An electromagnetically-activated actuator includes an electrical coil, an armature moveable between rest and actuated positions, and a bi-directional driver. A method for controlling an actuator event includes applying a supply voltage at a first polarity across the coil for a first duration to drive a forward current through the coil effective to move the armature away from the rest position. The forward current has a forward current peak at the end of the first duration. After the first duration, the supply voltage is applied at a second polarity across the coil for a second duration to drive a reverse current through the coil. The second duration terminates when the reverse current attains a predetermined reverse current peak, wherein the predetermined reverse current peak is coincident with the armature returning to the rest position.
|
8. A method for controlling an injection event of an electromagnetically-activated fuel injector, including an electrical coil, a valve moveable between closed and open positions, and a bi-directional driver, comprising:
applying a supply voltage at a first polarity across the coil for a first duration to drive a forward current through the coil effective to move the valve away from the closed position, said forward current having a forward current peak at the end of said first duration; and
after said first duration, applying the supply voltage at a second polarity across the coil for a second duration to drive a reverse current through the coil, said second duration terminating when the reverse current attains a predetermined reverse current peak, wherein the predetermined reverse current peak is coincident with the instant the valve reaches the closed position.
1. A method for controlling an actuator event of an electromagnetically-activated actuator, including an electrical coil, an armature moveable between rest and actuated positions, and a bi-directional driver, comprising:
applying a supply voltage at a first polarity across the coil for a first duration to drive a forward current through the coil effective to move the armature away from the rest position, said forward current having a forward current peak at the end of said first duration; and
after said first duration, applying the supply voltage at a second polarity across the coil for a second duration to drive a reverse current through the coil, said second duration terminating when the reverse current attains a predetermined reverse current peak, wherein the predetermined reverse current peak is coincident with the instant the armature reaches the rest position.
15. A fuel injection system, comprising:
an electromagnetically-activated fuel injector, comprising an electrical coil, and a valve moveable between closed and open positions;
a bi-directional driver;
a control module configured to:
control the bi-directional driver to apply a supply voltage at a first polarity across the coil for a first duration to drive a forward current through the coil effective to move the valve away from the closed position, said forward current having a forward current peak at the end of said first duration; and
after said first duration, apply the supply voltage at a second polarity across the coil for a second duration to drive a reverse current through the coil, said second duration terminating when the reverse current attains a predetermined reverse current peak, wherein the predetermined reverse current peak is coincident with the instant the valve reaches the closed position.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
6. The method of
7. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
11. The method of
12. The method of
13. The method of
14. The method of
16. The fuel injection system of
17. The fuel injection system of
18. The fuel injection system of
19. The fuel injection system of
20. The fuel injection system of
|
This disclosure is related to electromagnetically-activated actuators.
The statements in this section merely provide background information related to the present disclosure. Accordingly, such statements are not intended to constitute an admission of prior art.
Fuel injectors are used to directly inject pressurized fuel into combustion chambers of internal combustion engines. Known fuel injectors include electromagnetically-activated solenoid devices that overcome mechanical springs to open a valve located at a tip of the injector to permit fuel flow therethrough. Injector driver circuits control flow of electric current to the electromagnetically-activated solenoid devices to open and close the injectors. Injector driver circuits may operate in a peak-and-hold control configuration or a saturated switch configuration.
Fuel injectors are calibrated, with a calibration including an injector activation signal including an injector open-time, or injection duration, and a corresponding metered or delivered injected fuel mass operating at a predetermined or known fuel pressure. Injector operation may be characterized in terms of injected fuel mass per fuel injection event in relation to injection duration. Injector characterization includes metered fuel flow over a range between high flow rate associated with high-speed, high-load engine operation and low flow rate associated with engine idle conditions.
It is known to inject a plurality of small injected fuel masses in rapid succession for controlling an engine. Generally, when a dwell time between consecutive injection events is less than a dwell time threshold, injected fuel masses of subsequent fuel injection events often result in a larger delivered magnitude than what is desired even through equal injection durations are utilized. Accordingly, such subsequent fuel injection events can become unstable resulting in unacceptable repeatability. This undesirable occurrence is attributed to the existence of residual magnetic flux within the fuel injector that is produced by the preceding fuel injection event that offers some assistance to the immediately subsequent fuel injection event. The residual magnetic flux is produced in response to persistent eddy currents and magnetic hysteresis within the fuel injector. It is known to compensate for the effect of the larger than desired delivered magnitude of injected fuel mass solely by adjusting the injection duration of the subsequent injection event; however, the corresponding subsequent fuel injection may still become unstable resulting in unacceptable repeatability.
Current may be driven in a reverse direction to reduce valve closing delay caused by residual magnetic flux within the fuel injector. However, non-optimum reverse current drive will result in poor correlation of the fuel injector valve closing instant to the peak reverse current point. This may negatively impact precision fuel metering and injection control.
An electromagnetically-activated actuator includes an electrical coil, an armature moveable between rest and actuated positions, and a bi-directional driver. A method for controlling an actuator event includes applying a supply voltage at a first polarity across the coil for a first duration to drive a forward current through the coil effective to move the armature away from the rest position. The forward current has a forward current peak at the end of the first duration. After the first duration, the supply voltage is applied at a second polarity across the coil for a second duration to drive a reverse current through the coil. The second duration terminates when the reverse current attains a predetermined reverse current peak, wherein the predetermined reverse current peak is coincident with the armature returning to the rest position.
One or more embodiments will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
This disclosure describes the concepts of the presently claimed subject matter with respect to an exemplary application to linear motion fuel injectors. However, the claimed subject matter is more broadly applicable to any linear or non-linear electromagnetic actuator that employs an electrical coil for inducing a magnetic field within a magnetic core resulting in an attractive force acting upon a movable armature. Typical examples include fluid control solenoids, gasoline or diesel or CNG fuel injectors employed on internal combustion engines and non-fluid solenoid actuators for positioning and control.
Referring now to the drawings, wherein the showings are for the purpose of illustrating certain exemplary embodiments only and not for the purpose of limiting the same,
Control module, module, control, controller, control unit, processor and similar terms mean any one or various combinations of one or more of Application Specific Integrated Circuit(s) (ASIC), electronic circuit(s), central processing unit(s) (preferably microprocessor(s)) and associated memory and storage (read only, programmable read only, random access, hard drive, etc.) executing one or more software or firmware programs or routines, combinational logic circuit(s), input/output circuit(s) and devices, appropriate signal conditioning and buffer circuitry, and other components to provide the described functionality. Software, firmware, programs, instructions, routines, code, algorithms and similar terms mean any instruction sets including calibrations and look-up tables. The control module has a set of control routines executed to provide the desired functions. Routines are executed, such as by a central processing unit, and are operable to monitor inputs from sensing devices and other networked control modules, and execute control and diagnostic routines to control operation of actuators. Routines may be executed at regular intervals, for example each 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 100 milliseconds during ongoing engine and vehicle operation. Alternatively, routines may be executed in response to occurrence of an event.
In general, an armature is controllable to one of an actuated position and a static or rest position. The fuel injector 10 may be any suitable discrete fuel injection device that is controllable to one of an open (actuated) position and a closed (static or rest) position. In one embodiment, the fuel injector 10 includes a cylindrically-shaped hollow body 12 defining a longitudinal axis 101. A fuel inlet 15 is located at a first end 14 of the body 12 and a fuel nozzle 28 (the fuel nozzle maybe a single opening or multiple holes in the case of a ball shaped valve) is located at a second end 16 of the body 12. The fuel inlet 15 is fluidly coupled to a high-pressure fuel line 30 that fluidly couples to a high-pressure injection pump. A valve assembly 18 is contained in the body 12, and includes a needle valve 20, a spring-activated pintle 22 and an armature portion 21. The needle valve 20 interferingly seats in the fuel nozzle 28 to control fuel flow therethrough. While the illustrated embodiment depicts a triangularly-shaped needle valve 20, other embodiments may utilize a ball. In one embodiment, the armature portion 21 is fixedly coupled to the pintle 22 and configured to linear translate as a unit with the pintle 22 and the needle valve 20 in first and second directions 81, 82, respectively. In another embodiment, the armature portion 21 may be slidably coupled to the pintle 22. For instance, the armature portion 21 may slide in the first direction 81 until being stopped by a pintle stop fixedly attached to the pintle 22. Likewise, the armature portion 21 may slide in the second direction 82 independent of the pintle 22 until contacting a pintle stop fixedly attached to the pintle 22. Upon contact with the pintle stop fixedly attached to the pintle 22, the force of the armature portion 21 causes the pintle 22 to be urged in the second direction 82 with the armature portion 21. The armature portion 21 may include protuberances to engage with various stops within the fuel injector 10.
An annular electromagnet assembly 24, including an electrical coil and magnetic core, is configured to magnetically engage the armature portion 21 of the valve assembly. The electrical coil and magnetic core assembly 24 is depicted for illustration purposes to be outside of the body of the fuel injector; however, embodiments herein are directed toward the electrical coil and magnetic core assembly 24 to be either integral to, or integrated within, the fuel injector 10. The electrical coil is wound onto the magnetic core, and includes terminals for receiving electrical current from the injector driver 50. Hereinafter, the “electrical coil and magnetic core assembly” will simply be referred to as an “electrical coil 24”. When the electrical coil 24 is deactivated and de-energized, the spring 26 urges the valve assembly 18 including the armature and needle valve 20 toward the fuel nozzle 28 in the first direction 81 to close the needle valve 20 into the rest position and prevent fuel flow therethrough. When the electrical coil 24 is activated and energized, electromagnetic force (herein after “magnetic force”) acts on the armature portion 21 to overcome the spring force exerted by the spring 26 and urges the valve assembly 18 in the second direction 82, moving the armature and needle valve 20 away from the fuel nozzle 28 and permitting flow of pressurized fuel within the valve assembly 18 to flow through the fuel nozzle 28. The fuel injector 10 may include a stopper 29 that interacts with the valve assembly 18 to stop translation of the valve assembly 18 when it is actuated and urged to open. In one embodiment, a pressure sensor 32 is configured to obtain fuel pressure 34 in the high-pressure fuel line 30 proximal to the fuel injector 10, preferably upstream of the fuel injector 10. In another embodiment, a pressure sensor may be integrated within the inlet 15 of the fuel injector in lieu of the pressure sensor 32 in the fuel rail 30 or in combination with the pressure sensor. The fuel injector 10 in the illustrated embodiment of
The control module 60 generates an injector command (actuator command) signal 52 that controls the injector driver 50, which activates the fuel injector 10 to the open position for affecting a fuel injection event. In the illustrated embodiment, the control module 60 communicates with one or more external control modules such as an engine control module (ECM) 5; however, the control module 60 may be integral to the ECM in other embodiments. The injector command signal 52 correlates to a desired mass of fuel to be delivered by the fuel injector 10 during the fuel injection event. Similarly, the injector command signal 52 may correlate to a desired fuel flow rate to be delivered by the fuel injector 10 during the fuel injection event. As used herein, the term “desired injected fuel mass” refers to the desired mass of fuel to be delivered to the engine by the fuel injector 10. As used herein, the term “desired fuel flow rate” refers to the rate at which fuel is to be delivered to the engine by the fuel injector 10 for achieving the desired mass of fuel. The desired injected fuel mass can be based upon one or more monitored input parameters 51 input to the control module 60 or ECM 5. The one or more monitored input parameters 51 may include, but are not limited to, an operator torque request, manifold absolute pressure (MAP), engine speed, engine temperature, fuel temperature, and ambient temperature obtained by known methods. The injector driver 50 generates an injector activation (actuator activation) signal 75 in response to the injector command signal 52 to activate the fuel injector 10. The injector activation signal 75 controls current flow to the electrical coil 24 to generate electromagnetic force in response to the injector command signal 52. An electric power source 40 provides a source of DC electric power for the injector driver 50. In some embodiments, the DC electric power source provides low voltage, e.g., 12 V, and a boost converter may be utilized to output a high voltage, e.g., 24V to 200 V, that is supplied to the injector driver 50. When activated using the injector activation signal 75, the electromagnetic force generated by the electrical coil 24 urges the armature portion 21 in the second direction 82. When the armature portion 21 is urged in the second direction 82, the valve assembly 18 is consequently caused to urge or translate in the second direction 82 to an actuated or open position, allowing pressurized fuel to flow therethrough. The injector driver 50 controls the injector activation signal 75 to the electrical coil 24 by any suitable method, including, e.g., pulsewidth-modulate (PWM) electric power flow. The injector driver 50 is configured to control activation of the fuel injector 10 by generating suitable injector activation signals 75. In embodiments that employ a plurality of successive fuel injection events for a given engine cycle, an injector activation signal 75 that is fixed for each of the fuel injection events within the engine cycle may be generated.
The injector activation signal 75 is characterized by an injection duration and a current waveform that includes an initial peak pull-in current and a secondary hold current. The initial peak pull-in current is characterized by a steady-state ramp up to achieve a peak current, which may be selected as described herein. The initial peak pull-in current generates electromagnetic force that acts on the armature portion 21 of the valve assembly 18 to overcome the spring force and urge the valve assembly 18 in the second direction 82 to the open position, initiating flow of pressurized fuel through the fuel nozzle 28. When the initial peak pull-in current is achieved, the injector driver 50 reduces the current in the electrical coil 24 to the secondary hold current. The secondary hold current is characterized by a somewhat steady-state current that is less than the initial peak pull-in current. The secondary hold current is a current level controlled by the injector driver 50 to maintain the valve assembly 18 in the open position to continue the flow of pressurized fuel through the fuel nozzle 28. The secondary hold current is preferably indicated by a minimum current level. When very small fuel quantities are required, the activation current waveform will not reach peak pull-in current and the current hold phase will be omitted in that case. The injector driver 50 is configured as a bi-directional current driver capable of providing a negative current flow for drawing current from the electrical coil 24. As used herein, the term “negative current flow” refers to the direction of the current flow for energizing the electrical coil to be reversed. Accordingly, the terms “negative current flow” and “reverse current flow” are used interchangeably herein.
Embodiments herein are directed toward controlling the fuel injector for a plurality of fuel injection events that are closely-spaced during an engine cycle. As used herein, the term “closely-spaced” refers to a dwell time between each consecutive fuel injection event being less than a predetermined dwell time threshold. As used herein, the term “dwell time” refers to a period of time between an end of injection for the first fuel injection event (actuator event) and a start of injection for a corresponding second fuel injection event (actuator event) of each consecutive pair of fuel injection events. The dwell time threshold can be selected to define a period of time such that dwell times less than the dwell time threshold are indicative of producing instability and/or deviations in the magnitude of injected fuel mass delivered for each of the fuel injection events. The instability and/or deviations in the magnitude of injected fuel mass may be responsive to a presence of secondary magnetic effects. The secondary magnetic effects include persistent eddy currents and magnetic hysteresis within the fuel injector and a residual flux based thereon. The persistent eddy currents and magnetic hysteresis are present due to transitions in initial flux values between the closely-spaced fuel injection events. Accordingly, the dwell time threshold is not defined by any fixed value, and selection thereof may be based upon, but not limited to, fuel temperature, fuel injector temperature, fuel injector type, fuel pressure and fuel properties such as fuel types and fuel blends. As used herein, the term “flux” refers to magnetic flux indicating the total magnetic field generated by the electrical coil 24 and passing through the armature portion. Since the turns of the electrical coil 24 link the magnetic flux in the magnetic core, this flux can therefore be equated from the flux linkage. The flux linkage is based upon the flux density passing through the armature portion, the surface area of the armature portion adjacent to the air gap and the number of turns of the coil 24. Accordingly, the terms “flux”, “magnetic flux” and “flux linkage” will be used interchangeably herein unless otherwise stated.
For fuel injection events that are not closely spaced, a fixed current waveform independent of dwell time may be utilized for each fuel injection event because the first fuel injection event of a consecutive pair has little influence on the delivered injected fuel mass of the second fuel injection event of the consecutive pair. However, the first fuel injection event may be prone to influence the delivered injected fuel mass of the second fuel injection event, and/or further subsequent fuel injection events, when the first and second fuel injection events are closely-spaced and a fixed current wave form is utilized. Any time a fuel injection event is influenced by one or more preceding fuel injection events of an engine cycle, the respective delivered injected fuel mass of the corresponding fuel injection event can result in an unacceptable repeatability over the course of a plurality of engine cycles and the consecutive fuel injection events are considered closely-spaced. More generally, any consecutive actuator events wherein residual flux from the preceding actuator event affects performance of the subsequent actuator event relative to a standard, for example relative to performance in the absence of residual flux, are considered closely-spaced.
Exemplary embodiments are further directed toward providing feedback signal(s) 42 from the fuel injector 10 to the activation controller 80. Discussed in greater detail below, sensor devices may be integrated within the fuel injector 10 for measuring various fuel injector parameters for obtaining the flux linkage of the electrical coil 24, voltage of the electrical coil 24 and current through the electrical coil 24. A current sensor may be provided on a current flow path between the activation controller 80 and the fuel injector to measure the current provided to the electrical coil 24, or the current sensor can be integrated within the fuel injector 10 on the current flow path. The fuel injector parameters provided via feedback signal(s) 42 may include the flux linkage, voltage and current directly measured by corresponding sensor devices integrated within the fuel injector 10. Additionally or alternatively the fuel injector parameters may include proxies provided via feedback signal(s) 42 to, and used by, the control module 60 to estimate the flux linkage, magnetic flux, the voltage, and the current within the fuel injector 10. Having feedback of the flux linkage of the electrical coil 24, the voltage of the electrical coil 24 and current provided to the electrical coil 24, the control module 60 may advantageously modify the activation signal 75 to the fuel injector 10 for multiple consecutive injection events. It will be understood that conventional fuel injectors controlled by open loop operation, are based solely upon a desired current waveform obtained from look-up tables, without any information related to the force producing component of the flux linkage (e.g., magnetic flux) affecting movement of the armature portion 21. As a result, conventional feed-forward fuel injectors that only account for current flow for controlling the fuel injector may be susceptible to instability in consecutive fuel injection events that are closely-spaced.
It is known when the injector driver 50 only provides current uni-directionally in a positive first direction to energize the electrical coil 24, releasing the current to remain stable at zero will result in the magnetic flux within the fuel injector to gradually decay, e.g., taper off, towards zero. However, the response time for the magnetic flux to decay is slow, and the presence of magnetic hysteresis within the fuel injector often results in the presence of residual flux when a subsequent closely-spaced fuel injection event is initiated. As aforementioned, the presence of the residual flux impacts the accuracy of the fuel flow rate and injected fuel mass to be delivered in a subsequent closely-spaced fuel injection event.
The injector driver 50 receives DC electric power from the power source 40 of
The injector driver 50 is configured to control activation of the fuel injector 10 by generating suitable injector activation signals 75. The injector driver 50 is a bi-directional current driver providing positive current flow via a first current flow path 352 and negative current flow via a second current flow path 354 to the electrical coil 24 in response to respective injector activation signals 75. The positive current via the first current flow path 352 is provided to energize an electrical coil 24 and the negative current via the second current flow path 354 reverses current flow to draw current from the electrical coil 24. Current flow paths 352 and 354 form a closed loop; that is, a positive current into 352 results in an equal and opposite (negative) current in flow path 354, and vice versa. Signal flow path 371 can provide a voltage of the first current flow path 352 to the control module 60 and signal flow path 373 can provide a voltage of the second current flow path 354 to the control module 60. The voltage and current applied to the electrical coil 24 is based on a difference between the voltages at the signal flow paths 371 and 373. In one embodiment, the injector driver 50 utilizes open loop operation to control activation of the fuel injector 10, wherein the injector activation signals are characterized by precise predetermined current waveforms. In another embodiment, the injector driver 50 utilizes closed loop operation to control activation of the fuel injector 10, wherein the injector activation signals are based upon fuel injector parameters provided as feedback to the control module, via the signal flow paths 371 and 373. A measured current flow to the coil 24 can be provided to the control module 60, via signal flow path 356. In the illustrated embodiment, the current flow is measured by a current sensor on the second current flow path 354. The fuel injector parameters may include flux linkage, voltage and current values within the fuel injector 10 or the fuel injector parameters may include proxies used by the control module 60 to estimate flux linkage, voltage and current within the fuel injector 10.
In some embodiments, the injector driver 50 is configured for full four quadrant operation.
In some embodiments, the negative current for drawing current from the electrical coil 24 is applied for a sufficient duration for reducing residual flux within the fuel injector 10 after current is released. In other embodiments, the negative current is applied subsequent to release of the current but additionally only after the fuel injector has closed or actuator has returned to its static or rest position. Moreover, additional embodiments can include the switch sets 370 and 372 to be alternately switched between open and closed positions to alternate the direction of the current flow to the coil 24, including pulse width modulation control to effect current flow profiles. The utilization of two switch sets 370 and 372 allows for precise control of current flow direction and amplitude applied to the current flow paths 352 and 354 of the electrical coil 24 for multiple consecutive fuel injection events during an engine event by reducing the presence of eddy currents and magnetic hysteresis within the electrical coil 24.
Referring to the first plot 1000, measured current and flow rate profiles 1011, 1012, respectively, are illustrated for the two fuel injection events. The vertical y-axis along the left side of plot 1000 denotes electrical current in Amperage (A) and the vertical y-axis along the right side of plot 1000 denotes fuel flow rate in milligrams (mg) per milliseconds (ms). The measured current profile 1011 is substantially identical for each of the fuel injection events. Likewise, the measured fuel flow rate profile 1012 is substantially identical for each of the fuel injection events due to the fuel injection events not indicative of being closely-spaced.
Referring to the second plot 1010, measured main excitation coil and search coil voltage profiles 1013, 1014, respectively, are illustrated for the two fuel injection events. The measured main coil voltage may represent a measured voltage of the electromagnetic coil 24 of
Referring to the first plot 1020, measured current and flow rate profiles 1021, 1022, respectively, are illustrated for the two fuel injection events. The vertical y-axis along the left side of plot 1020 denotes electrical current in Amperage (A) and the vertical y-axis along the right side of plot 1020 denotes fuel flow rate in milligrams (mg) per millisecond (ms). The measured current profile 1021 is substantially identical for each of the fuel injection events. However, the measured flow rate profile 1022 illustrates a variation in the measured fuel flow rate between each of the first and second fuel injection events even though the measured current profiles are substantially identical. This variance in the measured fuel flow rate is inherent in closely-spaced fuel injection events and undesirably results in an injected fuel mass delivered at the second fuel injection event that is different than an injected fuel mass delivered at the first fuel injection event.
Referring to the second plot 1030, measured main excitation coil and search coil voltage profiles 1023, 1024, respectively, are illustrated for the two fuel injection events. The measured main coil voltage may represent a measured voltage of the electrical coil 24 of
A start of injection (SOI) time and an end of injection (EOI) time can each be sensed based upon discernible changes in monitored parameters of the fuel injection. The SOI time is indicative of a time point whereat the injector begins to open for delivering fuel (release from rest position). The SOI time can interchangeably be referred to as an actual injector opening time. In some embodiments, the SOI time corresponds to a time point indicating a discernible decrease in the fuel pressure 34 proximal to the fuel injector. However, this disclosure is not limited to any one method for determining the SOI time, and any method can be utilized to obtain the SOI time such as by referencing residual voltage. As aforementioned, fuel pressure can be measured by the fuel sensor 32 at the fuel rail 30 of
In a closely spaced multiple small quantity injection system, the second and subsequent fuel injections become unstable due to the secondary magnetic effects such as eddy currents and hysteresis (residual flux). With conventional injector drives using only current control it is difficult to achieve stable multiple fuel injections making the scheme not very effective. In addition, the fuel mass injected in a fixed pulse with single or multi-pulse injection is not deterministic due to injector-to-injector variability. In the conventional current regulated system, as aforementioned, the valve closing event is correlated with an inflection point in the induced voltage of the injector driver coil after the coil current is shut-off and reduced to zero. This results in significant delay between the voltage inflection point and the valve closing instant. In current regulated systems using reverse current drive the valve closing delay is reduced, however, this non-optimum reverse current drive results in poor correlation of the valve closing instant to the peak reverse current point or the coil voltage inflection point. Additionally, determination of the valve closing time based on voltage inflection point requires complex signal processing with higher order derivatives and may be susceptible to noise and injector design variations.
By determining an optimum drive signal for a fuel injector such that the valve closing event correlates directly with a predetermined level of the drive signal a more precise fuel rate control is enabled. In a preferred embodiment, the valve closing event correlates directly with the instant of the injector coil current reaching an optimum peak reverse current. This enables precision fuel metering and injection control, minimizes calibration requirements of fuel delivery control and simplifies controller hardware and software requirements. Additionally, it may potentially reduce fuel consumption and emissions.
An optimum injector drive utilizes a driver that is capable of applying injector coil current and/or voltage in a first direction for opening the valve and in a direction opposite to the first direction after the injector has been commanded off. An exemplary driver is an H-bridge driver with 4 solid-state switches with free-wheeling diodes across them. One embodiment of this exemplary driver is depicted in
It is conceivable that the predetermined reverse current can be a function of the injector design, operating fuel line pressure, the supply voltage, injection duration and the spacing between successive injections. With the predetermined reverse current so selected, the closing instant of the valve is directly correlated to the instant the coil current reaches the predetermined level in the reverse direction. In an exemplary embodiment, the opening instant of the valve may be correlated to the instant the valve current reaches its peak value in the first direction. Thus the actual injection duration may be directly correlated to the time difference between the instants where the injector coil current reached its peak value in a first direction and the predetermined peak current in the second, reverse direction.
A fuel injection event can be indicative of being stable if the residual voltage inflection point 414 repeatedly occurs at or around a same time point in each engine cycle. However, a fuel injection event can be indicative of being unstable if the residual voltage inflection point 414 occurs at non-repeating, or otherwise inconsistent, time points between each engine cycle. In other words a variable residual voltage inflection point 414 indicating that the residual voltage inflection point varies from engine cycle to engine cycle can indicate that the corresponding fuel injection event is unstable. Unstable fuel injection events undesirably result in deviations from a desired injected fuel mass to be delivered at the fuel injection event during the engine cycles. Generally, when a plurality of fuel injection events during each of a plurality of engine cycles are indicative of being closely-spaced, one or more fuel injection events subsequent to the first fuel injection event can result in deviations from a desired injected fuel mass. Additionally, the EOI time determined from the residual voltage inflection point and the obtained SOI time determined from the discernible change in fuel pressure or other method, can be utilized to calculate an actual injector duration such that the injected fuel mass actually delivered can be estimated.
The duration of the reverse voltage after the injector has been commanded off is determined based on the time it takes the coil current to reach a predetermined value in the reverse direction. The predetermined reverse current may be determined using various methods. In one embodiment, the predetermined reverse current is so selected that when the reverse voltage is switched off at the instant the reverse current reaches said predetermined value in the reverse direction, the coil voltage returns to zero in the shortest time without having any further undershoot after being clamped in the forward direction at the supply voltage until the current is reduced to zero. In another embodiment, the predetermined reverse current is so selected that when the reverse voltage is switched off at the instant the reverse current reaches the predetermined value in the reverse direction, the flux linking the coil reaches a predetermined value in the second direction within a predetermined time.
TABLE 1
BLOCK
BLOCK CONTENTS
902
Start on cylinder event, set ΔIp(0) = 0; Irev = Irev
904
t = Tp1?
906
Read Ip1
908
Store Ip1
910
t = Tp1 + Tevent?
912
Read Ip2
914
Store Ip2
916
ΔIp(n) = Ip1 − Ip2
918
Irev(n) = Irev(n − 1) + kp[ΔIp(n) − ΔIp(n − 1)] + kp * Ts * ΔIp(n)
920
ΔIp(n − 1) = ΔIp(n)
922
Return
The flowchart 900 begins with a start on cylinder event at block 902 and the initial peak current ΔIp(0) is set to 0 and the reverse current Irev is set to Irev_min. At block 904 the time t is monitored and it is determined whether the time is equal to the time a peak current is achieved Tp1 in a first injection event of multiple injection events. If t=Tp1 the flowchart proceeds to block 906 where the peak current at the first injection event Ip1 is read and then stored at block 908. If time t is not equal to Tp1 at block 904 then the time continues to be monitored until t=Tp1. Once the peak current at the first injection event has been read and stored the flowchart proceeds to block 910 where the time t is monitored and it is determined whether the time is equal to the time the peak current is achieved in a first injection event Tp1 plus the time of the injection event Tevent, which is the amount of time between the time of the peak current in the first injection event and the time of the peak current in a second injection event Tp2. Accordingly, the peak current in the second injection event Tp2 is achieved when t=Tp1+Tevent. If t=Tp1+Tevent the flowchart proceeds to block 912 where the peak current at the second injection event Ip2 is read and then stored at block 914. If time t is not equal to Tp1+Tevent at block 910 then the time continues to be monitored until t=Tp1+Tevent. Once the peak current at the second injection event Ip2 is read and then stored at block 914 the flowchart proceeds to block 916 where the change in peak current between the injection events ΔIp(n) is set to the difference between the peak current at the first injection event Ip1 and the peak current at the second injection event Ip2. At block 918 digital proportional-integral control is utilized to drive error in a positive peak current to zero. This may be expressed by the following relationship.
Irev(n)=Irev(n−1)+kp[ΔIp(n)−ΔIp(n−1)]+kl×Ts×ΔIp(n) [1]
At each iteration n the reverse current Irev (n) is determined based on this proportional integral control relationship wherein kp and ki, denote the coefficients for the proportional and integral terms respectively. This will drive the error in successive positive peak current levels to zero. Accordingly the resulting drive signal based on this predetermined reverse current will be enable precision fuel metering and injection control over multiple closely spaced injection events.
At block 920 the change in peak current of the current injection event ΔIp(n) is set equal to the change in peak current of a previous iteration ΔIp(n−1). At block 922 the process returns and may be executed again for a subsequent injection event.
The disclosure has described certain preferred embodiments and modifications thereto. Further modifications and alterations may occur to others upon reading and understanding the specification. Therefore, it is intended that the disclosure not be limited to the particular embodiment(s) disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this disclosure, but that the disclosure will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Namuduri, Chandra S., Nehl, Thomas W., Gopalakrishnan, Suresh, Omekanda, Avoki M.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10823101, | Nov 05 2019 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | System and method for learning an injector compensation |
11313338, | Nov 20 2020 | Caterpillar Inc | Method and system for monitoring injector valves |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2748322, | |||
4516184, | Dec 29 1981 | Noboru, Tominari; Mikuni Kohyo Co., Inc. | Circuit device for driving electromagnetically movable unit at high speed with single power source |
5287048, | May 22 1992 | Fasco Industries, Inc. | Electronic gas valve power interruption switch |
9435281, | Apr 04 2014 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Method for reducing performance variation of an electromagnetically-activated actuator |
9500835, | Mar 12 2014 | Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. | Apparatus for driving actuator of camera module in mobile device |
9624883, | Mar 20 2014 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Smart actuator for plug and play |
9932947, | Mar 20 2014 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Actuator with residual magnetic hysteresis reset |
20120316755, | |||
20150264237, | |||
20150267660, | |||
20150267661, | |||
20150285175, | |||
20150377173, | |||
20170179865, | |||
20170204805, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Apr 22 2016 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Apr 22 2016 | NAMUDURI, CHANDRA S | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 038453 | /0211 | |
Apr 22 2016 | GOPALAKRISHNAN, SURESH | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 038453 | /0211 | |
Apr 22 2016 | OMEKANDA, AVOKI M | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 038453 | /0211 | |
Apr 22 2016 | NEHL, THOMAS W | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 038453 | /0211 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 20 2022 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 28 2021 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Feb 28 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 28 2022 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 28 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 28 2025 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Feb 28 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 28 2026 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 28 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 28 2029 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Feb 28 2030 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 28 2030 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 28 2032 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |