A nanoimprint system and methods for separating imprinted substrates with nano-scale patterns from mold for manufacturing. Generally, the system includes means to create, monitor, and control relative movement between the mold and substrate for separation. It is capable of controlling where and when the separation happens and finishes. The relative movement may be generated by motion stages, springs, stage driven flexures, inflatable O-rings, gas flow, and other mechanical means. It may be monitored by separation force, overhead camera, and vacuum/pressures in different area of the system. The relative movement may be any combination of stages movements and movement sequences. The separation speed, direction, and force can be well controlled in the system to achieve fast and reliable separation between mold and substrate, and at the same time maintain the pattern shape and details on the consolidated imprint resist.
|
1. A system for patterning substrate surfaces, comprising:
a mold having a molding surface with a patterning area;
a mold holder releasably coupled to the mold;
a substrate having a molding surface not smaller than the patterning area of the mold, wherein the molding surface comprises a moldable material disposed thereon;
a stage having the substrate disposed thereon, wherein at least one of the mold holder and the stage comprise means for moving between a first position wherein the mold holder and the stage comprise a gap therebetween, and a second position wherein the molding surface of the substrate and the patterning area of the mold are in contact;
one or more contact force sensors positioned along the system for sensing one or more forces;
a pressure regulator fluidly coupled to the system;
a gas reservoir fluidly coupled to a chamber containing the mold holder and the stage, wherein upon delivery of a high pressure gas from the gas reservoir to the chamber when the mold holder and the multi-axis stage are in the second position the molding surface of the mold is pressed against the molding surface of the substrate, thereby imprinting a nano-scale pattern or a micro-scale pattern onto the molding surface;
at least one vacuum pump fluidly connected to the chamber;
a material dispensing system constructed and arranged to dispense the moldable material on the substrate;
two or more rollers constructed and arranged to move at least one of the substrate and the mold; and
a light source and reflective optics constructed and arranged to expose the substrate to light.
2. The system of
3. The system of
4. The system of
5. The system of
6. The system of
7. The system of
8. The system of
9. The system of
10. The system of
11. The system of
a housing with one open end;
a light reflector;
lens for focusing and expanding light;
a UV light source, a thermal light source, or a combination thereof; and
at least an opening hole for fluid coupling to the gas reservoir.
13. The system of
14. The system of
17. The system of
21. The system of
|
This application is a National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US14/30655, filed on Mar. 17, 2014, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Applications Nos. 61/791,491, 61/799,681, and 61/799,856, each of which were filed on Mar. 15, 2013, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present disclosure relates to system and methods for roller imprint lithography. It is particularly useful for fast mass production of substrates with replication of patterns from a mold having microscale or nanoscale features by imprint lithography, including roller imprint lithography.
The statements in this section merely provide background information related to the present disclosure and may not constitute prior art.
Nanoimprint lithography, also often called imprint lithography, is capable of replicating patterns on a pre-made mold as small as several nanometers. The pre-made mold has extruded areas and recessed areas on its replication surface, which constitute patterns of various shapes and sizes. The mold was typically made by a patterning step using electron beam lithography (EBL) or mixing of EBL and optical lithography, and, a follow-up etching step using reactive ion etching (RIE) to create the patterns. Nanoimprint lithography starts from applying a volume of polymer onto a substrate by either spinning or dispensing. The polymer is either flowable in ambient temperature, or, from rigid to deformable or flowable by thermally heating. Then, the pre-made mold is positioned to contact with the substrate. After that, the mold is pressed against the substrate. If the polymer is in liquid in ambient temperature, pressing the mold against the substrate will force the surface extrusion areas on the mold replication surface to go into the layer of the polymer. If the polymer is rigid in ambient temperature, a thermally heating step is conducted prior to the contact, after the contact but before the pressing, or during the pressing to make the polymer deformable or flowable. Thus, pressing the mold against the mold is able to force the surface extrusion areas on the mold replication surface to go into the layer of the polymer. When the extruded areas completely go into the layer of the polymer, the polymer is transited from deformable or flowable into rigid by UV radiation, thermally heating or thermally cooling depending on types of the polymer. At last, the mold is released from the substrate while the layer of the polymer attaches to the substrate. To prevent the polymer from sticking to the mold, a very thin release coating may be deposited on the replication surface of the mold. Typical release coating included surface release surfactant and per-fluoro polymer deposited by CVD. After the substrate is separated from the mold, the extrusion areas on the mold surface are corresponding to the recessed areas in the polymer layer. Therefore, a reverse-tone replication of the patterns on the mold is formed onto the polymer film on the substrate. The polymer may be a thermo-plastic polymer or curable polymer. A thermo-plastic polymer transits from rigid to deformable or flowable when being heated above its glass transition temperature, and, vice versus when is cooled below its glass transition temperature. A curable polymer is deformable or flowable originally, and transit to rigid when being heating to curing temperature for thermo-set type or being cured under UV exposure for UV-curable type. When alignment is needed, the mold is aligned with the substrate through a set of matching align markers prior to the contact. Previously, electron beam lithography is very slow to write nanoscale patterns. It is unlikely to use it for mass production of nanoscale devices. Nanoimprint lithography is able to replicate whole area of patterned surface of the pre-made mold onto the substrate by one cycle of the process. It can dramatically increase the efficiency of patterning nanoscale features. Because the mold is repeatedly used for many cycles of imprinting, the high cost of using electron beam lithography to make the mold is averaged into these many imprints. Nanoimprint lithography delivers a practical method to produce nanoscale devices at low cost.
Since its invention in 1995 by Stephen Y. Chou (referring to U.S. Pat. No. 5,772,905), nanoimprint lithography has successfully demonstrated its capability of replicating a feature as small as 5 nm. Meanwhile, many research works were carried out on developing resists for imprinting, mold making techniques, mold release coating for clean separation, and apparatus to do imprinting. In overall, nanoimprint lithography has evolved into being a widely used technology for research laboratories, but not reached a stage ready to meet much higher requirements of industrial use. One of the improvements needed for industrial use is an effective method to separate imprinted substrate from mold with high throughput and no damage to the patterns.
Fast nanoimprint apparatus with capability to separate mold and substrate automatically is highly demanded by semiconductor, magnetic media, and other industries to use this technology to manufacture micro-scale and nano-scale device products. Previously a fast nanoimprint apparatus was used to deform the mold to separate it from the substrate after imprint. (patent application Ser. No. 13/011,844) The setup was placed in a chamber where a deformable mold is fixed firmly around its full periphery. In the patent, the mold has to be deformable, which limits the thickness and material of the mold to be used. The loading and unloading of the mold is difficult giving the fact that the periphery of the mold are fixed firmly. In addition, the separation motion of the substrate is in the Z direction only. There is nothing to monitor the separation process, which could be important in a manufacturing environment.
Nanoimprint lithography, also often called imprint lithography, is capable of replicating patterns on a pre-made mold as small as several nanometers. The pre-made mold has extruded areas and recessed areas on its replication surface, which constitute patterns of various shapes and sizes. The mold was typically made by a patterning step using electron beam lithography (EBL) or mixing of EBL and optical lithography, and, a follow-up etching step using reactive ion etching (RIE) to create the patterns. Nanoimprint lithography starts from applying a volume of polymer onto a substrate by either spinning or dispensing. The polymer is either flowable in ambient temperature, or, from rigid to deformable or flowable by thermally heating. Then, the pre-made mold is positioned to contact with the substrate. After that, the mold is pressed against the substrate. If the polymer is in liquid in ambient temperature, pressing the mold against the substrate will force the surface extrusion areas on the mold replication surface to go into the layer of the polymer. If the polymer is rigid in ambient temperature, a thermally heating step is conducted prior to the contact, after the contact but before the pressing, or during the pressing to make the polymer deformable or flowable. Thus, pressing the mold against the mold is able to force the surface extrusion areas on the mold replication surface to go into the layer of the polymer. When the extruded areas completely go into the layer of the polymer, the polymer is transited from deformable or flowable into rigid by UV radiation, thermally heating or thermally cooling depending on types of the polymer. At last, the mold is released from the substrate while the layer of the polymer attaches to the substrate. To prevent the polymer from sticking to the mold, a very thin release coating may be deposited on the replication surface of the mold. Typical release coating included surface release surfactant and per-fluoro polymer deposited by CVD. After the substrate is separated from the mold, the extrusion areas on the mold surface are corresponding to the recessed areas in the polymer layer. Therefore, a reverse-tone replication of the patterns on the mold is formed onto the polymer film on the substrate. The polymer may be a thermo-plastic polymer or curable polymer. A thermo-plastic polymer transits from rigid to deformable or flowable when being heated above its glass transition temperature, and, vice versus when is cooled below its glass transition temperature. A curable polymer is deformable or flowable originally, and transit to rigid when being heating to curing temperature for thermo-set type or being cured under UV exposure for UV-curable type. When alignment is needed, the mold is aligned with the substrate through a set of matching align markers prior to the contact. Previously, electron beam lithography is very slow to write nanoscale patterns. It is unlikely to use it for mass production of nanoscale devices. Nanoimprint lithography is able to replicate whole area of patterned surface of the pre-made mold onto the substrate by one cycle of the process. It can dramatically increase the efficiency of patterning nanoscale features. Because the mold is repeatedly used for many cycles of imprinting, the high cost of using electron beam lithography to make the mold is averaged into these many imprints. Nanoimprint lithography delivers a practical method to produce nanoscale devices at low cost.
Since its invention in 1995 by Stephen Y. Chou (referring to U.S. Pat. No. 5,772,905), nanoimprint lithography has successfully demonstrated its capability of replicating a feature as small as 5 nm. Meanwhile, many research works were carried out on developing resists for imprinting, mold making techniques, mold release coating for clean separation, and apparatus to do imprinting. In overall, nanoimprint lithography has evolved into being a widely used technology for research laboratories, but not reached a stage ready to meet much higher requirements of industrial use. One of the improvements needed by industrial use is imprint system and method with high throughput and overlay accuracy.
Fast nanoimprint apparatus is highly demanded by semiconductor, magnetic media, and optics industries to use this technology to manufacture nano-scale device products. However, traditional nanoimprint lithography is still improving the throughput, and certain application requires very large (a few meters) substrate, which is difficult for traditional nanoimprint lithography to provide.
Roller Imprint Lithography, offering a much simpler nanoimprint lithography machine design, much higher throughput, and lower cost, is a very attractive alternative to traditional nanoimprint. Since its invention in 1998 (Referring to “Roller Nanoimprint Lithography” paper on J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16(6)), various research efforts have been dedicated to the roller nanoimprint. To fully utilize the potential of the roller nanoimprint, some of the key areas still need further improvement. These include: a) to make an ultra-high quality and uniform imprint; b) have ways to place on a roller with microscale or nanoscale patterns which can then continuously imprint the substrate.
Optical lithography techniques are currently used to make most microelectronic devices. However, it is believed that these methods are reaching their limits in resolution. Sub-micron scale lithography has been a critical process in the microelectronics industry. The use of sub-micron scale lithography allows manufacturers to meet the increased demand for smaller and more densely packed electronic circuits on chips. It is expected that the microelectronics industry will pursue structures that are as small as or smaller than about 50 nm. Further, there are emerging applications of nanometer scale lithography in the areas of opto-electronics and magnetic storage. For example, photonic crystals and high-density patterned magnetic memory of the order of terabytes per square inch may require sub-100 nm scale lithography.
For making sub-50 nm structures, optical lithography techniques may require the use of very short wavelengths of light (e.g., about 13.2 nm). At these short wavelengths, many common materials are not optically transparent and therefore imaging systems typically have to be constructed using complicated reflective optics. Furthermore, obtaining a light source that has sufficient output intensity at these wavelengths is difficult. Such systems lead to extremely complicated equipment and processes that may be prohibitively expensive. It is also believed that high-resolution e-beam lithography techniques, though very precise, are too slow for high-volume commercial applications.
Nanoimprint lithography, also often called imprint lithography, is capable of replicating patterns on a pre-made mold as small as several nanometers. The pre-made mold has extruded areas and recessed areas on its replication surface, which constitute patterns of various shapes and sizes. The mold was typically made by a patterning step using electron beam lithography (EBL) or mixing of EBL and optical lithography, and, a follow-up etching step using reactive ion etching (RIE) to create the patterns. Nanoimprint lithography starts from applying a volume of polymer onto a substrate by either spinning or dispensing. The polymer is either flowable in ambient temperature, or, from rigid to deformable or flowable by thermally heating. Then, the pre-made mold is positioned to contact with the substrate. After that, the mold is pressed against the substrate. If the polymer is in liquid in ambient temperature, pressing the mold against the substrate will force the surface extrusion areas on the mold replication surface to go into the layer of the polymer. If the polymer is rigid in ambient temperature, a thermally heating step is conducted prior to the contact, after the contact but before the pressing, or during the pressing to make the polymer deformable or flowable. Thus, pressing the mold against the mold is able to force the surface extrusion areas on the mold replication surface to go into the layer of the polymer. When the extruded areas completely go into the layer of the polymer, the polymer is transited from deformable or flowable into rigid by UV radiation, thermally heating or thermally cooling depending on types of the polymer. At last, the mold is released from the substrate while the layer of the polymer attaches to the substrate. To prevent the polymer from sticking to the mold, a very thin release coating may be deposited on the replication surface of the mold. Typical release coating included surface release surfactant and per-fluoro polymer deposited by CVD. After the substrate is separated from the mold, the extrusion areas on the mold surface are corresponding to the recessed areas in the polymer layer. Therefore, a reverse-tone replication of the patterns on the mold is formed onto the polymer film on the substrate. The polymer may be a thermo-plastic polymer or curable polymer. A thermo-plastic polymer transits from rigid to deformable or flowable when being heated above its glass transition temperature, and, vice versus when is cooled below its glass transition temperature. A curable polymer is deformable or flowable originally, and transit to rigid when being heating to curing temperature for thermo-set type or being cured under UV exposure for UV-curable type. When alignment is needed, the mold is aligned with the substrate through a set of matching align markers prior to the contact. Previously, electron beam lithography is very slow to write nanoscale patterns. It is unlikely to use it for mass production of nanoscale devices. Nanoimprint lithography is able to replicate whole area of patterned surface of the pre-made mold onto the substrate by one cycle of the process. It can dramatically increase the efficiency of patterning nanoscale features. Because the mold is repeatedly used for many cycles of imprinting, the high cost of using electron beam lithography to make the mold is averaged into these many imprints. Nanoimprint lithography delivers a practical method to produce nanoscale devices at low cost.
Since its invention in 1995 by Stephen Y. Chou (referring to U.S. Pat. No. 5,772,905), nanoimprint lithography has successfully demonstrated its capability of replicating a feature as small as 5 nm. Meanwhile, many research works were carried out on developing resists for imprinting, mold making techniques, mold release coating for clean separation, and apparatus to do imprinting. Overall nanoimprint lithography has evolved into being a widely used technology for research laboratories, but not reached a stage ready to meet much higher requirements of industrial use. One of the needed improvements however as identified by the present inventors is for industrial use is step and repeat imprint system and method with good imprint uniformity, high throughput and overlay accuracy.
The embodiments of this disclosure include systems and methods to separate substrates from mold after imprint resist solidification. Generally, the system has an apparatus to hold mold and an apparatus to hold substrate. A hollow mold holder is fixed to the top inner surface of the chamber and positioned underneath the transparent top section. By changing the type of mold holders used in the system, molds of different materials or different sizes and thicknesses may be fixed to the mold holder and carry out imprint. More specifically, transparent, semi-transparent or opaque molds (all referring to visible wavelength) may be used in the system for nanoimprint. An enclosed volume referring to mold mini-chamber is formed between the mold/holder and top wall of the chamber. Inside chamber, a stage assembly, leveling apparatus, and force sensing apparatus are installed. A chuck to vacuum hold a substrate is mounted on top of the stage assembly. At beginning of the imprinting, the substrate with a layer of resist is positioned underneath the mold at a predetermined gap between them. Then, the substrate is moved up to contact with the mold either under vacuum, under atmosphere or under pressure from a mixture of different gases. The substrate and mold may be pressed further by introducing higher pressure inside the chamber. After consolidating the resist, the substrate is separated from the mold by motions enabled by stage movements, or by deforming the mold enabled by differential pressure between the mold mini-chamber and the bulk volume of the chamber, or a mixing of both.
The disclosed systems, apparatuses and methods relate to high throughput and high speed continuous producing of micro-scale and nano-scale patterns using roller nanoimprint lithography (RNIL). Generally, the roller system is modular: it has a section for resist coating and a section for nanoimprint. Unwinding roller and rewinding roller are located on the two ends of the system.
The key component of the system is a special designed Air Cushion Press (ACP) head with UV/Thermal heating source. It is capable of applying fluid pressure at the same time curing the resists. At the nanoimprint section, the mold will contact with the substrate with an adjustable base pressure. The ACP head will apply a uniform pressure where the resist is cured.
This disclosure demonstrated ways to apply air cushion press to six forms of roller molds and substrates, which includes rigid flat mold, roller mold, flexible mold, rigid substrate, and flexible substrate.
This disclosure also demonstrated ways to apply resist coating on the substrate surface. A resist coating wheel may be used to contact the resist first, and then rotate to contact substrate, bring the resist to the surface of substrate. A resist thickness controller will be able to control the resist coated. A different coating method uses dispensing head to place low viscosity (0.1-200 cP) resist droplets on the surface of substrate. Vapor treatment may be used to help the adhesion.
This disclosure further demonstrated five different ways to pattern roller molds with micro-scale and nano-scale features.
This disclosed system and methods include forming a layer on a region of a substrate. It includes, inter alia, positioning a liquid on a substrate and contacting the liquid with the mold to carry out imprint. Upon separation, the process will continue until all regions of the substrate are patterned by the mold. Substrates with micro-scale and nano-scale patterns can be mass produced using the system and methods.
A multi-axis robot is used to transfer the imprint molds and substrates to the chamber. Multiple and different end effectors may be mounted on the same robot to handle molds and substrates of different form factors. Positions and orientations of molds and substrates may be adjusted at different stations in the system. Before imprint, the molds are adjusted with the patterned side facing down, while the substrates are adjusted with the patterned side facing up. After all the imprints are finished, the molds may be adjusted with the patterned side facing up before placing back into the mold cassette.
Further aspects of the present disclosure will be in part apparent and in part pointed out below. It should be understood that various aspects of the disclosure may be implemented individually or in combination with one another. It should also be understood that the detailed description and drawings, while indicating certain exemplary embodiments, are intended for purposes of illustration only and should not be construed as limiting the scope of the disclosure.
The features, nature and advantages of this disclosure will be more clearly understood by consideration of the illustrative embodiments now to be described in detail in connection with the accompanying drawing. In the drawing:
It is to be understood that these drawings are for purposes of illustrating the concept of the invention and are not to scale.
It should be understood that throughout the drawings, corresponding reference numerals indicate like or corresponding parts and features.
The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present disclosure or the disclosure's applications or uses.
The descriptions assume that UV curable imprint is conducted if it is not clearly identified and UV curable imprint is used as example. However, the invention does not limit for UV curable imprint and also apply for thermo-plastic imprint. An ordinary skilled in the art that is familiar with nanoimprint technology can easily revise the embodiment described in the invention to implement the concept of the invention for all type of imprinting.
The overall separation process of the system is illustrated in
In accordance with the concept of the invention, referring to
A chuck 230 with vacuum grooves on its top surface is mounted on a force sensing apparatus 220 which in turn is mounted on the stage assembly 210. A substrate 300 for imprinting is held on chuck 230 by vacuum pumping through the vacuum grooves. Additionally, apparatus 225 is used to clamp the substrate long the plane X-Y by mechanical means. Surface of chuck 230 are designed and specially polished in order to hold the substrates with minimum deformation. The stage assembly is either mechanically installed or capable of moving the substrate within its X-Y travel ranges to superimpose the center of the substrate with the center of patterned region 310 in X-Y plane. The substrate may have a moldable material 340 applied on its side surface facing the mold before imprint begins. The moldable material could be a continuous film layer of imprinting resist spun on or a plurality of droplets of imprinting resist dispensed on. When the moldable material is in form of a plurality of droplets before imprinting, the distribution of the droplets could be a uniform matrix of equal spacing among adjacent droplets along one direction or multi directions, or an arbitrary matrix optimized for merging each to achieve desired imprinted patterns. In additional to these general demands for imprinting, the special distribution of droplets is preferred to deliver a uniform and continuous contacting interface between the mold and the substrate during the imprint process of the apparatus.
Referring to
Next step of the imprint process is to pump chamber volume 150 and mold mini-chamber 160 to remove air. This pumping step facilitates to reduce trapped air defects of imprinted patterns. Alternatively, an extra pneumatic line is equipped with the machine which allows special gas with fast diffusion such as Helium to be used to facilitate the removal of air in the chamber.
Aligning the substrate with the mold can be finished before the pumping or in the pumping. Normally, aligning the substrate and the mold is accomplished by positioning an align marker on the substrate overlapping with a matching align marker on the mold under microscopes. To prevent possible shift of the substrate on chuck 230 during the pumping, both the substrate and mold are mechanically clamped in positions. By using the vertical microscope and alignment marks on the substrate and mold, the substrate is first moved to coarsely align with the mold. This will remove the small error generated during loading and machine assembling, and make sure the fine alignment marks on the mold and substrate are located in the same field of view, therefore no further searching of alignment marks necessary, significantly improving the alignment speed and reliability, which are required for manufacturing. Microscopes will then read mis-alignments at different locations by using the fine alignment marks. The finer X, Y, and rotation error can be corrected by substrate stages 210 and further by substrate stages 229.
Referring to
Referring to step 503 of
Another advantage of proposed method is the mold used for the apparatus may or may not need to be deformable under a reasonable differential pressure between its two sides. The mold could be made of quartz, glass, polymer, semiconductor, metal or a mixture of some of the above materials regardless of the thickness. One example of the molds uses 150 mm by 150 mm quartz substrate with a thickness of 6.35 mm; One example of the molds uses 200 mm diameter Silicon substrate with a thickness of 0.1-2 mm; yet one more example of the molds uses 8″ diameter quartz or glass wafer with a substrate thickness of 0.2-1 mm; another example of the mold uses 12″ diameter quartz or glass wafer with a substrate thickness of 0.2-2 mm; one more example of the mold uses 8″ diameter Ni substrate with a thickness of 0.1-1 mm.
Yet another advantage of the method is there is no requirement on the relative sizes and thickness of the mold and substrate. The mold can be bigger, smaller, or the same size as the substrate. There is no requirement on their respective thickness as well.
One more advantage of the method is it does not require the pressure difference for separation. Therefore it is not necessary to have a chamber. The chamber in the invention is only used for imprint purpose.
The relative movement for separation may also be generated by springs, stage driven flexures, inflatable O-rings and other mechanical means. The relative movement may also be generated by gas flow. When one corner of the mold/substrate is started to separate, gas flow can be introduced in between mold/substrate, preferably vertical to the direction of separation front. The flow rate and gas pressure can be controlled for best result. A mixture of above methods will work. For example, an inflatable O-ring (in the mold holder, mold, or substrate holder) may push locally the corner of the imprinted die to create an initial separation. Then an air flow, preferably vertical to the separation front line, can be used to assist the propagation of the separation.
The current method is also capable of telling when the separation is finished. The separation completion may be detected by vacuum of system and mold/substrate holders: for example, when vacuum levels of mold/substrate holders suddenly get better, it typically means a separation. The separation may also be detected by the recorded force during separation. It may also be detected by processing the camera images from top view of the die area and locating the separation front line. A combination of these methods will give reliable indication of the separation.
Referring to
The system described here also has an additional function: it is capable of separating the mold from substrate by deforming the mold, as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/011,844. This separation method may be combined with the stage peeling method to further facilitate the separation process. With a chamber existing, current system structure also allows for the automatic robotic arms to load the mold into the chamber, and unload the mold from the chamber, something difficult in previous patent application. Therefore we are proposing an imprint system capable of bending mold for separation, peel substrate for separation, and a mixture of both. The chamber, the mini-chamber and the substrate chuck are all fluid connected to separated gas lines, so their pressure and vacuum, and gas flow may be well individually controlled. There is a high pressure gas reservoir, regulators, vacuum pump source, manifold as well used in the system.
The improvements possessed by the invention are emphasized again herein. The apparatus embodiments described in the invention accomplish a full cycle of imprinting inside the chamber through a process essentially involving separating the substrate from mold after imprint by the stage assembly. The speed to finish separation process is primarily decided by stage response. Using state-of-art stage technology, stage response can be very fast and capable of responding to requests in milliseconds. Furthermore, the method is compatible with the advantageous Air Cushion Press (ACP), which provides very uniform imprinting force crucial to achieve the pattern fidelity required by manufacturing.
It is to be understood that the above described embodiments are illustrative of only a few of the many embodiments that can represent applications of the invention. Numerous and varied other arrangements can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
In accordance with the concept of the invention, referring to
In the resist deposition section, different ways can be used to coat the substrate. The first method is to use a roller 800 to pick up resists from a reservoir. By rotating and contacting the roller with the substrate 820, resists can be transferred to the substrate. To further control the thickness and uniformity of the resist, a resist thickness controller 802 maybe used before imprint. Resist may also be dispensed on the substrate using a dispenser head 801. Typically a low viscosity resist (0.1-200 cP) may be used. The nozzle can be moved to have a gap of 0.1 mm-25 mm to the substrate for dispensing. Typical resist droplets have a volume of 1-100 pL. By using a dispensing head with multiple nozzles (16-256), and firing of droplets at >10 KHz, the droplets can be coated on the substrate on the fly, satisfying the high speed of roller imprint. As the width of the dispenser head is from 1″-4″, substrate with width wider than 4″ would need multiple heads. The firing frequency f (Hz) of the dispenser head and the moving speed v (m/s) of the roller substrate will determine the gap between droplets along substrate moving direction to be: v/f*1e6 (μm). To further assist the resist stickiness with the substrate, surface surfactant may be applied to the substrate before the coating. This can be easily done by a vapor treatment of the substrate. A heated surfactant reservoir is typically placed underneath the moving substrate for coating. The same vapor treatment method can also be used to coat the mold.
In the imprint section, substrate will be in contact with the mold 803. The base contact may be adjusted by a sensor and tightening adjustor 808. The fluid pressure can be applied by an Air Cushion Press (ACP) head 807. The ACP head can be placed very close to the imprinting roller where a very thin line of resists will be further imprinted by fluid pressure and then cured.
Various flexible materials may be used as the substrate or mold, organic materials including PET, ETFE, PVC, by way of example, may be used. Low tensile strength and high elongation are the general properties to look for while searching for new materials.
Referring to
The wavelength of UV is typically between 180-410 nm. Narrow band filters may be used in the light path to limit the wavelength. ˜365 nm light may be used for exposure. In addition, UV LED light source may also be used. It typically has a central wavelength of 365 nm or 400 nm. It has a long lifetime, constant power density, and can instantly be turned on and off.
If thermal heating source is to be used, the ACP head may need to be cooled, preferably by cooling water around the outside surface 910 of the head.
During imprint, the ACP head will be placed in close proximity to the substrate to be imprinted, at a preferred distance ranging from 0.001-5 mm. The pressure applied depends on the distance, and the input pressure. The system use high pressure reservoir, regulators, gas lines and vacuum to control the pressure. There will be a PC to drive all the control electronics to move the rollers at controlled speed, and control each section of the system to finish the imprint work and unwinding/winding. Sensors are mounted at different locations of the system to tell the pressures, the gap between parts etc. The rollers have a typical size of ˜1 inch diameter, although some individual rollers (including roller to mount mold or substrate) may have quite different sizes.
Fabricating roller mold is as important as roller imprint system. Without the roller mold, advantage of roller imprint will be greatly limited.
The improvements possessed by the invention are emphasized again herein. The apparatus embodiments described in the invention accomplish roller imprinting using gas pressure. The special design Air Cushion Press (ACP) of the process is carried out for roller nanoimprint. The ACP not only provides very uniform imprinting force to achieve high pattern transfer fidelity, but also reduces possible damage to the imprint molds and substrates, both are crucial for manufacturing. The invention also provides ways to fabricate the roller mold, which is crucial for the full potential of the roller imprint technology.
It is to be understood that the above described embodiments are illustrative of only a few of the many embodiments that can represent applications of the invention. Numerous and varied other arrangements can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The descriptions assume that UV curable imprint is conducted if it is not clearly identified and UV curable imprint is used as example. However, the invention does not limit for UV curable imprint and also apply for thermo-plastic imprint. An ordinary person skilled in the art who is familiar with nanoimprint technology can easily revise the embodiment described in this disclosure to implement the concept of this disclosure for all type of imprinting.
This disclosure includes a system which can carry out high throughput step-&-repeat imprint: system includes, among other things, loader, dispenser system (with replaceable cartridge, resist reservoir and pump), imprint system, magnification control, gas/vacuum control, motion stages.
In accordance with the concept of this disclosure, referring to
Both substrate 2550 and mold 2500 are held uniformly on their separate holders with minimum deformation. The substrate may be a standard 4″, 6″, 8″, 12″ or even 16″ silicon wafer, while the mold may be a 6″×6″×0.25″ thick quartz plate. The substrate may also be a semiconductor wafer or optical material such as sapphire. The center of the mold has a raised pedestal on the order of 1-50 um in height. Patterns are etched on top of the pedestal on the mold surface. The imprint die size, which is also the size of the raised pedestal, may be rectangular with a size of ˜1″×1″ or ˜1″×1.5″. The mold used for the apparatus may or may not need to be deformable under a reasonable differential pressure between its two sides. The mold could be made of quartz, glass, polymer, semiconductor, metal, or a mixture of some of the above materials. One example of the mold uses 8″ diameter quartz or glass wafer with a substrate thickness 0.2-2 mm; another example of the mold uses 12″ diameter quartz or glass wafer with a substrate thickness 0.2-2 mm; one more example of the mold uses 8″ diameter Ni substrate with a thickness of 0.1-2 mm; yet one more example of the mold uses 200 mm diameter Si substrate with a thickness 0.1-2 mm.
The substrate is uniformly held on a substrate holder 2520. The system has a very long travel range stage 2515, together with stages 2530 of various moving axis. The travel range of X-Y stages guaranteed all regions of the substrate can be moved underneath the mold pedestal for imprint. It also allows the substrate to be moved under the dispenser system for resist application. The stages also provide the fine movement required for high accuracy alignment. Piezo, linear motor or air bearing stages may be used in the system. They can provide an accuracy of <1 nm. The stages also provide the Pitch-Roll motion, help making the surface of substrate to be in parallel with that of the mold. The multiple axis movement of the stage may be used to create the relative movement between mold and substrate after the imprint for an easy separation.
The system has a force sensing apparatus 2510. It is capable of detecting force from 10 grams to 45 kilograms. The sensitivity is around 0.5 gram. It serves as a mean to detect the mask and substrate contact points; it also helps to measure the separation force and control the separation process. A simple way to control separation may be to set a maximum value of force during the separation. Whenever the force is getting larger, the stage will adjust to minimize it.
Laser sensors and optical microscopes in the system may be used to accurately measure the gap between mold and substrate at three or more locations. This helps to level the surface of substrate to that of the molding surface of mold, and to locate the accurate contact height of mold and substrate. In addition, special gas sensors 3521 may also be used to measure the mold and substrate gap (referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
There have been a few difficulties of the step-&-repeat imprint using dispensing resists. First the whole system is in atmosphere, therefore during imprint, it takes time for the air between the substrate and mold to go out. Resist droplet merging may push or dissolve some of the air. However it takes time for the merging process. Second, a mechanical force is used while the Air Cushion Press (ACP) has been proved to be the way for uniform imprint to meet the strict manufacturing requirements of many applications.
In our invention, a dropping resist merging and imprint in air are assisted by localized air pressure (on the back of mold or substrate). Meanwhile it may also be assisted by localized vacuum (generated by gas flow) and Helium may also be used.
Referring to
Referring to
A dropping resist merging in air may also be assisted by electrical field.
In the step and repeat process, a mold for imprinting is held against a mold holder by using vacuum or mechanical clamp means. The mold holder is hollow. A central patterned region of mold to be freely accessible from underneath side, top side or both sides. The mold holder is securely tightened to the gantry. Different mold holders may be used to accommodate mold of different dimensions. The surfaces in contact with the mold on the mold holder are uniform, which can hold the mold with a minimum deformation. The mold holder is positioned to have patterned region exposable through opening section of gantry, and accessible from underneath.
A substrate for imprinting is held on chuck by vacuum pumping through the vacuum grooves. Surface of chuck are designed and special polished in order to hold the substrates with minimum deformation. The substrate may have a moldable material applied on its side surface facing the mold before imprint begins. The moldable material could be a plurality of droplets of imprinting resist dispensed on. When the moldable material is in form of a plurality of droplets before imprinting, the distribution of the droplets could be a uniform matrix of equal spacing among adjacent droplets along one direction or multi directions, or an arbitrary matrix optimized for merging each to achieve desired imprinted patterns, or optimized to the mold pattern density to get the most uniform imprint. In additional to these general demands for imprinting, the special distribution of droplets is preferred to deliver a uniform and continuous contacting interface between the mold and the substrate during the imprint process of the apparatus.
At each die, at beginning of the imprint process, substrate is positioned to a starting position which normally has a larger than 0.5 millimeter gap between the substrate and the mold. Gap measuring sensors are used to detect mold and substrate gaps at 3 different locations. Then the substrate is adjusted until all the gaps are the same. This means the substrate surface is in parallel with the mold surface. Alternatively, the gap may be measured using microscopes and alignment marks on the mold and substrate. In addition, by observing the interference pattern between the mold and the substrate, the substrate surface may also be adjusted to be in parallel with the mold surface.
Next the imprint process is to bring mold and substrate close to carry out alignment. Normally, aligning the substrate and the mold is accomplished by positioning an align marker on the substrate overlapping with a matching align marker on the mold under microscopes.
By using the vertical microscope and alignment marks on the substrate and mold, the substrate is first moved to coarsely align with the mold. This will remove the small error generated during loading and machine assembling, and make sure the fine alignment marks on the mold and substrate are located in the same field of view, therefore no further searching of alignment marks necessary, significantly improving the alignment speed and reliability, which are required for manufacturing. If fine alignment (<250 nm) is required, the 3 titled microscopes will then read mis-alignments at 3 different locations by using the fine alignment marks. The finer X, Y, and rotation error can be further corrected by substrate stages.
The substrate may be moved up to contact with the mold under a controlled push by the stage assembly while remove the air. The top moldable surface on substrate is adjusted in parallel with mold molding surface by the coarse leveling mechanism and optional fine leveling mechanism stage assembly before the final contact. Laser sensors and force sensors can be used to locate the exact contacting point and contact force. To accomplish the contact step, substrate is moved up slowly until there is a slight controllable contact force between the mold and substrate reached. Then the substrate is continued moved up by Z while the Pitch and Roll of the stages are adjusted to keep the contact force low. The initial contact force prevents relative movement between the mold and the substrate, therefore maintaining the relative position between them.
When the contact step is accomplished, the moldable material has been pressed lightly and redistributed to fill space between the mold and the substrate. For case of using very low viscosity moldable material, the press caused by the contact may be sufficient to imprint patterns of the mold into the moldable material. In order to guarantee quality of patterns imprinted, it may need to apply higher pressure press on the mold and the substrate than the contact.
Higher pressure press may be applied on the mold and the substrate by filling mold mini-chamber with high pressure gas. Air Cushion Press (ACP) is realized during this step for imprinting. Details of Air Cushion Press are described by Stephen Y. Chou in U.S. Pat. No. 6,482,742 under a title of “Fluid Pressure Imprint Lithography”.
After the moldable material redistributes to completely fill every space between the mold and the substrate, then, it is consolidated to solid by a UV exposure. Finally, the high pressure gas for ACP is vented to atmosphere. So far, pattern formation of imprinting is completed. The substrate is ready for being released from the mold.
One can separate mold and substrate by generating relative movement between them: this can be accomplished by peeling substrate from mold; by inflatable O-rings; by gas flow; or by a combination of these methods. Separation may also be implemented by bending of mold or substrate, either at an edge, in the center, either symmetric or non-symmetric.
The separation can be realized by combining mold deformation and stage movement. A way to separate the substrate from the mold starts from positioning chuck underneath substrate at a predetermined gap. Then, a differential pressure between mold mini-chamber and air is introduced to deform the mold. As deformation is enlarged by increasing the differential pressure, substrate loses contact from the mold starting from die periphery and expanding toward die center. The differential pressure reaches a predetermined value so that back side of substrate completely contacts with chuck. By now, a significant peripheral region of the substrate is released from the mold and central region of the substrate is not yet. After that, the substrate is held against chuck by pumping back side of the substrate through the vacuum grooves on the chuck surface. Finally, the established differential pressure is removed to restore the mold backward its original shape. Because the substrate is vacuum held against the chuck, the remaining central area of the substrate is separated from the mold. The substrate stays on chuck after the separation ready for next die imprint and the mold is returned to its starting status.
Alternative ways to separate the substrate from the mold are through the relative movement of mold and substrate. These ways share a common concept that use both vacuum and mechanic means to hold the mold and the substrate, and pull the substrate in certain way using the stage assembly to create the motion to separate. The mold may be intentionally deformed to further facilitate the separation. The separation starts from vacuum holding back side of substrate against top surface of chuck by pumping through the vacuum groves on the chuck. One way to separate is to pull substrate downward by moving the stage assembly down. Because the substrate is held against the vacuum grooves on the chuck and the mold is deformable, at beginning of the pull, the mold is deformed so that one corner of the substrate is separated first. As the downward pulling is progressing, the separated region of the substrate propagates from the firstly separated periphery inner ward the center. At end of the downward pulling, the substrate is completely separated from the mold.
Alternatively, the separation motion of the substrate can be much more complex than a simple downward pulling motion to best separate the substrate from the mold, reducing the possible damage to nano-scale patterns and improving separation speed. The stage holding the substrate in the system may be capable of 6 axis motion movements, therefore the substrate can move with its motion and speed accurately controlled. The separation may include movements of multiple steps with the speed and direction of each movement be controlled. In one example, the substrate moves in both Roll and Pitch motion, and at the same time moves down in Z: the combination movement will peel the substrate from the mold diagonally. In another example, the separation include 2 step movements: first the substrate moves down in Z while going through Roll motion, then it moves down in Z going through Pitch motion. Further, the separation may be paused, waiting for the further propagation of separation boundary.
The separation completion may be detected by sudden changing of vacuum reading at the system and mold/substrate holders; it may be detected by the recorded force during separation or a sudden change of force reading; it may also be detected by processing the camera images from top view of the die area during separation and finding the time where the contact area disappeared.
When on die imprint is finished, the substrate stage will move the substrate underneath the resist dispensing system if dispensing resist is to be used. After dispensing, the stage will move the substrate to the next position.
To improve the throughput of the system, resist droplets with low evaporation rate may be used. All the resist droplets may be dispensed at a time on all the dies of the substrate. Then the substrate does not have to come back to dispenser station each time for dispensing.
The improvements possessed by this disclosure are emphasized again herein. The apparatus embodiments described in this disclosure accomplish a full cycle of imprinting inside the chamber through a process essentially involving deforming the mold and positioning the substrate by the stage assembly. The speed to finish each step of the process is primarily decided by stage response and how fast to deform the mold. Using state-of-art stage technology, stage response can be very fast and capable of responding to requests of each step well within seconds. Furthermore, the chamber uses vacuum to eliminate possibility of trapping air between the mold and the substrate. The Z stage required for the process is placed outside of chamber, which significantly reduced the chamber volume, therefore reduced the time for vacuum and pressure the chamber, increased the throughput. The special ring seal design inside chamber allows the intrinsic Air Cushion Press (ACP) of the process to be carried out for nanoimprint. The ACP not only provides very uniform imprinting force to achieve high pattern transfer fidelity, but also reduces possible damage to the imprint molds and substrates, both are crucial for manufacturing.
It is to be understood that the above described embodiments are illustrative of only a few of the many embodiments that can represent applications of this disclosure. Numerous and varied other arrangements can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure.
When describing elements or features and/or embodiments thereof, the articles “a”, “an”, “the”, and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements or features. The terms “comprising”, “including”, and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements or features beyond those specifically described.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that various changes can be made to the exemplary embodiments and implementations described above without departing from the scope of the disclosure. Accordingly, all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings should be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
It is further to be understood that the processes or steps described herein are not to be construed as necessarily requiring their performance in the particular order discussed or illustrated. It is also to be understood that additional or alternative processes or steps may be employed.
Hu, Lin, Chou, Stephen Y., Tan, Hua
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
1048281, | |||
2124711, | |||
2285080, | |||
3485908, | |||
3678889, | |||
3830194, | |||
3830681, | |||
4112030, | May 02 1975 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and system for the production of sheet or platter shaped information carriers |
4506815, | Dec 09 1982 | ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC | Bubbler cylinder and dip tube device |
4524716, | Jan 18 1984 | WTA INC | Adjustable air knife |
4593740, | Feb 08 1983 | Method and apparatus for freeing a pattern or shaping element from foundry material | |
5772905, | Nov 15 1995 | Regents of the University of Minnesota; MINNESOTA, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF | Nanoimprint lithography |
5804017, | Jul 27 1995 | Imation Corp | Method and apparatus for making an optical information record |
5947027, | Sep 08 1998 | Motorola, Inc. | Printing apparatus with inflatable means for advancing a substrate towards the stamping surface |
6235118, | Dec 27 1995 | Vacuum Metallurgical Co., Ltd. | Method for forming a thin film of ultra-fine particles, and an apparatus for the same |
6286452, | Dec 02 1998 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Sputtering apparatus |
6309580, | Nov 15 1995 | MINNESOTA, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF | Release surfaces, particularly for use in nanoimprint lithography |
6482742, | Jul 18 2000 | Nanonex Corporation | Fluid pressure imprint lithography |
6518189, | Nov 15 1995 | Regents of the University of Minnesota | Method and apparatus for high density nanostructures |
6578891, | Jul 08 1999 | Ebara Corporation | Substrate holder and substrate transfer apparatus using the same |
6696099, | Jan 28 1995 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Optical disk employing integral substrate, and method for manufacturing the same |
6696220, | Oct 02 2000 | Board of Regents, The University of Texas System | Template for room temperature, low pressure micro-and nano-imprint lithography |
6805054, | May 14 2003 | CITIBANK, N A | Method, system and holder for transferring templates during imprint lithography processes |
6828244, | Nov 15 1995 | Regents of the University of Minnesota | Method and apparatus for high density nanostructures |
6900881, | Jul 11 2002 | CITIBANK, N A | Step and repeat imprint lithography systems |
6908861, | Jul 11 2002 | Molecular Imprints, Inc | Method for imprint lithography using an electric field |
7137803, | Jul 18 2000 | Fluid pressure imprint lithography | |
7294294, | Oct 17 2000 | Seagate Technology LLC | Surface modified stamper for imprint lithography |
7322287, | Jul 18 2000 | Nanonex Corporation | Apparatus for fluid pressure imprint lithography |
7537658, | Dec 24 2004 | Sumco Techxiv Corporation | Method for producing epitaxial silicon wafer |
8329089, | Apr 25 2006 | LG DISPLAY CO , LTD | Method for forming a resist pattern |
8377361, | Nov 28 2006 | Imprint lithography with improved substrate/mold separation | |
8632720, | Jul 18 2000 | Nanonex Corporation | Methods and apparatus for rapid imprint lithography |
8747092, | Jan 22 2010 | Nanonex Corporation | Fast nanoimprinting apparatus using deformale mold |
20020115002, | |||
20020134512, | |||
20030064604, | |||
20030159608, | |||
20030196763, | |||
20040008334, | |||
20040202865, | |||
20040251775, | |||
20050042553, | |||
20050056216, | |||
20050116370, | |||
20050145119, | |||
20050146078, | |||
20050170269, | |||
20050271900, | |||
20050275125, | |||
20060037997, | |||
20060131785, | |||
20060157444, | |||
20060172549, | |||
20060172553, | |||
20060219754, | |||
20060222899, | |||
20060262393, | |||
20060273488, | |||
20060292463, | |||
20070059497, | |||
20070114686, | |||
20070166557, | |||
20070190200, | |||
20070228589, | |||
20080122144, | |||
20080131623, | |||
20080188070, | |||
20080202365, | |||
20080204684, | |||
20080213418, | |||
20090140445, | |||
20100173032, | |||
20100201042, | |||
20100244324, | |||
20110180965, | |||
20110183070, | |||
20120019921, | |||
20120299222, | |||
20140102327, | |||
20140239529, | |||
JP2003077867, | |||
WO2001042858, | |||
WO2003090985, | |||
WO2004021083, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Mar 17 2014 | Nanonex Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Mar 25 2014 | TAN, HUA | Nanonex Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032528 | /0237 | |
Mar 25 2014 | HU, LIN | Nanonex Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032528 | /0237 | |
Mar 25 2014 | CHOU, STEPHEN Y | Nanonex Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032528 | /0237 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 06 2022 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 23 2021 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 23 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 23 2022 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 23 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 23 2025 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 23 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 23 2026 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 23 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 23 2029 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 23 2030 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 23 2030 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 23 2032 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |