A monitoring system includes: (1) an implant having at least one sensor and configured for at least partial insertion into a patient, a first one of sensors being in contact with a perimeter of a hole in a body portion of the implant for accepting a fastener; (2) a microchip associated with the implant and the sensor, the microchip configured to receive at least a first signal from the sensor; (3) a transmitter associated with the microchip for transmitting a second signal, representative of the first signal; (4) a receiver located outside of the patient, the receiver configured receive the transmitted second signal; and (5) a display device associated with the receiver, the display device configured to provide an audible or visual representation of the second signal to a user.
|
0. 23. A method of orthopaedic surgery, comprising:
attaching a spinal fixation member to a bone via a transverse member extending therefrom, the spinal fixation member including a sensor operably connected thereto to monitor the spinal fixation member; and
intraoperatively receiving data from the sensor via a microchip connected to the sensor, the data corresponding to a desired intraoperative adjustment of the spinal fixation member.
1. A method of mending a broken bone, comprising:
affixing a bone fixation implant to first and second portions of the broken bone using a plurality of fasteners, the implant including a microchip and a plurality of sensors arranged on the implant and connected to the microchip, a first one of the sensors being in contact with a perimeter of a hole in a body portion of the implant for accepting a fastener;
collecting data from the sensors by the microchip; and
transmitting the data from the microchip to an external receiving device.
0. 15. A method of orthopaedic surgery, comprising:
attaching an orthopaedic device to a bone using a plurality of fasteners, the orthopedic device including a microchip and a plurality of sensors operably connected to the orthopaedic device to monitor the orthopaedic device, the plurality of sensors being connected to the microchip,
intraoperatively adjusting the orthopaedic device, and
intraoperatively receiving data from the sensors via the microchip, the data corresponding to an adjustment of the orthopaedic device to achieve a desired spatial relationship of bone segments to one another.
0. 19. A method of orthopaedic surgery, comprising:
attaching a first rod of an orthopaedic device along a first side of a first portion of a bone via a first transverse member extending from the first rod, the first rod having a first sensor operably connected thereto;
attaching a second rod of the orthopaedic device along a second side of a second portion of the bone via a second transverse member extending from the second rod, the second rod having a second sensor operably connected thereto;
receiving data via a microchip connected to the first and second sensors; and
providing the data to a user to facilitate intraoperative adjustments to the orthopaedic device by the user.
6. A monitoring system comprising:
an implant having at least one sensor and configured for at least partial insertion into a patient, a first one of sensors being in contact with a perimeter of a hole in a body portion of the implant for accepting a fastener;
a microchip associated with the implant and the sensor, the microchip configured to receive at least a first signal from the sensor;
a transmitter associated with the microchip for transmitting a second signal, representative of the first signal;
a receiver located outside of the patient, the receiver configured receive the transmitted second signal; and
a display device associated with the receiver, the display device configured to provide an audible or visual representation of the second signal to a user.
8. The monitoring system of
10. The monitoring system of
11. The monitoring system of
12. The monitoring system of
13. The monitoring system of
0. 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the bone fixation implant is a bone plate.
0. 16. The method of orthopaedic surgery of claim 15, further comprising the step of:
intraoperatively adjusting the orthopaedic device based on the data from the sensors.
0. 17. The method of orthopaedic surgery of claim 15, wherein the bone segments are vertebrae and the orthopaedic device is a spinal fixation implant comprising a spinal fusion rod assembly.
0. 18. The method of orthopaedic surgery of claim 15, wherein the data is wirelessly transmitted to an external computing device.
0. 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the first portion of bone is a vertebra and the orthopaedic device is a spinal fusion rod assembly.
0. 21. The method of claim 19, wherein the data is configured to facilitate intraoperative adjustments to the orthopaedic device to achieve one of a desired stress, strain and pressure applied to the first portion of bone via the orthopaedic device.
0. 22. The method of claim 19, wherein the data includes one of a stress, strain and pressure applied to the orthopaedic device.
0. 24. The method of claim 23, wherein the spinal fixation member is a spinal fusion rod assembly.
0. 25. The method of claim 23, wherein the spinal fixation member includes two rods configured to be attached to opposing sides of the bone.
0. 26. The method of claim 23, wherein the sensor detects one of stress, strain and pressure applied to the bone.
|
The present application is a Reissue Application of the U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/298,808 filed on Nov. 17, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,551,092; which is a Continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/147,750 filed on Jun. 7, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,083,741, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/578,107, filed Jun. 7, 2004, the entire contents of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference thereto.
The present invention relates to orthopaedic implants, such as bone plates, for use in repairing fractured bones or for addressing other orthopedic conditions. More particularly, the present invention relates to an orthopaedic implant having sensors and/or a microchip for measuring and transmitting data concerning the implant and/or the surrounding tissue to doctors and/or patients.
Bone plates have been used for many years in the field of orthopedics for the repair of broken bones and are well known in the art. One example of such a bone plate is shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,623,486 to Weaver, et al. which is hereby incorporated by reference. Such bone plates function well in most instances, and fracture healing occurs more predictably than if no plate were used. In some instances, however, improper installation, implant failure, infection or other conditions such as patient non-compliance with prescribed post-operative treatment may contribute to compromised healing of the fracture, as well as increased risk to the health of the patient. Health care professionals currently use non-invasive methods such as x-rays to examine fracture healing progress and assess condition of implanted bone plates. However, x-rays may be inadequate for accurate diagnoses. They are costly, and repeated x-rays may be detrimental to the patient's and health care workers' health. In some cases, non-unions of fractures may go clinically undetected until implant failure. Moreover, x-rays may not be used to adequately diagnose soft tissue conditions or stress on the implant. In some instances, invasive procedures are required to diagnose implant failure or infections early enough that appropriate remedial measures may be implemented.
Therefore there is a need for an orthopaedic implant that can provide precise and accurate information to doctors and patients concerning the status of the implant, progress of fracture healing, and the surrounding tissue without the need for x-rays or invasive procedures.
The present invention comprises an orthopaedic implant, e.g., a bone plate, intramedullary nail, etc., for fixation of bone having one or more microchips (i.e., integrated circuits) and various sensors for the gathering of information relating to the implant and its environment.
An implant is provided comprising a body portion configured to contact patient tissue, one or more microchips, and a plurality of sensors arranged on the implant body and connected to said microchip wherein at least one sensor is configured to receive physical stimulus from a portion of the implant or the patient's tissue. The microchip may further comprise a data logger and a power source, such as a battery.
The implant may be a bone plate, bone screw, intramedullary nail, spinal fixation element (pedicle screw, pedicle hook, fixation plate, fixation rod, etc.), intervertebral implant (artificial spinal disc or fusion spacer), distractor, external fixation system or other orthopaedic implant. The implant may have a coating, which may include a polymer or a porous metal, and may act as a carrier or substrate for a pharmaceutically active agent or other therapeutic substance. The implant may also include a compartment for storing a therapeutic agent, such as an antibiotic, a growth factor, a chemotherapeutic agent, etc. The therapeutic agent may be released in response to a signal received by the microchip.
One or more sensors on the implant may be configured and adapted to receive a strain from at least a portion of the implant. The sensors may be configured and adapted to receive a pressure applied to at least a portion of the implant, and/or to receive a temperature of at least a portion of the implant. The sensors may also be configured to capture digital images (video and/or photographs) of the surrounding patient tissue. The sensors may also be configured and adapted to emit an electric current for stimulating bone growth.
The patient tissue may comprise first and second bone portions of a fracture, the implant may further comprise an element configured to apply a micro-motion to the first and second bone ends to facilitate fusion of the fractured portions.
The implant may further comprise a counter for counting a number of loading cycles applied to the implant.
In another embodiment, an implant for the fixation of bone comprises a plurality of holes for accepting fasteners, an onboard microchip comprising a data logger, signal conditioner, multiplexer, and transmitter, and a plurality of sensors connected to the microchip and arranged at various points on said implant, wherein said sensors are configured to receive at least one physical stimulus at a portion of the implant.
One of said sensors may be selected from at least one of the group consisting of a pressure transducer, a thermocouple, a strain gauge and a cycle counter.
In another embodiment, the present invention relates to a method of mending a broken hone, comprising providing a bone fixation implant with a microchip, arranging a plurality of sensors on said implant, connecting said plurality of sensors to said microchip, affixing the implant to first and second portions of the broken bone using a plurality of fasteners, providing data from said sensors to said microchip, and transmitting said data from said microchip to an external receiving device.
In another embodiment, a monitoring system is provided comprising an implant having at least one sensor and configured for at least partial insertion into a patient, a microchip associated with the implant and the sensor, the microchip configured to receive at least a first signal from the sensor, a transmitter associated with the microchip for transmitting a second signal, representative of the first signal, a receiver located outside of the patient, the receiver configured receive the transmitted second signal, and a display device associated with the receiver, the display device configured to provide an audible or visual representation of the second signal to a user. The display device may be further configured to continuously record the transmitted second signal.
The implant may be coated. Such a coating may include a polymer or porous metal, such as magnesium, that can be a carrier or substrate for a pharmaceutically active agent or synthetic agent.
To facilitate an understanding of and for the purpose of illustrating the present invention, exemplary and preferred features and embodiments are disclosed in the accompanying drawings, it being understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown, and wherein similar reference characters denote similar elements throughout the several views, and wherein:
Reference is now made to
Similarly, such implants could also be employed at locations where osteotomies or resections have been performed to monitor bone strength.
In addition, the holes 30 in the bone plate 10 may be threaded to receive screws with threaded heads, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,709,686 to Talos, which is hereby incorporated by reference. The threaded connection between the screw and the plate may serve to lock the screw and plate together so that the screw will not back out of the plate even if the screw shank loses purchase with the surrounding bone, which can occur in patients having substandard bone structure resulting from osteoporosis or other factors. Standard compression screws having no such plate-locking feature may tend to pull out of substandard bone when subjected to the bending forces generated in the plate during post-installation loading. Further, standard compression screws are designed to engage the screw holes of the plate in a manner that forces the fractured bone ends together to aid healing. Thus, where a plate having only compression screws is installed across a fracture site, the bone portions may move slightly in the period following fixation. As a result, the measured strain in the plate during that period may not be truly representative of the true load-bearing capacity of the bone (i.e. it may be unnaturally high). Thus, a strain reading from a sensor on a plate using only compression screws may not provide the surgeon with reliable information regarding early healing of the bone (i.e. in the days or first week following implantation) from which he or she may make a diagnosis regarding whether the fracture is healing properly. Only after the fractured bone portions have settled will strain readings become sufficiently accurate that a proper diagnosis may be made. By contrast, where locking screws (i.e. those having heads that threadably engage the plate holes) are used, there is no period of settling, and thus the strain values observed in the plate will immediately upon implantation be representative of the load carried by the plate (and correspondingly the load carried by the bone). As such, the surgeon may use these early measured strain readings to develop an accurate, early assessment of the fracture healing rate and the potential for not uniting. An early diagnosis of delayed union is advantageous because it allows the surgeon to take remedial steps as soon as a possible non-union is suspected, thus prompting intervention.
As seen in
Thus, the various sensors arranged on the implant may include thermocouples, pressure transducers, force probes, counters, strain gauges, and digital imaging devices. At least one sensor may be used to count the number of loading cycles the implant experiences, including axial, bending and torsional loads. The information gathered from these sensors may be used to diagnose conditions associated with the implant and/or the tissue surrounding the implant.
For example, it may be important to monitor strain at various locations on the implant, since such strain may be directly related to forces applied to and experienced by the implant. Monitoring the force applied to the implant, e.g., a bone plate, over time may allow the doctor to determine whether the bone is healing at the appropriate rate. As a bone heals, the amount of load carried by the bone will increase, and a proportionally lower load will be carried by the implant, and thus a lower strain will be measured by a strain gauge mounted to the plate. If the measured plate loading does not decrease at the expected rate, the doctor may take remedial action. Similarly, early detection of an overloading condition in the plate may allow the doctor to correct or replace an over-stressed or fatigued plate or fastener. It has been observed that non-unions are clinically diagnosed six months after the fracture event. If the strain gauge does not detect transfer of loading conditions, it may indicate delayed union and could signal potential damage to the implant or the end of its useful life.
One or more sensors may also be used to monitor the number of loading cycles, e.g., axial, bending, torsional, etc., experienced by the implant. One cycle may be defined as an application of stress to the implant followed by the release of that stress. For example, if the implant is installed along the femur of a patient, one cycle could be one step in which the patient puts pressure on the implant as his or her foot hits the ground followed by a release of that stress when the patient lifts his or her foot from the ground. The life of an implant is usually determined by how many cycles it experiences until bone healing occurs or until the implant fails. A doctor can determine when an implant needs to be replaced by using a counter programmed to log the amount of cycles the implant has been through. In addition, such a counter may be useful in determining the cause of an implant failure, such as due to over-activity of the patient or clinical non-union of the fracture.
It may also be desirable to obtain temperature readings at various locations along the implant to determine whether the tissue surrounding the implant is infected following implantation. Normal healthy human tissue has a temperature in the range of from about 36 degrees Celsius to about 37.5 degrees C. It has been observed that infected tissue may evidence an increase in temperature to a range above about 38 degrees C. Thus, if such a temperature increase is detected by one or more of the temperature sensors on the implant, the doctor may choose to initiate a regimen of antibiotics, or may take other more invasive actions to eliminate the infection. In one embodiment, as discussed above, the treating physician may send a signal to the implant to release a bolus of antibiotics stored in a compartment within the implant in order to treat an infection, or, alternatively, the implant itself may be configured to automatically release antibiotics if a certain threshold temperature is reached. Abnormally high tissue temperatures in the vicinity of the implant may also signal that the patient is experiencing an adverse reaction to the material of the implant. For example, if the implant is made of or contains a material to which the patient is allergic (e.g. nickel), the patient's body may react to the implant in a manner similar to that of an infection. Thus, patient rejection of the implant may likewise be determined through temperature measurement. Digital photographic elements within sensors 50 in the implant may also be used to view images of patient tissue for signs of infection and/or implant rejection.
Since body temperatures may be influenced by factors such as exercise, temperature readings would likely take place in the doctor's office or other controlled setting, rather than being constantly monitored or monitored by the patient. The temperature sensors preferably will be located anywhere on the surface of the plate, except between the plate and the bone. Monitoring of temperatures through sensors mounted on a bone plate thus may aid the doctor in making an important early diagnosis of infection, increasing the chance that the infection may be effectively contained. In still other embodiments, sensors 50 on implant 10 may detect chemical agents/reagents formed by and in the patient's surrounding tissues.
Reference is now made to
In one embodiment the receiving device is a wireless hand-held computer, such as a Pocket PC®, Palm Pilot®, Blackberry® device or cellular telephone, that may be used to request information from the implant, store information sent by the implant, and send information to the implant. For example, the surgeon may pass the handheld device over the portion of the patient's body containing the implant, and the device may upload strain, temperature, pH, and/or pressure data from one or more sensors located on the implant. Thereafter, software associated with the microchip 100, sensors 50 and/or handheld device 160 may manipulate the uploaded data to provide a visual readout to the surgeon. Such a readout may comprise discrete force, temperature and pressure and stress cycle values taken from the individual sensors. The readout may also comprise a graph of the values obtained from the same patient over time. It may also provide an alarm feature that would signal a dangerous condition such as substantial implant overloading, substantial loss of compression between implant and bone, a high temperature condition indicative of infection, and/or an abnormally low or high cyclic loading count indicating the patient is either not participating in the proscribed recuperative therapy or is exerting him or herself more than a prescribed amount. In one embodiment, the software may display an image of the particular implant with measured force, pressure and temperature readings displayed at or near the actual location of the sensors on the implant. Further, instead of a discrete numerical readout associated with each sensor, the image may simply be color-coded to indicate satisfactory or unsatisfactory (i.e. alarm) conditions. Thus, in an exemplary embodiment, portions of the plate that are experiencing expected values of strain, pressure, pH, time, cycle count and temperature would appear in blue, whereas portions of the plate experiencing much higher than expected values would appear in red. Threshold normal and high strain, temperature, pressure and cycle values may be programmed into the microchip on the implant, or may be selected by the surgeon using the handheld device or from another computer associated with the implant. The surgeon may then use a stylus to select desired portions of the implant on the screen, and specific loading, pressure, cycle count, time, and/or temperature data would be displayed for the affected (i.e. red) area of the implant. In other embodiments, the receiving device may include external diagnostic equipment such as a CT scanner, which can send and receive data to and from the implants 10, and/or other handheld devices 160. The method of communication between implants 10 and/or devices 160 may include infrared communication.
In one embodiment, the microchip 100 and data logging device 140 may contain implant-specific information supplied by the manufacturer such as implant type, sensor type, implant/sensor manufacturing date, location, lot, etc. Calibration data for each sensor may also be contained therein. Further, the microchip 100 and data logging device 140 may contain all of the historical readings from all of the sensors associated with the implant. The microchip 100 may also be programmed to perform manipulation of the data received from the sensors. Thus, in one embodiment the handheld device may perform minimal manipulation of data and may instead simply display data that has already been manipulated by the microchip 100 and stored by the data logging device 140. Alternatively, the handheld device may be used to perform some data manipulation.
Thereafter, the doctor may transmit the information from the handheld device to a desktop computer or web server for long term storage or for further manipulation as desired. In one embodiment, data may be transmitted anonymously to the manufacturer confidentially via the internet or other secure transmission method (to protect patient privacy). The manufacturer may then use such data to assist in designing future implants. The implants 10 and sending/receiving device 160 may also be configured for satellite communication.
In one embodiment, the microchip may be programmed to turn on and off at predetermined intervals in order to transmit information only at certain times of the day. Such an arrangement may be advantageous where the microchip is powered by a battery, and may thus may act to conserve battery power. Alternately, the microchip may be configured to continuously transmit data throughout the life of the implant. This may be useful when a computer is used to continuously gather the information so that graphs may be made of different variables, such as temperature, strain, load and fatigue, and how these variables may change throughout the day, including how the patient's activities may affect the variables and whether and how such variables may affect the implant.
As earlier noted, the information stored in the data logging device 140 may be sent to a receiver 160 outside the body using a wireless (i.e., radio frequency (RF), infrared, etc.) transmitter 130. The wireless receiver may be connected to a handheld device or a personal computer 170 so that the patient and/or surgeon may view information transmitted from the bone plate or may send the information over the Internet to a recipient for analysis. In an alternative embodiment, data stored by implant 10 may be transmitted to a receiver 160 outside the body using a hard wired connection.
Alternately, the patient in whom the implant is installed may have a receiver in their home or office. The microchip may be configured to transmit a signal wirelessly to the receiver station if a certain condition occurs. For example, if the microchip senses an increase in temperature over a predetermined temperature, it may send an alarm signal to the base station, which may then issue an alarm signal audible to the user. Similar alarms based on over-strain, under-pressure, or over-cycling conditions may likewise be implemented. Alarm signals received by a wireless base station may also be sent automatically by the base station over the Internet to a doctor who may contact the patient with immediate instructions.
In one embodiment, the microchip may be powered using the principle of induction. In this embodiment, one coil of wire is attached to the microchip within the implant and one coil of wire is embedded in a reader device located outside the patient. Excitation in the coil located outside the patient will produce an excitation in the coil within the implant. A remote energy source, such as an ultrasound device, may be used to excite the induction coils. This arrangement may operate like a transformer to power the microchip, thus obviating the need for battery power.
In an alternate embodiment, the implant may use a piezoelectric crystal which will use the loading and unloading cycle of the bone plate to generate a voltage which may be used to power the bone plate.
In yet another alternate embodiment, the microchip may use piezoelectric technology to create micro-motion within the implant. This micro-motion may be transmitted to the bone to facilitate healing of the bone. Alternatively, the micro-motion inherent in a healing bone may be used to power the microchip. Thus, a piezoelectric crystal may be used to receive the micro-motion and convert the motion to a charge that may power the device.
Referring again to
In another embodiment, the microchip may be used to send electric current through electrodes 70 located on different locations of the bone plate in order to electronically stimulate growth of the bone. Such stimulation may speed bone growth and recovery, and such phenomenon are well known in the art. One example of electrical current used to stimulate bone growth in implants and increase infection resistance of any antibacterial agents used with the bone plate is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,663,634 to Ahrens et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference.
In a further embodiment, at least a portion of the bone plate may be coated, where the coating may include a polymer or porous metal, such as magnesium, that can act as a carrier or a substrate for a pharmaceutically active agent or synthetic agent. Such agents can include antibiotics, microbicides, growth factors (BMPs and/or VEGFs), angiogenesis inhibitors (fibulin-5) or chemotherapeutic agents. The coating may be biodegradable in the patient. A non-limiting exemplary coating is described in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/801,752 to Schmidmaier et al., filed on Mar. 9, 2001, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
In one embodiment, the microchip may transmit information wirelessly by radio frequency (RF) as known in the art. The bone plate may also be encoded with information such as when the plate was installed and who installed it so that doctors can access this information from the plate by using radio frequency identification (RFID).
Although the present invention has been shown and described in connection with an implanted bone plate, one skilled in the art would recognize that the present invention can also be practiced with other types of orthopaedic implants, such as bone screws, intramedullary rods, spinal fixation elements and implants (e.g., pedicle screws, hooks, etc.), external fixators and distractors. One example of such a bone screw is shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,306,140 to Siddiqui which is hereby incorporated by reference. Siddiqui describes a bone screw inserted into bone which is suitable for stabilizing a fractured bone. The bone screw has threads and provides compression to stabilize different regions of bone. A microchip may be installed within the bone screw with one or more sensors located at different locations on the bone screw to monitor stress, strain, temperature and pressure.
An embodiment of a bone pin which may be used in connection with the present invention is shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,663,634 to Ahrens et al. Ahrens discloses a bone pin for insertion into bone that is coated with an antibacterial agent. The bone pin as disclosed in Ahrens may be adapted to practice the present invention by installing a microchip within the bone pin and one or more sensors located on the bone pin.
As shown in
As discussed above, the present invention may also be practiced in connection with spinal fixation devices such as pedicle screws 210 (
The present invention may also be practiced in connection with intervertebral implants, such as artificial spinal discs or spacers used in both fusion and non-fusion procedures for replacing damaged spinal discs.
As shown in
Similarly, as shown in
Another embodiment of the invention would provide for a centralized web server maintained by the manufacturer of the implants. The web server would be in communication with the various doctors that install and service the implants. When a doctor uses a computer or wireless device to collect information from the implant, the doctor may then transmit this information to the centralized web server. The manufacturer may then use this information to determine the average useful life of the particular implant model, and may also compile the data to determine what the common causes of failure for the implant model. The manufacturer also may also use this data to determine whether trends in implant success or failure may be used to educate surgeons on the most effective installation technique for a particular implant. This information may assist the manufacturer in designing new and improved implants, and in refining installation techniques.
While the present invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that numerous variations and modifications will be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. This is especially true with regard to the specific shape and configuration of the implant and sensors. For example, sensors for measuring strain, temperature, compression and/or load cycling may be used in virtually any known orthopedic fixation application. Non-limiting examples of such applications are: plates used in maxillofacial fixation applications, footplates used with facial distraction systems, cranial flap clamps, pins used with external fixation devices, spinal fusion plates, spinal fusion rod assemblies, etc.
Accordingly, it should be clearly understood that the embodiments of the invention described above are not intended as limitations on the scope of the invention, which is defined only by the following claims.
Morgan, Chad, Green, James M., Flexner, Geoffrey, Geltz, Charles E., Hall, Harry T.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11707224, | Jun 28 2019 | HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP | Orthopedic system for pre-operative, intraoperative, and post-operative assessment |
11730862, | May 08 2020 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Identifier-based application of therapeutic coatings to medical implant devices |
11806054, | Feb 23 2021 | NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS, INC | Adjustable implant, system and methods |
11826164, | Jun 28 2019 | HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP | Subdermal medical system for generating measurement data or providing a therapy |
11877862, | Jun 28 2019 | HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP | Medical system having a position measurment patch device for providing measurement data or a therapy |
11925475, | Jun 28 2019 | HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP | Orthopedic system for pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative assessment |
11944359, | Feb 23 2021 | NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS, INC | Adjustable implant, system and methods |
ER2307, |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3646940, | |||
3745995, | |||
3783880, | |||
3788647, | |||
3820534, | |||
3842841, | |||
3918440, | |||
3922918, | |||
3964473, | Sep 21 1972 | ELECTRO-BIOLOGY, INC ; ELECTRO-BIOLOGY, INC , #1 ELECTRO-BIOLOGY BOULEVARD, LOS FRAILES INDUSTRIAL PARK, GUAYNABO, PUERTO RICO 00657-1359, A CORP OF DE | Bone prosthesis |
3977391, | Jul 16 1974 | Hittman Corporation | Pressure sensor apparatus |
4006735, | Jul 16 1974 | Hittman Corporation | Pressure sensor apparatus |
4014319, | Mar 07 1974 | Etat de Vaud | Intercranial pressure transducer |
4026276, | Apr 05 1976 | The Johns Hopkins University | Intracranial pressure monitor |
4026304, | Apr 12 1972 | Hydro Med Sciences Inc. | Bone generating method and device |
4027661, | Jul 16 1974 | Hittman Corporation | Pressure sensor |
4062354, | Jul 01 1975 | Intracranial pressure transducer system | |
4114606, | Nov 12 1976 | The Johns Hopkins University | Monitoring apparatus for resonant circuit intracranial pressure implants |
4127110, | May 24 1976 | Huntington Institute of Applied Medical Research | Implantable pressure transducer |
4141349, | Nov 04 1975 | Agence Nationale de Valorisation de la Recherche (ANVAR) | Process and device for the in vivo measurement of bone consolidation |
4153060, | Mar 15 1978 | University of Pennsylvania | Method and apparatus for electrically enhanced bone growth and tooth movement |
4186749, | May 12 1977 | The United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the | Induction powered biological radiosonde |
4195367, | Mar 19 1976 | Long-term endoprosthesis | |
4214322, | Mar 19 1976 | Long-term endoprosthesis | |
4216548, | Mar 19 1976 | Long-term endoprosthesis | |
4231376, | Jul 16 1974 | Hittman Corporation | Pressure sensor |
4246908, | Oct 19 1976 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Kenkyusho | Intracranial pressure transducer |
4265252, | Apr 19 1978 | The Johns Hopkins University | Intracranial pressure implant |
4306564, | Sep 22 1977 | Electrification attachment for an osteo-synthesis implantate | |
4313438, | Jul 16 1979 | Tissue growth control apparatus and method | |
4314554, | Jul 16 1979 | Tissue growth control apparatus and method | |
4333469, | Jul 20 1979 | ELECTRO-BIOLOGY, INC , #1 ELECTRO-BIOLOGY BOULEVARD, LOS FRAILES INDUSTRIAL PARK, GUAYNABO, PUERTO RICO 00657-1359, A CORP OF DE | Bone growth stimulator |
4354506, | Jan 17 1980 | Naganokeiki Seisakujo Company, Ltd. | Intracranial pressure gauge |
4391124, | Feb 26 1981 | Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. | Electroacoustic transducer calibration method and apparatus |
4414979, | Feb 23 1981 | ELECTRO-BIOLOGY, INC , #1 ELECTRO-BIOLOGY BOULEVARD, LOS FRAILES INDUSTRIAL PARK, GUAYNABO, PUERTO RICO 00657-1359, A CORP OF DE | Monitorable bone growth stimulator |
4421115, | Sep 22 1977 | Electrification attachment for an osteosynthesis implantate | |
4432361, | Jan 18 1982 | Sutter Biomedical Inc. | Portable continuously self-monitoring bone healing device and method |
4506681, | Nov 11 1981 | South African Inventions Development Corporation | Surgical implant |
4549546, | Dec 30 1983 | ELECTRO-BIOLOGY, INC , #1 ELECTRO-BIOLOGY BOULEVARD, LOS FRAILES INDUSTRIAL PARK, GUAYNABO, PUERTO RICO 00657-1359, A CORP OF DE | Bone growth stimulator |
4549547, | Jul 27 1982 | Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania | Implantable bone growth stimulator |
4558701, | Aug 19 1983 | Osteoblastic stimulation implant | |
4576158, | Jan 28 1983 | Region Wallone | Method for determining the stability of an orthopedic device composed of an external fixation bar during setting of bone fractures |
4602638, | Oct 03 1984 | Apparatus and method for invasive electrical stimulation of bone fractures | |
4611597, | Nov 03 1982 | Implantable device for the stimulation of bone growth | |
4618822, | Apr 18 1984 | POSITION ORIENTATION SYSTEMS, LTD , A VERMONT PARTNERSHIP CONSISTING OF PERKROGH HANSEN, AND FRED MARKS | Displacement sensing device utilizing adjustable tuned circuit |
4665920, | Nov 28 1984 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Skeletal tissue stimulator and a low voltage oscillator circuit for use therein |
4738267, | Mar 22 1985 | Universite Paul Sabatier (Toulouse III) | Implantable, intracranial-pressure sensor |
4784154, | Nov 13 1986 | Colin Medical Technology Corporation | Interference resistant biomedical transducer |
4869265, | Apr 03 1987 | ZIMMER ORTHOPAEDIC SURGICAL PRODUCTS, INC | Biomedical pressure transducer |
4993428, | Feb 12 1990 | MICROSTRAIN, A COMPANY OF VT | Method of and means for implanting a pressure and force sensing apparatus |
5024239, | Dec 21 1988 | Method and apparatus for determining osseous implant fixation integrity | |
5030236, | Jun 19 1989 | ZIMMER, INC | Apparatus for enhancing biointegration of bony and endoprosthesis structures |
5037442, | Aug 30 1988 | Sulzer Brothers Limited | Fixing stem for a prosthesis |
5052375, | Feb 21 1990 | IZEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Instrumented orthopedic restraining device and method of use |
5056518, | Jul 02 1990 | ELECTRO-BIOLOGY, LLC | Optimization of bone formation at cathodes |
5056530, | Dec 15 1988 | UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI, A CORP OF OHIO | Method of measuring axial force in mammalian fibrous tissue and device |
5083573, | Feb 12 1990 | Lord Corporation | Method of and means for implanting a pressure and force sensing apparatus |
5112332, | Dec 21 1988 | ZIMMER TECHNOLOGY, INC | Method of performing spinal surgery |
5188109, | May 30 1990 | Artificial dental root | |
5197488, | Apr 05 1991 | N. K. Biotechnical Engineering Co. | Knee joint load measuring instrument and joint prosthesis |
5263955, | Jul 04 1989 | Medullary nail | |
5290281, | Jun 15 1992 | Medicon eG | Surgical system |
5304210, | Jan 28 1992 | AMEI TECHNOLOGIES INC , A DELAWARE CORPORATION | Apparatus for distributed bone growth stimulation |
5314458, | Jun 01 1990 | University of Michigan | Single channel microstimulator |
5326363, | Sep 14 1992 | ZIMMER TECHNOLOGY, INC | Provisional implant |
5330477, | Jan 28 1992 | AMEI TECHNOLOGIES INC , A DELAWARE CORPORATION | Apparatus and method for bone fixation and fusion stimulation |
5360016, | Apr 05 1991 | N. K. Biotechnical Engineering Company | Force transducer for a joint prosthesis |
5368546, | Feb 21 1990 | IZEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Instrumented orthopedic restraining device and method of use |
5406853, | Feb 08 1990 | AMETEK, INC ; AMETEK AEROSPACE PRODUCTS, INC | Instrument for the application of controlled mechanical loads to tissues in sterile culture |
5425775, | Jun 23 1992 | N.K. Biotechnical Engineering Company | Method for measuring patellofemoral forces |
5433203, | Jul 22 1993 | Aloka Co., Ltd. | Bone assessment apparatus and method |
5437668, | Feb 18 1994 | Board of Trustees of the University of Ark. | Apparatus and method for clinical use of load measurement in distraction osteogenesis |
5441527, | Feb 20 1992 | AMEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Implantable bone growth stimulator and method of operation |
5456724, | Dec 15 1993 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Load sensor for bone graft |
5470354, | Nov 12 1991 | Biomet Manufacturing, LLC | Force sensing apparatus and method for orthopaedic joint reconstruction |
5497147, | Jun 21 1993 | Lord Corporation | Differential variable reluctance transducer |
5524624, | May 05 1994 | AMEI Technologies Inc. | Apparatus and method for stimulating tissue growth with ultrasound |
5565005, | Feb 20 1992 | AMEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Implantable growth tissue stimulator and method operation |
5626579, | Feb 12 1993 | CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION, THE | Bone transport and lengthening system |
5678448, | Jan 14 1994 | Fullen Systems, LLC | System for continuously measuring forces applied by the foot |
5695496, | Jan 17 1995 | Smith & Nephew Inc. | Method of measuring bone strain to detect fracture consolidation |
5738521, | Jul 19 1996 | EBI, LLC | Method for accelerating osseointegration of metal bone implants using electrical stimulation |
5752976, | Jun 23 1995 | REMOTE BIOMEDICAL TECH, LLC; REMOTE BIOMEDICAL, TECH, LLC | World wide patient location and data telemetry system for implantable medical devices |
5766231, | Feb 20 1992 | AMEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Implantable growth tissue stimulator and method of operation |
5777467, | Jun 21 1993 | Lord Corporation | Miniaturized displacement transducer assembly |
5791350, | Jun 07 1995 | Device and method for measuring force systems | |
5792076, | Jan 17 1995 | SMITH & NEPHEW RICHARDS INC | Fracture consolidation measuring apparatus |
5827209, | Sep 23 1994 | BCAM International, Inc. | Intelligent body support |
5873840, | Aug 21 1997 | NEFF, INDIVIDUAL, JANINE; NEURO DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES, INC | Intracranial pressure monitoring system |
5887351, | Jan 13 1997 | Lord Corporation | Inclined plate 360 degree absolute angle sensor |
5978972, | Jun 14 1996 | Johns Hopkins University | Helmet system including at least three accelerometers and mass memory and method for recording in real-time orthogonal acceleration data of a head |
6022349, | Feb 12 1997 | AMERICAN MEDICAL INNOVATIONS, L L C | Method and system for therapeutically treating bone fractures and osteoporosis |
6025725, | Dec 05 1996 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Electrically active resonant structures for wireless monitoring and control |
6034295, | Nov 30 1995 | Christoph, Rehberg | Implantable device having an internal electrode for stimulating growth of tissue |
6034296, | Mar 11 1997 | EEG LTD | Implantable bone strain telemetry sensing system and method |
6059784, | Oct 08 1998 | The United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the | Capacitive extensometer particularly suited for measuring in vivo bone strain |
6083174, | Feb 13 1997 | sci-worx GmbH | Implantable measuring unit for intracorporal measurement of patient data |
6092530, | Mar 24 1999 | PMD HOLDINGS CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF ILLINOIS | Remotely interrogated implant device with sensor for detecting accretion of biological matter |
6111520, | Apr 18 1997 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | System and method for the wireless sensing of physical properties |
6112122, | Nov 17 1998 | EBI, LLC | Preformed extendable mesh cathode for implantable bone growth stimulator |
6113553, | Mar 05 1996 | Lifesensors, Inc. | Telemetric intracranial pressure monitoring system |
6117089, | Apr 25 1995 | Los Alamos National Security, LLC | Method for noninvasive intracranial pressure measurement |
6120467, | Apr 30 1998 | Medtronic Inc. | Spinal cord simulation systems with patient activity monitoring and therapy adjustments |
6120502, | Jun 13 1988 | Apparatus and method for the delivery of electrical current for interbody spinal arthrodesis | |
6143035, | Jan 28 1999 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Implanted bone stimulator and prosthesis system and method of enhancing bone growth |
6165135, | Jul 14 1999 | NEFF, INDIVIDUAL, JANINE; NEURO DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES, INC | System and method of interrogating implanted passive resonant-circuit devices |
6176879, | Jul 02 1998 | Cochlear Limited | Medical implant |
6248080, | Oct 30 1998 | Medtronic, Inc | Intracranial monitoring and therapy delivery control device, system and method |
6261247, | Dec 31 1998 | BALL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC | Position sensing system |
6278379, | Apr 02 1998 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | System, method, and sensors for sensing physical properties |
6289753, | Feb 14 1997 | The United States of America as represented by the Department of Health and | Method for measuring mechanical properties of the collagen network in cartilage |
6292699, | Jan 29 1999 | EBI, LLC | Direct current stimulation of spinal interbody fixation device |
6305229, | Dec 23 1997 | Tanaka Systems Incorporated | Detecting fatigue from magnetic characteristics |
6311562, | Sep 02 1999 | Human lumbar model structure capable of simulating pressure applied to nucleus pulposus in human lumbar and application equipment utilizing the structure | |
6322562, | Dec 19 1998 | Fixation system for bones | |
6357303, | Jul 15 1997 | EVERETT L SMITH, LLC | Mechanical testing device |
6387096, | Jun 13 2000 | Magnetic array implant and method of treating adjacent bone portions | |
6433629, | Jan 24 2000 | Lord Corporation | Micropower differential sensor measurement |
6443891, | Sep 20 2000 | Medtronic, Inc. | Telemetry modulation protocol system for medical devices |
6447448, | Dec 31 1998 | BALL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC | Miniature implanted orthopedic sensors |
6453198, | Apr 28 2000 | Medtronic, Inc.; Medtronic, Inc | Power management for an implantable medical device |
6481440, | Sep 13 1999 | Medtronic, Inc. | Lamina prosthesis for delivery of medical treatment |
6494097, | Sep 05 2000 | Method and apparatus for measuring thickness of a layer in a multi-layered object | |
6529127, | Jul 11 1997 | Lord Corporation | System for remote powering and communication with a network of addressable, multichannel sensing modules |
6533733, | Sep 24 1999 | UT-Battelle, LLC | Implantable device for in-vivo intracranial and cerebrospinal fluid pressure monitoring |
6546293, | Feb 15 2001 | Electro Core Technologies, LLC; ElectroCore Technologies, LLC | Hook-shaped spinal cord electrode assembly having a telescoping electrode |
6554781, | Dec 14 1998 | Spinal Sensor Technologies Limited; Carter (New Zealand) Limited | Spinal monitor apparatus and method |
6572543, | Jun 26 1996 | Medtronic, Inc | Sensor, method of sensor implant and system for treatment of respiratory disorders |
6575042, | Feb 13 2002 | TECOMET, INC | Beam-type torsion applying and measuring tool |
6581481, | May 07 2001 | The United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; ADMINISTRATOR OF NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION | Capacitive extensometer |
6583630, | Jan 31 2001 | INTELLIJOINT SYSTEMS LTD | Systems and methods for monitoring wear and/or displacement of artificial joint members, vertebrae, segments of fractured bones and dental implants |
6585666, | Oct 13 1998 | ADMINISTRATOR OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND THE | Arthroscopic diagnostic probe to measure mechanical properties of articular cartilage |
6591698, | Dec 20 1996 | Nobel Biocare Services AG | Surgical instrument with means to display torque and torsional angle |
6605089, | Jun 13 1988 | Apparatus and method for the delivery of electrical current for interbody spinal arthrodesis | |
6610096, | Aug 22 2001 | Biomed Solutions, LLC | Prosthetic implants having enhanced utility |
6622567, | Mar 01 1999 | Lord Corporation | Micropower peak strain detection system for remote interrogation |
6636760, | Jul 03 1998 | Abatis Medical Technologies Limited | Planar transducer for measuring biomedical pressures |
6638276, | Jun 06 2001 | NEUROTHERM, INC | Intervertebral disc device employing prebent sheath |
6648903, | Sep 08 1998 | Medical tensioning system | |
6656135, | May 01 2000 | Southwest Research Institute | Passive and wireless displacement measuring device |
6689087, | Mar 28 2001 | GYRUS ACMI, INC D B A OLYMPUS SURGICAL TECHNOLOGIES AMERICA | Floating probe for ultrasonic transducers |
6706005, | Aug 24 2001 | CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION, THE | Apparatus and method for assessing loads on adjacent bones |
6706042, | Mar 16 2001 | FINSBURY DEVELOPMENT LIMITED | Tissue distractor |
6802811, | Sep 17 1999 | ENDOLUMINAL THERAPEUTICS, INC | Sensing, interrogating, storing, telemetering and responding medical implants |
6932308, | Oct 25 2000 | Exogen, Inc | Transducer mounting assembly |
6974417, | Oct 05 2001 | QUEEN S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON | Ultrasound transducer array |
6976982, | Jan 09 2001 | MICROCHIPS BIOTECH, INC | Flexible microchip devices for ophthalmic and other applications |
7007699, | Oct 28 1999 | SURGICAL NAVIGATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Surgical sensor |
7060075, | Jul 18 2002 | Biosense, Inc | Distal targeting of locking screws in intramedullary nails |
7237556, | Feb 11 2002 | Smith & Nephew, Inc | Image-guided fracture reduction |
7357037, | Jul 10 2002 | Globus Medical, Inc | Strain sensing system |
8241296, | Apr 08 2003 | Zimmer, Inc. | Use of micro and miniature position sensing devices for use in TKA and THA |
20010000195, | |||
20010000803, | |||
20010047246, | |||
20020024450, | |||
20020049394, | |||
20020050174, | |||
20020110715, | |||
20020111660, | |||
20020115944, | |||
20020143268, | |||
20020147416, | |||
20020151770, | |||
20020198604, | |||
20030029247, | |||
20030032997, | |||
20030040806, | |||
20030055476, | |||
20030066365, | |||
20030069623, | |||
20030069644, | |||
20030078633, | |||
20030083746, | |||
20030088301, | |||
20030105461, | |||
20030120323, | |||
20030135253, | |||
20030139690, | |||
20030139782, | |||
20030153918, | |||
20030153959, | |||
20030174066, | |||
20030199948, | |||
20030204161, | |||
20030204221, | |||
20030204222, | |||
20030204223, | |||
20030204224, | |||
20030212445, | |||
20030216666, | |||
20030236558, | |||
20040011137, | |||
20040015202, | |||
20040015204, | |||
20040015205, | |||
20040016298, | |||
20040019369, | |||
20040019382, | |||
20040019384, | |||
20040073221, | |||
20040102820, | |||
20050222569, | |||
20060036259, | |||
20060136061, | |||
CH662279, | |||
DE10137011, | |||
DE3245453, | |||
DE3414992, | |||
DE3442549, | |||
DE4442930, | |||
EP553517, | |||
EP561068, | |||
EP611583, | |||
EP956811, | |||
EP1351428, | |||
EP1671577, | |||
EP1854503, | |||
FR2875972, | |||
GB2223406, | |||
JP2000237219, | |||
JP5277195, | |||
JP9098978, | |||
WO178226, | |||
WO2005000090, | |||
WO2005049105, | |||
WO2005074821, | |||
WO2005120203, | |||
WO2006045607, | |||
WO2006098759, | |||
WO9006720, | |||
WO9532673, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Aug 30 2005 | GELTZ, CHARLES E | SYNTHES U S A | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 036534 | /0379 | |
Aug 31 2005 | HALL, HARRY T , IV | SYNTHES U S A | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 036534 | /0379 | |
Aug 31 2005 | FLEXNER, GEOFFREY | SYNTHES U S A | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 036534 | /0379 | |
Sep 27 2005 | MORGAN, CHAD | SYNTHES U S A | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 036534 | /0379 | |
Dec 20 2006 | GREEN, JAMES M | SYNTHES U S A | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 036534 | /0379 | |
Dec 31 2008 | SYNTHES U S A | Synthes USA, LLC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 036585 | /0376 | |
Dec 30 2012 | DEPUY SPINE, LLC | HAND INNOVATIONS LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 036534 | /0232 | |
Dec 30 2012 | Synthes USA, LLC | DEPUY SPINE, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 036534 | /0300 | |
Dec 31 2012 | HAND INNOVATIONS LLC | Depuy Synthes Products, LLC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 036585 | /0338 | |
Dec 19 2014 | Depuy Synthes Products, LLC | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 036585 | /0531 | |
Sep 03 2015 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Aug 25 2017 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Mar 24 2021 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 24 2020 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 24 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 24 2021 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 24 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 24 2024 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 24 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 24 2025 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 24 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 24 2028 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 24 2029 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 24 2029 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 24 2031 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |