Methods and apparatuses for enabling remote access to an application program via a computer network provided. Logical elements of the application program may be determined, from which a state model of the application program may be developed. A remote access program updates the state model in accordance with user input data received from a user interface program, generates control data in accordance with the updated state model and provides the same to the application program. The state model may be updated in accordance with application data received from the application program, application representation data in accordance with the updated state model are generated and provided to the user interface program for display at, e.g., a remote client computing device. The application program may be a legacy mainframe application to which remote access is provided without the need to modify the source code of the mainframe application.
|
19. A method for providing remote access to a legacy application program via a computer network comprising:
determining logical elements of the legacy program in accordance with corresponding states of the legacy application program, the legacy application program being executed on a first computer connected to the computer network;
determining a state model that associates the logical elements of the legacy application program with the corresponding states of the legacy application program; and
generating a remote access program at a server computer in accordance with the state model, the remote access program:
updating the state model in accordance with input data received from a user interface program;
generating control data in accordance with the updated state model and providing the control data to the legacy application program;
updating the state model in accordance with application data received from the legacy application program;
generating application representation data in accordance with the updated state model; and
providing the application representation data to the user interface program to display the legacy application program in accordance with information contained in the state model.
1. A server-based method for providing remote access to a legacy application program over a communication network, comprising:
determining logical elements of the legacy application program in accordance with corresponding states of the legacy application program;
determining a state model in accordance with the logical elements of the legacy application program, the state model associating the logical elements of the legacy application program with the corresponding states of the legacy application program;
generating a remote access program in accordance with the state model, the remote access program executing on a server computing device;
updating the state model in accordance with data received from a user interface program executing on a client computer and in accordance with application data received from the legacy application program;
enabling communication between the legacy application program and the client computer; and
providing application representation data generated in accordance with the application data to the user interface program to the client computer, the application representation data enabling the client computer to display the legacy application program in accordance with information contained in the state model.
10. An apparatus for providing remote access to a legacy application program over a communication network, comprising:
a network interface device that interfaces with the communication network;
a memory that stores computer executable instructions; and
a processor that executes the computer executable instructions to:
determine logical elements of the legacy application program in accordance with corresponding states of the legacy application program;
determine a state model in accordance with the logical elements of the legacy application program, the state model associating the logical elements of the legacy application program with the corresponding states of the legacy application program;
generate a remote access program in accordance with the state model, the remote access program executing on a server computing device;
update the state model in accordance with data received from a user interface program executing on a client computer and in accordance with application data received from the legacy application program;
enable communication between the legacy application program and the client computer; and
provide application representation data generated in accordance with the application data to the user interface program to the client computer, the application representation data enabling the client computer to display the legacy application program in accordance with information contained in the state model.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
7. The method of
8. The method of
9. The method of
receiving an input at the user interface program;
updating the state model at the remote access program in accordance with the input and generating control data; and
providing control data to the legacy application.
11. The apparatus of
12. The apparatus of
13. The apparatus of
14. The apparatus of
16. The apparatus of
17. The apparatus of
18. The apparatus of
|
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/425,496, filed Mar. 21, 2012, and entitled “Method and System for Providing a State Model of an Application Program,” and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/487,598, filed May 18, 2011, and entitled “Method and System for Providing a State Model of an Application Program,” which are each incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Ubiquitous remote access to services, application programs and data has become commonplace as a result of the growth and availability of broadband and wireless network access. Remote access to application programs may be provided using a mobile device connected to a server computer via a computer network. Use of wireless handheld devices such as, for example, IPHONE, ANDROID, and IPAD has rapidly increased over the last couple of years to the extent that now many own at least one wireless handheld device. State of the art wireless mobile technology enables use of small wireless handheld devices to access the Internet and interact with various types of application programs.
Most computer applications used in, for example, large businesses, government organizations, and hospitals are still legacy mainframe computer applications run on a mainframe computer network. The original terminals have been replaced by Personal Computers (PCs) and terminal emulators enabling the PC user to interact with the mainframe computer application. However, to provide mobile devices with remote access to such programs, it is generally required that the source code of the mainframe computer application and/or the terminal emulator is modified in order to create an appropriate interface for the mobile device to interact with the legacy application. This can be expensive, time consuming and difficult to accomplish.
According to an aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a method for providing remote access to a legacy application program over a communication network. The method may include determining logical elements of the legacy application program; determining a state model in accordance with the logical elements of the legacy application program, the state model providing an association of logical elements of the legacy application program with corresponding states of the legacy application program; generating a remote access program in accordance with the state model, the remote access program executing on a server computing device; updating the state model in accordance with data received from a user interface program executing on a client computer and in accordance with application data received from the legacy application program; enabling communication between the legacy application program and a client computer; and providing application representation data generated in accordance with the application data to the user interface program to the client computer, the application representation data enabling the client computer to display a visualization of the legacy application program in accordance with information contained in the state model.
According to another aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided an apparatus for providing remote access to a legacy application over a communication network. The apparatus may include a network interface device that interfaces with the communication network, a memory that stores computer executable instructions, and a processor that executes the computer executable instructions. The instructions may cause the apparatus to determine logical elements of the legacy application program; determine a state model in accordance with the logical elements of the legacy application program, the state model providing an association of logical elements of the legacy application program with corresponding states of the legacy application program; generate a remote access program in accordance with the state model, the remote access program executing on a server computing device; update the state model in accordance with data received from a user interface program executing on a client computer and in accordance with application data received from the legacy application program; enable communication between the legacy application program and a client computer; and provide application representation data generated in accordance with the application data to the user interface program to the client computer, the application representation data enabling the client computer to display a visualization of the legacy application program in accordance with information contained in the state model.
According to another aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a method for providing remote access to an application program. The method may include determining logical elements of the legacy program, the application program being executed on a first computer connected to the computer network; determining a state model of the legacy application program in accordance with the logical elements; and generating a remote access program at a server computer in accordance with the state model. The remote access program may perform updating the state model in accordance with input data received from a user interface program; generating control data in accordance with the updated state model and providing the control data to the legacy application program; updating the state model in accordance with application data received from the legacy application program; generating application representation data in accordance with the updated state model; and providing the application representation data to the user interface program to provide a visualization of the legacy application program in accordance with information contained in the state model.
Other systems, methods, features and/or advantages will be or may become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and/or advantages be included within this description and be protected by the accompanying claims.
The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale relative to each other. Like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the disclosure belongs. As will become evident to those of ordinary skill in the art, methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present disclosure. As will be appreciated from the present disclosure, implementations will be described for enabling remote access to a mainframe application computer program via a computer network absent source code modification of the mainframe computer application and/or the terminal emulator.
Referring to
The server computer 102B may be connected, for example, via the computer network 110 to a Local Area Network (LAN) 109. For example, the LAN 109 may be an internal computer network of an institution such as a hospital, a bank, a large business, or a government department. Typically, such institutions still use a mainframe computer 102A and a database 108 connected to the LAN 109, as these legacy systems provide numerous services to the institution. Numerous application programs are performed, for example, by executing on processor 104A executable commands of the respective application program stored in memory 106A of the mainframe computer 102A. The original terminals connected to the mainframe computer 102A via the LAN 109 and used to interact with the mainframe computer 102A have been replaced with Personal Computers (PCs). Remote access to the application program executed on the mainframe computer 102A is then provided using terminal emulator programs, typically executed on the PCs.
According to some implementations, remote access to the application program using, for example, a handheld wireless device 112A, 112B is provided by executing a remote access program or application on processor 104B of the server computer 102B which is in communication with a respective terminal emulator program executed using, for example, the processor 104B of the server computer 102B. Communication between the client computer 112A or 112B and the server computer 102B may be provided as communication between the remote access program or application and a user interface program or client remote access application via, for example, a wireless computer network, as illustrated in
The user interface program or client remote access application may be performed by executing executable commands on processor 118A, 118B of the client computer 112A, 112B with the commands being stored in memory 120A, 120B of the client computer 112A, 112B, respectively. For example, the user interface program or client remote access application is performed by executing executable commands on processor 118A, 118B of the client computer 112A, 112B with the commands being stored in memory 120A, 120B of the client computer 112A, 112B, respectively. Alternatively, the user interface program or client remote access application is executed on the server computer 102B which is then accessed via an URL by a generic client application such as, for example, a web browser executed on the client computer 112A, 112B. The user interface is implemented using, for example, Hyper Text Markup Language HTML 5.
The remote access program or application may determine control data in accordance with the user input data received from the user interface program or client remote access application and provides the same to the terminal emulator program. The terminal emulator program is in communication with the application program executed on the mainframe computer 102A. Data generated by the application program are then provided via the terminal emulator program as application data to the remote access program or application, which generates application representation data in dependence thereupon and provides the same to the user interface program or client remote access application for display. For example, the remote access program or application and the terminal emulator program are executed using the processor 104B of the server computer 102B connected to the LAN 109 via computer network 110, as illustrated in
The operation of the remote access program or application may be performed in accordance with a state model of the application program, as illustrated in
Table 1, below, illustrates an example section of a state model of an application program for purchasing a ticket. The state model may be represented in an Extensible Markup Language (XML) document. Other representations of the state model are contemplated, such as, but not limited to, a binary file, a data structure, etc. Different states of the application program associated with different screens related to different stages of the ticket purchasing process, such as, for example, main menu, ticket customer entry, etc., are defined, as well as transitions between the different states and the related triggers. For example, for each state one or more “fields” are defined for receiving user input data and displaying the same, as illustrated in Table 1 for the main menu.
TABLE 1
<ApplicationState>
<Screens>
<Screen id=″0″ name=″main menu″>
<Fields>
<Field name=″name″ description=″Customer name″ default=″″>
<Type fieldType=″Text″ maxChars=″128″ />
<Validation />
</Field>
</Fields>
</Screen>
<Screen id=″1″ name=″ticket customer entry″ />
<Screen id=″2″ name=″ticket customer choice″ />
<Screen id=″3″ name=″ticket customer payment″ />
<Screen id=″4″ name=″ticket customer payment accepted″ />
<Screen id=″5″ name=″ticket customer payment declined″ />
</Screens>
<NavModel>
<Transition sourceId=″0″ destId=″1″ trigger=″Key_1″ />
<Transition sourceId=″1″ destId=″0″ trigger=″Key_ESC″ />
<Transition sourceId=″3″ destId=″5″ trigger=″server″ />
<Transition sourceId=″5″ destId=″3″ trigger=″Key_ESC″ />
</NavModel>
<ScreenData>
<CurrentScreen id=″0″ />
<Screen id=″0″>
<Value field=″name″>John Miller</Value>
</Screen>
</ScreenData>
</ApplicationState>
Referring to
At 18, the development program then generates the remote access program or application in accordance with the state model, for example, in the form of executable XML commands. At 20, the user interface program or client remote access application is generated to interact with the remote access program or application. The user interface program or client remote access application is generated using standard application tools such as, for example, Microsoft Silverlight. The development program is performed for example, by executing executable commands stored in a storage medium on a processor using, for example, the processor 104B of the server computer 102B. Alternatively, the development is performed using a computer in communication with the server computer 102B via the computer network 110.
In accordance with some implementations, the development program, the remote access program or application and the user interface program or client remote access application are implemented using standard programming tools such as, for example, Extensible Markup Language (XML), Microsoft Foundation Class (MFC) applications, Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), Adobe Flash and Microsoft Silverlight. In accordance with some implementations, communication is enabled using standard communication technologies such as, for example, Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP), virtual private networks (VPN), and secure socket layers (SSL) which are well known to those skilled in the art. Optionally, the terminal emulator program may be omitted if communication with the application program is enabled using, for example, RDP or MFC applications.
The present disclosure has been described herein with regard to preferred implementations. However, it will be obvious to persons skilled in the art that a number of variations and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the disclosure as described herein.
McFadzean, David Bruce, Thomas, Monroe Milas, Robinson, Kevin Glen, Stephure, Matthew James, Lehmann, Glen, Lemire, Pierre Joseph
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11481233, | Sep 13 2019 | LOGISTIVIEW, INC | Augmenting legacy user interfaces using workflows |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4975690, | Nov 07 1988 | IBM Corporation | Method for concurrent data entry and manipulation in multiple applications |
5345550, | Dec 23 1992 | International Business Machines Corporation | User-modifiable popup menus for object oriented behavior |
5491800, | Dec 20 1993 | Apple Inc | Object-oriented remote procedure call networking system |
5555003, | Apr 12 1993 | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO , LTD | Method for selecting an item on a graphics screen |
5742778, | Aug 30 1993 | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | Method and apparatus to sense and multicast window events to a plurality of existing applications for concurrent execution |
5844553, | Aug 30 1993 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP | Mechanism to control and use window events among applications in concurrent computing |
5870759, | Oct 09 1996 | Oracle International Corporation | System for synchronizing data between computers using a before-image of data |
5903725, | Sep 15 1995 | International Business Machines Corporation | Recoverable proxy object in an object oriented environment |
5909545, | Jan 19 1996 | Tridia Corporation | Method and system for on demand downloading of module to enable remote control of an application program over a network |
5920311, | Dec 22 1992 | Lenovo PC International | Distributed client/server window presentation system |
5978842, | Jan 14 1997 | NETMIND TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Distributed-client change-detection tool with change-detection augmented by multiple clients |
6045048, | Nov 24 1993 | Metrologi Instruments, Inc. | System and method for composing menus of URL-encoded bar code symbols while surfing the internet using an internet browser program |
6061689, | May 06 1997 | International Business Machines Corporation | Object aggregation representation of relational database rows having nontraditional datatypes |
6075531, | Dec 15 1997 | International Business Machines Corporation | Computer system and method of manipulating multiple graphical user interface components on a computer display with a proximity pointer |
6141698, | Jan 29 1997 | CRS LLC | Method and system for injecting new code into existing application code |
6145098, | Oct 01 1997 | Round Rock Research, LLC | System for displaying system status |
6253228, | Mar 31 1997 | Apple Inc | Method and apparatus for updating and synchronizing information between a client and a server |
6343313, | Mar 26 1996 | PIXION, INC | Computer conferencing system with real-time multipoint, multi-speed, multi-stream scalability |
6453334, | Jun 16 1997 | NUMECENT HOLDINGS, INC | Method and apparatus to allow remotely located computer programs and/or data to be accessed on a local computer in a secure, time-limited manner, with persistent caching |
6453356, | Apr 15 1998 | CommScope EMEA Limited; CommScope Technologies LLC | Data exchange system and method |
6570563, | Jul 12 1995 | Sony Corporation | Method and system for three-dimensional virtual reality space sharing and for information transmission |
6601233, | Jul 30 1999 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Business components framework |
6792607, | May 18 2000 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Databinding using server-side control objects |
6918113, | Nov 06 2000 | NUMECENT HOLDINGS, INC | Client installation and execution system for streamed applications |
6938096, | Apr 12 1999 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REMOTE NETWORKING USING PORT PROXYING BY DETECTING IF THE DESIGNATED PORT ON A CLIENT COMPUTER IS BLOCKED, THEN ENCAPSULATING THE COMMUNICATIONS IN A DIFFERENT FORMAT AND REDIRECTING TO AN OPEN PORT |
6976077, | Jul 06 1999 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Automatic and transparent synchronization of server-side state information with a client application |
7065568, | Nov 30 2000 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | System and method for managing states and user context over stateless protocols |
7069227, | Feb 05 1999 | Zansor Systems, LLC | Healthcare information network |
7073059, | Jun 08 2001 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP | Secure machine platform that interfaces to operating systems and customized control programs |
7149761, | Nov 13 2001 | Numecent Holdings Ltd | System and method for managing the synchronization of replicated version-managed databases |
7167893, | Oct 03 2001 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation | Methods and systems for processing a plurality of errors |
7174504, | Nov 09 2001 | YOZOSOFT CO , LTD | Integrated data processing system with links |
7181686, | Oct 29 1999 | International Business Machines Corporation | Selecting screens in a GUI using events generated by a set of view controllers |
7240162, | Oct 22 2004 | NUMECENT HOLDINGS, INC | System and method for predictive streaming |
7246063, | Feb 15 2002 | SAP SE | Adapting a user interface for voice control |
7320131, | Jun 06 2001 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for selecting a server to process a request |
7343310, | Apr 28 2000 | THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY | System and method for providing web-based user interface to legacy, personal-lines insurance applications |
7350151, | Sep 14 2000 | XEVO INC | Display state and/or cell based user interface provision method and apparatus |
7418711, | Apr 28 2003 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Messaging bridge that facilitates communication with a mainframe environment |
7451196, | Dec 15 2000 | NUMECENT HOLDINGS, INC | Method and system for executing a software application in a virtual environment |
7577751, | Jun 16 1997 | NUMECENT HOLDINGS, INC | Software streaming system and method |
7620901, | Mar 21 2006 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Simultaneous input across multiple applications |
7647370, | Oct 24 2003 | Verizon Patent and Licensing Inc | Screen scraping interface |
7650444, | Sep 28 2006 | DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC | Systems and methods for remotely managing an application-specific display device |
7656799, | Jul 29 2003 | Citrix Systems, Inc | Flow control system architecture |
7703024, | Aug 31 2004 | SAP SE | Obtaining a graphical user interface to access a remote computing system |
7706399, | Dec 19 2003 | Intel Corporation | Polling in wireless networks |
7725331, | Dec 01 1999 | ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, AS SUCCESSOR COLLATERAL AGENT | System and method for implementing a global master patient index |
7783568, | May 01 2001 | Visa International Service Association | Payment services for multi-national corporations |
7802183, | May 17 2001 | Electronic record management system | |
7831919, | Dec 18 2006 | NORTONLIFELOCK INC | Generic web service frontend |
7921078, | Apr 20 2005 | Daybreak Game Company LLC | System for negotiated differential compression |
7941488, | Jul 26 2002 | SNAP INC | Authorizing message publication to a group of subscribing clients via a publish/subscribe service |
7966572, | Feb 20 2004 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | User interface transition |
8024523, | Nov 07 2007 | NUMECENT HOLDINGS, INC | Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints |
8261345, | Oct 23 2006 | NUMECENT HOLDINGS, INC | Rule-based application access management |
8356252, | Sep 02 2009 | Synchronoss Technologies, Inc | System and method for providing a computer display form layout |
8359591, | Nov 13 2004 | NUMECENT HOLDINGS, INC | Streaming from a media device |
8509230, | Jun 16 1997 | NUMECENT HOLDINGS, INC | Software streaming system and method |
8527706, | Mar 23 2005 | NUMECENT HOLDINGS, INC | Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints |
8533103, | Sep 14 2010 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Maintaining latency guarantees for shared resources |
8572178, | Jul 01 2011 | Amazon Technologies, Inc | Executing applications in remotely emulated computing devices |
8606952, | Jan 15 2008 | LENOVO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED | Method and system for optimizing bandwidth usage in remote visualization |
8607158, | Dec 09 2010 | International Business Machines Corporation | Content presentation in remote monitoring sessions for information technology systems |
8627081, | Jul 14 2005 | Conax AS | Multimedia data protection |
8667054, | Jul 12 2010 | OPUS MEDICUS, INC | Systems and methods for networked, in-context, composed, high resolution image viewing |
8832260, | Oct 05 2007 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for monitoring components of a remote access server farm |
8910112, | Jul 30 2008 | SAP SE | Extended enterprise connector framework using direct web remoting (DWR) |
8924512, | Jun 15 2007 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Extensible remote display infrastructure with dynamic virtual channels |
9239812, | Aug 08 2012 | RPX Corporation | System for and method of providing a universal I/O command translation framework in an application publishing environment |
9686205, | Nov 29 2013 | RESOLUTIONMD, INC | Method for providing a connection of a client to an unmanaged service in a client-server remote access system |
20010033299, | |||
20010047393, | |||
20020032751, | |||
20020032783, | |||
20020032804, | |||
20020092029, | |||
20030014735, | |||
20030023670, | |||
20030055893, | |||
20030065738, | |||
20030120324, | |||
20030120762, | |||
20030149941, | |||
20030163514, | |||
20030184584, | |||
20030208472, | |||
20040015842, | |||
20040029638, | |||
20040039742, | |||
20040068516, | |||
20040077347, | |||
20040103195, | |||
20040103339, | |||
20040106916, | |||
20040117804, | |||
20040162876, | |||
20040183827, | |||
20040236633, | |||
20040243919, | |||
20040249885, | |||
20050005024, | |||
20050010871, | |||
20050021687, | |||
20050050229, | |||
20050138631, | |||
20050188046, | |||
20050188313, | |||
20050190203, | |||
20050198578, | |||
20050216421, | |||
20050240906, | |||
20060004874, | |||
20060026006, | |||
20060031377, | |||
20060031481, | |||
20060036770, | |||
20060085835, | |||
20060101397, | |||
20060130069, | |||
20060231175, | |||
20060236328, | |||
20060258462, | |||
20060265689, | |||
20060271563, | |||
20060288171, | |||
20060294418, | |||
20070024645, | |||
20070047535, | |||
20070067754, | |||
20070079244, | |||
20070112880, | |||
20070120763, | |||
20070130292, | |||
20070136677, | |||
20070203944, | |||
20070203990, | |||
20070203999, | |||
20070208718, | |||
20070226636, | |||
20070233706, | |||
20070244990, | |||
20070256073, | |||
20070282951, | |||
20080016155, | |||
20080134211, | |||
20080146194, | |||
20080159175, | |||
20080183190, | |||
20080313282, | |||
20090044171, | |||
20090080523, | |||
20090089742, | |||
20090119644, | |||
20090209239, | |||
20090217177, | |||
20090328032, | |||
20100061238, | |||
20100077058, | |||
20100131591, | |||
20100150031, | |||
20100174773, | |||
20100205147, | |||
20100223566, | |||
20100223661, | |||
20100268762, | |||
20100268813, | |||
20110138016, | |||
20110138283, | |||
20110145863, | |||
20110154464, | |||
20110157196, | |||
20110162062, | |||
20110184993, | |||
20110213830, | |||
20110222442, | |||
20110223882, | |||
20110246891, | |||
20110252152, | |||
20110314093, | |||
20120030275, | |||
20120084713, | |||
20120090004, | |||
20120133675, | |||
20120151373, | |||
20120154633, | |||
20120221792, | |||
20120226742, | |||
20120245918, | |||
20120246225, | |||
20120324032, | |||
20120324358, | |||
20130007227, | |||
20130013671, | |||
20130031618, | |||
20130046815, | |||
20130046816, | |||
20130054679, | |||
20130070740, | |||
20130086156, | |||
20130086652, | |||
20130110895, | |||
20130113833, | |||
20130117474, | |||
20130132485, | |||
20130138791, | |||
20130147845, | |||
20130159062, | |||
20130179962, | |||
20130212483, | |||
20130262566, | |||
20130290408, | |||
20130346482, | |||
20140136667, | |||
20140240524, | |||
20140298420, | |||
20150067035, | |||
20150067769, | |||
20150156133, | |||
20150319252, | |||
20160054897, | |||
20160226979, | |||
CN101539932, | |||
CN101883097, | |||
CN102129632, | |||
CN102821413, | |||
EP349463, | |||
EP1422901, | |||
JP2002055870, | |||
JP2004287758, | |||
JP2005031807, | |||
JP2005521946, | |||
JP2007084744, | |||
JP2008099055, | |||
JP2010256972, | |||
RU2295752, | |||
RU2298287, | |||
RU2305860, | |||
WO1998058478, | |||
WO2001016724, | |||
WO2002009106, | |||
WO2003032569, | |||
WO2003083684, | |||
WO2010060206, | |||
WO2010088768, | |||
WO2010127327, | |||
WO2011087545, | |||
WO2013024342, | |||
WO2013024343, | |||
WO2013109984, | |||
WO2013128284, | |||
WO2013153439, | |||
WO2009064375, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Mar 16 2012 | LEMIRE, PIERRE JOSEPH | CALGARY SCIENTIFIC INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 046622 | /0908 | |
Mar 16 2012 | STEPHURE, MATTHEW JAMES | CALGARY SCIENTIFIC INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 046622 | /0908 | |
Mar 16 2012 | MCFADZEAN, DAVID BRUCE | CALGARY SCIENTIFIC INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 046622 | /0908 | |
Mar 16 2012 | LEHMANN, GLEN | CALGARY SCIENTIFIC INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 046622 | /0908 | |
Mar 19 2012 | ROBINSON, KEVIN GLEN | CALGARY SCIENTIFIC INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 046622 | /0908 | |
Mar 20 2012 | THOMAS, MONROE MILAS | CALGARY SCIENTIFIC INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 046622 | /0908 | |
Jan 30 2015 | Calgary Scientific Inc.. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jan 25 2024 | CALGARY SCIENTIFIC INC | RESOLUTIONMD, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 067914 | /0636 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 10 2019 | PTGR: Petition Related to Maintenance Fees Granted. |
Jun 01 2022 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 18 2021 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 18 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 18 2022 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 18 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 18 2025 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 18 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 18 2026 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 18 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 18 2029 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 18 2030 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 18 2030 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 18 2032 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |