple Complete simple
Flower diameter (cm) 2.7 2.7
Petal shape Orbicular Orbicular
Petal spacing Overlapping Overlapping
Petal apex shape Rounded Rounded
Petal margin Entire Entire
Petal base shape Rounded Rounded
Petal length (cm) 1.00 1.43
Petal width (cm) 1.00 1.31
Petal length/width ratio 1.0 1.1
Petal count 5.1 5.4
Petal color White Group NN155C White Group NN 155B
Stigma color Green-Yellow Group 1B Yellow Group 13A
Style color Green-Yellow Group 1B Yellow Group 13A
Anther color Yellow-Orange Group Yellow-Orange Group
14A 14A
Filament color Yellow-Orange Group Yellow-Orange Group
14D 14A
Blooming habit Cyme Cyme

Table 7 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Sweet Sunshine’ (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 13/694,650). These characteristics include number of berries per truss, fruiting truss attitude, fruit length, fruit diameter, fruit length/width ratio, fruit weight, relative fruit size, predominant fruit shape, difference in shape between primary and secondary fruit, band without achenes, evenness of fruit surface, top color, non-blush side color, blush side color, internal color, achene color, achene count per fruit, insertion of calyx, pose of calyx segments, size of calyx in relation to fruit, ease of calyx removal, firmness of flesh, evenness of flesh color, distribution of flesh color, sweetness, acidity, Brix, pH, titratable acidity, texture when tasted, time of flowering, harvest maturity (50% of plants with ripe fruit), type of bearing, and yield.

TABLE 7
Characteristic ‘Charm’ ‘Sweet Sunrise’
Number of berries per 6.8 5.2
fruiting truss
Fruiting truss attitude Between prostrate and Between erect and
semi-erect semi-erect
Diameter fruit (cm) 3.50 2.93
Length fruit (cm) 4.30 3.23
Ratio fruit length/width 1.2 1.1
Weight fruit (g) 14.6 15.4
Relative fruit size Medium Medium-large
Predominant fruit shape Conic, slight wedge Conic
Difference in shape between Slight Slight
primary and secondary fruits
Band without achenes Absent or very narrow Very narrow
Evenness of fruit surface Very even Even
Color of top of fruit Red Group 53A Red Group 53A
Non-blush side color Red Group 53A Red Group 53A
Blush side color Red Group 53A Red Group 53A
Internal flesh color Red Group 47A Red Group 47A
(mostly uniform, (mostly uniform)
slightly open core)
Achene color Red Group 53B Red Group 53A
Achene count 216 278
Insertion of calyx Level Level
Pose of calyx segments Spreading Spreading to reflexed
Size of calyx in relation Between same size Smaller
to fruit and smaller
Ease of calyx removal Very easy Easy
Firmness of flesh Medium Firm
Evenness of flesh color Even Even
Distribution of flesh color Throughout Throughout
Sweetness Strong Strong
Acidity Medium Medium
Brix (percent soluble solids) 7.65 8.27
pH 3.43 3.56
Titratable acidity (g citric 9.45 7.65
acid/100 g fruit)
Texture when tasted Fine Fine
Time of flowering First bloom mid-late Begins late April
April, ends early-mid early May, ends
June early-mid June
Harvest maturity (50% Mid-June Early June
of plant with ripe fruit)
Type of bearing Short-day/June- Short-day/June-
bearing bearing
Yield (kg/hectare) 38063 34455

When ‘Charm’ is compared to female parent BC 9114-31 (unpatented), the fruit are less firm and brighter colored and the plants less susceptible to foliar disease. When ‘Charm’ is compared to the male parent WA 94023-1 (unpatented) the fruit are darker and firmer and the plants more productive.

Finn, Chad E

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
PP10191, Aug 20 1996 Regents of the University of Minnesota Strawberry plant called `MNUS 210`
PP10402, Aug 28 1996 NATIONAL LICENSING ASSOCIATION-US L,L,C Strawberry plant variety named Darselect
PP10460, Apr 22 1996 McGill University `Joliette` strawberry
PP10960, Dec 01 1997 Plantas de Navarra S.A. Strawberry plant named `Tudnew`
PP11277, May 19 1997 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named `Captiva`
PP12067, Dec 14 1998 Washington State University Research Foundation Strawberry plant named `Schwartze`
PP16228, Jan 29 2004 CALIFORNIA, UNIVERSITY OF THE REGENTS OF THE; REGENTS OF THE UNIVERISITY OF CALIFORNIA, THE Strawberry plant named ‘Albion’
PP16480, Jun 21 2004 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Strawberry plant named ‘L'Amour’
PP16571, Jun 21 2004 Cornell Research Foundation Inc. Strawberry plant named ‘Clancy’
PP17404, Apr 08 2004 Regents of the University of Minnesota; The United States of America as represented by the Department of Agriculture Strawberry plant named ‘MNUS 138’
PP19472, Jan 16 2007 The Regents of the University of California Strawberry plant named ‘Palomar’
PP22589, Jan 29 2010 The Regents of the University of California Strawberry plant named ‘Mojave’
PP22781, Feb 03 2011 Washington State University Strawberry plant named ‘Puget Crimson’
PP8346, Dec 11 1991 Coast Cooling, Inc.; Plant Sciences, Inc. Strawberry plant named `PSI 308`
PP8649, Mar 02 1993 Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. Strawberry plant called `Key Largo`
PP8659, Apr 01 1993 The Regents of the University of California Strawberry plant called Anaheim
PP8660, Apr 01 1993 The Regents of the University of California Strawberry plant called "Carlsbad"
PP8662, Apr 01 1993 The Regents of the University of California Strawberry plant called `Cuesta`
PP8663, Apr 01 1993 The Regents of the University of California Strawberry plant named `Laguna`
PP8708, Apr 01 1993 The Regents of the University of California Strawberry plant called `Camarosa`
PP8745, Mar 25 1993 Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. Strawberry plant called `Avila`
PP8853, Jul 13 1992 McGill University June-bearing strawberry named Chambly
PP8970, Dec 15 1993 Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. Strawberry plant called `X13`
PP9130, Aug 03 1994 Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. Strawberry plant called `Balboa`
PP9310, Sep 12 1994 Washington State University Research Foundation Strawberry plant `Puget Reliance`
//
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jan 16 2013FINN, CHAD E AGRICULTURE, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OFASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0298440790 pdf
Jan 22 2013The United States of America, as represented by The Secretary of Agriculture(assignment on the face of the patent)
n/a
Date Maintenance Fee Events


n/a
Date Maintenance Schedule